Heron Therapeutics Inc Stock price
Is Heron Therapeutics Inc a Top Scorer Stock based on the Dividend, High-Growth-Investing or Leverman Strategy?
As a Free StocksGuide user, you can view scores for all 9,113 stocks worldwide.
StocksGuide Premium
StocksGuide Unlimited
Key metrics
📘 Market Capitalization
📈 What is it?
Market capitalization shows how much a company is currently worth on the stock market.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It helps classify companies by size (Large, Mid, Small Cap) and indicates their market presence and relative stability.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Large-cap companies tend to be more stable, often pay dividends, but may grow more slowly.
- Smaller firms may offer higher growth potential but come with more volatility.
- Market capitalization is a useful indicator of company size — but not a measure of whether a stock is undervalued or overvalued.
📘 Enterprise Value (EV)
📈 What is it?
Enterprise Value represents the total cost to acquire a company — including its debt and excluding its cash reserves.
🧮 How is it calculated?
(= Market Cap + Net Debt)
🏛️ Why is it important?
EV gives a more complete picture of a company's value than market cap alone and is used in key valuation ratios like EV/FCF or EV/Sales.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Enterprise Value shows the true cost of buying a company, including all financial obligations.
- It is more accurate than just looking at market cap, especially when comparing companies with different levels of debt or cash.
- Professional investors prefer EV-based multiples because they better reflect the company’s full financial footprint.
📘 Net Debt
📈 What is it?
Net Debt shows how much debt remains after subtracting a company’s available cash reserves.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It indicates how dependent a company is on borrowed money and how easily it can service its debt in the short term.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Low or negative net debt signals financial strength and flexibility.
- Companies with strong cash positions are better positioned in crises.
- High net debt increases financial risk — especially in environments with rising interest rates or economic downturns.
📘 Cash
📈 What is it?
Cash represents all liquid assets a company can access immediately — including cash, bank deposits, and short-term investments.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It reflects a company’s financial flexibility and resilience — enabling investments, buybacks, or buffer in downturns.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A strong cash position means greater room for maneuver and crisis resistance.
- Cash-rich companies can invest, pay down debt, or repurchase shares.
- But excess idle cash might indicate a lack of growth opportunities.
📘 Shares Outstanding
📈 What is it?
Shares outstanding represent the total number of a company’s shares currently held by investors — excluding treasury stock.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It’s the basis for key metrics like Earnings Per Share (EPS), Market Capitalization, or the Price/Earnings ratio (P/E).
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Fewer shares in circulation typically increase earnings per share — making each share more valuable.
- Share buybacks reduce the number of shares and boost per-share metrics.
- Issuing new shares does the opposite — diluting shareholder value and lowering per-share figures.
📘 Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E)
📈 What is it?
The P/E ratio shows how many times a company's earnings per share are reflected in its current share price — in other words, how "expensive" the stock appears relative to its profits.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
The P/E ratio is one of the most widely used valuation metrics. It helps investors assess whether a stock appears cheap or expensive compared to its earnings power.
🧮 Calculation
📊 P/E (TTM) = Based on earnings from the last 12 months (Trailing Twelve Months):🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low P/E may indicate undervaluation — or signal underlying issues.
- A high P/E may reflect strong growth expectations — or an overvalued stock.
📘 Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S)
📈 What is it?
The P/S ratio shows how much investors are paying for $1 of the company’s revenue – regardless of profitability.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
P/S is especially useful for evaluating growth companies or businesses not yet profitable. It reflects how the market values the company’s sales.
🧮 Calculation
Market Cap = $77.10m | Revenue (TTM) = $151.18m
Market Cap = $77.10m | Estimated Revenue = $151.22m
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low P/S may indicate undervaluation — or low profitability.
- A high P/S can reflect strong growth expectations — or excessive optimism.
- Especially helpful when evaluating companies where profits are low, volatile, or negative.
📘 Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales)
📈 What is it?
EV/Sales shows how much investors are paying for $1 of revenue — considering not just equity, but also debt and cash. It’s the capital structure–adjusted version of the P/S ratio.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It’s ideal for comparing companies with different levels of debt. It reflects a company's true cost relative to its revenue.
🧮 Calculation
Enterprise Value = $177.09m | Revenue (TTM) = $151.18m
Enterprise Value = $177.09m | Forward Revenue = $151.22m
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- EV/Sales allows for capital structure–neutral company comparisons.
- A lower ratio may indicate undervaluation; a higher one may signal strong growth expectations or overvaluation.
- Especially helpful when evaluating high-growth companies with low or negative earnings.
📘 Enterprise Value to Free Cash Flow (EV/FCF) | ex SBC
📈 What is it?
EV/FCF compares a company’s enterprise value with its free cash flow. The metric therefore shows the multiple of current free cash flow at which a company is valued. EV/FCF ex SBC additionally accounts for stock-based compensation (SBC). While SBC does not represent a direct cash outflow, issuing shares as compensation can dilute existing shareholders. Therefore, SBC is deducted from free cash flow in this adjusted version.
🧮 How is it calculated?
EV/FCF ex SBC = Enterprise Value ÷ (Free Cash Flow (TTM) − SBC)
🏛️ Why is it important?
EV/FCF provides a valuation based on free cash flow and therefore complements earnings-based valuation metrics such as the P/E ratio. The ex SBC version additionally accounts for the economic impact of stock-based compensation and provides a more conservative view from a shareholder perspective.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low EV/FCF means that enterprise value is low relative to current free cash flow. The reasons should always be considered in the context of the company and its industry.
- A high EV/FCF means that enterprise value is high relative to current free cash flow. This can, for example, reflect high growth expectations or temporarily weak cash generation.
- When SBC is positive and adjusted free cash flow remains positive, EV/FCF ex SBC is generally higher than the standard EV/FCF.
- The metric is particularly useful for companies with relatively stable and predictable cash flows.
- If free cash flow is negative or very low, EV/FCF has limited usefulness and should not be interpreted like a standard valuation multiple.
📘 Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B)
📈 What is it?
The P/B ratio compares a company’s market value to its book value — showing how much investors are paying for each dollar of net assets.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
P/B is commonly used for asset-heavy industries like banks or industrials. It helps assess whether a stock is trading above or below its net asset value.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A P/B below 1 may signal undervaluation — or weak profitability.
- A P/B above 1 implies the market expects future value creation (e.g., brand, IP, growth).
- Best used for companies with tangible assets and strong balance sheets.
📘 Equity Ratio
📈 What is it?
The equity ratio indicates what portion of a company’s total assets is financed by shareholders’ equity – in other words, how much it relies on its own capital.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
A high equity ratio reflects financial strength and stability, especially during downturns. It’s a key indicator of a company’s solvency and long-term risk profile.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Companies with high equity ratios are generally more resilient and less dependent on external debt.
- Low equity ratios can signal higher risk or aggressive financial strategies.
- Important: Always assess the equity ratio in combination with the return on equity (ROE). This shows not just how stable the company is – but also how efficiently it uses shareholder capital.
📘 Return on Equity (ROE)
📈 What is it?
Return on equity (ROE) shows how efficiently a company uses its shareholders’ equity to generate profit. In other words: how much net income is earned per dollar of equity.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
ROE is a core profitability metric. It helps investors understand whether a company delivers attractive returns on the capital provided by its shareholders.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high ROE indicates that the company is using its capital efficiently and profitably.
- It’s especially meaningful for capital-intensive businesses or firms with high equity bases.
- Important: A very high ROE can also result from high debt levels – always interpret it alongside the equity ratio to assess financial health.
📘 Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
📈 What is it?
ROCE measures how efficiently a company generates profits from its total capital – including both equity and interest-bearing debt.
🧮 How is it calculated?
It evaluates the return on all capital employed, regardless of how it’s financed.
🏛️ Why is it important?
ROCE is ideal for comparing companies with different financing structures. It shows how well management uses capital to create value for both shareholders and creditors.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high ROCE means the company uses its capital efficiently – regardless of whether it's funded by debt or equity.
- The higher the ROCE compared to peers, the more value the company creates with its invested capital.
- Especially relevant for capital-intensive sectors like industrials, energy, or infrastructure.
📘 Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
📈 What is it?
ROIC measures how efficiently a company generates returns from the capital invested in its core operations – regardless of whether the capital comes from equity or debt.
🧮 How is it calculated?
- NOPAT = Net Operating Profit After Taxes
- Invested Capital = Operating assets minus non-interest-bearing liabilities
🏛️ Why is it important?
ROIC is one of the most accurate indicators of capital efficiency. Unlike return on equity, it is not distorted by leverage and shows how much value is created for all capital providers.
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high ROIC shows how effectively a company uses the capital that is truly invested in its core operations.
- Unlike ROCE, ROIC focuses only on the capital that is actively used to run the business – and that requires a return (i.e. interest-bearing).
- Especially useful when comparing companies with large amounts of excess cash or non-interest-bearing liabilities – giving a more realistic picture of capital efficiency.
📘 Leverage Ratio (Debt-to-Equity)
📈 What is it?
The leverage ratio indicates how much a company relies on interest-bearing debt (such as loans and bonds) relative to its shareholders’ equity.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
This ratio helps assess a company’s financial structure and risk profile. High leverage can enhance returns – but also increases exposure to interest rate changes and financial stress.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low leverage ratio signals financial strength and independence.
- A higher ratio can improve returns in good times but increases risk during downturns or rising interest rate periods.
- 👉 Always interpret in the context of industry, capital intensity, and interest rate environment.
📘 SBC | in % Revenue
📈 What is it?
SBC (Stock-Based Compensation) refers to equity-based compensation granted by a company to its employees and executives. The percentage shows SBC relative to revenue.
🧮 How is it calculated?
SBC as % of Revenue = (SBC ÷ Revenue) × 100
🏛️ Why is it important?
Stock-based compensation is a real cost factor for shareholders. It can increase the number of shares outstanding and therefore dilute existing shareholders. The percentage of revenue shows how heavily a company relies on equity-based compensation and how significant this form of compensation is relative to the size of the business.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A lower figure is generally positive: Stock-based compensation is relatively small compared with the company's revenue.
- A high figure can indicate greater reliance on stock-based compensation and a higher potential risk of dilution. However, it is also important to consider whether the company offsets dilution through share buybacks.
- The trend over time should also be considered. A high but declining percentage presents a different picture from a persistently high or increasing percentage.
- A single-digit SBC-to-revenue ratio is not unusual among many growth-oriented and technology companies.
📘 SBC as % of FCF
📈 What is it?
SBC (Stock-Based Compensation) refers to equity-based compensation granted by a company to its employees and executives. The percentage shows SBC relative to free cash flow (FCF).
🧮 How is it calculated?
SBC as % of FCF = (SBC ÷ Free Cash Flow) × 100
🏛️ Why is it important?
Stock-based compensation is a real cost factor for shareholders. It can increase the number of shares outstanding and therefore dilute existing shareholders. The percentage of free cash flow shows how significant SBC is relative to the cash generated by the company. Since SBC is non-cash compensation, it is typically not deducted as a cash outflow when calculating FCF.
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A lower value is generally favorable. Stock-based compensation is relatively small compared with the company's cash generation.
- A high value means that SBC represents a significant portion of the company's reported free cash flow, even though SBC itself is non-cash.
- The higher the value, the more significant SBC can be as an economic cost to shareholders, particularly when it results in share dilution.
📘 SBC Growth 1Y
📈 What is it?
SBC Growth 1Y shows how much a company's stock-based compensation has changed compared to the previous year.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
SBC Growth shows whether stock-based compensation is becoming more or less significant for shareholders. If SBC increases significantly, it can lead to greater shareholder dilution over time. At the same time, SBC is a non-cash expense that reduces earnings on the income statement but is added back in the cash flow statement.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high positive value is generally negative, as rising SBC can increase the burden on shareholders, particularly through potential dilution.
- What matters is whether the development of SBC is sustainable over the long term. Some level of SBC is common among many growth and technology companies.
📘 Share Count Growth 1Y
📈 What is it?
Share Count Growth 1Y shows how much the number of shares outstanding has increased or decreased over a one-year period.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
The number of shares determines how many shares the company's earnings and assets are distributed across. If the share count decreases, existing shareholders' relative ownership increases. If it increases, existing shareholders are diluted. The metric therefore makes dilution and share buybacks directly visible.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A negative value is generally positive, as the number of shares outstanding is decreasing.
- A positive value indicates dilution of existing shareholders.
- A declining share count is not automatically positive: It also matters at what price the shares are repurchased and how the buybacks are financed.
📘 Shareholder Yield
📈 What is it?
Shareholder Yield measures how much capital a company returns to shareholders or uses to reduce debt relative to its market capitalization. It goes beyond dividend yield by also including share buybacks and debt reduction.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Dividend yield only tells part of the story. Companies can also return capital through share buybacks, while reducing debt can strengthen the balance sheet. Shareholder Yield combines all three components into one metric, giving investors a broader view of how a company uses its capital.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A higher Shareholder Yield generally indicates more capital being returned to shareholders or used to reduce debt.
- The mix matters: dividends, buybacks, and debt reduction can affect shareholders in different ways.
- Share buybacks are most beneficial when shares are repurchased at attractive valuations.
- Investors should also consider whether dividends, buybacks, and debt reduction are sustainable over time.
📘 Revenue
📈 What is it?
