Horizon Technology Finance Corporation Stock price
Is Horizon Technology Finance Corporation a Top Scorer Stock based on the Dividend, High-Growth-Investing or Leverman Strategy?
As a Free StocksGuide user, you can view scores for all 9,134 stocks worldwide.
StocksGuide Premium
StocksGuide Unlimited
Key metrics
📘 Market Capitalization
📈 What is it?
Market capitalization shows how much a company is currently worth on the stock market.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It helps classify companies by size (Large, Mid, Small Cap) and indicates their market presence and relative stability.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Large-cap companies tend to be more stable, often pay dividends, but may grow more slowly.
- Smaller firms may offer higher growth potential but come with more volatility.
- Market capitalization is a useful indicator of company size — but not a measure of whether a stock is undervalued or overvalued.
📘 Enterprise Value (EV)
📈 What is it?
Enterprise Value represents the total cost to acquire a company — including its debt and excluding its cash reserves.
🧮 How is it calculated?
(= Market Cap + Net Debt)
🏛️ Why is it important?
EV gives a more complete picture of a company's value than market cap alone and is used in key valuation ratios like EV/FCF or EV/Sales.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Enterprise Value shows the true cost of buying a company, including all financial obligations.
- It is more accurate than just looking at market cap, especially when comparing companies with different levels of debt or cash.
- Professional investors prefer EV-based multiples because they better reflect the company’s full financial footprint.
📘 Net Debt
📈 What is it?
Net Debt shows how much debt remains after subtracting a company’s available cash reserves.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It indicates how dependent a company is on borrowed money and how easily it can service its debt in the short term.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Low or negative net debt signals financial strength and flexibility.
- Companies with strong cash positions are better positioned in crises.
- High net debt increases financial risk — especially in environments with rising interest rates or economic downturns.
📘 Cash
📈 What is it?
Cash represents all liquid assets a company can access immediately — including cash, bank deposits, and short-term investments.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It reflects a company’s financial flexibility and resilience — enabling investments, buybacks, or buffer in downturns.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A strong cash position means greater room for maneuver and crisis resistance.
- Cash-rich companies can invest, pay down debt, or repurchase shares.
- But excess idle cash might indicate a lack of growth opportunities.
📘 Shares Outstanding
📈 What is it?
Shares outstanding represent the total number of a company’s shares currently held by investors — excluding treasury stock.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It’s the basis for key metrics like Earnings Per Share (EPS), Market Capitalization, or the Price/Earnings ratio (P/E).
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Fewer shares in circulation typically increase earnings per share — making each share more valuable.
- Share buybacks reduce the number of shares and boost per-share metrics.
- Issuing new shares does the opposite — diluting shareholder value and lowering per-share figures.
📘 Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E)
📈 What is it?
The P/E ratio shows how many times a company's earnings per share are reflected in its current share price — in other words, how "expensive" the stock appears relative to its profits.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
The P/E ratio is one of the most widely used valuation metrics. It helps investors assess whether a stock appears cheap or expensive compared to its earnings power.
🧮 Calculation
📊 P/E (TTM) = Based on earnings from the last 12 months (Trailing Twelve Months):🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low P/E may indicate undervaluation — or signal underlying issues.
- A high P/E may reflect strong growth expectations — or an overvalued stock.
📘 Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S)
📈 What is it?
The P/S ratio shows how much investors are paying for $1 of the company’s revenue – regardless of profitability.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
P/S is especially useful for evaluating growth companies or businesses not yet profitable. It reflects how the market values the company’s sales.
🧮 Calculation
Market Cap = $303.66m | Revenue (TTM) = $66.05m
Market Cap = $303.66m | Estimated Revenue = $103.86m
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low P/S may indicate undervaluation — or low profitability.
- A high P/S can reflect strong growth expectations — or excessive optimism.
- Especially helpful when evaluating companies where profits are low, volatile, or negative.
📘 Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales)
📈 What is it?
EV/Sales shows how much investors are paying for $1 of revenue — considering not just equity, but also debt and cash. It’s the capital structure–adjusted version of the P/S ratio.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It’s ideal for comparing companies with different levels of debt. It reflects a company's true cost relative to its revenue.
🧮 Calculation
Enterprise Value = $573.77m | Revenue (TTM) = $66.05m
Enterprise Value = $573.77m | Forward Revenue = $103.86m
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- EV/Sales allows for capital structure–neutral company comparisons.
- A lower ratio may indicate undervaluation; a higher one may signal strong growth expectations or overvaluation.
- Especially helpful when evaluating high-growth companies with low or negative earnings.
📘 Enterprise Value to Free Cash Flow (EV/FCF)
📈 What is it?
EV/FCF shows how many years it would take for a company to "pay back" its enterprise value using its free cash flow.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It focuses on real cash generation, ignoring accounting noise — ideal for assessing profitability and value based on liquidity, not earnings.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low EV/FCF may signal undervaluation and strong cash generation.
- A high EV/FCF might reflect weak recent cash flow or aggressive growth expectations.
- Best suited for stable, mature businesses with predictable free cash flows.
📘 Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B)
📈 What is it?
The P/B ratio compares a company’s market value to its book value — showing how much investors are paying for each dollar of net assets.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
P/B is commonly used for asset-heavy industries like banks or industrials. It helps assess whether a stock is trading above or below its net asset value.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A P/B below 1 may signal undervaluation — or weak profitability.
- A P/B above 1 implies the market expects future value creation (e.g., brand, IP, growth).
- Best used for companies with tangible assets and strong balance sheets.
📘 Dividend per Share (DPS)
📈 What is it?
Dividend per Share shows how much cash a company pays out to shareholders for each share they own – usually on an annual or quarterly basis.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
DPS is the absolute value of the payout per share – crucial for income-focused investors and dividend strategies.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A stable or growing DPS often signals a strong, shareholder-friendly business.
- DPS alone doesn’t tell you how attractive the payout is – the stock price also matters (→ see Dividend Yield).
- Long-term dividend growth is often a hallmark of high-quality companies – like the dividend aristocrats.
📘 Dividend Yield
📈 What is it?
Dividend yield shows how large a company’s dividend is in relation to its current share price.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It allows investors to compare dividend payouts across stocks, regardless of price or payout size.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A stable yield can reflect reliable distributions.
- Comparing 1Y and 5Y yield shows whether dividend growth keeps pace with stock price appreciation.
- A low yield isn’t always negative – it can signal strong past performance or growth focus.
📘 Dividend Growth
📈 What is it?
Dividend growth shows how much a company has increased its dividend per share over time.
🧮 How is it calculated?
5Y: Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR)
🏛️ Why is it important?
Consistently rising dividends are often a sign of financial strength and shareholder orientation – especially relevant for long-term investors.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Stable dividend growth is a sign of sustainable earning power.
- High dividend growth can significantly boost your total return:
- If a company pays $1 in dividends and increases it by 15% annually over 5 years, you’ll receive $2 per share in year 5 – twice as much as at the start!
📘 Payout Ratio
📈 What is it?
The payout ratio shows what percentage of a company’s earnings (per share) is distributed to shareholders as dividends.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It helps assess whether the dividend is sustainable – especially in relation to the company’s profitability.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low payout ratio means the company retains more earnings for reinvestment – typical for growth companies.
- A moderate payout (e.g. 25–50%) indicates a healthy balance between returns and reinvestment.
- High payout ratios may seem attractive but can carry risk if earnings decline.
📘 Consecutive Dividend Increases
📈 What is it?
This metric shows how many consecutive years a company has raised its dividend per share – without any cuts or pauses.
🧮 How is it calculated?
(Special dividends are not considered.)
🏛️ Why is it important?
A long track record of increases reflects financial strength, consistency, and shareholder commitment.
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A long dividend increase streak builds confidence – especially in volatile markets.
- Such companies are seen as reliable and income-friendly investments.
- The longer the streak, the stronger the company’s dividend discipline.
📘 Revenue
📈 What is it?
Revenue shows how much a company earns in total from selling its products and services – the gross income before any costs are deducted.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Revenue is one of the key figures to assess a company’s size, market position, and growth potential.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Growing revenue indicates rising demand and can be an early signal of future earnings growth.
- Comparing actual and expected revenue reveals trends in the market environment and analyst sentiment.
- Note: Strong revenue alone isn’t enough – margins and profitability matter just as much.
📘 EBITDA
📈 What is it?
EBITDA stands for “Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization.” It reflects a company’s operating profit before the effects of financing, taxes, and accounting depreciation.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
EBITDA is widely used to evaluate a company’s operating performance – especially across capital-intensive sectors or international comparisons.
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high or growing EBITDA indicates strong operational profitability – independent of taxes, interest, or accounting methods.
- It’s especially useful for comparing companies across sectors or geographies.
- Important: EBITDA is not a net income figure – it excludes key costs like depreciation and interest.
📘 EBIT
📈 What is it?
EBIT stands for “Earnings Before Interest and Taxes.” It reflects a company’s operating profit after depreciation, but before interest and tax expenses.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
EBIT is a core profitability metric that shows how well the company performs in its main business operations – independent of capital structure and tax environment.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high EBIT indicates strong profitability from the company’s core business – before financial and tax effects.
- It allows better comparison between companies with different debt levels or tax structures.
- Compared to EBITDA, EBIT already accounts for depreciation and reflects capital intensity more clearly.
📘 Net Income
📈 What is it?
Net income is the company’s total profit – the amount left after all expenses, taxes, interest, and depreciation have been deducted.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Net income is the most comprehensive measure of a company’s profitability – showing how much actual profit remains after all business and financing costs.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Growing net income indicates that the company is managing all of its costs efficiently.
- It directly influences valuation metrics like P/E ratio and the company’s dividend capacity.
- Over time, net income trends reveal how resilient and profitable the business model really is.
📘 Free Cash Flow (FCF)
📈 What is it?
Free Cash Flow shows how much actual cash remains after a company covers its operating expenses and capital expenditures.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
FCF reflects a company’s real financial strength – regardless of accounting profits. It shows how much flexibility a company has for dividends, share buybacks, or debt reduction.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- High free cash flow means the company generates real, usable cash – independent of reported net income.
- It’s often the most reliable base for sustainable dividends and buybacks.
- Declining FCF can be an early warning sign – even when profits appear stable.
📘 Revenue Growth
📈 What is it?
Revenue growth shows how much a company’s sales have changed compared to the previous year – both on a trailing basis (TTM) and based on forward projections.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Forward = (Expected revenue ÷ Revenue in prior year − 1) × 100
Forward growth is based on analyst estimates for the current fiscal year.
🏛️ Why is it important?
Rising revenue signals growing demand, business expansion, and market share gains – especially important for growth-oriented companies.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Growth is the engine of long-term value creation – especially in tech and growth sectors.
- What matters is not just current growth, but its sustainability.
- Forward projections reflect whether analysts expect continued momentum – or a slowdown.
📘 EBITDA Growth
📈 What is it?
EBITDA growth shows how much a company’s operating profit (before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) has increased or decreased compared to the previous year.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Forward = (Expected EBITDA ÷ EBITDA from prior year − 1) × 100
The forward estimate is based on analyst projections for the current fiscal year.
🏛️ Why is it important?
Growing EBITDA indicates improving operational profitability – regardless of financing or accounting effects.
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Strong EBITDA growth signals operational efficiency and scalability – especially during growth phases.
- EBITDA growth can be an early indicator of margin and earnings expansion – but should be assessed alongside revenue and EBIT.
📘 EBIT Growth
📈 What is it?
