Inter Parfums, Inc. Stock price
Compare with Peer Group
📊 Peer Group
📈 What is it?
The peer group consists of the companies with the most similar business model. They serve as a benchmark for putting a stock into context.
🧮 How is it selected?
Based on similarity of business model, meaning companies from the same industry with comparable products and a similar customer base. That's the only way to compare apples to apples.
🏛️ Why does it matter?
Whether a stock is cheap or expensive is best judged by comparison. A P/E of 18 or an EV/FCF of 20 can look cheap or expensive depending on the yardstick. The peer group gives you the most accurate one: companies with a similar business model that operate under the same conditions.
🎯 What does it mean for investors?
When a metric sits below the peer average, the stock is valued more cheaply relative to its competitors, and above the average more expensively. A discount to the peer group can be an opportunity, but it can also have a reason (for example lower growth). The comparison is a starting point, not a verdict.
Is Inter Parfums, Inc. a Top Scorer Stock based on the Dividend, High-Growth-Investing or Leverman Strategy?
As a Free StocksGuide user, you can view scores for all 9,120 stocks worldwide.
StocksGuide Premium
StocksGuide Unlimited
Key metrics
📘 Market Capitalization
📈 What is it?
Market capitalization shows how much a company is currently worth on the stock market.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It helps classify companies by size (Large, Mid, Small Cap) and indicates their market presence and relative stability.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Large-cap companies tend to be more stable, often pay dividends, but may grow more slowly.
- Smaller firms may offer higher growth potential but come with more volatility.
- Market capitalization is a useful indicator of company size — but not a measure of whether a stock is undervalued or overvalued.
📘 Enterprise Value (EV)
📈 What is it?
Enterprise Value represents the total cost to acquire a company — including its debt and excluding its cash reserves.
🧮 How is it calculated?
(= Market Cap + Net Debt)
🏛️ Why is it important?
EV gives a more complete picture of a company's value than market cap alone and is used in key valuation ratios like EV/FCF or EV/Sales.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Enterprise Value shows the true cost of buying a company, including all financial obligations.
- It is more accurate than just looking at market cap, especially when comparing companies with different levels of debt or cash.
- Professional investors prefer EV-based multiples because they better reflect the company’s full financial footprint.
📘 Net Debt
📈 What is it?
Net Debt shows how much debt remains after subtracting a company’s available cash reserves.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It indicates how dependent a company is on borrowed money and how easily it can service its debt in the short term.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Low or negative net debt signals financial strength and flexibility.
- Companies with strong cash positions are better positioned in crises.
- High net debt increases financial risk — especially in environments with rising interest rates or economic downturns.
📘 Cash
📈 What is it?
Cash represents all liquid assets a company can access immediately — including cash, bank deposits, and short-term investments.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It reflects a company’s financial flexibility and resilience — enabling investments, buybacks, or buffer in downturns.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A strong cash position means greater room for maneuver and crisis resistance.
- Cash-rich companies can invest, pay down debt, or repurchase shares.
- But excess idle cash might indicate a lack of growth opportunities.
📘 Shares Outstanding
📈 What is it?
Shares outstanding represent the total number of a company’s shares currently held by investors — excluding treasury stock.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It’s the basis for key metrics like Earnings Per Share (EPS), Market Capitalization, or the Price/Earnings ratio (P/E).
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Fewer shares in circulation typically increase earnings per share — making each share more valuable.
- Share buybacks reduce the number of shares and boost per-share metrics.
- Issuing new shares does the opposite — diluting shareholder value and lowering per-share figures.
📘 Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E)
📈 What is it?
The P/E ratio shows how many times a company's earnings per share are reflected in its current share price — in other words, how "expensive" the stock appears relative to its profits.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
The P/E ratio is one of the most widely used valuation metrics. It helps investors assess whether a stock appears cheap or expensive compared to its earnings power.
🧮 Calculation
📊 P/E (TTM) = Based on earnings from the last 12 months (Trailing Twelve Months):🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low P/E may indicate undervaluation — or signal underlying issues.
- A high P/E may reflect strong growth expectations — or an overvalued stock.
📘 Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S)
📈 What is it?
The P/S ratio shows how much investors are paying for $1 of the company’s revenue – regardless of profitability.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
P/S is especially useful for evaluating growth companies or businesses not yet profitable. It reflects how the market values the company’s sales.
🧮 Calculation
Market Cap = $3.65b | Revenue (TTM) = $1.50b
Market Cap = $3.65b | Estimated Revenue = $1.52b
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low P/S may indicate undervaluation — or low profitability.
- A high P/S can reflect strong growth expectations — or excessive optimism.
- Especially helpful when evaluating companies where profits are low, volatile, or negative.
📘 Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales)
📈 What is it?
EV/Sales shows how much investors are paying for $1 of revenue — considering not just equity, but also debt and cash. It’s the capital structure–adjusted version of the P/S ratio.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It’s ideal for comparing companies with different levels of debt. It reflects a company's true cost relative to its revenue.
🧮 Calculation
Enterprise Value = $3.58b | Revenue (TTM) = $1.50b
Enterprise Value = $3.58b | Forward Revenue = $1.52b
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- EV/Sales allows for capital structure–neutral company comparisons.
- A lower ratio may indicate undervaluation; a higher one may signal strong growth expectations or overvaluation.
- Especially helpful when evaluating high-growth companies with low or negative earnings.
📘 Enterprise Value to Free Cash Flow (EV/FCF) | ex SBC
📈 What is it?
EV/FCF compares a company’s enterprise value with its free cash flow. The metric therefore shows the multiple of current free cash flow at which a company is valued. EV/FCF ex SBC additionally accounts for stock-based compensation (SBC). While SBC does not represent a direct cash outflow, issuing shares as compensation can dilute existing shareholders. Therefore, SBC is deducted from free cash flow in this adjusted version.
🧮 How is it calculated?
EV/FCF ex SBC = Enterprise Value ÷ (Free Cash Flow (TTM) − SBC)
🏛️ Why is it important?
EV/FCF provides a valuation based on free cash flow and therefore complements earnings-based valuation metrics such as the P/E ratio. The ex SBC version additionally accounts for the economic impact of stock-based compensation and provides a more conservative view from a shareholder perspective.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low EV/FCF means that enterprise value is low relative to current free cash flow. The reasons should always be considered in the context of the company and its industry.
- A high EV/FCF means that enterprise value is high relative to current free cash flow. This can, for example, reflect high growth expectations or temporarily weak cash generation.
- When SBC is positive and adjusted free cash flow remains positive, EV/FCF ex SBC is generally higher than the standard EV/FCF.
- The metric is particularly useful for companies with relatively stable and predictable cash flows.
- If free cash flow is negative or very low, EV/FCF has limited usefulness and should not be interpreted like a standard valuation multiple.
📘 Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B)
📈 What is it?
The P/B ratio compares a company’s market value to its book value — showing how much investors are paying for each dollar of net assets.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
P/B is commonly used for asset-heavy industries like banks or industrials. It helps assess whether a stock is trading above or below its net asset value.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A P/B below 1 may signal undervaluation — or weak profitability.
- A P/B above 1 implies the market expects future value creation (e.g., brand, IP, growth).
- Best used for companies with tangible assets and strong balance sheets.
📘 Dividend per Share (DPS)
📈 What is it?