Revenue shows how much a company earns in total from selling its products and services – the gross income before any costs are deducted.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Revenue is one of the key figures to assess a company’s size, market position, and growth potential.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Growing revenue indicates rising demand and can be an early signal of future earnings growth.
- Comparing actual and expected revenue reveals trends in the market environment and analyst sentiment.
- Note: Strong revenue alone isn’t enough – margins and profitability matter just as much.
📘 EBITDA
📈 What is it?
EBITDA stands for “Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization.” It reflects a company’s operating profit before the effects of financing, taxes, and accounting depreciation.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
EBITDA is widely used to evaluate a company’s operating performance – especially across capital-intensive sectors or international comparisons.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high or growing EBITDA indicates strong operational profitability – independent of taxes, interest, or accounting methods.
- It’s especially useful for comparing companies across sectors or geographies.
- Important: EBITDA is not a net income figure – it excludes key costs like depreciation and interest.
📘 EBIT
📈 What is it?
EBIT stands for “Earnings Before Interest and Taxes.” It reflects a company’s operating profit after depreciation, but before interest and tax expenses.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
EBIT is a core profitability metric that shows how well the company performs in its main business operations – independent of capital structure and tax environment.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high EBIT indicates strong profitability from the company’s core business – before financial and tax effects.
- It allows better comparison between companies with different debt levels or tax structures.
- Compared to EBITDA, EBIT already accounts for depreciation and reflects capital intensity more clearly.
📘 Net Income
📈 What is it?
Net income is the company’s total profit – the amount left after all expenses, taxes, interest, and depreciation have been deducted.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Net income is the most comprehensive measure of a company’s profitability – showing how much actual profit remains after all business and financing costs.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Growing net income indicates that the company is managing all of its costs efficiently.
- It directly influences valuation metrics like P/E ratio and the company’s dividend capacity.
- Over time, net income trends reveal how resilient and profitable the business model really is.
📘 Free Cash Flow (FCF) | ex SBC
📈 What is it?
Free cash flow shows how much cash remains after a company has covered its operating and capital expenditures. FCF ex SBC additionally deducts stock-based compensation (SBC) to adjust the cash flow for the effect of non-cash SBC.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Free Cash Flow ex SBC = Operating Cash Flow − SBC − Capital Expenditures (CAPEX)
🏛️ Why is it important?
FCF reflects a company’s actual financial strength – independent of reported accounting earnings. It shows how much flexibility a company has for dividends, share buybacks, or debt reduction. FCF ex SBC also deducts stock-based compensation and shows how much cash generation remains after SBC.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- High free cash flow indicates that a company has strong financial strength – independent of reported earnings.
- It is often a solid basis for sustainable dividends and share buybacks.
- Declining FCF can be a warning sign, even if reported earnings remain stable.
📘 Revenue Growth
📈 What is it?
Revenue growth shows how much a company’s sales have changed compared to the previous year – both on a trailing basis (TTM) and based on forward projections.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Forward = (Expected revenue ÷ Revenue in prior year − 1) × 100
Forward growth is based on analyst estimates for the current fiscal year.
🏛️ Why is it important?
Rising revenue signals growing demand, business expansion, and market share gains – especially important for growth-oriented companies.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Growth is the engine of long-term value creation – especially in tech and growth sectors.
- What matters is not just current growth, but its sustainability.
- Forward projections reflect whether analysts expect continued momentum – or a slowdown.
📘 EBITDA Growth
📈 What is it?
EBITDA growth shows how much a company’s operating profit (before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) has increased or decreased compared to the previous year.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Forward = (Expected EBITDA ÷ EBITDA from prior year − 1) × 100
The forward estimate is based on analyst projections for the current fiscal year.
🏛️ Why is it important?
Growing EBITDA indicates improving operational profitability – regardless of financing or accounting effects.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Strong EBITDA growth signals operational efficiency and scalability – especially during growth phases.
- EBITDA growth can be an early indicator of margin and earnings expansion – but should be assessed alongside revenue and EBIT.
📘 EBIT Growth
📈 What is it?
EBIT growth shows how much a company’s operating profit (after depreciation, but before interest and taxes) has increased compared to the previous year.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Forward = (Expected EBIT ÷ EBIT from prior year − 1) × 100
The forward estimate is based on analyst projections for the current fiscal year.
🏛️ Why is it important?
EBIT growth is a direct indicator of a company’s business performance – taking into account capital intensity through depreciation.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Rising EBIT signals improving operating profitability – even after accounting for depreciation.
- It’s especially important for evaluating companies with significant capital expenditures.
- Combined with revenue and EBITDA growth, EBIT growth provides a well-rounded view of operational progress.
📘 Net Income Growth
📈 What is it?
Net income growth shows how much a company’s bottom-line profit has increased or decreased compared to the previous year – both on a trailing basis (TTM) and based on analyst projections.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Forward = (Expected net income ÷ Net income from prior year − 1) × 100
The forward estimate reflects analysts’ expectations for the current fiscal year.
🏛️ Why is it important?
Net income is the ultimate measure of profitability. Growing net income signals stronger efficiency, cost control, and sustainable earnings power.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Stronger net income boosts valuation, dividend potential, and investor confidence.
- If profits stall while revenue grows, it may signal margin pressure.
📘 Free Cash Flow Growth
📈 What is it?
Free cash flow (FCF) growth shows how a company’s available cash – after covering operating expenses and capital expenditures – has changed compared to the previous year.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Free cash flow reflects real financial strength. Growing FCF indicates more flexibility for dividends, share buybacks, and reinvestment.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Declining FCF may point to rising investments, increasing costs, or weaker operating performance.
- Especially for dividend investors, FCF growth is critical – since dividends are paid from actual available cash.
- A negative trend isn't always bad, but it deserves closer attention.
📘 Gross Margin
📈 What is it?
Gross margin shows how much of a company’s revenue remains after deducting the direct costs of goods sold (like materials and production). It represents the company’s “raw profit” before fixed costs, taxes, and interest.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Or simply: Gross Margin = Gross Profit ÷ Revenue × 100
🏛️ Why is it important?
Gross margin indicates how efficiently a company can produce or procure what it sells. It is a key measure of product-level profitability and pricing power.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high gross margin suggests strong pricing power and efficient production.
- Falling margins may signal rising input costs or competitive pressure.
- Compared to peers, gross margin offers insights into the quality of a business model.
📘 EBITDA Margin
📈 What is it?
The EBITDA margin shows how much of a company’s revenue remains as operating profit before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization.It reflects operating efficiency without being distorted by financing or accounting factors.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
The EBITDA margin reveals how much operating income a company generates per dollar of revenue – independent of capital structure and tax effects.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high EBITDA margin reflects strong core profitability – before accounting distortions.
- It allows for effective comparisons across companies and sectors.
- A stable or growing margin signals efficient cost control and business scalability.
📘 EBIT Margin
📈 What is it?
The EBIT margin shows what percentage of revenue remains as operating profit after depreciation but before interest and taxes.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
The EBIT margin reflects a company’s core profitability while accounting for capital intensity (e.g. machinery, infrastructure). It’s especially useful for comparing businesses with different levels of depreciation.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high EBIT margin shows that the company remains efficient even after factoring in depreciation.
- It’s especially relevant for capital-intensive industries.
- Stable or rising EBIT margins over time are a strong indicator of pricing power and business quality.
📘 Net Margin
📈 What is it?
Net margin shows how much of a company’s revenue remains as bottom-line profit after deducting all costs, interest, taxes, and depreciation.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Net margin reflects a company’s overall efficiency – across operations, financing, and taxation. It shows how much actual profit is generated from each dollar of revenue.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high net margin means the company is not only strong operationally but also manages financing and taxes efficiently.
- Peer comparisons reveal business quality and competitiveness.
- Declining margins despite revenue growth can be a red flag for rising costs or inefficiencies.
📘 Free Cash Flow Margin | ex SBC
📈 What is it?
The Free Cash Flow Margin shows how much free cash flow a company generates relative to its revenue. In simplified terms, free cash flow is calculated as operating cash flow minus capital expenditures. The Free Cash Flow Margin ex SBC additionally accounts for stock-based compensation (SBC). While SBC does not represent a direct cash outflow, issuing shares as compensation can dilute existing shareholders. Therefore, SBC is deducted from free cash flow in this adjusted metric.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Free Cash Flow Margin ex SBC = (Free Cash Flow − SBC) ÷ Revenue × 100
🏛️ Why is it important?
The Free Cash Flow Margin shows how efficiently a company converts its revenue into free cash flow. Strong free cash flow can provide financial flexibility for dividends, share buybacks, debt repayment, or further investments. The ex SBC version additionally accounts for the economic impact of stock-based compensation and therefore provides a more conservative view of cash generation from a shareholder perspective.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high Free Cash Flow Margin shows that a company converts a high proportion of its revenue into free cash flow.
- This can provide greater financial flexibility for dividends, share buybacks, debt repayment, or investments.
- The Free Cash Flow Margin ex SBC additionally accounts for potential shareholder dilution from stock-based compensation.
- The long-term trend is particularly important. Declining margins can, for example, result from higher investments, changes in working capital, or weaker operating performance.
📘 Earnings per share (EPS)
📈 What is it?
Earnings per Share (EPS) shows how much profit is attributable to a single share – and is one of the most important metrics for evaluating a company's performance.
🧮 How is it calculated?
The diluted share count reflects potential new shares that could be issued through options, convertible bonds, or other rights.
🏛️ Why is it important?
EPS is the basis for many key valuation metrics like P/E ratio, PEG ratio, or payout ratio. It enables comparisons of profitability across companies, regardless of their size.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- EPS captures per-share profitability and is especially useful for comparisons over time or with analyst estimates.
- Rising EPS may signal consistent growth or share buybacks.
- Important: Always use diluted EPS for more realistic valuations – especially in companies with stock-based compensation.
📘 Free cash flow per share (FCF per share)
📈 What is it?
Free Cash Flow per Share shows how much free cash flow a company generates per outstanding share – after investments, but before dividends or debt repayments.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Free cash flow is calculated as operating cash flow minus capital expenditures (CapEx).
🏛️ Why is it important?
FCF per Share reveals how much real cash is available per share – useful for dividends, buybacks, or reducing debt. Unlike net income, free cash flow is harder to manipulate and often seen as a more reliable metric.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- High FCF per share signals strong financial flexibility.
- It shows how much capital the company can effectively reinvest or return to shareholders.
- Particularly relevant for dividend payers and capital-efficient businesses.
📘 Short interest
📈 What is it?
Short interest indicates how many shares of a company are currently sold short – that is, borrowed and sold by investors who expect the price to decline.
🧮 How is it calculated?
It reflects the percentage of a company’s shares that are being shorted relative to the total shares available.
🏛️ Why is it important?
Short interest serves as a sentiment indicator: A high value may signal skepticism or bearish expectations – but also increases the potential for a short squeeze if prices rise unexpectedly.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Low short interest usually indicates market confidence in the company.
- High short interest can be a warning sign – or an opportunity if sentiment shifts.
- Especially relevant in volatile markets or ahead of key earnings releases.
📘 Employees
📈 What is it?
The employee count shows how many people a company employs worldwide – offering insights into its size, structure, and business model.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It helps assess operational scale, labor intensity, and cost structure. Combined with revenue and profit, it enables key metrics like revenue per employee or productivity.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high headcount can signal operational complexity – but also significant growth capacity.
- Revenue per employee is a key indicator of efficiency.
- Especially useful for comparing tech, industrial, or service-heavy companies.
📘 Revenue per employee
📈 What is it?
Revenue per employee indicates how much revenue a company generates on average per employee – a key measure of efficiency and productivity.
🧮 How is it calculated?
The employee count is typically taken from the most recent annual report.
🏛️ Why is it important?
This metric helps compare business models – especially between labor-intensive and technology-driven companies. A high value suggests automation, operational efficiency, or strong value creation per head.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high revenue per employee indicates a scalable and margin-strong business model.
- A low figure may reflect labor-intensive operations or lower value-add.
- Especially helpful when comparing tech companies to industrial or service sectors.
Heron Therapeutics Inc Stock Analysis
Analyst Opinions
7 Analysts have issued a Heron Therapeutics Inc forecast:
Analyst Opinions
7 Analysts have issued a Heron Therapeutics Inc forecast:
Heron Therapeutics Inc Events
Past Events
|
AUG
10
Q2 2026 Earnings Call
2 months ago
|
|
MAY
11
Q1 2026 Earnings Call
5 months ago
|
|
FEB
26
Q4 2025 Earnings Call
8 months ago
|
|
NOV
4
Q3 2025 Earnings Call
11 months ago
|
StocksGuide Free
Heron Therapeutics Inc — Q2 2026 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Good day and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Heron Therapeutics second quarter 2026 earnings conference call. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised today's conference is being recorded.
I would like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Melissa Jarel. Please go ahead.
Thank you, Operator, and good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us on the Heron Therapeutics conference call today to discuss the company's financial results for the second quarter of 2026. With me today from Heron are Craig Collard, Chief Executive Officer; Ira Duarte, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer; Bill Forbes, Executive Vice President, Chief Development Officer; Mark Hensley, Chief Operating Officer; and Kevin Warner, Senior Vice President, Medical Affairs Strategy and Engagement.
For those of you participating in the conference call, slides are made available via webcast and can also be accessed via the Investor Relations page of our website following the conclusion of today's call.