EBIT growth shows how much a company’s operating profit (after depreciation, but before interest and taxes) has increased compared to the previous year.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Forward = (Expected EBIT ÷ EBIT from prior year − 1) × 100
The forward estimate is based on analyst projections for the current fiscal year.
🏛️ Why is it important?
EBIT growth is a direct indicator of a company’s business performance – taking into account capital intensity through depreciation.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Rising EBIT signals improving operating profitability – even after accounting for depreciation.
- It’s especially important for evaluating companies with significant capital expenditures.
- Combined with revenue and EBITDA growth, EBIT growth provides a well-rounded view of operational progress.
📘 Net Income Growth
📈 What is it?
Net income growth shows how much a company’s bottom-line profit has increased or decreased compared to the previous year – both on a trailing basis (TTM) and based on analyst projections.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Forward = (Expected net income ÷ Net income from prior year − 1) × 100
The forward estimate reflects analysts’ expectations for the current fiscal year.
🏛️ Why is it important?
Net income is the ultimate measure of profitability. Growing net income signals stronger efficiency, cost control, and sustainable earnings power.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Stronger net income boosts valuation, dividend potential, and investor confidence.
- If profits stall while revenue grows, it may signal margin pressure.
📘 Free Cash Flow Growth
📈 What is it?
Free cash flow (FCF) growth shows how a company’s available cash – after covering operating expenses and capital expenditures – has changed compared to the previous year.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Free cash flow reflects real financial strength. Growing FCF indicates more flexibility for dividends, share buybacks, and reinvestment.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Declining FCF may point to rising investments, increasing costs, or weaker operating performance.
- Especially for dividend investors, FCF growth is critical – since dividends are paid from actual available cash.
- A negative trend isn't always bad, but it deserves closer attention.
📘 Gross Margin
📈 What is it?
Gross margin shows how much of a company’s revenue remains after deducting the direct costs of goods sold (like materials and production). It represents the company’s “raw profit” before fixed costs, taxes, and interest.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Or simply: Gross Margin = Gross Profit ÷ Revenue × 100
🏛️ Why is it important?
Gross margin indicates how efficiently a company can produce or procure what it sells. It is a key measure of product-level profitability and pricing power.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high gross margin suggests strong pricing power and efficient production.
- Falling margins may signal rising input costs or competitive pressure.
- Compared to peers, gross margin offers insights into the quality of a business model.
📘 EBITDA Margin
📈 What is it?
The EBITDA margin shows how much of a company’s revenue remains as operating profit before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization.It reflects operating efficiency without being distorted by financing or accounting factors.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
The EBITDA margin reveals how much operating income a company generates per dollar of revenue – independent of capital structure and tax effects.
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high EBITDA margin reflects strong core profitability – before accounting distortions.
- It allows for effective comparisons across companies and sectors.
- A stable or growing margin signals efficient cost control and business scalability.
📘 EBIT Margin
📈 What is it?
The EBIT margin shows what percentage of revenue remains as operating profit after depreciation but before interest and taxes.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
The EBIT margin reflects a company’s core profitability while accounting for capital intensity (e.g. machinery, infrastructure). It’s especially useful for comparing businesses with different levels of depreciation.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high EBIT margin shows that the company remains efficient even after factoring in depreciation.
- It’s especially relevant for capital-intensive industries.
- Stable or rising EBIT margins over time are a strong indicator of pricing power and business quality.
📘 Net margin
📈 What is it?
Net margin shows how much of a company’s revenue remains as bottom-line profit after deducting all costs, interest, taxes, and depreciation.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Net margin reflects a company’s overall efficiency – across operations, financing, and taxation. It shows how much actual profit is generated from each dollar of revenue.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high net margin means the company is not only strong operationally but also manages financing and taxes efficiently.
- Peer comparisons reveal business quality and competitiveness.
- Declining margins despite revenue growth can be a red flag for rising costs or inefficiencies.
📘 Free cash flow margin
📈 What is it?
The free cash flow (FCF) margin shows how much of a company’s revenue remains as actual free cash after covering all operating expenses and capital expenditures.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
This margin reflects the true liquidity generated by the business – independent of accounting rules or depreciation. It’s especially relevant for dividends, buybacks, and reinvestment decisions.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high FCF margin means a company consistently generates strong cash flow.
- It’s a positive signal for financial stability and shareholder returns.
- The long-term trend is key – a declining margin may indicate rising investments or weakening operating efficiency.
📘 Equity Ratio
📈 What is it?
The equity ratio indicates what portion of a company’s total assets is financed by shareholders’ equity – in other words, how much it relies on its own capital.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
A high equity ratio reflects financial strength and stability, especially during downturns. It’s a key indicator of a company’s solvency and long-term risk profile.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Companies with high equity ratios are generally more resilient and less dependent on external debt.
- Low equity ratios can signal higher risk or aggressive financial strategies.
- Important: Always assess the equity ratio in combination with the return on equity (ROE). This shows not just how stable the company is – but also how efficiently it uses shareholder capital.
📘 Return on Equity (ROE)
📈 What is it?
Return on equity (ROE) shows how efficiently a company uses its shareholders’ equity to generate profit. In other words: how much net income is earned per dollar of equity.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
ROE is a core profitability metric. It helps investors understand whether a company delivers attractive returns on the capital provided by its shareholders.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high ROE indicates that the company is using its capital efficiently and profitably.
- It’s especially meaningful for capital-intensive businesses or firms with high equity bases.
- Important: A very high ROE can also result from high debt levels – always interpret it alongside the equity ratio to assess financial health.
📘 Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
📈 What is it?
ROCE measures how efficiently a company generates profits from its total capital – including both equity and interest-bearing debt.
🧮 How is it calculated?
It evaluates the return on all capital employed, regardless of how it’s financed.
🏛️ Why is it important?
ROCE is ideal for comparing companies with different financing structures. It shows how well management uses capital to create value for both shareholders and creditors.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high ROCE means the company uses its capital efficiently – regardless of whether it's funded by debt or equity.
- The higher the ROCE compared to peers, the more value the company creates with its invested capital.
- Especially relevant for capital-intensive sectors like industrials, energy, or infrastructure.
📘 Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
📈 What is it?
ROIC measures how efficiently a company generates returns from the capital invested in its core operations – regardless of whether the capital comes from equity or debt.
🧮 How is it calculated?
- NOPAT = Net Operating Profit After Taxes
- Invested Capital = Operating assets minus non-interest-bearing liabilities
🏛️ Why is it important?
ROIC is one of the most accurate indicators of capital efficiency. Unlike return on equity, it is not distorted by leverage and shows how much value is created for all capital providers.
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high ROIC shows how effectively a company uses the capital that is truly invested in its core operations.
- Unlike ROCE, ROIC focuses only on the capital that is actively used to run the business – and that requires a return (i.e. interest-bearing).
- Especially useful when comparing companies with large amounts of excess cash or non-interest-bearing liabilities – giving a more realistic picture of capital efficiency.
📘 Leverage Ratio (Debt-to-Equity)
📈 What is it?
The leverage ratio indicates how much a company relies on interest-bearing debt (such as loans and bonds) relative to its shareholders’ equity.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
This ratio helps assess a company’s financial structure and risk profile. High leverage can enhance returns – but also increases exposure to interest rate changes and financial stress.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low leverage ratio signals financial strength and independence.
- A higher ratio can improve returns in good times but increases risk during downturns or rising interest rate periods.
- 👉 Always interpret in the context of industry, capital intensity, and interest rate environment.
📘 Earnings per share (EPS)
📈 What is it?
Earnings per Share (EPS) shows how much profit is attributable to a single share – and is one of the most important metrics for evaluating a company's performance.
🧮 How is it calculated?
The diluted share count reflects potential new shares that could be issued through options, convertible bonds, or other rights.
🏛️ Why is it important?
EPS is the basis for many key valuation metrics like P/E ratio, PEG ratio, or payout ratio. It enables comparisons of profitability across companies, regardless of their size.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- EPS captures per-share profitability and is especially useful for comparisons over time or with analyst estimates.
- Rising EPS may signal consistent growth or share buybacks.
- Important: Always use diluted EPS for more realistic valuations – especially in companies with stock-based compensation.
📘 Free cash flow per share (FCF per share)
📈 What is it?
Free Cash Flow per Share shows how much free cash flow a company generates per outstanding share – after investments, but before dividends or debt repayments.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Free cash flow is calculated as operating cash flow minus capital expenditures (CapEx).
🏛️ Why is it important?
FCF per Share reveals how much real cash is available per share – useful for dividends, buybacks, or reducing debt. Unlike net income, free cash flow is harder to manipulate and often seen as a more reliable metric.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- High FCF per share signals strong financial flexibility.
- It shows how much capital the company can effectively reinvest or return to shareholders.
- Particularly relevant for dividend payers and capital-efficient businesses.
📘 Short interest
📈 What is it?
Short interest indicates how many shares of a company are currently sold short – that is, borrowed and sold by investors who expect the price to decline.
🧮 How is it calculated?
It reflects the percentage of a company’s shares that are being shorted relative to the total shares available.
🏛️ Why is it important?
Short interest serves as a sentiment indicator: A high value may signal skepticism or bearish expectations – but also increases the potential for a short squeeze if prices rise unexpectedly.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Low short interest usually indicates market confidence in the company.
- High short interest can be a warning sign – or an opportunity if sentiment shifts.
- Especially relevant in volatile markets or ahead of key earnings releases.
📘 Employees
📈 What is it?
The employee count shows how many people a company employs worldwide – offering insights into its size, structure, and business model.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It helps assess operational scale, labor intensity, and cost structure. Combined with revenue and profit, it enables key metrics like revenue per employee or productivity.
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high headcount can signal operational complexity – but also significant growth capacity.
- Revenue per employee is a key indicator of efficiency.
- Especially useful for comparing tech, industrial, or service-heavy companies.
📘 Turnover per employee
📈 What is it?
Revenue per employee indicates how much revenue a company generates on average per employee – a key measure of efficiency and productivity.
🧮 How is it calculated?
The employee count is typically taken from the most recent annual report.
🏛️ Why is it important?
This metric helps compare business models – especially between labor-intensive and technology-driven companies. A high value suggests automation, operational efficiency, or strong value creation per head.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high revenue per employee indicates a scalable and margin-strong business model.
- A low figure may reflect labor-intensive operations or lower value-add.
- Especially helpful when comparing tech companies to industrial or service sectors.
Horizon Technology Finance Corporation Stock Analysis
Analyst Opinions
12 Analysts have issued a Horizon Technology Finance Corporation forecast:
Analyst Opinions
12 Analysts have issued a Horizon Technology Finance Corporation forecast:
Horizon Technology Finance Corporation Events
Past Events
|
AUG
5
Q2 2026 Earnings Call
about one month ago
|
|
MAY
6
Q1 2026 Earnings Call
4 months ago
|
|
MAR
4
Q4 2025 Earnings Call
7 months ago
|
|
OCT
29
Q3 2025 Earnings Call
11 months ago
|
StocksGuide Free
Horizon Technology Finance Corporation — Q2 2026 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Greetings, and welcome to the Horizon Technology Finance Second Quarter 2026 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to your host, Megan Bacon. You may begin.
Thank you, and welcome to Horizon Technology Finance Corporation's Second Quarter 2026 Conference Call. Representing the company today are Mike Balkin, Chief Executive Officer; Paul Seitz, Chief Investment Officer; and Dan Trolio, Chief Financial Officer.
