Instalco Stock price
Compare with Peer Group
📊 Peer Group
📈 What is it?
The peer group consists of the companies with the most similar business model. They serve as a benchmark for putting a stock into context.
🧮 How is it selected?
Based on similarity of business model, meaning companies from the same industry with comparable products and a similar customer base. That's the only way to compare apples to apples.
🏛️ Why does it matter?
Whether a stock is cheap or expensive is best judged by comparison. A P/E of 18 or an EV/FCF of 20 can look cheap or expensive depending on the yardstick. The peer group gives you the most accurate one: companies with a similar business model that operate under the same conditions.
🎯 What does it mean for investors?
When a metric sits below the peer average, the stock is valued more cheaply relative to its competitors, and above the average more expensively. A discount to the peer group can be an opportunity, but it can also have a reason (for example lower growth). The comparison is a starting point, not a verdict.
Is Instalco a Top Scorer Stock based on the Dividend, High-Growth-Investing or Leverman Strategy?
As a Free StocksGuide user, you can view scores for all 9,127 stocks worldwide.
StocksGuide Premium
StocksGuide Unlimited
Key metrics
📘 Market Capitalization
📈 What is it?
Market capitalization shows how much a company is currently worth on the stock market.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It helps classify companies by size (Large, Mid, Small Cap) and indicates their market presence and relative stability.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Large-cap companies tend to be more stable, often pay dividends, but may grow more slowly.
- Smaller firms may offer higher growth potential but come with more volatility.
- Market capitalization is a useful indicator of company size — but not a measure of whether a stock is undervalued or overvalued.
📘 Enterprise Value (EV)
📈 What is it?
Enterprise Value represents the total cost to acquire a company — including its debt and excluding its cash reserves.
🧮 How is it calculated?
(= Market Cap + Net Debt)
🏛️ Why is it important?
EV gives a more complete picture of a company's value than market cap alone and is used in key valuation ratios like EV/FCF or EV/Sales.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Enterprise Value shows the true cost of buying a company, including all financial obligations.
- It is more accurate than just looking at market cap, especially when comparing companies with different levels of debt or cash.
- Professional investors prefer EV-based multiples because they better reflect the company’s full financial footprint.
📘 Net Debt
📈 What is it?
Net Debt shows how much debt remains after subtracting a company’s available cash reserves.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It indicates how dependent a company is on borrowed money and how easily it can service its debt in the short term.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Low or negative net debt signals financial strength and flexibility.
- Companies with strong cash positions are better positioned in crises.
- High net debt increases financial risk — especially in environments with rising interest rates or economic downturns.
📘 Cash
📈 What is it?
Cash represents all liquid assets a company can access immediately — including cash, bank deposits, and short-term investments.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It reflects a company’s financial flexibility and resilience — enabling investments, buybacks, or buffer in downturns.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A strong cash position means greater room for maneuver and crisis resistance.
- Cash-rich companies can invest, pay down debt, or repurchase shares.
- But excess idle cash might indicate a lack of growth opportunities.
📘 Shares Outstanding
📈 What is it?
Shares outstanding represent the total number of a company’s shares currently held by investors — excluding treasury stock.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It’s the basis for key metrics like Earnings Per Share (EPS), Market Capitalization, or the Price/Earnings ratio (P/E).
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Fewer shares in circulation typically increase earnings per share — making each share more valuable.
- Share buybacks reduce the number of shares and boost per-share metrics.
- Issuing new shares does the opposite — diluting shareholder value and lowering per-share figures.
📘 Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E)
📈 What is it?
The P/E ratio shows how many times a company's earnings per share are reflected in its current share price — in other words, how "expensive" the stock appears relative to its profits.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
The P/E ratio is one of the most widely used valuation metrics. It helps investors assess whether a stock appears cheap or expensive compared to its earnings power.
🧮 Calculation
📊 P/E (TTM) = Based on earnings from the last 12 months (Trailing Twelve Months):🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low P/E may indicate undervaluation — or signal underlying issues.
- A high P/E may reflect strong growth expectations — or an overvalued stock.
📘 Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S)
📈 What is it?
The P/S ratio shows how much investors are paying for $1 of the company’s revenue – regardless of profitability.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
P/S is especially useful for evaluating growth companies or businesses not yet profitable. It reflects how the market values the company’s sales.
🧮 Calculation
Market Cap = kr11.01b | Revenue (TTM) = kr14.11b
Market Cap = kr11.01b | Estimated Revenue = kr15.28b
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low P/S may indicate undervaluation — or low profitability.
- A high P/S can reflect strong growth expectations — or excessive optimism.
- Especially helpful when evaluating companies where profits are low, volatile, or negative.
📘 Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales)
📈 What is it?
EV/Sales shows how much investors are paying for $1 of revenue — considering not just equity, but also debt and cash. It’s the capital structure–adjusted version of the P/S ratio.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It’s ideal for comparing companies with different levels of debt. It reflects a company's true cost relative to its revenue.
🧮 Calculation
Enterprise Value = kr14.88b | Revenue (TTM) = kr14.11b
Enterprise Value = kr14.88b | Forward Revenue = kr15.28b
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- EV/Sales allows for capital structure–neutral company comparisons.
- A lower ratio may indicate undervaluation; a higher one may signal strong growth expectations or overvaluation.
- Especially helpful when evaluating high-growth companies with low or negative earnings.
📘 Enterprise Value to Free Cash Flow (EV/FCF)
📈 What is it?
EV/FCF shows how many years it would take for a company to "pay back" its enterprise value using its free cash flow.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It focuses on real cash generation, ignoring accounting noise — ideal for assessing profitability and value based on liquidity, not earnings.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low EV/FCF may signal undervaluation and strong cash generation.
- A high EV/FCF might reflect weak recent cash flow or aggressive growth expectations.
- Best suited for stable, mature businesses with predictable free cash flows.
📘 Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B)
📈 What is it?
The P/B ratio compares a company’s market value to its book value — showing how much investors are paying for each dollar of net assets.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
P/B is commonly used for asset-heavy industries like banks or industrials. It helps assess whether a stock is trading above or below its net asset value.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A P/B below 1 may signal undervaluation — or weak profitability.
- A P/B above 1 implies the market expects future value creation (e.g., brand, IP, growth).
- Best used for companies with tangible assets and strong balance sheets.
📘 Dividend per Share (DPS)
📈 What is it?
Dividend per Share shows how much cash a company pays out to shareholders for each share they own – usually on an annual or quarterly basis.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
DPS is the absolute value of the payout per share – crucial for income-focused investors and dividend strategies.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A stable or growing DPS often signals a strong, shareholder-friendly business.
- DPS alone doesn’t tell you how attractive the payout is – the stock price also matters (→ see Dividend Yield).
- Long-term dividend growth is often a hallmark of high-quality companies – like the dividend aristocrats.
📘 Dividend Yield
📈 What is it?
Dividend yield shows how large a company’s dividend is in relation to its current share price.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It allows investors to compare dividend payouts across stocks, regardless of price or payout size.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A stable yield can reflect reliable distributions.
- Comparing 1Y and 5Y yield shows whether dividend growth keeps pace with stock price appreciation.
- A low yield isn’t always negative – it can signal strong past performance or growth focus.
📘 Dividend Growth
📈 What is it?
Dividend growth shows how much a company has increased its dividend per share over time.
🧮 How is it calculated?
5Y: Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR)
🏛️ Why is it important?
Consistently rising dividends are often a sign of financial strength and shareholder orientation – especially relevant for long-term investors.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Stable dividend growth is a sign of sustainable earning power.
- High dividend growth can significantly boost your total return:
- If a company pays $1 in dividends and increases it by 15% annually over 5 years, you’ll receive $2 per share in year 5 – twice as much as at the start!
📘 Payout Ratio
📈 What is it?
The payout ratio shows what percentage of a company’s earnings (per share) is distributed to shareholders as dividends.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It helps assess whether the dividend is sustainable – especially in relation to the company’s profitability.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low payout ratio means the company retains more earnings for reinvestment – typical for growth companies.
- A moderate payout (e.g. 25–50%) indicates a healthy balance between returns and reinvestment.
- High payout ratios may seem attractive but can carry risk if earnings decline.
📘 Consecutive Dividend Increases
📈 What is it?
This metric shows how many consecutive years a company has raised its dividend per share – without any cuts or pauses.
🧮 How is it calculated?
(Special dividends are not considered.)
🏛️ Why is it important?
A long track record of increases reflects financial strength, consistency, and shareholder commitment.
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A long dividend increase streak builds confidence – especially in volatile markets.
- Such companies are seen as reliable and income-friendly investments.
- The longer the streak, the stronger the company’s dividend discipline.
📘 Revenue
📈 What is it?
Revenue shows how much a company earns in total from selling its products and services – the gross income before any costs are deducted.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Revenue is one of the key figures to assess a company’s size, market position, and growth potential.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Growing revenue indicates rising demand and can be an early signal of future earnings growth.
- Comparing actual and expected revenue reveals trends in the market environment and analyst sentiment.
- Note: Strong revenue alone isn’t enough – margins and profitability matter just as much.
📘 EBITDA
📈 What is it?
EBITDA stands for “Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization.” It reflects a company’s operating profit before the effects of financing, taxes, and accounting depreciation.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
EBITDA is widely used to evaluate a company’s operating performance – especially across capital-intensive sectors or international comparisons.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high or growing EBITDA indicates strong operational profitability – independent of taxes, interest, or accounting methods.
- It’s especially useful for comparing companies across sectors or geographies.
- Important: EBITDA is not a net income figure – it excludes key costs like depreciation and interest.
📘 EBIT
📈 What is it?
EBIT stands for “Earnings Before Interest and Taxes.” It reflects a company’s operating profit after depreciation, but before interest and tax expenses.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
EBIT is a core profitability metric that shows how well the company performs in its main business operations – independent of capital structure and tax environment.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high EBIT indicates strong profitability from the company’s core business – before financial and tax effects.
- It allows better comparison between companies with different debt levels or tax structures.
- Compared to EBITDA, EBIT already accounts for depreciation and reflects capital intensity more clearly.
📘 Net Income
📈 What is it?
Net income is the company’s total profit – the amount left after all expenses, taxes, interest, and depreciation have been deducted.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Net income is the most comprehensive measure of a company’s profitability – showing how much actual profit remains after all business and financing costs.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Growing net income indicates that the company is managing all of its costs efficiently.
- It directly influences valuation metrics like P/E ratio and the company’s dividend capacity.
- Over time, net income trends reveal how resilient and profitable the business model really is.
📘 Free Cash Flow (FCF)
📈 What is it?
Free Cash Flow shows how much actual cash remains after a company covers its operating expenses and capital expenditures.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
FCF reflects a company’s real financial strength – regardless of accounting profits. It shows how much flexibility a company has for dividends, share buybacks, or debt reduction.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- High free cash flow means the company generates real, usable cash – independent of reported net income.
- It’s often the most reliable base for sustainable dividends and buybacks.
- Declining FCF can be an early warning sign – even when profits appear stable.
📘 Revenue Growth
📈 What is it?
Revenue growth shows how much a company’s sales have changed compared to the previous year – both on a trailing basis (TTM) and based on forward projections.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Forward = (Expected revenue ÷ Revenue in prior year − 1) × 100
Forward growth is based on analyst estimates for the current fiscal year.
🏛️ Why is it important?
Rising revenue signals growing demand, business expansion, and market share gains – especially important for growth-oriented companies.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Growth is the engine of long-term value creation – especially in tech and growth sectors.
- What matters is not just current growth, but its sustainability.
- Forward projections reflect whether analysts expect continued momentum – or a slowdown.
📘 EBITDA Growth
📈 What is it?
EBITDA growth shows how much a company’s operating profit (before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) has increased or decreased compared to the previous year.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Forward = (Expected EBITDA ÷ EBITDA from prior year − 1) × 100
The forward estimate is based on analyst projections for the current fiscal year.
🏛️ Why is it important?
Growing EBITDA indicates improving operational profitability – regardless of financing or accounting effects.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Strong EBITDA growth signals operational efficiency and scalability – especially during growth phases.
- EBITDA growth can be an early indicator of margin and earnings expansion – but should be assessed alongside revenue and EBIT.
📘 EBIT Growth
📈 What is it?
EBIT growth shows how much a company’s operating profit (after depreciation, but before interest and taxes) has increased compared to the previous year.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Forward = (Expected EBIT ÷ EBIT from prior year − 1) × 100
The forward estimate is based on analyst projections for the current fiscal year.
🏛️ Why is it important?
EBIT growth is a direct indicator of a company’s business performance – taking into account capital intensity through depreciation.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Rising EBIT signals improving operating profitability – even after accounting for depreciation.
- It’s especially important for evaluating companies with significant capital expenditures.
- Combined with revenue and EBITDA growth, EBIT growth provides a well-rounded view of operational progress.
📘 Net Income Growth
📈 What is it?
Net income growth shows how much a company’s bottom-line profit has increased or decreased compared to the previous year – both on a trailing basis (TTM) and based on analyst projections.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Forward = (Expected net income ÷ Net income from prior year − 1) × 100
The forward estimate reflects analysts’ expectations for the current fiscal year.
🏛️ Why is it important?
Net income is the ultimate measure of profitability. Growing net income signals stronger efficiency, cost control, and sustainable earnings power.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Stronger net income boosts valuation, dividend potential, and investor confidence.
- If profits stall while revenue grows, it may signal margin pressure.
📘 Free Cash Flow Growth
📈 What is it?
Free cash flow (FCF) growth shows how a company’s available cash – after covering operating expenses and capital expenditures – has changed compared to the previous year.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Free cash flow reflects real financial strength. Growing FCF indicates more flexibility for dividends, share buybacks, and reinvestment.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Declining FCF may point to rising investments, increasing costs, or weaker operating performance.
- Especially for dividend investors, FCF growth is critical – since dividends are paid from actual available cash.
- A negative trend isn't always bad, but it deserves closer attention.
📘 Gross Margin
📈 What is it?