Before we begin, let me quickly remind you that during the course of this conference call, the company will make forward-looking statements. We caution you that any statement that is not a statement of historical fact is a forward-looking statement.
This includes remarks about the company's projections, expectations, plans, beliefs, and future performance, all of which constitute forward-looking statements for the purposes of the Safe Harbor Provision under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based on judgment and analysis as of the date of this conference call and are subject to numerous important risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements.
The risks and uncertainties associated with the forward-looking statements made in this conference call and webcast are described in the safe harbor statement in today's press release and in Heron's public periodic filings with the SEC.
Except as required by law, Heron assumes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect future events or actual outcomes and does not intend to do so. And with that, I would now like to turn the call over to Craig Collard, Chief Executive Officer of Heron.
Thanks, Melissa. Hello, everyone, and welcome to Heron Therapeutics' second quarter 2026 earnings call. Net revenue for the quarter was $37.7 million. That is growth from the first quarter, but it is below what we expected of ourselves. CINVANTI sales were up compared to Q1 in a highly competitive market, and ZYNRELEF grew 35% year-over-year, but both were slower than we anticipated.
Turning to Slide 4, let me walk through the key updates from the quarter. The acute care franchise delivered revenue growth of 44% year-over-year. ZYNRELEF grew 35%, with average daily units growing 19% year-over-year. APONVIE grew 74% year-over-year and reached 23% share of the surgical NK-1 segment, up 2 points from the first quarter. And CINVANTI came in at $21.8 million, up from $20.5 million in the first quarter. Mark will add more color in a moment to the commercial performance.
Beyond the commercial results, what I want to spend the rest of my time on today is what we have done about the quarter and how we are proceeding moving forward. First, we reset the balance sheet. As we disclosed today, we amended our credit facility with Hercules. When the decision from the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware regarding certain patents covering CINVANTI changed the outlook for the company, we went to our lender. The amendment resets our covenants through 2027 to match our new plan and reduces our principal. The terms are in the filing.
Second, we tightened our spending. After the June court decision, we paused the sales force expansion we had planned for the second half of this year, and we are holding spending tightly while the competitive picture clarifies. Our spending decisions follow what the business demonstrates, not a plan that events have overtaken.
Third, we are defending our oncology franchise. We have filed our appeal based on the June decision. A generic has not launched, but we are preparing for potential generic competition to CINVANTI. We have a defense strategy built around the clinical profile of the product, our customer relationships, and our contracting position, and we are executing it now before we needed it.
Last, we are considering strategic alternatives as we continue to execute our current plan. The company has not set a timetable for this process. There can be no assurances that it will result in any transaction, and the company does not intend to comment further on such matters unless and until it determines that additional disclosure is appropriate or required by law.
Before I turn things over to Mark, I want to recognize the entire Heron team. This has been a demanding stretch, a hard quarter, a court decision we disagree with, and a lot of change, and this team has stayed focused on patients and customers through all of it. I will now turn the call over to Mark to cover our commercial performance. Go ahead, Mark.
Thanks, Craig. Starting on Slide 6 with the overall net sales picture, total net sales of $37.7 million in the second quarter, up from $34.7 million in the first quarter. On the acute care side, $15.3 million combined. ZYNRELEF at $11.1 million, up from $10.2 million, and APONVIE at $4.2 million, up from $3.4 million.
On the oncology side, $22.3 million combined. CINVANTI at $21.8 million, and SUSTOL at $0.5 million, continuing the planned wind down. As always, ordering and channel patterns move quarter to quarter. The cleaner read on adoption is average daily units and ordering accounts, which is what I will focus on.
Turning to Slide 7, there are 2 charts on this slide. Average daily units on the left, ordering accounts on the right. Both continue their upward trend. Net sales were $11.1 million, up 9% from the first quarter and up 35% from a year ago. The number I would anchor on is demand.
Average daily units grew 19% year-over-year. And lastly, I would add IGNITE 2.0 is active across 3,150 accounts, up from 2,260 in IGNITE 1.0. This remains a site-by-site, case-by-case adoption curve. Unit growth was real this quarter, but it was below the rate we planned, and the work now is converting that access into cases and protocols in the accounts we are already in.
Moving to APONVIE. The same two views for APONVIE, and both charts show the steady climb. Net sales were approximately $4.2 million, up 74% from a year ago, and up 26% from the first quarter. Share in the NK-1 segment reached 23%, up 2 points sequentially. Average daily units grew 59% year-over-year, and ordering accounts in June were up 42% from June of last year. P&T approvals now stand at 1,810 accounts, representing 6.7 medium- to high-risk procedures annually.
Demand through the quarter was steady. Now turning to CINVANTI. Average daily units on the left have held a consistent level of utilization over the past two years, and ordering accounts on the right, 1,241 in June, are in line with a 12-month average of about 1,200. Net sales were $21.8 million, up from $20.5 million in the first quarter, and down about 10% from a year ago. That year-over-year decline is the branded competition we have discussed on prior calls. The more recent picture is one of stability. Utilization has held steady, and share in June was 25%, in line with its 12-month average.
The REIGNITE work on formulary position and our contracting relationships are the levers we control, and they are the foundation of how we would compete against any future entrant.
Lastly, SUSTOL continues its planned wind down as we've discussed on prior calls. To wrap up the commercial section, ZYNRELEF average daily units grew 19% year-over-year. APONVIE reached 23% share of the NK-1 segment. CINVANTI declined year-over-year against branded competition, but has held steady in recent months. And the defense of contracting and formulary work is in place.
That is the demand picture as it stands. I will now turn the call over to Ira to cover our financials. Go ahead, Ira.
Thank you, Mark. Craig has addressed the quarter directly. What is within our control is how we manage the business in response, and disciplined management of our balance sheet and our spending is what is important moving forward.
Our full results are shown on this slide. I will cover the highlights. Net revenues for the quarter were $37.7 million compared to $34.7 million in the first quarter of 2026 and $37.2 million in the comparable prior year quarter, with gross margin coming in at 69.3%.
R&D expense was $2.7 million, and SG&A expense was $25.4 million, bringing total operating expenses to $28.1 million, including stock-based compensation and depreciation. Our operating loss was $2 million and net loss was $5.5 million, compared to a net loss of $2.4 million for the comparable prior year quarter.
Adjusted EBITDA was $3.2 million, up from $2.2 million in the comparable prior year quarter. We ended the quarter with $42.7 million in cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments.
Following the June court decision, we negotiated an amendment with our lender that waives the June 30 covenants and resets the schedule to match our operating plan. As part of that amendment, we agree to a principal reduction that comes in 2 steps. $13.5 million paid at the amendment's execution plus associated fees and a potentially further $4 million reduction scheduled on or before September 15 for a total potential principal reduction of $17.5 million. Reflecting those payments, our pro forma cash is approximately $28.5 million and approximately $24.3 million after the September payment.
The amendment sets monthly minimum revenue and EBITDA covenants through December 2027, along with a minimum cash covenant, and the agreement is filed with our 10-Q. We are withdrawing our full year 2026 guidance of $173 million to $183 million in net product sales and $10 million to $20 million in adjusted EBITDA. Three things make an annual number unreliable right now, and none of them is about a single quarter.
First, the June court decision. The timing and terms of potential generic entry against CINVANTI, our largest product, are not events we can forecast, and any annual number would embed an assumption we are not in a position to make.
Second, the actions we took ourselves after that decision. We paused the sales force expansion that our plan had assumed for the second half and we tightened spending. Our prior guidance was built on that investment plan, and it is not the plan we are currently executing on.
Third, as Craig mentioned, we are considering strategic alternatives, which our amended credit agreement also reflects. Any one of these items on its own would make an annual number unreliable. This is a forecasting decision, not a statement about the underlying business. We would make the same decision regardless of the quarter's results.
In place of guidance, we will report our cash position, our spending, and our covenant compliance every quarter. With that, we will open the call up for questions.
[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Brandon Folkes with H.C. Wainwright. Your line is open.
2. Question Answer
Maybe just three from me. Can you elaborate on your confidence in meeting the updated debt covenants should a CINVANTI generic come to market? Maybe just staying on CINVANTI. If and when a generic does launch, any reason the erosion should not look like the SUSTOL erosion curve? And then maybe just on ZYNRELEF, right?
So you called out, it was below expectations. So can you just help us think about sort of what is driving this below-expectation performance recently? Do surgeons just not sort of warm to the detail? Are they just very sticky on the alternatives they use? Just any driving color in terms of, you know, what is the hurdle there in ZYNRELEF? And potentially, I mean, what can a strategic partner who's well-capitalized do differently? Thank you.
Yes. Hi, Brandon. Let me take first on the Hercules amended agreement. The way we looked at CINVANTI, again, we took a very conservative approach with how we looked at the generic launch. In reality, there's a number of factors here that are at play.
First of all, we don't know when the product does come to market. We know that there's some manufacturing challenges with this product as we go through them ourselves. It's a sterile process. It's an emulsion. So all of that takes time to scale in order to meet market demand. And keep in mind, we're moving about 750,000 to 800,000 units a year.
And so I don't think anyone wants to launch in that scale. Secondly, there's the reimbursement piece. You know, do they fall under our J-code or do they fall in their own J-code? And again, that can determine share as well. And it could change sort of the market dynamic.
So there's a number of moving pieces, but the way we viewed this was in a really conservative kind of earlier launch scenario with Hercules on the covenant.
So again, I think we're very covered there because I do think this may take a bit longer than maybe we modeled out. And so I think from that standpoint, our lenders felt very comfortable.
I'll turn it over to Mark on the second piece about ZYNRELEF and kind of what's going on in the quarter.
Yes, and thanks for the question, Brandon. You know, on ZYNRELEF, the product grew 9% quarter-over-quarter.
You know, as you're aware, in Q1, the market itself was down. And so we expected to recover from that, you know, quite strongly in Q2.
We didn't quite get to our expectations in the second quarter, and certainly that's on us to rectify. I wouldn't point to anything necessarily about the product.
Certainly the market itself is a little bit slow this time of year, and as you can look back at, you know, Slide 7 in the earnings deck, you see a really nice run up in the back half of the year for the market and for ZYNRELEF and other products in that market.
So we still expect that to occur, but certainly Q2 is on us from an execution perspective, and we'll work to fix that in the third quarter. Okay.
Thank you. One moment for our next question. Our next question comes from Serge Belanger with Needham.
I guess first one for Craig on potential generics CINVANTI. I know there's still a lack of clarity on a potential launch here, but I believe you have a couple settlement agreements around CINVANTI with some other players.
Curious what the impact would be for those potential launches on those players if Azurity already does launch a generic product.
And then secondly, regarding ZYNRELEF, maybe for Mark, just curious what you're seeing in terms of surgical volumes and just the overall volume of procedures over the second quarter. I believe your competitor reported some macro volatility that impacted healthcare spending. Just curious if you're seeing kind of the same thing. Thanks.
Yes, sir. Regarding CINVANTI, whether it launches or doesn't launch, it will have no impact at all on the settlement. So that should not change.
And then as far as ZYNRELEF goes, kind of macro impacts, look, I think we still continue to make progress on P&T wins throughout the quarter. So maybe we weren't as impacted as much by that situation, or at least I didn't hear that much about it in particular. But really, it's just about time of pull through, you know, and we were a little bit slower on a few things in the quarter than we expected and certainly, you know, hope to see those continue to pull through in the back half of the year.
Thank you. And I'm not showing any further questions at this time. I'll turn the call back over to Craig for any further remarks.
No, thanks everyone for joining the call this quarter and we'll talk to you next quarter. Thank you.
Thank you, ladies and gentlemen. This concludes today's presentation. We thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect and have a wonderful day.
Heron Therapeutics Inc — Q1 2026 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Heron Therapeutics Q1 2026 Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your first speaker today, Melissa Jarel, Vice President of Legal. You may begin.
Thank you, operator, and hello, everyone. Thank you for joining us on the Heron Therapeutics conference call today to discuss the company's financial results for the first quarter 2026. With me today from Heron are Craig Collard, Chief Executive Officer; Ira Duarte, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Bill Forbes, Executive Vice President and Chief Development Officer; Mark Hensley, Chief Operating Officer; and Kevin Warner, Senior Vice President, Medical Affairs, Strategy and Engagement.
For those of you participating via conference call, slides are made available via webcast and can also be accessed via the Investor Relations page of our website following the conclusion of today's call. Before we begin, let me quickly remind you that during the course of this conference call, the company will make forward-looking statements. We caution you that any statement that is not a statement of historical fact is a forward-looking statement. This includes remarks about the company's projections, expectations, plans, beliefs and future performance, all of which constitute forward-looking statements for the purposes of the safe harbor provisions under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based on judgment and analysis as of the date of this conference call and are subject to numerous important risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. The risks and uncertainties associated with the forward-looking statements made in this conference call and webcast are described in the safe harbor statement in today's press release and in Heron's public periodic filings with the SEC. Except as required by law, Heron assumes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect future events or actual outcomes and does not intend to do so. And with that, I would now like to turn the call over to Craig Collard, Chief Executive Officer of Heron.