I would like to point out that the Q2 earnings press release and Form 10-Q are available on the company's website at horizontechfinance.com. Before we begin our formal remarks, I need to remind everyone that during this conference call, the company will make certain forward-looking statements, including statements with regard to the future performance of the company.
Words such as believes, expects, anticipates, intends or similar expressions are used to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to the inherent uncertainties in predicting future results and conditions.
Certain factors could cause actual results to differ on a material basis from those projected in these forward-looking statements. And some of these factors are detailed in the risk factor discussion in the company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025. The company undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
At this time, I would like to turn the call over to Horizon's CEO, Mike Balkin.
Thanks, Megan. Welcome, everyone, and thank you for your interest in Horizon. Today, we will update you on our quarterly performance and the current operating environment. Paul Seitz, our Chief Investment Officer, will take us through recent business and portfolio developments as well as the current status of the venture lending market; and Dan Trolio, our Chief Financial Officer, will detail our operating performance and financial condition. We will then take questions.
In April, we completed our merger with Monroe Capital Corporation, significantly enhancing our available capital for investments and kicking off our next chapter of growth. To that end, we have been very active over the past several months, laying the foundation for sustainable and profitable long-term growth.
That includes enhancing our underwriting and credit capabilities to improve the quality of our portfolio, optimizing the technology stack throughout our organization and making key investments in our people and our origination platform.
We believe the investments we are making today and which we expect to make over the next several months are appropriately setting the stage for us to consistently grow our portfolio over time, steadily increase our NII and ultimately create additional value for shareholders.
We have the right team and a scalable platform in place and the backing of Monroe Capital, one of the premier asset management firms in the country. It is now incumbent upon us to execute, and we expect to do so in the quarters ahead as we take the Horizon platform to the next level.
Turning to our specific results for the quarter. We grew our debt investment portfolio for the third consecutive quarter, funding 9 investments totaling $73 million, while our total portfolio size ended at $677 million. We generated net investment income, excluding nonrecurring onetime merger expenses, of $0.18 per share, which covered our regular distributions, while our NAV per share ended the quarter at $6.23 a share.
Our NAV per share was down $0.75 per share for the quarter, primarily due to write-downs of one of our larger investments, which Paul will discuss later. Based on our outlook and our undistributed spillover income, our Board declared regular monthly distributions of $0.06 per share payable in October, November and December of 2026.
Consistent with our announcement prior to the closing of the merger, our Board also declared special monthly distributions of $0.03 per share, also payable in October, November and December of 2026. As we prudently work to deploy the capital from the merger and move towards our target leverage, it remains our goal to deliver NII at or above our declared distributions over time.
We achieved a portfolio yield on debt investments of just under 15% for the second quarter at or near the top of the BDC industry. We finished the quarter with a committed and approved backlog of $228 million, up $48 million from the prior quarter end. We repurchased approximately 1.4 million shares of our common stock in the quarter, reflecting the confidence we have in our near- and long-term outlook.
Additionally, on August 3, our Board approved an increase in the amount of common stock that may be repurchased under the stock repurchase program to allow the company to repurchase up to an additional $20 million of common stock. And finally, we continue to win attractive venture debt and small-cap public company investments while building our pipeline of loan opportunities.
Despite our challenges, we remain excited about what we are building at Horizon. We will execute on our strategic vision, creating a sustainable growth engine and increasing our NII and NAV over time. Again, we appreciate your continued interest and support in the Horizon Technology Finance platform.
I will now turn the call over to our Chief Investment Officer, Paul Seitz, to give you the details of our second quarter results and progress. Paul?
Thanks, Mike, and good morning to everyone. Our team has been hard at work over the past few months in all facets of our business in originations, underwriting and credit to name a few, to position Horizon for sustainable and profitable growth on a consistent basis.
We are making excellent progress and remain excited for our long-term future. At the end of the quarter, our current portfolio stood at $677 million as our third consecutive quarter of debt investment portfolio growth was offset by the write-downs of large investments in one portfolio company.
As Mike alluded to in his remarks, we learned in June 2026 that one of our portfolio companies, Soli, had its equity raising plan significantly impacted by cash burn in excess of its projections following its $32.5 million equity raise completed in 2 phases, one at the end of March and the other at the first half of April.
As a result, we wrote down our entire $20 million equity holding, which we obtained in August of last year when we converted a portion of our debt investment as part of Soli's strategic merger and receipt of significant equity investment. We also wrote down $19 million of our debt investment in the company. We are focused on recovering as much value as possible from these investments.
In the second quarter, we funded 9 debt investments in our target sectors totaling $73 million. We also made considerable progress in further building our pipeline, including larger venture loan opportunities in our target sectors. One of those pipeline opportunities, StarCompliance, closed in July.
In Q2, we increased our committed backlog by approximately $50 million from the end of Q1, which positions us well to further grow our portfolio in the quarters ahead. In Q3, we expect another quarter of debt investment portfolio growth driven by our current pipeline.
Along with the loans we have already funded in the third quarter, we have also been awarded 4 new venture loan transactions, which represent $87 million in total commitments. We will continue to be disciplined in originating and underwriting new loans.
During the second quarter, we experienced 3 loan prepayments totaling $39 million in prepaid principal. Our onboarding debt investment yield of 12% during the second quarter remained consistent with our historic levels. We expect to continue to generate strong onboarding yields with our current pipeline of opportunities, which we believe will generate strong net investment income over time.
Our debt portfolio yield of 14.9% for the quarter was once again among the highest yielding debt portfolios in the BDC industry. Our ability to generate industry-leading yields continues to be a testament to our venture lending strategy and our execution of such strategy across various market cycles and interest rate environments.
As of June 30, we held warrants, equity and other investments in 96 portfolio companies with a fair value of $28 million. During this quarter, we were pleased to realize proceeds of $2.3 million from the redemption of warrants and equity in 2 investments.
Structuring investments with warrants and equity rights is a key component of our venture debt strategy and a potential generator of shareholder value. As mentioned, we ended the quarter with a committed backlog of $228 million compared to $180 million at the end of the first quarter.
We believe our pipeline of investment opportunities, combined with our committed backlog with most of our funding commitments subject to companies achieving certain key milestones, provides a solid base to prudently grow our portfolio over time.
One item to note is that we have revised our internal credit rating scale. Effective June 30, we changed our internal credit rating scale from a 4-to-1 scale where 4 represented the highest credit rating to a 1-to-5 scale where 1 now represents the highest credit rating. This change was made to align us with the scale used by Monroe Capital and to improve consistency and efficiency across our adviser and organization, especially as we make and anticipate continuing to make co-investments with Monroe.
As of quarter end, under the new 1-to-5 scale, 88% of the fair value of our debt portfolio consisted of 1, 2 or 3 rated debt investments, while 12% of the fair value of our portfolio was rated 4 or 5.
We continue to collaborate with all of our portfolio companies and utilizing a variety of strategies to optimize returns and create future value. Turning to the venture capital environment. According to PitchBook, approximately $146 billion was invested in VC-backed companies in the second quarter, the second-highest quarter on record after last quarter's record $267 billion.
First half 2026 deal value is already 30% above the full year total for last year, with 6 months still to go. Nearly all the investment, 86%, consists of large investments in AI. The market remains significantly bifurcated with companies at the very top receiving the lion's share of capital.
The story is not much different in the exit markets. SpaceX completed the largest IPO of all time with a $1.7 trillion valuation and potential IPOs from OpenAI and Anthropic later this year also have the potential to exit at trillion-dollar valuations.
However, excluding SpaceX, exit value was more in line with prior quarters and the IPO market continues to remain relatively muted for non-AI companies as the current geopolitical and macro uncertainty continues. Despite the top-heavy market, we believe significant opportunities remain for venture loan originations in both life sciences and tech as evidenced by both our growing debt investment portfolio and increasing pipeline of opportunities.
We continue to believe venture debt remains a compelling option for high-quality companies to access additional capital. It has been an active first few months at Horizon post-merger. We have a significantly stronger balance sheet. We've accelerated the building of our pipeline of opportunities, and we continue to grow our debt investment portfolio through originating venture debt to small-cap public loans to high-quality leading-edge companies. We are confident that we are setting the stage for sustainable growth, improved financial performance and creating value for shareholders.
With that, I will now turn the call over to our Chief Financial Officer, Dan Trolio.
Thanks, Paul, and good morning, everyone. Following our merger with MRCC in April, with a significantly stronger balance sheet and a growing origination pipeline, we believe we are laying a strong foundation to deliver sustainable long-term growth and create additional value for our shareholders moving forward.
As of June 30, we had $229 million in available liquidity, consisting of $135 million in cash and $94 million in funds available to be drawn under our existing credit facilities. As of June 30, we had no amount outstanding under our $150 million KeyBank credit facility, $181 million outstanding under our $250 million New York Life credit facility and $90 million outstanding on our $150 million Nuveen credit facility, leaving us with ample capacity to grow our portfolio of debt investments.
Our debt-to-equity ratio stood at 0.97:1 as of June 30, and netting out cash on our balance sheet, our net leverage was 0.65:1, well below our target leverage. Based on our cash position and our borrowing capacity, our potential new investment capacity as of June 30 was $459 million.
During the quarter, we repurchased approximately 1.4 million shares of our common stock at an average price of $4.54 under our stock repurchase program. In addition, on August 3, 2026, our Board increased the amount of common stock that may be repurchased under the stock repurchase program to allow the company to repurchase up to a total of $20 million of common stock.
We expect to remain opportunistic with respect to our stock repurchase program, given the dislocation between our current valuation and our confidence in the near- and long-term outlook of Horizon. Turning to our operating results. For the second quarter, we earned investment income of $25 million compared to $24.5 million in the prior year period, primarily due to higher interest income on our debt investment portfolio.
Our debt investment portfolio on a net cost basis stood at $682 million as of June 30, up 4% compared to $655 million as of March 31, 2026. For the second quarter of '26, we achieved onboarding yields of 12%, in line with what we achieved in the first quarter of '26. Our loan portfolio yield was 14.9% for the second quarter compared to 15.8% for last year's second quarter.
Total expenses for the quarter were $17.4 million compared to $12.7 million in the second quarter of '25 due primarily to $4.4 million of nonrecurring onetime expenses related to our completion of the merger with MRCC. Our interest expense of $7.8 million was $0.4 million lower than last year's second quarter, while our base management fee was $3.1 million, up $0.2 million from the prior year period.
As a reminder, our adviser agreed to waive up to $4 million of base management fees and incentive fees, or $1 million a quarter, starting in Q3 2026. Net investment income for the second quarter of '26 was $0.11 per share compared to $0.19 per share in the first quarter of '26 and $0.28 per share for the second quarter of '25.
Net investment income for the second quarter of '26 was reduced by $4.4 million, or $0.07 per share, by the nonrecurring onetime merger expenses. Excluding merger expenses, net investment income would have been $0.18 per share, which would have covered our regular distributions.
The company's undistributed spillover income as of June 30 was $0.33 per share. Based upon our outlook and undistributed spillover income, our Board declared monthly distributions of $0.06 per share for October, November and December of '26. In concert with the Board's announced intent at the time of the MRCC merger, our Board also declared $0.03 per share special distributions, also payable in October, November and December of '26.
We anticipate that our expanded capital base and available leverage, our expectation for growth and our predictive pricing strategy will enable us to generate NII that covers our distribution over time. To summarize our portfolio activities for the second quarter, new originations totaled $73 million, which were offset by $6 million in scheduled principal payments and $42 million in principal prepayments and partial paydowns.