Gross margin shows how much of a company’s revenue remains after deducting the direct costs of goods sold (like materials and production). It represents the company’s “raw profit” before fixed costs, taxes, and interest.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Or simply: Gross Margin = Gross Profit ÷ Revenue × 100
🏛️ Why is it important?
Gross margin indicates how efficiently a company can produce or procure what it sells. It is a key measure of product-level profitability and pricing power.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high gross margin suggests strong pricing power and efficient production.
- Falling margins may signal rising input costs or competitive pressure.
- Compared to peers, gross margin offers insights into the quality of a business model.
📘 EBITDA Margin
📈 What is it?
The EBITDA margin shows how much of a company’s revenue remains as operating profit before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization.It reflects operating efficiency without being distorted by financing or accounting factors.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
The EBITDA margin reveals how much operating income a company generates per dollar of revenue – independent of capital structure and tax effects.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high EBITDA margin reflects strong core profitability – before accounting distortions.
- It allows for effective comparisons across companies and sectors.
- A stable or growing margin signals efficient cost control and business scalability.
📘 EBIT Margin
📈 What is it?
The EBIT margin shows what percentage of revenue remains as operating profit after depreciation but before interest and taxes.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
The EBIT margin reflects a company’s core profitability while accounting for capital intensity (e.g. machinery, infrastructure). It’s especially useful for comparing businesses with different levels of depreciation.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high EBIT margin shows that the company remains efficient even after factoring in depreciation.
- It’s especially relevant for capital-intensive industries.
- Stable or rising EBIT margins over time are a strong indicator of pricing power and business quality.
📘 Net margin
📈 What is it?
Net margin shows how much of a company’s revenue remains as bottom-line profit after deducting all costs, interest, taxes, and depreciation.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Net margin reflects a company’s overall efficiency – across operations, financing, and taxation. It shows how much actual profit is generated from each dollar of revenue.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high net margin means the company is not only strong operationally but also manages financing and taxes efficiently.
- Peer comparisons reveal business quality and competitiveness.
- Declining margins despite revenue growth can be a red flag for rising costs or inefficiencies.
📘 Free cash flow margin
📈 What is it?
The free cash flow (FCF) margin shows how much of a company’s revenue remains as actual free cash after covering all operating expenses and capital expenditures.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
This margin reflects the true liquidity generated by the business – independent of accounting rules or depreciation. It’s especially relevant for dividends, buybacks, and reinvestment decisions.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high FCF margin means a company consistently generates strong cash flow.
- It’s a positive signal for financial stability and shareholder returns.
- The long-term trend is key – a declining margin may indicate rising investments or weakening operating efficiency.
📘 Equity Ratio
📈 What is it?
The equity ratio indicates what portion of a company’s total assets is financed by shareholders’ equity – in other words, how much it relies on its own capital.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
A high equity ratio reflects financial strength and stability, especially during downturns. It’s a key indicator of a company’s solvency and long-term risk profile.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Companies with high equity ratios are generally more resilient and less dependent on external debt.
- Low equity ratios can signal higher risk or aggressive financial strategies.
- Important: Always assess the equity ratio in combination with the return on equity (ROE). This shows not just how stable the company is – but also how efficiently it uses shareholder capital.
📘 Return on Equity (ROE)
📈 What is it?
Return on equity (ROE) shows how efficiently a company uses its shareholders’ equity to generate profit. In other words: how much net income is earned per dollar of equity.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
ROE is a core profitability metric. It helps investors understand whether a company delivers attractive returns on the capital provided by its shareholders.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high ROE indicates that the company is using its capital efficiently and profitably.
- It’s especially meaningful for capital-intensive businesses or firms with high equity bases.
- Important: A very high ROE can also result from high debt levels – always interpret it alongside the equity ratio to assess financial health.
📘 Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
📈 What is it?
ROCE measures how efficiently a company generates profits from its total capital – including both equity and interest-bearing debt.
🧮 How is it calculated?
It evaluates the return on all capital employed, regardless of how it’s financed.
🏛️ Why is it important?
ROCE is ideal for comparing companies with different financing structures. It shows how well management uses capital to create value for both shareholders and creditors.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high ROCE means the company uses its capital efficiently – regardless of whether it's funded by debt or equity.
- The higher the ROCE compared to peers, the more value the company creates with its invested capital.
- Especially relevant for capital-intensive sectors like industrials, energy, or infrastructure.
📘 Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
📈 What is it?
ROIC measures how efficiently a company generates returns from the capital invested in its core operations – regardless of whether the capital comes from equity or debt.
🧮 How is it calculated?
- NOPAT = Net Operating Profit After Taxes
- Invested Capital = Operating assets minus non-interest-bearing liabilities
🏛️ Why is it important?
ROIC is one of the most accurate indicators of capital efficiency. Unlike return on equity, it is not distorted by leverage and shows how much value is created for all capital providers.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high ROIC shows how effectively a company uses the capital that is truly invested in its core operations.
- Unlike ROCE, ROIC focuses only on the capital that is actively used to run the business – and that requires a return (i.e. interest-bearing).
- Especially useful when comparing companies with large amounts of excess cash or non-interest-bearing liabilities – giving a more realistic picture of capital efficiency.
📘 Leverage Ratio (Debt-to-Equity)
📈 What is it?
The leverage ratio indicates how much a company relies on interest-bearing debt (such as loans and bonds) relative to its shareholders’ equity.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
This ratio helps assess a company’s financial structure and risk profile. High leverage can enhance returns – but also increases exposure to interest rate changes and financial stress.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low leverage ratio signals financial strength and independence.
- A higher ratio can improve returns in good times but increases risk during downturns or rising interest rate periods.
- 👉 Always interpret in the context of industry, capital intensity, and interest rate environment.
📘 Earnings per share (EPS)
📈 What is it?
Earnings per Share (EPS) shows how much profit is attributable to a single share – and is one of the most important metrics for evaluating a company's performance.
🧮 How is it calculated?
The diluted share count reflects potential new shares that could be issued through options, convertible bonds, or other rights.
🏛️ Why is it important?
EPS is the basis for many key valuation metrics like P/E ratio, PEG ratio, or payout ratio. It enables comparisons of profitability across companies, regardless of their size.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- EPS captures per-share profitability and is especially useful for comparisons over time or with analyst estimates.
- Rising EPS may signal consistent growth or share buybacks.
- Important: Always use diluted EPS for more realistic valuations – especially in companies with stock-based compensation.
📘 Free cash flow per share (FCF per share)
📈 What is it?
Free Cash Flow per Share shows how much free cash flow a company generates per outstanding share – after investments, but before dividends or debt repayments.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Free cash flow is calculated as operating cash flow minus capital expenditures (CapEx).
🏛️ Why is it important?
FCF per Share reveals how much real cash is available per share – useful for dividends, buybacks, or reducing debt. Unlike net income, free cash flow is harder to manipulate and often seen as a more reliable metric.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- High FCF per share signals strong financial flexibility.
- It shows how much capital the company can effectively reinvest or return to shareholders.
- Particularly relevant for dividend payers and capital-efficient businesses.
📘 Short interest
📈 What is it?
Short interest indicates how many shares of a company are currently sold short – that is, borrowed and sold by investors who expect the price to decline.
🧮 How is it calculated?
It reflects the percentage of a company’s shares that are being shorted relative to the total shares available.
🏛️ Why is it important?
Short interest serves as a sentiment indicator: A high value may signal skepticism or bearish expectations – but also increases the potential for a short squeeze if prices rise unexpectedly.
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Low short interest usually indicates market confidence in the company.
- High short interest can be a warning sign – or an opportunity if sentiment shifts.
- Especially relevant in volatile markets or ahead of key earnings releases.
📘 Employees
📈 What is it?
The employee count shows how many people a company employs worldwide – offering insights into its size, structure, and business model.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It helps assess operational scale, labor intensity, and cost structure. Combined with revenue and profit, it enables key metrics like revenue per employee or productivity.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high headcount can signal operational complexity – but also significant growth capacity.
- Revenue per employee is a key indicator of efficiency.
- Especially useful for comparing tech, industrial, or service-heavy companies.
📘 Turnover per employee
📈 What is it?
Revenue per employee indicates how much revenue a company generates on average per employee – a key measure of efficiency and productivity.
🧮 How is it calculated?
The employee count is typically taken from the most recent annual report.
🏛️ Why is it important?
This metric helps compare business models – especially between labor-intensive and technology-driven companies. A high value suggests automation, operational efficiency, or strong value creation per head.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high revenue per employee indicates a scalable and margin-strong business model.
- A low figure may reflect labor-intensive operations or lower value-add.
- Especially helpful when comparing tech companies to industrial or service sectors.
Instalco Stock Analysis
Analyst Opinions
9 Analysts have issued a Instalco forecast:
Analyst Opinions
9 Analysts have issued a Instalco forecast:
Instalco Events
Past Events
|
JUL
17
Q2 2026 Earnings Call
2 months ago
|
|
APR
29
Q1 2026 Earnings Call
5 months ago
|
|
FEB
12
Q4 2025 Earnings Call
8 months ago
|
|
OCT
24
Q3 2025 Earnings Call
11 months ago
|
StocksGuide Free
Instalco — Q2 2026 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Okay. Welcome to this presentation of Instalco's report for the second quarter of 2026, and my name is Per Sjostrand. I'm CEO of Instalco. And with me today is our CFO, Christina Kassberg. And for the Q&A part, our Head of IR, Mathilda Eriksson. In short, I will say that we see the effect from the changes we have implemented and that Q2 is an important step for Instalco in the right direction.
So as always, I will start with a short snapshot of Instalco today. We are the leading installation group across the Nordics with an established platform also in Germany which I will get back to in this presentation. Our strength is our decentralized, decentralization local companies close to customers, combined with common standards, tools and governance. And with over 6,000 employees, we are exposed to market segments driven by long-term needs such as energy efficiency and electrification.
Slide 3. First, for a quick glance at our LTM numbers, where the majority are taking important steps in the right direction. Net sales amount to SEK 14 billion, as you can see, and we ended the quarter with a backlog of almost SEK 11 billion. This represents a steady book-to-bill of around [ 77% ]. And on top of that, we have our service businesses, which made up 35% of sales in the quarter. Our EBITDA for rolling 12 months amounted to SEK 927 million, corresponding to a margin of 6.6%, a continued step up compared to Q1. And despite the somewhat weaker cash flow from operations in Q2 we maintain a high cash conversion at 90%.
So let me start with a brief summary of the quarter. First, we delivered strong organic growth across all the segments. That reflects a market that is gradually improving, but also that we are executing better across the group. Profitability also improved compared with last year. We are seeing the benefits of better project selection, stronger execution and increased operational discipline. Our order backlog strengthened further during the quarter, giving us a solid foundation for the coming quarters. The market picture is still mixed, but activity continues to develop in the right direction.
And finally, in Instalco 2.0 continues to gain traction. The work we started last year is becoming part of where we operate every day, and we are seeing the effects in more parts of the business. I think that was the big picture, Christina. Let's dive into the numbers.
Thank you, Per. I will start with looking at net sales and order backlog development during Q2 Net sales grew by 10.3% to almost SEK 3.9 billion. Currency had a slight positive impact on the outcome. Organic growth, on the other hand, remained positive and strong at 8.4%, and we saw growth in all 3 countries. When looking at where the most growth came from, we can see a strong increase from companies working with industrial clients. Geographically, the biggest sales growth came from West and South of Sweden as well as Norway. Our order backlog also reported even more growth of 17% or 14.8% organically. The backlog increase was primarily driven by Norway but also came from Sweden. In addition to the backlog service continues to provide a solid foundation for the business.
In the quarter, it amounted to 35% of sales, and we delivered growth in absolute numbers of 9% in our service business, driven by Sweden and Norway. Then moving on to earnings, EBITDA grew by 22% to SEK 274 million, corresponding to a margin of 7.1% compared to 6.4% a year ago. Last year, Q2 had a one-off costs of SEK 11 million. Adjusting for this, the comparison margin amounted to 6.7% and still this year is still better. The year-on-year development reflects both improved operational performance and the higher volumes in the quarter.
Margins improved in most of our business areas. The biggest improvement year-on-year came from industrial-facing companies as well as the North of Sweden and our technical consultants at Intec. We are not yet where we want to be, but the quarter marked an important step in the right direction.
Next, I will look into each country in more detail. First up, we have a look at Sweden in Q2. Overall, net sales grew by 10% to SEK 2.8 billion with an accelerated organic growth of 9%. The order backlog increased even more by 13.1% compared to a year ago to SEK 7.5 billion. The EBITDA increased to SEK 197 million, corresponding to a margin of 7% compared to 6.6% last year. The stronger margin and improved earnings reflects higher volumes and operational improvements supported by a gradually improving market. The Swedish market continued to improve during the quarter, and the signs of recovery are becoming clearer.
Activity is increasing, especially in the larger cities where more projects are now moving into the execution phase. In Stockholm, this is especially true for somewhat larger projects. We are also seeing early signs of a recovery in the residential market, although from low levels. At the same time, development remains uneven across regions and customer groups.
And now for a summary of Norway. Overall, net sales were up to SEK 625 million and organic growth amounted to 4.9% FX effects impacted positively. EBITDA amounted to SEK 42 million compared to SEK 36 million last year. This corresponds to a margin improvement from 6.5% to 6.8%. We are proud that Norway managed to showcase both growth and improved earnings despite experiencing delayed start dates in several projects. This due to permitting and decision processes. This is a timing issue rather than lost demand.
And our subsidiaries have managed to navigate these new projects to cover the other wise lower utilization. Norway showed the continued very strong development of the order backlog, which increased by over 40% compared to a year ago or 35% organically. The Norwegian market remains challenging, but we continue to see signs of a gradual recovery. Activity is strongest in Oslo and the southern part of the country. supported by public investments in hospitals, defense, infrastructure and data centers. The residential market remains weak, while commercial projects are developing more steadily. Competition is still high, but pricing has become more rational than before.