Dividend per Share shows how much cash a company pays out to shareholders for each share they own – usually on an annual or quarterly basis.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
DPS is the absolute value of the payout per share – crucial for income-focused investors and dividend strategies.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A stable or growing DPS often signals a strong, shareholder-friendly business.
- DPS alone doesn’t tell you how attractive the payout is – the stock price also matters (→ see Dividend Yield).
- Long-term dividend growth is often a hallmark of high-quality companies – like the dividend aristocrats.
📘 Dividend Yield
📈 What is it?
Dividend yield shows how large a company’s dividend is in relation to its current share price.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It allows investors to compare dividend payouts across stocks, regardless of price or payout size.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A stable yield can reflect reliable distributions.
- Comparing 1Y and 5Y yield shows whether dividend growth keeps pace with stock price appreciation.
- A low yield isn’t always negative – it can signal strong past performance or growth focus.
📘 Dividend Growth
📈 What is it?
Dividend growth shows how much a company has increased its dividend per share over time.
🧮 How is it calculated?
5Y: Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR)
🏛️ Why is it important?
Consistently rising dividends are often a sign of financial strength and shareholder orientation – especially relevant for long-term investors.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Stable dividend growth is a sign of sustainable earning power.
- High dividend growth can significantly boost your total return:
- If a company pays $1 in dividends and increases it by 15% annually over 5 years, you’ll receive $2 per share in year 5 – twice as much as at the start!
📘 Payout Ratio
📈 What is it?
The payout ratio shows what percentage of a company’s earnings (per share) is distributed to shareholders as dividends.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It helps assess whether the dividend is sustainable – especially in relation to the company’s profitability.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low payout ratio means the company retains more earnings for reinvestment – typical for growth companies.
- A moderate payout (e.g. 25–50%) indicates a healthy balance between returns and reinvestment.
- High payout ratios may seem attractive but can carry risk if earnings decline.
📘 Consecutive Dividend Increases
📈 What is it?
This metric shows how many consecutive years a company has raised its dividend per share – without any cuts or pauses.
🧮 How is it calculated?
(Special dividends are not considered.)
🏛️ Why is it important?
A long track record of increases reflects financial strength, consistency, and shareholder commitment.
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A long dividend increase streak builds confidence – especially in volatile markets.
- Such companies are seen as reliable and income-friendly investments.
- The longer the streak, the stronger the company’s dividend discipline.
📘 Revenue
📈 What is it?
Revenue shows how much a company earns in total from selling its products and services – the gross income before any costs are deducted.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Revenue is one of the key figures to assess a company’s size, market position, and growth potential.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Growing revenue indicates rising demand and can be an early signal of future earnings growth.
- Comparing actual and expected revenue reveals trends in the market environment and analyst sentiment.
- Note: Strong revenue alone isn’t enough – margins and profitability matter just as much.
📘 EBITDA
📈 What is it?
EBITDA stands for “Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization.” It reflects a company’s operating profit before the effects of financing, taxes, and accounting depreciation.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
EBITDA is widely used to evaluate a company’s operating performance – especially across capital-intensive sectors or international comparisons.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high or growing EBITDA indicates strong operational profitability – independent of taxes, interest, or accounting methods.
- It’s especially useful for comparing companies across sectors or geographies.
- Important: EBITDA is not a net income figure – it excludes key costs like depreciation and interest.
📘 EBIT
📈 What is it?
EBIT stands for “Earnings Before Interest and Taxes.” It reflects a company’s operating profit after depreciation, but before interest and tax expenses.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
EBIT is a core profitability metric that shows how well the company performs in its main business operations – independent of capital structure and tax environment.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high EBIT indicates strong profitability from the company’s core business – before financial and tax effects.
- It allows better comparison between companies with different debt levels or tax structures.
- Compared to EBITDA, EBIT already accounts for depreciation and reflects capital intensity more clearly.
📘 Net Income
📈 What is it?
Net income is the company’s total profit – the amount left after all expenses, taxes, interest, and depreciation have been deducted.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Net income is the most comprehensive measure of a company’s profitability – showing how much actual profit remains after all business and financing costs.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Growing net income indicates that the company is managing all of its costs efficiently.
- It directly influences valuation metrics like P/E ratio and the company’s dividend capacity.
- Over time, net income trends reveal how resilient and profitable the business model really is.
📘 Free Cash Flow (FCF) | ex SBC
📈 What is it?
Free cash flow shows how much cash remains after a company has covered its operating and capital expenditures. FCF ex SBC additionally deducts stock-based compensation (SBC) to adjust the cash flow for the effect of non-cash SBC.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Free Cash Flow ex SBC = Operating Cash Flow − SBC − Capital Expenditures (CAPEX)
🏛️ Why is it important?
FCF reflects a company’s actual financial strength – independent of reported accounting earnings. It shows how much flexibility a company has for dividends, share buybacks, or debt reduction. FCF ex SBC also deducts stock-based compensation and shows how much cash generation remains after SBC.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- High free cash flow indicates that a company has strong financial strength – independent of reported earnings.
- It is often a solid basis for sustainable dividends and share buybacks.
- Declining FCF can be a warning sign, even if reported earnings remain stable.
📘 Revenue Growth
📈 What is it?
Revenue growth shows how much a company’s sales have changed compared to the previous year – both on a trailing basis (TTM) and based on forward projections.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Forward = (Expected revenue ÷ Revenue in prior year − 1) × 100
Forward growth is based on analyst estimates for the current fiscal year.
🏛️ Why is it important?
Rising revenue signals growing demand, business expansion, and market share gains – especially important for growth-oriented companies.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Growth is the engine of long-term value creation – especially in tech and growth sectors.
- What matters is not just current growth, but its sustainability.
- Forward projections reflect whether analysts expect continued momentum – or a slowdown.
📘 EBITDA Growth
📈 What is it?
EBITDA growth shows how much a company’s operating profit (before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) has increased or decreased compared to the previous year.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Forward = (Expected EBITDA ÷ EBITDA from prior year − 1) × 100
The forward estimate is based on analyst projections for the current fiscal year.
🏛️ Why is it important?
Growing EBITDA indicates improving operational profitability – regardless of financing or accounting effects.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Strong EBITDA growth signals operational efficiency and scalability – especially during growth phases.
- EBITDA growth can be an early indicator of margin and earnings expansion – but should be assessed alongside revenue and EBIT.
📘 EBIT Growth
📈 What is it?
EBIT growth shows how much a company’s operating profit (after depreciation, but before interest and taxes) has increased compared to the previous year.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Forward = (Expected EBIT ÷ EBIT from prior year − 1) × 100
The forward estimate is based on analyst projections for the current fiscal year.
🏛️ Why is it important?
EBIT growth is a direct indicator of a company’s business performance – taking into account capital intensity through depreciation.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Rising EBIT signals improving operating profitability – even after accounting for depreciation.
- It’s especially important for evaluating companies with significant capital expenditures.
- Combined with revenue and EBITDA growth, EBIT growth provides a well-rounded view of operational progress.
📘 Net Income Growth
📈 What is it?
Net income growth shows how much a company’s bottom-line profit has increased or decreased compared to the previous year – both on a trailing basis (TTM) and based on analyst projections.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Forward = (Expected net income ÷ Net income from prior year − 1) × 100
The forward estimate reflects analysts’ expectations for the current fiscal year.
🏛️ Why is it important?