Thanks, Melissa. Hello, everyone, and welcome to Heron Therapeutics First Quarter 2026 Earnings Call. Today, we're thrilled to share our financial results and provide commercial updates on our business. I'd like to begin by highlighting several key accomplishments. Coming off a strong fourth quarter of 2025, we entered the new year with tremendous momentum. As expected, the first quarter of any year historically brings seasonal headwinds driven by co-pay resets and insurance adjustments, and this year was no exception.
However, 2026 presented additional challenges for us, 2 weeks of severe weather early in the quarter that significantly compounded the typical seasonal softness, making January our most difficult month since I joined the company. The impact of the weather was felt most acutely in elective surgeries, which are highly sensitive to extreme conditions and saw a sharp decline during that period. Importantly, this was not an isolated experience. Multiple publicly traded pharmaceutical and surgical companies have reported the same weather-driven disruption across January and February. The breadth of this industry-wide impact validates that the headwinds we faced were external and temporary in nature, not reflective of any underlying weakness in our business or markets. Despite this, the team responded well.
February brought a clear upward trend and March closed strongly with over $15 million in net sales, demonstrating the underlying strength and resilience of the business. While the weather undoubtedly weighed on our Q1 results, it has not shaken our confidence in the year ahead. We fully expect the remaining deferred elective procedures to be rescheduled throughout the remainder of 2026, creating a meaningful tailwind as we progress through the year. This aligns with our historical pattern where Q3 and Q4 consistently represent our highest volume quarters, and we anticipate 2026 will be no different.
Turning to our Acute Care portfolio. We delivered revenue growth of 32% compared to the same period last year, with ZYNRELEF growing 27% and APONVIE growing over 50%, respectively. Two structural drivers are worth highlighting. Our IGNITE program, the incentive program with our orthopedic distribution partners has been very successful, and we're continuing it into 2026 as a key growth driver for ZYNRELEF. With APONVIE, we are beginning to realize the commercial benefits of its inclusion in the fifth consensus guidelines for the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting, a meaningful clinical endorsement that we believe will serve as a sustained tailwind for adoption. We will provide additional detail later in the presentation on the strategic and commercial implications of that inclusion.
Turning to our sales force expansion. Implementation is on track for the third quarter with the recruitment already underway. We view this as a significant catalyst for growth across our portfolio, and we will walk through the strategy in more detail in the presentation.
Moving on to oncology. We continue to deliver solid performance with CINVANTI despite increased competitive pressure. For the quarter, CINVANTI maintained exit market share of 25% in the NK1 category. And although net sales reflected normal quarter-to-quarter timing, CINVANTI itself has remained resilient, demonstrating strong customer loyalty and continued demand even in this very competitive landscape. We have a number of new accounts coming on board in Q2 that we anticipate could add upwards of $10 million in net revenue on an annualized basis. We will cover this in greater detail as part of the commercial performance update. Before I turn things over to Mark to cover our commercial performance, I want to take a moment again to recognize the entire Heron team for their performance this quarter. We fight every day in a very competitive environment, and this quarter offered other challenges that we had no control over, yet our team continues to persevere and move forward. I will now turn the call over to Mark to cover our commercial performance. Go ahead, Mark.
Thanks, Craig. Moving to product performance, starting with our overall net sales picture for the quarter. This chart shows quarterly net revenue for each product across the last 4 quarters. Total net sales of $34.7 million in Q1. On the Acute Care side, $13.6 million combined: ZYNRELEF at $10.2 million, APONVIE at $3.4 million; on the oncology side, $21.1 million combined: CINVANTI at $20.5 million, SUSTOL at $0.6 million, reflecting the planned wind down we previously discussed.
You can see the sequential dynamics on each product. A few of these reflect ordering and channel patterns rather than changes in underlying demand. The cleaner read on adoption across all 4 products is the demand unit and ordering account data, which I'll cover in detail as we go. But before we get into individual product performance, there's an important strategic point on the next slide.
This slide shows our net selling price per unit across the 4 products over the last 4 quarters. The Y-axis values aren't displayed. What matters is the directional trend within each product. Starting with ZYNRELEF, net selling price has been steadily increasing across the period. Our pricing posture is holding and the J-code and NOPAIN environment are supporting that trajectory.
For APONVIE, net price has been stable. That's what we'd expect for a product still in its growth phase, where our focus is volume penetration rather than per unit price extraction. On CINVANTI, you'll notice the Q4 bar is slightly lower than the surrounding quarters with Q1 returning to a level consistent with our strategy. That Q4 dynamic was temporary and Q1 reflected normal channel ordering patterns following the Q4 activity. The more important point, our underlying pricing strategy on CINVANTI is intact and disciplined and SUSTOL declining in line with planned wind down. The headline message of this slide is straightforward. Across our active commercial products, we are maintaining pricing discipline and not chasing volume through price concessions. That's a deliberate strategic choice. It protects the long-term economics of the franchise and supports the durable recurring demand we're building.
Now on to ZYNRELEF. You can see the 2 charts on the slide, average daily units on the left, ordering accounts on the right. Both have continued to trend up through Q1. The number I'd anchor on is demand unit growth of 22% year-over-year. The broader local anesthetic market was down sequentially in Q1. In that environment, ZYNRELEF outgrew the market on a year-over-year basis and held share sequentially. The underlying franchise is performing.
On reimbursement, the permanent J-code, J0668 has been live since October. Combined with the NOPAIN Act framework that took effect at the start of 2025, the reimbursement environment for ZYNRELEF is the cleanest it's been since launch. That framework streamlines reimbursement across approximately 110 million covered lives on the commercial side. Two quarters in, reimbursement conversations are smoother and the friction at the billing office level continues to come down. Looking at the Q2 through Q4 drivers on the right side of the slide, IGNITE has been extended throughout 2026 and expanded with IGNITE 2.0, which I'll cover on the next 2 slides. We're also seeing expansion of users within accounts, meaning more surgeons within each adopting institution moving on to ZYNRELEF as part of their protocol. And we'll be expanding our ZYNRELEF sales team in Q3 2026, targeted geographies where all 3 foundational drivers are fully in place: formulary access, the IGNITE program, and payer coverage. That expansion sits alongside the aprepitant team expansion, I'll cover on the APONVIE slide, reflecting our confidence in the trajectory of both franchises. On the longer-term side, our prefilled syringe presentation is in late-stage development. Bill will cover that in more detail later in the presentation.
Moving on to Slide 10. Here is the data behind IGNITE 1.0. The chart shows ZYNRELEF unit volume across our IGNITE targeted accounts, pre-IGNITE versus post-IGNITE. We went from approximately 9,000 units in the last pre-IGNITE quarter of last year to over 19,000 units by Q4 of last year. That's 111% growth within these targeted accounts in just two quarters of the program. This is the data that gave us the conviction to extend IGNITE through 2026 and expand it further.
On Slide 11, you can see what IGNITE 2.0 looks like. IGNITE 1.0 in the second half of 2025 covered 2,261 accounts. IGNITE 2.0, which is now live for full year '26, covers 3,109 accounts. That's a 38% increase, adding 848 additional accounts to the program. More accounts in the program means more concentrated distributor focus on the institutions we've identified as most likely to adopt and deepen ZYNRELEF use. The structural drivers that produced 111% unit growth in IGNITE 1.0 are now applied to a meaningfully larger base of accounts in 2026. I will now turn it over to Bill to cover the prefilled syringe.
Thank you, Mark. This slide highlights the strong momentum in our Acute Care franchise and the continued advancement of the ZYNRELEF prefilled syringe program. We have seen consistent and accelerating adoption across our device preparation platforms as we transition from the vented vial spike or VVS to the significantly improved vile access needle or VAN. This evolution has been well received and reflects clear progress in ease of use and workflow efficiency.
At the same time, market demand continues to shift toward ready-to-use systems, which are emerging as an important growth driver as hospitals prioritize efficiency, safety and streamlined operating room workflows. Independent third-party forecasts reinforce the durability of this trend with prefilled syringe adoption expected to scale meaningfully over time. From a program standpoint, the ZYNRELEF PFS is fully funded and on track. It was designed to align with contemporary health system expectations, including both ASHP and Joint Commission guidance, while improving operating room workflow, reducing preparation steps and lowering the risk of medication errors and contamination. The development program is well advanced. Registration batches have been manufactured and placed on stability, and we remain on track to generate 12-month stability data in the first quarter of 2027. Mark, I'll turn it back to you.
Thanks, Bill. Now to APONVIE. There are two charts on this slide, average daily units on the left, ordering accounts on the right. Both showed continued steady upward trajectory through Q1.
On the Q1 metrics, APONVIE demand units grew 68% year-over-year. Average daily units grew 70% over Q1 of last year. We exited Q1 with 371 ordering accounts in March. That's an all-time high for the product and up 67% versus March of last year. And APONVIE is now P&T approved in 1,903 accounts, representing 5.8 million medium to high-risk procedures annually. The last number defines the size of the addressable opportunity that APONVIE has now been formally cleared into. On the growth drivers ahead, APONVIE's permanent product-specific J-code became active April 1, having a permanent dedicated billing code in place removes a layer of reimbursement complexity for the product. We'll be expanding our dedicated aprepitant sales force in Q3 2026. That team currently covers both APONVIE and CINVANTI and the expansion adds capacity to support both products.
And lastly, APONVIE has been prominently included in the fifth consensus guidelines for the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. That's a meaningful clinical catalyst. I'll hand it over to Kevin to walk through the guidelines and what they mean for the product.
Thanks, Mark. We wanted to provide a brief overview to help the Street understand the broader clinical and economic significance of the recently published fifth consensus guidelines for the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. These guidelines represent an important shift in perioperative care, moving from reactive management of PONV toward a far more proactive patient-centered prevention strategy. From a medical affairs perspective, guideline updates are highly important because they often serve as the foundation for durable institutional change. Historically, adoption occurs over time through provider education, EMR order sets, anesthesia workflows, perioperative pathways and treatment algorithms. Once integrated into institutional protocols, these practices tend to become highly durable standards of care. Importantly, the updated guidelines substantially elevated the role of NK1 antagonist within multimodal prophylaxis strategies. Aprepitant-based therapies, including APONVIE, received an A1 evidence rating for prevention of PONV in adults, reflecting the highest level of evidence supporting efficacy and safety.
APONVIE is specifically named within the guidelines as the first and only FDA-approved IV push NK1 antagonist for the prevention of PONV in adults. We believe this distinction is clinically meaningful because it combines efficacy, workflow efficiency and ease of perioperative implementation in a way that supports both providers and patients. Another key evolution within the guidelines is the broader recommendation for multimodal prophylaxis. While patient and procedure-specific risk stratification remains central, the updated guidance recognizes that the benefit of prophylaxis often outweighs the risk of undertreatment. As a result, many institutions are expected to adopt a more liberal prophylaxis strategy across broader patient populations.
The guidelines specifically recommend that patients with greater than two risk factors, representing roughly half of the surgical population received 3 to 4 prophylactic interventions. These medium and high-risk patients often require highly effective antiemetic strategies without adding recovery-limiting adverse effects.
We believe APONVIE is uniquely positioned in this setting. Its efficacy profile, combined with a differentiated safety profile that does not overlap with many commonly used antiemetics supports use in patients where prevention matters most. Importantly, APONVIE provides antiemetic protection without contributing to sedation or negatively impacting postoperative recovery pathways, which is increasingly important in enhanced recovery protocols and ambulatory surgery.
One of the most significant additions to the Fifth Edition guidelines was the expanded focus on post-discharge nausea and vomiting, or PDNV. The guidelines emphasize that PONV is not simply an acute PACU complication. For many patients, symptoms occur after discharge when clinical support resources are less available. The guidelines cite data showing approximately 37% of patients may experience PDNV with implications for dehydration, wound complications, unplanned health care utilization and potential readmissions. As outpatient surgery volumes continue to expand and same-day discharge becomes increasingly common, these downstream complications become even more relevant in value-based care models.
Importantly, the guidelines now recommend that patients at risk for PDNV receive prophylactic long-acting antiemetics prior to discharge. We believe APONVIE aligns well with this recommendation given its 48-hour duration of action and ability to provide extended receptor coverage during the vulnerable post-discharge period. The guidelines also reinforce several important differentiators associated with APONVIE and MK1 antagonist therapy more broadly. APONVIE is administered as a simple 30-second IV push with rapid onset and greater than or equal to 97% receptor occupancy within 5 minutes, integrating efficiently into standard anesthesia workflows. This becomes particularly relevant for providers who may not have had adequate preoperative time or oral administration or who are caring for patients with limitations to oral therapies, including those with gastroparesis, GLP-1 utilization, diabetes-related GI dysfunction or altered gastric emptying.
The strength of evidence supporting aprepitant-based therapy was also highlighted throughout the guidelines multiple randomized trials demonstrated aprepitant to be comparable or superior to ondansetron for prevention of PONV. Meta-analysis showed significant reductions in PONV risk when used alone or within multimodal regimens. And a large Cochrane systemic review evaluating nearly 100,000 patients ranked aprepitant as the single most effective antiemetic.
Importantly, the updated guidelines frame PONV prevention not simply as a patient comfort initiative, but as a meaningful clinical quality and operational issue. Poorly controlled PONV contributes to extended PACU stays, rescue medication use, delayed discharge, dehydration, wound stress, aspiration concerns and readmissions. In many high-risk procedures, including abdominal bariatric, ENT, ophthalmology and other belt-up surgeries, preventing vomiting is viewed as critically important to protecting surgical outcomes and patient safety.