And last but not least, a summary of Finland. Net sales grew by 8.6% to SEK 432 million, organically by 9.3% with a negative impact from FX. The order backlog decreased slightly by 3.8% compared to a year ago or minus 3.3% organically. EBITA amounted to SEK 35 million compared to SEK 30 million last year. This corresponds to a margin improvement from 7.3% to 8.1%. The improvement was primarily driven by a continued fairly strong contribution from companies delivering projects for the industrial customers, while performance in the Finnish installation operations was more subdued. The Finnish market remains weak, but we believe it has reached the bottom.
Residential construction and larger private investments are still at low levels, while industrial projects and renovation continue to drive activity. We do not expect a broader market recovery in the near term, although market sentiment has improved somewhat. At the same time, investments in the energy transition, defense and digital infrastructure continue to support the [ mat ]. Data centers are also becoming an increasingly important growth area in the Finnish market.
Before I hand over to you, Per, let me briefly touch on our cash flow. In Q2, cash flow from operations amounted to SEK 104 million, which was weaker than the same period last year. The main reason is that more capital was tied up in accounts receivable, following the strong growth and high level of invoicing towards the end of the quarter.
Importantly, we have not seen a corresponding increase in overdue receivables which gives us confidence in the underlying quality of the receivables book. Strong cash flow and healthy balance sheet remain key priorities for Instalco, and we continue to maintain a disciplined approach to working capital allocation and selective investments.
Yes, that concludes the financial review from my side. So Per over to you.
Thank you, Christina. And let me put the rolling 12-month performance into the context of our long-term targets. Our financial targets are measured over a business cycle, and we continue to make steady progress. The combination of stronger organic growth and improved profitability is encouraging and reflects that both the market and our own execution are moving in the right direction.
As you saw, our EBITDA margin improved further to 6.6%. While we are not where we ultimately want to be, the direction is clear. And we continue to see benefits from our better project selection, stronger execution and the work under Instalco 2.0. We know that we can do better, of course. Cash flow was weaker during the quarter, mainly because more capital was tied up in receivables following our strong growth towards the end of the period. We remain focused on working capital discipline and continue to target 100% cash conversion over time.
Our leverage remains somewhat over our own long-term target of 2.5x net debt to EBITDA. At the end of the Q2, it sits at 2.6x. The same as in Q1 despite us paying the dividend in May and the acquisition of TSM in April. And finally, our climate ambitions remain unchanged. Sustainability continues to be integrated into -- in how we develop the business over the long term. Before we moved to this quarter theme. I would like to spend a few minutes on the transaction we announced after the end of the quarter. As you might have seen, Instalco has increased its ownership in the German installation group Fabri from 24% to 51%. This makes Germany our fourth operating country and giving us a majority control of the business.
This is not a new strategic direction, it is the next planned step in the partnership that we announced in late 2024. Our ambition from the beginning has been to build a long-term platform in Germany together with Fabri founders and management team. And this transaction is an important milestone in that journey. So with that, to give you a bit of flavor. Here, we have 2 screenshots of Fabri's website, one from 2024 and one from yesterday indeed. Since we first invested, Fabri has doubled its size the development has been driven by continued acquisitions and strong entrepreneurship within the group. More importantly, it reinforced our conviction that the decentralized model works well beyond the Nordic countries.
And you know, Germany is Europe's largest installation market. Fabri has established a strong regional platform with attractive local companies and an experienced management team. The transaction itself is straightforward. We have acquired an additional 27% of the shares, increasing our ownership from 24% to 51%. The acquisition has been financed within our existing credit facilities and therefore, fits well within our disciplined capital allocation framework. The ownership structure that has -- that was agreed from the beginning remains unchanged going forward, meaning the founders continue to have a meaningful ownership stake alongside in Instalco, and I think that is very important.
Let's move to the next slide, there. What is perhaps most important is what's changed -- changes and what does not. Fabri will continue to operate with the same local management, the same entrepreneurial culture and the same decentralized way of working that has made the group successful. What changes is that Fabri now becomes part of Instalco's consolidating reporting, and we expect closer collaboration across the organization.
[ Marcus Siebert ], the CEO of Fabri, will also join -- CEO, of course, of Fabri, will also join Instalco's Group management team. We already see a strong exchange of experience between our Nordic companies and Fabri and becoming a majority owner gives us an even better platform for sharing best practice, developing capabilities and supporting continued profitable growth. So Germany represents a significant long-term opportunity for Instalco, and together with the Fabri team, we look forward to continue in that journey.
So with that, I will say also let's move into the CEO theme for the quarter. And before we move into Q&A, I'd like to spend a few minutes on the topic -- on a topic that we believe will become increasingly important for Instalco over coming years. And one we -- and [ when ] we have received a lot of questions on over the past few months, I promise you. AI is changing many industries. Most discussions focus on software or semiconductors, but much less attention is paid to what has happened in the physical world to make AI possible.
For us, AI is not just a technology -- technological trend. It affects both the demand for technical installation and how we run our own business. And let me explain directly what I mean. The first perspective is the market. AI requires physical infrastructure. Data centers need electricity, cooling, ventilation and advanced control systems. Higher electricity demand also drives investment in grids and energy infrastructure. Data centers are a growing [ end-market ] for Instalco, we already delivered projects in this area and see good opportunities to grow further. We evaluate every project based on the right balance between risk and return. And I will say there is another important effect. Large AI investments absorb installation capacity across the market, no matter which company is doing the installations. That improves market conditions in many other types of installation projects as well.
So AI creates opportunities in 2 ways through growing demand for data center projects and by strengthening up the broader installation market. The second perspective is our own organization. We believe AI can remove friction from everyday work, allowing our employees to spend more time on activities that create value for customers. It can support the entire project life cycle from analyzing tender documentation and planning projects to administration, documentation and follow-up.
So during June, we launched Instalco AI across the group. It provides a secure common platform together with both general and specialized assistance that are available throughout our decentralized organization. The important point is that this is built to support our people, not replace their professional judgment. Our project managers, engineers and installers remain the ones making the decision. And before we move on, let me make one personal reflection. I have worked in this industry for almost 45 years. I have seen the introduction of computers, CADCAM, Beam, [indiscernible] many other technology shifts. But I can honestly say that I have never seen a development with greater potential than AI. This is exactly why we decided not to wait. We wanted Instalco to move early learn early and build capabilities early. I want us to be among the companies shaping this change, not reacting to it afterwards.
And that brings me to the third point. AI can support our business, but it cannot install a ventilation system, connect an electrical panel or commissioning a building. Installation work remains local, physical and increasingly technically advanced. As buildings becomes more complex, the need for skilled professionals actually increases.
So while AI changes how buildings are designed, operated and used it also increased the importance of technical installation expertise. We see this as an opportunity from 2 directions. It supports demand in our markets, and it helps our people work smarter every day. Together, that strengthens Instalco's long-term position.
So with that, let me finish with a few concluding remarks. In Q2, we delivered strong growth together with improved profitability. It is encouraging to see that all segments contributed with organic growth, while our focus on execution continues to strengthen margins. The market recovery is gaining momentum, although it remains uneven across geographies, segments and customer groups. At the same time, our order backlog has strengthened further giving us a solid foundation for the coming quarters.
Instalco 2.0 continues to gain traction. The work we started last year is becoming increasingly embedded in our daily operations. and we are seeing the benefits in more parts of the business. During the quarter, we also launched Instalco AI across the group. We see AI as an opportunity both to support productivity in our operations and to benefit from the long-term demand it creates for technical escalations. And after the end of the quarter, we took the next strategic step from Germany by becoming the majority owner of Fabri, it's a natural continuation of the strategy we presented in 2024 and strengthens our platform for long-term growth. Overall, we leave the first half of the year with a stronger business than we had a year ago and with confidence that we are moving in the right direction.
And with that, I would like to thank you for listening in and open up for questions. [Operator Instructions]
[Operator Instructions] The next question comes from Oscar Ronnkvist from SEB.
2. Question Answer
Thank you, and good day, everybody. So my first will be for some details just on the Fabri acquisition. So first of all, just on the margin side, the SEK 125 million turnover. Is that sort of coming with a 12.7% margin as in 2025? Should that be a sort of a reasonable assumption? And then just on minority, et cetera. I assume that you will report the 49% as a minority and not any sort of with call options, et cetera.
Mathilda, are you ready for that question?
We haven't published any margins apart from what was press released yesterday and the SEK 125 million is a pro forma from Fabri's website, including an acquisition they made a couple of weeks ago. But I mean has reported impressive margins. They're operating in a slightly different market than we are in Nordics. And of course, we're hoping that they can maintain a level like this, but we're not making any promises.
When it comes to minority interest, I think Christina is the best to answer on that one?
We will consolidate the Fabri now when we have the 51% in the group and the minorities of 49% will be noncontrolling items. So according to IFRS, as nothing else than that [ expected ].
Perfect. Then just regarding the data center comments, you say that, obviously, it has an impact on market pricing as capacity is tied up in data centers from either you or your competitors, so if we look at the order backlog, which was developing quite nicely in the quarter. So have you seen this shift in pricing already? Or is it more that you expect to see that going forward?
I think we have seen it -- maybe we have seen it already. As you said, it ties up a lot of resources. And I think also when we talk about data centers to participate, we have scaffolding, we have ventilation, we have heating and plumbing, maybe there is some huge demand for electricians, of course, in a data center to install all the equipment and you have to allocate a lot of resources, maybe it should be -- we are a little bit more cautious around that. But on the other side, we are willing to participate in those projects, and we have a discussion around that, of course.
So the answer is yes, we can see changes already in the market due to data centers.
Got it. And just regarding your capacity on delivering on large data center orders. Is that -- are you in those procurements? Just thinking of the larger ones that maybe have been announced from a competitor? Or are they a little bit out of your scope, would you say?
No, it's not other scope. I mean we are partners. If we [ shoot ] us, we are definitely a partner in those discussions. So we have, I mean, a dialogue around data centers and with the colleagues in the construction market.
I think I can add on just reiterating Per's comments from before, but we're as always, evaluating every project on a risk-reward basis. So we will only go for projects that suit us and our capabilities.
Perfect. Yes. I had one question on the Finnish margin. Obviously, you've been very, very strong over the last 3 quarters, took a little bit of a dip in this quarter, albeit obviously stronger year-over-year from the 7% last year. So could you just add some color? Do you think that you saw some sort of dip was the sort of [ 11%, 12% ] elevated? Or is there any sort of comments on the sort of run rate we have?
I mean Finland still come in above 8%, and I'm satisfied with that. I think that's a rate, and what Finland is also our smallest segment, SEK 1 billion a year. And I can't -- of course, it can go a little bit ups and downs there. They are very focused on industrial, the more heavy industrial part in Finland. So I think I'm satisfied with 8% or above. So I'm not worried, but it can fluctuate a little. That's for sure. from quarter-to-quarter.
Yes. Got it. And then sorry, just a last question, if I may.
The cash flow, you talked about stronger and, I suppose, with the receivable tie-up in June, if I interpreted correctly. So is it fair to assume that you had sort of strong acceleration towards the latter part of the quarter? I think you made some comments about that.
Yes, you are totally sure about that. We tied up more capital with -- around accounts receivables in the end of the quarter. And it's no problem to sort of say, overdue accounts receivable. So we are confident.
Okay. It looks like we currently have no more people in the queue for the telephone conference. Or no, we just got one.
The next question comes from Karl Bokvist from ABG Sundal Collier.
So I'm just curious on the Swedish development here. When we have had these comments for a couple of quarters now, we have improved market activity, more projects becoming available, you're a lot of things internally as well. And we've been talking about how we need to get a few things in place, so to say, before margins really start ticking upwards because of contracts taken earlier in time and so on and so forth.
So when we now look into the next perhaps 6- to 12-month period, can you now say that the orders that are to be executed upon are on a better level.
I think overall, we can say that. But of course, we -- it's I mean we have several cases here. The risk assessment that we have done, I think it's better today. That means that we have taken in more stable orders or less risk in the orders. I think that is one thing. We see an improved market activity, as we mentioned, and I will also say that execution, what we have worked with so much in Instalco 2.0 is also gaining us. So I think it's a combination, but I'm rather comfortable around the Swedish market as well as what we can achieve in the Swedish market. So it's a combination, as you can hear, but I think we are where we want to be right now.
And also if I can add one thing. I think we can now see in the larger cities like Stockholm and increasing -- is increasing activities. And that is very important. I mentioned it before because that is the engine of the construction market in Sweden. So that's also something to add to this discussion.
All right. And then in Norway, when you say that some progress starts were postponed due to external permitting, et cetera, and that represents a delay. Of course, maybe there are several projects and they are kind of stacked time-wise a bit differently. But when you have these comments in the report, are we like talking about a 6-month delay or 2 months delay just thinking about growth opportunities here?
It's very much project by project basis, some have been moved into 2027, and others have been moved for 2 to 3 months. So it's very hard to give an average.
Okay. All right. That's -- yes, just this might be difficult, of course. But when Fabri now enters the business, and you say that it's similar in a couple of ways and of course, much better profitability. But is the German business in any way different in how they work with working capital and the net contract assets and so on?
I will say no, but looking at Christina, I mean they are very strong local companies. I think they have a very close relationship with the customers I mean, they get paid in time. I don't know if there is any...
In general, the CFO answer would be on that question. We will consolidate Fabri according to IFRS like the other Nordic business. So in that sense it's installation, but in another country. But of course, let's see how everything develops in the coming quarter when we consolidate and take the questions. Very well there.
Thank you. We do have a couple of written in questions from the webcast as well.
I think if we start with the first one is how has the market developed during the quarter?
Yes, I think we have mentioned it several times now. But overall, I mean, we are positive. That's for sure. but still large differences between regions and end markets, as we have also mentioned several times. So I think -- I mean, looking into Sweden, clear improvements Norway, selling, but stable. Finland, weaker market maybe, but I think they will recover in short. And that in -- so improved market conditions, absolutely. That is -- but it's slowly development, I think. And what we mean with improvements is that there are more and more projects to calculate or even [ offer ] on. So I think, yes, we are rather optimistic.
Another. Quite a nice one for you, Per. Mr. Sjostrand, how are you able to motivate and do such an impressive turnaround since August '25 and so quickly? Would love to implement saying into my own workdays in management.