Net income is the ultimate measure of profitability. Growing net income signals stronger efficiency, cost control, and sustainable earnings power.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Stronger net income boosts valuation, dividend potential, and investor confidence.
- If profits stall while revenue grows, it may signal margin pressure.
📘 Free Cash Flow Growth
📈 What is it?
Free cash flow (FCF) growth shows how a company’s available cash – after covering operating expenses and capital expenditures – has changed compared to the previous year.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Free cash flow reflects real financial strength. Growing FCF indicates more flexibility for dividends, share buybacks, and reinvestment.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Declining FCF may point to rising investments, increasing costs, or weaker operating performance.
- Especially for dividend investors, FCF growth is critical – since dividends are paid from actual available cash.
- A negative trend isn't always bad, but it deserves closer attention.
📘 Gross Margin
📈 What is it?
Gross margin shows how much of a company’s revenue remains after deducting the direct costs of goods sold (like materials and production). It represents the company’s “raw profit” before fixed costs, taxes, and interest.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Or simply: Gross Margin = Gross Profit ÷ Revenue × 100
🏛️ Why is it important?
Gross margin indicates how efficiently a company can produce or procure what it sells. It is a key measure of product-level profitability and pricing power.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high gross margin suggests strong pricing power and efficient production.
- Falling margins may signal rising input costs or competitive pressure.
- Compared to peers, gross margin offers insights into the quality of a business model.
📘 EBITDA Margin
📈 What is it?
The EBITDA margin shows how much of a company’s revenue remains as operating profit before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization.It reflects operating efficiency without being distorted by financing or accounting factors.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
The EBITDA margin reveals how much operating income a company generates per dollar of revenue – independent of capital structure and tax effects.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high EBITDA margin reflects strong core profitability – before accounting distortions.
- It allows for effective comparisons across companies and sectors.
- A stable or growing margin signals efficient cost control and business scalability.
📘 EBIT Margin
📈 What is it?
The EBIT margin shows what percentage of revenue remains as operating profit after depreciation but before interest and taxes.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
The EBIT margin reflects a company’s core profitability while accounting for capital intensity (e.g. machinery, infrastructure). It’s especially useful for comparing businesses with different levels of depreciation.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high EBIT margin shows that the company remains efficient even after factoring in depreciation.
- It’s especially relevant for capital-intensive industries.
- Stable or rising EBIT margins over time are a strong indicator of pricing power and business quality.
📘 Net Margin
📈 What is it?
Net margin shows how much of a company’s revenue remains as bottom-line profit after deducting all costs, interest, taxes, and depreciation.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Net margin reflects a company’s overall efficiency – across operations, financing, and taxation. It shows how much actual profit is generated from each dollar of revenue.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high net margin means the company is not only strong operationally but also manages financing and taxes efficiently.
- Peer comparisons reveal business quality and competitiveness.
- Declining margins despite revenue growth can be a red flag for rising costs or inefficiencies.
📘 Free Cash Flow Margin | ex SBC
📈 What is it?
The Free Cash Flow Margin shows how much free cash flow a company generates relative to its revenue. In simplified terms, free cash flow is calculated as operating cash flow minus capital expenditures. The Free Cash Flow Margin ex SBC additionally accounts for stock-based compensation (SBC). While SBC does not represent a direct cash outflow, issuing shares as compensation can dilute existing shareholders. Therefore, SBC is deducted from free cash flow in this adjusted metric.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Free Cash Flow Margin ex SBC = (Free Cash Flow − SBC) ÷ Revenue × 100
🏛️ Why is it important?
The Free Cash Flow Margin shows how efficiently a company converts its revenue into free cash flow. Strong free cash flow can provide financial flexibility for dividends, share buybacks, debt repayment, or further investments. The ex SBC version additionally accounts for the economic impact of stock-based compensation and therefore provides a more conservative view of cash generation from a shareholder perspective.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high Free Cash Flow Margin shows that a company converts a high proportion of its revenue into free cash flow.
- This can provide greater financial flexibility for dividends, share buybacks, debt repayment, or investments.
- The Free Cash Flow Margin ex SBC additionally accounts for potential shareholder dilution from stock-based compensation.
- The long-term trend is particularly important. Declining margins can, for example, result from higher investments, changes in working capital, or weaker operating performance.
📘 Equity Ratio
📈 What is it?
The equity ratio indicates what portion of a company’s total assets is financed by shareholders’ equity – in other words, how much it relies on its own capital.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
A high equity ratio reflects financial strength and stability, especially during downturns. It’s a key indicator of a company’s solvency and long-term risk profile.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Companies with high equity ratios are generally more resilient and less dependent on external debt.
- Low equity ratios can signal higher risk or aggressive financial strategies.
- Important: Always assess the equity ratio in combination with the return on equity (ROE). This shows not just how stable the company is – but also how efficiently it uses shareholder capital.
📘 Return on Equity (ROE)
📈 What is it?
Return on equity (ROE) shows how efficiently a company uses its shareholders’ equity to generate profit. In other words: how much net income is earned per dollar of equity.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
ROE is a core profitability metric. It helps investors understand whether a company delivers attractive returns on the capital provided by its shareholders.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high ROE indicates that the company is using its capital efficiently and profitably.
- It’s especially meaningful for capital-intensive businesses or firms with high equity bases.
- Important: A very high ROE can also result from high debt levels – always interpret it alongside the equity ratio to assess financial health.
📘 Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
📈 What is it?
ROCE measures how efficiently a company generates profits from its total capital – including both equity and interest-bearing debt.
🧮 How is it calculated?
It evaluates the return on all capital employed, regardless of how it’s financed.
🏛️ Why is it important?
ROCE is ideal for comparing companies with different financing structures. It shows how well management uses capital to create value for both shareholders and creditors.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high ROCE means the company uses its capital efficiently – regardless of whether it's funded by debt or equity.
- The higher the ROCE compared to peers, the more value the company creates with its invested capital.
- Especially relevant for capital-intensive sectors like industrials, energy, or infrastructure.
📘 Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
📈 What is it?
ROIC measures how efficiently a company generates returns from the capital invested in its core operations – regardless of whether the capital comes from equity or debt.
🧮 How is it calculated?
- NOPAT = Net Operating Profit After Taxes
- Invested Capital = Operating assets minus non-interest-bearing liabilities
🏛️ Why is it important?
ROIC is one of the most accurate indicators of capital efficiency. Unlike return on equity, it is not distorted by leverage and shows how much value is created for all capital providers.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high ROIC shows how effectively a company uses the capital that is truly invested in its core operations.
- Unlike ROCE, ROIC focuses only on the capital that is actively used to run the business – and that requires a return (i.e. interest-bearing).
- Especially useful when comparing companies with large amounts of excess cash or non-interest-bearing liabilities – giving a more realistic picture of capital efficiency.
📘 Leverage Ratio (Debt-to-Equity)
📈 What is it?
The leverage ratio indicates how much a company relies on interest-bearing debt (such as loans and bonds) relative to its shareholders’ equity.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
This ratio helps assess a company’s financial structure and risk profile. High leverage can enhance returns – but also increases exposure to interest rate changes and financial stress.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low leverage ratio signals financial strength and independence.
- A higher ratio can improve returns in good times but increases risk during downturns or rising interest rate periods.
- 👉 Always interpret in the context of industry, capital intensity, and interest rate environment.
📘 SBC | in % Revenue
📈 What is it?
