Core & Main Stock price
Compare with Peer Group
📊 Peer Group
📈 What is it?
The peer group consists of the companies with the most similar business model. They serve as a benchmark for putting a stock into context.
🧮 How is it selected?
Based on similarity of business model, meaning companies from the same industry with comparable products and a similar customer base. That's the only way to compare apples to apples.
🏛️ Why does it matter?
Whether a stock is cheap or expensive is best judged by comparison. A P/E of 18 or an EV/FCF of 20 can look cheap or expensive depending on the yardstick. The peer group gives you the most accurate one: companies with a similar business model that operate under the same conditions.
🎯 What does it mean for investors?
When a metric sits below the peer average, the stock is valued more cheaply relative to its competitors, and above the average more expensively. A discount to the peer group can be an opportunity, but it can also have a reason (for example lower growth). The comparison is a starting point, not a verdict.
Is Core & Main a Top Scorer Stock based on the Dividend, High-Growth-Investing or Leverman Strategy?
As a Free StocksGuide user, you can view scores for all 9,142 stocks worldwide.
StocksGuide Premium
StocksGuide Unlimited
Key metrics
📘 Market Capitalization
📈 What is it?
Market capitalization shows how much a company is currently worth on the stock market.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It helps classify companies by size (Large, Mid, Small Cap) and indicates their market presence and relative stability.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Large-cap companies tend to be more stable, often pay dividends, but may grow more slowly.
- Smaller firms may offer higher growth potential but come with more volatility.
- Market capitalization is a useful indicator of company size — but not a measure of whether a stock is undervalued or overvalued.
📘 Enterprise Value (EV)
📈 What is it?
Enterprise Value represents the total cost to acquire a company — including its debt and excluding its cash reserves.
🧮 How is it calculated?
(= Market Cap + Net Debt)
🏛️ Why is it important?
EV gives a more complete picture of a company's value than market cap alone and is used in key valuation ratios like EV/FCF or EV/Sales.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Enterprise Value shows the true cost of buying a company, including all financial obligations.
- It is more accurate than just looking at market cap, especially when comparing companies with different levels of debt or cash.
- Professional investors prefer EV-based multiples because they better reflect the company’s full financial footprint.
📘 Net Debt
📈 What is it?
Net Debt shows how much debt remains after subtracting a company’s available cash reserves.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It indicates how dependent a company is on borrowed money and how easily it can service its debt in the short term.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Low or negative net debt signals financial strength and flexibility.
- Companies with strong cash positions are better positioned in crises.
- High net debt increases financial risk — especially in environments with rising interest rates or economic downturns.
📘 Cash
📈 What is it?
Cash represents all liquid assets a company can access immediately — including cash, bank deposits, and short-term investments.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It reflects a company’s financial flexibility and resilience — enabling investments, buybacks, or buffer in downturns.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A strong cash position means greater room for maneuver and crisis resistance.
- Cash-rich companies can invest, pay down debt, or repurchase shares.
- But excess idle cash might indicate a lack of growth opportunities.
📘 Shares Outstanding
📈 What is it?
Shares outstanding represent the total number of a company’s shares currently held by investors — excluding treasury stock.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It’s the basis for key metrics like Earnings Per Share (EPS), Market Capitalization, or the Price/Earnings ratio (P/E).
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Fewer shares in circulation typically increase earnings per share — making each share more valuable.
- Share buybacks reduce the number of shares and boost per-share metrics.
- Issuing new shares does the opposite — diluting shareholder value and lowering per-share figures.
📘 Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E)
📈 What is it?
The P/E ratio shows how many times a company's earnings per share are reflected in its current share price — in other words, how "expensive" the stock appears relative to its profits.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
The P/E ratio is one of the most widely used valuation metrics. It helps investors assess whether a stock appears cheap or expensive compared to its earnings power.
🧮 Calculation
📊 P/E (TTM) = Based on earnings from the last 12 months (Trailing Twelve Months):🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low P/E may indicate undervaluation — or signal underlying issues.
- A high P/E may reflect strong growth expectations — or an overvalued stock.
📘 Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S)
📈 What is it?
The P/S ratio shows how much investors are paying for $1 of the company’s revenue – regardless of profitability.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
P/S is especially useful for evaluating growth companies or businesses not yet profitable. It reflects how the market values the company’s sales.
🧮 Calculation
Market Cap = $7.77b | Revenue (TTM) = $7.70b
Market Cap = $7.77b | Estimated Revenue = $7.96b
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low P/S may indicate undervaluation — or low profitability.
- A high P/S can reflect strong growth expectations — or excessive optimism.
- Especially helpful when evaluating companies where profits are low, volatile, or negative.
📘 Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales)
📈 What is it?
EV/Sales shows how much investors are paying for $1 of revenue — considering not just equity, but also debt and cash. It’s the capital structure–adjusted version of the P/S ratio.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It’s ideal for comparing companies with different levels of debt. It reflects a company's true cost relative to its revenue.
🧮 Calculation
Enterprise Value = $9.77b | Revenue (TTM) = $7.70b
Enterprise Value = $9.77b | Forward Revenue = $7.96b
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- EV/Sales allows for capital structure–neutral company comparisons.
- A lower ratio may indicate undervaluation; a higher one may signal strong growth expectations or overvaluation.
- Especially helpful when evaluating high-growth companies with low or negative earnings.
📘 Enterprise Value to Free Cash Flow (EV/FCF)
📈 What is it?
EV/FCF shows how many years it would take for a company to "pay back" its enterprise value using its free cash flow.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It focuses on real cash generation, ignoring accounting noise — ideal for assessing profitability and value based on liquidity, not earnings.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low EV/FCF may signal undervaluation and strong cash generation.
- A high EV/FCF might reflect weak recent cash flow or aggressive growth expectations.
- Best suited for stable, mature businesses with predictable free cash flows.
📘 Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B)
📈 What is it?
The P/B ratio compares a company’s market value to its book value — showing how much investors are paying for each dollar of net assets.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
P/B is commonly used for asset-heavy industries like banks or industrials. It helps assess whether a stock is trading above or below its net asset value.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A P/B below 1 may signal undervaluation — or weak profitability.
- A P/B above 1 implies the market expects future value creation (e.g., brand, IP, growth).
- Best used for companies with tangible assets and strong balance sheets.
📘 Equity Ratio
📈 What is it?
The equity ratio indicates what portion of a company’s total assets is financed by shareholders’ equity – in other words, how much it relies on its own capital.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
A high equity ratio reflects financial strength and stability, especially during downturns. It’s a key indicator of a company’s solvency and long-term risk profile.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Companies with high equity ratios are generally more resilient and less dependent on external debt.
- Low equity ratios can signal higher risk or aggressive financial strategies.
- Important: Always assess the equity ratio in combination with the return on equity (ROE). This shows not just how stable the company is – but also how efficiently it uses shareholder capital.
📘 Return on Equity (ROE)
📈 What is it?
Return on equity (ROE) shows how efficiently a company uses its shareholders’ equity to generate profit. In other words: how much net income is earned per dollar of equity.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
ROE is a core profitability metric. It helps investors understand whether a company delivers attractive returns on the capital provided by its shareholders.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high ROE indicates that the company is using its capital efficiently and profitably.
- It’s especially meaningful for capital-intensive businesses or firms with high equity bases.
- Important: A very high ROE can also result from high debt levels – always interpret it alongside the equity ratio to assess financial health.
📘 Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
📈 What is it?
ROCE measures how efficiently a company generates profits from its total capital – including both equity and interest-bearing debt.
🧮 How is it calculated?
It evaluates the return on all capital employed, regardless of how it’s financed.
🏛️ Why is it important?
ROCE is ideal for comparing companies with different financing structures. It shows how well management uses capital to create value for both shareholders and creditors.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high ROCE means the company uses its capital efficiently – regardless of whether it's funded by debt or equity.
- The higher the ROCE compared to peers, the more value the company creates with its invested capital.
- Especially relevant for capital-intensive sectors like industrials, energy, or infrastructure.
📘 Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
📈 What is it?
ROIC measures how efficiently a company generates returns from the capital invested in its core operations – regardless of whether the capital comes from equity or debt.
🧮 How is it calculated?
- NOPAT = Net Operating Profit After Taxes
- Invested Capital = Operating assets minus non-interest-bearing liabilities
🏛️ Why is it important?
ROIC is one of the most accurate indicators of capital efficiency. Unlike return on equity, it is not distorted by leverage and shows how much value is created for all capital providers.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high ROIC shows how effectively a company uses the capital that is truly invested in its core operations.
- Unlike ROCE, ROIC focuses only on the capital that is actively used to run the business – and that requires a return (i.e. interest-bearing).
- Especially useful when comparing companies with large amounts of excess cash or non-interest-bearing liabilities – giving a more realistic picture of capital efficiency.
📘 Leverage Ratio (Debt-to-Equity)
📈 What is it?
The leverage ratio indicates how much a company relies on interest-bearing debt (such as loans and bonds) relative to its shareholders’ equity.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
This ratio helps assess a company’s financial structure and risk profile. High leverage can enhance returns – but also increases exposure to interest rate changes and financial stress.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low leverage ratio signals financial strength and independence.
- A higher ratio can improve returns in good times but increases risk during downturns or rising interest rate periods.
- 👉 Always interpret in the context of industry, capital intensity, and interest rate environment.
📘 Revenue
📈 What is it?
Revenue shows how much a company earns in total from selling its products and services – the gross income before any costs are deducted.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Revenue is one of the key figures to assess a company’s size, market position, and growth potential.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Growing revenue indicates rising demand and can be an early signal of future earnings growth.
- Comparing actual and expected revenue reveals trends in the market environment and analyst sentiment.
- Note: Strong revenue alone isn’t enough – margins and profitability matter just as much.
📘 EBITDA
📈 What is it?
EBITDA stands for “Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization.” It reflects a company’s operating profit before the effects of financing, taxes, and accounting depreciation.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
EBITDA is widely used to evaluate a company’s operating performance – especially across capital-intensive sectors or international comparisons.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high or growing EBITDA indicates strong operational profitability – independent of taxes, interest, or accounting methods.
- It’s especially useful for comparing companies across sectors or geographies.
- Important: EBITDA is not a net income figure – it excludes key costs like depreciation and interest.
📘 EBIT
📈 What is it?
EBIT stands for “Earnings Before Interest and Taxes.” It reflects a company’s operating profit after depreciation, but before interest and tax expenses.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
EBIT is a core profitability metric that shows how well the company performs in its main business operations – independent of capital structure and tax environment.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high EBIT indicates strong profitability from the company’s core business – before financial and tax effects.
- It allows better comparison between companies with different debt levels or tax structures.
- Compared to EBITDA, EBIT already accounts for depreciation and reflects capital intensity more clearly.
📘 Net Income
📈 What is it?
Net income is the company’s total profit – the amount left after all expenses, taxes, interest, and depreciation have been deducted.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Net income is the most comprehensive measure of a company’s profitability – showing how much actual profit remains after all business and financing costs.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Growing net income indicates that the company is managing all of its costs efficiently.
- It directly influences valuation metrics like P/E ratio and the company’s dividend capacity.
- Over time, net income trends reveal how resilient and profitable the business model really is.
📘 Free Cash Flow (FCF)
📈 What is it?
Free Cash Flow shows how much actual cash remains after a company covers its operating expenses and capital expenditures.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
FCF reflects a company’s real financial strength – regardless of accounting profits. It shows how much flexibility a company has for dividends, share buybacks, or debt reduction.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- High free cash flow means the company generates real, usable cash – independent of reported net income.
- It’s often the most reliable base for sustainable dividends and buybacks.
- Declining FCF can be an early warning sign – even when profits appear stable.
📘 Revenue Growth
📈 What is it?
Revenue growth shows how much a company’s sales have changed compared to the previous year – both on a trailing basis (TTM) and based on forward projections.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Forward = (Expected revenue ÷ Revenue in prior year − 1) × 100
Forward growth is based on analyst estimates for the current fiscal year.
🏛️ Why is it important?
Rising revenue signals growing demand, business expansion, and market share gains – especially important for growth-oriented companies.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Growth is the engine of long-term value creation – especially in tech and growth sectors.
- What matters is not just current growth, but its sustainability.
- Forward projections reflect whether analysts expect continued momentum – or a slowdown.
📘 EBITDA Growth
📈 What is it?
EBITDA growth shows how much a company’s operating profit (before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) has increased or decreased compared to the previous year.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Forward = (Expected EBITDA ÷ EBITDA from prior year − 1) × 100
The forward estimate is based on analyst projections for the current fiscal year.
🏛️ Why is it important?
Growing EBITDA indicates improving operational profitability – regardless of financing or accounting effects.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Strong EBITDA growth signals operational efficiency and scalability – especially during growth phases.
- EBITDA growth can be an early indicator of margin and earnings expansion – but should be assessed alongside revenue and EBIT.
📘 EBIT Growth
📈 What is it?
EBIT growth shows how much a company’s operating profit (after depreciation, but before interest and taxes) has increased compared to the previous year.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Forward = (Expected EBIT ÷ EBIT from prior year − 1) × 100
The forward estimate is based on analyst projections for the current fiscal year.
🏛️ Why is it important?
EBIT growth is a direct indicator of a company’s business performance – taking into account capital intensity through depreciation.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Rising EBIT signals improving operating profitability – even after accounting for depreciation.
- It’s especially important for evaluating companies with significant capital expenditures.
- Combined with revenue and EBITDA growth, EBIT growth provides a well-rounded view of operational progress.
📘 Net Income Growth
📈 What is it?
Net income growth shows how much a company’s bottom-line profit has increased or decreased compared to the previous year – both on a trailing basis (TTM) and based on analyst projections.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Forward = (Expected net income ÷ Net income from prior year − 1) × 100
The forward estimate reflects analysts’ expectations for the current fiscal year.
🏛️ Why is it important?
Net income is the ultimate measure of profitability. Growing net income signals stronger efficiency, cost control, and sustainable earnings power.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Stronger net income boosts valuation, dividend potential, and investor confidence.
- If profits stall while revenue grows, it may signal margin pressure.
📘 Free Cash Flow Growth
📈 What is it?
Free cash flow (FCF) growth shows how a company’s available cash – after covering operating expenses and capital expenditures – has changed compared to the previous year.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Free cash flow reflects real financial strength. Growing FCF indicates more flexibility for dividends, share buybacks, and reinvestment.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Declining FCF may point to rising investments, increasing costs, or weaker operating performance.
- Especially for dividend investors, FCF growth is critical – since dividends are paid from actual available cash.
- A negative trend isn't always bad, but it deserves closer attention.
📘 Gross Margin
📈 What is it?
Gross margin shows how much of a company’s revenue remains after deducting the direct costs of goods sold (like materials and production). It represents the company’s “raw profit” before fixed costs, taxes, and interest.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Or simply: Gross Margin = Gross Profit ÷ Revenue × 100
🏛️ Why is it important?
Gross margin indicates how efficiently a company can produce or procure what it sells. It is a key measure of product-level profitability and pricing power.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high gross margin suggests strong pricing power and efficient production.
- Falling margins may signal rising input costs or competitive pressure.
- Compared to peers, gross margin offers insights into the quality of a business model.
📘 EBITDA Margin
📈 What is it?
The EBITDA margin shows how much of a company’s revenue remains as operating profit before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization.It reflects operating efficiency without being distorted by financing or accounting factors.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
The EBITDA margin reveals how much operating income a company generates per dollar of revenue – independent of capital structure and tax effects.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high EBITDA margin reflects strong core profitability – before accounting distortions.
- It allows for effective comparisons across companies and sectors.
- A stable or growing margin signals efficient cost control and business scalability.
📘 EBIT Margin
📈 What is it?
The EBIT margin shows what percentage of revenue remains as operating profit after depreciation but before interest and taxes.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
The EBIT margin reflects a company’s core profitability while accounting for capital intensity (e.g. machinery, infrastructure). It’s especially useful for comparing businesses with different levels of depreciation.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high EBIT margin shows that the company remains efficient even after factoring in depreciation.
- It’s especially relevant for capital-intensive industries.
- Stable or rising EBIT margins over time are a strong indicator of pricing power and business quality.
📘 Net margin
📈 What is it?
Net margin shows how much of a company’s revenue remains as bottom-line profit after deducting all costs, interest, taxes, and depreciation.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Net margin reflects a company’s overall efficiency – across operations, financing, and taxation. It shows how much actual profit is generated from each dollar of revenue.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high net margin means the company is not only strong operationally but also manages financing and taxes efficiently.
- Peer comparisons reveal business quality and competitiveness.
- Declining margins despite revenue growth can be a red flag for rising costs or inefficiencies.
📘 Free cash flow margin
📈 What is it?
The free cash flow (FCF) margin shows how much of a company’s revenue remains as actual free cash after covering all operating expenses and capital expenditures.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
This margin reflects the true liquidity generated by the business – independent of accounting rules or depreciation. It’s especially relevant for dividends, buybacks, and reinvestment decisions.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high FCF margin means a company consistently generates strong cash flow.
- It’s a positive signal for financial stability and shareholder returns.
- The long-term trend is key – a declining margin may indicate rising investments or weakening operating efficiency.
📘 Earnings per share (EPS)
📈 What is it?
Earnings per Share (EPS) shows how much profit is attributable to a single share – and is one of the most important metrics for evaluating a company's performance.
🧮 How is it calculated?
The diluted share count reflects potential new shares that could be issued through options, convertible bonds, or other rights.
🏛️ Why is it important?
EPS is the basis for many key valuation metrics like P/E ratio, PEG ratio, or payout ratio. It enables comparisons of profitability across companies, regardless of their size.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- EPS captures per-share profitability and is especially useful for comparisons over time or with analyst estimates.
- Rising EPS may signal consistent growth or share buybacks.
- Important: Always use diluted EPS for more realistic valuations – especially in companies with stock-based compensation.
📘 Free cash flow per share (FCF per share)
📈 What is it?
Free Cash Flow per Share shows how much free cash flow a company generates per outstanding share – after investments, but before dividends or debt repayments.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Free cash flow is calculated as operating cash flow minus capital expenditures (CapEx).
🏛️ Why is it important?
FCF per Share reveals how much real cash is available per share – useful for dividends, buybacks, or reducing debt. Unlike net income, free cash flow is harder to manipulate and often seen as a more reliable metric.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- High FCF per share signals strong financial flexibility.
- It shows how much capital the company can effectively reinvest or return to shareholders.
- Particularly relevant for dividend payers and capital-efficient businesses.
📘 Short interest
📈 What is it?
Short interest indicates how many shares of a company are currently sold short – that is, borrowed and sold by investors who expect the price to decline.
🧮 How is it calculated?
It reflects the percentage of a company’s shares that are being shorted relative to the total shares available.
🏛️ Why is it important?
Short interest serves as a sentiment indicator: A high value may signal skepticism or bearish expectations – but also increases the potential for a short squeeze if prices rise unexpectedly.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Low short interest usually indicates market confidence in the company.
- High short interest can be a warning sign – or an opportunity if sentiment shifts.
- Especially relevant in volatile markets or ahead of key earnings releases.
📘 Employees
📈 What is it?
The employee count shows how many people a company employs worldwide – offering insights into its size, structure, and business model.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It helps assess operational scale, labor intensity, and cost structure. Combined with revenue and profit, it enables key metrics like revenue per employee or productivity.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high headcount can signal operational complexity – but also significant growth capacity.
- Revenue per employee is a key indicator of efficiency.
- Especially useful for comparing tech, industrial, or service-heavy companies.
📘 Turnover per employee
📈 What is it?
Revenue per employee indicates how much revenue a company generates on average per employee – a key measure of efficiency and productivity.
🧮 How is it calculated?
The employee count is typically taken from the most recent annual report.
🏛️ Why is it important?
This metric helps compare business models – especially between labor-intensive and technology-driven companies. A high value suggests automation, operational efficiency, or strong value creation per head.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high revenue per employee indicates a scalable and margin-strong business model.
- A low figure may reflect labor-intensive operations or lower value-add.
- Especially helpful when comparing tech companies to industrial or service sectors.
Core & Main Stock Analysis
Analyst Opinions
19 Analysts have issued a Core & Main forecast:
Analyst Opinions
19 Analysts have issued a Core & Main forecast:
Core & Main Events
Past Events
|
SEP
9
Q2 2027 Earnings Call
7 days ago
|
|
JUN
10
Q1 2027 Earnings Call
3 months ago
|
|
MAR
24
Q4 2026 Earnings Call
6 months ago
|
|
DEC
9
Q3 2026 Earnings Call
9 months ago
|
|
SEP
9
Q2 2026 Earnings Call
about one year ago
|
StocksGuide Free
Core & Main — Q2 2027 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Hello, everyone. Thank you for joining us, and welcome to the Core & Main Q2 2026 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions]
I will now hand the conference over to Landon Althoff, Vice President of Investor Relations. Landon, please go ahead.
Good morning, and thank you for joining us. I'm Landon Althoff, Vice President of Investor Relations at Core & Main. We appreciate you taking the time to be with us today for Core & Main's Fiscal 2026 Second Quarter Earnings Call. Joining me this morning are Mark Witkowski, our Chief Executive Officer; and Robyn Bradbury, our Chief Financial Officer. Brad Cowles, our President, is also with us and will be available for the question-and-answer portion of today's call. Mark will begin with a business update, highlighting our quarterly performance and the continued momentum across the business, including large project opportunities, greenfield expansion and our M&A pipeline. Robyn will follow with a review of our financial results and outlook for fiscal 2026. We will then open the line for questions before Mark wraps up with closing remarks.
As a reminder, our press release, presentation materials and the statements made during today's call may include forward-looking statements. These are subject to various risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations. For more information, please refer to the cautionary statements included in our earnings release and our filings with the SEC. We will also reference certain non-GAAP financial measures during today's discussion. We believe these metrics provide useful insight into the underlying performance of our business. Reconciliations to the most comparable GAAP measures are available in both our press release and the appendix of today's investor presentation.
Thank you again for your interest in Core & Main. I'll now turn the call over to our Chief Executive Officer, Mark Witkowski.
Thanks, Landon, and good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us today. During the second quarter, we delivered growth in sales, adjusted EBITDA and EPS with momentum building across the business. We see it in our healthy backlog, growing participation in large complex infrastructure projects and increased activity across our acquisition pipeline. Combined with our strong cash generation and balance sheet flexibility, Core & Main is well positioned to capitalize on the opportunities ahead, drive long-term growth and create value for shareholders.
Net sales in the second quarter were approximately $2.1 billion, up 2.5% compared with the prior year. Adjusted EBITDA grew approximately 3% to $274 million, while adjusted EBITDA margin expanded 10 basis points to 12.8%, reflecting disciplined cost management and meaningful SG&A leverage. Adjusted diluted EPS was $0.94, an increase of 8% over the prior year. These results reflect consistent execution throughout the business.
Growth in the quarter was driven by continued strength in treatment plant solutions and fire protection, along with a growing contribution from data center projects, which has nearly doubled year-over-year. Treatment plant, data center development and other large-scale infrastructure work increasingly draw on what differentiates Core & Main, deep local expertise, strong supplier relationships and the technical and project support capabilities needed to execute reliably over the multiyear project cycles. As these projects become a more meaningful part of our growth profile, we continue investing in the capabilities and product breadth needed to capture the opportunity ahead.
We also continue to execute our long-term growth initiatives, expanded our footprint with new greenfield locations and advanced strategic opportunities across our M&A pipeline. Additionally, we put our strong cash generation and balance sheet flexibility to work and executed our second consecutive quarter of record open market share buybacks. Since our IPO, we have repurchased nearly 25% of the shares outstanding. Robyn will work through the details shortly, but these repurchases reflect our confidence in the long-term value of Core & Main and our disciplined opportunistic approach to allocating capital where we believe returns are most attractive.
Turning to our end markets. Municipal demand continued to be a source of strength. The long-term need to repair, replace and expand critical water infrastructure remains significant and continues to support investment across the municipal end market. The EPA estimates the U.S. drinking water, wastewater and storm water systems require more than $1.2 trillion of investment over the next 20 years to replace, rehabilitate and expand aging infrastructure.
After decades of underinvestment and deferred maintenance, many water systems face increasing pressure to replace aging infrastructure before failures, water loss and service disruptions become more frequent or costly. At the same time, municipalities are investing to improve water quality, comply with evolving regulatory requirements, expand treatment capacity, adopt smart utility technologies and support population-driven growth. These investments are essential, largely nondiscretionary and supported by a diverse mix of state, local and federal funding sources. The vast majority of municipal water infrastructure spending is funded at the state and local level, which helps support consistent investment activity regardless of the federal funding environment.
While the pace and timing of individual projects may vary, the underlying need remains clear. Water infrastructure continues to be a critical priority for municipalities and utilities, supporting our confidence in the opportunities ahead. Our treatment plant initiative delivered another quarter of strong double-digit growth and remains one of the most compelling growth opportunities within our municipal platform. Leveraging our deep municipal relationships, we continue to expand our product offering, technical expertise and project support capabilities to support a larger share of treatment plant projects.
As a result, treatment plant projects have grown to a mid-single-digit percentage of our sales mix with substantial opportunity for further expansion. We are particularly focused on increasing our mix of higher-value specialty products, which deepen our involvement and expand the content we provide on each project. With significant runway ahead, we see meaningful opportunities to grow this business through both organic expansion and strategic acquisitions.
Within smart utility, we continue to see strong underlying demand and are winning projects across municipalities and utilities of all sizes. Recent wins reinforce our confidence in the business' growth trajectory with a number of larger projects expected to continue over multiple periods as deployments ramp. We believe smart utility is well positioned to benefit from continued investment in system visibility, water loss reduction, billing accuracy and operational efficiency.
Within nonresidential construction, performance continued to vary across project types, but we saw encouraging strength across several key categories. Fire protection delivered another strong quarter with sales increasing 14%. Growth was driven by higher volumes on continued share gains and higher steel pricing. Momentum remains strong across the business, supported by our expanding geographic footprint, broad capabilities and a steady stream of project wins.
Data center development remains one of the most active areas of infrastructure investment today and continues to drive opportunities across multiple product categories. We support these projects from the earliest stages of site development, providing the water, wastewater and storm drainage infrastructure needed to prepare and serve these facilities. As construction progresses, we also provide the fire protection systems that support these critical assets. We continue to see a growing contribution from data center-related activity across our business.
The impact extends beyond the data center itself. These large-scale developments often require municipalities and utilities to expand water and wastewater capacity and can spur additional commercial and residential growth in surrounding communities. As a result, data center investments can create broader infrastructure demand over time. Residential lot development remained challenged during the quarter as expected, particularly in markets that benefited from strong development activity last year. While affordability concerns and higher interest rates continue to influence near-term activity, we expect comparisons to become considerably more favorable in the back half of the year.