Once again...
Essentially, I think he's asking, how did you manage to complete this turnaround in such a short time?
It's my job. It's my job. So yes, that's -- I think it's just but of course, I will underline this. This is a team effort. It's not just one person. Maybe I can introduce a lot of things, and I can come up with ideas, but it's a teamwork. And everyone has been so enthusiastic around what we have now launched. So I think it's like a piano plays itself. So yes, that's my simple answer.
Thank you. Next question is around Fabri. Can you afford more M&A after Fabri [ step 2 ]? And what is the pro forma leverage after this transaction is completed? And I can just add that up, of course, in Q3.
I think, Christina or one there...
I would say we are comfortable. Even accounting for a cash outflow now in the next quarter, Q3 for Fabri, consolidating in step, step 2, as we call it, we maintain good headroom on the stated bank accounts. And remember, in our external reporting, we don't need to -- we don't include Fabri's EBITDA for the last months. But in bank covenants, you do that. So we get their pro forma numbers in due in [ Q2 ] also. So continue M&A. We maintain a selective approach to capital allocation just like before.
Okay. I currently have now more people in the queue, and we have one final written question as of the moment.
Intec has had margins above the group for several quarters? How does it look in Q2?
I mean Intec still continues the trend to deliver above group margin, as you said. And I think the trend in the I think it's also that we are as always, I will say that we are taking on a lot of new startups all the time. So of course, it affects us, but starting up a company or a group, of course, is costly. But with that said, also, our estimation is that they will still have double-digit numbers.
And I think that also the consulting industry should exceed what we talk about when we talk about installation margins, so I think there's no reason to believe that they will not still an ongoing exceed our margins from the installation part.
All right. We have no further questions at this moment.
Okay. Thank you very much for joining in, and have a great summer. Thank you very much, everyone.
Instalco — Q1 2026 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Welcome to this presentation of Instalco's report for the first quarter 2026. My name is Per Sjostrand. I'm CEO of Instalco. And with me today is our CFO, Christina Kassberg; and for the Q&A part, our Head of IR, Mathilda Eriksson.
The start of 2026 is further proof that we are moving in the right direction. And as always, I will start with a short snapshot of Instalco today. We are a leading installation group across the Nordics with an established platform also in Germany.
Our strength is our decentralization, I would say, local companies close to customers, combined with common standards, tools, and governance. With over 6,000 employees, we are exposed to market segments driven by long-term needs such as energy efficiency and electrification.
First, for a quick glance at our LTM numbers. Net sales amounted to SEK 13.7 billion, and we ended the quarter with a backlog of almost SEK 10.4 billion, which represents a steady book-to-bill of around 75%. This is a sign of more activity in the market as well as proactive selling from our companies. At the same time, we will still have the available capacity to take on more projects when the market improves further.
Our EBITA for rolling 12 months amounts to SEK 877 million, corresponding to a margin of 6.4%, a significant step-up compared to Q4. The strong cash flow in Q1 as well as throughout the last year kept our LTM cash flow from operations above SEK 1 billion, showcasing our strong focus on improving working capital. And this means that we report a cash conversion of 100%, and that is exactly on target, in fact.
Then let me briefly summarize the quarter. We are starting to see clear signs that the market is improving. Activity is picking up, although it's still uneven. And we see that in our order backlog, which is growing in all 3 countries.
At the same time, this is not just about the market. The work we are doing is making a difference and Instalco 2.0 is gaining traction. There is, of course, still a lot of work to be done, but we are confident that we are doing the right things. And that -- and this means that we are seeing improvements in both organic growth and in EBITA -- on EBITA level.
We also continue to strengthen cash flow. And importantly, we have fewer major negative project deviation. That's very important. That gives us a more stable business and a better foundation going forward.
And for now, I will hand over to Christina, who will take you through our financial development in more detail.
Thank you, Per. I'll start with net sales and order backlog and how they developed during the quarter. Net sales grew by 4.4% to slightly above SEK 3.4 billion. Currency had a negative impact on the outcome with minus 1%. Organic growth, on the other hand, remained positive at 4.9%, and we saw growth in all 3 countries.
Our order backlog also reported even more growth of 15% or 14.2% organically. On order backlog, we saw good growth in all 3 countries and the most in Norway.
What I said in Q4 also holds true for Q1. Especially for the Norwegian order growth, it is important to keep in mind that many of the projects taken have long durations. I would therefore caution against expecting it to quickly go to execution.
In addition to the backlog, we have our service business, which remains an important stabilizing factor. For the first quarter, service amounted to 33% of sales.
Then moving on to the earnings. As expected, the quarter was impacted by normal seasonal patterns with lower activity during the first 2 months of the year, followed by a strong finish in March. EBITA amounted to SEK 201 million, corresponding to a margin of 5.8%.
The year-on-year development reflects both improved operational performance and to some extent items affecting comparability in the prior year. Overall, we are seeing gradual improvements in underlying profitability, although the development remains somewhat uneven. Improved margins continues to be a key priority across the group.
And before we move on to the next slide, from this quarter, we have moved to country-based segment reporting, Sweden, Norway, and Finland, to better reflect how the business is managed. I will now walk you through each country.
First up, over to a slide that summarizes Sweden in Q1. Overall, net sales grew to SEK 2.45 billion with an organic growth of 1.5%. The order backlog increased by 7.6% compared to a year ago, to SEK 7.1 billion. The EBITA amounted to SEK 124 million, corresponding to a margin of 5% compared to 4.1% last year.
The stronger margin is the result of the segment no longer being burdened by last year's one-off costs combined with operational improvements. Improved margins and earnings are evident across the majority of geographical areas. At the same time, performance continues to be weighed down by a persistently challenging market and some delayed industrial projects.
Sweden experienced even clearer seasonality effects than the other countries and is still working through projects taken in a tougher market environment. The market is showing clear signs of recovery with higher activity and more projects moving forward. At the same time, the development remains uneven. Decision-making is still relatively slow, but we are seeing more inquiries and better opportunities to be selective.
Demand in technical consulting, automation, and digitalization continues to strengthen, indicating a gradual improvement. The industrial market remains mixed with stable development in areas such as electrification, defense, and parts of the green transition. But as always, it is important to keep in mind that installations is late cyclical.
And now for a summary of Finland. Net sales grew organically by 30% to SEK 431 million. FX impacted negatively by minus 6.2%. The order backlog increased by 9.9% compared to a year ago or 8.9% organically. EBITA amounted to SEK 52 million compared to SEK 7 million last year. This corresponds to a margin improvement from 2% to 12%.
The improvement is explained by higher utilization and better project execution in several companies as well as a very strong performance in companies with projects towards industrial clients. These companies are based and reported in Finland, but the largest share of their customers and projects are located in Sweden. And internally, these companies belong to our business area industry.
As for the Finnish market, activity remains low with residential construction and larger private investments still largely on hold. A broader market recovery is not expected in the near term and overall sentiment remains cautious. At the same time, investments linked to the energy transition, defense, and digital infrastructure continues to support underlying demand over time.
And finally, a summary of Norway. Overall, net sales were up slightly to SEK 552 million and organic growth amounted to 3.6%. FX effects impacted negatively by minus 2.6%. EBITA amounted to SEK 26 million compared to SEK 18 million last year. This corresponds to a margin improvement from 3.3% to 4.6%.
The improved margin is mainly explained by better utilization and a more favorable project mix compared to last year. Several companies have achieved good profitability in ongoing projects. More proactive sales efforts and somewhat less aggressive pricing pressure have also contributed positively.
Norway showed very strong development of the order backlog, which increased by over 40% compared to a year ago. Norway was showing good order intake over the past few quarters, which drives this number up, but it also represents a sequential uptick of 18% compared to Q4.
It is, however, important to remember that some of these are, for us, larger orders with longer durations. I would, therefore, caution against expecting it to quickly go to execution, especially since the macro environment continues to create some uncertainty around investment decisions and project timing in Norway with several projects in Phase 1 showing delays regarding to the start of Phase 2.
In Norway, the market continues to stabilize with clearer signs of recovery, although at a gradual pace. Activity remains strongest in Oslo and the Southern regions, supported by public investments, while we also see some improvements in commercial segments such as logistics and technology. Competition remains high, although pricing discipline has improved somewhat.
Then on to the cash generation in the quarter. In Q1, cash flow from operations amounted to SEK 234 million compared to SEK 223 million a year ago. The increase is mostly related to the stronger earnings and somewhat higher adjustments for noncash items related to unrealized FX losses.
We still managed to showcase a working capital release of SEK 75 million, although this is slightly lower than last year's, mainly due to tougher comparables with a larger reduction in accounts receivables and contract assets in the prior year period. Taken together with a strong development throughout this and previous quarters means we ended up with a cash conversion at 100%.
In total, the cash flow performance gives us confidence in the direction and the quality of our execution. This cash flow profile strengthens our financial foundation and increases our flexibility going forward.
So by that, over to you, Per.
Thank you, Christina. And I have to say a fantastic work done with cash flow, you and your team have done. It gives us a lot of opportunities going forward. So I'm very satisfied with that.
So then let's have a look at our performance on a rolling 12-month basis in relation to our financial targets. Our targets are defined over a business cycle. You have to have that in mind. And in the current market, we continue to prioritize profitability and disciplined project selection over pure volume growth.
Despite this, we are happy to have reported 2 quarters now in a row of organic growth. And we have complemented this with a strategic acquisition, TSM Taksakerhetsmontorerna, announced in mid-April.
The EBITA margin came in at 6.4%, a clear improvement from just 1 quarter ago, but we are still far from satisfied. The implementation of Instalco 2.0 is progressing according to plan, and we see room to improve further in our operations.
Over to cash -- operational cash flow. It was again strong with a conversion rate, as Christina mentioned, of 100%, at our target, supported by ongoing improvements in working capital efficiency.
Our leverage remains somewhat over our own long-term target of 2.5x net debt to EBITDA, though it has continued to come down and as of the end of Q1 sits at 2.6x.
The Board proposes a dividend of SEK 0.5 per share for approval at the AGM next week. And of course, we remain firmly focused on delivering on our climate commitments as part of our long-term targets.
Let's go to the CEO theme for this quarter. And let me take a few minutes to explain how our business is composed and what actually drives our performance.
Instalco is built as a group of specialized companies. And over time, that has resulted in a well-balanced portfolio across projects, disciplines, customers, and end markets. And this is because -- I mean, it means our performance is not dependent. It's important to say also that our performance is not dependent on any single segment or type of project, and I think that's very important to mention.
If we start with the type of work we do, these charts show our net sales for 2025, broken down in different ways. I think you can find them in our annual report. Around 70% of our business comes from service and renovation. And these are typical smaller ongoing or repeat assignments offered closer to the customer and somewhat less correlated to the business cycle.
In addition, the majority of our projects are not fixed price. This gives us more flexibility in execution and reduce the risk in more complex projects. And taken together, this means that a significant part of our business is either recurring or has a low risk profile.
Looking in or at how the business is distributed, we have a broad mix across disciplines. No single discipline dominates and we combine several technical areas within the group. And the same applies to our customer base. We work with a wide range of customer groups from construction and industrial companies to public sector and property owners. This variety reduce our dependency on individual segments and gives us a more stable foundation over time.
At the same time, this is not static. As part of Instalco 2.0, we are working more actively with our customer mix, including more proactive sales, it's very important, and clearer prioritization built, for example, [ ABC ] categories. So this allows us to gradually shift towards the right type of customers and projects over time.
Finally, if we look at our exposure across end markets, we see a similar pattern. This chart also show net sales for 2025. And compared to previous years, we have now broken the end market down into more categories, including logistics, warehousing, energy production, and data centers.
So despite shifts in the market over time, our overall exposure remains well balanced. And going forward, we will continue to actively shape this mix as part of Instalco 2.0.
No single end market dominates, and we maintain a presence across several segments with different underlying drivers. This reduces cyclicality and makes the group less sensitive to changes in any one part of the market. And overall, this composition also -- of the group gives us multiple drivers of performance and supports a more stable and resilient business over time. I will underline that.
So before wrapping up, I want to briefly return to Instalco 2.0. As you understand, this is my favorite topic.
While the previous section focused on our business mix and multiple drivers of performance, this is the framework that underpins how we execute across all of that. And this is a slide we showed last quarter, but it's worth repeating.
Instalco 2.0 is not a one-off initiative. It's a long-term shift in how we run the business. In Q3, we defined -- 2025, we defined the framework and aligned the operational model. In Q4 2025, we moved into execution, embedding it into daily operations.
Now during Q1, that work has continued according to plan. The rollout is progressing. The structure is being applied more consistently across the group, and it remains our top priority. We are still early, but this is about building a more disciplined and consistent way of working over time with continuous improvement at the core.
So let us return to the quarter and summarize the key takeaways. We continue to improve EBITA. And this quarter, the progress is broader with more parts of the business contributing. It's a step in the right direction even if there is still more to do. I will also underline that.
At the same time, we are seeing clearly -- clearer signs of recovery in the market. Activity is picking up, but it remains uneven. And given the continued uncertainty in the global market environment, we maintain a disciplined and selective approach.
Operationally, we delivered strong cash flow, as I have said earlier, and an even stronger financial position, which gives us increased flexibility going forward.
Instalco 2.0 is continuing to gain traction. The changes we are implementing are becoming more visible in daily operations, and we are seeing the benefits of a more structured way of working. This is very much thanks to the engagement across the organization and the work being done at all levels to continuously improve.
And importantly, we are operating with greater discipline in execution with fewer major negative project deviations, contributing to a more stable and predictable performance. All in all, we are moving in the right direction step-by-step from a stronger position.
So -- and with that, I would like to thank you for listening, and open up for questions. First, the telephone conference --from the telephone conference, but those of you following via webcast can submit written questions as well. Thank you very much.
[Operator Instructions] The next question comes from Oscar Ronnkvist from SEB.