SBC (Stock-Based Compensation) refers to equity-based compensation granted by a company to its employees and executives. The percentage shows SBC relative to revenue.
🧮 How is it calculated?
SBC as % of Revenue = (SBC ÷ Revenue) × 100
🏛️ Why is it important?
Stock-based compensation is a real cost factor for shareholders. It can increase the number of shares outstanding and therefore dilute existing shareholders. The percentage of revenue shows how heavily a company relies on equity-based compensation and how significant this form of compensation is relative to the size of the business.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A lower figure is generally positive: Stock-based compensation is relatively small compared with the company's revenue.
- A high figure can indicate greater reliance on stock-based compensation and a higher potential risk of dilution. However, it is also important to consider whether the company offsets dilution through share buybacks.
- The trend over time should also be considered. A high but declining percentage presents a different picture from a persistently high or increasing percentage.
- A single-digit SBC-to-revenue ratio is not unusual among many growth-oriented and technology companies.
📘 SBC as % of FCF
📈 What is it?
SBC (Stock-Based Compensation) refers to equity-based compensation granted by a company to its employees and executives. The percentage shows SBC relative to free cash flow (FCF).
🧮 How is it calculated?
SBC as % of FCF = (SBC ÷ Free Cash Flow) × 100
🏛️ Why is it important?
Stock-based compensation is a real cost factor for shareholders. It can increase the number of shares outstanding and therefore dilute existing shareholders. The percentage of free cash flow shows how significant SBC is relative to the cash generated by the company. Since SBC is non-cash compensation, it is typically not deducted as a cash outflow when calculating FCF.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A lower value is generally favorable. Stock-based compensation is relatively small compared with the company's cash generation.
- A high value means that SBC represents a significant portion of the company's reported free cash flow, even though SBC itself is non-cash.
- The higher the value, the more significant SBC can be as an economic cost to shareholders, particularly when it results in share dilution.
📘 SBC Growth 1Y
📈 What is it?
SBC Growth 1Y shows how much a company's stock-based compensation has changed compared to the previous year.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
SBC Growth shows whether stock-based compensation is becoming more or less significant for shareholders. If SBC increases significantly, it can lead to greater shareholder dilution over time. At the same time, SBC is a non-cash expense that reduces earnings on the income statement but is added back in the cash flow statement.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high positive value is generally negative, as rising SBC can increase the burden on shareholders, particularly through potential dilution.
- What matters is whether the development of SBC is sustainable over the long term. Some level of SBC is common among many growth and technology companies.
📘 Share Count Growth 1Y
📈 What is it?
Share Count Growth 1Y shows how much the number of shares outstanding has increased or decreased over a one-year period.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
The number of shares determines how many shares the company's earnings and assets are distributed across. If the share count decreases, existing shareholders' relative ownership increases. If it increases, existing shareholders are diluted. The metric therefore makes dilution and share buybacks directly visible.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A negative value is generally positive, as the number of shares outstanding is decreasing.
- A positive value indicates dilution of existing shareholders.
- A declining share count is not automatically positive: It also matters at what price the shares are repurchased and how the buybacks are financed.
📘 Shareholder Yield
📈 What is it?
Shareholder Yield measures how much capital a company returns to shareholders or uses to reduce debt relative to its market capitalization. It goes beyond dividend yield by also including share buybacks and debt reduction.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Dividend yield only tells part of the story. Companies can also return capital through share buybacks, while reducing debt can strengthen the balance sheet. Shareholder Yield combines all three components into one metric, giving investors a broader view of how a company uses its capital.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A higher Shareholder Yield generally indicates more capital being returned to shareholders or used to reduce debt.
- The mix matters: dividends, buybacks, and debt reduction can affect shareholders in different ways.
- Share buybacks are most beneficial when shares are repurchased at attractive valuations.
- Investors should also consider whether dividends, buybacks, and debt reduction are sustainable over time.
📘 Earnings per share (EPS)
📈 What is it?
Earnings per Share (EPS) shows how much profit is attributable to a single share – and is one of the most important metrics for evaluating a company's performance.
🧮 How is it calculated?
The diluted share count reflects potential new shares that could be issued through options, convertible bonds, or other rights.
🏛️ Why is it important?
EPS is the basis for many key valuation metrics like P/E ratio, PEG ratio, or payout ratio. It enables comparisons of profitability across companies, regardless of their size.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- EPS captures per-share profitability and is especially useful for comparisons over time or with analyst estimates.
- Rising EPS may signal consistent growth or share buybacks.
- Important: Always use diluted EPS for more realistic valuations – especially in companies with stock-based compensation.
📘 Free cash flow per share (FCF per share)
📈 What is it?
Free Cash Flow per Share shows how much free cash flow a company generates per outstanding share – after investments, but before dividends or debt repayments.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Free cash flow is calculated as operating cash flow minus capital expenditures (CapEx).
🏛️ Why is it important?
FCF per Share reveals how much real cash is available per share – useful for dividends, buybacks, or reducing debt. Unlike net income, free cash flow is harder to manipulate and often seen as a more reliable metric.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- High FCF per share signals strong financial flexibility.
- It shows how much capital the company can effectively reinvest or return to shareholders.
- Particularly relevant for dividend payers and capital-efficient businesses.
📘 Short interest
📈 What is it?
Short interest indicates how many shares of a company are currently sold short – that is, borrowed and sold by investors who expect the price to decline.
🧮 How is it calculated?
It reflects the percentage of a company’s shares that are being shorted relative to the total shares available.
🏛️ Why is it important?
Short interest serves as a sentiment indicator: A high value may signal skepticism or bearish expectations – but also increases the potential for a short squeeze if prices rise unexpectedly.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Low short interest usually indicates market confidence in the company.
- High short interest can be a warning sign – or an opportunity if sentiment shifts.
- Especially relevant in volatile markets or ahead of key earnings releases.
📘 Employees
📈 What is it?
The employee count shows how many people a company employs worldwide – offering insights into its size, structure, and business model.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It helps assess operational scale, labor intensity, and cost structure. Combined with revenue and profit, it enables key metrics like revenue per employee or productivity.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high headcount can signal operational complexity – but also significant growth capacity.
- Revenue per employee is a key indicator of efficiency.
- Especially useful for comparing tech, industrial, or service-heavy companies.
📘 Revenue per employee
📈 What is it?
Revenue per employee indicates how much revenue a company generates on average per employee – a key measure of efficiency and productivity.
🧮 How is it calculated?
The employee count is typically taken from the most recent annual report.
🏛️ Why is it important?
This metric helps compare business models – especially between labor-intensive and technology-driven companies. A high value suggests automation, operational efficiency, or strong value creation per head.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high revenue per employee indicates a scalable and margin-strong business model.
- A low figure may reflect labor-intensive operations or lower value-add.
- Especially helpful when comparing tech companies to industrial or service sectors.
Inter Parfums, Inc. Stock Analysis
Analyst Opinions
13 Analysts have issued a Inter Parfums, Inc. forecast:
Analyst Opinions
13 Analysts have issued a Inter Parfums, Inc. forecast:
Inter Parfums, Inc. Events
Past Events
|
AUG
5
Q2 2026 Earnings Call
about 2 months ago
|
|
MAY
6
Q1 2026 Earnings Call
5 months ago
|
|
FEB
25
Q4 2025 Earnings Call
7 months ago
|
|
NOV
6
Q3 2025 Earnings Call
11 months ago
|
StocksGuide Free
Inter Parfums, Inc. — Q2 2026 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Greetings, and welcome to Interparfums 2026 Conference Call and Webcast. [Operator Instructions]
I would now like to turn the conference over to your host, Mr. Devin Sullivan. Thank you. You may begin.