Over the long term, the fundamentals remain strong. Population shifts, household formation and a structural housing shortage continue to support the need for additional residential development, giving us confidence in the long-term opportunity within this end market. As we look ahead, we continue to build for the long term, expanding our large project capabilities, extending our geographic reach and advancing opportunities across our acquisition pipeline.
Geographic expansion remains an important part of our growth strategy. So far this year, we've opened 7 new greenfield locations, including 2 recent openings in attractive markets where we see opportunities to improve our customer proximity, expand our reach and gain share. We evaluate new locations based on market size, infrastructure demand, customer needs and our competitive position. While greenfield locations require investment and time to mature, they allow us to strengthen local relationships, expand service capabilities and build market density over time. We are on track to open a record number of greenfield locations this year, extending our national capabilities into new and underpenetrated markets.
Alongside our organic expansion efforts, we continue to see compelling opportunities to grow through M&A. Following quarter end, we completed the acquisition of Walker Industries, a provider of storm drainage products in Hawaii. This acquisition broadens our product offering in the market, complements our existing operations and represents just one example of a growing number of larger opportunities ahead.
More broadly, our M&A pipeline has meaningfully accelerated. We continue to advance discussions across a range of opportunities, including acquisitions that expand our geographic footprint, broaden our product offering and capabilities and strengthen our position in attractive end markets. These opportunities span a range of transaction sizes from complementary bolt-on acquisitions to larger strategic transactions.
Many of these businesses are seeking a long-term partner that can provide additional resources, expand product breadth and future growth opportunities while preserving the local relationships that have driven their success. For Core & Main, these acquisitions expand the solutions we can offer customers, help simplify increasingly complex projects and create opportunities to deepen customer relationships and drive long-term growth.
Our customer-focused operating model, strong culture, long record of successful integrations and commitment to local market leadership continue to resonate with business owners, and we believe Core & Main remains uniquely positioned to be that partner. Supported by our strong balance sheet, ample liquidity and proven acquisition playbook, we remain well positioned to pursue opportunities that expand our capabilities, extend our geographic reach and create long-term value for shareholders.
With that, I'll turn it over to Robyn for the financial update.
Thanks, Mark, and good morning, everyone. I'll begin on Page 7 of the presentation with an overview of our second quarter results. Net sales increased 2.5% to $2.1 billion with volume, price and acquisitions each contributing positively. As Mark mentioned, municipal demand remains a key source of strength, supported by a broad range of activity across water and wastewater infrastructure. Within nonresidential, activity was led by data center construction, offset by ongoing softness in light commercial and retail. Residential lot development remained challenged against a tougher prior year comparison, in line with our expectations. Pricing was up slightly in the quarter as increases across much of our portfolio more than offset lower year-over-year PVC pricing.
Gross margin was approximately 26.7%, similar to the prior year as benefits from our margin initiatives, including private label, were offset by normal shifts in project mix and a stabilizing price environment within certain product categories. Our private label and sourcing initiatives remain on track and continue to support our long-term margin objectives. Total SG&A was approximately $301 million, roughly flat with the prior year period, while improving approximately 40 basis points as a percentage of sales. Notably, we held SG&A dollars flat while growing net sales 2.5% even as we continue to invest in greenfields, growth initiatives and acquisitions. This was enabled by disciplined cost management and executed savings initiatives that offset inflation and supported our strategic investments.
We delivered adjusted EBITDA growth of approximately 3% to $274 million compared with $266 million in the prior year period. Strong SG&A leverage drove a 10 basis point increase in adjusted EBITDA margin to 12.8%. Adjusted diluted earnings per share increased 8% to $0.94 compared with $0.87 in the prior year, marking another quarter of strong per share earnings growth. The result reflects growth in adjusted net income and the benefit of a lower diluted share count resulting from our substantial share repurchase activity.
Turning to the balance sheet, cash flow and capital allocation. We ended the quarter with net debt of approximately $2.2 billion and net debt leverage of approximately 2.3x within our target range. Total liquidity was approximately $1.5 billion, including over $300 million of cash, with the remainder primarily available under our ABL facility. Operating cash flow was $62 million during the quarter and $144 million throughout the first half of the year. Our cash generation reflects disciplined working capital management and the strength of our asset-light business model. As is typical with the seasonality of our business, we expect the majority of our operating cash flow generation to occur during the second half of the fiscal year. Over the last 12 months, we've generated a free cash flow yield of 7.5% of our market capitalization. That's more than double the average of S&P 500 companies and meaningfully above specialty distribution peers.
During the quarter, we further strengthened our capital structure through refinancing transactions that extended our debt maturities and enhanced financial flexibility. These actions position us to support future growth opportunities while maintaining a strong and flexible balance sheet. Our strong cash generation and balance sheet flexibility also allowed us to return significant capital to shareholders during the quarter. We deployed $169 million to repurchase 3.7 million shares, marking our second consecutive quarter of record open market repurchases. Including buybacks completed subsequent to quarter end, we have now deployed nearly $270 million to repurchase approximately 5.7 million shares during fiscal 2026.
Since our IPO, we have deployed nearly $2 billion to repurchase approximately 58 million shares, representing almost 25% of the shares outstanding at the time of our IPO. This level of capital deployment reflects our ability to generate strong cash flow and our confidence in the long-term value of Core & Main. At the same time, our balance sheet and liquidity continue to provide substantial flexibility to invest organically, expand our greenfield footprint, pursue acquisitions and return capital to shareholders through opportunistic share repurchases.
Turning to our outlook. We are affirming our full year guidance for net sales of $7.8 billion to $7.9 billion, adjusted EBITDA of $950 million to $980 million and operating cash flow conversion of 60% to 70%. We remain confident in our ability to deliver our full year outlook. Our second quarter results demonstrated the strength of our operating model, driving meaningful SG&A leverage and adjusted EBITDA margin expansion. Continued strength in fire protection, treatment plants, data centers and record greenfield openings are increasing our visibility into demand and reinforcing that confidence. Backed by a strong balance sheet, substantial liquidity and consistent cash generation, we are well positioned to continue generating profitable growth while returning capital to shareholders through share repurchases over the short, medium and long term.
With that, we'll open the line for questions.
[Operator Instructions] Your first question is from the line of Brian Biros with Thompson Research Group.
2. Question Answer
Municipal, again, called out as a source of strength. Can you maybe just talk a little bit more about the end market, kind of, where we sit today? I know you provided some high-level details in the prepared remarks. But maybe if you could talk a little bit more direct to the quarter or even the near term. I think there may be some mixed views on that end market, just how strong it really is or can continue to be. So maybe just talk about, kind of, what you're seeing in that segment on the ground would be helpful.
Yes, sure. I'll take that one, Brian. Thanks for the question. So, I'll start talking about municipal. And, I would say, overall, the market is vastly in line with what we expected and in line with what we've been seeing over the last couple of quarters. Municipal continues to be strong, stable, steady, kind of up in that low single digits range, good funding sources, consistent repair and replacement activity, and that's an end market that we expect to be strong and stable as we go forward.
On nonresidential, it was kind of flattish to maybe up slightly a little bit in the quarter. Most project types within nonresidential are on the weaker side, especially that traditional or light commercial type of work, but it's really being uplifted by data center activity. And as you heard in our prepared remarks, we're seeing a lot of really good data center activity and a lot more projects for us there. So, that's really what's helping hold nonresidential up.
And then residential continues to be more of the same. We saw that decline in the back half of 2025. It hasn't really moved up or down since that point in time. So it was down, kind of, high single digits or so in the quarter. Those comps for us do get easier in the back half of the year as we anniversary the decline in last year. So expect that the residential market would be flattish to down slightly in the back half of the year and residential would be down, kind of, mid-single digits for the full year.
Got it. Helpful. And then second question for me maybe on the fire protection share gains there. can you talk more about that? I guess, just how are you measuring kind of what counts as a share gain? Who you think you're taking share from large competitors or mom-and-pops? And I guess what's kind of triggering that customer to switch to the Core & Main offering?
Yes. Thanks, Brian. This is Mark. I'll take that one. We've been really pleased with the performance of our fire protection product line here over the last, I'd say, 12 to 18 months. It's definitely been supported by increases in steel pricing that we've laid out. So that's been a portion of the strong growth. But definitely from a volume perspective, they're seeing the same kind of softness across the construction of the rest of the businesses, but seeing a lot of really good share gains really across the board. We have had some white space in the fire protection area. So we've added some really good locations here over the last couple of years that are benefiting from share gains.
And I'd say beyond that, we've been a very consistent, kind of, reliable partner to our contractors that we do work with there. And I believe we've been taking share really from, I'd say, various other competitors across the board of all sizes. So that team is really firing on all cylinders right now. They're just doing a great job. So real pleased with the performance there.
Your next question comes from the line of Matthew Bouley with Barclays.
I wanted to touch on the overall guide for the year. So obviously, unchanged. Question is really just around some of the moving pieces in that. It seems like in the quarter, maybe you got a little bit of positive price. On the other hand, at least the gross margin was a little bit lighter than our own model. So maybe if you can kind of dive into those couple of pieces. Is the gross margin coming in any lower than you guys expected internally? And kind of what would be some of the offsets within the overall guide there?
Sure, Matt. Thanks for the question. So, you're right. The guide is unchanged. Everything is coming in line with our expectations. Market is really in line with what we expected. EBITDA is in line with what we expected. Margins are down from the first quarter, which can happen. We can see variability from quarter-to-quarter, but we really made up for that on the SG&A.
So, if we look into like the second half of the guide, we expect our EBITDA rate to be positive year-over-year. Expect that to be mostly driven by the fourth quarter, but do expect for the full year to get a little bit of improvement in gross margin and a little bit in SG&A to meet that guide. And overall, we're confident in our gross margins being supportive and our SG&A being supportive in meeting that EBITDA guidance for the year.
Okay. Got it. That's helpful. And then secondly, just diving into the smart utilities and the meters business. I mean it looked like, at least in the commentary that you may have had some positive price there. And I wasn't sure if the volumes had actually pulled back a little bit in that business. So maybe you can kind of -- if there's anything there around large project timing or just kind of your broader visibility into how the smart utilities business may play out here into how you're expecting the second half of the year in that segment?
Yes. Matt, thanks for the question. This is Brad. I'll take this one. There was a little bit of price, but volume was essentially flat. It didn't go backwards at all. So, it's kind of netted out to about that plus 1% for the quarter. We see in that business pretty good fundamental flow on our -- think of the business we've got as an installed base across a growing list of municipalities as our smart utility initiative has had tremendous success, particularly in the recent years, we've got a pretty good installed base. And that installed base is performing well. It's delivering kind of that groundswell of flow. We are winning an increasing number, as we've talked about, of really large and exciting smart utility projects that are of significant size and complexity. And I think with that definitely comes some challenges getting some of these projects started. The early phases of these large projects have a lot of variability in the timing, pilot phases, all sorts of interesting challenges to overcome.
And so we are seeing a little bit of a large project start timing impact here that's keeping us, kind of, in that flat range on top of that great run rate business. But we have a tremendous backlog. We do continue to win some projects, medium, large that are going to give us some exciting execution, we think, starting latter in the year into 2027 for sure.
Your next question comes from the line of Matt Johnson with UBS.
I guess my first question is on pricing. I know last quarter, PVC pricing was, I think, a bigger topic, but it sounds like a lot of those price announcements from earlier this year didn't really stick. So I guess could you guys just kind of give us an update on what you saw in terms of municipal PVC pipe pricing through the quarter, your expectations into the back half? And then also, I guess, kind of similar to that, but different is just on HDPE pricing, what you've seen there given the similar disruption in the resin costs?
Yes. This is Brad again. I'll take that. Just kind of what I'm seeing from the field. We -- there were a lot of price signaling when we talked at the last quarter that prices might go up. And we were -- we didn't have full confidence in that. We weren't seeing in this particular end market, the likelihood of that price sticking, and that's why we weren't overly excited about changing anything with respect to PVC price.
On the bright side, we're encouraged that PVC pricing has kind of stabilized and been in a pretty flattish mode as opposed to its continual decline that we've been living through for the last period. So that part of it has been pretty good. But we have just seen an inability, I guess, of the market given where it's at to support any pricing increases. So net, we continue to remain steady with pricing and on PVC, we see it kind of sitting there for the time being. We don't really have any indication until demand really picks up in those end markets that are heavy PVC consumers that that's likely to change.
And on HDPE, I'll hand it over to Mark.
Yes, Matt, I'll cover the HDPE. We've got 2 different pipe categories there that utilize that kind of product. There's corrugated HDPE that goes into the storm drainage market, and then there's fusible HDPE that's used across the various different applications. I would tell you on the corrugated HDPE storm drainage side, I'd say the pricing in that area has been relatively steady. On the fusible HDPE side, it's a little bit more of a commodity type product. It's a very small percentage ultimately of what we sell, but that has seen some spikes recently. The disruption in the Middle East definitely impacted resin. That product typically follows some of those resin spikes. So we've seen some increases there with pricing in that category. A little bit of a mixed bag just depending on the nature of that application.
That's great. Appreciate that color. And then I guess if I could just follow up on the meters business. Is there any update you guys could give or have just on the status of the Miami-Dade contract and when that could begin shipping? And just any additional color on kind of the timing or magnitude of some of these additional large project wins you guys talked about. And I guess also just bigger picture, I guess, as you guys mix towards more of these large projects moving forward in the meters business, is there any sort of margin impact we should think about there as you guys take on some of those additional services?
Yes, I'll take that one. Let me see if I can unpack all of that. Starting with Miami-Dade, that's the largest project we think there's ever been in this space, and we're excited to be a part of it. That said, it probably exemplifies the amount of pilot work and prework that has to be done before that project really hits its stride. We're anticipating -- in fact, we're in the middle right now of a number of small pilot stages that are going to start to ramp up. We think we'll see some Miami-Dade volume move towards the end of the year. It will be a relatively small percentage of the overall project, somewhere between 5% and 10%, I would estimate. And then we fully expect by 2027 for that to hit its full run rate. It's about a 5-year project implementation. So, that's -- it's a pretty strong number, 100,000 meters being installed and connected to the systems per year is approximately what we would expect. So pretty significant volume, the most significant we've done. But with that, there's a lot of challenges and a lot of moving parts that we just continue to manage with our team there.
On the -- some other -- just one mention I'll make. We were able to win a project with Connecticut Water that's a pretty substantial scale, and that's pretty exciting for us. We've become a really strong metering smart utility player in our Northeast region, which has really paired up perfectly with our core waterworks distribution growth in the area. Again, that's a pretty substantial project. So, it's got a lot of work between here and the starting point of getting that really up and running. So, that's pretty characteristic of what we're seeing, a nice win like that popping up every now and then and a number of smaller ones along the way.
And then I think your final question was talk about pricing. The larger these projects, there can be a competitive nature there where you got to be at the right price and you got to partner with the best manufacturers to get the solution in place. But the solutions that we provide, which do extend into services and software and integrations and the like, those can carry some exciting margin profiles along with it that kind of tends to blend up, if you will, any volume effects that we might have on pricing in the project. So we see them as pretty much in line with the rest of our meter business, which is still kind of to the exciting side on the margin line.
Your next question comes from the line of Joe Ritchie with Goldman Sachs.
This is [ Anvi ] on for Joe. I just wanted to follow up on the gross margin piece. I know you discussed it briefly in your prepared remarks as well. But I'm just trying to understand or like bridge into the back half. Can you touch upon some of the puts and takes, be it product mix, end markets, even the pricing comments that you made? What would it really take to see a sequential or even a year-on-year expansion in the back half? And then what are some of the things, maybe private label, if you could size the benefit coming from that as well?
Yes, sure. Thanks for the question. So, we had a really good gross margin in the first quarter. We always can expect fluctuation from quarter-to-quarter depending on seasonal mix, project mix and timing. The way that our gross margin works is it's very local, and it's based on local project wins. And with some of that seasonal mix and project mix can come with some lower SG&A and some lower load for the branch and favorable EBITDA rate, which is what we saw in the quarter.
As we look into the back half of the year, we do expect EBITDA expansion, like I mentioned, in the back half of the year, most of that driven by Q4. We expect overall EBITDA margin expansion and expect that to be driven a portion by gross margin and a portion by SG&A. We do have a kind of a tougher margin comp in Q3 versus Q4, so we would see, kind of, more of a year-over-year margin benefit in Q4 versus Q3.
From an SG&A standpoint, as we start to see growth in the back half of the year, we'll be able to leverage that more. And so, should see some good SG&A leverage in the back half of the year given our cost-out actions plus some growth that we can leverage in the back half.
Got it. That's helpful. And if I can just follow up on the M&A and the greenfield activity that you've seen. It was good to see the 7 greenfield locations opened year-to-date. I think from an M&A standpoint, like what would you call out as your key focal points today in terms of market, where are you seeing the attractive opportunities? And then how are you balancing some of this incremental buyback that you're doing against the M&A?
Yes. Thanks for the question. I'll take that one. I think what's most exciting about our strategy that we have to grow this business is that we're fully capable given our cash flow characteristics of delivering on all 3 fronts there. So, we continue to invest in the business organically. You've seen that through the greenfield additions there. We added 3 locations kind of the western part of the U.S. 2 locations kind of in the Southeast area and then 2 up in Canada, where we continue to build out our presence in that market. So, that's been really exciting growth for us.
I would say, over the last 12 to 18 months, the M&A activity that we've seen in the market has just been pretty limited. We've been able to complete some M&A, as you've seen despite it just being limited opportunities. But we've seen that, I'd say, pick up pretty significantly here over the last 3 to 6 months, and I've been really excited about the opportunities that have come across our desk that our team has sources from a proprietary standpoint, and then we've seen some other ones kind of come to market. So it's been exciting to see that activity pick up. We've advanced now several, I'd say, through the LOI stage. So, we're making some really good progress there.
And I'd say the focus there continues to be what we've looked at historically, which is continued bolt-ons right in line with kind of the core waterworks business and fire protection. And then we look for ways to continue to add complementary products and solutions to our offering that fit right with our existing customer base. So, no change in focus there and really, really like what we're seeing. And given some of the actual M&A activity has been a little lighter that we've closed over the recent quarters, we've been able to do a lot of repurchase activity in the market as well. So again, we've got all 3 of those opportunities, and we'll continue to look at it and deliver on that going forward.
Your next question is from David Manthey with Baird.
Good to hear on the M&A pipeline. And from what I'm hearing you say, Mark, it was just a, for whatever reason, a lack of targets that were available and that has since started to free up. Am I hearing you right on that?
Yes, that's exactly it, Dave. Yes.
Okay. Main question here is on the major commercial projects and data center. Can you size those for us just in terms of percentage of your sales that are going to some of these major projects? I assume data center is a low single digit, but could you just sort of frame what that is for you? And then second, there's a lot of talk around water usage at these data centers. And I'm just wondering from a Core & Main standpoint, as you're selling into these, does it matter if the data center is a traditional evaporative situation or if they're engineering that to be more of a closed loop or zero water system?
Dave, this is Brad. I'll try to unpack all of that. First of all, on the size, we we've said that the data centers, especially as they become such a widely dispersed phenomenon across the country, it plays so well into our strength because we've got branches everywhere, as you know, they're all outstanding service providers and have great local relationships. And when a data center gets built in a place like Indiana, ultimately, the people that are putting the underground water utilities or treatment plant into the area are local, and we own those relationships.
And so as that has been occurring, we've seen our data center project run rate, as Mark said, we've doubled this quarter year-over-year, which is pretty exciting from my seat. That's taken it from, I would say, low single digit to the mid-single-digit range in terms of our total business. And what's exciting for me is we've talked about data center kind of making up for a lot of drag in the classic light commercial work that has been a mainstay for years, offices and retail and the like. The data center is now in the high single-digit range as a percentage of our nonresidential work. So it's great for us. We're well positioned. It looks a lot like our core business. It's not significantly different from a technical perspective. It just requires an elevated level of service, and that's what we're really good at.
So again, it's kind of a sweet spot, meet sweet spot, and we're pretty excited about it. As far as the types of demand, different data centers and their cooling approaches, almost all data centers have some mix of cooling that can be recirculated or there's a lot of HVAC component that still evaporates a lot of water. Regardless, they need water. And so sometimes the water volumes we're delivering are higher, sometimes they're lower. But it's always good and it always leads to a pretty material percentage of the project being underground water utility.
And then I think one of the biggest switches that can flip is whether the local municipality is already prepared or not to supply treated water to that data center or whether there needs to be some private investment in water treatment, either on-site or near site or some other public-private coupling to kind of accelerate local water demand. So we're kind of excited about the first order effect of the data center itself. And then that second order effect is just increasing municipal water demand from that business and all the businesses that grow up around it.
That's helpful. And I guess what we're seeing with electricity, it sounds like you're seeing a similar effect on the water side to sort of bring your own water as opposed to just tapping into the municipalities. Is that what you're saying?
That is what I'm saying, and it's an interesting comment because there's sort of a trade-off between how much electricity you have to spend cooling versus how much water you can evaporate to cool. So we kind of -- the data centers are trying to find those locations where they can get both, and they often cannot get both and get one or the other. And so more electricity for the closed-loop systems to refrigerate that water and move the heat. And if not, they need more water to evaporate. So it's kind of driving general municipal demand for energy and water, whichever way you price it.
Your next question comes from the line of Sam Reid with Wells Fargo.
I wanted to dig a little bit deeper into resi. You mentioned on the call that the comps obviously get easier in the second half, which is great. Can you just decompose a little bit more what you're embedding specifically in the second half for resi relative to the high single-digit decline in the second quarter?
Sure, Sam. I'll take that one. So, for resi, the way that the year is trending, it was down about low double digits in the first quarter. In the second quarter, it was down kind of high single digits. And then in the back half of the year, when we anniversary the decline, we expect it to be flat or maybe down slightly. So overall, that gets you to, kind of, a mid-single-digit down on residential. But that doesn't assume residential gets any better or worse. It's been kind of bumping along at the same levels, and that's what we've got assumed in the overall guide. So, that assumes, kind of, flattish overall markets for the full year.
That's helpful, Robyn. And then switching gears here, there are some questions that we're getting on ARPA funding rolling off at the end of this year. So just curious your perspective on how much that was potentially benefiting the muni segment through 2026? And then also, just any updated perspective on highway funding initiatives, mixed reads there, but you've heard potentially some of that coming in light. So just curious any implications.
Yes. Sam, I would tell you, just in general on municipal funding, we definitely have heard some mixed messages in the market. I would just reiterate that the vast majority of the funding of the type of work that we do in the municipal area is funded through those local water municipalities and the rates they charge the consumers, and we've continued to see that as a positive from the standpoint of they continue to look to pass rate increases to help close the funding gap between the need for those municipalities to upgrade their systems and the funding they have available. So, that overall, kind of, big large pocket of funding continues to rise.
And then beyond that, there's been additional funding mechanisms at the state and federal level that have been supportive in the backdrop, ARPA funding being one of them. So that was helpful. I'd say back several years ago, and obviously, funding is coming off, but you've had the increase in the IIJA money that sits at that state level that's now been kind of fully allocated down to the states, but municipalities have just pulled a small portion of that to the local level.
So, there's plenty of federal funding out there to go get. It becomes whether the municipalities have the capacity and resources to go through the requirements and regulations to go get that funding. So, I don't see that as any kind of a risk or slowdown with that federal side of it, and we're really positive on the fact that the 50,000-plus municipalities still continue to work to try to get the value of water to align more with what the needs are and continue to believe that will be a good backdrop to support our municipal end market demand over the next several years.
Your next question comes from the line of Anthony Pettinari with Citigroup.
On fire protection, I was wondering if it's possible to parse out the sales growth that you saw in the quarter between volume and price. And given the strength in the category, do you run into kind of tougher comps in the second half? I'm just wondering if you could talk about sort of the sustainability of the strength you've seen there.
Yes. Thanks for the question. And like mentioned earlier, we're really excited about the fire protection product line and the growth that we've had there. For the quarter, it was split between price and volume, a little bit more weighted towards volume. A lot of that driven by share gain and performance and things like that. But there was about 2/3 of it of the growth or so that was pricing related, specifically related to steel pricing. And then as we get into the back half of the year, the fire protection product line has been performing well for a while now, but I wouldn't say that the comps are meaningfully different. We do expect to see a good finish to the year for fire protection.
Great. Great. That's very helpful. And then maybe just kind of a random one. With Canadian tariffs do you see any impact on product price hikes or products across the border or just demand at your Canadian branches, like, any potential impact there?
Yes. No, thanks for the question. At this point, we don't see any major movement there. Our exposure in Canada, as we sit here today is still pretty light relative to the overall business. But at this point, as we unpack all the tariffs and retaliatory tariffs there between the countries, we don't see any major implications [indiscernible] today.
Your next question comes from the line of Mike Dahl with RBC Capital Markets.
Robyn, just to go back to the gross margin dynamic one more time, understanding there's always elements of mix that can produce differentials. I think your guidance or your comments that gross margin will still end up slightly for the full year would require you to be back in that 27-ish range in the back half, so up sequentially. So can you be a little more specific about some of the mix dynamics or other drivers that you see in the second half that would produce that slight uptick relative to what you just posted in 2Q?
Yes, sure. And it depends what we see in the back half of the year as far as project mix. And like I said, a lot of that is local and kind of those local project wins will help drive some of that. But if we do see gross margins a little bit lower in the back half, then we would expect to see lower SG&A to come along with that. But as far as the project mix, like I said, we see -- we can see sequential declines from the first quarter to second quarter. Some of that given seasonality, there's projects that are more underground, there can be more direct ship, so there can be less demand on that local branch, less variable costs associated with that.
We also -- it is -- our underground business is more seasonal. So as you see quarters like the first quarter when we have areas like fire protection that's less seasonal. We've got more of a private label mix in there. So it can vary from quarter-to-quarter. But the good news is that if that gross margin is a little bit lower because of project mix, then we would expect the SG&A to be lower. And so that would help support the EBITDA margins overall.
Okay. Yes, that's helpful, understanding that it really is just that mix dynamic, not necessarily getting squeezed on something idiosyncratic to gross margin.
The second question, I mean, just a little more near term. Can you talk through kind of the growth. How we exited the quarter and what you're seeing quarter-to-date? And obviously, you maintained the full year sales guide, but maybe a little more color on how 3Q is shaping up so far would be great.