We ended the quarter with a total investment portfolio of $677 million. At June 30, the portfolio consisted of debt investments in 43 companies with an aggregate fair value of $648 million and a portfolio of warrant, equity and other investments in 96 companies with an aggregate fair value of $28 million. Our NAV as of June 30 was $6.23 per share compared to $6.98 per share on March 31 and compared to $6.75 as of June 30, 2025.
The NAV reduction on a quarterly basis was primarily due to the write-downs related to our Soli investments that Paul previously discussed. As we've consistently noted, nearly 100% of the outstanding principal amount of our debt investments bear interest at floating rates. Of those investments, approximately 61% are already at their interest rate floors, which should mitigate the impact of any decline in interest rates. Conversely, rising interest rates will increase the earning income on 99% of our portfolio investments. This concludes our opening remarks.
We'll be happy to take questions you may have at this time.
[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Melissa Wedel with UBS.
2. Question Answer
First, I wanted to say thanks for providing the detail that you can on the company-specific developments that drove that large write-down during the quarter. I'm curious, based on the way you characterized it, it sounds like it was pretty company-specific, but are there any other read-throughs that you have from that particular investment to other companies or industries?
Melissa, thanks for joining us today and nice to meet you, and this is Paul Seitz. Yes, we don't really discuss company details specifically per our policy. But what I could say about this event in particular is that this company faced some fundraising headwinds, and we're currently working through the process to maximize and recover as much value as possible.
Okay. One of the other things I wanted to follow up on now that the merger is in the rearview mirror, when you think about future activity and pipeline, you've talked about having the capacity to look at larger transactions. And I'm wondering if you could elaborate on that maybe. Are you looking for potentially slightly larger company exposure or bigger bite sizes? Or are you thinking about increasing portfolio diversification going forward?
Yes. I think all of that is in play. Given that we're part of Monroe, we have the ability to partner with them on certain deals and where that makes sense, we will definitely do that. The goal, obviously, is to grow the platform so that we can take larger bite sizes and larger tickets and deals, but also to be able to play into the growth phase and growth stage rather more.
So I think all of that is in play. A diversified portfolio is always nice. Growing ticket sizes is nice, but we're always going to do what's best to make sense for the portfolio where we're at right now with a vision for the future that we can get to.
[Operator Instructions] There are no further questions at this time. I would like to turn the floor back over to management with Mike Balkin for closing comments.
Thank you all for joining us this morning. We appreciate your continued interest and support in Horizon, and we look forward to speaking with you again soon. This will conclude our call.
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your participation. This does conclude today's teleconference. You may disconnect your lines, and have a wonderful day.
Horizon Technology Finance Corporation — Q1 2026 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Greetings, and welcome to the Horizon Technology Finance First Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce Megan Bacon, Director of Investor Relations and Marketing. Please go ahead.
Thank you, and welcome to Horizon Technology Finance Corporation's First Quarter 2026 Conference Call. Representing the company today are Mike Balkin, Chief Executive Officer; Paul Seitz, Chief Investment Officer; and Dan Trolio, Chief Financial Officer. I would like to point out that the Q1 earnings press release and Form 10-Q are available on the company's website at horizontechfinance.com. Before we begin our formal remarks, I need to remind everyone that during this conference call, the company will make certain forward-looking statements, including statements with regard to the future performance of the company. Words such as believes, expects, anticipates, intends or similar expressions are used to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to the inherent uncertainties in predicting future results and conditions.
Certain factors could cause actual results to differ on a material basis from those projected in these forward-looking statements, and some of these factors are detailed in the risk factor discussion in the company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025. The company undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. At this time, I would like to turn the call over to Horizon's CEO, Mike Balkin.
Thank you, Megan, and welcome, everyone, and thank you for your interest in Horizon. Today, we will update you on our quarterly performance and the current operating environment. Paul Seitz, our Chief Investment Officer, will take us through recent business and portfolio developments as well as the current status of the venture lending market; and Dan Trolio, our Chief Financial Officer, will detail our operating performance and financial condition. We will then take questions.
It has certainly been a very newsworthy and exciting couple of months for Horizon. In March, we were pleased to form RoHo, a new joint venture with Roth Capital, which will provide growth financing solutions to small and microcap public companies. Then in April, we successfully completed our merger with Monroe Capital Corp. or MRCC, officially embarking on an exciting growth path for the combined new Horizon. The merger provided us with significant increase in Horizon's equity capital available for investment in earning assets. This larger capital base affords us greater economies of scale to compete for larger cutting-edge early and later-stage venture capital deals backed by some of the leading venture capital and private equity funds.
We are also increasing our lending to small-cap public companies as evidenced by some of our latest announced transactions. Aided by the full support and backing of Monroe, we are taking the Horizon platform to the next level and are well positioned to succeed over the longer term. Turning to our specific results for the quarter. We grew our portfolio for the second consecutive quarter, funding 5 investments totaling $120 million and bringing our total portfolio size to almost $700 million. We generated net investment income of $0.19 per share, exceeding our distributions, while our NAV per share ended the quarter at $6.98. Based on our outlook and our undistributed spillover income, our Board declared regular monthly distributions of $0.06 per share payable in July, August and September of 2026. Consistent with our announcement prior to the closing of the merger, our Board also declared special monthly distributions of $0.03 per share payable in July, August and September 2026.
As we prudently work to deploy the incremental capital from the merger and move to our target leverage, it remains our goal to deliver NII at or above our declared distributions over time. We achieved a portfolio yield on debt investments of over 15% for the first quarter, once again at or near the top of the BDC industry. We finished the quarter with a committed and approved backlog of $180 million. And finally, we continue to close attractive venture debt and small-cap public company investments, while our pipeline of loan opportunities continue to grow.
Moving forward, we believe we are stronger than we have been in years and are excited for the long-term growth path we see ahead. To that end, given the dislocation between our stock price and the current net asset value, we intend to utilize our $10 million stock repurchase program in the near term. Again, we appreciate your continued interest and support in the Horizon Technology Finance platform. I will now turn the call over to our Chief Investment Officer, Paul Seitz, to give you the details of our first quarter results and progress. Paul?
Thanks, Mike, and good morning to everyone. I want to echo Mike's remarks about our excitement at closing the merger with MRCC. With the additional capital from the merger as well as our new joint venture with Roth, we now have more size and scale as well as products to originate venture and growth loans to growing public and private companies. We believe this positions us well to continue growing our portfolio and NII over time. At the end of the quarter, our current portfolio stood at $696 million as we produced our second consecutive quarter of portfolio growth. In the first quarter, we funded 5 life science debt investments, including refinancing of an existing investment, totaling $120 million.
We also made further progress in building our pipeline, including larger venture loan opportunities in our target sectors. One of those pipeline opportunities, Stellar Cyber closed in April. In Q1, we increased our committed backlog by $26 million from the end of Q4, which positions us well to further grow our portfolio in the quarters ahead. In Q2, we expect to further grow our portfolio, driven by our current pipeline. Along with Stellar Cyber, since the end of the quarter, we have been awarded 5 new venture loan transactions, representing $90 million in total commitments.
It goes without saying that we will always be disciplined in originating and underwriting new loans. During the first quarter, we experienced 1 loan prepayment and refinancing totaling $63 million in prepaid principal. Our onboarding debt investment yield of 12% during the first quarter remained consistent with our historic levels. We expect to continue to generate strong onboarding yields with our current pipeline of opportunities, which we believe will generate strong net investment income over time. Our debt portfolio yield of 15.2% for the quarter was once again among the highest yielding debt portfolios in the BDC industry. Our ability to generate industry-leading yields continues to be a testament to our venture lending strategy and our execution of such strategy across various market cycles and interest rate environments.
As of March 31, we held warrants, equity and other investments in 99 portfolio companies with a fair value of $50 million. Structuring investments with warrants and equity rights is a key component of our venture debt strategy and a potential generator of shareholder value. As mentioned, we ended the quarter with a committed and approved backlog of $180 million compared to $154 million at the end of the fourth quarter. We believe our pipeline of investment opportunities, combined with our committed backlog with most of our funding commitments subject to companies achieving certain key milestones provides a solid base to prudently grow our portfolio over time.
As of quarter end, 88% of the fair value of our debt portfolio consisted of 3 and 4 rated debt investments, while 12% of the fair value of our portfolio was rated 2 or 1, which is a modest improvement from our levels at the end of the fourth quarter. We continue to collaborate with all of our portfolio companies and utilizing a variety of strategies to optimize returns and create future value.
Turning to the venture capital environment. According to PitchBook, approximately $267 billion was invested in VC-backed companies in the first quarter, which by itself exceeded all full year totals for investment except for 2021 and 2025. However, this record performance was completely due to large investments in AI. In fact, the top 5 investments accounted for $196 billion of that amount. Venture capital dollars are flowing again. However, there is a significant bifurcation in the marketplace as only the companies at the very top are receiving the lion's share of capital.
A similar story is playing out in the exit markets. While exit value of nearly $350 billion puts 2026 on pace to smash records by June, 72% of that value is due to SpaceX's acquisition of xAI. Still excluding that acquisition, exit value of $97 billion was the largest quarter since the fourth quarter of 2021, driven primarily by AI acquisitions. The IPO market, however, remains muted with only 15 VC-backed IPOs during the quarter. Given the current geopolitical and macro uncertainty, we believe the IPO market will remain somewhat muted in the near term. Nonetheless, we believe the limited life science IPO market creates more opportunities for venture loan originations as evidenced by our fundings in the quarter.
On the tech side, though we see the IPO market is muted, we see considerable optimism for tech IPOs, while we continue to conduct deep due diligence, particularly in AI and defense technology to determine the best types of opportunities for future investments. We continue to believe that venture debt remains a compelling option for these high-quality companies to access additional capital. As we move through 2026, we are excited for the new horizon and have been hard at work in identifying and targeting larger venture loan opportunities for both private and small cap public companies given our substantially enhanced capacity profile. Additionally, we continue to work diligently on optimizing outcomes with respect to our current portfolio. We remain confident that we are on the right path to expand our portfolio over the longer term and continue to lead in the venture lending space. We expect this will lead to increased NII over time and ultimately, additional value for shareholders. With that, I will now turn the call over to our Chief Financial Officer, Dan Trolio.
Thanks, Paul, and good morning, everyone. As Mike mentioned, we're excited to have completed the merger with MRCC, which significantly strengthened our balance sheet upon closing with $141 million of additional capital. With the merger complete and with us exiting our blackout period, we expect to begin tapping our $10 million repurchase program given the dislocation between our current valuation and our confidence in the near- and long-term outlook of Horizon. In addition, we continue to diligently work with all of our portfolio companies to optimize outcomes for our investments and improve our credit quality. As such, we believe we are well positioned to grow our portfolio in the coming quarters and create additional value for our shareholders moving forward.
As of March 31, we had $105 million in available liquidity, consisting of $73 million in cash and $32 million in funds available to be drawn under our existing credit facilities. As of March 31, we had $45 million outstanding under our $150 million KeyBank credit facility, $181 million outstanding on our $250 million New York Life credit facility and $90 million outstanding on our $200 million Nuveen credit facility, leaving us with ample capacity to grow our portfolio of debt investments. Post-merger, we paid down the full amount outstanding under the KeyBank facility. Our debt-to-equity ratio stood at 1.35:1 as of March 31 and netting out cash on our balance sheet, our net leverage was 1.13:1, below our target leverage.