Thank you, Rob, and good morning, everyone. Joining us on the call today will be Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Jean Madar; and Chief Financial Officer, Michel Atwood.
As a reminder, this conference call may contain forward-looking statements, which involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results to be materially different from projected results. These factors may be found in the company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the headings Forward-Looking Statements and Risk Factors. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made, and Interparfums undertakes no obligation to update the information discussed.
Interparfums' consolidated results include 2 business segments, European-based operations through Interparfums SA, the company's 72% owned French subsidiary and United States-based operations.
It is now my pleasure to turn the call over to Jean Madar. Jean, please go ahead.
Thank you, Devin, and good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us on today's call. We are pleased -- very pleased with our performance at the midpoint of the year, which reflects the appeal of our global brand portfolio and the strength of our underlying business and also the disciplined execution and also the continued dedication of our team.
Despite the challenges that persist in our business and industry, these results gives me confidence in our ability to deliver on our full year objectives and continue on the path towards creating long-term value for our shareholders.
So we delivered 2% sales growth in both the second quarter and first half of 2026, supported by strong performance from several of our leading brands and a strong rebound in our United States-based operation of an admittedly weak comparison. Excluding the war-related headwinds in the Middle East, organic sales advanced 4% in the quarter and 1% year-to-date. And we maintained a robust financial position while continuing to invest in product initiatives that position us well for the balance of the year and beyond.
Consolidated sales growth in the first half of the year reflects strong brand execution and solid performance in select regions, partially offset by macro and regional headwinds. North America, our largest market, was up 5%, propelled by a healthy category, a steady cadence of new extensions, most notably from Coach and marketing investments that are clearly paying off.
Asia Pacific was a highlight, up 14% as initiatives supporting Coach and Montblanc took hold. GUESS extended its footprint in Australia and New Zealand and our new Korean affiliate got off to an excellent start after several years of uneven results in the region. We are also encouraged that consumers across Asia Pacific are increasingly embracing the fragrance category, and we are moving quickly to capture that opportunity.
In India, for example, we recently teamed up with a new distributor to bring Coach, Montblanc and Jimmy Choo and several of our other brands back to one of the world's fastest-growing beauty market. Also, South America rose by 15% behind the continued success of Coach for women and Montblanc's Legend line.
Partially offsetting growth from these geographies, a few regions declined in the first half. Western Europe with 3% on softer consumer demand. Eastern Europe was down 7% amid operational difficulties in certain markets, which weighted most heavily on Lanvin and Lacoste. And of course, Middle East and Africa fell 24% as the war in the region continued to weigh on our results. Even with these pressures, our diversified footprint allowed us to grow overall, which speaks to the resilience of our model.
Looking at our brands, momentum in the first half was broad and several of our largest properties finished the second quarter with real strength. Coach grew 10% in the first half, driven by strong performance in the U.S., its primary market, driven by continued demand across most existing lines and by the launch of new extensions in the Coach Women and Coach Men franchises earlier in 2026. Montblanc advanced 6% in the first half of 2026 due to favorable exchange rates and the ongoing success of the Montblanc Explorer Extreme line and the strength of the Legend franchise. With sales holding firm in the second quarter and the first franchise arriving in 2027, we see plenty of runway ahead for this brand.
Next, Jimmy Choo was up 8% for the half year, capped by an impressive 23% jump in the second quarter. The brand's fragrances are winning over more and more customers, particularly in the U.S., thanks to the enduring popularity of I Want Choo and a very successful debut for Jimmy Choo Man platform. GUESS, largest U.S.-based brand rose 11% in the first half, including [indiscernible] in the second quarter. The iconic franchise keeps delivering now bolstered by Iconic Blue for men and the newest Amore extension, Amore Napoli, which was launched in the second quarter. The brand's reach keeps widening as well. Today, for instance, GUESS stands among the top 15 fragrance brand in Australia.
Let's talk about Ferragamo. Ferragamo sales jumped by 41% in the second quarter, bringing first half growth to 17%. Growth was geographically broad with the Signorina? and Ferragamo lines performing very well, elevated by their latest launches introduced in late 2025. We rolled out a commercial innovation program across the brand franchise in May, which further enhanced the brand's growth, including our newest extension, Fiamma Assoluta, which has seen very positive feedback so far.
During the second quarter, Chinese singer and actor, Karry Wang joined the Ferragamo family as the brand's global fragrance ambassador. As mentioned earlier, Asia Pacific is increasingly embracing fragrance. We are hopeful that Karry's affiliation with Ferragamo will further elevate the brand in this burgeoning market.
Donna Karan/DKNY climbed 12% in the first half, punctuated by a 28% increase in the second quarter with healthy demand across categories and franchise and e-commerce becoming an increasing search engine for the brand's growth. The [indiscernible] remains a fixture on TikTok Shop and Amazon. Roberto Cavalli grew 8% in the first half, fueled by this year's introduction across several franchises, among them the unisex scent Marbleous Cypress and several other fragrances launched earlier this year.
Serpentine?continues to be a massive success for the brand globally. The war in the Middle East is certainly impacting this brand, and Cavalli is our largest brand in the region. Notwithstanding the world impact, our conviction and excitement on the trajectory of the brand remains strong.
A few brands faced steeper comparison. Lacoste came in 16% below last year when a string of heat launches lifted first half sales of 44% and conditions in Eastern Europe added pressure. We introduced L.12.12 Bleu for men during the second quarter and with major initiatives lined up for 2027 and 2028, we believe the brand's best performance lies ahead. Recognition keeps coming for our fragrance as well. Bella Blanca from Oscar de la Renta took home the Best Eau de Parfum at The Marie Claire Fragrance Awards 2026 and Ferragamo, Signorina Romantica was honored as the best true?gourmand fragrance at the Who What Wear?Fragrance Awards 2026. Honors like this celebrate the artistry of our team and partners and add to the desirability of our portfolio.
Even as consumers remain increasingly selective about how they allocate their products, in the United States, fragrance was once again the fastest-growing beauty category in the first half, owing to its status as an affordable indulgence and daily form of self-expression. The market has normalized after several years of exceptional growth, but the opportunity remains attractive. For us, is very clear, win share with brands that have personality, quality and global reach. Across our portfolio, we have many ways to speak to consumers and that diversity is one of our greatest strengths.
Beyond the success and innovation from our core brands so far this year, we also made significant strides in developing and expanding our newest portfolio of brands. [indiscernible] rebuilding momentum in high-end fragrance with existing slots having resumed distribution and reopening of Paris boutiques. We are also preparing the launch of new fragrances in 2027.
Lastly, newly created wholly-owned brand Solferino extended to 100 total point of sales at the end of first half this year, and we plan to launch an 11th fragrance to the initial collection in the second half of this year. And we are also preparing for the first launches of new fragrances for Longchamp and Off-White in 2027. Longchamp has the potential to become our next $100 million brand and Off-White represents another step for us into the high-end category.