Appropriate prophylaxis also supports perioperative operational efficiency by reducing nursing burden, minimizing recovery delays, improving throughput and enhancing both patient and staff satisfaction. The guidelines additionally highlighted the pharmacoeconomic value of effective prophylaxis strategies. One metric discussed was number needed to treat or NNT. For aprepitant combined with dexamethasone, the reported NNT was 3.8, meaning approximately four patients treated prevents one additional case of PONV. Compared with many commonly used antiemetics, this represents a highly favorable value proposition. From a health system perspective, this becomes clinically and economically meaningful very quickly.
A single episode of PONV has been estimated to cost approximately $1,000 when considering rescue therapy, nursing utilization, prolonged PACU time and delayed discharge. When viewed in that context, preventing complications with an intervention costing approximately $60 per dose becomes highly rational and understandable for providers and institutions alike, particularly as value-based care models increasingly focus on patient satisfaction, throughput, readmissions, recovery quality and total episode of care costs. Ultimately, we believe the fifth consensus guidelines reinforce several important macro trends shaping the perioperative landscape, including greater use of multimodal prophylaxis, increasing recognition of post-discharge nausea vomiting, continued migration toward outpatient surgery, demand for workflow efficiency and the growing need for safe, effective nonsedating long-acting therapies that support enhanced recovery pathways, which we believe APONVIE is uniquely positioned to address. I will now turn the call back to Mark to discuss our oncology supportive care franchise.
Thanks, Kevin. Turning to oncology supportive care. There are 2 charts on this slide, average daily units on the left, ordering accounts on the right. CINVANTI's average daily units have remained resilient, sustaining a consistent trend in utilization throughout 2024 and into 2026. That's a meaningful durability marker for a product in its mature commercial phase in a category that has faced steady competitive pressure.
On ordering accounts, you can see the two layers on the right chart. The blue line shows existing accounts running at approximately 1,100 every month, which speaks to the stickiness of the customer base. The purple line shows new and returning accounts averaging about 59 per month in Q1 of '26. In March specifically, 1,188 accounts ordered CINVANTI. That number was in line with the 12-month average of approximately 1,200 accounts.
On market share, CINVANTI ended Q1 with 25% exit share in March of 2026. That was also in line with the 12-month average. The stability is the takeaway. We are holding our position in a competitive category. Looking at growth drivers for the rest of 2026, Greg referenced a number of new accounts coming online this year. Those new formulary wins are due to our REIGNITE program. It's focused on CINVANTI access to major teaching hospitals, where we have already secured formulary wins and the near-term pipeline represents approximately $10 million in new opportunity. And as I mentioned earlier, our dedicated aprepitant sales force expansion in the third quarter of 2026 will support CINVANTI as well as APONVIE. CINVANTI will be promoted in the second position by that team.
Now to the broader category dynamics. On the next slide, the chart shows the broader NK1 category for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting over the last 12 months. The stacked bars show total category units broken out by competitor product. The percentages at the top of each bar show month-over-month volatility in the overall category, ranging from down 19% in some months to up 21% in others. The line running across the chart is CINVANTI's market share within that category. Despite all the category level volatility, CINVANTI's share has been remarkably stable. The 12-month average is 25%. March 2026 closed at 25%. That share stability in a category where the underlying volume is highly variable month-to-month is the durability marker for this franchise. To wrap up the commercial section, ZYNRELEF demand grew 22% year-over-year with IGNITE 2.0 expanding our targeted account base by 38% for 2026. APONVIE demand grew 68%. Ordering accounts hit an all-time high and the fifth consensus guidelines have positioned the product as the evidence-graded standard for PONV prophylaxis. CINVANTI held a stable 25% market share in a volatile category with reignite building approximately $10 million of near-term pipeline. Across all of it, our pricing discipline is intact. Our structural drivers are in place, and our commercial leverage continues to expand with both our ZYNRELEF team and our dedicated aprepitant team set to expand in Q3. The drivers we put in motion in '25 are working as designed, and we have line of sight to deliver on the full year framework we laid out in February. With that, I'll now turn it over to Ira.
Thank you, Mark. As Craig noted, our financial results this quarter came in modestly below plan. That said, while winter storms are outside of our control, how we manage our business in response to them is not. And disciplined cost management remains a hallmark of this team that our shareholders have come to rely on. Net revenues for the quarter were $34.7 million, with gross margin coming in at 69%, below our typical low to mid-70s percent range. As we have discussed in prior calls, we have a secondary supplier for CINVANTI and carried a contractual obligation to produce a certain inventory quantities over the past year. That secondary product is manufactured in smaller batch sizes at roughly 3x the cost per batch of our primary supplier. This inventory will work its way through our system over the next two quarters, after which we will return exclusively to our primary supplier. Once those contractual obligations are fulfilled, we expect gross margins to normalize back to the mid-70% range.
Adjusted EBITDA was negative $727,000 for the quarter, reflecting the combined impact of the storm-related revenue softness and the temporary gross margin pressure from our secondary CINVANTI supplier. Both factors are temporary, and we expect adjusted EBITDA to return to positive territory as we move through 2026. Looking ahead, the recovery is already underway. As noted earlier on the call, March net revenues returned to over $15 million, a strong signal for the second quarter and one that reinforces our confidence in achieving our full year targets. To reaffirm our 2026 guidance, we are maintaining net product sales of $173 million to $183 million and adjusted EBITDA of $10 million to $20 million, reflecting continued profitability alongside meaningful commercial expansion. With that, we are happy to open the call for questions.
[Operator Instructions] Our first question will be coming from the line of Brandon Folkes of H.C. Wainwright.
2. Question Answer
Maybe just a few from me. Firstly, on your guidance, can you just talk about some of the pushes and pulls on ZYNRELEF that you assume to meet the overall company level revenue guidance? Do you assume ZYNRELEF taking market share? And then maybe secondly, apologies if I missed this. Can you just give me some details on the Baxter settlement, sort of what that allows, what that sort of keeps exclusivity? Yes, that's it for me. Maybe one more, just you talked about friction. So can you just talk about how you meaningfully change the adoption curve across ZYNRELEF and APONVIE. And on ZYNRELEF, it sounds like there's friction in sort of the office to decide to use ZYNRELEF. How do you change that ahead of the prefilled syringe and eliminate the friction you're seeing today so that the prefilled syringe can sort of maximize the value that it can bring?
Brandon, thank you for the questions. I'll start with the Baxter settlement, and then I'll turn it to Mark. Look, based on the terms of the settlement, we really can't go into the details of that other than to say that the dates and everything that have been published. But outside of that, we're just forbidden from saying anything on that. So I'll turn it over to Mark to talk about the ZYNRELEF questions that you asked.
Yes, it's a great question. I think, kind of, 1 and 3 are, kind of, part and parcel of the same. But in terms of our confidence, there are several factors that we're looking at. First, we talked about the weather and the elective procedures being pushed out of January. Obviously, we believe those will be rescheduled throughout the year. And so certainly, that will be a nice tailwind for us. As it relates to both ZYNRELEF and APONVIE really, we're really focused on the expansion of the sales force in the kind of midyear. We certainly think that will help our share of voice and really kind of build upon the foundation that we've already built.
And then IGNITE 2.0, you see the slides and kind of what that delivered in the third and fourth quarter of last year. And so the expansion of that by 38% in 2026, we believe, will be a really nice tailwind for us as we go forward.
And then on the friction piece, I think for us, we don't really see accounts that don't want to use ZYNRELEF. Really, the hardest part for us is getting to a meaningful enough number of them to have that kind of quarter-over-quarter growth that we would want to see with the product, right? And so a lot of that is the reason why we're expanding the team in the, kind of, midyear. And certainly, that share of voice will continue to grow. And so -- because we're continuing to see market share grow within our targeted accounts, certainly within the accounts where we're aligned, not only at Heron, but within our IGNITE program. And so we just want to continue to expand upon that across the country.
And our next question will be coming from the line of Serge Belanger of Needham & Company.
This is John on for Serge today. First, if I could just follow up on ZYNRELEF again with regard to the 1Q winter storm headwinds. Just curious if you could quantify the impact with regard to surgical volumes for the quarter there. And then second, on the implementation of NOPAIN. Obviously, it's been online for over a year now. Curious what impacts you're seeing on commercial coverage and how this has changed over time and what you might be expecting for '26? And then if I could just squeeze one more in on the CrossLink partnership. It seems like you're adding on to the initial IGNITE program, targeting more accounts here in '26. Curious if this is just throwing more muscle at the program to increase the accounts you're getting into and what else we might expect from this?
Great. Thank you for the questions. On surgical volume, our data shows this kind of high single-digit decline from the fourth quarter. So a pretty meaningful impact larger than we've seen in prior years. We think that's part weather-related, part a record Q4 from a surgical volume perspective and maybe some of our surgical partners just taking a deep breath in the quarter. But certainly, we expect that to significantly improve. And obviously, some of those surgeries that were lost, we would imagine that those would be rescheduled. To your second question on commercial coverage, we -- obviously, NOPAIN is a great factor for ZYNRELEF and certainly removes the word I've been using is friction, at least on the Medicare side, on the government payer side. And since its implementation, we've seen more and more commercial payers begin to add ZYNRELEF outside of the surgical bundles, reimbursing outside of that bundle. We reported the number on the call at 110 million lives is the estimate that we have on the commercial side. And so kind of largely across the United States, very well covered for ZYNRELEF. There are pockets where we see ZYNRELEF still bundled, but certainly, we have the ability to go in and have those conversations at the payer level. And for the most part, they're willing to listen and make some changes for our patients.
And then as it relates to CrossLink, we allow them to select the accounts. And so by doing so, the natural selection gave us an expansion in that program, again, at 38%. And so the alignment between Heron and CrossLink now is almost 90% in terms of our focus. That's the highest it's ever been, significantly higher than the back half of 2025. And so what that really means is that we have a Heron employee in the account. We have a CrossLink employee in that account. We have really good payer coverage in those accounts. That's why they were selected. And so those three pieces of the puzzle have shown us that, that's where we really have good success and are able to move ZYNRELEF forward. And so that gives us a lot of confidence for 2026.
[Operator Instructions]
I would now like to turn the conference back to Craig Collard for closing remarks.
Thank you, operator. I just want to thank everyone for joining the call today, and we look forward to speaking to you all next quarter.
And this concludes today's program. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.
Heron Therapeutics Inc — Q4 2025 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Heron Therapeutics Q4 2025 Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your first speaker today, Melissa Jarel, Executive Director of Legal. Please go ahead.
Thank you, operator, and hello, everyone. Thank you for joining us on the Heron Therapeutics conference call today to discuss the company's financial results for the fourth quarter and year ended December 31, 2025. With me today from Heron are Craig Collard, Chief Executive Officer; Ira Duarte, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Bill Forbes, Executive Vice President and Chief Development Officer; Mark Hensley, Chief Operating Officer; and Kevin Warner, Senior Vice President, Medical Affairs, Strategy and Engagement.
For those of you participating via conference call, slides are made available via webcast and can also be accessed via the Investor Relations page of our website following the conclusion of today's call. Before we begin, let me quickly remind you that during the course of this conference call, the company will make forward-looking statements. We caution you that any statement that is not a statement of historical fact is a forward-looking statement. This includes remarks about the company's projections, expectations, plans, beliefs and future performance, all of which constitute forward-looking statements for the purposes of the safe harbor provision under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
These statements are based on judgment and analysis as of the date of this conference call and are subject to numerous important risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. The risks and uncertainties associated with the forward-looking statements made in this conference call and webcast are described in the safe harbor statement in today's press release and in Heron's public periodic filings with the SEC. Except as required by law, Heron assumes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect future events or actual outcomes and does not intend to do so.
And with that, I would now like to turn the call over to Craig Collard, Chief Executive Officer of Heron.
Thanks, Melissa. Hello, everyone, and welcome to the Heron Therapeutics Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2025 Earnings Call. Today, we're thrilled to share our financial results and provide commercial updates on our business. I'd like to begin by highlighting several key accomplishments from the quarter and the full year 2025. One of the most important was the successful completion of our financing. This issue had been an overhang on the company for some time and eliminating it represents a meaningful derisking event. With a solid capital structure now in place, management can concentrate fully on commercial execution, product expansion and delivering sustained growth.
Beyond the successful financing, team Heron delivered strong operational and financial performance in the fourth quarter and for the full year 2025. For the full year, we generated approximately $155 million in total net revenues and delivered adjusted EBITDA of $14.7 million, exceeding our previously communicated guidance range of $9 million to $13 million. Gross margin for this year was approximately 73%, reflecting continued improvements in cost discipline and product mix.
Turning to our Acute Care portfolio. We executed several strategic initiatives in 2025 that strengthened our commercial foundation and drove meaningful acceleration heading into year-end. These included the launch of the CrossLink IGNITE program, an incentive-based initiative designed to enhance distributor engagement, the introduction of the vial access needle or VAN, and the implementation of a new J-Code for ZYNRELEF, which improves reimbursement clarity and supports broader hospital adoption.