2. Question Answer
So my first question would be on the margin. So in Finland, obviously it looks very strong as it has done over the last few quarters. So I just wanted to hear your thoughts about the sustainability of that level. And also I wanted to sort of hear on the opposite side in Sweden, if we adjust for the one-offs last year, I think the margin is down around 170 basis points. I think you talked about project margins being quite soft in the delivery that you have in Q4. So just wanted to hear if you have any comments on when the lower project margins are sort of out of the delivery.
Shall we start maybe with the question around Sweden? I mean, in Sweden, we have improved margins. We have a more stable underlying activity. And also, I also want to say that our project portfolio and our back -- order backlogs, they are more stable. The projects are more stable. We are not writing ups and downs all the time. We have more -- the foundation is very, very solid, I would say. You don't see that so much in the margins, but I have -- I think I'm rather satisfied with that as well. We have worked in another way with order backlogs and order intake. So I think that will improve. So that's Sweden. We don't see it yet, but I think that will come.
Finland -- I mean, you were talking about Finland, Christina, as well. I mean, we -- of course, we had a low margin last year. So the uplift is very encouraging, and it's driven by higher utilization, improved project execution, and strong performance in companies.
I also want to add that while these industrial companies in Finland are reported in Finland, much of the business is in Sweden. So it's integrated with our industrial operations there. Maybe you should look -- put that together. And also given the small size of the Finland segment, we can, of course, expect quarterly volatility since individual projects have a larger effect on the whole. So we, therefore, recommend analyzing performance over rolling 12 months rather than individual quarters.
I don't -- do you have something to add to that, Christina? No?
No.
Okay.
My next question would just be on the turmoil recently we have seen in geopolitics and specifically on potential cost inflation. And I mean, if you can recall what you did a few years ago when we had high cost inflation, we see fuel prices coming up, et cetera, et cetera. So can you talk a little bit about how you are dealing with the potential cost inflation now in some of the contracts that you have and also higher fuel prices, et cetera?
A very good question, and it's always actual. But I mean, the situation is clearly more uncertain. That's for sure. This is not a new territory for us as an installation group. And we have a lot of lesson learned from 2021, 2022.
So from an operational perspective, this is something we try to actively manage. And we have closer supply -- lesson learned, we have closer supplier relationships, and we are used to handling price fluctuations. And we are also working more consistently with contract structures, price clauses, for example, project selection and that reduce risk over time. So we are aware of the -- of course, we are aware about the situation, but we are taking actions to meet that, I would say. And lesson learned from 2021, 2022, definitely.
And just to follow-up, have you seen any significant pressure on any sort of cost inflation near term or?
Not yet, not yet. I mean, for the first quarter, the impact on our businesses has been very limited, if any, I would say. So no, we haven't seen it yet. But of course, we understand that it will come.
I think the final question just on more technical, maybe you can speak now on the CapEx levels. I think they are a little bit higher than usual in the quarter. I just wanted to see if there's anything structural. I think it was CapEx to sales of around 1.3%. Normally, it's around half of that approximately. Anything structural? Or is it temporary in Q1?
I would say, from the start, we are a CapEx-light business, but some investments are necessary, of course, and these can fluctuate a bit from quarter-to-quarter. And significant for Q1, we had some more CapEx investment in our industrial companies in Q1. So that is what you -- can be seen in this quarter.
The next question comes from Karl Bokvist from ABG Sundal Collier.
I had a follow-up there on the Finnish business. I hear what you're saying here, but just to be a bit mindful of the fact that I believe about a year ago or so, you had some very profitable projects in Norway that you actually flagged that you had had good project execution and also said that in the next -- in the upcoming quarters, things would not -- perhaps not be as good. So just to kind of verify or double check here, also given the high organic growth in the quarter. Is there anything similar happening here now where the Finnish companies are approaching the end of a few very profitable completed projects?
Hello, Karl. I think, as for Finland, they have also had good order intake. That's continuing also going forward. But then, of course, 12% is an exceptionally strong margin. And as Per mentioned, it's important to remember that it's quite a small segment. So I think quarterly variations here will not be unexpected.
And I would say, they are doing very well. So I mean, it's not just [indiscernible].
But it's not like we will see a few very abnormal quarters. I understand the variations, but just to get that kind of answered.
So the second question is -- yes, sorry?
I think 12% is a very, very strong performance. We're probably expecting continued good performance, but we're not going to make any promises on margin levels.
Then on -- we can both look regionally, but also just on a group level, it's encouraging to see that the contract sales business is still growing or growing for the second quarter in a row. At the same time, we see services being down a little. I'm just curious here if it has to do with some of the underlying units shifting from service work to contract work, or if there's anything worth flagging here on the service business side of Instalco.
I mean, we are showing growth for the group as more project-related business has picked up. And this grows quicker than service. And it's, therefore, natural that service as a percentage of sales comes down somewhat. And as for individual quarters, services in absolute numbers can, of course, fluctuate somewhat. But it's a balance between projects and service, and so that can fluctuate.
And we are very comfortable with what we now see here and we are comfortable with that level that we have.
The next question comes from Johan Dahl from Danske Bank.
Just trying to drill a little bit deeper on the Swedish performance. I was wondering if you can divide it slightly on -- I'm talking about this margin decline year-on-year in Sweden. Can you divide it in -- slightly in contracting service? Also if -- do I interpret you correctly that you're referring to a more stable order book that will materialize and sort of rectify the situation during '26? So how should we read your comments there on the stable and the quality of the order book?
That's a good question, of course. But I would say that we have a more stable order book. We have -- there have been -- we took on contracts in 2024, 2025 that we see still have sort of dragging us. But I mean that it's a more healthy business today. Seeing result of it will take some time, not years, but still quarters. So my gut feeling is that, as I mentioned, is that we will see improvements in margin here. And I will be very surprised if that's not coming up -- coming in quarters ahead. So I'm rather comfortable even though we have a lower or a flat margin in Sweden. But I think they are doing the right things. We are taking all the actions that we have decided on. So I'm not worried. I'm rather comfortable about the Swedish, how they perform and will perform in the future.
So it's more a pricing issue than utilization issue in Sweden [indiscernible] is that right?
Yes. Exactly. Exactly.
Can you provide some or any update on the German venture such as timing, latest MTM earnings and possibly cash outflow?
I mean, first of all, a long-term agreement underpins the collaboration between Instalco and Fabri. And now we are -- as you might know, we are approaching the next phase of ownership, in line with our multiphase model. But at the same time, execution is dependent on the right timing and preparations. We are -- I think we can talk around about the second half of 2026 now. They perform well. And I'm sitting in the chair there, of course, as a chairman. But also, I think that they perform well, and we have no signs of ups and downs or that the market will go down. So I think so far, so good. And we will follow our ambitions to sign off -- sign here. And...
Yes. And all in all, I can add that, as said in Q4, the timing for step 2 is still expected to become relevant during the second half of 2026.
The next question comes from Johan Lonnqvist Sunden from DNB Carnegie.
First one is also a little bit -- sorry for sticking on the Swedish margin, but just -- I think it's quite important to get just a sense of what's happening because you're talking about margin improvement, but what we can see on an adjusted basis, margin is going down. And you refer -- you highlighted in the report that building automation showing black numbers for the first time. Is there any other part of the Swedish business where we see adjusted EBITDA margins going up year-over-year here in Q1 that's worth mentioning?
We have a strong industrial sector. I think that -- also, we have not so many write-downs. But of course, we have to take in consideration companies -- sorry, projects that we took in 2024, 2025. They are, as I mentioned, of course, we haven't finished them all. So I can just repeat what I said. I think the industrial part is doing well. And I think other parts of geographic areas also, there have been an uneven situation, but I think they are catching up now, the southern part of Sweden and maybe Stockholm as well. So I don't have any other answer on that.
To add to that, that if we look at the different geographical areas, we are seeing, even on an adjusted level, improvements in a lot of the business areas.
Yes. And I could also maybe add that Sweden expect -- had a clearer -- more [indiscernible] expect than the other countries this quarter.
Yes.
And as I said, still working through projects taken in a tougher market environment. But also Sweden had a good pickup of the margins in the third month in the quarter in March.
And we had...
I think someone caught in your comment there.
Yes.
What did you say? Sweden had weather-related problems or?
No. The seasonality effects in Q1 was tougher in Sweden than in other -- our other countries in this quarter, but showed -- Sweden showed a very good pickup in March. So...
When it's very cold outside, even if we are often inside the buildings. But when it's cold outside, the whole pace of our industry is going down. And we had a very tough situation in January, February due to the weather. So I think you have to have that in mind as well.
Yes, tougher than normal, so to say, in that sense.
Tougher than normal, absolutely, with both cold and snow.
And is it possible to give any kind of comments on progress beginning of Q2? We're now end of April.
Sorry. You know the answer. Sorry. We will not give you any comments. But we had a strong March.
And my final question is on the cash flow. And it puzzles me a little bit the kind of level of how much tax you pay and the kind of difference you book in the P&L and what we see in the cash flow. Can you give some kind of reason why you're having such a low tax cost booked in the P&L versus how much you pay in the cash flow statement? It's been the theme now for quite a while.
Yes. I could say we have lots of entities, as you know, 150 entities, and from one quarter to another. We don't make year-end tax calculations in each quarter as we do in the full year and in Q4. And that's the main reason, I would say, that you can't draw the final conclusion on the tax level from a single quarter.
And how should we think going forward? Are you in a situation where you paid a little bit too much? And the taxes paid should come down? Or is it...
You can take the conclusions when you look at the numbers for the full year and calculate this -- that from 2026 also. We don't have a new pattern here.
There are no more questions at this time. So I hand the conference back to the speakers for any written questions.
Thank you. We do have a written question coming in here.
Has the number of electricians, plumbers, and similar tradespeople in the Nordic market declined in recent years? Or would you say that the overall capacity in your segment remains broadly unchanged?
No, I don't think it has declined. I don't think so. But on the other hand, I haven't those figures or numbers right here, but not decline, but maybe it's rather even. But I don't -- I'm not sure about that.
That was it for the written questions.
Thank you very much, everyone. Thank you.
We do have one more in the speaker queue, I think.
Uh-huh. Okay.
Okay. Thank you very much, everyone. Good work. Thank you.
Instalco — Q1 2026 Earnings Call
Instalco — Q4 2025 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Welcome to Instalco Q4 presentation, 2025.
[Operator Instructions]
Now I will hand the conference over to the speakers. Please go ahead.
Okay. Welcome to this presentation of Instalco's report for the fourth quarter and full year 2025. My name is Per Sjostrand, I'm CEO of Instalco. And with me today is our CFO, Christina Kassberg; and our Head of IR, Mathilda Eriksson.
The fourth quarter concludes a challenging year, but also marks an important shift driven by our own actions. As always, I will start with a short snapshot of Instalco today. We are a leading installation group across the Nordics with an established platform also in Germany. Our strength is our decentralization. Local companies close to customers, combined with common standards, tools and governance. With over 6,000 employees, we are exposed to market segments driven by long-term needs, such as energy efficiency, and electrification.
Over to Slide 3. First, for a quick glance at our LTM numbers, which for the fourth quarter also represents the full year. Net sales amounted to SEK 13.6 billion, and we ended the year with a backlog of SEK 9.5 billion, which represents a steady book-to-bill of about 70%, exactly where we want it to be. It allows us to be disciplined in the projects we take on, focusing on quality and profitability rather than growth for growth own sake.
Our EBITA for the full year amounted to SEK 800 million, corresponding to a margin of 5.9%. When adjusting for one-off costs taken in the first and second quarters, this would amount to SEK 875 million, corresponding to a margin of 6.4%. Despite the extraordinary circumstances around these one-offs, I believe that this is the cost of doing business in a project-based environment and we have, during the year, taken several steps to take down our risk.
With or without adjustments, we are, however, not satisfied with this level but the quarter shows that we are moving in the right direction. Service remained strong and again accounted for 38% of net sales in the fourth quarter. The strong cash flow in quarter 4 also -- as well as throughout the year, kept our LTM cash flow from operations above SEK 1 billion, even despite the decrease in earnings, showcasing our strong focus on improving working capital.
Next slide, yes. Well, let's move on to a quick summary from the quarter. Our improvement initiatives are beginning to deliver results. For the first time in 7 quarters, EBITA increased compared to previous year. We are proud of the progress, but not satisfied. The improvement is primarily driven by our own performance market conditions vary geographically and the installation market is late cyclical. We are not relying on the external environment. Instalco 2.0 is making a tangible difference in daily operations, sharper priorities, clearer accountability and more consistent follow-up. A focused approach to doing the right things, collectively and with precision.
Our financial position has strengthened and our leverage has come down significantly, improved earnings, improved POC ratio and a clear focus on cash flow are reinforcing the balance sheet and increasing financials as well as strategic flexibility.
So for next and now I will hand over to Christina, who will take you through our financial development in more detail.
Thanks, Per. Let's start off with looking at how our net sales and order backlog has developed during the fourth quarter of 2025. Net sales grew by 4.4% to almost SEK 3.8 billion. Currency had a negative impact on the outcome with minus 1.4%. Organic growth, on the other hand, turned positive at 4.9%, and we saw growth in both the reporting segments. Our order backlog also reported growth of 5.6% or 7.5% organically, again, impacted by FX. Most of the growth came from Norway, but we also saw a strongly increasing order intake from a few of our Finland-based subsidiaries that mainly work towards industrial clients. Especially for the Norwegian order growth, it is important to keep in mind that many of the projects taken have long durations. I would, therefore, caution against expecting each to quickly go to execution. .
In addition to the backlog, we saw our service business, which remains an important stabilizing factor. For the fourth quarter, service amounted to 38% of sales and at the same level for the full year. Then on to our earnings. EBITA in both millions and margin. Q4 tends to be seasonally strong with lots of projects wrapping up by the end of the year. This pattern continued also in 2025, though December saw activity going down for both ourselves and our customers due to the holiday period. In total, EBITA grew by 39% compared to last year to SEK 272 million. This corresponds to a margin of 7.2%. The higher margin and improved result are explained partly by prior year items affecting comparability and partly by improvement -- implemented operational improvements.