Yes, sure. I'll take that one. As we exited the second quarter, I'd say we felt really good with the momentum building, especially into July and then August reflected that momentum as well. So that's what gave us those couple of points that we saw some good acceleration that was supportive of the bidding activity and the project wins that we were seeing. So that felt really good. And as we talked about some of the comps on resi that's been a headwind for us get a little easier.
Now obviously, we're not expecting resi to get a lot better, but it helps to have a little softer comp in the back half and allows a lot of the progress that we've made with many of our growth initiatives to shine more without that headwind. And that, coupled with the stability we've seen with PVC, has -- should put us in a good position to show some really good growth here in the second half.
Your next question is from the line of Keith Hughes with Truist.
How much did acquisitions add in the quarter? I know it's a small number, but what is it exactly?
It's a little less than 1 point, Keith. So, we had 2.5% growth in the quarter, and we had volume, price and acquisitions all contribute slightly to that 2.5% growth.
And you made some positive comments earlier in the call about potential deals coming down the pipe in a slow period here. Assuming you get a reasonable number of those, what kind of future growth would those represent to sales?
Yes, Keith, we've laid out in terms of our long-term strategy, we expect M&A to contribute in the, kind of, 2 to 4 points of growth range. And obviously, in the recent year or 2, we've been under that. So, it's possible we could exceed that in any given year as activity picks up, but we generally expect it to be in that kind of 2 to 4 points of incremental sales growth just based on our long-term strategy. And I tried to highlight that we've got several that kind of advanced through that LOI stage, and we're in diligence now. So, expecting a good finish to the year and should set us up for some really good growth in 2027.
Okay. Final question. You had talked very beginning of the call that the -- it was about mid-single-digit growth coming from the treatment centers. Is data centers part of that? Is that a separate number? I heard about high single digits of nonresi. I'm just trying to get the -- as a percentage of total sales, get it straight.
Yes. So Keith, treatment plant is, kind of, in the mid-single-digit percent of our overall sales, but it grew double digits in the quarter. So that's been performing really well. That's been an area that's been performing strong for us quarter-over-quarter. It's typically separate from data centers, we've been doing a lot of activity and making investments in treatment plant and growing that business. But, like Brad mentioned, there can be treatment facilities needed that go along with the data center. So, it can be both. It can be kind of core municipal water infrastructure treatment plant or it could be treatment plant growth related to water needs from data center activity growth.
So, in either regard, that area is growing well for us and growing overall, and we expect to see continued growth in treatment plants in the back half of the year.
Your next question comes from the line of Ryan Merkel with William Blair.
Mark, I think I heard you mention large projects, there was a bit of lumpiness. Can you talk about where that was and what some of the issues are? And then also if there's any better visibility to better releases in the second half?
Yes, Ryan, I think Brad referenced some of the project timing on some of the smart utility wins that we have. I'd say there's no issues or problems, but it's just a part of the nature of doing large meter implementations in a municipality. There can be various elements that impact the timing to really get those launched into full run rate. You've got multiple systems that a municipality is typically running that we're simplifying. I mean there's a number of factors that come into play. I wouldn't really indicate there's issues or challenges. It's just a matter of when those get off and running.
And then beyond that, just with large projects, I'd say that we feel really good about what's in the pipeline, but sometimes those can be just core water infrastructure projects can have delays with timing due to weather and various other factors in a particular market that impact timing and availability.
So, feel good with what's in the pipeline. As Brad mentioned, I think we'll see some of that smart meter release here in the second half and really get off and running in 2027 and continue to see a lot of great wins across the other large capital projects, like we've mentioned with data centers and other awards. So it's been, I'd say, mostly positive, just timing and when is all that going to really get out and shipped.
I see. Okay. That helps. And the second question because you said in the release that the smart meters was mostly price, the growth there. So, that's -- the volume is just sort of a timing issue, it sounds like. And what kind of pricing are you seeing on the smart utility side? How much did price contribute in the quarter?
Yes. Just a small amount of price increase there. Overall, the growth was 1 point of growth in the quarter, so a little bit of price. No offset on -- volume was neutral to slightly positive.
This concludes our Q&A session. I will now turn the call back to Mark Witkowski for closing remarks.
Thank you again for joining us today. We are pleased with the performance we delivered this quarter, but what excites us most is what we see ahead. Our growth and our margin initiatives are delivering results, and we are encouraged by the opportunities emerging across our acquisition pipeline.
Looking to the second half, we believe the elements of our growth framework are increasingly falling into place. End markets are stabilizing, large project activity is expanding, and we are seeing a growing set of opportunities to strengthen our business, both organically and through M&A. Combined with our demonstrated operating discipline and significant financial flexibility, these trends give us confidence in our ability to accelerate profitable growth and create long-term shareholder value.
Thank you for your continued interest in Core & Main. Operator, that concludes our call.
This concludes today's call. Thank you for attending. You may now disconnect.
Core & Main — Q2 2027 Earnings Call
Core & Main — Q1 2027 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Hello, everyone. Thank you for joining us, and welcome to the Core & Main First Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] I will now hand the conference over to Landon Althoff, Vice President of Investor Relations. Landon, please go ahead.
Good morning, and thank you for joining us. I'm Landon Althoff, Vice President of Investor Relations at Core & Main. We appreciate you taking the time to be with us today for Core & Main's Fiscal 2026 First Quarter Earnings Call.
Joining me this morning are Mark Witkowski, our Chief Executive Officer; Robyn Bradbury, our Chief Financial Officer; and Brad Cowles, our President. Mark will start with a business update. Brad will then discuss the value of Core & Main is providing across our smart utility and treatment plant solutions initiatives. And Robyn will follow with a review of our financial results and reaffirmed outlook for fiscal 2026. After, we will open the line for questions, and Mark will wrap up with closing remarks.
As a reminder, our press release, presentation materials and the statements made during today's call may include forward-looking statements. These are subject to various risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations. For more information, please refer to the cautionary statements included in our earnings release and our filings with the SEC. We will also reference certain non-GAAP financial measures during today's discussion. We believe these metrics provide useful insight into the underlying performance of our business. Reconciliations to the most comparable GAAP measures are available in both our press release and the appendix of today's investor presentation.
Thank you again for your interest in Core & Main. I'll now turn the call over to our Chief Executive Officer, Mark Witkowski.
Thanks, Landon, and good morning, everyone. Thanks for joining us today. Before getting into the details of the quarter, it's helpful to frame the broader demand backdrop. The fundamental drivers of water infrastructure investment remained firmly intact, as utilities continue to prioritize essential water infrastructure systems that support public health and community growth creating resilient demand across our business. This demand provides a strong foundation while our diversified end market exposure helps balance near-term uncertainty and supports our performance through cycles.
Against that backdrop, we delivered a solid start to fiscal 2026 with first quarter net sales of $1.9 billion, adjusted EBITDA of $226 million and adjusted diluted EPS of $0.72. These results reflect disciplined execution and the underlying resilience of our business and support our confidence in the full year outlook we communicated in March. Our associates across the business remain focused on execution and serving our customers, leveraging the competitive stress of Core & Main. Our local teams bring the knowledge experience to help customers navigate the most complex projects, simplifying their supply chains and ensuring the efficient flow of materials to keep critical infrastructure projects moving forward. That local relationship-driven model supported by our national scale and capabilities continues to differentiate Core & Main and positions us to deliver long-term value for our customers and shareholders.
Turning to our end markets. Municipal demand remained strong during the quarter and continues to serve as a core source of growth for the business. Activity is supported by aging water infrastructure, essential repair and replacement work and the largely nondiscretionary nature of municipal spending. These needs extend well beyond any single federal funding cycle and reflect a long-term modernization required to keep critical water, wastewater and storm drainage systems operating reliably for communities. Approximately 95% of water infrastructure funding is supported by state and local sources, reinforcing the durable, locally driven nature of this market and we continue to see a sustained pipeline of projects. These characteristics reinforce municipal as our most stable end market and provide a strong foundation through varying economic conditions.
Nonresidential demand remains mixed across project types and geographies, but overall activity has been stable. We are seeing healthy momentum in certain project types, including data centers, in manufacturing facilities with fire protection sales benefiting from strength in data center and multifamily construction activity as well as higher steel prices. Data centers continue to gain momentum, and we are securing a steady stream of new project wins across multiple regions of the country. These projects are particularly attractive for our business given the significant water infrastructure required to support cooling systems as well as the broader downstream demand they create within surrounding communities.
We see data centers as a compelling long-term growth opportunity for Core & Main. These projects require significant investment in water, wastewater, storm drainage and fire protection infrastructure and involve complex multiphase project life cycles that align well with our technical capabilities, product breadth and execution expertise. Our national scale sourcing strength, dedicated project teams and technical resources, combined with the deep relationships and local market knowledge of our branch network, position us well to capture this opportunity. We are seeing strong bidding activity and customer engagement across multiple regions, reinforcing our confidence in this growth driver. Strong data center and manufacturing activity has largely offset softness in traditional commercial construction. Residential markets remain challenged with year-over-year declines against the strong prior year comparison.
As a reminder, residential lot development started out with optimism in the first quarter of fiscal 2025. But activity pulled back as we move throughout the second quarter and softened further in the back half of the year. Since then, conditions have largely stabilized. While we have not seen further deterioration relative to how we exited fiscal 2025, we have also not seen a meaningful improvement, which is in line with our expectations. Near-term activity will continue to be influenced by interest rates and affordability, but we remain optimistic on the long-term outlook given the structural undersupply of housing and meaningful pent-up demand. Our teams remain focused on driving above-market growth through the strength of our value proposition and the execution of our product, customer and geographic expansion initiatives.
For example, treatment plant and smart utility solutions, including advanced metering infrastructure, software, analytics, installation and ongoing support delivered double-digit and high single-digit growth during the quarter, respectively. This performance reflects the breadth of our capabilities, which extend well beyond product distribution, just supporting customers across the full life cycle or infrastructure needs. Over time, we have invested in both local and national resources to deepen our technical expertise, expand project support and broaden customer coverage, enabling us to serve a wider range of projects at greater scale and complexity. It also reflects growing customer demand for solutions that improve system visibility reduce water loss and drive more efficient infrastructure operations.
Brad will cover this in more detail shortly. Technology also continues to be an important differentiator for Core & Main and a key enabler of our long-term growth strategy. We are focused on leveraging our industry-specific proprietary digital tools and developing AI-enabled solutions to improve productivity, enhance the customer experience and simplify workflows for both our associates and customers. Our capabilities in these areas of focus help deepen customer relationships, improve execution across our network and further reinforce our differentiated value proposition. We also continue to expand our geographic footprint, opening 5 new greenfield locations in attractive markets during the quarter. We are well on track to open a record 8 to 10 greenfield locations in fiscal 2026. These openings further strengthen our local service model while extending the benefits of our national scale and capabilities into new or underpenetrated markets.
Alongside our greenfield expansion, we see a best pipeline of acquisition opportunities across our highly fragmented industry. We remain actively engaged on a number of high-quality opportunities to expand our capabilities, extend our geographic reach and add strong local talent and customer relationships. These opportunities would broaden our product and solutions offering, expand our addressable market and deepen our technical expertise further strengthening our position as a trusted partner for municipal water infrastructure projects. We see particular opportunity to continue building out our treatment plant capabilities where we have a strong foundation and a clear path to advancing toward more comprehensive turnkey solutions similar to what we have achieved in smart utility.
While timing can vary, the pipeline remains very active and M&A remains a core pillar of our growth strategy, and we're confident in our ability to execute as these opportunities advance. Our gross margin initiatives continue to deliver structural improvement. In the first quarter, we expanded gross margins 50 basis points year-over-year, driven by continued growth in private label sourcing optimization and disciplined pricing execution, consistent with the trajectory we've demonstrated in recent quarters. We generated strong operating cash flow during the quarter, supporting continued reinvestment in the business while returning meaningful capital to shareholders through share repurchases.
Fiscal year-to-date, we have deployed $125 million in repurchases, approximately 80% of what we did in all of fiscal 2025. Robyn will cover our cash flow and capital allocation in more detail shortly. We're proud of our team's ability to execute in a dynamic environment. their consistent focus and discipline, combined with the strength of our business model positions us well to continue creating value for our customers and shareholders.
I'd like to now turn it over to Brad to spend a few minutes on 2 areas that continue to be important municipal growth drivers for Core & Main, smart utility and treatment plant solutions, which are strong examples of how we create value through differentiated capabilities. Both categories benefit from the breadth of our platform, deep technical expertise, and ability to support larger, more complex customer projects, which continue to drive above-market growth.
Over to you, Brad.
Thanks, Mark, and great to be with you all today. Smart Utility and treatment plant solutions continue to be compelling municipal growth opportunities for Core & Main and clear examples of how we translate differentiated capabilities and targeted investments into sustained above-market growth. Across the country, municipalities and private utilities are increasingly focused on modernizing aging metering infrastructure to improve billing accuracy to reduce nonrevenue water, enhanced system visibility and operate more efficiently as their networks become more complex. These projects are primarily funded through local rate adjustments and operating budgets. Many municipalities are still reliant on manual read or drive by systems and these legacy systems still represent a majority of the connections in the United States.
They are labor-intensive, less reliable and increasingly difficult to manage at scale. Advanced metering solutions with real-time 2-way communication address these challenges while also enabling efficiencies in customer self-service and billing for the back office and advanced analytics, proactive maintenance planning and water loss prevention for the operations staff, but they also introduced complexity around technology integration, project sequencing and long-term life cycle support. As a result, customers are looking for partners that can deliver complete solutions, not just hardware. That's where Core & Main continues to differentiate. We have a leading position in smart utility solutions with access to leading manufacturers and technologies. But what truly sets us apart is how we bring these solutions to market.
We provide an integrated turnkey offering that combines hardware, software, analytics, installation, project management and ongoing service through a single trusted partner. We support customers across the full project life cycle from early assessment and system design through installation and deployment to software integration and long-term maintenance. This model reduces execution risk, shortens implementation time lines and simplifies what are often multiyear mission-critical projects. Our ability to consistently execute at scale has enabled us to win larger, more complex contracts, including multiyear smart utility programs with some of the country's largest municipal and private utilities. When successfully implemented, these projects can often help municipalities reduce future cost increases to their end users.
In our last call, we highlighted being awarded what we believe is the largest smart utility contract in U.S. history. That momentum continues in 2026 with several additional large and multiyear project wins. These municipal customers increasingly rely on Core & Main for system design, network infrastructure, software and analytics, installation and even ongoing support throughout the life of the asset. Our recent wins underscore the demand across municipalities of all sizes from some of the largest utilities in the country to midsized and local communities, reinforcing the broad and durable nature of this opportunity. We have invested significantly to scale and enhance these capabilities. We built dedicated national smart utility and project management teams, expanded our installation and service footprint and strengthened partnerships with leading technology providers.
These partners include over a dozen software and analytics companies, along with a growing network of sensor hardware innovators which we bring together to provide cutting-edge solutions to our municipal customers' biggest challenges. Leveraging metering and acoustic leak detection data, we provide utility operators with advanced analytics and predictive failure models that help optimize capital deployment for proactive waterline replacements, alongside turnkey billing solutions and customer self-service portals. Together, these investments allow us to support projects of virtually any size and complexity level while still leveraging our strong local customer relationships on the ground. A similar execution model underpins the strong municipal growth we're seeing in our treatment plant business.
Treatment plant modernization has become an important priority for utilities as facilities age regulatory requirements increase and communities face greater demands on water and wastewater systems. These projects are supported by a mix of funding sources, including local utility budgets, state revolving funds and other public programs, but they're ultimately driven by the essential need to maintain and modernize critical infrastructure. As a result, we continue to view investment in treatment plant infrastructure as a durable long-term opportunity. Treatment plant solutions are inherently complex, requiring deep technical expertise, precise coordination and the ability to deliver highly specified products. We've made targeted investments to expand dedicated national treatment plant teams with engineering, estimating and project management capabilities.
Our investments are focused on broadening the scope of products, solutions and projects we can support from local facility upgrades to large multiyear regional treatment plants. As we scale, our ambition is to follow the needs of the customer and evolve towards a more integrated solutions and services model similar to the capabilities we have built in smart utility. Organic investment will continue to drive that evolution while M&A provides an opportunity to accelerate the expansion of our treatment plant platform. Today, treatment plant represents one of our fastest-growing product initiatives, consistently delivering double-digit growth as customers increasingly turn to Core & Main to help execute these critical infrastructure projects. Importantly, these projects tend to be less cyclical, highly visible and closely aligned with our core municipal relationships.
Together, smart utility and treatment plant solutions illustrate the power of our model strong local relationships backed by national scale, technical expertise and disciplined investment. This scalable and repeatable approach has supported approximately 15% and 25% net sales CAGRs in smart utility and treatment plant, respectively, over the past 5 years and continues to drive meaningful share gains across both categories. Importantly, the growth we're delivering in these areas is tied to steady, long-term customer needs, modernizing infrastructure, improving system efficiency, reducing water loss and better serving communities. We remain highly confident in the municipal end markets and our ability to continue driving above-market growth as utilities seek partners that can execute complex projects reliably and at scale.
I'll now turn it over to Robyn to cover our financials.
Thanks, Brad, and good morning, everyone. I'll begin on Page 8 of the presentation with an overview of our first quarter results. Net sales were in line with prior year at $1.9 billion. Organic volumes were down approximately 1% year-over-year, while acquisitions contributed about 1 point of growth. As a reminder, this performance is against a strong prior year comparison when we delivered approximately 10% growth in end markets, particularly residential were more supportive. Overall, we estimate end market demand was down low single digits in the quarter, driven primarily by a year-over-year decline in residential lot development on a tough prior year comparison, partially offset by healthy municipal growth.
Municipal volumes were supported by repair and replacement activity, the largely nondiscretionary nature of these projects and continued growth in market share gains across our smart utility and treatment plan initiatives. Nonresidential markets continue to show healthy activity across several project types, including data centers, but were offset by softer demand in light commercial construction, particularly retail and office-related activity. Residential softness was driven by weakness in the Sunbelt markets. This reflects slower lot development activity versus a stronger prior year comparison. We saw steady residential lot development in the first quarter last year before a pullback in the second quarter and further declines in the back half of fiscal 2025.
Sequentially, residential demand was stable relative to the fourth quarter and in line with our expectations. Overall, pricing was stable during the quarter with increases across most of our product portfolio balanced by a year-over-year headwind from PBC. While PVC pricing remained below prior year levels, it has been stable sequentially, and we are beginning to see supplier price increases which could become a modest sequential tailwind going forward. Gross margin in the first quarter was 27.2%, up approximately 50 basis points versus the prior year. This improvement was driven by continued private label growth, sourcing optimization and disciplined pricing and purchasing execution. Total SG&A expenses increased 2% to $299 million. This was primarily driven by strategic investments in growth, acquisition-related costs and impacts of inflationary increases. Excluding the 3-point impact of investments and M&A declined modestly year-over-year, reflecting strong cost management. Adjusted diluted earnings per share increased approximately 6% to $0.72 compared to $0.68 last year.
Growth was driven by higher adjusted net income and the benefit of lower share count from share repurchases. We were pleased with the 6% growth in a soft market, reflecting our continued focus on execution. Adjusted EBITDA of $226 million was 1% above the prior year, and adjusted EBITDA margin increased 10 basis points to 11.8%, driven by 50 basis points of gross margin expansion.
Turning to the balance sheet, cash flow and capital allocation. We ended the quarter with net debt of $2 billion and net debt leverage of 2.2x, well within our target range. Liquidity was nearly $1.4 billion, including $150 million of cash, with the remainder available under our ABL facility. Operating cash flow was $82 million, an increase of $5 million compared to the prior year quarter. Over the last 12 months, we've generated free cash flow yield of 6.4% of our market capitalization. That's more than double the average of S&P 500 companies and meaningfully above specialty distribution peers. It's also worth noting that consistent with the seasonal profile of our business, the majority of our annual cash generation is expected in the second half of the fiscal year. We returned $88 million to shareholders through share repurchases during the first quarter, reducing our share count by roughly 1.8 million shares, our highest level of open market share buybacks in a single quarter. Including additional repurchases after quarter end, we've already repurchased 2.5 million shares through fiscal 2026, representing roughly 80% of our total buybacks for all of fiscal 2025.
This level of capital deployment reflects the strength of our cash generation profile and the confidence we have in our business while maintaining a strong balance sheet and liquidity position. That financial flexibility allows us to continue balancing shareholder returns with continued reinvestment in strategic growth opportunities. Looking forward, we will remain opportunistic with share repurchases, supported by strong cash generation while also maintaining the flexibility to pursue attractive growth investments in M&A that maximize long-term value.
Turning to our outlook on Page 10. We are reaffirming our full year guidance we issued in March, including net sales of $7.8 billion to $7.9 billion adjusted EBITDA of $950 million to $980 million and operating cash flow conversion of 60% to 70% of adjusted EBITDA. We continue to expect overall end market volumes to be roughly flat for the year, with strength in municipal markets, supported by durable funding sources and the nondiscretionary nature of demand. offset by a continued cautious outlook in private construction. Overall, we continue to expect to drive above-market volume growth through our sales and geographic expansion initiatives including strength in smart utility and treatment plant solutions as well as the opening of a record 8 to 10 greenfield locations in attractive markets.
As we previously mentioned, we have seen recent supplier price increases in PBC, which could provide a modest tailwind as we move through the balance of the year. At the same time, elevated geopolitical uncertainty could weigh on end market volumes across residential and certain nonresidential categories through impacts on interest rates, affordability and consumer confidence. Our reaffirmed guidance range reflects these dynamics. On profitability, we continue to expect adjusted EBITDA margin expansion through execution of our gross margin initiatives the realization of benefits from previously announced cost actions and leveraging our fixed cost structure as we grow. Operating cash flow is also expected to remain strong, and our capital allocation priorities remain unchanged.
We will continue to invest in the business to drive long-term growth while returning capital to shareholders through share repurchases. We remain confident in the strength of our business and our ability to execute. Our operating model has proven resilient across varying market environments, and we continue to deliver disciplined pricing, expand margins, generate strong cash flow and gain share.
With that, I'll open the call for questions.
[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Matthew Bouley with Barclays.
2. Question Answer
Maybe just starting off on the guide. So obviously, no change to the full year EBITDA guide. So maybe a fairly simple question here. But I'm just curious if within that guide, if anything, has changed within kind of the moving pieces, whether we're thinking end markets year-to-date, obviously, your comments there on inflation and potential PVC pipe price increases, really just does anything kind of tracking a little bit different versus your initial expectations kind of 90 days into the year.
Matt, thanks for the question. Yes, on the guide, we maintain the guide and left it where it was given that we're still in the first quarter. Everything has come in line come in pretty much in line with our expectations. So the market has been in line with our expectations. Nothing has really changed from a market standpoint on what we're expecting. I would say the only thing that's a little bit different is pricing, and I'll give you a little bit of color on the way that we're thinking about that. But pricing was about flattish in the quarter. Virtually every product category was either flat or up.
PVC was a headwind just given the timing of the declines in the prior year. We have started to see price increase announcements from our suppliers, but we haven't seen that hit our revenue numbers yet. So possible for there to be a little bit of upside in the back half of the year. But as a reminder, PVC will still be down year-over-year even if we do get some uplift. What we have seen is that we've seen it stabilize over the last couple of months, and that's been very positive for us, but not expecting it to be a major driver as we go throughout the rest of the year. So given all of that and the uncertainty still with the macroeconomic environment, we thought it was prudent to leave the guide where it is, could cause some additional inflation or tougher markets. So with all of those things in mind, the guide is maintained.
Okay. Perfect. Secondly, maybe on meters and smart utilities, Brad gave really great detail there around kind of what's differentiated about your strategy. So I'm not going to ask you to rehash that. But maybe to just kind of hit on some of the specific debates, you hear from some of the challenges with the OEMs more specifically over the past 3, 6 months, et cetera. So maybe if you can -- obviously, it's hard to know what's kind of going on exactly at other companies. But maybe you kind of touch on a little bit what you think may be different between what you're actually seeing and why what you're seeing is different than what a lot of these kind of OEMs are saying on the meter side?
Yes. Sure, Matt. I'll take that one. Our meter business has -- is rich with these big projects where we are kind of uniquely positioned to take a number of solutions for different partners and integrate them. And that's where we're winning the really big long-term projects. And that pipeline is strong. I think we have a very high win rate. And I think we're competing at the sort of the top of the heap in that slice of the meter world. But there's also for many, many years and remains -- there's a lot of meter sales that go on in our, call it, our everyday business and a lot of small meter systems that have been in place for years.
And those municipalities purchase meters on an ongoing basis, and that's driven by operations and maintenance, and it's also largely driven by things like residential expansion. And given that the residential market is soft, my suspicion there, and I think we see it in part of our business as well as that is -- that part of the meter market is kind of flattish to not very exciting right now. we are sort of uniquely powering our way through it on the strength of these large projects. And depending on what type of technology platform, you're talking about with different meter manufacturers, they may be more concentrated kind of in that residential small project or just ongoing maintenance of those existing systems, where I can imagine they're seeing a little bit more pressure from just general residential slowness.
Your next question comes from the line of Matt Johnson with UBS.
I guess, first off, from a segment basis, I think fire protection sales were really the standout this quarter, up, I think, 17% year-over-year. And I think there's been some disruption at the OEM level over the past few months. So I guess, how much of the strength would you guys attribute to, call it, kind of share shifts within this vertical as opposed to kind of the core end market strength, I think you guys called out, I think, in multifamily and data centers. And I guess just any other thoughts you can share on the trajectory of your fire protection business this year.
Yes, sure. Thanks for the question. What I would tell you is we're really excited about the performance that we've seen within our fire protection product line. We definitely benefited from a couple of areas that are, I'd say, more market related. As we did point out, we're picking up a good chunk of the data center work there. with that activity. So we've seen some good progress there as those projects get more towards the completion stage as those buildings get finalized those fire protection systems are going in. So we've seen an uptick there. I'd say multifamily has been steady to a positive for us.
We pick up a lot of good fire protection material from a multifamily perspective. And then we have seen an uplift in steel pricing, and that had been I would say, at least about a couple of years of drag on the fire protection performance, as we've pointed out historically, so seeing some positive price there has helped that product line. And then I would tell you, our performance in that product line has also improved over the last, I'd say, 12 to 18 months. And I do believe we're picking up some share there. And for all those reasons, we've been really excited about that performance there.
That's great. I appreciate that, Mark. And then I guess if we could just talk a little more about the meters business, I think sales were up, I think, 9% in the quarter. I think that's relative to, I think, 12% organic volume last quarter. I guess any thoughts you guys can share on just the trajectory of that business moving forward, given I think the comp does get a lot easier next quarter. I enter any other kind of color or quantification you guys can share on some of the additional large contract wins that Brad mentioned.