The layer on top of that, that is the extraordinary rise of digital commerce, which remain a growth driver for us in the second quarter, highlighting Amazon and TikTok Shop. Amazon now sells more beauty online than anyone else in both the U.S. and Europe. While TikTok Shop has become the fourth largest beauty e-commerce platform in the U.S. and is quickly expanding across Europe. We will stay ahead of the curve to identify evolving behaviors, continuously adapt how, where and when we engage. So we meet consumers not just where they are but where they are leading.
Consumers are also making personal layering sense, assembling fragrance, wardrobes and turning to AI-powered recommendations to buy discovery. However, they choose to find us on social media on the major marketplaces or in stores, we are meeting them with storytelling that carries across every channel and delivers an immersive consistent brand experience. Ultimately, this business is about inspiring desire, offering consumers an entry point into the world of an iconic fashion house or celebrity, and we work every day to keep the desire running across each of our brands.
Travel retail remained a steady contributor, once again accounting for roughly 7% of total net sales, in line with prior periods. New York is where the channel is strongest today with conditions softer elsewhere, including, of course, the Middle East, and we see steady growth ahead for this business.
I will briefly touch on tariffs given the newest round implemented under Section 301. As a reminder, our manufacturing is based primarily in Europe and the rates we faced under this latest wave are largely in line with what we were already operating under. So we don't expect to see meaningful changes to our cost structure going forward. That said, we are not standing still. We are increasingly working to position our distributors closer to the point of sale, which shortens supply lines and helps mitigate tariff impacts while keeping our brands close to the consumer.
We are also working on cost saving initiatives to... [Technical Difficulty]
Okay. Please remain on the line. Okay. Our speaker is back with us. You can continue.
I'm so sorry. I don't know you lost me. But anyway, I'm at the end of my comments. So we are saying that while the environment remains anything [indiscernible], we are demonstrating that we can do more than manage through turbulence. We can grow through it. The fragrance category remains resilient. Our brands are performing and we're on track to deliver on our goals this year. We remain cautiously optimistic about the balance of '26, mindful of disruption in the Middle East, but energized by improving trends we see elsewhere and confident in our ability to keep operating efficiently and profitably while driving disciplined, sustainable long-term growth for our customers, brand partners and consumers.
With that, I will now turn it over to Michel for a review of our finance. Michel?
Yes. Thank you, Jean, and good morning, everyone. I will begin by discussing the consolidated results before breaking them down into our 2 operating units, European and United States-based operations. Overall, the diversity of our portfolio continued to support global growth with strength in select brands and geographies, offsetting softness elsewhere and driving our overall results. This year's U.S.-based results benefited from a favorable comparison against last year's second quarter, which was weighed down by weaker innovation and tariff-related supply chain disruptions, whereas our European results are cycling a prior year period of strong growth and therefore, faced a much tougher year-over-year comparison in the current quarter.
Echoing Jean's comments, we maintain a strong financial position, operated with efficiency and continued to invest in our brand portfolio. Net sales grew modestly in 2026 second quarter and first half with reported sales of 2% in each period. These were helped by foreign exchange. Organic growth in 2026 periods was impacted by lingering headwinds associated with the war in the Middle East. Excluding these factors, organic growth improved by 4% in the second quarter and 1% in the first half, respectively.
Our 7 largest brands, which represented 81% of our first half sales grew 6% and our expanding direct-to-retail channel, which represented 42% of first half sales grew 9%. Furthermore, our top 20 brand region combination, which represent 84% of our sales grew a healthy 7%, showcasing the overall strength of our core business.
While the stronger euro has continued to favor our top line, it also increases our cost base across the P&L and our balance sheet. We are continuing to implement a variety of actions to mitigate that impact and have been pleased with the results. While gross margin declined slightly in the 2026 second quarter, first half gross margin expanded by 30 basis points to 65.3% from 65%, and this was primarily driven by a favorable segment, brand and channel mix as well as lower destruction costs, which reflect our continued focus on inventory and supply chain management. These gains were partially offset by tariffs, which represented a net additional expense of $8.2 million in the first half of 2026 compared to last year.
As of June 30, 2026, the company also received $8.7 million in IEEPA tariff refunds, of which $6.9 million was recognized as a nonrecurring reduction in cost of sales in the second quarter. In July 2026, we received the remaining balance of the $17.6 million in IEEPA tariff refunds owned. These funds will benefit quarter 3 and quarter 4 of this year. For the total year, we expect gross margins to improve by roughly 150 basis points with 110 basis points improvements coming from the tariff refunds and the balance coming from favorable brand and channel mix as well as cost efficiency programs.
Higher SG&A expenses for the 2026 period resulted from higher brand marketing investments, royalty costs growing ahead of sales due to unfavorable brand mix as well as higher logistics costs related to supply chain transitions and channel mix. Our A&P spending for the first half of '26 rose to $129 million or 18.8% of sales. This reflects our ongoing commitment to investing in our existing brands and upcoming launches. We are reinvesting the tariff refunds to protect our top line growth and position the company for a successful 2027. As such, we anticipate that on a full year basis, A&P expenditures will approach our long-term target of approximately 21% of net sales.
For the first half of 2026, consolidated operating profit declined to $123 million with an operating margin of 17.9% compared to an operating margin of 20% in the prior year period. Below the operating line, other income and expenses swung to a gain of $0.4 million in the first half from a loss of $6.7 million in the prior year period, a positive impact of $7 million. The improvement was driven by higher interest and investment income, reflecting a stronger ROI on our excess cash and gains on marketable equity securities as well as lower foreign exchange losses.
Our consolidated effective tax rate was for the first half was a stable 24.2% compared to 24.3% in the prior year period. And for the first half, net income held stable at $74 million, or $2.31 per diluted share compared to $2.32 in the prior year period.
Now moving to our 2 business segments. I will start with European-based operations. Net sales declined modestly 4% in the second quarter and 1% in the first half with 5% organic declines in each period, partially offset by favorable foreign exchange. I will again note that our European-based operations completed -- competed against a very high growth comparison in the prior year periods.
Gross margin was at 67.4% in both the second quarter and the first half versus 68.3% and 66.9% in the prior year periods. The quarterly decline was driven by unfavorable brand and channel mix, along with higher tariff costs that were partially offset by onetime tariff refunds. The year-to-date improvement was supported by mix, lower destruction costs and $2.7 million of IEEPA tariff refunds, partially offset by tariffs, which represented an initial expense of $4.5 million.
SG&A increased 8% in the second quarter and first half, rising to $125 million and $229 million or 53.9% of net sales and 47.4% in the second quarter. The driver of the higher marketing is tied to product launches and brand investments. Royalty costs also grew ahead of sales, driven by unfavorable brand mix. Employee-related costs expanded as we continued building up our Korean subsidiary, and we saw higher logistic costs related to increased warehousing fees and supply chain transitions.
Overall, net income attributable to European-based operations declined to $23 million for the quarter, representing 10% of net sales compared to 13.6% in the prior year period. For the first half, net income attributable to European-based operations was $73 million, representing a very healthy 15% of net sales compared to 16.6% in the prior year period.
Now turning to our United States-based operations. Unlike our European-based operations, these results benefited from a favorable comparison base as second quarter 2025 results were negatively impacted by the factors we discussed earlier. With that context, net sales rose 18% in the second quarter, reflecting organic growth of 17% and a 1% positive foreign exchange impact. This performance lifted first half sales growth to 10%, comprising 8% organic growth and 2% foreign exchange tailwind.