For APONVIE, we established a dedicated sales team known as the IBM group focused exclusively on APONVIE and CINVANTI in the hospital setting. Importantly, APONVIE was also included in the newly released Fifth Consensus Guidelines for the management of PONV, further validating its clinical value and bolstering long-term utilization. Throughout 2025, we communicated our expectation for an inflection in Acute Care performance in late Q3 or early Q4. I'm pleased to report that this materialized ahead of our internal expectations.
In Q4, ZYNRELEF delivered 48% net revenue growth compared to Q4 of 2024, while APONVIE grew 97% over the same period. Altogether, our Acute Care franchise increased more than 57% year-over-year in the quarter. These results confirm that the strategic actions we implemented in 2025 are driving sustained momentum across the portfolio. With stronger commercial infrastructure, improved reimbursement pathways and rising clinical adoption, we believe we are well positioned to continue this trajectory as we move into 2026.
As we continue to see a positive shift in our Acute Care product growth, our strategy beginning in 2026 and beyond is to accelerate the expansion of our commercial team in key markets across the country. These priority geographies offer strong success indicators, robust market access, favorable reimbursement dynamics, established cross-link relationships and market characteristics similar to our highest performing territories. By concentrating our investments in areas where foundational success factors already exist, we can scale more efficiently and maximize near-term commercial productivity.
This approach is designed to drive meaningful growth in top line revenue. In light of these opportunities, we are increasing our commercial investments, which may temporarily moderate EBITDA growth. We believe these investments are warranted given the compelling long-term return profile. Expanding coverage in markets where we already have traction allows us to pull forward revenue, accelerate market penetration and unlock a much larger growth trajectory in the out years. For investors, the key takeaway is that disciplined targeted commercial deployment now positions the company for outsized revenue acceleration, enhanced operating leverage and a substantially stronger enterprise value as we capture a greater share of high-opportunity Acute Care markets.
On the development front, we continue to advance the prefilled syringe or PFS presentation for ZYNRELEF. Registration batches were placed on stability in Q4 of last year, and we will need to complete 12 months of stability testing before we can file. Assuming a standard 4- to 6-month regulatory review, we anticipate a potential approval in mid- to late 2027.
Moving on to Oncology. We continue to deliver solid performance with CINVANTI despite increased competitive pressure. For the full year 2025, the Oncology franchise generated just over $105 million in net revenue, representing a modest 7.8% decline compared to 2024. Importantly, the majority of this decline is attributable to SUSTOL as we continue the planned wind down of that product throughout 2026. CINVANTI itself has remained resilient, demonstrating strong customer loyalty and continued demand even in a more competitive landscape.
Before I turn things over to Mark to cover our commercial performance, I want to take a moment to recognize the entire Heron team. The progress we made in 2025 was only possible because of the hard work, commitment and resilience demonstrated across the organization. From our commercial teams driving execution in the field to our manufacturing, R&D, regulatory and corporate functions supporting every aspect of our strategy, your dedication is reflected in the results we delivered this year.
Investors often hear about strategy, portfolio decisions and financial performance, but behind all of that is a group of people who show up every day with focus, urgency and a belief in the mission of Heron. I'm incredibly proud of what we accomplished together in 2025, and I'm confident that with this team, we are well positioned to carry that momentum into 2026 and beyond. To everyone at Heron, thank you for your continued effort, your commitment to patients and your unwavering drive to deliver results. Go ahead, Mark.
Thanks, Craig. I'll start with Acute Care, where we finished the year with clear momentum, and then I'll close with Oncology Supportive Care. Moving now to Slide 6. Acute Care net sales were $16.3 million in the fourth quarter, up from $12.3 million in the third quarter, an increase of about 33%. That quarter-over-quarter increase was driven primarily by ZYNRELEF. ZYNRELEF net sales increased to $12.5 million from $9.3 million in the third quarter. APONVIE net sales also increased to $3.8 million from $3 million.
On a year-over-year basis, ZYNRELEF net revenue grew 48% and APONVIE grew 97%. Overall, we're encouraged by the exit rate and the momentum heading into 2026. While we can see normal quarter-to-quarter variability early in the year, we remain focused on execution and expect performance to build as the year progresses.
Now let's talk about what's behind ZYNRELEF's quarter-over-quarter momentum. A big driver was sharper distributor execution. We launched the CrossLink IGNITE program in July of 2025, and we saw the benefit of that increased focus in the fourth quarter. Based on that performance, we decided to continue the program into 2026 and expanded the number of target accounts CrossLink is focused on. In parallel, we reduced friction for hospitals and ASCs. We completed the rollout of the vial access needle, which improves preparation and handling, and we have a permanent J-Code, J0668, which helps streamline reimbursement.
More broadly, we continue to see reimbursement becoming more straightforward as hospitals and ASCs gain familiarity with coding and the evolving post-op pain reimbursement environment, including the NOPAIN Act. And looking ahead, we continue development of the proposed prefilled syringe presentation. If successful, we are targeting FDA approval in mid- to late 2027. Overall, the story is consistent, more accounts adopting, fewer barriers to continued use and a more repeatable process that supports continued growth over time.
Next is APONVIE, where we're building a similar pattern of expanding adoption in hospitals. Demand units grew 101% year-over-year. Ordering accounts continue to expand as well. Operationally, we launched the dedicated APONVIE sales team on July 1, focused on high potential hospital accounts. This quarter, we are also announcing a permanent product-specific J-Code, J8502, which supports reimbursement clarity. And importantly, APONVIE is now included in the newly released Fifth Consensus Guidelines for the management of PONV.
The way we think about it is straightforward. Guideline inclusion and permanent coding reduce friction for hospitals. They also support education around multimodal prophylaxis and longer-acting coverage. We expect that to support continued adoption over time. Finally, I'll close with Oncology Supportive Care, which remains an important foundation for the company. Oncology Supportive Care net sales were $24.2 million in the quarter. Year-over-year, Oncology was lower in the quarter, largely reflecting the ongoing decline in SUSTOL. CINVANTI remains the anchor of the franchise. And for CINVANTI, we are focused on driving hospital demand while managing expected pricing dynamics on the clinic side. And APONVIE and CINVANTI increasingly benefit from the same hospital relationships.
So as we deepen anesthesia and pharmacy engagement, we often see broader franchise pull-through over time. The overall point is that oncology continues to provide a stable revenue base even as we manage expected pricing and competitive dynamics. To wrap up, we exited 2025 with clear momentum in Acute Care. ZYNRELEF drove the quarter-over-quarter increase, supported by tighter execution, workflow simplification, distributor alignment through the CrossLink IGNITE program and reimbursement clarity.
APONVIE continued to expand hospital adoption, and we believe permanent coding and new guideline inclusion support continued progress over time. Oncology Supportive Care remains a stable base as we manage pricing and competitive dynamics. As we look into 2026, our focus is to keep scaling what's working. With the playbook now in place, we plan to begin adding field capacity midyear, targeted to priority geographies where we already see strong access, reimbursement and distributor traction.
With that, I'll turn it over to Ira now to walk through the financials.
Thank you, Mark. Our financial performance in 2025 underscores the meaningful progress Heron continues to make in transforming its commercial trajectory while maintaining strong financial discipline. Total net product sales for 2025 reached $154.9 million, an increase over 2024, driven primarily by the exceptional performance of our lead product, ZYNRELEF, which delivered 48% year-over-year revenue growth in the fourth quarter alone.
Even more importantly, we continue to shift our product mix towards our higher-growth assets while maintaining strong and consistent gross margins. This acceleration strengthen our confidence in the underlying demand trends and the expanding adoption curve across our Acute Care franchise. At the same time, we achieved this growth while maintaining EBITDA profitability, delivering full year adjusted EBITDA of $14.7 million, more than doubling the prior year's performance and beating full year 2025 guidance. This marks an important milestone. Heron is demonstrating the ability to grow revenue at a meaningful rate without sacrificing financial discipline.
As we move into 2026, we view this as a pivotal year. The commercial inflection we've began to see in Q4 2025 is continuing to build, and we intend to lean into that momentum. Our strategy is to remain EBITDA positive in 2026 while making targeted commercial investments that position ZYNRELEF and the broader portfolio for even stronger growth in the years ahead. These investments may temper near-term EBITDA expansion, but they are deliberate and designed to accelerate our path towards sustained revenue growth and free cash flow generation in 2027.
Importantly, last year's refinancing has eliminated the capital structure overhang that previously constrained the business and has provided Heron with the financial flexibility needed to execute this next phase of growth. With a healthy balance sheet and expanding commercial footprint and strong product level momentum, we are entering 2026 with clarity, confidence and a strategic plan that positions the company for long-term value creation. Our 2026 guidance reflects this confidence, net product sales of $173 million to $183 million and adjusted EBITDA of $10 million to $20 million, demonstrating continued profitability through a year of commercial expansions.
And now we would like to open the call for any questions.
[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Serge Belanger from Needham.
2. Question Answer
Regarding the new guidance for 2026, can you just maybe highlight your expectations for the CINV franchise, which I guess now is mostly almost 95% or so CINVANTI? And then regarding the NOPAIN Act, should we still expect that as a tailwind for ZYNRELEF? I noticed that I don't think it was even mentioned on the slides of growth drivers, but is this still something that could help the franchise going forward?
Thanks, Serge. Regarding the CINV franchise, yes, we continue to think that we're going to -- we'll grow in unit volume. Again, with the IBM team now out promoting that as well, we should get some volume growth on the hospital side. But at the same time, we're going to get some price erosion. So -- but sales should stay relatively flat throughout the year.
Regarding the NOPAIN Act, I'll turn it over to Mark Hensley.
Yes. So certainly, I think it's a great question. And we believe the NOPAIN Act will continue to be certainly very beneficial to us. I think most of 2025 was spent educating providers on the NOPAIN Act. So certainly, we believe that to be a strong tailwind as we go forward. That, combined with the permanent J-Code for ZYNRELEF, certainly will remove friction for our institutions.
Our next question comes from the line of Brandon Folkes from H.C. Wainwright.
Congrats on all the progress. Maybe just on the VAN to start, can you just tell us where you are in terms of sort of P&T committees in terms of the rollout in the VAN? Is that where you'd like it to be for 2026 and it's really just a sort of sales detail that's driving growth this year? Or should we think about sort of a sales detail as well as access within the hospital or institution as a tailwind there? And then maybe staying on that topic, any learnings from the VAN rollout that may change or sort of may tweak the prefilled syringe potential launch? Or should we think of the prefilled syringe rollout is very similar to the VAN commercial rollout?
Thank you for the question. Our growth strategy for this year is 2 parts really. The first part is where our Heron employees are overlapping with CrossLink, where we have the proper resources in our primary targets. And that's going deeper into hospitals, right? So many of our accounts, we only have a few providers that are using ZYNRELEF, but we have formulary access in those accounts and the ability to spread go deeper and wider within them. And so you'll see us continue to do that. Certainly, the VAN has been a big part of removing -- the word is friction that I use, but kind of challenges on the preparation side. That's largely been eliminated.
And then beyond those accounts, CrossLink is a much larger organization than us and has other targets beyond the Heron employees. And so those are other accounts that we continue to focus on and grow as well. From the -- on the rollout of the VAN, that actually went remarkably well. I think the transition was largely -- there was largely no issues as we moved into that. It was simply kind of winding down the prior supply of the VVS and then rolling into the VAN. And so there's probably not much we would change as we moved into the prefilled syringe launch in terms of strategically how we roll it out. It's just managing inventory on both products as we get closer so that we can move quickly when prefilled syringe is approved and ready.
Our next question comes from the line of Carl Byrnes by Northland Capital Markets.
Congratulations on the progress. Yes, I just want to talk a little bit about the Slayback litigation with respect to CINVANTI. If I'm not mistaken, this is the same U.S. District Court of Delaware and the same judge, William Bryson, that ruled in the Fresenius case. And I also believe that it looks like it's the same statutory framework in terms of 505(b)(2) Hatch-Waxman and Orange Book patents along with formulation range, excipient ratios and pH parameters and whatnot. So what are your thoughts with respect to resolution and time frame resolution with respect to this litigation?
Carl, this is Melissa Jarel. Thanks for the question. So we're really confident with the case that we made at trial. We finished briefing earlier this month, and it is with Judge Bryson. We await a deeper oral argument, but we expect a decision before the 30-month stay.
Excellent. Perfect. Very helpful. And then a follow-up, switching back to the NOPAIN Act. Can you talk a little -- maybe a little bit more about what the company may be doing or what others in the industry are doing in terms of creating awareness given where awareness is relative to the significance of the opioid crisis?
Yes, Carl, thanks for the question. It's interesting. One of the things I think we worked -- we did not anticipate is that as NOPAIN kind of rolled out, we thought that it would be fairly simplistic and everybody to be aware and obviously taking what would be otherwise a cost, right, in a surgical bundle type of scenario to actually something where they actually make money. And so there's incentive there. And so -- but what we've learned is as we've gone through this, some of the coding, just the awareness of that, it's just gone a little bit slower. I think it's now happening much faster, but we were a little bit surprised by that. So we've actually -- we're expanding some of our team that handle that so we can answer questions and help with some of that as well. But that was a bit of a surprise. Mark can kind of chime in on some things specifically we're doing that are creating more awareness and helping us on that side.
Yes. And I think kind of to your kind of second part of your question on the industry, it's not just us focused on the NOPAIN and education. Obviously, you know that. There are several other large companies that have invested interest in making sure that there's awareness and understanding of how the reimbursement works. It isn't complicated. It's relatively simple. It's just -- it's a lot of -- there are a lot of players here that have to kind of understand it and seek that reimbursement.