The outcome breaks the negative year-on-year EBITA trend observed over recent quarters. The adjusted EBITA margin is unchanged year-on-year in the context of a market that has pressured margins throughout the year, maintaining that level in Q4 reflects underlying operational improvements. It also marks a clear break in the pattern of year-on-year margin decline we have seen in recent quarters. The focus on margin improvement remains a key priority for the entire group. To break it down into more detail, over to a slide that summarizes segment Sweden in Q4.
Overall, net sales grew to SEK 2.6 billion with an organic growth of 6.6%. Acquired growth contributed with 1.3%. The order backlog was down by 3% compared to a year ago to SEK 6.6 billion. This, however, represent a sequential growth of SEK 300 million compared to the end of Q3. The EBITA amounted to SEK 180 million, corresponding to a margin of 6.8% compared to 5.5% last year. The stronger margin is the result of the segment no longer being burdened by last year's one-off costs combined with operational improvements.
Improved margins and earnings are evident across the majority of geographical areas. At the same time, performance continues to be weighed down by a persistently challenging market. When adjusting for the one-off costs of SEK 54 million, adjusted margin for the same quarter last year would have been 7.7%. The Swedish market is showing early cautious sign of recovery. particularly in the major cities where new projects are starting to move forward. At the same time, decision-making remains slow and conditions are still challenging in parts of the country with pressure on pricing in some regions.
Demand within technical consulting, automation and digitalization continues to strengthen providing early signals of gradual improvement despite a mixed industrial backdrop. But as always, it is important to keep in mind that installations is late cyclical. And now for a summary of the rest of Nordics segment. Overall, net sales were down slightly to SEK 1.1 billion due to FX effects. Organic growth amounted to 1.2%. The EBITA margin amounted to 7.8% compared to 5% last year or 6% last year, if adjusting for the one-off costs. The improvement was driven by both countries but primarily by Finland and in particular, by projects for industrial customers. The segment showed very strong development of the order backlog, which increased by 33%.
As I mentioned a few slides ago, this was primarily driven by Norway, which saw some for us larger orders come in during the year, but also in the quarter. In Norway, the market has stabilized following a weaker period with early signs of recovery, particularly in Oslo and the South regions supported by public investments in infrastructure, defense, health care and education. Competition remains intense, and the macro environment is still somewhat uncertain, with inflation and interest rate expectations affecting investment decisions.
Overall, the market is gradually stabilizing, but any recovery is likely to be gradual rather than fast.
In Finland, activity remains subdued, with the residential construction and larger private investments still on hold. Demand is mainly driven by renovation work, industrial projects and longer-term investments linked to the energy transition, defense and digital infrastructure, while a broader recovery is not expected in the near term.
And finally, a reminder that this segment will be split up in our external reporting starting from January 1, 2026. We will publish historical numbers according to the new segment reporting before our Q1 report.
Then on to the cash generation in the quarter. In Q4, cash flow from operations amounted to SEK 451 million. The slight decrease is attributable to last year's much higher adjustments for noncash items related to the one-off costs taken in Q4 2025. Q4 tends to be a period where we build up working capital due to the typically increased invoicing at the end of the year. So was the case also this year but I'm happy to report that we did so to a lesser extent than a year ago despite our increased top line and earnings. Taken together with a strong development throughout the previous quarter, this means we ended the year with a cash conversion of 108%, which is above our target.
This is the result of improved earnings and improved POC ratio and a clear focus on cash management within the full group. In total, the cash flow performance give us confidence in the direction and the quality of our execution. This cash flow profile strengthens our financial foundation and increases our flexibility going forward.
Then let's have a look at our performance on a rolling 12-month basis in relation to our financial targets. Our targets are defined over a business cycle. And in the current market, we continue to prioritize profitability and disciplined project selection over pure volume growth. Despite this, we ended the full year 2025 with a negative net sales development of only minus 0.7%. And an organic development of only minus 0.3%. The EBITA margin came in at 5.9% or if adjusted at 6.4%. It remains below our long-term ambition. We are not satisfied and are taking actions. These actions are making an impact as can be seen in the quarter.
Operational cash flow was again strong with a conversion rate of 108% above our target, supported by ongoing improvements in working capital efficiency. Our leverage remains somewhat over our own long-term target of 2.5x net debt to EBITDA as it currency sits now at 2.8x. This represents a significant deleveraging compared to 3.3x at the end of Q3. The Board proposes a dividend of SEK 0.5 per share based on the current numbers of shares, which amounts to SEK 133 million. And of course, we remain firmly focused on delivering on our climate commitments as part of our long-term targets.
By that, over to you, Per.
Thank you, Christina. Let's talk about Fabri for 1 slide here. And first of all, I want to point out, momentum in Germany remains strong. Our German platform, Fabri continues to develop well and has made 2 further acquisitions during the quarter. This means Fabri has now reached 22 companies in total, underscoring the steady progress of the platform. As with previous additions, these companies are a strong fit with the Fabri model. They are entrepreneurial led, technical skilled and firmly rooted in their local markets. Together, they strengthen both the platform's technical capabilities and also its geographic reach.
The collaboration between Instalco and Fabri is built on a long-term agreement and the next step in ownership under our multiphase model is gradually approaching. At the same time, execution is very much about timing and preparation. And based on our current assessment, Step 2 is expected to become relevant in the second half of 2026. Overall, the development in Germany continues to confirm that our platform strategy is working and that the market offers attractive opportunities for long-term profitable growth.
And then I have a theme here on next slide, I think. I wanted to do a brief look back at the year we have just added to the books. As I said in the beginning on this presentation, the fourth quarter concludes a challenging year, but also marks an important shift driven by our own actions. 2025 was a challenging year in the market. We all know that with uneven demand and limited visibility at times. We also started the year with setbacks, including Northvolt. But what really defines this year is not the market we were given, but the choices we made within it. We deliberately reset the fundamentals of the business.
A lot of focus went into Instalco 2.0, which we introduced to you during our Q3 call. This includes better follow-up planning and execution and more structured way of driving improvements across the group. Getting the basic right matters, especially in a decentralized project business like ours.
We also choose discipline over volume. We are not chasing growth at any price, but focusing on margins, risk and the right projects with the right customers. That is both a profitability choice and a risk management choice. And this focus on discipline has also shaped our approach to expansion. Execution comes before expansion. That applies to organic growth, but also to M&A. We completed the 1 acquisition during the year, Alf Naslunds Eltjans in Ornskoldsvik. This was a very deliberate choice. The region is seeing positive momentum with several major upcoming investments and Alf Naslunds Eltjans gives us a strong local platform. It strengthens our position in the region and our multi-disciplinary offering, allowing us to deliver more complete solutions to customers locally.
At the same time, we have remained selective and patient elsewhere. On the strategic side, we took several important steps during the year. In March, we took possession of our minority stake in Fabri, giving us exposure to a new market while keeping risk balanced. Over the summer, we extended our credit facility to a total of SEK 3.4 billion, securing financial strength and flexibility in a time when that really matters. Taken together, this has been a year of deliberate choices. Choices to focus, to be disciplined and to make sure we execute well before we move on to the next step. And those choices are now starting to shape where Instalco is heading next.
While we have made a lot of changes during the year, our focus has, of course, remained on our core business. Day in and day out, our subsidiaries are out in the market competing for and delivering complex installation projects. These slides show a small selection of 4 important orders secured during the year in a market that has been anything but easy. What they have in common is not size, but quality. They are technically demanding projects, often multidisciplinary with long-term customers and higher requirements of execution, planning and collaboration. They also reflect the parts of the market where activity continues even in a downturn, such as health care, public infrastructure, retail with scale and secure or specified facilities.
And for us, these orders are a clear confirmation that our model works. When the market is challenging, it is the subsidiaries with strong local positions, technical competence and discipline that continue to win the right kind of business. I'm assuming most of you have seen this slide before, so I won't go through it in detail again. But Instalco 2.0 is the core of where our efforts have gone during the past few months. So it's worth a short recap. At its heart, Instalco 2.0 is about protecting what has always worked for us. And that means local entrepreneurship, closeness to the customer and fast decision-making, while being more deliberate in how we run and support the business. We are raising the bar on one day-to-day execution, building stronger capabilities across the organization and taking a clear, more hands-on approach where performance is not where it should be.
The goal is, of course, stronger execution more predictable outcomes and a more resilient group over time without moving decision-making away from the subsidiaries. It's very important.
Slide 16. The slide illustrates how Instalco 2.0 has progressed over the past 2 quarters. During Q3, the focus was on setting the direction of defining the framework, aligning the operational model and establishing common principles. That work was about creating the conditions to execute in a more disciplined and consistent way. In Q4, the focus shifted to implementation. Parts of the framework are now being applied in daily operations, and we are working systematically on rolling across the group. This is not about launching a new process or sending out material but about gradually changing ways of working and how performance is follow up. We are seeing tangible efforts and better visibility across all levels of the organization, earlier identification of deviations in results and projects forecast and a more disciplined approach to risk and working capital.
Issues are surfaced challenging and addressed rather than postponed. While we are still early in the journey, we are starting to see these improvements reflected clearly in operation and to some extent also in the numbers. And importantly, Instalco 2.0 is not a one-off initiative. The ongoing phase is about maintaining momentum throughout or through continuous improvement, structured follow-up and capability building, including targeted training and leadership initiatives. This is about establishing a new way of working for the long term, not delivering a short-term project.
Okay. I think this is the last slide and a summary. So let's return to the quarter and look at the key takeaways. As we have mentioned, for the first time in 7 quarters, EBITA is growing, which marks an important shift after a prolonged period of pressure. At the same time, market conditions remain varied across geographies, which continues to require a disciplined and selective approach. Operationally, we delivered strong cash flow and further strengthen our financial positions, reflecting improved control and focus in the business. Instalco 2.0 continues to progress according to plan. The rollout is ongoing and we are starting to see clear effects in daily operations with sharper priorities, clear accountability and more consistent follow-up across the organization.
The focus is on doing the right things, together and with precision and reinforcing these ways of working over time. All in all, we are taking steps in the right direction from a stronger financial position.
So -- and with that, I would like to thank you for joining on this call -- joining in on this call and now open up for questions.
[Operator Instructions]
The next question comes from Oscar Ronnkvist from SEB.
2. Question Answer
So -- just my first question would be on the Swedish contract sales. I think they see an extraordinarily strong here in Q4. So I just wondered if there are any temporary effects or if we should extrapolate the strength here, I mean the market is still pretty cautious and this is a late cyclical business. And also considering that you highlight the seasonality going into Q1 then. So just wanted to hear if I'm reading too much into that or not.
The organic growth in Q4 was encouraging, particularly given the, I would say, the market environment we have discussed and we all are aware of. It reflects a combination of good order intake earlier in the year, but also solid execution in the quarter. And I would say also the fact that we continue to see demand in parts of the market that are less exposed to new build activity.
Maybe adding to that, that our selling process has also developed. So I think we're on the right track.
All right. So underlying strength sort of or temporary positivity effect?
We don't believe that. We think it's slightly better market, better off -- more offensive selling process and a combination of that.
Got it. Next one just more on the working capital release here. So I think there was almost SEK 200 million now in 2025 despite having a pretty flattish organic growth. Do you expect any setback on the working capital levels? Or should we see this as a new normal?
As you are aware of, when it comes to leverage, for example, if you look at that it's a combination when it comes to how we go forward on both net debt and the EBITDA components. But through cash flow forecast, we have worked hard with it during the quarter and the full year, we have given out measures, and we have really focused on it, and we will continue to do that. Cash flow and working capital improvements, it's hard work, and we continue, and we are happy that we have made a positive conclusion like this for the end of the year, 108% in cash conversion.
Yes. And if I can just add on to that as well. I think we can definitely see several components of this really improving. We have an improved percentage of completion ratio, which is very positive as well as several different components of the working capital so this has been a focus area from the entire group throughout the year, and we're happy to see it pay off.
All right. Last question just on the market outlook. You had some mixed confidence or some comments about the sort of cautious confidence that you say in the report and implied order intake, as we have spoken about, seems pretty strong. And I believe also that you mentioned in earlier calls that you don't want to fill up the order book with low-margin projects naturally. But should we expect that when the orders are accelerating a bit here that the project margins on new orders have improved regarding competition?
It's hard to say, of course, but it's in the right direction, I think. And we are talking also a lot about partnering projects. We are talking about the service sector. But I will say that market conditions remain mixed and of course, we try to address our efforts towards the market where we think we can have gain most, of course. So it's still weak in certain new build segments, but there is a demand in infrastructure service, as I mentioned, more complex installation that is also something we look into. And I think we sit very well in that. We are -- it's more stable with those more complex installations, and we see signs of gradual improvement.
But the recovery is uneven and varies by geographies and customer segments, of course. So we have to be on the right place and take the right projects and the right customers, as we mentioned.
The next question comes from Carl Ragnerstam from Nordea.
It's Carl here from Nordea. A few questions from my side as well. Firstly, in Rest of Nordics, you mentioned that the margin was partly at least driven by industrial clients in Finland. So I wonder if you could give more flavors around whether these are several projects? Was it completion now during Q4, meaning that you released some POC boosting the margins? Or do you think that the project will continue at the current level for 1, 2, 3 more quarters.
I think we see a rather stable market within the industrial part of our business. I mean, there is still several investments that we are looking forward to, and there are signs, as we mentioned, of new -- also new projects coming up. So I think we can say that -- and we will have a major part or a large part of our businesses are in the industrial, what we call industrial sector right now. And I think we will see continuously improvements but also new projects coming out there. So several projects, good order intake that is something we are looking forward to.
Yes, I think you can see that also written in the report on the Rest of Nordics segment that Norway, of course, was the majority of the strong order intake, but also some industrial leading companies in Finland saw good growth as well.
I was referring to the margin though, not order intake in Rest of Nordics.
I mean, in general, the industrial projects have slightly at least a higher margin maybe other parts, but also I think there are -- I think they did good in quarter 3 as well. So I think it's a rather stable margin. Those companies have a rather stable margin. And I think -- or I know that also the business area has a little bit higher margins. So that's also -- and we -- I mean, there's no reason for changing the opinion about that. And I think that will continue to leverage a little bit higher margin.