Based on our cash position and our borrowing capacity on our credit facilities, our potential new investment capacity as of March 31 was $357 million. Post-merger, our new investment capacity has increased by $141 million of additional capital. Turning to our operating results. For the first quarter, we earned investment income of $24 million compared to $25 million in the prior year period, primarily due to lower fee-related income on our debt investment portfolio. Our debt investment portfolio on a net cost basis stood at $655 million as of March 31, up 9% compared to $602 million as of December 31, 2025.
For the first quarter of '26, we achieved onboarding yields of 12%, in line with what we achieved in the fourth quarter of '25. Our loan portfolio yield was 15.2% for the first quarter compared to 15% for last year's first quarter. Total expenses for the quarter were $14.8 million compared to $13.4 million in the first quarter of '25. Our interest expense of $8.2 million was $0.5 million lower than last year's first quarter, while our base management fee was $3.1 million, in line with prior year period. We received $1.8 million of performance-based incentive fees in the first quarter. But as a reminder, our adviser agreed to waive up to $4 million of fees or $1 million a quarter post merger starting in Q3 of '26.
Net investment income for the first quarter of '26 was $0.19 per share compared to $0.18 per share in the fourth quarter of '25 and $0.27 per share for the first quarter of '25. We continue to expect prepayment activity will remain modest in the near term. And for the second quarter, we expect to record a nonrecurring onetime transaction expense of $4.3 million related to the completion of the merger. The company's undistributed spillover income as of March 31 was $0.52 per share. Based upon our outlook and undistributed spillover income, our Board declared monthly distributions of $0.06 per share for July, August and September 2026. In concert with the completion of the MRCC merger, our Board also declared $0.03 per share special distributions payable in July, August and September of 2026.
We anticipate with our expanded capital base and available leverage, our expectation for growth and our predictive pricing strategy will enable us to generate NII that covers our distribution over time. To summarize our portfolio activity for the first quarter, new originations totaled $120 million, which were offset by $5 million in scheduled principal payments and $63 million in principal prepayments, refinancings and partial paydowns. We ended the quarter with a total investment portfolio of $696 million. At March 31, the portfolio consisted of debt investments in 41 companies with an aggregate fair value of $646 million and a portfolio of warrant, equity and other investments in 99 companies with an aggregate fair value of $50 million. Our NAV as of March 31 was $6.98 per share comparable with where it stood on December 31 and compared to $7.57 as of March 31, 2025. The stable NAV on a quarterly basis was primarily due to NII exceeding our distributions and a shift in when we account for monthly distributions.
Moving forward, we're accounting for distributions on the ex-dividend date, which is more aligned with when most BDCs report their distributions. As we've consistently noted, nearly 100% of the outstanding principal amount of our debt investments bear interest at floating rates. Of those investments, approximately 71% are already at their interest rate floors, which should mitigate the impact of decreasing interest rates. This concludes opening remarks. We'll be happy to take questions you may have at this time.
[Operator Instructions] And our first question, we will hear from Cory Johnson with UBS.
2. Question Answer
I was wondering, could you actually just -- on the last point that you had just touched on regarding, I guess, like the NAV bridge, could you help me, I guess, to maybe understand that because I don't know if maybe I wasn't getting it correctly. But I thought NAV was flat this quarter. And obviously, there were some of the unrealized losses and such. So my understanding is correctly that the dividends that were used for the first quarter were actually the $0.18 rather than the $0.33. Is that correct?
Yes. So every quarter, we will accrue the distribution that is declared in that quarter. So normally, it would be the $0.18. There's 2 accounting guidances that public BDCs can follow. The first is related to recording your distribution on the declaration date, which would be in the quarter. And the second is recording your distribution on the ex-dividend date. And so this quarter, because of the merger and the different shareholders at different periods of time, we adjusted our policy to record the distribution on the ex-dividend date. So 1 of the 3 distributions that were declared is accrued this quarter. So the impact is $0.06 instead of the $0.18.
And so that bridge you from where you're looking at the -- from the unrealized. I was just giving you a little more information to help you bridge from the unrealized to the NAV.
And then just a follow-up. So you do, I guess, have now all this additional capital on hand. But I was just wondering like what is, I guess, the environment like for you to be able to deploy that capital? Like how aggressive do you think you'll be able to be? Are the quality of deals that you're seeing strong enough to allow you to be able to deploy that? If you can maybe just give a little bit of background on that.
Yes. Thanks for that question. This is Paul Seitz. So one is, I think the market is pretty active right now. It's pretty evidenced by the -- some of the larger funds moving down market in terms of the activity with the venture ecosystem, it's just getting -- it's picking up quite a bit. So our focus is to obviously deploy capital, but we need to be resilient and unrelenting on credit quality. And the way we structure our deals is critically important and the way we approach the risk-adjusted return profile of each company is critically important. So while it's active, we remain very diligent on structuring our deals and only doing the deals that are the highest of quality.
[Operator Instructions] Next, we'll move to Sean-Paul Adams with B. Riley.
It looks like you guys have actually had a pretty good quarter as far as credit quality. It looks like a good amount of non-accruals fell off the portfolio as well as your watch list also decreased. Can you provide a little bit of color on the remaining 2 names kind of on non-accrual? It looks like you guys actually experienced a write-up on Provivi. And just a little bit more color on how you're able to move so many names previously on non-accrual back to accrual.
So yes, we -- I guess if you look quarter-over-quarter on our schedule of investments, we had 3 names last quarter and 3 names this quarter. So they were Vesta, Provivi and [indiscernible]. For the previous quarter, Q3 to Q4, we were able to drop off some non-accruals and because we're able to work through some transaction and maximize those returns. And then this quarter related to Provivi, specifically and the change, like we say, we're working on each one of the deals, and we're trying to maximize returns. We were able to receive some paydown related to Provivi as we continue to work through that account.
There are no further questions at this time. I would like to turn the floor back to Mike Balkin for closing remarks.
Thank you all for joining us this morning. We appreciate your continued interest and support in Horizon, and we look forward to speaking with you again soon. This will conclude our call.
Thank you. This does conclude today's teleconference. We thank you for your participation. You may disconnect your lines at this time.
Horizon Technology Finance Corporation — Q4 2025 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Greetings. Welcome to the Horizon Technologies Finance Fourth Quarter 2021 Conference Call. At this time, mode. The question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. If anyone on your head. Please note this conference is being recorded. I'll now turn the conference over to Megan Bacon, Director of Investor Relations and Marketing. Megan, you may begin.
Thank you, and welcome to Horizon Technology Finance Corporation's Fourth Quarter 2025 Conference Call. Representing the company today are John Jacobs, Chief Executive Officer; Paul Seitz, Chief Investment Officer; and Dan Trolio, Chief Financial Officer. I would like to point out that the Q4 earnings press release and Form 10-K are available on the company's website at horizontechfinance.com.
Before we begin our formal remarks, I need to remind everyone that during this conference call, the company will make certain forward-looking statements, including statements with regard to the future performance of the company. Words such as believes, expects, The risk factor discussion in the company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025. The company undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
At this time, I would like to turn the call over to Horizon's CEO, Mike Balkin.
Welcome, everyone, and thank you for your interest in Horizon. Today, we will update you on our quarterly performance in the current operating environment. Paul Seitz, our Chief Investment Officer, will take us through recent business and portfolio developments as well as the current status of the venture lending market; and Dan Trolio, our Chief Financial Officer; will detail our operating performance, financial condition. We will then take questions.
2025 was a year of transformation for Horizon in many respects. While we navigated a number of micro and macro challenges throughout the year, we believe we began to successfully lay the groundwork for Horizon to succeed over the longer term. While the government shutdown in the fourth quarter led to our merger with MRCC being delayed into 2026, we are excited to be holding our special meeting shortly and hopefully closing the merger in the weeks ahead. As a reminder, closing the merger will significantly increase Horizon's equity capital available for investment in earning assets and allow it to take advantage of greater economies of scale in the combined vehicle.
Additionally, Monroe Capital, which is the parent company of Horizon Technology Finance Management, we'll be continuing to provide ongoing support to the post-merger company. As a result, we expect you will see an even more coordinated and synergistic effort between Monroe and Horizon in 2026, which is already evidenced by Horizon's first quarter co-investment with Monroe in a venture loan to [indiscernible]. With Horizon's larger capital base of Monroe's ability to co-invest we expect to originate larger venture loans to cutting-edge early and later-stage venture capital and institutional backed companies as well as small cap public companies. The merger working with Monroe and increasing our ability to fund larger transactions will allow us to bring the Horizon platform to the next level. I cannot be more excited for Horizon's future.
Turning to our specific results for the quarter. We generated net investment income of $0.18 per share, while our NAV per share ended the year at $6.98. Based on our outlook, our undistributed spillover income in the anticipated completion of our merger with MRCC, our Board declared regular monthly distributions of $0.06 per share payable in April, May and June of 2026. As we grow our portfolio in future quarters, it remains our goal to deliver NII at or above our declared distributions over time. We achieved a portfolio yield on debt investments of over 14% for the fourth quarter and nearly 16% for the full year 2025, once again at or near the top of the BDC industry.
We redeemed our notes due in 2026 with the proceeds of borrowing issuance of 7% notes due 2028. We finished the year with a committed and approved backlog of $154 million and our portfolio returned to growth in the fourth quarter. And finally, we are closing attractive venture debt investments while our pipeline of venture debt opportunities continues to grow. As we begin 2026, we remain excited for our long-term future growth given our numerous strengths, including our portfolio yield remains among the industry's highest, which we expect will lead to increased NII over time.
Our liquidity and balance sheet are strong and will further strengthen post-merger. We maintain a strong committed backlog, a robust pipeline. And with the backing of Monroe Capital, we are able to compete for larger higher-quality opportunities to make debt investments to growing companies which will grow our loan portfolio. And finally, the demand for venture debt capital remains high, and we expect to be a key supplier of such capital in the coming year and beyond.
Again, we appreciate your continued interest and support in the Horizon Technology Finance platform. I will now turn the call over to our Chief Investment Officer, Paul Seitz to give you the details of our fourth quarter results and progress. Paul?
Thanks, Mike, and good morning to everyone. As Mike noted, we are preparing for next week's special meeting, which if shareholders approve the proposal to issue more shares will allow us to close the merger with MRCC. If approved and closed, Horizon will have the additional size and scale to originate larger venture loans to growing public and private small companies, which will enable us to grow our portfolio and NII over time. We remain very excited to do so.
At the end of the year, our current portfolio stood at $647 million as we return to growth. In the fourth quarter, we funded 9 debt investments totaling $103 million, including 2 refinancings of our existing investments. We also continue to make progress in building our pipeline, including larger venture loan opportunities in our target sectors. Two of our pipeline opportunities, [ Celtis and Osio ], have already closed in 2026. In Q4, we increased our committed backlog by $35 million from the end of Q3, which positions us well to further grow our portfolio in the quarters ahead.
In Q1, we expect to further grow our portfolio, driven by our current pipeline, along with the venture loans, which have already closed since the end of the year, we have been awarded 2 new venture loans transactions representing $82.5 million in total commitments. It goes without saying that we will always be disciplined in originating and underwriting new loans. During the fourth quarter, we experienced 1 loan prepayment and 2 refinancings, totaling $43 million in prepaid principal and collected approximately $1 million in warrant proceeds.