Yes. I would tell you when you get down into a meter product line and you look at that performance on a quarter-to-quarter basis, it can move around a little bit more than the -- obviously, the overall business just given the very sizable projects that were awarded there. So you'll see that move around from time to time just based on the timing of when those projects release. And when we're shipping or -- obviously, there's a lot of installation that has to happen there, and a lot of things can adjust the timing of when we see those products go out the door.
So I wouldn't glean in anything on kind of a quarter-to-quarter basis as it relates to our meter product line, but as you've seen and what we've laid out for long-term kind of historical growth there. being in that kind of double-digit range is our expectation for the foreseeable future, just given the amount of projects and opportunities we see across the municipal network.
Your next question comes from the line of Joe Ritchie with Goldman Sachs.
I guess my first question is if you think about your different end markets as the year progresses, it seems like you're probably lapping your toughest comp from a residential perspective in Q1? I mean is it fair to assume that like we're at a bottom in volumes and that things should progress better as the year progresses? Just any color around that would be helpful.
Yes, sure, Joe. We tried to lay out a little bit of that in the prepared remarks, but I'll give you a little bit more color on kind of as we sit here today versus where we were last year at this time. Last year at this time, we really started to feel some of the momentum softening, in particular, in the residential end market. We started to see projects getting scaled back and felt like we were starting to lose momentum, and that clearly played out as we got into the second quarter and then more fully into the back half of 2025. I would tell you as we sit here today, while the end markets are coming in kind of as we expected, we do feel some momentum.
There has been a lot of good project activity, a lot of bidding activity. We've been awarded a lot of really good projects. gives us a lot of confidence about the back half of the year. We're just watching right now, just given all the uncertainty the macro and I think a lot of concern around energy cost, really what the timing of release is going to be on these projects. So probably some -- it's still a little bit of near-term uncertainty, but just given the fact that the backlogs are building really across all of our end markets and the bidding activity continues to be strong, that we feel like there's -- the momentum is there. So it's a matter of timing and when some of these things are going to release. So definitely feeling better than I'd say what we did kind of last year at this time.
That's helpful, Mark. And I guess my second question is like, look, really helpful to see the greenfield expansion continuing I guess, maybe just give us a little bit of color on like how you're prioritizing your locations? Are you following customers, a little bit more comment on this call around your data center business. are you now going to try to like overindex your expansion into more data center specific regions to follow that growth? Just any color there would be great.
Yes, sure. What I'd tell you on the greenfield side is, over the last, I'd say, 12 to 18 months, we've really had a, I'd say, a renewed focus on some real key markets across the U.S., and we've wanted to reinforce our position in some of those markets to capture what we believe is our fair share in some of those areas. And some of that has resulted in identification of some new greenfield opportunities. In other cases, it's maybe additional resources or new resources that we felt like we needed in some of those critical markets. And those are critical markets for us, one, because they're large, maybe there's much more of an opportunity that we see or in many cases, yes, there's a lot of good large project activity there that we want to be able to capture.
So we're going about it in all the various ways that you would expect for us to go after just with our organic growth initiatives. But those are kind of the key drivers is our looking at these key markets and developing the path to continue to grow and take the market opportunity that we see.
Your next question comes from the line of Sam Reid with Wells Fargo.
I wanted to touch on the meter business here a little bit more drilling deeper on your analytics and support -- just curious how big is that today in the context of your overall meter business? And did I hear correctly that it was tracking up double digits.
I would tell you in terms of the size, that's not as critical to how we think about it as it is additional capability that we provide the municipality to have another tool as we try to drive the demand of the overall meter upgrades and technology. So still, as you think about our meter product line, the meter, the software, the billing systems is a large chunk of the revenue pieces. But what we bring is a lot of other capabilities with that help drive the demand and get those meter systems in place. I would say it's a big growth area for us, but still relative to what we're driving in terms of meter revenue is still relatively small.
That helps. And then maybe switching gears back to data center, obviously very topical for all of us. Wanted to drill down, though and get a sense for -- are there any new product lines for vendors that you've added recently that are perhaps helping drive that strength in your backlog? And then any context in terms of just how much bigger the backlog is in data center now versus last year?
Yes, Sam, the data center work, there's a couple of things that are working in our favor, I would say, number one, data center markets have expanded like the geography that -- where they're looking for number 1 power and then land and water. So now there's 15 or 18 market concentrations, if you will, where data centers are being built. And because we're present in those markets or we're further investing in those markets, we're aligned really well with where that construction activity is starting to happen across the country.
Also, the data center project type, while what's unique about it is it demands a pretty high degree of precision, project management. You can't make mistakes. There's a high level of execution risk in those projects, and we are well suited to that. That's right in our sweet spot. We are typically aligned with the underground utility contractors in all those geographies who are the most renowned for having the capabilities to also deliver with excellence, and that's just being sought by the general contractors and engineers and owners. But the work itself is very, very much aligned with our core business. It's not requiring us to really move into any particular new product lines or areas or fabrications. We basically have all of the elements for data center underground Waterworks product in the core of our company. So it's playing to us really, really nicely.
Your next question comes from the line of Brian Biros with Thompson Research Group.
On treatment plants, you delivered double-digit growth this quarter. You've talked about how you build out the capabilities to support that great growth, I think 25% CAGR over the last few years. how large is treatment plants as a share of sales now? Kind of what does the backlog look like there? And maybe if there's any margin difference to consider?
I would tell you it's in the mid-single-digit range for us. And we continue to see, like you mentioned, good growth with the treatment plant side of the business and expect that to continue just given the capabilities that we continue to add. We see it as a an area that is going to continue to see good funding as we move forward. So I would tell you the other thing that's that we're focused on is continuing to expand the addressable kind of product that we can distribute into treatment plant facilities. And we've made a lot of good improvements in those capabilities, some of which we've done organically. And then we're also looking at ways to do that through M&A that continue to expand our capabilities, just given the outlook we see there for treatment plan going forward.
Got it. And secondly, if you have a new Board member recently from American Water, does anything change in how you kind of think about the regulated utility customer there or even anything beyond that in capital allocation or just any differences as expected?
Yes. Thanks, Brian. Yes, glad you pointed that out. We did add Susan Hardwick, former CEO of American Water to our Board. He's been a wonderful addition. She brings an incredible kind of customer perspective into our boardroom, and it's already adding I'd say, great value to our discussions. Nothing I would say it would change strategically what we're doing, but just adds a tremendous amount of credibility given her industry background. And I think our focus on municipal and the municipal customer inclusive of private water will continue to be major focuses of ours, and she brings us a great perspective on that.
Your next question comes from the line of Nigel Coe with Wolfe Research.
This is Will Vranka on for Nigel. I was first wondering on -- so the IA is to expire later this year. I was just wondering how material you think this could be for you guys? Is this funding that you'd expect to be funded by Congress. But any thoughts on what the potential impact could be there?
Yes. Thanks for the question, Will. I'll take that one. On IIJA, the remaining funding is expected to hit the state revolving funds this year. That doesn't mean that there's any cliff to the funding or there's any end to the funding. A lot of the funding has already hit the state revolving funds. Only about 1/3 or less of it has hit the municipality level yet. So there's still a lot of funding out there for municipalities to use and they can use that is going to be in the state revolving funds for them to use and utilize.
A portion of that funding is in the grant form and then the other portion is in low interest loan. So a portion of that would get repaid back into those state revolving funds and used for future sources. And then in addition to that, 95% of the funding that municipality is used for their water infrastructure is state and local, and we think that those are really strong. We're seeing municipalities increase water rates to their customers to be able to afford some of the upgrades we're seeing municipal bond growth in the municipal bond issuance that's going out there. So across the board on the federal state and local level, we see ample funding for the municipal infrastructure investments in the short, medium and long term.
Okay. Got it. That's really helpful. And then maybe for my follow-up, just to follow on to a couple of the prior question. Just on the data center and the treatment plant businesses. I know you've had a number of investments and initiatives on going there to grow those -- just any KPIs that you can provide on how those initiatives are progressing? And I guess, specifically as it relates to the number of salespeople that you brought on that you're targeting and what the expected contribution is there.
Yes. I would tell you, more so on the treatment plant side where it becomes much more of a technical sale. We've added, I'd say, dozens of resources into our national teams to support our local execution on those projects. So that's been a good area of growth. Some of those resources can also help with some of the other larger projects like data centers that are out there. But also, again, those projects, while large are really kind of core to what we do locally. So the existing resources, of which we have hundreds of sales teams and support resources in our local teams, support large and small projects that are kind of core to what we do.
So I'd tell you, dozens of additional resources to support those complex projects that then work across the regions and really do a great job of following those projects through from bid through completion.
Your next question comes from the line of Mike Dahl with RBC Capital Markets.
First one, Robyn, just to circle back on pricing and also maybe gross margin dynamics. You mentioned that you haven't seen the PVC price increases flow through to your revenues yet. I do think some of these increases were supposedly effective from the OEMs the past couple of months. So are you have you accepted price increases? And are you seeing that in your inventory? And can you kind of talk through whether there's anything assumed or kind of price cost differentials, either good or bad in the next couple of quarters? And if you could also -- gross margins were strong in the quarter. Was there any Were there any timing benefits on price cost helping that in 1Q?
Yes. Thanks for the question, Mike. So on PVC, we have seen price increases from our suppliers we have sequentially seen since the first quarter, we've seen -- we've started passing along some of those price increases through our bidding and quoting activities, but that's why I said we haven't seen them in our sales activity yet. We did do a little buying ahead of price increases on PVC and some of these other areas that are increasing. But we expect to see some of that in the majority of that would hit in the third quarter of things that we're bidding and quoting now that are sequentially higher on the price side for those PVC items, if that makes sense. And then on the gross margin side, really strong quarter for us for gross margin.
Our initiatives are performing well. Private label is really strong. Fire protection, we talked about being up. There's a lot of private label in our Fire Protection business. So that helps lift those margins up to. We're expecting for the remainder of the year for gross margins to kind of remain at this similar levels to what we exited the first quarter and throughout the year, which would be a gross margin benefit year-over-year for the full year.
Okay. Yes, that's very helpful. Shifting gears, I mean, the SG&A side, it seems like obviously, you've got some investments in there. But the cost outs are -- appear to have kind of provided some control kind of on an underlying basis, can you just update us on kind of the progress against those? What's left to realize as the end markets have remained in kind of relatively in more places? Or how are you thinking about your SG&A here and whether or not there are other actions or opportunities there to drive further leverage?
Yes. So SG&A for the quarter was up about 2%. And what I talked about earlier was about -- there's a point of that, that's M&A related. There's about 2 points that are kind of investments in things like greenfields and some of those resources we talked about to make investments into some of these big projects and complex projects. So we've continued to make investments to support future growth. We did have a couple of points of inflation in there, and then we've got a couple of points of those actions cost out savings that helped to offset some of that increase. So we feel like the -- our SG&A is well positioned. So as we go throughout the rest of the year and start seeing some growth in the back half, we'll be well positioned on our SG&A to see some good performance there. .
On the cost-out, pie, it's in line with what we expected. So we did that $30 million in the back half of last year, and we saw about a 1/4 of that benefit in the first quarter.
Your next question comes from the line of Collin Verron with Deutsche Bank.
I just wanted to circle back on the water treatment plants. Can you just dive a little bit more into what's going on in sort of that end market? Are these new implants? Are they upgrade sort of repair and break I guess just like how meaningful can these individual projects be for you guys from a revenue perspective? And maybe sort of dive a little bit deeper into sort of like the medium to longer-term kind of growth that this could provide you over the next several years?
Yes, I'll give you some color on that. I would say, first of all, treatment plan projects range in size from very, very small, let's call them rehabilitation or minor expansion all the way to completely new treatment plant construction. Actually, that is a rarer case, but a treatment plant facility can get completely retrofit in a sort of rehabilitation which is essentially for us a complete rebuild of all the workings of the plant and all the piping and fabrication and connectivity. So whether it's rehabilitation or completely new construction for us, it's almost the same end market exposure, which is great. .
That's what we see more often than not is new technology, new designs, getting more out of existing facilities by essentially redoing perhaps 1 or 2 lines at a time, the main flows through the treatment plant. We see this as it does not seem to be slowing. The funding has been strong. But I think more importantly, this is just a sort of a nondiscretionary investment that the municipalities are they must do because the demands on both clean water side and the sanitary sewer side, our end separating storm store for that matter, just continue to be constant challenges with movement of the population, some of these large capital projects that are demanding more water than ever. So we see it as a pretty durable long-term trend that is driving good growth for us. Obviously, as it gets bigger, those percentage growth rates are harder and harder to come by, but we still see this as a significant above-market driver of growth for us for the foreseeable future.
That's really helpful color. And then I guess I just wanted to touch on your expect maybe some more near-term expectations here. You called out the tough comp that you saw in the first quarter. I think you still saw like a high single-digit comp in 2Q, but the 2-year stack gets a little bit easier. So I guess I'm just trying to understand what your near-term sales expectations are around 2Q. Can you start to see growth here in the second quarter? And sort of any color on how trends have been in May and the first part of June.
Yes, thanks for the question. So if you remember, last year, we started to see the decline in residential in the -- really the back part of the second quarter. So May and June still had pretty decent performance from a residential standpoint before we really started to see that slowdown in July, we are expecting, I would say, some slight growth in the second quarter, with the majority of that growth kind of in the second half of the year where we have some easier comps and like we mentioned, we've been building momentum with bidding activity and backlog activity and expect a lot of that to release in the back half of the year. So flattish for the first quarter, a slight growth in the second quarter and then kind of that low to mid-single-digit growth in the third and fourth quarter of this year is how we're thinking about the seasonality. .
Your next question comes from the line of Keith Hughes with Truist.
Just one more question on the Trade Center business. You talked about some acquisitions around it. Are there specific entities and branches that just work on that end user market or referring to that or can you give us some detail what you mean there?
Well, first of all, the way that we -- a treatment plant project is ultimately going to be local, and it's going to need material, staging, packaging and generally, the more complex, the project, the more beneficial it is that we have a Core & Main store, if you will, close to the project to do all of that off-site material handling. But the teams that are executing the presale process, the design these alternative funding long iterate processes, they're engaged. Those teams are generally going to be concentrated at either the regional or at the national level, and they work out of various virtual offices around the country.
And as the project approaches execution time, there's sort of a relationship form with the branch that's going to carry the kind of actual logistics load, if you will. When we talk about acquisitions in this space, it's not so much the need for acquisition of our traditional footprint and know to be clear, there's not a branch that specifically does treatment plant product only as all of our branches can do treatment plant product work. the acquisitions are more as we expand our product offering, we're really, really proximate to the next part of the product that goes to the next step inside the plant like actuated valves or engineered pipe stands or different kinds of metal fabrications that make up the bodies of the plant.
And in order to sell those products, you have to have knowledge and credibility and expertise and that's more like what we're talking about when we look at M&A is how can we continue to bring more of that knowledge, expertise, talent and capabilities so that we can offer a more broad offering.
Okay. Let me ask a question on M&A, just a little bigger picture finish this off. M&A has been adding a modest amount in the quarter in recent quarters below what it was several years ago. Are you reaching a size you're very large now a large network. Are you reaching a size where acquisitions are just going to be a smaller amount in terms of added revenue in previous years? Or are we just a lull for deals right now?
Yes. Thanks, Keith. As I've mentioned on previous calls, we've definitely been in a lull from an M&A standpoint. And we haven't really seen a lot of deals in the space. So what we have seen, I'd say, more recently is a pretty notable uptick in the pipeline. There have been a lot more that have come across the desk recently. I would say I couldn't be more excited about some of the opportunities that we've seen that range from small tuck-ins right in the core to larger opportunities like you've seen us complete in the past and then some opportunities that are kind of right in the customer mix that we're talking about with municipal and treatment plan in some of these areas that could be really really great opportunities for us.
So we've advanced, I'd say, a number of them through our process and they're getting in the late stages. So you should expect that will get right back on track and if not overperform some of our M&A goals, there's no shortage of opportunities out there. it's been more of a timing and lumpiness just from an M&A availability standpoint, but really pleased with what I'm seeing right now.
We have reached the end of the question-and-answer session. I will now turn the call back to Mark Witkowski, CEO, for closing remarks.
Thank you again for joining us today. As we close out the quarter, we are in a position of strength to deliver above-market growth, both organically and through acquisitions. While we do not expect near-term tailwinds in residential, we see plenty of opportunities to capture growth within our municipal and nonresidential end markets, and we have the team and experience to deliver on our 2026 outlook.
Importantly, the long-term fundamentals underpinning our business remain firmly intact. The need to modernize aging infrastructure, support population growth and deliver reliable water systems continue to drive sustained demand. Combined with the investments we've made in the business and the depth and experience of our team, we remain confident in our ability to navigate the current environment and continue delivering durable long-term value for shareholders. Thank you for your continued interest in Core & Main. Operator, that concludes our call.
This concludes today's call. Thank you for attending. You may now disconnect.
Core & Main — Q1 2027 Earnings Call
Core & Main — Q4 2026 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Hello, and welcome to the Core & Main Q4 and Full Year 2025 Earnings Call. My name is Alex, and I'll be coordinating today's call. [Operator Instructions] I'll now hand it over to Glenn Floyd, Director of Investor Relations, to begin. Please go ahead.
Good morning, and thank you for joining us. I'm Glenn Floyd, Director of Investor Relations at Core & Main. We appreciate you taking the time to be with us today for our fiscal 2025 fourth quarter and full year earnings call.
Joining me this morning are Mark Witkowski, our Chief Executive Officer; Robyn Bradbury, our Chief Financial Officer; and Brad Cowles, our President. Mark will start with a business update and review of our fiscal 2025 performance. Brad will then discuss the investments we are making to drive market share gains and margin expansion over the long term. Robyn will follow with a review of our financial results and outlook for fiscal 2026. We will then open the line for questions, and Mark will wrap up with closing remarks.
Our press release, presentation materials and the statements made during today's call may include forward-looking statements. These are subject to various risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations. For more information, please refer to the cautionary statements included in our earnings release and in our filings with the SEC. We will also reference certain non-GAAP financial measures during today's discussion. We believe these metrics provide useful insight into the underlying performance of our business. Reconciliations to the most comparable GAAP measure are available in both our press release and in the appendix of today's investor presentation.
Thank you again for your interest in Core & Main. I will now turn the call over to our Chief Executive Officer, Mark Witkowski.
Thanks, Glenn, and good morning, everyone. I'll begin on Page 5 with a brief overview of Core & Main and its market position.
Core & Main is a leading specialty distributor of water infrastructure products and services in North America, supporting the repair, upgrade and expansion of critical water systems. Having a portfolio of more than 225,000 products, many of which are exclusive to our industry with limited distribution rights, we combine local expertise with national capabilities to provide water infrastructure solutions to municipalities, private water companies and professional contractors across municipal, nonresidential and residential end markets.
Our footprint consists of more than 370 branches across the U.S. and Canada, which serves as a crucial link between 5,000 suppliers and a diverse base of more than 60,000 customers. Our end markets are balanced and stable, providing resilience through varying demand environments. Municipal projects represent 44% of our sales, generating steady demand from reliable funding sources. Our nonresidential end market, which represents roughly 38% of sales, benefits from a diverse project mix across commercial, industrial and infrastructure applications. Residential lot development represents approximately 18% of our sales. And while near-term dynamics in this end market remain challenged, we continue to view the long-term outlook as attractive, supported by population growth and a structural undersupply of housing. This diversification, combined with emerging growth drivers like AI-related infrastructure needs and treatment plant modernization provides a strong foundation for our business.
Our competitive advantages, including local market expertise backed by our highly trained sales force, national capabilities and industry-specific technology, position us to lead an attractive $44 billion addressable market across the U.S. and Canada, up roughly $5 billion from last year with the addition of Canada. We estimate our U.S. market share at approximately 20% today with a small but growing share in Canada. This combination gives us significant runway to grow and capture additional share over time.
Our ability to win in the market starts with the value we create for both our customers and our suppliers, which we've highlighted on Slide 6. It begins with our people-first culture, which empowers our associates to operate with an entrepreneurial mindset and build strong relationships in their local markets. For our customers, we provide a broad portfolio of highly specified products, deep technical expertise and a consultative sales approach that helps them navigate complex infrastructure projects.
Our local teams understand the specifications, regulations and project requirements unique to each municipality and job site, allowing us to support customers through early project planning through delivery and installation. At the same time, we differentiate ourselves through our delivery capabilities and proprietary technology tools, which help simplify estimating, procurement and job site logistics. Combined with our national distribution network, this enables us to deliver materials reliably and efficiently, helping customers keep projects on schedule and within budget.
For our suppliers, Core & Main serves as a critical channel to reach a highly fragmented customer base. Our expanded sales force and geographic footprint provide access to tens of thousands of contractors, municipalities and utilities across the country. We also help drive the adoption of new products and technologies by leveraging our local relationships, technical expertise and market insights. Underlying all this is our operating model, which combines local expertise with national capabilities and resources. Our local teams lead customer relationships and project execution, while our scale provides advantages in sourcing, distribution, technology and product availability. This combination allows us to deliver a high level of service to customers while also creating meaningful value for our supplier partners.
Together, these capabilities form a differentiated value proposition that positions Core & Main to consistently gain market share and deliver strong, reliable execution.
Turning to our recent accomplishments on Page 7. Fiscal 2025 was a year of disciplined execution for Core & Main. We delivered our 16th consecutive year of sales growth, a result that reflects the resilience of our business, the long-term strength of our end markets and the consistent performance by our teams across the country. We generated net sales of $7.65 billion, adjusted EBITDA of $931 million, adjusted diluted EPS of $2.97 and operating cash flow of $650 million.
As we talk through the year, I want to frame our performance against the annual value creation targets we use to measure the business, which include end market growth, organic above-market growth, acquisitions, margin expansion and cash flow.
First is our end market growth. Our annual target assumes 2% to 4% market volume growth. And in fiscal 2025, our end markets were roughly flat overall. Municipal volumes were up low to mid-single digits and continue to be a source of strength supported by steady repair and replacement activity and a healthy funding environment. While municipal demand remained resilient, it was not enough to fully offset softness in other areas of our end markets.
Nonresidential volumes were relatively muted throughout the year. Growth from data centers, street and highway projects and multifamily developments provided support, but that strength was offset by softness in more traditional commercial lot development activity. Residential lot development declined low double digits as housing affordability and higher mortgage rates continue to weigh on demand. We expect residential will eventually return to growth to satisfy the significant undersupply of housing in the U.S. While end market trends are outside of our control, we have been proactive in repositioning the business to perform in this environment by strengthening our municipal business while remaining fully committed to the private construction markets. We've had a couple of years of softer-than-normal end markets. And despite near-term softness, we expect growth to resume in the medium term.
Second is our organic above-market growth. Our annual target calls for 2% to 4%. And in fiscal 2025, we delivered squarely within that range. A big driver of that performance was our sales initiatives, which delivered robust results as we broadened our portfolio of solutions to address aging water infrastructure. Collectively, average daily net sales grew double digits in fusible HDPE, treatment plant solutions and geosynthetics. Average daily net sales for meter products grew 12% in the quarter and grew mid-single digits for the year on top of a strong prior year growth comparison of 32%.
We also expanded our footprint during and subsequent to the year to make our products more accessible nationwide, opening 10 new branches in attractive markets. We have a pipeline of additional greenfield locations and expect to open additional locations as we progress throughout the year. Collectively, these sales and geographic expansion initiatives drove 3 points of organic above-market growth in fiscal 2025, reflecting continued share gains across our markets. We are confident in our ability to continue driving above-market growth through these sales, geographic and key talent initiatives in fiscal 2026 and beyond.
Third is our growth from acquisitions. Our annual target is 2% to 4% growth from acquisitions, and in fiscal 2025, we delivered 2%. That includes contributions from acquisitions completed in fiscal 2024, along with 2 complementary acquisitions we completed in fiscal 2025, Canada Waterworks and Pioneer Supply. Together, these acquisitions added 5 branches to our footprint during the year.
Canada Waterworks builds on the platform we established in Canada last year with the HM Pipe acquisition. With these additions, we now operate 7 branches in Ontario, including 2 greenfields opened earlier this year as we continue expanding our presence. Pioneer Supply expands our presence in Texas and Oklahoma, further extending our reach in attractive growth markets. Both businesses bring a strong reputation for quality and service that align with Core & Main's mission. Together, we're extending our reach and creating even greater opportunities for growth and value creation.
More broadly, acquisitions and greenfields are complementary tools we use to expand our footprint and unlock new growth opportunities. In some markets, we establish a presence through greenfields, while in others like Canada, acquisitions provide an initial platform that we can then expand through additional investments over time. We are well positioned to continue driving growth through M&A.
Fourth is margin expansion. In fiscal 2025, we delivered strong gross margin performance, expanding 30 basis points year-over-year, driven by higher private label penetration and disciplined purchasing and pricing execution. Our gross margin performance for the year reflects great execution by our local teams in challenging market conditions, coupled with the benefits of our national scale and initiatives. Flat end market volumes and flat pricing, coupled with higher-than-normal inflation on our operating costs, limited our ability to achieve SG&A leverage this year. Historically, we've offset these impacts with productivity and price increases and expect we will do that going forward.
Our last value creation lever is cash generation. Every year, we target converting 60% to 70% of adjusted EBITDA into operating cash flow. We delivered $650 million of operating cash flow in fiscal 2025, which represents conversion at the high end of the range. Strong cash generation continues to be a differentiator for Core & Main, and it gives us flexibility to invest in the business, pursue strategic M&A and return capital to shareholders.
As we look ahead, our focus is straightforward: extend the advantages we've built, compound market share gains and continue expanding the structural earnings power of the business.
Beginning on Page 8, we'll cover the fundamentals of our end markets and why they remain attractive over the long term. Brad will then walk through why we have confidence in our ability to grow and improve profitability.
We benefit from a large base of aging municipal water infrastructure that drives consistent repair and replacement activity, and that backdrop is complemented by strong local funding and incremental federal and state funding that expands the addressable opportunity. We also continue to see an increasing need for modernization projects, including treatment plant upgrades and metering conversions, which reinforce the multiyear nature of municipal demand.
Our nonresidential end market is supported by a balanced mix between new development and repair and replacement activity, ranging from commercial and industrial construction to less cyclical infrastructure projects like road and bridge rehabilitation activity. As I mentioned earlier, we're seeing mixed demand across project types in the near term, but the long-term themes like onshoring and broader infrastructure investment are expected to support a steady pipeline of work as large projects move from planning to execution.