And so it's more just an awareness issue. But certainly, where we're getting business where we're focused on the targeted, they're aware of the NOPAIN Act and understanding that reimbursement. And we're beginning to see more and more commercial plans also follow suit, which I think early on was some of the kind of lag in adoption, whereas as we turn into the new year, we're starting to see a lot more kind of alignment between commercial and CMS on NOPAIN.
Excellent. That's very helpful as well. And then just one real final quick question, and apologies if this is somewhat redundant. But with the inclusion of the Fifth Consensus Guidelines with respect to APONVIE, what's a realistic time frame where you think that takes hold and has a material effect in terms of the APONVIE growth trajectory?
Yes. I mean we were certainly very excited to see what the new guidelines had to say. And certainly, we're confident that they will be a significant tailwind for APONVIE. The guidelines are certainly a good educational tool for us, especially as you think about when APONVIE gets taken to P&T for potential approval. Those guidelines are what pharmacy will likely reference in many cases.
And so prior to that, we had good clinical data. There's certainly a lot behind IV aprepitant and its use in the setting. But the guidelines are robust enough that we believe they'll have a significant impact. Time line to that is probably back half of the year. The cycle of kind of P&T approvals and additions is typically a 6-month cycle. And so I wouldn't expect it to be impacting much today. But as we move and progress through the year, we do believe it will have a significant impact.
This is Kevin Warner. I'll just add a little bit of color there from Mark's comments in regards to the consensus guidelines. So guidelines really change the paradigm, if you will, is what is accepted in the institutions and what we take a look at. They bring a lot of credibility and validity to the information and the data. And so it goes a long way in changing clinical decision tools, order sets, the protocols and driving that long-term adoption.
So right now, when the guidelines are initially released, obviously, you're going to create awareness, education around the clinical impact of PONV and how we should be supporting these patients in the acute phase and the extended phase. But as people adopt it, it will be slow at first to get what I call soft adoption with individual providers recognizing the information, recognizing best practices, but then you get the full implementation. So with the credibility of a guideline, the consensus statement, the level of evidence, the quality of evidence within the guidelines, it brings it to all these P&T tables as a necessity for the best patient outcomes. And so as they go through that, implementing it into order sets protocols so that all high-risk patients receive appropriate therapy, that really changes the trajectory and you get the sustainable long-term adoption.
Specifically for APONVIE within the guidelines, we were very happy with the guidelines and how it laid out the NK1 antagonist class really highlighted their long durable efficacy throughout that entire phase of the post-op recovery for the patients, the rapid onset with the IV push of APONVIE and the clinical efficacy of the NK1 class with a great safety profile.
So the guidelines are going to go a long ways as far as bringing credibility when we walk into an institution to educate them on best practices for patients, but it's not just product-driven then. This is a consensus statement from 25 societies endorsing this information. So a great driver to the future. And like Mark said, it's probably 6 to 9 months until we roll it out into these order sets and these protocols that really change the trajectory and sustained growth.
This does now conclude the Q&A portion of our conference. I would like to now hand it back to Craig Collard, CEO, for closing remarks. The floor is yours.
Thank you, operator. Thanks, everyone, for joining us on the call today, and we look forward to speaking to everybody next quarter. Thank you.
And thank you for your participation in today's conference. This does conclude the program. You may now disconnect.
Heron Therapeutics Inc — Q4 2025 Earnings Call
Heron Therapeutics Inc — Q3 2025 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Heron Therapeutics Q3 2025 Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your first speaker today, Melissa Jarel, Executive Director of Legal. Please go ahead.
Thank you, operator, and hello, everyone. Thank you for joining us on the Heron Therapeutics conference call today to discuss the company's financial results for the quarter ended September 30, 2025. With me today from Heron are Craig Collard, Chief Executive Officer; Ira Duarte, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Bill Forbes, Executive Vice President, Chief Development Officer; Mark Hensley, Chief Operating Officer; and Kevin Warner, Senior Vice President, Medical Affairs, Strategy and Engagement.
For those of you participating via conference call, slides are made available via webcast and can also be accessed via the Investor Relations page of our website following the conclusion of today's call.
Before we begin, let me quickly remind you that during the course of this conference call, the company will make forward-looking statements. We caution you that any statement that is not a statement of historical fact is a forward-looking statement. This includes remarks about the company's projections, expectations, plans, beliefs and future performance, all of which constitute forward-looking statements for the purposes of the safe harbor provision under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
These statements are based on judgment and analysis as of the date of this conference call and are subject to numerous important risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. The risks and uncertainties associated with the forward-looking statements made in this conference call and webcast are described in the safe harbor statement in today's press release and in Heron's public periodic filings with the SEC. Except as required by law, Heron assumes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect future events or actual outcomes and does not intend to do so. And with that, I would now like to turn the call over to Craig Collard, Chief Executive Officer of Heron.
Thanks, Melissa. Hello, everyone, and welcome to Heron Therapeutics Third Quarter 2025 Earnings Call. Today, we're thrilled to share our third quarter results and provide insight into how product sales are trending. I'd like to begin by highlighting several key accomplishments from the quarter. One of the most significant milestones was the successful completion of our financing. This has been an overhang on the company since I joined, and we're glad to have it behind us.
With this resolved, management can now fully focus on commercial execution and product growth. Beyond the successful financing, team Heron delivered strong operational and financial performance in the third quarter. We generated total net revenues of $38.2 million for the quarter and $114.3 million year-to-date. This performance resulted in adjusted EBITDA of $1.5 million for the quarter and $9.5 million year-to-date. Our gross margin was 68.8%, which is slightly down from previous quarters, primarily due to a onetime write-off of SUSTOL polymer inventory.
SUSTOL has been trending downward over the past several months due to increased market competition, and we expect this trend to continue for the foreseeable future. CINVANTI, on the other hand, continues to exceed our expectations. We've maintained a conservative outlook this year, anticipating a potential slight decline in CINVANTI performance as we move into Q3 and Q4. So far, that decline has not materialized. Despite ongoing competitive pressure that has historically impacted our average selling price, we're pleased that net sales are remaining fairly consistent. We believe this positive trend will continue through Q4 and into next year.
Turning to our acute care portfolio, we implemented several new initiatives in Q3, including the CrossLink Ignite program, an incentive-based initiative to improve distributor engagement, the launch of the 200-milligram vial access needle or VAN and the creation of the IBM team, a dedicated sales force focused on APONVIE only. All of these initiatives were rolled out at different times during the quarter and are beginning to have a meaningful impact. That's why we've consistently stated our belief that the acute products will begin to inflect more prominently as we move into late Q3 and Q4 of 2025.
ZYNRELEF net sales grew 49% in Q3 2025 as compared to Q3 2024, and APONVIE net sales grew 173% in that same time period. More importantly, we're finally seeing real momentum in the acute care. While quarterly net revenues and unit demand were solid, weekly unit demand from late September through October has been the highest we've ever seen, clearly indicating a possible trend break. Mark will provide more detail on this in his prepared remarks.
Lastly, our J-code for ZYNRELEF went into effect on October 1. This is a significant win for Heron and for the providers who rely on ZYNRELEF in their practices. The J-code will streamline reimbursement and reduce administrative burden, especially as the NOPAIN Act continues to gain traction. We believe this change will improve access and coverage across both government and commercial payers, ultimately supporting broader adoption and better patient outcomes. Also, our prefilled syringe continues to advance with a time line to possible approval in late 2027. Bill Forbes, our Head of Development, will address any questions regarding PFS and other development initiatives in the Q&A.
This quarter has been both busy and successful for Heron. With increasing demand for ZYNRELEF, APONVIE and even CINVANTI, we're extremely excited about the trajectory of the business moving forward. I'd now like to turn the call over to Mark Hensley, our Chief Operating Officer. Go ahead, Mark.
Thanks, Craig. In acute care, ZYNRELEF kept its momentum in the third quarter. This is a site-by-site, case-by-case adoption curve. Access enables OR-proved converts, protocols make it stick. We focused on removing friction and tightening execution. The VAN made prep in the OR easier, the Ignite program kept distributors focused on accounts we can win. Our education and medical support teams help standardize technique and support protocol adoption.
And as of October 1, ZYNRELEF has a permanent product-specific J-code, which makes billing conversations clearer. Stepping back, the theme is friction removal and focus. Those same disciplines translated to both APONVIE and CINVANTI as well. In oncology supportive care, CINVANTI remains a steady anchor. As APONVIE expands and deepens our relationships with anesthesia and pharmacy, we see CINVANTI ordering rise in those hospitals.
Let me show you how this progress shows up in the revenue numbers on Slide 6. For our acute care franchise, net sales were $12.3 million in the third quarter, up from $10.7 million in the second quarter. ZYNRELEF net sales were $9.3 million. That is a 49% growth year-over-year versus $6.2 million in the third quarter of last year and up from $8.2 million in the second quarter. The drivers are consistent, the VAN, the Ignite program focusing distributors on winnable accounts, support from our education and medical support teams and now permanent J-code clarity.
APONVIE net sales were $3 million. That is 173% growth year-over-year versus $1.1 million last year and up from $2.5 million in the second quarter. Third quarter APONVIE growth occurred before the dedicated team was fully active. The team finished training in October and entered the field in early Q4 to support momentum.
Now let me show how this demand shows up in ZYNRELEF operating metrics on Slide 7. Our installed base continues to expand as sites move from first case to protocolized use. Average daily units increased from 882 in the third quarter last year to 1,127 in the third quarter this year, an increase of about 28%. Ordering accounts rose from 705 to 833 over the same period. This comes from friction removal and focus, the VAN, Ignite program, our education and support teams and permanent J-code clarity streamlining reimbursement.
You will also see October plotted on the line, significantly above September. It is a preliminary single month and not a proxy for the fourth quarter. We will stay disciplined and let the quarter play out. With that context, let's turn to Slide 8 and APONVIE. APONVIE's trajectory is strong. Demand units grew 142% year-over-year. Average daily units increased from 418 to 998 and ordering accounts increased from 299 to 405. We launched the dedicated APONVIE team on July 1, 6 representatives focused on high-potential hospitals. The team completed full training in October, so Q3 reflects partial deployment. Full activation supports momentum going forward.
In addition, the 2025 PONV prophylaxis consensus guidelines are expected to be published in Q4. APONVIE is anticipated to be part of the guidelines, which should significantly increase awareness of its availability and clinical profile. We look forward to aligning our education and disseminating the information with our recently expanded field sales and medical teams.
Now turning to the oncology care franchise on Slide 9. Oncology franchise net sales were $25.9 million in the third quarter. CINVANTI net sales were approximately $24 million, up about 6% year-over-year and stable sequentially. As APONVIE broadens anesthesia and pharmacy relationships, we are beginning to see CINVANTI pull-through in those same institutions. SUSTOL net sales were $1.9 million, down about 32% year-over-year. We plan to wind down commercialization over the next 12 months while we evaluate potential product updates with a possible late 2027 reintroduction subject to development and regulatory progress.
We will continue to support customers and manage the transition responsibly. To wrap up, we are seeing structural progress. The VAN, the Ignite program, clinical education and permanent J-code clarity are turning ZYNRELEF first cases into durable protocols. APONVIE's hospital curve continues to strengthen, supported by a fully trained and strategically aligned team positioned ahead of the imminent release of the updated 2025 PONV prophylaxis consensus guidelines. CINVANTI remains a stable anchor and as APONVIE expands hospital relationships, we believe CINVANTI will benefit. October stepped up for ZYNRELEF, but it is a preliminary single month. We will stay disciplined and let the quarter play out. Thanks, and I'll now turn it over to Ira.
Thanks, Mark. Our product gross profit for the 3 months ended September 30, 2025, was $26.3 million or 68.8%, which decreased from 71.2% for the same period in 2024. This decrease is due to an increase of $1.4 million of inventory reserves and write-offs recorded and an increase of $1.3 million in the cost of units sold, primarily due to supplier mix.
For the 9 months ended September 30, 2025, our product gross profit was $84.1 million or 73.6%, which increased from 72.5% for the same period in 2024. This increase is due to an increase in units sold and a lower cost per unit due to the supplier mix. SG&A expenses for the 3 months ended September 30, 2025, was $26.9 million compared to $23.3 million for the same period in 2024. The increase is primarily due to higher personnel and related expenses due to new hires and increased generalized marketing costs. SG&A expense for the 9 months ended September 30, 2025, was $78 million compared to $77.3 million for the same period in 2024.
The increase is primarily due to increased marketing costs related to ZYNRELEF, offset by a decrease in personnel and related costs due to terminations and a onetime stock compensation expense in 2024, which did not reoccur in 2025 and a decrease in legal expenses due to timing of litigation.
Research and development expenses were $3.5 million for the 3 months ended September 30, 2025, compared to $4.5 million for the comparable period in 2024. The decrease is primarily due to timing of expenses. Research and development expenses were $8.7 million for the 9 months ended September 30, 2025, compared to $13.5 million for the comparable period in 2024. The decrease is due to a decrease in personnel and related expenses due to terminations and a decrease in write-offs of property and equipment and other assets.