Gross margin expanded 90 basis points to 61.6% from 60.7% in the second quarter and 60 basis points to 60.3% from 59.7% for the first half. Tariff refunds representing $4.2 million as well as lower levels of destruction costs helped offset unfavorable channel and product mix and higher ongoing tariff costs.
SG&A grew 9% in the quarter and 6% in the first half, each below our sales growth. As a result, SG&A declined as a percentage of net sales to 44.2% and 46%, respectively, compared to 48% and 47.8% in the prior year periods, reflecting productivity gains from accelerated sales growth and partially offset by unfavorable brand mix on royalties. Overall, net income attributable to U.S.-based operations grew to $15 million for the quarter representing 13.7% of net sales compared to 10% in the prior year period and to $24 million in the first half, representing 11.4% of net sales compared to 9.6% last year.
Moving to cash. At June 30, our balance sheet remains strong with $211 million in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments and working capital of $664 million. From a cash flow perspective, accounts receivable declined 3% from year-end 2025 and days sales outstanding decreased slightly to 73 days from 74 days in the prior year period. These were driven by changes in our channel mix. We continue to see strong collecting activity and do not anticipate any issues with collections of account receivable.
Despite foreign exchange headwinds on our costs, inventories declined 12% to $376 million compared to the prior year period, representing a 34-day reduction in inventory days on hand to 269 days as we continue to drive inventory efficiencies and work to increase the conversion of raw materials into finished goods. By effectively managing working capital relative to our sales growth, we again significantly improved our operating cash flow. Cash flow generated from operating activities reached $46 million in the first half or 49% of net income, up from $5 million or 5% of net income in the prior year period. Obviously, operating cash flow also benefited from the receipt of the $8.7 million in IEEPA tariff refunds, but we continue to expect strong free cash flow productivity in 2026 and beyond.
Now, as noted in our Form 10-Q, our Board has authorized a share repurchase program as an additional capital allocation tool. This gives us flexibility to evaluate potential repurchases of shares of Interparfums, Inc. or shares of Interparfums SA or both, depending on market conditions, liquidity, relative valuation and other business priorities. The Board has also authorized the company to enter into a line of credit of up to $250 million to support the program, enhancing our financial flexibility and optionality without obligating us to draw the full amount or complete any specific level of repurchase. We intend to approach the program in a measured and disciplined way while continuing to prioritize the needs of the business, strategic investment opportunities and long-term value creation for our shareholders.
Now turning to our 2026 guidance and outlook. As outlined in our earnings release issued last evening, we are maintaining our full year outlook. We continue to expect sales of approximately $1.48 billion and diluted earnings per share of $4.85. Our EPS guidance includes the expected benefits of the $17.6 million of tariff refunds we have received this year, which is enabling us to reinvest in A&P and offset higher-than-expected tariff and logistic costs. With refunds received, we will reinvest in our brands to drive growth. We continue to anticipate a return to improved growth in 2027, driven by enhanced innovation, including a series of blockbuster launches planned for '27 and '28 as well as the development and distribution of our newest brands that Jean talked about.
Overall, we remain mindful of external pressures, including the war in the Middle East, moderating demand in several international markets, overall economic concerns and pressures that may arise from recently enacted tariffs on our cost structures, but we are continuing to closely monitor potential inflationary impacts as suppliers adjust pricing. Nevertheless, we remain well positioned with a strong innovation pipeline, enduring global partnerships and a resilient consumer base that collectively reinforce our confidence in our long-term growth and value creation.
With that, Rob, please open the line for questions.
[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Sydney Wagner with Jefferies.
2. Question Answer
So first one, maybe just to ask about the consumer. You mentioned some consumer selectivity. Can you just talk about how that's manifesting itself in fragrance? I understand that the category overall has been strong, but maybe are you seeing fewer add-ons, buying smaller sizes? Or has this driven kind of a shift toward promotional occasions? I guess within that, maybe also just comment on the promotional environment.
And then on China, we've heard some reports of international players now doing better in China versus domestic brands. Are you seeing any change in consumer demand or sell-through trends there that have improved versus maybe what you've seen 6 to 12 months ago?
Michel, do you want to start?
Yes. Sure, Sydney. Look, overall, we continue to see healthy demand. We're not seeing any significant increases in promotionality. I mean, there was certainly over the holiday season last year, there was a little bit more gift sets than we typically see in the holiday period. But overall, I would say it's been -- it's quite normalized and a lot of the price increases that have been taken have kind of stuck. I know that there have been some conversations around the entry price points and smaller sizes. We're not really seeing anything in that space. It's pretty much normalizing.
In terms of China, the market is actually doing quite well, and we're seeing some significant growth there. But again, the China fragrance market is generally quite small for us, but it's been growing and it's been actually quite healthy. Jean?
Yes. There is no particular increase of small size, and we do not see any more -- no particular promotional activity. So we will not have anything special to report on that. Regarding China, what we can see is that when we are able to find and sign celebrity ambassadors that have hundred millions of followers, of course, this accelerate the sale. And that's what we are doing for Ferragamo, for Coach. And going forward, we will definitely continue to hire this very, very big celebrity to be the ambassadors and to talk about the brand, which is what in China.
Our next question comes from Susan Anderson with Canaccord Genuity.
I was wondering if maybe you could just expand on some of the blockbuster launches you see coming next year. Maybe if there's any color you can provide on timing of them flowing through in 2027? And then also, I guess, the same with the new licenses, Longchamp and Off-White, how are you thinking about those flowing through for the year? And then just in terms of the investment around those new launches and licenses, how should we think about that flowing through the income statement?
I can try to answer the first part of the question. I will let Michel talk about the investment. '27 is going to be impressive because all our big brands, all our big brands, the ones that are doing [ $100 million ] and above will have a blockbuster. So for the people who are not familiar, blockbuster means whole new launch, whole new pillar, so Montblanc, Coach, GUESS, Jimmy Choo, all will have blockbuster. It's quite unusual for us, usually, it doesn't happen all in the same year. So the cadence will be across all the quarters. We are not going to launch all January 1. It will be cadence during the year. It's difficult to give you what is the impact really when we have blockbuster in one of our brands, it has a halo effect on the whole brand. So that's why we can expect when we have blockbuster to have growth of high single digits, sometimes low double digit. So it will be very exciting, and it will continue into 2028 also.
Michel, do you want to talk about investments? Or maybe investment. Longchamp, Off-White. Longchamp is very exciting. Finds a beautiful brand known for their bags. We had great success with Coach. So we think that Longchamp will be also very successful. We showed the products to all our distributors, retailers, and the response is very positive. So that's why I said in my remarks that Longchamp has the potential to become quickly a $100 million brand. Off-White is going to be also interesting because this is not a license. This is a trademark that we bought 1.5 years ago, and we will be launching men's and women's fragrance in the end of first quarter next year. Michel, if you want to talk about investments?
Yes, sure. Thanks, Jean. So investment side, obviously, when you have significant launches, you will have to invest more. But our thinking is that we'll be able to kind of cover this within the rest of the P&L. We should get -- if we get significant sales acceleration, we should see some scale benefits on the rest of the P&L. So really, our goal is to fund this within the P&L. But again, until we actually put together the plan, the sequencing, we won't have any clear visibility to that. Again, #1 priority for us remains profitable top line growth, and that's really where we're going to continue to head over the next couple of years.
Our next question comes from Jonna Kim with TD Cowen.