Lastly is residential. While near-term housing activity can move with interest rates and affordability, the long-term demand drivers are structural. The U.S. has built fewer homes than household formations over the past 2 decades, which has created an undersupply and a long runway for future lot development. Importantly, residential growth can also provide incremental support to our other 2 end markets as communities expand into suburban and rural areas, commercial development follows. And all of that residential and nonresidential growth places a greater strain on local water systems, which drives municipal expansion, upgrades and repairs. We believe the release of pent-up residential activity supports residential, nonresidential and municipal growth.
Next, I would like to welcome Brad Cowles, our President, who will walk through the investments we are making in our products, capabilities, footprint and people and how those initiatives are driving market share gains and supporting margin expansion. Go ahead, Brad.
Thanks, Mark, and good morning, everyone. It's great to be here with you today. Turning to Page 9. I want to share some insights on the sales initiatives and capabilities that are driving consistent above-market growth and market share gains. Building on the foundation of our core business and extensive branch presence, we're bringing additional value to our customers in 2 primary ways with a broader product offering to cover all of their project needs and by bringing complete solutions to their more complex challenges.
Our key initiatives, meters, treatment plant, fusible HDPE and geosynthetics have combined to grow at an average annual rate of approximately 14% over the past 5 years, significantly outpacing underlying market demand. Two of these initiatives are focused on expanding our product offering, fusible HDPE and geosynthetics. These product initiatives require new supplier partnerships, specialized equipment and technicians as well as unique storage and logistics solutions. As we expand these capabilities across our branch network, we can bring these products to our current customers and also pursue new customers who specialize in the installation of these unique products.
Fusible HDPE, for example, is used in water and sewer systems by our current municipal and contractor customers, but the same products, fusion equipment and technicians are also used in agriculture, energy, mining, landfill and other applications, often in the very same geography. Smart meters and treatment plant are sales initiatives focused on solving more complex problems and offering more comprehensive solutions to our customers. We do this by investing in national teams with very specific expertise who complement the efforts of our local branches. We help our customers understand the possible solutions. And in doing so, we often create additional demand.
Smart metering is a great example of how our turnkey solutions are winning with the customers while bringing them solutions they had never imagined. We were recently awarded what we believe is the largest metering contract in U.S. history, reflecting our leading position in the market. We deliver solutions that help utilities improve billing accuracy, reduce water loss and enhance system visibility. These solutions combine metering and other sensor hardware, software, installation, project management and everyday maintenance for metering projects of any size. We are enjoying a high rate of success on large complex projects, and we take that as a sign that we're taking a larger share of the market as municipal customers look for a single partner to deliver end-to-end solutions. As a result, our smart metering business has grown at an average annual rate of approximately 14% over the last 5 years.
Our National Critical Infrastructure Group specializes in complex water treatment and delivery projects consisting of pipes, valves, fittings and fabricated assemblies. Large capital investments are being made in treatment plants and water transmission lines across the country as demand increases from onshoring, data center construction and population shifts, and we are seeing above-market growth across these project types. That momentum, coupled with our differentiated product and service offering has helped drive this initiative to grow at an average annual rate of nearly 25% over the past 5 years. We also see opportunities to continue expanding our capabilities and product lines within water treatment, both organically and inorganically.
As the projects get larger, the customer partnerships become more important and the demands for timely and high-quality execution gets stronger. Our focus on strategic customer accounts positions us to win business as these leading general contractors move across the country, performing work on the most significant capital projects.
Geographic expansion is another important lever in our above-market sales growth. Our market mapping process helps us identify underpenetrated areas with attractive growth characteristics where our brand, product breadth and service model can differentiate us. Greenfields yield strong returns and provide a complementary path when acquisition targets are not available to us in a market we wish to enter. We completed 6 greenfield openings in fiscal 2025, and we expect to open a record 7 to 10 locations in the coming year.
Even in markets where we already operate, we often have the opportunity to add and develop sales talent to strengthen our sales coverage. That includes building the right mix of outside sales, inside sales and product expertise so we can support larger and more complex projects, increase share of wallet with existing customers and capture more opportunities in the markets we already serve.
With that as context, Page 10 highlights how disciplined M&A complements these organic growth levers. Our highly fragmented market creates a long runway for disciplined acquisitions. Over time, we've built a reputation as the acquirer of choice in our industry, grounded by our entrepreneurial culture and the resources we bring to help acquired businesses grow. Since 2017, we have completed more than 40 acquisitions, adding nearly 150 branches and over $1.8 billion of annual sales. Our pipeline is deep and actionable. We evaluate on average more than 50 opportunities each year with roughly a dozen opportunities in active evaluation at any time.
When companies join Core & Main, they gain broader product breadth, industry-specific technology and national capabilities and resources that help them serve customers more effectively. They also gain shared administrative support, which reduces the burden on local teams and allows them to spend more time with customers. And we invest in people through best-in-class training and career development opportunities that help retain and grow talent.
As we evaluate opportunities, we prioritize businesses that expand our presence in new or underrepresented markets, help us add products and service capabilities and bring in key industry talent. Looking ahead, we see a clear path for M&A to contribute 2 to 4 points of annual sales growth over time.
Turning to Page 11. One of the things we are most excited about is the runway we have to expand margins, and this slide summarizes the levers that support that opportunity. Private label is a powerful driver of gross margin expansion. It includes direct sourcing of comparable products and also building differentiated brands. We've developed a meaningful private label capability that is supported by an internal master distribution network, and our private label brands are respected because we invest in quality and enhanced features while ensuring we meet required specifications. We also stay close to the field by soliciting feedback on quality, pricing and packaging and by prioritizing service levels and availability as we service our own branches.
We've been investing in the infrastructure to scale private label adoption. Since the end of last year, we've added distribution capacity and expanded the assortment by more than 6,000 SKUs. Private label represented about 5% of sales in fiscal 2025, and we see a clear path to at least 10% over time.
Sourcing and pricing optimization are another structural advantage. Our scale and buying expertise help us secure access to the most preferred products with favorable terms and improved net product costs. We foster strong partnerships with key suppliers to drive shared growth. At the same time, we leverage centralized resources and transaction data to help guide optimal price points while empowering our local teams with final pricing authority. Together, these capabilities allow us to capture the full value of our purchasing scale while maintaining the local responsiveness that our customers expect.
Technology and innovation tie all these levers together, creating a meaningful opportunity to drive sales, margins and efficiency. We are broadening our agenda to ensure that Core & Main remains the industry's technology leader with continuous investment in step-change productivity and a better customer experience with AI-enabled solutions that reduce administrative burden and free our teams to focus on customers. We believe this creates a durable long-term advantage and supports Core & Main's differentiated value proposition.
To wrap up, these product and solution initiatives are reinforcing each other and strengthening our ability to gain share, expand margins and scale the business with discipline. They help us accelerate greenfield contributions, and they maximize the synergies we can get from acquisitions. We are investing where we see the greatest opportunity, and we are confident in the path ahead.
With that, I will turn it over to Robyn to walk through our fourth quarter and full year financial results. Go ahead, Robyn.
Thanks, Brad. Good morning, everyone. I'll start on Page 13 with some highlights from our fourth quarter results.
Net sales in the fourth quarter decreased 7% to $1.58 billion. As a reminder, we had 1 fewer selling week in the fourth quarter of this year compared to last year. On an average daily net sales basis, sales increased about 1%, driven by roughly 1 point of organic volumes. Pricing remained positive across nearly every product category with the exception of PVC pipe, resulting in roughly flat pricing overall. Sales in the final week of the quarter were also affected by severe winter weather that temporarily limited construction activity in several regions.
Gross margin in the fourth quarter was 27.1%, an increase of 50 basis points year-over-year. The improvement reflects higher private label penetration and disciplined purchasing and pricing execution. Total SG&A for the quarter decreased 5% to $264 million. The year-over-year decline was driven primarily by lower variable costs from 1 less selling week, along with benefits from our previously announced cost actions. Sequentially, SG&A was $31 million lower than the third quarter, reflecting approximately $5 million of realized savings with the remainder due to reductions in variable costs.
Over the course of fiscal 2025, we implemented approximately $30 million of annualized cost actions with roughly $6 million recognized this year and the remainder expected to flow through our results during fiscal 2026. Our approach continues to be measured. We are improving our cost structure without compromising customer service or long-term growth. At the same time, we continue to invest in targeted roles to support product line and geographic expansion. We are highly focused on regaining operating leverage by offsetting SG&A investments with productivity gains while maintaining the service levels and capabilities that support our growth strategy. Adjusted EBITDA in the fourth quarter was $167 million, down 7% versus last year, primarily reflecting 1 fewer selling week. Adjusted EBITDA margin was 10 basis points higher than last year at 10.6%.
Turning to our full year performance on Page 14. For fiscal 2025, net sales grew approximately 3% to $7.65 billion. Sales growth was 5% when adjusted for 1 less selling week. We delivered roughly 3 points of organic market share gains, while our end markets were roughly flat overall with municipal up low to mid-single digits, nonresidential relatively flat and residential down low double digits. Our market outperformance was driven by our sales and geographic expansion initiatives, including metering, treatment plant, fusible HDPE and geosynthetics and investments to expand our coverage in priority markets. We also achieved 2 points of sales growth from acquisitions and prices were overall flat.
Gross margin for the year was 26.9%, up 30 basis points from fiscal 2024, reflecting higher private label penetration and disciplined purchasing and pricing execution. Private label increased 100 basis points in fiscal 2025 to roughly 5% of sales. That mix shift was a meaningful driver of the year-over-year improvement. Total SG&A for the year increased 7% to $1.15 billion. The increase in SG&A was driven by inflation, acquisitions, volume-related growth and strategic investments to support sales growth, margin expansion and future productivity.
While these factors pressured SG&A leverage in the near term, we remain focused on driving both growth and profitability and are confident the actions we have taken position us to return to EBITDA margin expansion over time. Adjusted EBITDA was $931 million, slightly ahead of the prior year, while adjusted EBITDA margin declined 30 basis points to 12.2%. The year-over-year margin decline reflects higher SG&A as a percentage of net sales, partially offset by 30 basis points of gross margin expansion. Adjusted diluted EPS increased 7% to $2.97. Growth was driven by higher adjusted net income from lower interest expense and the benefit of a lower share count from share repurchases. We exclude intangible amortization from adjusted diluted EPS because a significant portion relates to the formation of Core & Main following our 2017 leverage buyout.
Turning to the balance sheet, cash flow and capital allocation. We ended the year with net debt of nearly $1.95 billion and net debt leverage of 2.1x, well within our target range of 1.5 to 3x. Liquidity was $1.45 billion, including $220 million of cash with the remainder available under our ABL facility. We generated $650 million of operating cash flow during the year, reflecting approximately 70% conversion from adjusted EBITDA. Our free cash flow yield was 5.8%, a level that is nearly 3x higher than our specialty distribution peers. We returned $155 million to shareholders through share repurchases during the year, reducing our share count by roughly 3.2 million. And subsequent to the fiscal year, we deployed an additional $39 million to repurchase 800,000 shares. Since our 2021 IPO, we have repurchased over 20% of our original shares outstanding, reflecting our commitment to return capital while continuing to invest in growth.
Next, I will cover our outlook on Page 16. For fiscal 2026, we expect net sales of $7.8 billion to $7.9 billion, adjusted EBITDA of $950 million to $980 million and operating cash flow conversion of 60% to 70% of adjusted EBITDA. We are confident in the strength of the municipal market due to the stability of funding sources and the nondiscretionary nature of demand. We remain cautious on the private construction market given the heightened geopolitical volatility, including the developing Middle East conflict and ongoing tariff uncertainties, along with continued uncertainty around the interest rate environment and overall builder confidence.
Despite this, we still expect our overall end markets to be roughly flat for the year. We do expect to drive above-market volume growth from our sales and geographic expansion initiatives. Drivers include continued strong performance across meters and treatment plant and opening a record 7 to 10 greenfields in attractive markets. Despite softer end market conditions and a neutral pricing environment, we expect to grow adjusted EBITDA margins as we continue to execute our gross margin initiatives and realize the benefits of our previously announced cost actions.
We expect another year of strong operating cash flow, and our capital allocation priorities are unchanged. We will continue investing in the growth of the business, both organically and through strategic M&A while returning capital to shareholders through share repurchases. We remain confident in the strength of our business and our ability to execute. We have delivered consistent results through varying market environments, maintained disciplined pricing, expanded gross margins, generated strong cash flow that enabled us to reinvest in the business and return capital to shareholders and have continued to gain share across our markets.
Our operating model is resilient, and our strategic priorities are clear. In the near term, our municipal end market provides stability. Over the medium term, we expect momentum to return in the residential and nonresidential markets, along with a return to a more typical pricing environment. As these dynamics improve, the structural earnings power we've built positions Core & Main to unlock meaningful long-term profitable growth and value creation. In the meantime, we will continue to drive volume through strong execution and above-market growth.
With that, let's open up the call for questions.
[Operator Instructions] Our first question for today comes from David Manthey of Baird.
2. Question Answer
My first question is the one that I get from investors most frequently, which is the growth disconnect of Core & Main versus the corresponding segment at your largest competitors. And I know we've talked about this offline. I just was hoping you could maybe just address some of the differences in vertical end market influence and geographic and product mix and why you think there's a slight disconnect between your growth and your biggest competitor?
Yes. Thanks, Dave. Appreciate the question. Dave, I would tell you from an end market perspective, we feel really good about our presence and reach certainly across the municipal end market, nonresidential and the residential end markets. We clearly are, I would say, in every market that our other national competitor is in. We've got -- obviously, we both compete against a large volume of local distributors and regional competitors. So I think both us and our other national distributors are doing a really good job of taking share across the industry with certainly us driving a lot of good share growth with our smart meter business.
Treatment plant is an area, I would say, that we've grown pretty significantly. I would say that's an area that they've been, I would say, a little ahead of us over the years, but we're rapidly, I would say, gaining ground in that area. And then I think certainly, as part of the data center construction that we've seen pop up, I would say they've been in a little better position in some of those markets, particularly the ones that are kind of in their backyard in kind of Northern Virginia area and Texas, in particular, are areas that we're investing in, I'd say, rapidly to kind of catch that.
But what I would tell you is that what I like in terms of our position there is we're seeing more and more of these data centers pop up across the U.S. And given our geographic reach and our strong relationships we have in these local markets, we've seen a lot of good gains here over the last couple of years on those data centers as we've seen those expand much more broadly across the U.S. And I think our exposure there is going to continue to be helpful as we pick up that business.
So we view it as a positive. I think our large national competitors having good results. We're seeing good share gains and good results on our side and feel that that's a good thing overall for the industry.
I appreciate that color. The second question is on costs. So as we think about the cost-out program and the $30 million run rate, I think you said $5 million of the benefit hit in the fourth quarter that would imply that, I guess, we don't lap that fully until we get to the first half of 2027. Can you just correct me on that if I'm wrong, that you'll continue to see year-on-year benefits from that cost-out program diminishing through the year, but still positive through 2026. Is that correct?
Yes. Thanks, Dave. That's what we're expecting. We saw -- we completed all of the $30 million of cost out during FY '25. We got about $1 million of that benefit in the third quarter. We got $5 million of that benefit in the fourth quarter. So that remainder of that $30 million, we'll see all of that really hit in the first, second and third quarter of next year before we annualize those cost-out efforts.
Got it. So if you're at $5 million in the fourth quarter, that implies a $20 million run rate. So there should still be positive, I should say, lower costs in the beginning of '27 as well.
Perfect. Yes.
Our next question comes from Matthew Bouley of Barclays.
So maybe just to address kind of the current market conditions around energy and commodity inflation following the Middle East conflict here. So maybe just kind of near-term diesel surcharges, et cetera, how are you expecting to deal with that? How should we think about modeling all that? And then over these past few weeks, kind of what are you hearing from suppliers around price increases? And how does that play into your guide for flat pricing for the year?
Yes. Thanks, Matt. I'll go ahead and take that one. I would tell you, we're obviously watching things very closely as they develop in the Middle East. We definitely have a direct impact as we see some of the increases in fuel with our delivery operating expenses and that sort of thing, but it's still relatively small, and we've got a lot of that embedded in the guide that we laid out. I would say more indirectly, we're watching closely the effects on the oil and gas market. We have seen that start to, I would say, impact the global resin prices that are out there. So there is some indications that we're going to start seeing some increases coming through on certain product categories related to that. And frankly, just all the -- if fuel and those prices continue to increase, I think we'll see some of that increase flow through some other product categories more broadly.
But specifically, as those resin prices increase globally, we're starting to hear signs that we'll start seeing some increases related to products like PVC, HDPE pipe could definitely be impacted by that and definitely things that we're starting to hear about right now. So those are things that we'll watch closely as this continues to develop, but I view those as kind of positive signs for us as we look to see some stability with pricing in some of those product lines.
So overall, I'd say we kind of view it as neutral to positive if this kind of disruption continues in the market from that standpoint. But obviously, any kind of uncertainty, the rising fuel prices within the global economy, we're definitely concerned that, that could create a little bit of uncertainty in the macro, just demand environment, which is part of why I think you saw the nature of the guidance that we put out there was just given a lot of that overall uncertainty that we could experience.
Got it. Okay. No, that's great color. And then secondly, kind of stepping back around some of the growth investments. I heard you saying you're focusing investments in areas like data center, maybe treatment plants as well, if I heard you correctly, sort of looking to close that gap versus your competition. I guess, number one, just any way to kind of quantify the investments you're putting in there? Just obviously, we're trying to dial in the SG&A outlook. But again, kind of stepping back, what are some of the specifics you're looking to do here, whether it's from -- in terms of your sales force, et cetera? What kind of needs to be done? And what would the kind of resulting impact be on, again, these large projects out there?
Yes, Matt, this is Brad Cowles. I'll take that. The initiatives that I highlighted kind of the biggest movers for us with the most attractive kind of growth dynamics, I'd put smart utility in there, but also the treatment plant. And the resources that we invest in to do treatment plant work adapt very well to all of the -- what I would just generally call higher capacity, more complex water delivery projects, which are on data centers or large plants, water transmission lines and actual water treatment plants themselves. And that structure that we put in place, one of those national complementary team structures that we use to kind of enhance the capabilities of the local branch, we're going to be investing upwards of another 30 people in that initiative this year, just to give you a sense of the scale.
And those are resources that are kind of positioned both regionally and nationally to -- they're a little bit more mobile and cover a little bit more geography than a branch, which is serving generally kind of a fairly tight radius. And so they go where the work is. They follow these strategic national accounts, and they bring that level of expertise that really builds confidence and trust in us and accelerates the ability to win on those bigger projects.
Our next question comes from Joe Ritchie of Goldman Sachs.
So first question maybe for Mark. So you take a look at the guidance of kind of $950 million to $980 million EBITDA guidance for the year implies 2% to 5% EBITDA growth. I guess, how are you thinking about the kind of range of options here between the low end and the high end? And if we can maybe dig in a little bit on some of the main components, whether it's SG&A, gross margins, the investments that you're making, that would be helpful.
Joe, it's Robyn. I'll take that one. Thinking about the guide and what we laid out here, obviously, it's an unusual time with a lot of uncertainty with what's going on in the macro environment. So we felt like we needed to be prudent with what's going on externally. So with the guide, we've got the market kind of flattish. We'll always deliver on that above-market growth. And we do have a little bit of M&A in there that we completed last year. Our -- what we've got embedded in the guide is expecting pricing to be about flattish for the year might look similar to what we saw in FY '25.
Now obviously, with what Mark just mentioned on the price of resin increasing, we could see a little bit of lift there, and that's an opportunity for us. So if you think about the guide and what we've laid out and the opportunities that we have to perform on the high end of that or even outside of that, it's things like if we get a little bit of price that's going to be incredibly helpful for us on the top line, that will help us get more SG&A leverage. We're expecting the residential market to continue to be at the levels that it's been performing lately. So that will be a headwind in the first half of the year for us given where that activity is sitting today.
But if some of the uncertainty settles out and we do see a little bit improvement in the markets, then that could obviously help us as well. Any extra lift we get on the sales side will help us hit those SG&A targets and help us get better leverage there. We have a lot of confidence in gross margin. Our private label initiative has been performing really well. We expect that to continue and expect to continue to deliver on gross margin initiatives.
And then I think you asked also on the low end of the guide. Obviously, if there's higher inflation than what we're expecting, we did see a lot of inflation in FY '25. That was in the mid-single digits range. We typically expect to see that in the low single digit range, which is what we're expecting. But if any of that inflation comes in higher or if any of the markets are a little bit weaker, that would bring us in at the lower end of that guide.
Super helpful, Robyn. And then maybe my follow-on question either for Brad or for Mark. Just on the M&A discussion. So you guys have had just an incredible track record of compounding the M&A over the last several years, you can go back to the HD Supply days. But like the -- when I look at this year, this year was a little bit lighter or the most completed year was a little bit lighter. How are you guys thinking about getting back to maybe that cadence of maybe 2 to 4 points a year? And then also, is that opportunity likely to occur this year? Like just help us walk us through kind of the 2027 expectations for M&A and your ability to maybe kind of get back to what the more normalized cadence was for the company?
Yes. Thanks, Joe. I'll take that. In terms of the M&A, I would tell you, I'm extremely confident in our capabilities there and the pipeline that we have. Even though 2025 for us was a lighter year, we still delivered on the low end of the M&A growth target that we put out from 2% to 4%. And there just has not been a lot trading in our industry, and we are incredibly well positioned with the relationships that we have with the opportunities that are out there. It tends to be choppy. We've had some lighter years in our recent history as well. So -- and we've had some years where it's come well beyond that range. So I do expect that it will be choppier. I do think we've got a really good pipeline of opportunities right now that we're looking at. So expect 2026 will be a year for us where we're kind of right in that range with plenty of opportunities that we're keeping a close eye on that could extend us beyond that.
So I feel really good about the M&A that we've got. And then as you've seen in a lighter year, we're also opening up a record number of greenfields as well. So we've got both levers. We're well positioned to capture that share one way or the other and feel confident in our team's ability to go do that.
Our next question comes from Matt Johnson of UBS.
I guess, first off, if we could just talk about the meters business a little bit. I think you guys have sounded pretty excited about this business for some time now. So I guess, can you guys just give a little more detail on what level of growth you're expecting for this segment in 2026? And also how much of a contribution you guys are expecting from the contracts that you guys talked about this past quarter? And just any kind of more color you could give on the magnitude and the timing of that contract would be great.
Yes. Thanks, Matt. This is Brad. I'll take that. This initiative is -- it's been an exciting area for us. We've just consistently delivered at least low double-digit growth year after year. We continue to invest, and I think we keep getting better. Those large projects that we win can represent in a given year between maybe 1/3 or a little more than 1/3 of kind of our volume. Keep in mind, we have a massive underlying base of municipal sales that drive kind of your more everyday repair and replace and upgrade meter projects. But those large ones have been quite interesting and more substantial as we've become kind of the preferred prime contractor, if you will, for that scale and complexity of project.
In 2025, we had another incredible year. We were comping, I think, 32% growth from the prior year. So it was a bit of a stretch. But I think we're back on our stride. You heard Mark say we pushed a 12% growth in the quarter on the meter initiative. And I'd say early innings in 2026, we feel like we're back on stride even having swallowed that pretty large step change in '24 to 2025. So I'm pretty excited about it. We're investing additional resources there, much like we are in treatment plan to keep our coverage strong. We've got a good pipeline of additional large projects and expect to have that same kind of balance going forward in '26, where we still have a massive base of underlying municipal meter sales and then a nice third to slightly higher coming from those big projects.
That's great. Appreciate that. And then also if we could just ask to get a little more detail on what you guys are expecting for the resi end market this year. I think Robyn said expecting down in the first half before leveling off in the second half. So I guess any kind of color you can give on what level of declines you guys exited the year at? And then how you're kind of expecting that to shape up through the year would be great.
Yes. I would tell you, as we exited 2025, we felt that it was sequentially pretty stable but at low levels. And so we kind of work our way here into early 2026, we're definitely in a different position than we were last year at this time. You go back to the early part of 2025, and there was some optimism out there in the builder and development world. There were projects that were -- that we saw a lot of good bidding activity on, and we saw some good volume in the early part of 2025, which then definitely tapered off as we got into the second quarter and then into the back half.
So I'd say sequentially, it's been stable, but we're definitely in a different position than we were last year at this time, which is kind of what's leading us to believe resi will be relatively soft year-over-year to start the year and should ease in terms of the comparisons as we get into the second half of 2026.
Our next question comes from Mike Dahl of RBC.
Can we just stick with the end market conversation? And Mark, let's just put a finer point on things. So resi was down low double digits for the year in '25 and clearly worse in the second half. Are we -- is this commentary to suggest that given the tough comps, resi is likely down something like mid-teens or worse in the first half of the year and still winds up down high single digits, 10%? I think people are just trying to bridge to the -- like more specifically, yes, the resi, but then also if we step back within the flat blended end markets, the quantitative build of what is resi, what is non-resi, what is muni. So if you could help dial that in. And maybe also just as part of that, quarter-to-date trends, if you could enlighten us a little on how that's shaped up, obviously, a lot of weather dynamics, et cetera.
Yes. Mike, I'll take that. So starting with resi, the way that we're thinking about that is that we had a decent residential end market in the first quarter of last year. As -- like Mark mentioned, there was some optimism for the second half of the year and the homebuilders are still developing some lots during that time. So we saw some good activity in the first quarter. So we're going to be anniversarying that tougher comp in the first quarter. So expecting the first part of the year to be down in the low double digits to mid-teens range for residential and then sequentially improving throughout the year. So the second quarter could look something like down high single digits and then maybe it's flattish in the back half of the year.
Really not expecting at this point that residential gets much better. There's nothing pointing to that yet. Obviously, there's some optimism there and there's some pent-up demand at some point, but the timing of that is uncertain. So a tougher comp in the first half of the year for resi and then that starts to improve and maybe we get to about flattish by the end of the year because those comps get easier.
On the nonresidential side -- sorry, on residential, so we're expecting that all works out to be about -- down about mid-single digits for resi for FY '26. And then on the nonresidential side, we're expecting it to perform somewhat similar to FY '25, which is in the flattish range. There's a lot of project types within our nonresidential and there's some of those project types that are performing well, some of the data centers, some of the street and highway projects, multifamily and then there's a lot of that lighter commercial type of work that's been softer this year, retail, office space, some of those areas -- and we're not expecting a lot of change in what we've seen there. So expecting the nonresidential market to be flattish.