For the 3 months ended September 30, 2025, we incurred a net loss of $17.5 million compared to a net loss of $4.8 million for the same period in 2024. The increase in net loss is primarily due to the $11.3 million loss on debt extinguishment recognized in the quarter. For the 9 months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, we incurred a net loss of $17.2 million. The net loss for the 9 months ended September 30, 2025, included a onetime charge of $11.3 million related to our recent debt extinguishment. Cash and short-term investments at September 30, 2025, was $55.5 million.
As a result of the debt and equity transactions completed in the 3 months ended September 30, 2025, $13.1 million was added to cash and short-term investments. If we had exclude depreciation, stock-based compensation and inventory reserves and write-offs, our adjusted EBITDA results would have been a positive $1.5 million operating income for the 3 months ended September 30, 2025, compared to a loss of $400,000 for the same period in 2024. For the 9 months ended September 30, 2025, our adjusted EBITDA is $9.5 million operating income compared to a loss of $700,000 for the same period in 2024. We are reaffirming our previously given guidance for net revenue of $153 million to $163 million and adjusted EBITDA of $9 million to $13 million. And now we'd like to open the call for any questions.
[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Carl Byrnes from Northland Capital Markets.
2. Question Answer
Congratulations on the quarter. Just turning back to the slide with respect to ZYNRELEF in the first few weeks of October, it looks like you're pushing 18% in terms of increase. And that's on a month-over-month basis. Is that correct?
Yes, Carl, that's -- it's roughly correct. Yes, it's 17%, 18% right in there.
Excellent. Fantastic. And then a financial question. If we look at gross profit margin and back out the onetime stocking charge, which I think is around $2.2 million, you end up with approximately an adjusted gross profit margin, which would be around 74.5%. Does that sound correct?
That is correct, Carl.
Yes, that's accurate.
Which is in line what we've been for the last few quarters.
Okay. And then one further adjustment, which is the extinguishment of debt. What would the net interest income line be backing that out? Would that be somewhere in the $2.1 million vicinity? Or what number should we use there?
Going forward, yes, probably about $2.5 million would be going forward.
Yes. Okay. So $2.1 million for the quarter, but sort of adjusted for the quarter period...
For it was a full quarter, yes.
$2.5 million plus. Got it. Congrats again.
Our next question comes from Brandon Folkes from H.C. Wainwright.
Congratulations on the quarter. Maybe just from me, understanding it's very early days on the internal sales team. Can you just talk about though how you're viewing those on ZYNRELEF and APONVIE, and how are you thinking about potentially adding to those teams in 2026 or sort of the measure of success to potentially add to those teams in 2026? And then any additional investments you're thinking on the commercial side behind the 2 products in 2026?
Thanks for the question, Brandon. This is Mark Hensley. I'll start, and then we'll let Craig kind of finish it up. So internally, we're very pleased with the kind of structural changes we made at the beginning of Q3. Just as a reminder, we now have a dedicated ZYNRELEF team, a dedicated APONVIE team. That APONVIE team is also beginning to do some work with CINVANTI. And so we think there's a lot of synergy there on both sides. And so the increased focus, we believe, has -- is a partial impact on the results we're seeing in the quarter and certainly as we go forward into next year. In addition to that, we have better alignment with our distributor partners. And so certainly, we think all of those things being put together will result in increased sales as we go forward.
Yes. Brandon, I would sort of add to that. As we think about the product going forward or the products going forward, I think we've been pretty consistent in saying when we see sort of pockets in the country take off when we have, let's call it, conducive events like access into an account, we have good cross-link participation, and we have certainly personnel in that area. Once we see that type of success, we would like to obviously mimic that where we can. So I think going forward, we continue to look for those pockets, and we're beginning -- as the data suggests, we're beginning to see that.
And so we're in the process of going through our budgeting process for the year. And I think we'll be looking at where we can add in specific pockets and again, staying within profitability and so forth. But I think you're going to see more to come on that because, again, we're beginning to see a little bit of a different trend. And so if we can expand that, we would certainly like to do that.
Fantastic. And maybe just one follow-up from me. Just on ZYNRELEF, granted the demand curves look really, really good, I appreciate you sharing those. Just given the VAN came online pretty significantly in the quarter, any inventory stocking benefit in the revenue -- in the reported revenue line in 3Q on ZYNRELEF?
We didn't see -- we had that kind of similar bump when we launched the 400 VAN. Because the 200 VAN is really only about 35% of the total sales, there was a minimal, let's say, bump, I guess, but not to the degree that we saw with the 400. So the inventory remained relatively stable compared to prior quarters.
Congrats on the quarter.
Our next question comes from Serge Belanger from Needham.
First question regarding the NOPAIN Act, can you just give us an update on its implementation and what you're seeing from commercial plans, whether they are following in the footsteps of Medicare? And then secondly, on the oncology care franchise, maybe just provide a little bit more color on your long-term outlook for that franchise. It sounds like you expect SUSTOL to remain under pressure for the foreseeable future. And then on CINVANTI, do you expect competitive pressures to come back despite the ones that didn't materialize in the third or fourth quarter?
Yes. Serge, I'll take the CINVANTI question, then I'll pass the other over to Kevin on the NOPAIN Act. But again, we've been saying all year long and even in my prepared remarks about CINVANTI, we felt that with the competition out there that we could see a little bit of a dip in Q3 and Q4. We have yet to see that. We've been fairly consistent in being able to keep accounts and that type of thing.
But to your point, there are -- it is a very competitive space, and we will continue to have pressure. And we could lose an account from time to time or we could be forced to take our price down to keep an account. So I mean that's just sort of the market we're in. We're going to continue to sort of look at this pretty conservatively. What I can say on the upside, though, with the IBM team that we have, we're beginning to promote CINVANTI a bit more from a rep standpoint within hospital accounts. And again, we're thinking that will have or could have a positive impact.
So again, still facing the same competition, but the fact that we have a little bit of a larger voice out there, we've actually -- we had an account we won about 3 weeks ago that was fairly significant. So again, if we can keep doing that, we think we can keep things fairly stable as we move forward. So we'll continue to update quarterly, but I think our outlook remains fairly consistent as with things we've said before.
Serge, it's Kevin Warner. So in regards to the NOPAIN Act and the impact we're seeing out in the field, it's definitely starting to build momentum. As we said previously, as expected, it would take 6, 9 months and be tail half of the year once providers and systems got educated on the fact that you could reimburse outside the bundle, and it's not typical as we know. So we're seeing education happen across all segments from some of our competitors, obviously, other companies that are included in the NOPAIN Act. They're standing at platform presentations like at ASA and delivering the message out there.
So we're continuing to educate around it, provide the systems in place and educational materials of how to actually bill separately. Commercial payers, to your point on that question, we are seeing some momentum there also. We believe it would take them time to reassess and do a rearview take on it and see what's happening with implementation. But you have providers like Aetna and Cigna that are providing separate reimbursement, and it varies state by state with individual commercial plans that we see out there.
Overall, as an estimate, we see about 75% of all ZYNRELEF indicated procedures, especially our target procedures, have some form of coverage, whether it's be a Medicare or a commercial plan. We have a few other things from the economic perspective that are tailwinds coming into 2025 for us when you look at the teams model by CMS, which is a value-based care model. So you're looking at things like patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction. So do you feel pain? Do you have PONV? That's going to be a significant tailwind.
Also the dissolution of the inpatient-only list specifically about 285 orthopedic procedures are coming off that inpatient-only list. So that will make them outpatient eligible procedures now and thus reimbursable under things like the NOPAIN Act. So a lot of value and impact is coming to our patients and really changing the model to a value-based care, looking for these advances in our health care system, long-acting advances like ZYNRELEF and APONVIE that can help facilitate this transition as we're moving our phases of care.
Yes, Serge, just to maybe address the second part of your question regarding SUSTOL, similar scenario as we faced with CINVANTI, although it's just been a little bit more competitive on that side. And again, we have fewer accounts. And so what we've seen over the last few years, we've had a continual decline and a -- continual decline in -- on our ASP. And so what we've decided to do is wind this product down over the next -- into next year.
And again, our plan is to look at possibly improving the delivery of that product, whether that be a lighter gauge needle or what have you. But we would like to bring that out possibly late '27 back into '28 as a relaunch product. And again, there's things we can do there from our selling price and that type of thing that would possibly bring this product back to market. And so we'll talk more about that as we move forward and ideas that we have. But the plan now is to wind this down as we move to really to the end of next year.
Our next question comes from Sierra Dong from Jefferies.
This is [indiscernible] on for Clara. Congrats on the quarter. So my question is about the ZYNRELEF prefilled syringe program. So you said if successful, it's expected to be approved in 2027. And based on your feedback from physicians on VAN and how do you expect the prefilled syringe program to help on the franchise on the long-term? And how can we think of the momentum there?
Thank you for your question. This is Bill Forbes. I'll just give a little bit of an update on this. We've recently just manufactured our registration batches and with that have initiated our stability program. As you know, every new product has to undergo at least 1 year of real-time stability. So we've got that clock ticking. So we're glad we've crossed that milestone, and that's why we're looking -- obviously, once we've completed that stability program, we'll go ahead and file and it will be approved, hopefully, in 2027.
The impact, I think, is one, as you can see from the VAN, we've had a bit of an uptick. And I think as far as simplifying and speeding the application and use of ZYNRELEF, the VAN has been a big step forward. But the prefilled syringe takes it to another level. Obviously, in that -- in this scenario, we're just going to go ahead and open up the prefilled syringe packaging and place it in the surgeon's hands so that they can -- it can go ahead and install the product. So I think when it comes to receiving the product, it simplifies things even to a much greater extent and obviously, will speed, I believe, the conversion of accounts into use of ZYNRELEF. I don't know if Mark has any other comments on it.
No, I think that's good.
Yes. I would just add, I think Bill is spot on it. When you think about simplicity, we still have the scenario where when we go into onboard an account, there is a training even though the VAN has improved dramatically and being able to draw the product out of the vial. And so if you think about really being able to simplify your product and now you go in and you open a tray and you dump the product in the sterile field and basically, it's ready to go, it just takes one step out of the process. So again, we certainly think this is going to have a positive impact. And again, as things are moving forward, we think this just makes the product that much better and has another benefit so.
Okay. I do have a follow-up. So for the J-code for ZYNRELEF, it's also applicable to the prefilled syringe and also for the VAN, right?
It would be once the prefilled syringe is launched. Yes, that's correct.
Thank you. This concludes the question-and-answer session. I will now turn it over to Craig Collard, CEO, for closing remarks.
Thank you, operator, and thank you, everyone, for joining the call today, and we look forward to speaking to you all next quarter.
Thank you for your participation in today's conference. This does conclude the program. You may now disconnect.
Heron Therapeutics Inc — Q3 2025 Earnings Call
Financial data from Heron Therapeutics Inc
Revenue
Revenue is the sum of all sales generated by a company, e.g. for its products or services.
Revenue (TTM) metric explainedDirect Costs
Direct costs are the costs incurred directly in connection with the manufacture of the product or service.
Gross Profit
Gross Profit indicates how much of the revenue remains in the company after deducting direct production costs. If the percentage share of sales is calculated, this is referred to as the gross margin.
Gross Profit metric explainedSelling and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) include all expenses for marketing and sales as well as the general administration of the company.
Research and Development Expense
Research and development costs (R&D) provide information on how much the company invests in the research and development of its products. The costs are particularly interesting as a percentage of revenue and in comparison to direct competitors.
EBITDA
EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization) is the company's earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. The EBITDA margin is calculated as a percentage of sales.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation represents reductions in the value of the company's assets (e.g. due to wear and tear on machinery).
EBIT (Operating Income)
EBIT (Earnings Before Interest and Taxes) is the company's profit before interest and taxes, also known as the operating income. The EBIT Margin is calculated as a percentage of sales at
.
Net Profit
Net Profit represents the profit or loss after deduction of all costs.
Net Profit metric explainedStocksGuide Premium
| Jun '26 |
+/-
%
|
||
| Revenue | 151 151 |
1%
1%
100%
|
|
| - Direct Costs | 45 45 |
19%
19%
30%
|
|
| Gross Profit | 106 106 |
5%
5%
70%
|
|
| - Selling and Administrative Expenses | 105 105 |
7%
7%
69%
|
|
| - Research and Development Expense | 12 12 |
4%
4%
8%
|
|
| EBITDA | -20 -20 |
950%
950%
-13%
|
|
| - Depreciation and Amortization | 2.13 2.13 |
8%
8%
1%
|
|
| EBIT (Operating Income) EBIT | -22 -22 |
69,484%
69,484%
-15%
|
|
| Net Profit | -34 -34 |
3,561%
3,561%
-23%
|
|
In millions USD.
Don't miss a Thing! We will send you all news about Heron Therapeutics Inc directly to your mailbox free of charge.
If you wish, we will send you an e-mail every morning with news on stocks of your portfolios.
Heron Therapeutics Inc Stock News
Company Profile
Heron Therapeutics, Inc. is a biotechnology company, which engages in the development of pharmaceutical products for patients suffering from cancer. Its products portfolio include SUSTOL, Cinvanti, HTX-011, and HTX-034. The company was founded in February 1983 and is headquartered in Redwood City, CA.
StocksGuide Premium
| Head office | United States |
| CEO | Mr. Collard |
| Employees | 128 |
| Founded | 1983 |
| Website | www.herontx.com |