Our onboarding debt investment yield of 12% during the fourth quarter remained consistent with our historic levels. We expect to continue to generate strong onboarding yields with our current pipeline of opportunities, which we believe will generate strong net investment income over time. Our debt portfolio yield of 14.3% for the quarter was once again among the highest yielding debt portfolios in the BDC industry despite the lower level of prepayments in the quarter. Our ability to generate industry-leading yields continues to be a testament to our venture lending strategy and our execution of such strategy across various market cycles and interest rate environments.
As of December 31, we held warrants, equity and other investments in 97 portfolio companies with a fair value of $51 million, structuring investments with warrants and equity rights is a key component of our venture debt strategy and potential generator of shareholder value. As mentioned, we ended the year with a committed improved backlog of $154 million compared to $119 million at the end of the third quarter. We believe our pipeline of investment opportunities, combined with our committed backlog, with most of our funding commitments subject to companies achieving certain key milestones provides a solid base to prudently grow our portfolio over time. As of year-end, 87% of the fair value of our debt portfolio consisted of 3 and 4 rated debt investments, while 13% of the fair value of our portfolio was rated 2 or 1, consistent with our levels at the end of the third quarter. We continue to collaborate with all of our portfolio companies and utilizing a variety of strategies to optimize returns and create future value.
Turning to the venture capital environment. According to PitchBook, approximately $92 billion was invested in VC-backed companies in the fourth quarter, driven again in significant part by continued large investments in AI. At $339 billion of investment, 2025 was the largest year of investment since the record year 2021 and a positive sign that investment activity has sufficiently recovered from 2023 and 2024. Exit markets remained opened, though slow in the fourth quarter with approximately $100 million of exit value driven primarily by tech IPOs. While the M&A market appears to be healthy and the IPO market is open, given the performance of many second half 2025 IPOs, investors and bankers may be more circumspect in bringing companies public in 2026. The life science IPO market remains limited, creating more opportunity for venture loan originations as evidenced by our loans to [ Pelos ] and Osio. In terms of tech, there remains considerable optimism, and we continue to be doing deep due diligence, particularly in AI and defense technology to determine the best types of opportunities for future investments.
We want to take a moment to make a few comments about AI. First, note Monroe Capital published a white paper on AI on February 6 of this year, which we believe summarizes our current view on AI and the tech sector. It's obvious to us that AI is changing the game and AI-related risk has been a central focus in our underwriting process. We believe the claim that the days of enterprise software are over are inflating the risk. And at the same time, those who claim is business as usual are underestimating the risk. Given Horizon and Monroe's track record and software investing, we are confident we can navigate this changing environment.
As we progress through 2026, we believe venture debt remains a compelling option for companies to access capital with lower dilution to their investors as companies continue to grow and prepare for exits. This compelling option provides significant opportunities for Horizon to seek high-quality well-sponsored tech and life science companies to add to its portfolio.
To sum up, while 2025 was a challenging year, we have made significant strides to succeed in both 2026 and for the long term. If and when we closed the merger, we will have an even greater capacity to target larger venture loan opportunities for both private and small cap public companies. Additionally, we will continue to work diligently on optimizing outcomes with respect to our current portfolio. We are confident that we are on the right path to expand our portfolio over the longer term and remain a leader in the venture lending space. We expect this will lead to increased NII over time and ultimately, additional value for shareholders.
With that, I will now turn the call over to our Chief Financial Officer, Dan Trolio.
Thanks, Paul, and good morning, everyone. There are a significant number of positive developments in 2025 for Horizon, namely our impending merger with Monroe Capital Corp. and our continued ability to strengthen our balance sheet despite the challenging environment. Our actions demonstrate our continued ability to opportunistically access the debt and equity markets. In addition, we continue to diligently work with all of our portfolio companies to optimize outcomes for our investments and improve our credit quality. As such, we believe we remain well positioned to grow our portfolio in the coming quarters and create additional value for our shareholders moving forward.
To recap 2025, we further strengthened our capacity in May by increasing the commitment under our senior secured credit facility with Nuveen to $200 million. In September, we raised $40 million of debt capital through the issuance of our 5.5% unsecured convertible notes due 2030, and use the proceeds to retire our Horizon Funding Trust asset-backed notes which had an interest rate of just over 7.5%. In December, we raised $57.5 million of debt capital through the issuance of our 7% unsecured notes due 2028, and used the proceeds in January 2026 to redeem our 26 public notes. Finally, we successfully and accretively raised over $14 million through our ATM program during the year, further demonstrating our continued ability to opportunistically access the equity markets.
As of December 31, we had $189 million in available liquidity, consisting of $143 million in cash and $46 million in funds available to be drawn under our existing credit facilities. We currently have no borrowings outstanding under our $150 million KeyBanc credit facility, $181 million outstanding on our $250 million New York Life credit facility, and $90 million outstanding on our $200 million Nuveen credit facility, leaving us with ample capacity to grow our portfolio of debt investments. Our debt-to-equity ratio stood at 1.5:1 as of December 31. And netting out cash on our balance sheet, our net leverage was 1.05:1, below our target leverage. Based on our cash position and our borrowing capacity on our credit facilities, our potential new investment capacity as of December 31 was $472 million.
Turning to our operating results. For the fourth quarter, we earned investment income of $21 million compared to $24 million in the prior year period, primarily due to lower interest income on our debt investment portfolio. Our debt investment portfolio on a net cost basis stood at $602 million as of December 31, up 3% compared to $585 million as of September 30, 2025. For the fourth quarter of '25, we achieved onboarding yields of 12% compared to 12.2% achieved in the third quarter of 2025. Our loan portfolio yield was 14.3% for the fourth quarter compared to 14.9% for last year's fourth quarter.
Total expenses for the quarter were $12.5 million compared to $12.8 million in the fourth quarter of '24. Our interest expense of $8 million was $0.2 million lower than last year's fourth quarter, while our base management fee was $2.9 million, $0.2 million lower than the prior year period due to our smaller portfolio. We received no performance-based incentive fees in the fourth quarter as we continue to defer incentive fees otherwise earned by our adviser under our incentive fee cap deferral mechanism. While we expect that the adviser will return to earning incentive fees. As a reminder, our advisor has agreed to waive up to $4 million of fees or $1 million a quarter if the merger is completed.
Net investment income for the fourth quarter of '25 was $0.18 per share compared to $0.32 per share in the third quarter of '25 and $0.27 per share for the fourth quarter of '24. Prepayment activity and the income that is typically associated with prepayments was lower than our historical experience. We continue to expect repayment activity will remain modest in the near term. For the full year '25, we generated NII of $1.05 per share. The company's undistributed spillover income as of December 31 was $0.65 per share. Based upon our outlook, undistributed spillover income and the anticipated completion of our merger with MRCC, our Board declared monthly distributions of $0.06 per share for April, May and June 2026. We anticipate that the size of our portfolio, our expectations for growth and our predictive pricing strategy will enable us to generate NII that covers our distribution over time.
To summarize our portfolio activities for the fourth quarter, new originations totaled $103 million, which were offset by $13 million in scheduled principal payments and $50 million in principal prepayments, refinancing and partial paydowns. We ended the year with a total investment portfolio of $647 million. At December 31, the portfolio consisted of debt investments in 38 companies, with an aggregate fair value of $596 million and a portfolio of warrant, equity and other investments in 97 companies with an aggregate fair value of $51 million.
Our NAV as of December 31 was $6.98 per share compared to $7.12 as of September 30, 2025, and $8.43 as of December 31, 2024. The $0.14 reduction in NAV on a quarterly basis was primarily due to our paid distributions exceeding our NII. As we've consistently noted, nearly 100% of the outstanding principal amount of our debt investments bear interest at floating rates. All those investments, approximately 71% are already at their interest rate floors, which should mitigate the impact of decreasing interest rates.
This concludes our opening remarks. We'll be happy to take questions you may have at this time.
[Operator Instructions] And our first question is from the line of Michael Brown with UBS.
2. Question Answer
This is Cory Johnson on for Mike. I was just wondering, can you maybe go into a little bit more about like how you decided on the new dividend level, kind of what was the decision-making around that?
Yes. Cory, as we say every quarter, we review our distribution level with the Board. We look at the current portfolio and the run rate. We look at the spillover. We look at our pipeline and our growth opportunities and determine based on that, a level that we think is sustainable and what we can cover over time.
Great. And then also just a quick follow-up. If I heard this correctly. Did you say the percent at the contractual floor is 71% was that?
That is correct. Yes.
[Operator Instructions] The next question is from the line of Paul Johnson with KBW.
I was just wondering if you could just kind of help me understand here a little bit more just the earnings here a quarter over quarter, because the portfolio yield of 14% with a roughly 10% ROE, just something doesn't really fit there. And I'm just wondering, aside I guess, payment lower prepayment income. I mean what kind of drove, I guess, the lower interest income? I guess, if that was the driver during the quarter because you're not earning incentive fees there was net portfolio growth in the quarter. The portfolio was roughly flat in terms of losses. So it doesn't seem like there was much depreciation in there. I was just wondering if we can just understand maybe the earnings bridge a little bit and maybe we could expect that this is maybe somewhat of a trough and we could potentially see a little bit more.
Yes. So Paul, all those things you stated were correct. Quarter-over-quarter, we grew the portfolio, you're right, the net realized unrealized for the quarter was flat. And so there's positive movement in the quarter. Most of the fundings were towards the end of the quarter. So that had some impact. And really, the major impact when you're looking quarter-over-quarter, was the prepayment and the activity that occurred each quarter. We had some significant prepayments, refinancing on a couple of names in Q3. And then in Q4, we really had 1 prepayment, a couple of opportunistic refinancing that we did with our own portfolio companies that had a lower income level than we typically receive on prepayments. And so when you add up the timing and the lower prepayment rates and the income related to that, that kind of connects the difference between the NII.
Okay. Got it. So if I'm just thinking about the $102 million of originations this quarter, that includes a number of refinancing within the portfolio, where, I guess, the return is structurally lower somehow?
So the -- yes, it included a couple of refinancing. They're positive in the event where we accelerate fee income on the previous already outstanding debt investments, and we're able to re-up with a full new fully loaded fee new debt investment was just lower income related to a prepayment where we'll receive a prepayment fee, but with refinancing, that's 1 of the fees that we don't get.
Okay. Got it. And then my other question was just on the opportunity for public company financing. Are those opportunities where you're refinancing or taking out existing debt? Or is this more of an opportunity we're providing new capital to those companies.
Paul, thanks for the question. It can be a combination of all of the above. But I think the opportunities we're seeing in the market and they are a significant number is that many of these companies don't even realize there's an opportunity to use debt capital like ours, where they can't go to a bank because maybe they're not profitable today or what have you. So in many cases, they will issue equity, which is much more dilutive. So what we are offering out to these companies is a more flexible capital structure that's less dilutive and gives the company an opportunity to have some growth capital here. So we believe this is a very fertile market for us. And again, the opportunity set is fairly wide.
Our next question is from the line of Sean-Paul Adams with B. Riley.
It looks like you guys had an aggregate decline in nonaccruals quarter-over-quarter. Can you just provide a little bit more color on the status of those 3 remaining 3 portfolio companies on nonaccruals.
Yes. What we say each quarter, we're working each 1 of those nonaccruals and they're all at various levels. We're trying to maximize the recovery with each 1 of them. And as you pointed out, we were able to improve the percentage of nonaccruals quarter-over-quarter. But besides that, we can't really get into too much detail with -- as these are private companies.
Got it. I appreciate it. Well, on the actual decline from the 4 to the 3, can you provide a little bit more detail on that 1 that came off?