That is good. In terms of the...
Sorry, Carl. We have to mention the seasonality in Q1, of course. That's also something to addressing the industry or the more heavy industry of this sector. They have a slower pace in quarter 1. I want just to mention that. So -- but they are catching up in Q2 and Q3 and Q4.
That's very clear. In terms of cash conversion and you referred a little bit about it. Of course, you were referring to a very positive number coming down by quarter-over-quarter, year-over-year as well. So first, do you see that you are where you want to be on the POC right now? Because you've obviously done a lot of measures over the past years. And also secondly, in the cash conversion in the quarter, you've taken some big or large contracts over the past year. Start-up of these tends to come with an upfront payment. So is cash conversion boosted by upfront payments to any extent in the quarter versus sort of the Instalco 2.0 effect or any other?
It's a mix of everything, I would say, Carl. First of all, the cash flow and the cash conversion and the working capital in the quarter was strong. And as you mentioned, variation in work in progress or the POC ratio is very, very important here. But then we -- you also -- as you know, we tend to tie up more accounts receivable at the end of the year. We have good invoicing and that ties up accounts receivable. But in less extent, I would -- let's say compared to previous quarter.
But in the end, what we have done and what we are working with is more effective, I would say, use of payment terms, in Instalco, 2.0 and our measures around this, this is an important theme and a lot of best practice in contractual payments and ensuring compliance across all units. So measures on Instalco's 2.0 and a good work in the entire organization.
That is very clear here. And also looking at service sales in Sweden, particularly, seems to be down a bit year-over-year. Of course, you have done some measures with discontinuing sales. It's hard to see the underlying data. But do you still see a sort of stable/sluggish market in services? Or what should we read into that number?
Service, we ended up for the group, 38% in the quarter and approximately the same numbers in the quarter -- in quarter and the full year, a little less in the group smaller numbers in Sweden than in the Rest of the Nordics. This is a measure we have worked around for many years to stabilizing and have this strengthening part with service in our businesses. And we will continue that. And it's exactly -- we can't say exactly the numbers for the coming year, and we are not giving forecast. But it is a priority to have a stabilized and service business.
Yes, exactly. And I think also we can say that, that was a strategy that when we saw the market downturn a couple of years ago, it was a strategy to strengthen up the service sector. Of course, when and if, of course, but I think so. When more projects is coming out, it can be so that we are now focusing more on projects and the service part is going down slightly. But that depends on how much -- how many projects that will come out there and the price level, of course, of them because the best is a mix, a healthy mix, but also the possibility to change almost from day to day between projects and service, so...
The next question comes from Karl Bokvist from ABG Sundal Collier.
First one on Fabri. Is it possible to give an update on kind of a run rate revenue level for the entire Fabri group?
I mean, I can say so much that they have performed well. And of course, they now have 22 companies, as we said, they have a turnover of EUR 150 million. I mean they are growing. And as I think we have mentioned before, they had at least the margin that we have in the Nordics, and I will say at least because they are performing well. So yes. So yes, that's what I can say. We are satisfied, so to speak.
Understood. And also, I noticed in the report also on Fabri, you now say you expect to close it by second -- or during second half? Any particular reason or decision, why in the second half compared to perhaps first half before?
I say it's just a little administrative work. So it's nothing that has changed. So it's just that we think that we have to go through the figures, of course. We have to see that everything is okay. They are a little bit, not slower, but they have more administrative work down -- to do down there. So it's just -- yes, almost a coincidence, but the figures are fixed and we have to just look into them.
Understood. And my second question is on -- it's a bit of a follow-up to Oscar's regarding contract sales. So in the past, if we look back a few years, you have been a project execution installation group, and this is a part of a market where you have historically also had good margins. So contract sales now growing, good to see. I'm just curious to hear about your view on kind of pricing environment right now compared to what you can do by just well as you said, doing better things internally from the Instalco 2.0 model, et cetera?
Good question. One of the main targets and one of the pillars, I would say, Instalco 2.0 is also to improve our selling capacity, as I mentioned, and pricing goes with that. So it's one thing that you calculate projects, but the pricing is another expertise, I will say. And that is also -- that's something we have added to our Instalco 2.0 and what we are doing now.
So hopefully, of course, and that's also our -- both our view of it and our wish, of course, but still, we will work a lot with what we call pricing and value-added pricing, and that is something we have picked up now and looking forward to. So with that said, you can just -- maybe you can imagine that this is on the highest on our agenda.
[Operator Instructions]
The next question comes from Johan Lonnqvist Sunden from DNB Carnegie.
Few questions from my side as well. Just curious to hear a little bit of your thoughts on FTE count. I note that the year-end FTE numbers was down some 60% versus end of Q3. Have you planned any further FTE reductions going into the beginning of '26 and potentially some kind of restructuring charges related to that?
I mean, we have not planned. There's no FTE savings or what you call it as a program going on. We have our -- we launched a couple of cost savings programs during 2024 and maybe 2025 in the beginning. It's more like cost control right now around every subsidiary. And we are doing our business plans with these head counting as well. But we have no specific plans to reduce FTEs or so. But of course, it depends on the market. And one of our main points here is to -- and we have talked about it during this call as well, to act very quick and quickly respond on if we see ups or downs in the product intake.
And I can also add that, of course, we have a very -- we have a big mix of companies in our portfolio. And we have strong companies with a high profitability, and we have companies that are struggling. So we work individual with a company as a company where they are and where we need to make reductions, if that is the case, we work with cost control and et cetera. But we have a mixed portfolio and the geographies is different and the market difference in the different countries and regions, so...
It's a day-to-day business, yes.
Make sense. And another margin drag that you have been fighting with for quite some time is the building automation startup. Possible to give any color on where you are with regards to margins in that area?
Did you ask about -- I didn't hear clearly, about Intec or in Norrtech or?
In Norrtech.
In Norrtech. Okay. So I mean we know that the demand for their services are high. And I think also that what we can see now is they are not catching up. This is start up. And start-ups also start with empty hands. But what they are doing now is -- and we can see that they are less dragging now than in Q3. So I think we see signs of really, really recovering in that company and in that segment. And they now are more stabilized in the market. I think they are well known now, and that means that they have more tenders or offering to do and customers start to understand that we have this in-house.
So we are looking forward to the development of in Norrtech and of course, Intec as well during 2026.
Okay, is it breakeven yet?
Let's phrase it like this. Today, they are approximately 90 consultants in our automation start-up businesses. They are still negative, but they are dragging less than in Q3. They are making better in Q4, but they are still negative. But what we are saying is that the margin is improving step-wise, as we expect.
Can you give something on the balance sheet of what it looks like?
I mean I think when we acquire -- in part 2, we will acquire 27%. I mean, then we will have a more better view and also it's more important for us. But of course, they have taken up a loan, but it's not -- it is very, very -- it's small figures today. So I think we will come back after Q2 here and explaining the situation in Fabri. But it's nothing to worry about.
They are very well capitalized.
Yes, exactly.
And they have a strong balance sheet.
There are no more questions at this time. So I hand the conference back to the speakers for written questions and any closing comments.
We have no written questions at this time. So Per, if you want to wrap up?
Yes. With that, I want to thank you for dialing in and for your questions. And of course, before we close this call, I want to take the opportunity to truly thank the people that make up Instalco for their work, responsibility and commitment demonstrating throughout the year, especially in what we call Instalco 2.0. So give credit where credit is due. We have seen good progress, and there is more to do and more to come. So thank you very much.
Instalco — Q4 2025 Earnings Call
Instalco — Q3 2025 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Welcome to the Instalco Q3 Presentation 2025. [Operator Instructions]
Now I will hand the conference over to the speakers. Please go ahead.
Hi, everyone, and welcome to this presentation of Instalco's report for the third quarter of 2025. My name is Per Sjostrand, CEO at Instalco, and with me today is also our CFO, Christina Kassberg. And in fact this is my first time fully presenting a quarterly report since 2021 and I'm glad to be back. As usually, let's start with a brief overview of Instalco today.
Instalco is one of the leading installation groups in Sweden, Norway and Finland and also with a presence in Germany. Our decentralized model is a core strength empowering our more than 150 local companies to act independently while benefiting from strong governance and shared tools. And with more than 6,000 employees across the group, we support the green transition every day. The demand for our services continues to be underpinned by powerful long-term market trends.
And then we can switch slide. First, for a quick glance at our LTM numbers. Net sales amounted to SEK 13.4 billion and we ended the quarter with a backlog of SEK 9 billion, which represents a steady book-to-bill of close to 70% and that's exactly where I want to be. Our order backlog, as I mentioned, is about 70% of our revenue and I think that's very good. The reason why I think so is that you should not be, so to speak, fully booked when there are early signs of a market return.
When adjusting for one-off costs taken in the past 3 quarters, our EBITA amount to SEK 863 million corresponding to a margin of 6.4%. As you might know, we are aiming for 8% margin and we are driving the business in that direction. In Q3, service remained strong and accounted for 37% of our net sales. And the strong cash flow in Q3 kept our LTM cash flow from operations above SEK 1 billion even despite the decrease in earnings showcasing our strong focus on improving working capital.
So the next slide, please. Then let's move on to a quick summary from the third quarter. In summary, we are reporting numbers below last year's. On the positive side, we report strong operational cash flow and order intake is stable despite our cautious approach. But to speak frankly, it's not good enough. Internally, I have been very clear that I have 3 priorities right now and that is margin, margin and margin. Margin is, as you know, the basis for high cash flow, low net debt/EBITA; but is also a good sign of high quality, efficiency, stability and last, but not least, it gives pride among our team members.
Margin improvement is our highest priority, as I said, in the short term as well as in the long term. In the quarter, we also introduced a new country-based organization and we are working on an update operational model, I will come back to that, by which we are creating a clear management structure, governance and follow-up. And as I said, this I will come back to later in the presentation.
But for now, I will hand over to Christina, who will take you through our financial development in more detail.
Thank you, Per. Let's start off with looking at how our net sales and order backlog has developed during Q3. Net sales was down by 3.7% to SEK 3 billion with an organic decline of 3.3%. Organic growth was down in both reporting segments, but more in Sweden. Currency had a negative impact of 1% primarily due to the weakening of the Norwegian kroner and the euro. On the other hand, our order backlog grew by 6.4% organically with the biggest contribution coming from the Rest of Nordics segment and there primarily Norway with several, for us, larger projects coming in. Several of these are planned to run for years.
The market is fragmented and still characterized by clear regional differences. Activity increased somewhat during the quarter, particularly in metropolitan areas. This is important as these regions tend to be the engines for demand in the other areas of the countries. Price pressure remains in several segments, but the increased supply of project provides better opportunities for selection and a focus on profitability. In addition to the backlog, we have our service business, which remains an important stabilizing factor. In our service business, we saw growth of 2% in absolute numbers in the quarter. This resulted in service making up 37% of sales.
Then on to our earnings, EBITA in both millions and margin. Q3 tends to be seasonally weak due to the summer holiday period and this was the case also this year. We saw a weak July and August, but a stronger September. In total, EBITA amounted to SEK 180 million corresponding to a flat margin of 6%. No one-offs were taken in the quarter. The earnings were up in segment Rest of Nordics, but down in Sweden. In the former, we saw increasing sales and result in Finland, primarily due to the projects for industrial clients.
Norway, however, reported somewhat lower sales, but a strengthening margin. In Sweden, we saw improvements from low levels in areas such as, for example, West, South and Stockholm; but a decrease in the middle of Sweden and the industrial discipline. As Per has made very clear, we are not satisfied with this margin level and getting our margin back up is a key priority for the entire Instalco Group at the moment.
To break it down into more detail, over to a slide that summarizes segment Sweden in Q3. Overall, net sales were down somewhat to SEK 2.1 billion with an organic development of minus 5.7%. The order backlog was down by 2% to SEK 6.3 billion. The EBITA margin amounted to 5.1% compared to 5.5% last year. The Swedish market shows early signs of recovery especially in major cities with several large projects starting up. Technical consulting is strengthening with more automation and digitalization projects emerging. Conditions remain weak in parts of Central and Northern Sweden with low pricing and some overcapacity. Industrial activity is mixed. Power and defense projects are stable with larger investments remain delayed.
And now for a summary of the Rest of Nordics segment. Overall, net sales were down slightly to SEK 968 million with an organic decrease of 2.2% Acquisitions contributed with a growth of 0.1%. The EBITA margin amounted to 7.7% compared to 6.9% last year. The segment showed very strong development of the order backlog, which increased by 29.9%. As I mentioned a few slides ago, this was primarily driven by Norway. We saw some, for us, larger orders come in.
In Norway, the market has stabilized with early signs of recovery especially in Oslo and the South. Public investments continue to drive demand while housing shows cautious improvement ahead of next year. In Finland, activity remains weak but is stabilizing slightly in Helsinki with energy and defense projects expected to support demand over the medium term. As announced end of August, this segment will be split up in our external reporting starting from January 1, 2026.
Then on to the cash generation in the quarter. In Q3, cash flow from operations increased by 12% and amounted to SEK 133 million despite the lower earnings. Almost all components of working capital improved in Q3 compared to the same quarter last year primarily driven by accounts receivables and contract assets. Further down the cash flow analysis, we find the major expected outflows during the quarter; SEK 160 million in payments related to buyback of minority shares in a few subsidiaries, in line with previously agreed option structures and SEK 67 million in payment related to Fabri, which is a performance-related payment fulfilled for step 1 where we acquired 24%.
Once again, we are showing that disciplined execution pays off. The strong operational cash flow in the quarter reflects our continued focus on efficiency and working capital management. Then let's go over to our performance on a rolling 12-month basis in relation to our financial targets. Our targets are defined over a business cycle and in the current market, we continue to prioritize profitability and disciplined project selection over pure volume growth. The adjusted EBITA margin came in at 6.4%. It remains below our long-term ambition. We are not satisfied and are taking actions.