And then on the municipal side, this is an area that's very steady, stable, strong for us, had a really good year in FY '25, expecting that to continue to perform well. In the guide, we've got embedded low single-digits growth there on the municipal side. But this is an area that's got ample funding at the state level, the federal level, at the local level. We feel like this is a really key and important market for us that we think is going to be strong and stable over the short, medium and long term.
That's helpful and makes a lot of sense. On the -- just as a follow-up, -- just in light of the recent uncertainty and some of the early signals that you're seeing where certain categories could have to potentially take price. How are you thinking about inventory management? Because a lot of these categories probably have some slack where if you wanted to lean in, maybe you could buy ahead of some of this. But just curious to get your thoughts on how you're thinking about that.
Yes. I would tell you, that's something that we do really well here at Core & Main is managing kind of the ins and outs of those inventory investments, especially when there's some indications of price volatility. That's always been, I'd say, a really good driver of gross margin expansion for us and that ability to identify where and when we see those price increases and where and when to make those investments from an inventory standpoint. I think our teams do an extraordinary job of getting a lot of that product ahead of those increases and then working to get that into the market at the appropriate time. So I'd say that's been a standard part of our execution playbook and something that we generally do pretty well.
Our next question comes from Nigel Coe with Wolfe Research.
But just wondering if maybe you could comment on what you're seeing through the first quarter. Just given the comments from Robyn on the residential market, it looks like we might be below that 2% to 3% in the first quarter. Just want to make sure that's the case. And then when it comes to the end market outlook, I think it's obviously keeping a conservative stance here makes a lot of sense given the backdrop. I think a lot of investors are surprised that pricing is flat given the acceleration we've seen in inflation before this Iran shock. So just wondering, is it simply the PVC headwinds here? Or are there any other competitive kind of impediments to getting price here?
Yes, Nigel, I'll touch on what we're seeing so far in the first quarter and then hit on the pricing part. In the first quarter, we've got a January 31 year-end. So we've been through February and not quite all the way through March yet. But I would say what we're seeing is pretty well in line with our guide. We are expecting the first quarter to be our toughest comp quarter. So we are expecting sales and EBITDA might be down a little bit slightly year-over-year and then improving as we go each quarter. And that's in line with what we were expecting. We did see about a $15 million to $20 million weather impact the last week of our fiscal year when there was a deep freeze and a lot of winter severe weather. We're getting a lot of that back in the first quarter. So we think all of that will just come back in the first quarter. Gross margins are performing strong. SG&A, we're seeing some of the cost-out impact favorability there.
So feeling good about the first quarter, obviously, on soft markets and probably be down slightly year-over-year on the quarter, but it's coming in really in line with guide and expect it to improve as we get throughout the year.
And then on the pricing side, all of our product categories were basically up in FY '25, except for PVC. PVC was down about 15% in the year. So there's a variety of different outcomes that we could see in FY '26, but we're not counting on a full recovery of PVC. Some of the oil increased prices could help either stabilize that or increase it. But what we're seeing today is PVC will have a -- as it's gone down all throughout the year, we're going to have a headwind at least in the first half to 3 quarters of the year on PVC, even if it stabilizes where it's at today. So that would be the puts and takes. We would expect price increases in all of our other product categories.
That's really helpful. And then just a quick one on buybacks. I think from the K, it looks like you bought back about [ 7,000 ] shares in February, March. That's a decent chunk of shares compared to what you did in 2025. Just wondering if there's any intention to keep stepping on buybacks at these current share prices.
Yes. Yes. Nigel, we did about $155 million last year, almost $40 million in the first quarter. Given where the stock price is at, we've got ample cash flow. We've got tons of cash to be able to reinvest in the business, M&A and do buybacks. So you can expect us to see continued buybacks. We've got about over $600 million still remaining on our authorization. So that will be a big part of our capital allocation going forward.
I'll now hand it back to Mark Witkowski for any further remarks.
All right. Thanks for joining us today. As we wrap up, I want to leave you with a few key points. Fiscal 2025 was another year of disciplined execution. We delivered our 16th consecutive year of sales growth, drove 3 points of above-market growth through share gains and structurally expanded gross margins, all while generating strong cash flow. At the same time, we continue to invest in the product categories, footprint and capabilities that position us to compound these gains over time.
Looking ahead, we see a clear path to growth and improved operating leverage. Our initiatives are working, our actions to address cost pressures are in place, and our end markets remain attractive over the long term. Over the last 12 months, I've spent meaningful time with customers, suppliers and associates across the country. Those conversations reinforce what differentiates this company, our people, our culture and our consistent focus on execution. I'm grateful for our teams and confident in the opportunity in front of us. Thank you for your continued interest in Core & Main.
Operator, that concludes our call.
Thank you all for joining today's call. You may now disconnect your lines.
Core & Main — Q4 2026 Earnings Call
Core & Main — Q3 2026 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Hello, and welcome to the Core & Main Q3 2025 Earnings Call. My name is Alex. I'll be coordinating today's call. [Operator Instructions]
I'll now hand it over to Glenn Floyd, Director of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Good morning, and thank you for joining us. I'm Glenn Floyd, Director of Investor Relations at Core & Main. We appreciate you taking the time to be with us today for Core & Main's fiscal 2025 Third Quarter Earnings Call. Joining me this morning are Mark Witkowski, our Chief Executive Officer; and Robyn Bradbury, our Chief Financial Officer. .
Mark will begin today's call by sharing an update on our business and recent performance. Robyn will follow with a review of our third quarter results and our outlook for the year. We'll then open the line for Q&A, and Mark will wrap up with closing remarks.
As a reminder, our press release, presentation materials and the statements made during today's call may include forward-looking statements. These are subject to various risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations.
For more information, please refer to the cautionary statements included in our earnings press release and in our filings with the SEC. We will also reference certain non-GAAP financial measures during today's discussion. We believe these metrics provide useful insight into the underlying performance of our business.
Reconciliations to the most comparable GAAP measures are available in both our press release and in the appendix of today's investor presentation. Thank you again for your interest in Core & Main. I'll now turn the call over to our Chief Executive Officer, Mark Witkowski.
Thanks, Glenn, and good morning, everyone. Before we dive into our results, I want to start by reminding everyone of Core & Main's value proposition. Core & Main is a leading specialty distributor of water infrastructure products and services in North America supporting the repair, upgrade and expansion of our nation's critical water systems.
Our competitive advantages, including national scale and resources, local market expertise backed by the best trained sales force industry-specific technology and comprehensive product solutions position us to lead an attractive secular growth market, driven by aging infrastructure, increasing water demand and ongoing investment needs.
Our business model is built for resilience. Today, municipal projects represent over 40% of our sales providing steady, predictable demand, supported by reliable funding sources. Our nonresidential end market, which represents roughly 40% of sales benefits from a diverse project mix across commercial, industrial and infrastructure applications, many of which are poised for growth.
Residential activity represents less than 20% of our sales. And while near-term dynamics in this market remain challenged, we continue to view the long-term outlook as attractive, supported by population growth and a structural undersupply of housing. This diversification, combined with emerging growth drivers like data centers and treatment plant modernization provides a strong foundation for our business.
Core & Main consistently produces strong free cash flow and compelling returns on invested capital, giving us the flexibility to reinvest in the business, pursue strategic growth opportunities and return capital to shareholders. We continue to control our own destiny through disciplined execution on multiple fronts. For example, expanding into high-growth geographies, broadening our product offering in areas like treatment plants, smart meters, infusible HDPE and deploying our strong balance sheet to pursue accretive M&A opportunities, including our recent expansion into the CAD 5 billion Canadian market.
These strategic investments are expanding our addressable market, strengthening customer relationships, and positioning us to capture above-market growth as near-term headwinds survive. Equally important, our pricing discipline and gross margin expansion in recent quarters demonstrate the strength of our value proposition in addition to our team's ability to execute. We are staying focused on what we can control and building the foundation for sustained growth and profitability.
Turning now to the quarter. We delivered positive net sales growth despite tough residential demand and a tough comparison from last year, driven by contribution from acquisitions and strong performance across our sales initiatives.
Municipal construction remains strong, supported by a highly favorable funding and demand environment. The recent federal government shutdown and little-to-no impact on the municipal projects we support as roughly 95% of funding for these projects comes from state and local sources. Local utility rate revenues and municipal bonds are dependable sources of funding and certain states are also advancing new legislation to repair and upgrade aging infrastructure.
Recent actions include Texas authorizing up to $20 billion of funding for new water supply projects over the next 2 decades. New York deploying approximately $3 billion in new water infrastructure investments and Arkansas committing more than $500 million to water and sewer upgrades, each reinforcing a robust project pipeline. The state revolving funds provide a renewable source of capital to support water and wastewater infrastructure projects with current balances exceeding $100 billion in total.
Supplemental funding from the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act remains a multiyear tailwind with roughly $30 billion allocated to the states and more expected next year, but only a fraction deployed by municipality so far. Taken together, these dynamics provide long-term funding for critical water infrastructure projects that can no longer be deferred and remain essential to public health and economic development.
In nonresidential, we continue to see healthy growth in infrastructure projects such as road and bridges, education and health care and data centers. This growth is helping to offset softness in commercial, retail and office space projects. Data centers represent a low single-digit portion of our total sales mix today, but they are becoming a more meaningful driver of our growth as AI-driven capacity expands.
These projects require more water infrastructure than traditional manufacturing facilities due to cooling needs as they draw large volumes from local water supplies. This often necessitates upgrades to municipal systems and in some cases, on-site water treatment facilities to conserve usage. We also see private investment flowing to public utilities to build capacity creating opportunities for Core & Main across the municipal and private end markets.
Data center development doesn't happen in isolation. As these campuses come online, they attract workers and ancillary businesses driving demand for housing, retail and commercial services, all of which drive the need for new water infrastructure. And this concentrated population growth place a strain on local water systems triggering further investment in water distribution and treatment infrastructure. We're seeing this firsthand of the major hyperscale campus near South Bend, Indiana, where project-related demand has been so substantial that our local branches nearly tripled in size over the past few years.
In many cases, the initial investment for data centers unlocks capacity for broader municipal, residential and nonresidential expansion, creating a long-term tailwind across our core markets. As we expected and discussed on last quarter's call, residential lot development softened during the quarter, particularly in the Sun Belt markets. Builders are carefully pacing lab development against housing affordability concerns and consumer uncertainty. But as housing affordability improves in the future, we will be well positioned to capitalize on the release of pent-up demand.
Our growth initiatives continue to lay the foundation for long-term results. Let me highlight a few areas where our execution is creating competitive advantages. First, our product initiatives, including fusible HDPE treatment plant solutions and geosynthetics each achieved double-digit growth in the quarter.
As we expand our ability to deliver integrated solutions for aging water infrastructure. Meter products returned to high single-digit growth in the third quarter. Recent contract awards, including our largest metering contract award to date give us confidence in both near and long-term demand for our advanced metering products. Driving growth through geographic expansion also remains a key priority. We recently opened new branches near Houston and Denver, bringing our year-to-date total to 5 new occasions.
We expect to open more branches for fiscal year-end, and we are evaluating over a dozen additional high-growth markets for future expansion. These new branches enhance our proximity to high-growth markets and increase our service levels, supporting continued market share gains.
In September, we completed the acquisition of Canada Waterworks, further expanding our growth platform in a fragmented $5 billion Canadian addressable market. This acquisition aligns with our core strengths and increases exposure to growing end markets. Canada is a natural adjacency to our U.S. markets, and we're excited to welcome the Canada Waterworks team to Core & Main.
Integration activities are underway with a solid plan to realize synergies. While we continue to invest in growth, we remain equally focused on improving profitability. Gross margins improved by 60 basis points year-over-year to 27.2%, reflecting the success of our private label initiative and disciplined sourcing and pricing execution.
Our private label strategy continues to produce strong results, and we are on track for private label products to represent approximately 5% of our total sales this year. On SG&A, we've implemented roughly $30 million of annualized cost savings in an effort to improve operating leverage and maximize the efficiency of our business. We expect to realize these savings over the next 12 months. We remain disciplined in our headcount decisions by selectively filling critical sales roles, while reallocating resources to areas of the business with the greatest growth potential.
At the same time, we continue to invest in modern technologies to help us drive future SG&A leverage. These tools strengthen customer service, uncover more selling opportunities and expand our ability to take advantage of emerging AI capabilities. We expect these investments to enhance productivity and support margin expansion.
Our strong free cash flow provides flexibility to pursue strategic M&A, invest in organic growth and return capital to shareholders. Profitable growth remains our top capital allocation priority, supported by a robust pipeline of acquisition and greenfield opportunities.
We will remain disciplined on valuation and returns while maintaining balance sheet flexibility to drive shareholder value. As part of our disciplined capital allocation strategy, earlier this morning, we announced a $500 million increase to our share repurchase authorization.
This action reflects our conviction in our growth outlook and free cash flow generation, and the Board shared confidence in our ability to continue creating long-term shareholder value. With this expanded capacity, we can act opportunistically as market conditions present attractive opportunities.
We are gaining momentum across our sales, growth margin and operational initiatives. Strengthening our ability to drive organic growth, expand margins and achieving operating leverage. We remain confident in the attractiveness of our end markets over the medium and long term and we continue to invest in our associates and value-added capabilities to capture growth and market share.
In closing, I want to express my sincere appreciation for our teams across the country. Their dedication and focus on execution have been instrumental in advancing our strategic priorities, and I couldn't be more proud of what we've accomplished together this year.
Thank you for your continued support and confidence in our vision. With that, I'll turn the call over to Robyn to review our third quarter financial results and outlook for the year. Go ahead, Robyn.
Thanks, Mark. Good morning, everyone. I'll start on Page 7 of our presentation with some highlights from our third quarter results. Net sales increased 1% to $2.1 billion. Organic volumes and prices were roughly flat versus prior year, while acquisitions contributed about 1 point of growth. We delivered positive pricing across nearly all product categories in the third quarter. The one exception was municipal PVC pipe where prices are down roughly 15% year-over-year and nearly 40% from the 2022 peak. .
As we've noted in prior quarters, even with the continued moderation in PVC pipe pricing, our discipline has enabled us to sustain a stable price environment overall. We estimate our end markets were down low single digits in the quarter, driven by declines in residential lot development and a tough comparison from last year. The residential decline was concentrated in Sunbelt markets like Florida, Texas, Arizona and Georgia, where developers have slowed the pace of new development.
Activity appears to have stabilized as we moved through the quarter and we remain confident in the attractive long-term fundamentals of these high-growth markets. Our overall portfolio is resilient. demand continues to be a source of strength, and we're seeing solid activity in large complex nonresidential projects where our scale, product breadth and technical expertise give us a strong competitive position.
This balanced mix across end markets flexibility through varying demand environment. Gross margin in the third quarter was 27.2%, up 60 basis points year-over-year. This improvement was driven by benefits from our private label initiative and disciplined purchasing and pricing execution. Total SG&A expenses increased 8% to $295 million. SG&A growth in the quarter was driven by acquisitions, elevated inflation in areas like facilities and fleet higher employee benefits costs and strategic investments to support future growth.
SG&A in the third quarter was $7 million lower than the second quarter, reflecting a reduction in onetime items and disciplined cost management. Cost inflation in our industry typically runs in the low single-digit range annually, but it's trending closer to mid-single digits this year. Against the softer end market backdrop and no incremental pricing, the productivity gains we're delivering aren't enough to fully absorb these pressures, especially given how efficient we already operate from an SG&A as a percentage of sales standpoint. This level of inflation is not typical, and while we expect it to moderate over time, we have moved quickly to address it.
Since the last quarter, we've implemented $30 million of annualized cost savings with roughly $1 million of savings recognized in the third quarter. These savings primarily reflect reductions in personnel-related costs as we've eliminated approximately 4% of nonsales focus full since last quarter.
We expect fourth quarter SG&A to be roughly $25 million lower than the third quarter due to a seasonal reduction in sales and the results of our cost actions. Our approach is measured and focused on stripping resources without compromising customer service or long-term growth.
While we take targeted actions to improve efficiency, we continue to invest in growth-focused roles to support product line and geographic expansion, including greenfields. We have an experienced management team that understands what takes to drive operational excellence through cycles, balancing near-term efficiency with the investments required to continue positioning Core & Main for long-term growth and success.
We are committed to driving annual SG&A rate improvement going forward. Adjusted diluted EPS increased approximately 3% to $0.89 compared to $0.86 last year. Growth was driven by higher adjusted net income and the benefit of a lower share count from share repurchases. As a reminder, we exclude intangible amortization from adjusted EPS because a significant portion relates to the formation of Core & Main following our 2017 leveraged buyout. This adjusted metric better reflects the underlying earnings power and free cash flow generation of our business, which is why we view it as an important indicator of our performance.
Adjusted EBITDA of $274 million was 1% below the prior year, while adjusted EBITDA margin declined 30 basis points to 13.3%, driven by a higher SG&A as a percentage of net sales. This was partially offset by 60 basis points of gross margin expansion. Turning to the balance sheet, cash flow and capital allocation. We ended the quarter with net debt at nearly $2.1 billion and net debt leverage of 2.2x, well within our target range.
Liquidity was $1.3 billion, including $89 million of cash and the remainder under our ABL facility. Operating cash flow was $271 million, reflecting nearly 100% conversion from adjusted EBITDA and highlighting the strength of our cash generation ability. Over the last 12 months, we have generated free cash flow equal to 5.6% of our market capitalization, a level that has more than doubled the average free cash flow yield of S&P 500 companies and meaningfully above specialty distribution peers.
We returned $50 million to shareholders through share repurchases during the third quarter, reducing our share count by roughly 1 million. Year-to-date, we've repurchased approximately 2.9 million shares for $140 million, including an additional $43 million deployed so far through the fourth quarter. We announced a $500 million increase to our share repurchase authorization this morning, bringing our total capacity to approximately $684 million.
Since our 2021 IPO, we have repurchased over 15 million shares, roughly 20% of our original shares outstanding, reflecting our commitment to returning capital to shareholders. We remain opportunistic with share repurchases, and our strong cash-generating ability provides ample capacity to continue evaluating organic and inorganic instruments to maximize long-term value.
Turning to our outlook on Page 9. We are reaffirming the full year guidance we issued in September, including net sales of $7.6 billion to $7.7 billion, adjusted EBITDA of $920 million to $940 million, and operating cash flow $550 million to $610 million. Full year net sales growth is projected at 4% to 5%, excluding the impact of one fewer selling week compared to last year, which represents a roughly 2% headwind for FY '25.
End market volumes are anticipated to be flat to slightly down for the year, reflecting a low double-digit decline in residential lot development, partially offset by low to mid-single-digit growth in municipal volumes and a roughly flat nonresidential market.
Pricing is expected to have a neutral impact on sales growth, and we remain on track to deliver 2 to 4 percentage points of above-market growth. Gross margin is expected to improve year-over-year supported by continued private label growth and disciplined purchasing and pricing execution. We have successfully mitigated a dynamic environment over the last few years, and I'm extremely proud of how consistently our teams have executed.
We've meaningfully expanded our market share while broadening our addressable market through product and service adjacencies. We've demonstrated disciplined pricing, deliver sustainable gross margin expansion and generated strong free cash flow to reinvest in the business and return capital to shareholders. Our next objective is to convert that momentum into stronger growth and improved SG&A leverage.
We have the management team in place to execute on that plan, supported by a long track record of operational excellence and disciplined cost management. We remain confident in the long-term fundamentals of our end markets and with the strategic investments we've made, combined with our balance sheet flexibility and improve execution, we are well positioned to continue growing above the market through disciplined execution, value-accretive M&A and the exceptional service that enables us to support our customers and capture opportunities.
With that, we'll open the call for questions.
[Operator Instructions] Our first question for today comes from Ryan Biros of Thompson Research Group.
2. Question Answer
Can you talk about the large complex projects that you talked about, if you have any updated market share numbers, growth rates or kind of revenue exposure numbers. Our understanding from a variety of contexts of these projects, depending on how you classify them, are seeing growth rates well above other end markets. And that distributors still play a critical role in these projects, maybe even more so.
As many products are still going through distribution as opposed to OEM direct helping control the flow of products to the site. So just curious to what you're seeing given the value you provide there to these large projects?
Yes, Brian. It's Mark. We're excited about these complex projects, in particular, the data center activity that we've seen out there and for a number of reasons and some of which you mentioned there, I mean, these fit really right into our value proposition where these local relationships with the underground contractors really matter. They really rely on that local distribution to get them all the products that they need, and that's on scale really comes into play as well and having access to all the material that they need to really be that one-stop shop for our customers.
So it really becomes critical, the ability to be able to timely supply all the products that they need, the pace of these projects as quick as you can imagine. And we're in a really good position just given our geographic diversity to capture a lot of that business. And I gave that example on the call about a market that Rob and I recently visited about a year ago to really see this in action and on-site and talking to the customers there about really the value proposition and how they rely on our consistent and quality service that we provide really puts us in a great position, then as these projects pop up in other markets. And in many cases, those customers travel to the next project. And we're really in a great position to capture that.
So yes, we've seen really good growth in communities where these pop up. I'd say, as I've mentioned, this is still kind of a low single-digit overall exposure for us, but we've seen it grow rapidly. And like I said, really excited about really the growth that that's driving in that space. I'd say and what we see as these projects typically put a lot of demands on the water systems. That does a couple of things. One, it increases the value of water in a lot of these communities, which puts money back into the communities for further investment and then obviously puts a strain on the systems as well, which requires additional investment typically, some of which is done by the companies that are building these projects and then turned over to the municipality.
So we've just really seen a lot of characteristics there that drive some long-term demand for us, and I'm excited about that.
Yes. I'd be interested where that goes over the next few years. I guess on the guidance, it looks like it's largely maintained. But I think the municipal outlook was raised slowly, now expected to be up low single digits to mid-single digits, where last quarter, look like it was just low single digits. So maybe just what's causing that slight raise? And is that just a short-term timing kind of for Q4? Or is that maybe signaling we could see an improved municipal market into the mid-single digits going forward for you guys?
Yes. Thanks, Brian. We have a lot of confidence in our municipal end market. There's significant funding going in there all at all levels. So -- on the federal side, there's still ample funding coming in at those levels, very little of the IIJA spending has been spent really at all with the municipalities are using a lot of local water funds to support their projects, and we're seeing them increase rates to customers there. So there are good tailwinds there. And then like Mark mentioned in the prepared remarks, there's a lot of state-level funding going out to support municipalities as well.
So did lift it a little bit, but just feel really good about the municipal end market over the short term, medium term, long term.
Our next question comes from Matthew Bouley of Barclays.
I wanted to follow up on the end market side. Obviously, you just touched on muni. What I'm getting at is if you have any kind of early thoughts on 2026. So given where municipal is, I think I heard you say residential might have been some signs of stabilization in Q3. Obviously, you got non-reservoir it sounds like the data center piece is driving things. So just I don't know, any help on kind of early thoughts and directional trends into 2026 there?
Yes. Thanks, Matt. It's Mark. Yes. As Robyn touched on in terms of the municipal end market, we continue to see that as a really strong, steady growth for us as we wrap up 2025 and into 2026 and beyond. Nonresidential for us is, like we've talked about on previous calls, it's a mixed bag there.
We've seen some really good strength in areas like these more complex projects that we see, and then there's been pockets of softness with the lighter commercial business that tends to follow some of the residential activity. So as we think about the resi side, obviously, we're watching rates closely. There's more decisions here coming up from the Fed in December, and we'll see what they touch on in terms of the outlook.
So we want to see a little bit more on that front before we call residential as we go forward. It clearly softened into the second half of the year, which we warn people at earlier this year. So we're likely to see maybe a bit of a headwind as we start off 2026. But just given the overall levels of residential, I think we've covered most of that risk for any further softening of that. I would expect that at some point here, that pent-up demand is going to release, and we'll be back into really good residential growth that could then spur some of that additional commercial development.
And I think on top of kind of continued investment in these data centers, I don't see that slowing down here anytime soon that provides a really good backdrop here at some point when we see that resi market release.
Okay. Got it. Second one, kind of jumping into the margins. Obviously, a solid gross margin result there above 27%. So if I heard you correctly, I think you said SG&A would be down $25 million sequentially in Q4. And correct me if I'm wrong, but that seems to imply the gross margin probably ends up fairly similar sequentially. So I'm just curious if this kind of 7% level is sort of a new normal here? And any sort of additional color there on what's driving this there?
Yes. Sure. Matt, I'll take that one. So you're right. We had really strong gross margin performance in the quarter, driven by growth in our private label initiative. We did a really good job with some purchasing and pricing execution in the quarter. And we do expect to be able to continue to enhance gross margins from here, leveraging some of those margin initiatives that we've talked about.
Gross margin in the fourth quarter should be -- it's probably going to be more in the range between the second and third quarter. Third quarter will probably be a little bit higher, maybe the peak level for the year as it can move around a little bit, but expecting a good result in the fourth quarter for gross margins, expecting -- you're right, expecting to bring SG&A down by about $25 million as we start to recognize some of the cost actions that we've done already. So should be a good result there. And then we expect to, like I said, continue to expand gross margins annually from there. It might not be exactly perfect sequentially every quarter. But on an annual basis, we expect to get that expansion.
Our next question comes from David Manthey of Baird.
First question on the top line. Last quarter, you said you expected residential to continue to soften through the second half. And Robyn, if I heard you right, you said you're seeing stabilization at the end of the third quarter. I don't want to read too much into that, and I know it's not getting stronger, but is that a slightly more optimistic residential view than you were expecting 90 days ago?
Yes. Thanks, Dave. For resi, we started to see, like we talked about on the last quarter call, we really started to see that soften at the end of July, and it really continued into August, September and October. So for the full quarter, it was soft and it was down in that kind of low double digits to mid-teens range for the quarter. I wouldn't say we've seen good movement there. We've just seen it kind of soften as homebuilders were developing less lots, awaiting some better affordability and some better demand there. So not a lot of movement during the quarter, but it did really perform in line with what we expected. We started to see some of that soften late last quarter and saw that continue throughout the quarter.
Okay. And Second, on gross margin. With private label at 5% of the mix, it doesn't seem large enough to move the needle. I know you talked about it a lot, and I'm sure there's a wide disparity between all other products and private label. But could you maybe talk about the magnitude of that in terms of stack ranking relative to gross margin benefit? And then you mentioned some of the other sourcing and pricing initiatives. Could you really lean into those a little bit and give us an idea of maybe some of those other buckets that are lifting gross margin? And how much opportunity remains in the coming, say, 1 to 3 years? .