Again, it's a private company, where we can't -- beside giving names. It was just a deal that we were working on acquisition last quarter that was completed this quarter, and we received the amount of our fair value. And so there is no NAV impact.
The next question is from the line of Christopher Nolan with Ladenburg Thalmann.
Was the driver of the realized loss exits from [ Telix ] Therapeutics?
[ Telix ] was a percentage of that, but talk was a small position -- and again, the realized loss were realized this quarter at the fair value that we had them going into the quarter. As you can see, Q4 net realized unrealized was slightly positive.
No, totally understand that. I'm just trying to understand what was the drivers of the realized loss?
Yes, it's Telix was a small piece of that. And we usually don't give detail on these private companies and how we've worked out each 1 of them.
Okay. In the earnings release and highlight in subsequent events, you guys are redeeming some of your 4.875% 2026 notes. How much of that has been redeemed, please?
The full amount was redeemed in January.
Great. And then I guess on the new dividend, am I correct that when the deal was announced, management is indicating that they're going to try to support the $0.33 dividend through 2026? Or am I mistaken there?
Support it in which way we've agreed to have the adviser agreed to waive $4 million of fees for the 4 quarters following the close at $1 million a quarter. Outside of that, and then we have the repurchase program that we have in place that will support the shares.
Great. Final question. Should we look at the new dividend as a reasonable earnings run rate for the company? And does that assume elevated nonaccruals?
So as we say, we review the distribution level with our Board, we set it at a level that we believe we're going to cover over time. And so that's what we did.
The next question is a follow-up from the line of Paul Johnson with KBW.
Just one more. Can I just clarify, so on the convertible conversion this quarter, what was the conversion rate there? And I guess, is there any kind of dilutive impact in the first quarter from that.
The conversions for the converts that we have done are all at NAV. They're required to be converted at NAV. And so in the fourth quarter, the 8.5% that has been converted. And any time it does convert, it will be at the stated NAV at that time. So there's no dilution.
Thank you. At this time, we've reached the end of our question-and-answer session. I'll hand the floor back to Mike for closing remarks.
Thank you. Thank you all for joining us this morning. We appreciate your continued interest and support in Horizon, and we look forward to speaking with you again soon. This will conclude our call.
Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect your lines at this time, and have a wonderful day.
Horizon Technology Finance Corporation — Q4 2025 Earnings Call
Horizon Technology Finance Corporation — Q3 2025 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Ladies and gentlemen, greetings, and welcome to the Horizon Technology Finance Corporation Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host for today, Megan Bacon. Please go ahead.
Thank you, and welcome to Horizon Technology Finance Corporation's Third Quarter 2025 Conference Call. Representing the company today are Mike Balkin, Chief Executive Officer; Paul Seitz, Chief Investment Officer; and Dan Trolio, Chief Financial Officer. I would like to point out that the Q3 earnings press release and Form 10-Q are available on the company's website at horizontechfinance.com.
Before we begin our formal remarks, I need to remind everyone that during this conference call, the company will make certain forward-looking statements, including statements with regard to the future performance of the company. Words such as believes, expects, anticipates, intends or similar expressions are used to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to the inherent uncertainties in predicting future results and conditions.
Certain factors could cause actual results to differ on a material basis from those projected in these forward-looking statements. And some of these factors are detailed in the risk factor discussion in the company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024. The company undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
At this time, I would like to turn the call over to Mike Balkin.
Thanks, Megan, and welcome, everyone, and thank you for your interest in Horizon. Today, we will update you on our quarterly performance in the current operating environment. Paul Seitz will take us through recent business and portfolio developments as well as the current status of the venture lending market, and Dan Trolio will detail our operating performance and financial condition. We will then take questions.
Well, it has been a very active several months since I assumed the CEO role in June. I spent countless hours with our team together thinking about the next chapter of Horizon and how best to expand the Horizon platform moving forward.
The first part of that strategy came to fruition when we announced in August, that MRCC and HRZN will be merging in a NAV-for-NAV share exchange, subject to shareholder approval and customary closing conditions. The merger is progressing. But due to the federal government shutdown, we now expect to complete it in early 2026.
Upon closing, Horizon will significantly increase their assets under management, while MRCC shareholders will have the opportunity to participate in what we expect to be a rapidly growing BDC that will be able to take advantage of greater economies of scale in the combined vehicle.
Importantly, Monroe Capital, which is the parent company of Horizon Technology Finance Management, will provide additional and ongoing support to the post-merger company. As a result, you will see a much more coordinated and synergistic effort in 2026 as we expect to take significant advantage of having such a premier asset manager and expert private credit lender providing us with stalwart backing.
To that end, we added several new originators in the third quarter, who are hitting the ground running. With our reinforced team combined with Monroe's support, we expect to compete to originate larger venture loans to top early stage of late-stage cutting-edge companies and return to the growth trajectory that we've historically experienced.
I could not be more excited for Horizon's future. And while there is still plenty of work to be done, we have the right team in place to bring the Horizon platform to the next level.
Turning to our specific results for the quarter, we generated net investment income of $0.32 per share. As we look to grow our portfolio in future quarters, it remains our goal to deliver NII at or above our declared distributions over time.
Thanks in part to our accretive acquisition of venture debt portfolio of a former co-lender as well as achieving favorable outcomes with two of our challenged portfolio companies, our NAV per share grew 5% to $7.12. Based on our outlook and our undistributed spillover income, our Board declared regular monthly distributions of $0.11 per share through March 2026.
Once again, we achieved a portfolio yield on debt investments at or near the top of the BDC industry. We also further strengthened our balance sheet in the quarter by accretively raising equity from our at-the-market program and successfully raised $40 million through the issuance of our 5.5% unsecured convertible notes due 2030.
And through our more active relationship with Monroe Capital, our pipeline of larger potential venture debt transactions is growing, while we maintain a solid base of additional opportunities to grow our portfolio over time.
Before handing the call over to Paul, we are very excited for the new Horizon's long-term future and believe we have the right building blocks in place to execute, namely our portfolio yield remains among the industry's highest, which we expect will lead to increased NII over time. Our liquidity and balance sheet continue to remain strong and will further strengthen the post-merger.
We maintain a strong committed backlog, a robust pipeline, and we believe that the vacuum Monroe Capital that we are in a great position to compete for even larger, higher-quality opportunities to invest in new companies. We are already seeing the aperture widening as more private and public companies express interest in our venture lending solutions.
And finally, the demand for venture debt capital remains high. We look forward to being a key supplier of such capital. Again, we appreciate your continued interest and support in the Horizon Technology Finance platform.
I will now turn the call over to our Chief Investment Officer, Paul Seitz, to give you the details of our third quarter results and progress. Paul?
Thanks, Mike, and good morning to everyone. I'm happy to join today's call and look forward to speaking to you all in the quarters to come. It's an exciting time here at Horizon. While we continue to work closely with all of our current portfolio companies to optimize returns and create further opportunities for additional value creation, we are very enthusiastic about our future.
As Mike mentioned, we believe the combined company will provide us with the size and scale needed to originate larger venture loans to growing public and private small companies.
At the end of the quarter, our current portfolio stood at $603 million as the loans we originated and acquired during the quarter were offset by prepayments and amortization in our existing portfolio.
In the third quarter, we funded 3 debt investments totaling $15 million. Positively, we are making strong progress on building up our pipeline with larger venture loan opportunities in our target sectors, and we are positioning ourselves well to return to growing our portfolio.
Looking ahead to Q4, we expect to grow our portfolio in the quarter driven by our pipeline. Thus far in October, we have already funded a $10 million venture loan transaction and have been awarded 3 new venture loan transactions representing $50 million in total commitments, with much of that total to potentially fund in Q4. That said, we will always be disciplined in our approach to originating loans.
During the third quarter, we experienced 6 loan prepayments totaling $50 million in prepaid principal and also collected over $3 million in equity and warrant proceeds. We currently expect more limited prepayment activity in Q4.
Our onboarding debt investment yield of 12.2% during the third quarter remained consistent with our historic levels. We expect to continue to generate strong onboarding yields with our current pipeline of opportunities, which we believe will generate strong net investment income over time. Our debt portfolio yield of 18.6% for the quarter was, once again, one of the highest yielding debt portfolios in the BDC industry.
Our ability to generate these industry-leading yields continues to be a testament to our venture lending strategy and our execution of such strategy across various market cycles and interest rate environments.
As of September 30, we held more equity positions in 95 portfolio companies with a fair value of $40 million. Structuring investments with warrants and equity rights is a key component of our venture debt strategy and a potential generator of shareholder value.
We ended the third quarter with a committed and approved backlog of $119 million compared to $149 million at the end of the second quarter. We believe our pipeline, combined with our committed backlog, with most of our funding commitments subject to companies achieving certain key milestones; provides a solid base to prudently grow our portfolio over time.
As of quarter end, 87% of the fair value of our debt portfolio consisted of 3 and 4 rated debt investments, while 13% of the fair value of our portfolio was rated 2 or 1.
While we continue to collaborate with all of our portfolio companies to optimize returns, we are pleased in the quarter to achieve two strong outcomes on stress investments, namely Soli and Hound Labs. These had a positive impact on both NII and NAV. This is a demonstration of our proven ability to utilize a variety of strategies to seek to optimize returns and create opportunities for potential future value.
Turning to the venture capital environment, according to PitchBook, the market is warming up with approximately $81 billion invested in VC-backed companies in the third quarter, driven in significant part by continued large investments in AI. On the positive side, we saw exit markets further open in the third quarter with approximately $75 billion of exit value, driven primarily by tech IPOs.
Along with acquisitions by VC-backed companies, the IPO market is once again opened and investors clearly are eager to put their money to work.
In life sciences, while there is optimism, there remain valuation disconnects and compression, which is keeping a relative lid on potential IPOs in that sector. Meanwhile, on the tech side, there is considerable optimism and we are being very thoughtful about taking a deeper dive into the various subsectors, particularly in AI and defense technology, to determine the best path for future investments.
Looking ahead, venture debt remains a significant option for companies to access capital as they continue to grow and prepare for exits. This provides opportunity for Horizon to seek high-quality, well-sponsored tech and life science companies to add to its portfolio.
To sum up, as we close out 2025, we are increasingly excited for our long-term future as we prepare to merge with MRCC. Our alignment with Monroe is increasing, and we are truly beginning to tap into Monroe as an incredible resource, which should significantly benefit us as we target larger venture loan opportunities for both public and private companies. Additionally, we will continue to work diligently on optimizing outcomes with respect to our current portfolio.
We are confident that we are taking the right steps to continue to be a leader in the venture lending space. These steps will enable us to originate larger venture loans to high-quality, fast-growing public and private companies and expand our portfolio over the longer term. This should lead to increased NII over time and ultimately, additional value for shareholders.
With that, I will now turn the call over to our Chief Financial Officer, Dan Trolio.
Thanks, Paul, and good morning, everyone, Along with the hard work being accomplished to get the merger across the finish line as well as build up our originations pipeline, we further strengthened our balance sheet during the quarter.
As Mike mentioned, we successfully raised $40 million through the issuance of our 5.5% convertible notes due 2030 and used the proceeds to retire our Horizon funding trust, asset-backed notes, which had an interest rate of just over 7.5%. Additionally, we continue to utilize our ATM program to successfully and accretively sell over 1.5 million shares in the quarter, raising an additional $10 million of equity.