Operational cash flow was again strong with a conversion rate of 112% supported by ongoing improvements in working capital efficiency. Our leverage remains above our own long-term target of 2.5x net debt to EBITDA as expected following the payments in the quarter and typical seasonality fluctuations. The new credit facility agreed last quarter demonstrates continued confidence from our banking partners and secures long-term financial flexibility. And of course we remain firmly focused on delivering on our climate commitments as part of our long-term targets.
By that, I hand over to you, Per, again.
Okay. Thank you, Christina. A special thanks for your hard work with the cash management very well. I'm very satisfied with that. Going over to our subsidiary in Germany, Fabri, and the momentum in Germany remains strong. Fabri has now reached 20 companies, adding 3 new members to the group since our last report and each of them fits the model perfectly; entrepreneur driven, technically skilled, regionally anchored. Together, they contribute close to EUR 19 million in annual sales and expand both Fabri's technical scope and geographic footprint. It's another clear sign that our platform strategy in Germany is working and that the market continues to offer compelling opportunities for profitable growth.
So please, next slide and we go on to the quarter's CEO theme. Instalco 2.0 is our vision of the next Instalco. It's about taking what has made us strong and refining it, sharpening how we work, how we lead and how we deliver results. And this is not a single change, but a broader concept that ties together everything we are doing to take Instalco to the next level. We are building on our strength, but with an updated approach, a clear structure and higher ambition.
So let's move to Slide #13. In recent years, performance has not fully met our ambitions and we are taking decisive actions to accelerate the business and realize our full potential. Since Instalco was founded, we built a reputation as a best-in-class company with strong operational discipline translating into solid margins. Of course the macroeconomic environment has been challenging, but our ambitions to be the best-in-class goes beyond external comparison. It's about continuously raising the bar for ourselves. And our goal is to become a world-class company in operational excellence driving ongoing improvements at every level of the organization.
So by delivering on this, we will increase margins, strengthen our balance sheet and ensure a sustainable profitable long-term growth. And then I think we can move over to next slide, right? Since I rejoined the company in an operational role in August, we have worked with focus and urgency to define the next phase of our journey. When I commented the Q2 report, I showed you this slide and it remains just as valid today. Our operational priorities are clear, firmly addressing underperforming business units, increase operational efficiency and strengthen our organizational capabilities.
We are in the process of launching a target program designed to sharpen execution and accelerate progress toward our strategic goals. And I will now outline some of the key initiatives underway. To address underperforming companies, we are introducing a new framework designed to provide more tailored support for our businesses. We evaluate each company both financially and operationally taking a hands-on approach that is mindful of their specific needs and maturity. We are also establishing an operational baseline in key areas such as costing and pricing ensuring robust processes while preserving local flexibility.
And this is not about central control. It's about reinforcing our decentralized model by setting clear standards that enable consistent high performance across the group. The goal is to reduce person dependence and create a shared language around performance and excellence. And the framework applies to all Instalco companies while allowing each to leverage its entrepreneurial strengths and local context. The strongest units may see little day-to-day change, but all will benefit from shared tools, benchmarks and insights. And over time, this will form a true gold mine of best practice or Instalco toolbox enabling every company within the group to learn, grow and perform at its best.
And I say the culture will sooner or later become a so-called change management culture meaning that the company will stay solid and firm through all kinds of market outlooks. Okay. Operational efficiency. A business model defines what we do and why, how we create value and make money. For Instalco, this is clear and established. Our operational model, on the other hand, is about how the processes, structures and capabilities we use to deliver that value every day. Every company has an operational model consciously or not.
What's new is that we are now taking a step back to review and define ours to see where it may need to evolve and to ensure we share a common understanding of how we do things across the group. Our value creation is ultimately done in each subsidiary, but it's through Instalco's operational model that we control the company's model which is why we must start there. There are some clear guidelines for us in this work. We will protect the entrepreneurial drive and local ownership that defines us, but also make sure roles and responsibilities are crystal clear.
Efficiency and financial performance come first and our way of working must be adaptable, clear and easy to apply across all markets. We have identified 4 boxes, which are all up for review. When it comes to developing the company portfolio, we are moving towards only doing acquisitions that create business value where 1 plus 1 is greater than 2. How we strengthen and develop our existing companies to their full potential is where we spend most of our time and resources at the moment. From the 1st of September, a new country-based organization is in place. We now have 3 main countries: Sweden, Norway and Finland alongside our fourth unit, Tech and Consulting.
The change gives us a clear structure and shorter decision path. It strengthens local collaboration and allows us to be more hands-on in following up on operations. Each country has a country manager with overall responsibility supported by a CEO, who drives operational excellence and supports the subsidiaries in improving performance. And I think this setup keeps the strength of our decentralized model while giving us a better control and alignment where it matters. It also gives our companies more opportunities to share experience and best practice within each country.
From the start of next year, our external reporting will also follow this new structure. In short, the country-based organization is a key step in making Instalco more focused, more coordinated and better equipped for profitable growth going forward. And to wrap up, this is a slide also from Q2, but still relevant and worth reminding of. Our entrepreneurial spirit remains the core of Instalco and, as you can see from the guidelines from our work on one of our previous slides, we are not abandoning the decentralization. That is a hallmark of Instalco.
So with that, let's return to Q3 and look at the key takeaways. We can clearly see a seasonal pattern or an ongoing market pressure in the numbers, but also that the activity has picked up especially towards the end of the quarter. Our absolutely top priority, as I have mentioned several times now, remains margin. That's where all our focus is right now, closely followed by continued discipline in working capital management. Cash flow once again was strong supported by solid operational performance and active working capital measures. Our service business and backlog keep growing, providing a good stability. In Germany, our platform Fabri continues to expand and now includes 20 local companies, a great example of the momentum we are seeing there. And finally, we are entering the next phase of our journey with a new country-based organization and a refined operational model that will strengthen execution across the group.
So with that, I would like to thank you for joining in on this call and now open up for your questions.
[Operator Instructions]
We do have some written questions we could start off with. The first one would be has the seasonal pattern in Q3 been more or less noticeable than in previous years?
I don't know. I wasn't so close to business last year, but what you say, Christina, is that maybe so?
I would say that the seasonal pattern this Q3 is very similar to Q3 previous year. Q3 is weak given the summer vacation period and that was the fact also this year. July and August was especially weak, but a stronger September.
September was very strong.
Another question. Your competitor, Bravida, is much more cautious in market outlook compared to Instalco. Where you are commenting improvement, they are more cautious. Is it due to different exposure of the companies?
I would say yes on that question because I think they are more into infrastructure maybe, but also maybe larger major projects than we are. We have also 37% now in -- I mentioned our backlog or order book, 70%. We can add to that also service of course. And I think they have a little different mix. So maybe they are a little bit more cautious about the market or the market outlook.
We have more written questions. Are you planning to increase capacity in order to meet the market's turnaround?
Increase capacity, I don't know. We are very cautious with overhead costs I will say. I think also we have been building up this tech side with Intec. Maybe you can call it that some kind of -- but it's a company-by-company decision I will say or country by country. So I think we are not addressing it from the headquarter in some way.
And then we have a final written question. Fabri seems to develop well as far as we can see. Are you confident in following your previously announced plan regarding ownership in Fabri? You state over time in your Q3 comments.
Absolutely 100%. We have an agreement and we will follow that agreement. So that's in our -- absolutely. We see a strong momentum, as I mentioned, in Germany and I think that's a very good investment.
Then I believe we have questions on the call.
The next question comes from Thomas Blikstad from Pareto Securities.
2. Question Answer
I was just wondering on sort of the margin and growth strategy here going forward. There was some deterioration when it comes to organic growth, but also we see some positive signs and stabilizing margin profile. I was wondering considering the outlook and what's your view on deteriorating organic growth going forward versus margin improvement expectations?
I can start. If you want to add something then, Christina. But we are -- as I mentioned several times, we are focusing fully on margin improvements. Organic growth, you can always have organic growth if you lower your price, but I don't want our staff out there lowering the price on projects. So we are focusing on margin and that is our main focus and of course it takes some time. But with that said, maybe the organic growth is not in some kind of focus areas for us now. So more focus on margin development, operational excellence and everything else that I have talked about. I don't know if you want to add something.
Yes, I can only add what you already said. We are still prioritizing margins over volume and the real organic growth will most probably come back as the market improves. And we are prioritizing the margin level in our strategy.
Perfect. And just a quick follow-up in terms of the strategy towards the margin target here long term. How much do you think -- I know it's difficult to quantify, but how much do you think you can gain from just internal improvements and how much are you dependent on then volumes returning back to sort of get some proper margin expansion here?
That's a good question and a million dollar question I would say as well. I think it's important to see it like of course we will focus on margin with a more efficient way of working, operational excellence, as I mentioned. Maybe, maybe, maybe this is the new normal market not as low as this. But I think coming back to 2015 or something when we had a really, really bull market. I'm not so sure about that that we will do that. So what we are doing, we are trying to see this as a new normal market and develop our margins from companies and everything else due to that fact. Of course we will and I think the market will recover in 2026 maybe Q2 or something and that would gain us.
But we are now sharpening up our capacity, our abilities, our skills and so on to meet that. So it's a mix so I can't say how much it is. But I think that improving margin is a mix between of course what we are doing. But also if we can I mean strengthen up our ability and everything else now; when the market comes back, I mean we have a double-sized possibility, I would say, to grow and also to increase margins. So it's so dependent on each other. But we have to think this is the way -- this is the new normal situation right now. What can we do? What do we have to change in our company to reach full potential and come back to 8%-plus margin.
Congratulations and good luck going forward.
Then we do have some more new written questions. The first seems to be in line with the previous one. Do you have a timeline for this new focus on margins?
I start right now, but the timeline goes forever. Hopefully, as I mentioned also, we can reach a culture in the company with what I call change management that we always, always will improve thinking about what can we do better. So that's the culture and the culture will slowly change, hopefully, and that takes a rather long time to reach a full potential. But I think it starts now.
Then another question regarding how you see margins near term. It says, in my opinion, the Q3 margin is weak especially in Sweden given the comparable from last year. In Q4, do you believe it's possible to improve the margin year-over-year for the group?
It's always possible, but I can't promise anything. But it's always possible and we are working very, very hard with it on a daily basis we are fully focused. If that gives a result in quarter 4, okay, fine. But it's a long-term work and incentive for us to work with this.
A question that says I believe this refers to the earn-outs. The SEK 10 million revaluation, does it impact Sweden or Rest of Nordics?
I can comment on that. The SEK 10 million in revaluation, the same level as previous quarter. So Q3 compared with Q3, the same level. It's a mix. We have made acquisitions in all countries in both segments so it's actually a mix. So we don't split it into details.
And then the final written question we have at the moment is how much cash is expected to go out in Q4 for earn-outs and minorities?
We don't comment on that specific number, but we continue our focus on strong operational efficiency when it comes to cash management. But as we look at it, we don't have any numbers there to calculate on and give flavor on that that will give effect in Q4.
There are no more questions at this time. So I hand the conference back to the speakers for closing comments.
Okay. Thank you very much, everyone. And looking forward to the next quarter 4 report. So thank you.
Instalco — Q3 2025 Earnings Call
Financial data from Instalco
Revenue
Revenue is the sum of all sales generated by a company, e.g. for its products or services.
Revenue (TTM) metric explainedDirect Costs
Direct costs are the costs incurred directly in connection with the manufacture of the product or service.
Gross Profit
Gross Profit indicates how much of the revenue remains in the company after deducting direct production costs. If the percentage share of sales is calculated, this is referred to as the gross margin.
Gross Profit metric explainedSelling and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) include all expenses for marketing and sales as well as the general administration of the company.
Research and Development Expense
Research and development costs (R&D) provide information on how much the company invests in the research and development of its products. The costs are particularly interesting as a percentage of revenue and in comparison to direct competitors.
EBITDA
EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization) is the company's earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. The EBITDA margin is calculated as a percentage of sales.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation represents reductions in the value of the company's assets (e.g. due to wear and tear on machinery).
EBIT (Operating Income)
EBIT (Earnings Before Interest and Taxes) is the company's profit before interest and taxes, also known as the operating income. The EBIT Margin is calculated as a percentage of sales at
.
Net Profit
Net Profit represents the profit or loss after deduction of all costs.
Net Profit metric explainedStocksGuide Premium
| Jun '26 |
+/-
%
|
||
| Revenue | 14,106 14,106 |
4%
4%
100%
|
|
| - Direct Costs | 6,653 6,653 |
4%
4%
47%
|
|
| Gross Profit | 7,453 7,453 |
4%
4%
53%
|
|
| - Selling and Administrative Expenses | 5,097 5,097 |
3%
3%
36%
|
|
| - Research and Development Expense | - - |
-
-
|
|
| EBITDA | 1,351 1,351 |
21%
21%
10%
|
|
| - Depreciation and Amortization | 548 548 |
2%
2%
4%
|
|
| EBIT (Operating Income) EBIT | 803 803 |
44%
44%
6%
|
|
| Net Profit | 393 393 |
43%
43%
3%
|
|
In millions SEK.
Don't miss a Thing! We will send you all news about Instalco directly to your mailbox free of charge.
If you wish, we will send you an e-mail every morning with news on stocks of your portfolios.
Instalco Stock News
Company Profile
Instalco AB engages in the provision of installation services. The company is headquartered in Stockholm, Stockholm and currently employs 6,197 full-time employees. The company went IPO on 2017-05-11. The firm offers installation and regular repairs of district heating, plumbing replacement, new construction and preventive maintenance; design, installation, and maintenance of electrical installation; technical solutions and installation of ventilation solutions for air treatment, air conditioning and indoor climate; design, installation and maintenance of water sprinklers; industrial pipe systems, machinery installation and installations of cooling systems, as well as installation of switchgear, transformers, busbars and power stations, among others. The services are designed mainly for commercial premises, housing, public construction, warehousing, offices and retail trade, as well as process industries. The firm operates in Sweden, Norway and Finland through numerous subsidiaries.
StocksGuide Premium
| Head office | Sweden |
| CEO | Mr. Sjoestrand |
| Employees | 6,163 |
| Website | instalco.se |