Yes, sure. So private label is a big driver for us. And I would say in the quarter, a good portion of that was driven by private label growth and then -- the other half or less than half was driven by our really strong execution on purchasing and pricing. And private label has expanded our margins, I would say, pretty significantly over the last several years since we started getting into this and driving the growth there.
So we're really happy with the 5% of sales that we will have at the end of this year. Our long-term target there is in that 10% to 15% range. So lots of opportunity to continue to expand there. As we move forward into the upcoming years, I would say private label is going to still be a pretty big driver there.
We think that can drive something like 10 to 20 basis points a year, some of our sourcing initiatives can drive additional margin enhancement on top of that. So those are areas that we have a lot of confidence and ability to continue to drive the gross margin improvement. Sourcing is a lot of managing the relationships with our suppliers and spend -- shifting our spend where is the best positioning us in the marketplace. And then on the purchasing side, we did a really nice job this year of buying ahead of price increases similar to how we always do. We see price increases coming to the market kind of in the early spring time frame. And we're always constantly managing our inventory to make sure we're optimizing margin as much as possible.
Our next question comes from Nigel Coe of Wolfe Research.
Just want to go back to SG&A. So the guide for 4Q, does that fully embed the run rate of SG&A savings? That $30 million analyzed that will be baked into 4Q? And then on the one hand, you're talking about you're running very lean right now. But then I think the slides and you referenced you're exploring further opportunities. So it's actually wondering what kind of direction you're moving in, in terms of looking at further productivity?
Yes. Sure, Nigel. Thanks for the question. So the $30 million, a lot of that will hit in Q4 from a run rate perspective, not all of it. I would say it's probably going to be more in the kind of $5 million range of SG&A savings impact in the fourth quarter from some of the actions that we've taken. .
Some of them will go into effect. We've executed on the changes, but we'll realize more of the savings in FY '26. So we won't get the full run rate in Q4, but we'll get the full run rate into FY '26. And then remind me of your second question, Nigel?
Yes. The second part of the question was really around -- on the one hand, you're talking about you're running very lean, you're not going to sacrifice growth initiative, et cetera. But then you also then talk about other productivity actions you're exploring. So I'm just wondering what direction you see above and beyond that $30 million?
Yes, sure. Yes. And we do -- we -- if you compare us to others, we do have a very efficient SG&A rate already. We haven't gotten the operating leverage that we expected lately, and so that's where the cost-out actions came from. We do have a lot of things that we're working on to gain additional productivity in addition to the cost-out actions that we've already taken. And a lot of that stems around technology to make us more efficient to service our customers better, to automate more in the back office.
And so we have made some investments in technology that we believe will result in further productivity and help us get that SG&A leverage starting into next year.
Our next question comes from Joe Ritchie of Goldman Sachs.
So I wanted to touch on the private label discussion again. Can you just -- maybe just elaborate on what the constraint is on potentially moving private label in that initiative since you are seeing some good gains from that? And then where are you seeing the biggest penetration across your product lines or systems?
Yes, Joe, it's Mark. Thanks for the question. Yes, I would tell you on private label, we've been really pleased with the progress that we've made there. We've expanded our capabilities there pretty significantly, things that you need to continue to grow it at that pace, obviously include a lot of the product work that's done. We've got great engineers and researchers that help us on that product development that has to be sourced and vetted to continue to end up through the system. You need the logistics capability. So we continue to invest in distribution space and facilities and equipment to work all that product through the system.
Obviously, you need some customer acceptance on that side. So these are all kind of well-ingrained processes that we have to continue to expand that and has really been the key piece to -- as Robyn mentioned, allow us to expand gross margins here over the past few years. So we've got continued opportunities there. That's big part of what we continue to look at.
I'd say we've got a really solid plan over the next 2 to 3 years to expand that. I think a pace of 1 point or so a year is something that we felt as achievable and something that we've been able to deliver historically. So we'll continue to work down those paths and think should expect to see that growth as we move forward.
Got it. That's helpful, Mark. And then I guess my follow-on question, look, it's interesting to hear you talking about the data center opportunity. Clearly, that is going to continue to accelerate, and there's a lot of momentum in the market. I guess as you think about your positioning, your capabilities, whether you need to make investments in certain regions in order to participate in a more meaningful way going forward. Maybe just kind of talk a little bit through like whether there is additional investment that's necessary. And then also, to some degree, why it's such a small portion of your business today, given that there has been development over the last few years?
Yes. Thanks, Joe. As it relates to the scale, I think we obviously participate on a lot of projects all throughout the country, large-scale water replacement projects, other types of commercial and residential development. So this is still a good and important part of our business that's growing rapidly. I would tell you, we're always looking to make additional investments and improve our market position across the country, but we're -- we've got a great foundation. We have a broad geographic reach.
So wherever these hyperscalers go to make these investments. We're always in a good kind of foundational position based on the local relationships that we have. It's still very much a local business. It's typically some of our best customers that are working on these types of projects because they're so critical to those developers to be successful where we've got the best relationships locally. We tend to get a lot of this work in areas where we need to earn those relationships with the customers that are doing that work.
Those are investments that we make similar that we would operate in other markets where we're trying to improve our market position. So you should expect as there is growth in data centers in certain markets that we're looking to enhance our capabilities, build out our capacity and make sure that we can serve that to the best of the customers' needs.
So I think it looks very similar in terms of the investments. We've also got national relationships with some of the large contractors to get involved in these. So we attack it from various aspects, and we'll continue to invest to make sure that we get more than our fair share of that business.
Our next question comes from Anthony Pettinari of Citi.
Robyn, you had talked about cost inflation running kind of mid-single digit versus maybe more typical low single-digit rate. And I'm wondering if you could give any more context in terms of the drivers there? And then just maybe in terms of cadence, like when those comps get easier when you might expect that rate to normalize or any other color there?
Sure. Yes, I would say the areas that we've seen driving the majority of the inflation this year have been on our facilities, on our fleet and on medical costs. So those are the main drivers. Obviously, those are some big buckets of costs for us are our largest bucket of cost is personnel-related expense and then it's our facilities after that.
So as we go through and renew some leases that we've had in the past that -- we've gotten really good pricing on some of those fair market values are up and causing some inflation there. And then -- similarly on the fleet, we've just seen inflation there over time. And then medical is an area that we've had a big impact last quarter. We had a lot of high-cost claims, but there's also a lot of inflation hitting that area.
So expect that to continue into the fourth quarter. Don't have a lot of that remediating in the fourth quarter yet. But I would say we started -- we'll probably anniversary around that around the second quarter of next year. That's when we started to see the larger impacts of that inflation. So do expect it to moderate at some point in the coming quarters and get back to something that's a little bit more normalized for our industry.
Okay. That's very helpful. And then just following up on data centers. Mark, I think that you made a reference to these being quick projects. I'm not sure if I heard that right. But in terms of kind of visibility into these projects, maybe time line, I'm sure it's hard to generalize, but is it possible to talk about sort of maybe what a typical project looks like in terms of your visibility into the demand and the time line and completing that?
Yes. Thanks, Anthony. Yes, I'm happy to clarify that. These projects are -- they're not completed quickly. They're -- I'd say, the pace of construction of these is at a pace that requires that operational excellence that we provide our customers. So they're fast pace projects, they can last several years based on the nature of the build-out.
We've seen some of the projects that we've worked on just they continue to add phases to these projects. So we'll get pretty good visibility out as we get involved in these, at least kind of a year out of work that's being done, and then those projects can then expand beyond their based on what we've seen. So they can last quite a while, but your pace that you have to execute at is very quick, and that's where the trust that our customers place in us really comes in hand our ability to execute these projects so that they can be successful and they can be a preferred contractor on these projects going forward.
That's when it really becomes a win-win for us and our customers when we're both working to complete those projects as efficiently as possible.
Our next question comes from Patrick Bauman of JPMorgan.
Had a couple cleanups here. Just on pricing, I think you said muni PVC pipe down about 15% in the quarter year-over-year kind of implies everything else was up like low single digits. Is that -- is that right? And then is that kind of that algo? Do you expect that to continue into '26 such that prices on net will remain stable?
Yes. Thanks, Pat. That's right. PVC pricing has kind of come down off its peak levels over time, and that's the right range of what we're seeing. Don't expect -- we don't expect a lot of changes from this point in the year. So pricing flat for the year. And as we get into FY '26, we'll provide more details on the next call. But expecting pricing to be at least flattish for FY '26. We could have some product categories that are down, but expect the majority of them to be up overall. So I feel like that's going to be stable at minimum.
What are you seeing in other commodity products outside of the PVC stock? Yes. .
Yes, well -- yes, if you think about steel and copper are really only true commodities that we have that move with the underlying markets, and those would both have price favorability for the year, they've been price favorable for a while, and I would expect that to continue. So those are small areas of our overall products and sales, but those are up, I would say, virtually every product except where the municipal PVC is up year-over-year.
And is also up?
Yes, that's right.
Okay. And then on the M&A pipeline, can you just talk about like what you're seeing there? We've been a little bit of a lull here in terms of activity what's causing that? And what -- how should we think about you guys deploying capital to M&A over the next 6 to 12 months? .
Yes, Pat, it's Mark. We're still very excited about the M&A pipeline that we've got. We've got some very active deals that we're working right now. We got many opportunities that we continue to see out on the horizon there has been, I'd say, a lull in the deals that are out in the market. We haven't, I'd say, missed out on anything in the market.
I just want to assure you of that. It has been a I'd say, a lull in activity. But we are working some in real time that we're excited about and expect you'll hear some announcements from us soon, and we continue to be very active on that front. So I'd expect from a capital deployment perspective, our priorities haven't changed. We'll continue to invest organically. We will deploy capital for M&A, and we'll continue to look at share repurchases as an authorization that we announced this morning. So continued right along with our strategy and the priorities that we've laid out.
Our next question comes from Sam Reid of Wells Fargo.
Just looking for a little bit more detail on the SG&A cuts. And perhaps could you just give us a sampling of some of the, call it, maybe more back office type jobs that you're eliminating as part of this process? Are they concentrated at the branch level more skewed towards corporate? Just love some additional perspective there.
Yes. Thanks for the question, Sam. We did -- like I said on the call, $40 million of cost out, the majority of that is personnel-related costs. We were able to make reductions in about 4% of our overall. We were not focused on anything that was driving sales.
I mean, we talked about in the last quarter that these were going to be very targeted actions, and we weren't going to do anything to compromise any customer service or long-term growth. And I think we've done a really good job of making sure those were targeted.
On the back office side, I would say, over time, we've been able to leverage technology and become more efficient. So I wouldn't point to any particular role, but I would say we were able to make some changes generally across the board to take cost out overall and then some additional kind of supporting functions.
So it was a mix of head count, which is why we didn't talk about it in a detailed way on the last call because we knew it was going to be a little bit broad in across the board, but also kind of very targeted to specific areas that maybe we've had some overlap from M&A or maybe we've converted systems, and we're able to become more efficient in that way.
That helps, Robyn. And then to switch gears here, just want to drill down a little bit on the muni -- or the meter business, I should say. It sounds like you were awarded a meter contract this quarter, if I'm not mistaken. Just maybe a little additional context on that. And then talk to the high single-digit growth -- just maybe give me some context on whether that's coming from newer projects or whether that's more kind of just recurring from kind of some of your longer-term meter contracts?
Yes. Thanks, Sam. It's Mark. We continue to be really successful on the smart meter front. We've been, I would say, pivotal in advancing the digitization of the municipalities. And this is an area where we can really drive demand by going in and selling the value that we can bring by really converting them from a manual or kind of a legacy maybe first generation system that they put in really provide them the advantages of a modern system.
So we've been, I'd say, very successful in many parts of the country selling some of the largest municipalities now, which have been, I'd say, some of the slower adopters of the technology. So we're really starting to see some movement there and really gain the confidence of our manufacturer partners that we help sell their products for to really be the lead and drive the demand of the system enhancements for the municipality.
So real pleased with the progress there. We have achieved that over the last couple of years, some of the largest projects and not only our company's history, but in the country's history in terms of the size and scale of these. So that's going to be a continued driver of growth for us and just really excited about the performance of our team there and continue to expect good growth ahead of us.
Our next question comes from Matt Johnson of UBS.
Cities, first off, if we could just talk a little bit about greenfields. I think you guys have opened 5 year-to-date is what you said. I guess could you guys provide a little more color on, I guess, your ambitions for the rest of the year. Are there any specific markets that you're targeting, whether it be in the U.S. or Canada? And then its target for FY '26 also to open 5 to 10 new greenfields?
Yes. Thanks for the question. Yes, we are really excited about some of the greenfields that we've got open this year. As we've mentioned on the call, a couple of good markets or we've got coverage today but really looking to continue to expand in both Denver and Houston is really priority markets for us.
We've got I'd say, several more identified, a few of which I expect will get opened between now and the end of the year still and a really good pipeline ahead of us that we're evaluating. We've got over a dozen markets right now that we're assessing for continued attention and growth and expect you'll see continued growth from a greenfield perspective.
As we've talked about on previous calls, we typically are able to get those profitable within at least breakeven within the first year and profitable in years 2 and 3. And we've had really good success there as we've opened more this year. And the ones we've opened in prior years were continuing to perform as well.
So that will be a continued strategy that you see as we look to continue to expand our geographic presence, and that would be both in the U.S. and in Canada.
That's great. And then I guess just one more for me. You guys talked a little bit about some of the different state funding that's gone, I think, across Texas, New York and Arkansas. And I think the number in Texas is far larger around $20 billion. So I guess, could you guys talk a little bit about how large the Texas market is for you guys and kind of what your participation rate looks like in that state and kind of how impactful you think this new bill could be for you guys moving forward?
Yes. Texas is a very important market for us. As you can imagine, as you think about construction spend across the U.S. for us, Florida Texas, California. Those are really important markets and they tend to drive just in those 3 states on can really drive our business. So this additional investment into Texas, I think it will be really important to us. We've got good strong position in Texas and expect us to be able to capitalize on that.
In addition, Texas has had other advancements. One of the elements that we're excited about, which is very long-term oriented that they now provide for corrugated HDPE as a solution for a lot of storm drainage work, and Texas, which has been a heavy concrete market as well.
So as we work to advance a lot of those products into the products that we distribute that can be another good long-term growth driver. That's not -- those investments aren't things that happen overnight, but really set up a good foundation and you'll continue to see us invest in Texas, just like we announced the greenfield in Houston. I'd expect that you'll continue to see us make more investments in the state.
At this time, I'll now pass it back to Mark Witkowski for any further remarks.
Thank you all again for joining us today. Before we close, I want to leave you with a few key points. Over the last several years, Core & Main has executed exceptionally well through an unprecedented environment. We captured benefits from large price increases in 2021 and 2022, committed to holding it, and that is exactly what we've delivered. During that period, we also said we were over earning gross margin by roughly 100 to 150 basis points. We moved through that normalization exactly as we expected, and we're now back to delivering steady structural gross margin expansion.
Today, we're managing through stubborn inflation, higher cost and softer end markets. But we're not standing still. We've executed cost actions and we see a clear path to generate future growth and operating leverage. Our strategic investments and sales initiatives are creating real share gains and our diversified model positions us to generate resilient profitable growth.
We've navigated several unusual years with discipline, consistency and transparency and we're confident in our ability to deliver long-term value as the market returns to a more supportive backdrop. Thank you for your continued interest in Core & Main. Operator, that concludes our call.
Thank you all for joining today's call. You may now disconnect the lines.
Core & Main — Q3 2026 Earnings Call
Core & Main — Q2 2026 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Hello, and welcome to the Core & Main Q2 2025 Earnings Call. My name is Alex, and I'll be coordinating today's call. [Operator Instructions] I'll now hand it over to Glenn Floyd, Director of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Good morning, and thank you for joining us. I'm Glenn Floyd, Director of Investor Relations at Core & Main. We appreciate you taking the time to be with us today for our fiscal 2025 second quarter earnings call. Joining me this morning are Mark Witkowski, our Chief Executive Officer; and Robyn Bradbury, our Chief Financial Officer. On today's call, Mark will begin by sharing an overview of our business and recent performance. Robyn will follow with a review of our second quarter results and our outlook for the rest of fiscal 2025. We'll then open the line for Q&A, and Mark will wrap up with closing remarks.
As a reminder, our press release, presentation materials and the statements made during today's call may include forward-looking statements. These are subject to various risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations. For more information, please refer to the cautionary statements included in our earnings press release and in our filings with the SEC. We will also reference certain non-GAAP financial measures during today's discussion. We believe these metrics provide useful insight into the underlying performance of our business. Reconciliations to the most comparable GAAP measure are available in both our earnings press release and the appendix of today's investor presentation.
Thank you again for your interest in Core & Main. I'll now turn the call over to our Chief Executive Officer, Mark Witkowski.
Thanks, Glenn, and good morning, everyone. We appreciate you joining us today. If you're following along with our second quarter earnings presentation, I'll begin on Page 5 with a business update. I'm proud of our associates' dedication to supporting customers and delivering critical infrastructure projects. Our teams drove nearly 7% net sales growth in the quarter, including roughly 5% organic growth. Municipal demand remained healthy, supported by traditional repair and replacement activity, advanced metering infrastructure conversion projects and the construction of new water and wastewater treatment facilities. Our nonresidential end market was stable in the quarter. Highway and street projects remain strong, institutional construction has been steady, and we're seeing continued momentum from data centers. While data centers represent a small portion of our sales mix today, customer sentiment points to continued growth in this space, and we expect it to become a larger portion of our sales mix over time.
On the residential side, lot development for single-family housing, which accounts for roughly 20% of our sales, slowed during the quarter, especially in previously fast-growing Sunbelt markets. We believe higher interest rates, affordability concerns and lower consumer confidence are weighing on demand for new homes. And until these macro headwinds ease, we expect activity in this end market will continue to soften through the second half. As a result, we are factoring in a lower residential outlook into our full year expectations, which Robyn will speak to in more detail. Against this market backdrop, we drove significant sales growth and market share gains across key initiatives, including treatment plant and fusible high-density polyethylene projects, where our technical expertise and consistent execution continue to differentiate Core & Main in the industry.
We are also deepening relationships with large regional and national contractors, especially those pursuing critical infrastructure projects across the country. These customers increasingly value our ability to support them with consistent service, scale and product availability wherever their projects take them. Sales of meter products declined year-over-year, primarily due to project delays in the current year and a difficult comparison to last year's 48% growth rate. However, we have a growing backlog of metering projects we expect to release in the second half of the year, supporting our expectation for strong full year metering sales growth. Additionally, a healthy pipeline of bids and continued project awards gives us confidence in both the near- and long-term outlook for metering upgrade projects.
Gross margins performed well in the quarter at 26.8%, up 10 basis points sequentially from Q1 and up 40 basis points year-over-year. Our gross margins reflect strong execution of our private label and sourcing initiatives, while our local teams continue to capture market share. At the end of the day, our performance is largely driven by how well we support our customers, making sure they have the right products at the right time with the service they need to keep projects on schedule and on budget. At the same time, our operating costs were elevated this quarter. We've experienced unusually high employee benefit costs and inflation in other categories like facilities, fleet and other distribution-related expenses.
We have also carried higher costs from recent acquisitions, which have contributed to sales growth but have not yet reached their full synergy potential. Although we anticipated some of these pressures, certain costs were more pronounced than expected. To address these factors, we have implemented targeted cost-out actions to improve productivity and operating margins. We expect a portion of the savings to be realized in the second half of this year with a larger annualized benefit in 2026. We expect to achieve additional synergies tied to recent acquisitions.
Our integration approach is phased and growth-oriented, starting with people, sales and operations to position each business for success. Once that foundation is in place, we evaluate opportunities in terms of costs and resources and develop plans to drive SG&A synergies. Our approach to cost management will be measured and focused on realigning the business with the demand environment without jeopardizing future performance, growth opportunities or the ability to serve our customers. We remain confident in the long-term growth and profitability prospects of Core & Main, including our ability to drive SG&A improvements and generate substantial value for shareholders.
We continue to be balanced in how we allocate capital. During the quarter, we generated $34 million of operating cash flow and deployed approximately $24 million across organic growth initiatives, share repurchases and debt service. Year-to-date, we have repurchased $47 million of shares, reducing our share count by nearly 1 million. Our growth strategy is driven by organic growth and complementary acquisitions. After the quarter, we announced the acquisition of Canada Waterworks, a 3-branch distributor of pipe, valves, fittings and storm drainage products in Ontario, Canada. We expect the transaction to close later this month, further enhancing our position in the multibillion-dollar Canadian addressable market. With this acquisition, we now have 5 locations in Ontario, all established through value-enhancing M&A. This has created a platform for meaningful growth in Canada.
On the organic side, we're making prudent investments to enhance our capabilities and better serve customers. We recently opened new locations in Kansas City and Wisconsin, strengthening our presence in priority markets. We are also evaluating additional high-growth markets for future expansion. These investments are designed to generate long-term growth, strengthen our market share and support our goal of delivering above-market growth over the coming years. We have plans to open several more locations this year, and I look forward to sharing updates on these initiatives.
Before turning the call over to Robyn, I want to reiterate my confidence in Core & Main's growth and margin expansion opportunity. We are well positioned to benefit from future investments in aging U.S. water infrastructure. We have the right team in place to execute on the opportunities ahead, and we look forward to delivering even greater value to our customers, suppliers, communities and shareholders.
Thank you for your continued support and trust in our vision. With that, I'll turn the call over to Robyn to walk through our financial results and outlook for the remainder of the year. Go ahead, Robyn.
Thanks, Mark. I'll start on Page 7 of the presentation with some highlights from our second quarter results. As Mark mentioned, we grew net sales nearly 7% in the quarter to $2.1 billion. Organic sales were up roughly 5% with the balance of growth coming from acquisitions. Prices continue to be flat overall, and our teams worked diligently to sustain pricing in an evolving tariff and end market environment. In total, we estimate that our end markets grew in the low single digits range. We outperformed the market with significant sales growth and market share gains in our treatment plant and fusible high-density polyethylene initiatives.
Gross margin came in at 26.8%, up 10 basis points from the first quarter and up 40 basis points year-over-year. The sequential and year-over-year improvement were both largely driven by continued execution of our private label and sourcing initiatives and contribution from accretive acquisitions. SG&A expenses increased 13% this quarter to $302 million. Roughly half of the $34 million increase was related to incremental costs from acquisitions and timing of onetime and other nonrecurring costs. The remainder was made up of volume-related growth, inflation and distribution-related costs and investments to drive future growth and market share gains.
We implemented certain productivity and cost-out measures earlier this year, but with higher costs and inflation continuing to pressure our operating margins and our expectation of softer residential demand, we will be taking additional targeted cost reduction actions in areas that won't impact our ability to serve customers. Importantly, we will continue to make strategic investments to strengthen the business. We're seeing strong results from our sales initiatives, and we have opportunities to accelerate that with additional investment. We intend to keep expanding through greenfield locations to better serve customers and capture share while also investing in technology solutions that improve efficiency and support long-term margin expansion.
Interest expense was $31 million in the second quarter, down from $36 million in the prior year. The decrease was primarily driven by lower fixed and variable interest rates on our senior term loan credit facilities and lower average borrowings under our ABL credit facility. Our provision for income tax was $41 million compared to $42 million in the prior year. Our effective tax rate was 22.5% for the quarter versus 25% a year ago. The decrease in effective tax rate was primarily due to tax benefits associated with equity-based compensation.
Adjusted diluted earnings per share increased approximately 13% to $0.87 compared to $0.77 in the prior year. The increase reflects higher adjusted net income as well as the benefit of a lower share count following our share repurchase activity across fiscal years 2024 and 2025. We exclude intangible amortization because a significant portion of it relates to the formation of Core & Main following our leverage buyout in 2017. We believe adjusted diluted EPS better reflects the results of our operating strategy and the value creation we're delivering for shareholders. Adjusted EBITDA increased 4% to $266 million in the quarter, while adjusted EBITDA margin declined 40 basis points to 12.7%. The decline in adjusted EBITDA margin was driven by higher SG&A as a percentage of net sales, which we are taking actions to optimize.
Turning to the balance sheet and cash flow. We ended the quarter with net debt of $2.3 billion and net debt leverage of 2.4x within our stated goals. Total liquidity was $1.1 billion, consisting primarily of availability under our ABL credit facility. Net cash provided by operating activities was $34 million in the quarter, down from $48 million in the prior year. The decline was primarily due to higher investment in working capital, partially offset by higher net income, lower tax payments and timing of interest payments. During the second quarter, we returned $8 million to shareholders through share repurchases, bringing our total for the first half of fiscal 2025 to $47 million and reducing our share count by nearly 1 million shares. As of today, we have $277 million remaining under our share repurchase program.
Next, I'll cover our revised outlook for fiscal 2025 on Page 9. We are very pleased with our sales growth, gross margin expansion and capital allocation efforts through the first half of the year. However, higher operating costs and softer residential demand have resulted in operating margins coming in below our expectations. As a result, we are lowering our guidance to reflect current market conditions and higher operating expenses. We now expect net sales of $7.6 billion to $7.7 billion, adjusted EBITDA of $920 million to $940 million, and operating cash flow of $550 million to $610 million.
We expect end market volumes to be slightly down for the full year. Municipal end market volumes are expected to grow in the low single digits, nonresidential volumes are expected to be roughly flat and residential lot development is expected to decline in the low double digits. Residential volumes were soft in the quarter and have weakened further through August, consistent with our updated guidance. We still expect pricing to have a neutral impact on full year sales, and we remain on track to deliver 2 to 4 percentage points of above-market growth. We expect adjusted EBITDA margins in the second half of the year to be slightly lower than the first half, reflecting continued gross margin performance, offset by a softer residential market and a higher SG&A rate.
In summary, we continue to execute our growth initiatives, expand gross margins and make the strategic investments needed to position the business for long-term success. We have favorable long-term demand characteristics across each of our end markets, many levers to drive organic above-market performance, a healthy M&A pipeline, and numerous opportunities to improve operating margins. We are taking targeted actions to align the business with current demand trends and deploying capital to accelerate growth and enhance shareholder returns. We are confident in our ability to execute on the opportunities ahead, and we look forward to delivering even greater value to our customers, suppliers, communities and shareholders.
With that, we'll open it up for questions.
[Operator Instructions] Our first question for today comes from Brian Biros of Thompson Research Group.
2. Question Answer
On the guidance changes, I guess, the adjustment to the resi outlook from flat to down low double digits looks to account for maybe a little bit more than the adjustment to total sales overall. So it seems like maybe there's something at least positive partially offsetting that resi impact. Maybe that's slightly better municipal market, maybe it's just recent M&A being added in. Can you just touch a little bit more on the puts and takes to the revenue guidance there? Because it seems like there's more than just the resi impact to the top line.