These actions demonstrate our continued ability to opportunistically access the debt and equity markets. In addition, we continue to diligently work with all of our portfolio companies to optimize outcomes for our investments and improve our credit quality. As such, we believe we remain well positioned to grow our portfolio in the coming quarters and create additional value for our shareholders moving forward.
As of September 30, we had $151 million in available liquidity, consisting of $130 million in cash and $21 million in funds available to be drawn under our existing credit facilities. We currently have no borrowings outstanding under our $150 million KeyBanc credit facility, $181 million outstanding on our $250 million New York Life credit facility and $90 million outstanding on our $200 million Nuveen credit facility, leaving us with ample capacity to grow our portfolio of debt investments.
Our net equity ratio stood at 1.36:1 as of September 30. And and netting out cash on our balance sheet, our net leverage was 0.94:1, below our target leverage. Based on our cash position and our borrowing capacity on our credit facilities, our potential new investment capacity as of September 30 was $460 million.
Turning to our operating results. For the third quarter, we earned investment income of $26 million compared to $25 million in the prior-year period, primarily due to higher interest income and fee income on our debt investment portfolio. Our net investment portfolio on a net cost basis stood at $585 million as of September 30 compared to $636 million as of June 30, 2025.
For the third quarter of 2025, we achieved onboarding yields of 12.2% compared to 12% achieved in the second quarter of 2025. Our loan portfolio yield was 18.6% for the third quarter compared to 15.9% for last year's third quarter.
Total expenses for the quarter were $12 million, compared to $12.4 million in the third quarter of '24. Our interest expense of $7.9 million was comparable to last year's third quarter, while our base management fee was $2.7 million, $0.2 million lower than our prior-year period due to a smaller portfolio.
We received no performance-based incentive fees in the third quarter as we continue to experience the deferral of incentive fees otherwise earned by our adviser under our incentive fee cap and deferral mechanism. While we expect that the adviser will return to earning incentive fees, as we previously mentioned, the adviser has agreed to waive a portion of any incentive fee in a quarter where we do not earn our distributions in 2025.
Net investment income for the third quarter of '25 was $0.32 per share compared to $0.28 per share in the second quarter of '25 and $0.32 per share for the third quarter of 24%. The company's undistributed spillover income as of September 30 was $0.93 per share. Based upon our outlook and undistributed spillover income, our Board declared monthly distributions of $0.11 per share for January, February and March 2026.
To summarize our portfolio activities for the quarter, new originations totaled $15 million, and we also purchased for $23 million additional investments via the acquisition of the venture debt portfolio of a former co-lender. These were offset by $14 million in scheduled principal payments and $61 million in principal prepayments and partial paydowns. We ended the quarter with a total investment portfolio of $603 million.
As of September 30, the portfolio consisted of debt investments and 39 companies with a negative fair value of $560 million in a portfolio of warrant, equity and other investments in 102 companies with an aggregate fair value of $43 million.
Our NAV as of September 30 was $7.12 per share compared to $6.75 as of June 30, 2025 and $9.06 as of September 30, 2024. The $0.37 increase in NAV on a quarterly basis was primarily due to net investment income and positive adjustments to fair value, partially offset by our paid distributions.
As we've consistently noted, nearly 100% of our outstanding principal amount of our debt investments bear interest at floating rates. Of those investments, almost 60% are already at their interest rate floors, which should mitigate the impact of decreasing interest rates.
This concludes our opening remarks. We'll be happy to take questions you may have at this time.
[Operator Instructions] The first question comes from Douglas Harter with UBS.
2. Question Answer
This is Cory Johnson on for Doug Harter. So it sounds like the VC market is heating up and there are more exits out there in the market. And early payoffs have been strong for the last 2 quarters, but I believe you mentioned that for 4Q, that those payoffs might be a little bit more limited.
I guess, what do you expect that trend to be going forward maybe into 2026? And is it related to the government shutdown where we think that perhaps the 4Q payouts might be a little bit more limited?
Yes, this is Paul Seitz. I don't think that the government shutdown necessarily is going to impact any payoffs or prepayments or anything like that. I would say that it was a little bit higher this quarter, but we expect probably our payoffs and early prepayments to revert to any sort of historical standard.
The exit markets are heating up, which is a good thing. But I think it's, right now, in just sort of a little bit of a wait-and-see period.
Got it. And during the quarter, the net leverage -- your net leverage came down. Curious, are you seeing -- I know you mentioned that you think your portfolio will grow next quarter, and you're starting to see more deals come across your table.
But I was just sort of curious in terms of like now that you are seeing more deals, what is sort of the credit quality behind them? Are there names that you like? Or are you just more name that you seem to be -- you're looking to pass on?
And then obviously, it's a little bit difficult to exactly figure out the trajectory of your -- where the leverage will go. But how long do you think it might be before you perhaps reach your target leverage again?
Yes. So as we say every quarter, our target leverage is around 1.2 to 1.3x net of cash. This quarter, it did come down a bit, where we're at 0.94:1. So as we talked where -- in our prepared remarks that the pipeline is growing in originations, we expect originations to exceed prepayments going forward. And so I think when we look at the leverage, we should be getting back to that 1.2, 1.3x over the next quarter or 2.
[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Paul Johnson with KBW.
Just on the portfolio yield or just the portfolio yield in general, it sounds like you're pretty confident about the onboarding yields coming in. But obviously, the income has been running higher, some onetime items just running higher with prepayments.
I mean the 18.9% yield, I mean, how should we be thinking about that? Is that sustainable going forward? Or what's kind of like the longer-term sort of target, I guess, based on the same pipeline?
Yes. So I would point you to our historical portfolio yield, which we've averaged around 14.5% to 15%. That's a more normalized yield. And then I'll just point out, that is a portfolio yield after prepayments and onetime events. And as we mentioned, the onboarding yield has been about 12%, 12.5% for the past few quarters and probably most likely be around that going forward.
Got it. Okay. That's helpful. And then maybe you could just take us through the debt portfolio that you acquired during the quarter, kind of what transpired there? It looks like you were able to buy at a potentially a discount to where, I guess, had previously been marked. But anything -- any color on that would be helpful to hear.
Yes, correct. We were able to acquire a venture debt portfolio from one of our co-lenders that we had created a [ sidecar ] fund, SMA back in 2021 with a $300 million total commitment. We were able to invest that completely. And so it was in runoff.
And then over the past year or so when there are fewer names remaining, we were working with that co-lender, names that, obviously, we've already invested in and negotiated a price. They were co-lender in venture debt, was their only venture debt portfolio and they were looking just to exit the market. And obviously, we're the natural buyer.
Got it. Okay. Interesting. And then maybe just it would be helpful here kind of what is -- as we get into next year and get beyond the fee waivers, like what is kind of the idea with spillover? It still looks like there's a decent amount of $0.93. But I mean, would you like to just continue to work that down potentially further before evaluating the distribution? Or is that something you'd like to kind of maintain?
Yes. So I'll just remind you, every quarter, we discussed the distribution and take into account the current income level and the future level of the Horizon platform and look at the spillover, and we'll determine the amount of distribution on a quarterly basis.
Our next question comes from Christopher Nolan with Ladenburg Thalmann.
Assuming the deal with MRCC closes, is the focus going to be on larger credits going forward? And what does that do to the yield?
That will be one of the benefits with a larger balance sheet. You can hold larger position and stay diversified as we focus on our top 1, top 5, top 10 diversification. But there will still be venture debt deals in the market that we have played in, we'll just be able to hold larger pieces of it. And so we don't expect the yields to change dramatically.
Great. Given the stock price is trading below book now, what's the plan on using the common stock ATM going forward?
Same plan as usual. We look at our originations pipeline, we look at our liquidity and our capacity and look to pull as many levers as possible to originate and grow the portfolio where we can. Obviously, we're trading below book. We won't be able to utilize the ATM.
Okay. And then given -- assuming the Monroe deal closes, you are going to have a much larger balance sheet, any consideration in terms of revisiting the base management fee? I know it is 2% for the first $250 million in assets. And then there's a breakpoint to 160 bps above $250 million. And even at 160 bps, you're sort of at the high end of the range for BDCs in general stay. Any comment on that?
Yes. So we have our normal 15-C process that we do on an annual basis, and we review all of our competitors. And when everybody calculates it different, has different hurdles and different percentages on a blended effective cost percentage; we are within the average of our peers. We look at it every year through that 15-C process, and we'll continue to do that going forward and make sure we're within market.
Great. And then any target ROE for the new assets coming on from Monroe?
We don't have any targeted new assets right now that are coming on. The Monroe platform will help us get access to larger assets and potentially some additional assets, but nothing specific today.
Yes. No, actually, I phrased it poorly. For the new capital coming in from the Monroe deal, what is the target ROE or return hurdle that you're looking for to get from that new capital?
It's basically stick to what we do, the venture debt model that has a high-yielding portfolio, and that will drive the ROE. We don't have a specific targeted ROE on that capital.
Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, as there are no further questions, I would now like to hand the conference over to Mike Balkin for the closing comments.
Thank you all for joining us this morning. We appreciate your continued interest and support in Horizon, and we look forward to speaking with you again soon. This will conclude our call.
Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, the conference of Horizon Technology Finance Corporation has now concluded. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect your lines.
Financial data from Horizon Technology Finance Corporation
Revenue
Revenue is the sum of all sales generated by a company, e.g. for its products or services.
Revenue (TTM) metric explainedDirect Costs
Direct costs are the costs incurred directly in connection with the manufacture of the product or service.
Gross Profit
Gross Profit indicates how much of the revenue remains in the company after deducting direct production costs. If the percentage share of sales is calculated, this is referred to as the gross margin.
Gross Profit metric explainedSelling and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) include all expenses for marketing and sales as well as the general administration of the company.
Research and Development Expense
Research and development costs (R&D) provide information on how much the company invests in the research and development of its products. The costs are particularly interesting as a percentage of revenue and in comparison to direct competitors.
EBITDA
EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization) is the company's earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. The EBITDA margin is calculated as a percentage of sales.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation represents reductions in the value of the company's assets (e.g. due to wear and tear on machinery).
EBIT (Operating Income)
EBIT (Earnings Before Interest and Taxes) is the company's profit before interest and taxes, also known as the operating income. The EBIT Margin is calculated as a percentage of sales at
.
Net Profit
Net Profit represents the profit or loss after deduction of all costs.
Net Profit metric explainedStocksGuide Premium
| Jun '26 |
+/-
%
|
||
| Revenue | 66 66 |
979%
979%
100%
|
|
| - Direct Costs | 50 50 |
2%
2%
76%
|
|
| Gross Profit | 16 16 |
136%
136%
24%
|
|
| - Selling and Administrative Expenses | 1.86 1.86 |
3%
3%
3%
|
|
| - Research and Development Expense | - - |
-
-
|
|
| EBITDA | - - |
-
-
|
|
| - Depreciation and Amortization | - - |
-
-
|
|
| EBIT (Operating Income) EBIT | 14 14 |
131%
131%
21%
|
|
| Net Profit | 5.07 5.07 |
111%
111%
8%
|
|
In millions USD.
Don't miss a Thing! We will send you all news about Horizon Technology Finance Corporation directly to your mailbox free of charge.
If you wish, we will send you an e-mail every morning with news on stocks of your portfolios.
Horizon Technology Finance Corporation Stock News
Company Profile
StocksGuide Premium
| Head office | United States |
| CEO | Mr. Balkin |
| Founded | 2010 |
| Website | horizontechfinance.com |