Yes. Thanks, Brian, for the question. You're right. Resi is the kind of the main driver for the reduction in the sales guide. We were expecting that to be flat kind of earlier in the year. It has declined kind of during the quarter, continued to soften after the quarter, and we're expecting that to be in the low double digits range now. That's the majority of the decline there. And then we do have some other areas of bright spots on the top line that are offsetting some of that. So some of our sales initiatives continue to perform really well, like things like treatment plant. Some of our fusible high-density polyethylene product lines are performing well. The municipal market remains strong with ample funding, and we're seeing a lot of demand there, too. So those are kind of the puts and takes on the top line with the revised guide.
Understood. And then second question for me, I guess, just the water category overall is kind of getting a lot of attention now. It used to kind of be a green initiative angle. Now it's seemingly a crucial part of the AI infrastructure build-out and kind of just the general reindustrialization trend. You highlighted in some of your prepared remarks and I think in the press release, things about your technical expertise, your consistent execution, leading to share gains, focusing on the larger contractors. So I guess just bigger picture here kind of going forward, where do you see, I guess, the biggest opportunities for growth with the way the water market is evolving?
Yes. Thanks, Brian. Great question. And I would tell you, we're obviously very favorable on the overall water market. And we've really seen more and more demands for water as you've seen these data centers going up in certain areas that need energy and water to satisfy those types of projects. So we're seeing the demands with projects like that. I think the value of water has improved. You're seeing rates passed at the local level more and more so that the municipalities are very healthy right now. And that's giving them more opportunities to get projects designed and ultimately improve the aging infrastructure, which is really the key piece that's really behind the multiyear tailwinds that we have in that municipal market.
But then when you throw on top of that some of the demands now for water, which are even more with some of these projects that are going on, obviously sets us up really well. And that's a big part of why we continue to invest in this business, invest in resources, invest in facilities. Those tailwinds are there. We're capturing a lot of those as you're seeing in the municipal results. We're obviously facing some temporary headwinds here with the residential market being softer. We're on the front end of a lot of this with lot development. Our results obviously go into the July period. So I think we're facing some of this a little earlier than some are seeing it on the residential side. But that municipal strength and then that strength that we're seeing with some of these projects in the nonresidential space like data centers is definitely helping offset some of that weakness.
Our next question comes from Matthew Bouley of Barclays.
So just a question on the, I guess, the makeup of the guide. So at the midpoint, I guess, revenue cut by $50 million and EBITDA cut by $45 million. So I guess I hear you on the higher operating expenses, but then you're also taking these targeted cost actions as well. So is it more just -- it just simply takes a lot of time to get these cost actions into place. You mentioned more of a 2026 impact, I believe. Or is the kind of maybe changed mix of business with residential a lot weaker impacting the margin as well? I guess just what else would explain that kind of larger decremental EBITDA margin?
Yes. Thanks, Matt. Yes, we are taking cost out. We have already taken some costs out. We started taking some out in the first quarter. We continue to do so in the second quarter. There is some kind of stubborn inflation and other higher cost areas that are continuing to offset some of that. So we will continue to do additional cost-out actions. We will see some of that in the second half, but the larger majority of that will be seen into FY '26. Some of the cost-out actions that we made earlier in the year were in our fire protection product line that was experiencing some softness given some market pressures on nonresidential at that time and also the steel pricing pressures that we were seeing in the fire protection. That has since rebounded.
So we took some cost out earlier in the year. It was very targeted to certain areas that we knew wouldn't disrupt the business, and now we're seeing that recovery, and we're well positioned for that. So we'll continue to do additional cost out, targeted actions that won't impact our ability to service our customers or service growth. We'll continue to make investments in growth. And Mark and I have been around the business for a long time. So we kind of know where those cost actions can come out and where we need to make investments.
Okay. Got it. And then secondly, just on residential specifically, obviously, a fairly substantial change to the outlook over the past -- relative to 90 days ago. So I guess what I'm trying to get at is sort of, a, your visibility into that end market? And b, maybe how did residential look during both Q1 and Q2? You're talking about kind of low double digits. I'm wondering if the expectation is that it would weaken a lot further in the second half. And so yes, just any color on that kind of cadence of residential and then just more specifically, what you're hearing from customers in that group?
Yes. Thanks, Matt. On the residential side, as we kind of worked our way into 2025, really felt like that market was going to be flat overall as we got into the first quarter. And we actually saw some pretty, I'd say, decent residential performance in Q1. Obviously, wasn't great, but we at least saw some projects going earlier in the year and obviously had a really good first quarter. And some of that was just, I'd say, better performance there than we expected.
If you go back to Q1, we were well over our consensus and expectations on the top line. And really, what we saw as we got into Q2, really saw residential weaken really throughout the quarter. We definitely started to hear some of those signs at the end of the first quarter, but it was more of like scaling back some projects and frankly, just continue to weaken as we got throughout Q2 and definitely into August, as Robyn had mentioned. So that residential really kind of whipsawed from Q1 into Q2.
We do think low double digit is the right way to look at it from here through the end of 2025. Obviously, we're expecting some kind of rate cut here in September. I think that's starting to be reflected a little bit on the mortgage rate side, but we're definitely not seeing the investments in the infrastructure from the builders. That's kind of been a mixed bag. Some are investing in land, some aren't. Definitely, we're not seeing the level of lot development going into those at this point. So the results that we're seeing, I think, are kind of reflective of what obviously we're hearing from the customers, and the scaling down is definitely what we felt in Q2. So we'll work through that. Obviously, we think there's continued significant pent-up demand that that's just creating. At some point, that's going to release, and we want to be well positioned to capture that when it does.
Our next question comes from David Manthey of Baird.
You might have just answered this in relation to one of Matt's questions there. But what was the residential market in the first half in terms of growth rate? And then your down low double-digit outlook, what does that imply for the back half?
Yes. Thanks, Dave. I'd say for the first half of the year, it was kind of down low -- or down mid-single digit to high single digit. And in the second half, obviously, I think that's overall going to be low double digit, slightly worse just to get to the low double digit over the full year.
Got it. Okay. And then maybe back on the SG&A side. I think last quarter, you said that your organic revenues were up mid-single digits and organic same-store SG&A was up 4% year-over-year. Could you provide those organic figures for this quarter as well so we can compare that?
Yes, Dave, when you think about how M&A impacted us in the quarter, it contributed about 2 points of growth to the top line. And then if you think about our growth in SG&A for total company, it contributed about 3 points of that overall growth.
Okay. And then also last quarter, thinking about operating expenses, I believe you sort of implied you're expecting to see improving SG&A as a percentage of sales each quarter as we move through the year, which on the old forecast, I think, sort of implied lower dollars each quarter. But assuming no major M&A from here, do you think that the second quarter will be the high watermark for SG&A dollars this year as you implement these cost-out actions and normal seasonality impacts those numbers?
Yes, Dave, we do. We've got -- as we talked about M&A and the record year we had in M&A that we did in the prior year, we've got a lot of opportunities there on the synergies. Those are things that we're working through. So we expect to continue to work through those and get some of those synergies recognized in the back half of the year and into FY '26. There were some onetime items in the second quarter that we don't expect to continue. So that's contributing to a little bit higher SG&A kind of rate and dollars in the quarter. And so with those things combined, we do expect to start seeing some progress on SG&A. And we do have some seasonality in there. But when you look at the SG&A rate year-over-year each quarter, we do expect that to kind of improve sequentially as we go throughout the rest of this year.
Yes. Okay. And if I could sneak one more in here as we're talking about all the seasonality and 2025 being an unusual year in terms of lack of acquisitions versus all the deals you've done historically. When you think about normal seasonality ex acquisition, sort of the organic progression, how do you think about that? Do you think about it in terms of percentage of total full year sales per quarter? Do you think of sort of quarter-to-quarter growth rate? How do you think about the seasonality? And if you could just give us an idea of what we should expect this year because of the fact that you have very few or no acquisitions other than this Canada deal you just announced?
Yes, Dave, I'll give you some color around that. So I would think about the second and the third quarter are typically similar size-wise. And then we typically see about a 15% to 20% decline in the top line from the third quarter to the fourth quarter. We can see a little bit of uplift in the first quarter from the fourth quarter, but those are typically pretty well in line. So it is a pretty kind of standard bell curve of the second and third quarter being the highest with it being a 15% to 20% decline from there ex any M&A activity.
Our next question comes from Sam Reid of Wells Fargo.
I wanted to touch on your updated guide perhaps from a slightly different perspective. Just on the second half EBITDA margins. So it sounds like you're still expecting favorable year-over-year gross margin, if I heard correctly, Robyn. But can you talk about what that looks like sequentially on the gross margin line relative to Q2? So just basically the guide path for gross margin as we look into Q3 and Q4?
Yes. Yes, we're expecting it to be stable, which would imply up in the 20 basis points range for the second quarter for gross margins. But our gross margin initiatives are performing very well. Private label has been performing well. Sourcing has been performing very well. We expect to continue to make improvements on gross margins. But I would say, as we think about the back half of the year, we're thinking about it as stable to the second quarter. We've made a lot of progress in gross margins kind of already in the first half of the year and expect to see those trends continue and be stable in the second quarter -- or second half.
That helps. And then as a follow-up, so one, could you just give us a rough sense as to the size of private label today, perhaps how much you were able to grow that in the second quarter relative to the first quarter? And then just a follow-up on the SG&A optimization initiatives. Could you just offer up some perspective on sizing those just so we have a rough sense as to where you're going to exit the year into 2026?
Yes. On the private label piece, as Robyn mentioned, we made some really good progress there, continue to drive that through the business. Right now, it's about 4% of our revenue, but I'd say steadily growing and expect that to be even more as we exit 2025. So very pleased with the new products we've introduced. The pull-through to the branch network has been strong. And if we get a little help from the volume in the second half, we'll make even more progress on pulling some more private label through. And I'll let Robyn cover the SG&A question.
I think, Sam, your question was on the sourcing side, right? We've made a lot of progress there, too...
It was on the sizing of the SG&A initiatives.
Okay. Sorry about that. Yes, let me give you a little bit of color on that, on the cost-out actions. So acquisition synergies is a big part of that and a big area that we have begun taking cost out there, and we've got a lot of opportunity. We've talked about that. Taking quite a bit of time to get through as we integrate these businesses. We've got a lot of controllable spend reductions that we've been working on with things like travel and overtime. One thing that we've done a really good job on as a business is managing headcount and any of those controllable expenses. So the sizing of it is really inflation related. Some of our incentive comp increases are a little bit larger given the improvement on gross margin. And so those are some of the big areas that we're looking at. And as you look at the back half of the year, the SG&A rate is a little bit higher than the first half, just given some of these inflationary and trends that we're seeing there.
Our next question comes from Mike Dahl of RBC.
Sorry to keep harping on the SG&A. But in terms of the actual variance versus your expectations, you've noted some things were even more pronounced. Can you just be more specific on what came in worse than expected? And then back to the question of kind of segmenting out actions, when you think about all those different actions, do you have a good way of giving us kind of roughly how much is headcount related versus kind of fleet and infrastructure related in terms of the cost outs?
Yes. Thanks, Mike. Let me break down a little bit for you the kind of the contribution in the quarter. So if you think about the 13% increase in SG&A over the year, what we talked about was about half of that was M&A-related kind of onetime nonrecurring items. So if you think about that 13% growth, about 3 points of that was M&A, and that's an area, like I said, we've got synergy opportunities there. About 1 point of that growth was related to some onetime items, some changes that we're making to improve performance over time. Those are things like retention and severance and relocations. And then we had about 2 points of, I would call it, a surge in the quarter related to just some higher medical claims, insurance costs, things like that, that are a little bit unusual and had some timing impacts in the quarter.
So that's kind of the first half. The second half of the SG&A increase year-over-year was a lot of items related to increased volume, inflation and investments that we're making into the business. So I mentioned incentive compensation. That's up more than our sales, just given our gross margin enhancement and the nature of those compensation plans that's worth about 1 point. We've seen a lot of inflation on our facilities and fleet that's worth about 1 point. On the medical side and some of those insurance claims, we've seen a lot of inflation in that area. We've seen some higher cost claims that's worth about 2 points. And then we've got a little bit of a difference in the way that the equity-based compensation is showing up. We've just got a new run rate there with 3 years of vesting. So that's worth about 1 point.
And then like Mark and I said, we're going to continue to make investments in growth. So we feel good about the long-term dynamics of this business. We're continuing to make investments in greenfields, investments in growth initiatives, investments in technology, and that's worth about a couple of points as well. So that kind of gives you the breakdown for that 13% growth that we saw in the quarter versus what we consider M&A and onetime versus kind of more structural related to volume and inflation.
Some of those inflation items were a lot higher than we were expecting. And so that's what we need to work to offset. So we've got several million dollars of cost-out actions that have been executed in the first half of the year. I would say we've got a meaningful amount of actions that are in process that we're working through. And to date, we've already managed headcount very well. It's not up much on a year-over-year basis. It's kind of more in that flatter range, and we'll take a look at that. But we're looking at areas where we can maybe not backfill, where we can have some selective hiring, where we have underperforming areas where we can take some cost out there. But we feel like we've got a lot of levers to pull here on the SG&A side. We're going to get it under control and offset some of this inflation, but we're also going to continue to make some of those investments for growth because of the long-term market dynamics.
Okay. Got it. My second question, just on pricing. I think you said it was neutral. Can you just give us a better sense of kind of how the commodity side trended through the quarter into 3Q? And as you think about kind of neutral or better for the year, just elaborate a little more on what you're seeing on finished goods versus commodity right now?
Yes, Mike, I'll take that one. On the pricing side, it kind of played out exactly the way we thought it would, neutral for the quarter. We did see some increases come through related to some of the, call them, the non-pipe-related products, some of which are imported by our suppliers. There's a little bit of tariff probably increase there into some of those prices that some of the suppliers passed along to start the year, which ultimately offset some of the moderating of the larger diameter water PVC pipe that we have. We saw some moderation of that pricing through the first half of the year. That will be likely a little bit of a headwind into the second half, but these other product categories that have seen increases has effectively offset that and expect that to continue to be stable like we've talked about for a while.
Our next question comes from Collin Verron of Deutsche Bank.
First, I just wanted to touch on the meter sales. It was a bit surprising just given the magnitude. You called out some project delays. I guess how much of the decline do you think was due to project delays? And what are your expectations for meter sales through the rest of the year and sort of how you're thinking about long-term growth in that category still?
Yes, sure. Thanks for the question. I would tell you on the meter side, the primary driver of the somewhat small decline in the quarter was the substantial growth we saw last year. We were up 48% in a quarter on meter sales. So that just gives you the magnitude of the initiative that we're driving there, and that performance last year was really, really strong. We did have some meter delays in the quarter. But really, I think the way to think about that is really just created a nice backlog for us that we expect to ship out in the back half of the year.
That's helpful color. And you guys also talked about some greenfield opportunities here. I guess how should we think about the decision between greenfield and M&A and sort of the expenses associated with opening these branches and how quickly they ramp to sort of the company average metrics?
Yes, sure. When we think about greenfields, we think about those in conjunction with M&A. So as we look across the U.S. and Canada for priority markets, we're evaluating both of those opportunities. Is there an M&A opportunity? Is there a greenfield opportunity? Both are very attractive to us. We've been able to generate really strong returns, whether we do a greenfield or an acquisition.
Obviously, if you do an acquisition, you're going to pick up that revenue and profitability much quicker. Greenfields will take a little longer, but typically, we're breaking even within the first couple of years and expect to be at kind of the company average in 3 to 5. So there is a little bit of ramp-up in cost when you do greenfields. We're definitely accelerating our greenfield strategy with, I'd say, a renewed focus on driving our organic core growth in the business and I expect that you'll continue to see greenfields open up throughout the country in these priority markets as we review them and continue to have a nice healthy pipeline of M&A as well that we're evaluating. So we like having both of those levers as we look at those priority markets.
Our next question comes from Patrick Baumann of JPMorgan.
A lot has been covered already. Just wanted to go back to the resi side quickly. So the move from flat to down low double just seems like a bigger revision than what we've seen from the starts data. So from that perspective, just trying to understand, was there like an overbuild of lots that are now being reduced at a greater magnitude than what we're seeing in starts? Maybe just address where lot development stands today to provide some context versus history and for the revision.
Yes, sure. If you go back again to the early part of the year, we felt it was going to be flat. That did kind of worsen throughout the first half of the year. I would say we probably saw some buildup in developed lots in the earlier part of the year. Obviously, single-family starts has not really met that early expectation, even though it was only kind of guided to at flat. So I think that's part of it. Obviously, we've seen a phasing down of a lot of these projects. And then we did see in parts of the country where we performed really well, frankly, in parts of Florida and the Southeast, which were pretty hot markets for a while, which was helping kind of keep resi kind of in at least that flat territory really fall off as we got late into Q2 and here to start Q3.
So we've definitely seen the activity weaken on the lot side. And we'll see ultimately when those developers decide to reinvest and get that going. I wouldn't say there's a significant amount of developed lots, but there's definitely been an increase there just given the slowdown that we've seen in single-family. But again, believe that is temporary. We'll work through that this period of time. And then we're going to be really well positioned to capture that growth as it comes back, as these rates ease, you're seeing lumber prices drop. Some of these things may ultimately lend themselves to better affordability, and we'll see that pent-up demand release.
Okay. And then on the acquisition you did, just to clean up here. I assume that's not in the guidance since it hasn't closed. Any perspective on size of that deal? And then any update on how the pipeline for M&A looks these days?
Yes, sure, Pat. The acquisition we did in Canada was a 3-branch acquisition with 2 locations around Toronto and another one in Ottawa. And I would say those branches are typical kind of branch size for us and kind of the $15 million range and really excited about that one. It really builds a great platform for us to grow from in Canada. That's now the second acquisition we've completed there. I think it gives us a really good opportunity to not only build on the synergies there that we think we can bring, but start to put in some greenfields in Canada as well. So expect some continued growth there. So one that we're really excited about. We've got a great management team with that one and it is really going to allow us to capture a lot of that addressable market in Canada that just hasn't been available for us before.
And then the pipeline continues to be healthy. We've got a series of deals that we're looking at right now, I'd say, in various stages and varying sizes. We've got a lot of different opportunities that we're evaluating right now and really excited about it. Obviously, we absorbed a lot of M&A from the 2024 year. You saw us get this one announced in Canada and excited to continue to drive that part of our growth strategy as we go forward.
Our next question comes from Anthony Pettinari of Citi.
This is Asher Sohnen on for Anthony. I just wanted to ask about the current kind of competitive environment, if that's changed at all from the prior quarter. Maybe there's industry response to kind of resi demand slowing. Just any thoughts on competitive environment?
Yes. Thanks for the question. I would tell you there's been no real meaningful change in the competitive environment. It's been pretty typical for several quarters. I expect it to continue along those lines. We've had -- I'd say, in some very limited markets across the U.S., we've had some regional competitors kind of going after each other pretty good, which frankly, plays right into our hands. I think our customers like the stability that Core & Main brings both in service and value. And overall, it's been, I'd say, a pretty typical kind of competitive environment for several quarters now.
Great. And then can you just remind us which of your product groups are kind of most exposed to the resi end markets? And if that softness in resi is making any kind of -- or that you anticipate kind of in the second half as well, kind of driving any shift in the mix or strategy around inventory positioning?
No, I wouldn't say there's a major difference on the resi side outside of -- if you think about our fire protection product category that we have is much more focused on kind of non-resi for us, which includes that multifamily piece, and most of that is kind of steel pipe on that piece of it. But the rest of the end markets for resi, non-resi and municipal really have a kind of a standard mix for the most part of all of our product categories. It's obviously very local. It depends on what those local specifications are.
Really, for us, it's really an assessment of where we're aligning some of those resources. So if resi gets softer in an area, we may move some of that head count and resources into other areas that are driving growth. So when we think about resource allocation, that's really more of how we think about the moves that we've got to make. And as part of the kind of the targeted actions that Robyn was referring to that we're making and putting in place, so we can continue to invest in the business where we're growing. Where there's market headwinds or underperformance, we're shifting some of those resources and ultimately managing the cost that way to make sure we continue to capture the growth that's there.
Our next question comes from Keith Hughes of Truist Securities.
This is Julian on for Keith. I know you already touched on it a little bit, but how should we think about the pricing in third quarter versus fourth quarter?
For pricing, we're expecting it to be flattish for the remainder of the year, and I would think about that for both the third quarter and the fourth quarter. The pricing has been very stable over the last few quarters now, and we're expecting that to continue. So I would say no notable changes expected there.
Our next question comes from Nigel Coe of Wolfe Research.
Yes, look, we've touched on a lot of the stuff here. But I just want to circle back to SG&A, if I may. Just so I understand the guide, if gross margins are going to be fairly flat to second quarter, it seems like SG&A dollars stepped down versus the $302 million in 2Q. Just want to make sure that's correct. And I'm just wondering what the impact of the 53rd week has on SG&A specifically.
Yes. Thanks, Nigel. You're right. The SG&A dollars are going to step down quite a bit in the second half compared to the first half, and that's related to cost-out actions and also just the lower volumes that we're expecting, which then creates a little bit of pressure on the rate in the second half because of the lower volumes. But you're thinking about that the right way. And then the way that we're thinking about the 53rd week, that's an extra -- or 1 less week of sales kind of we categorize it in the fourth quarter in that January time frame. Obviously, there's variable SG&A related to that, that will come out. But when you think about it from an EBITDA perspective, it should be in that kind of $8 million to $10 million range.
Okay. That's helpful. And then obviously, I think we understand the drivers of the residential weakness and maybe the flat outlook was a tad optimistic in hindsight. Nonres, I think, is the big debate, though, and it seems it could go in 2 directions here. We've got a weakening economy, but then we've got a lot of these mega projects, data centers, et cetera. So I'm just curious, Mark, Robyn, how you see, based on, I don't know, feedback from the field, customers, what sort of direction do you think this breaks into as we go into 2026? Do you think nonres as a category gets stronger? Or is there some risk there as you go into '26?
Yes. Thanks, Nigel. I think that's definitely how we're seeing the nonresidential area right now. There's a lot of puts and takes in that market, both by project types and, frankly, by geography as well. So we're seeing a lot of variation there. I do think there's a lot of good things there to be excited about, in particular, on the highway work, street work, that we get a lot of storm drainage product put in place on those types of projects. That's been really strong. The data center activity seems like that's got plenty of legs to it yet, and we pick up, I'd say, more than our fair share of that work, which has really helped cushion some of the softer commercial and retail kind of development in that area, which I wouldn't expect that we're going to see any near-term return of that really until we see some of the pent-up residential start to release.
So I'd expect probably more of the same out of non-resi kind of for us. Just given our exposure there and how those work, it's going to -- kind of just the broad project types that we service, it's going to kind of flatten out, which is what we've experienced in '25. So I wouldn't see a lot of upside or downside as we think about that one going forward, at least in the very near term.
At this time, I'll now hand back to Mark Witkowski for any further remarks.
Thank you all again for joining us today. I want to close out by recognizing our associates for their dedication and commitment to delivering exceptional service to our customers. This quarter, we delivered solid sales growth driven by resilient end market demand, stable pricing and continued market share gains. We're seeing strong results from our growth initiatives, and we believe there's an opportunity to accelerate that momentum with additional investment. We recently expanded our presence with new locations in priority markets and announced an acquisition that broadens our footprint in Canada. These actions reflect our disciplined approach to investing in the business to drive long-term growth.
We're well positioned to capitalize on long-term secular drivers of water infrastructure investment, including aging systems, population growth and increasing regulatory requirements. With the right team in place, a growing platform and a proven strategy, we are confident in our ability to execute on the opportunities ahead and deliver even greater value to our customers, suppliers, communities and shareholders.
Thank you for your continued interest in Core & Main. Operator, that concludes our call.
Core & Main — Q2 2026 Earnings Call
Financial data from Core & Main
Revenue
Revenue is the sum of all sales generated by a company, e.g. for its products or services.
Revenue (TTM) metric explainedDirect Costs
Direct costs are the costs incurred directly in connection with the manufacture of the product or service.
Gross Profit
Gross Profit indicates how much of the revenue remains in the company after deducting direct production costs. If the percentage share of sales is calculated, this is referred to as the gross margin.
Gross Profit metric explainedSelling and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) include all expenses for marketing and sales as well as the general administration of the company.
Research and Development Expense
Research and development costs (R&D) provide information on how much the company invests in the research and development of its products. The costs are particularly interesting as a percentage of revenue and in comparison to direct competitors.
EBITDA
EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization) is the company's earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. The EBITDA margin is calculated as a percentage of sales.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation represents reductions in the value of the company's assets (e.g. due to wear and tear on machinery).
EBIT (Operating Income)
EBIT (Earnings Before Interest and Taxes) is the company's profit before interest and taxes, also known as the operating income. The EBIT Margin is calculated as a percentage of sales at
.
Net Profit
Net Profit represents the profit or loss after deduction of all costs.
Net Profit metric explainedStocksGuide Premium
| Aug '26 |
+/-
%
|
||
| Revenue | 7,698 7,698 |
1%
1%
100%
|
|
| - Direct Costs | 5,616 5,616 |
1%
1%
73%
|
|
| Gross Profit | 2,082 2,082 |
1%
1%
27%
|
|
| - Selling and Administrative Expenses | 1,159 1,159 |
1%
1%
15%
|
|
| - Research and Development Expense | - - |
-
-
|
|
| EBITDA | 923 923 |
1%
1%
12%
|
|
| - Depreciation and Amortization | 181 181 |
2%
2%
2%
|
|
| EBIT (Operating Income) EBIT | 742 742 |
2%
2%
10%
|
|
| Net Profit | 459 459 |
6%
6%
6%
|
|
In millions USD.
Don't miss a Thing! We will send you all news about Core & Main directly to your mailbox free of charge.
If you wish, we will send you an e-mail every morning with news on stocks of your portfolios.
Core & Main Stock News
Company Profile
Core & Main, Inc. is a specialty distributor focused on water, wastewater, storm drainage and fire protection products, and related services. The company provides infrastructure solutions to municipalities, private water companies and professional contractors across municipal, non-residential, and residential end markets, nationwide. The firm with various branches across the U.S., provides its customers local expertise backed by a national supply chain. The company was founded in 1874 and is headquartered in St. Louis, MO.
StocksGuide Premium
| Head office | United States |
| CEO | Mr. Witkowski |
| Employees | 5,600 |
| Founded | 1874 |
| Website | ir.coreandmain.com |