The first one is, how are you measuring your efficiency of marketing spend as you continue to invest in that? Any key channels and priorities that you could talk about would be helpful.
And then second question, what would take you to raise guide at this point? What are key factors you're currently monitoring for the guide?
Michel?
Yes, sure. I mean we measure the ROI of our spending. I mean most of our spending today is really done on digital and as well as on social media, and using influencers. And so we have tools to kind of measure what is working, what's not working. And generally, that's where we're flowing most of our dollars. We're also flowing a lot of our dollars really towards the fast-growing channels, which as Jean pointed out, Amazon, TikTok, online. So really, those are the areas.
In terms of increasing our guidance, obviously, I think there are a number of things in the second half that we're kind of waiting to see what happens. As you could probably have seen, I mean, we have done a little bit better on the top line than we were originally planning. We have been helped by FX. We're starting to see FX move in the opposite direction. There's also the considerations in the Middle East and Eastern Europe, which have kind of been weighing down on our growth. So I think if things improve there, that may help us. But again, it's going to depend on when that happens during the year. I would say that, that's the main element. And then on the rest of the P&L, I think it's going to probably be very similar to what we saw kind of last year with the exception of A&P, which we're expecting to continue to fuel more investments in A&P to shore up the growth.
Jean, I don't know if you have any questions on that. Any other comments on that, Jean?
No, no. I think you covered. I totally agree. Our guidance is always a difficult to exercise because there are so many parameters that we have to take into account. But right now, we are comfortable with the actual guidance. Next question?
Our next question comes from Aron Adamski with Goldman Sachs.
I have 3. Firstly, on inventory levels. As we enter the peak fragrance trading period, how would you assess retailer and distributor inventories at this stage across the U.S. and Europe? Are there any pockets of elevated stocks that could lead to destocking?
Second, just to actually follow-up on the 2027 launch cycle. I believe the juices for these products are now ready. So I was wondering how complementary from an Olfactory standpoint, do you expect these new products to be? Or would you expect to see some cannibalization within the portfolio as you launch these?
And then lastly, on the outlook for the remainder of the year, how should we think about the growth cadence between Q3 and Q4? Are there any specific phasing factors to consider? And similarly, on profitability, how do you expect gross margin and operating margin progression to develop across the 2 remaining quarters? And if there are any phasing factors to consider?
Thank you, Aron. I'll let you start and I will comment. I didn't really understand, Aron, your second question about the 2027 launches.
Yes. So just to clarify, the [ scent ] profile, I guess, of these new products, do you expect them to be complementary to your current offering? Or is there some risk of cannibalization?
Okay. Okay, of course. Okay. All right. Let's start. Michel, do you want to start with inventory, please?
Yes. Let me start with inventory. So overall, we're finding that the destocking is really kind of starting to normalize. And we're not really seeing any significant areas where there's very high inventory levels or very low inventory levels. But I would say, overall, we're feeling pretty comfortable. Even though I'd say structurally, inventory will probably continue to go down for the reasons we have explained in the past, which is as people become more and more efficient, as more and people buy online, there's naturally going to be less inventory in the system. But overall, we're not really seeing some of the concerns that we had, I would say, over the last 12 months, it seems to be normalizing. Jean, I don't know if you want to add anything on the inventory piece.
Yes. This is, of course, something that we look at very carefully, and we monitor inventory at the level of our distributors and when we have information at the level of our retailers. And I will say that inventory at both levels are quite low in the sense that they are well managed by our distributors and by the retailers. They are ordering on a weekly or every other week basis. So I don't see any heavy inventory in stores, maybe a little light for certain people like Amazon and TikTok, but their business is growing at a fast pace, and sometimes we have difficulty to anticipate their need, which is a good problem to have, but we need to be vigilant to make sure that we don't miss any business there. I don't see too much -- I don't see destocking like you said, Michel.
Okay. Maybe I'll touch on the outlook for the rest of the year, and then we can go back to the second question on the launch cycle. So as you know, Aron, we don't really like to guide by quarter. It's difficult enough to guide for the year in the current environment. What I can say is that if you look at our guidance, the implied -- it implies a 3% decline in the second half versus last year. There's going to be about 1 point of that that's going to come from FX. As you know, we had a higher FX has helped us in the first half, but we expect it to hurt us. Again, there's a big question mark around that.
And then if you look at the third quarter versus the fourth quarter, last year, fourth quarter was stronger. So I kind of would expect that as you balance that off between the third and the fourth quarter, it look a little bit better in the third and a little bit worse in the fourth. I don't know if that helps on the top line.
On the on the SG&A side -- or sorry, on the cost of goods side, frankly, it's really going to depend on how we account for these tariff refunds that's going to be -- that's going to drive the impact. As you know, the tariff refunds are based on not when the money comes in, but when we think it actually hits our P&L. So there could be some significant helps in the third quarter coming from that, but we haven't really modeled that out yet. That's something that we'll be working on over the next couple of weeks.
And then on the SG&A side, I would say most of the A&P increase that you're seeing in the second half is going to be mostly on the third quarter. We generally always have a very, very strong fourth quarter. And so you'll see those investments primarily more in the third quarter to strengthen the third quarter in preparation of the key consumption period in the fourth quarter. So I don't know if that -- Jean, if you had anything you wanted to add on that, please?
No, no, that's your part. Okay. So the scent profile, this is a very interesting question. So we're going to launch, as we said, a lot of new blockbuster next year. And of course, when we started to think about what we are going to launch, and this takes 18 to 24 months, we do a mapping of [indiscernible] is mapping to make sure that what we are going to launch doesn't cannibalize or doesn't go into the territory of the other franchise. So basically with new blockbuster, we're going to try to get new customers, maybe a different age, maybe a different taste, maybe a different geography. So this question is very interesting because we look for each brand at the spot that we are reaching, and we -- that's what we want to accomplish. So of course, a cannibalization could happen, but we're looking at additional events.
Yes. Maybe just to build on Jean, I mean, when we design a blockbuster, the key is really to identify an unmet need from a consumer standpoint. What is the -- we look at the existing consumers and we look at why certain consumers are not buying. And if those consumers are not buying the list but are interested in the brand, we try to develop a consumer proposition that is going to cover some of those unmet needs. And so it's not always about necessarily of active profile, but it also has to deal with also the consumer proposition and the packaging and the concepts and a lot of areas like that. This is one of the reasons why it's so critical that it takes time to do this properly.
The other area also that comes into effect on cannibalization is the level of incremental investments. So if you rob Peter to pay Paul, you definitely won't get -- you may get the uplift, but you'll see more cannibalization. And again, coming back to the question we got around investment profile, those are some of the areas that we have to look into as we start working through our 2027 plan, how aggressively do we want to invest relative to the potential risk of cannibalization. And again, there, the idea is to privilege profitable top line growth.
Our next question comes from Fraser Donlon with Berenberg.
Jean and Michel, it's Fraser here from Berenberg. I have 2. So the first was just to ask about some of the kind of smaller retail brands in the portfolio because I think you have maybe 3 with -- which are expiring in 2026 or with extension options, which may not be taken up. I don't know. So like how are you thinking about that internally? And I guess the add-on to that would be, is there still an appetite to add potentially larger brands, either within the EU ops or the U.S. ops?
And then the second question was just on your inventory into year-end. How should we think about that given you do have this really kind of strong pipeline building for 2027 when it comes to your own inventory?
Michel, do you want to start talking about the small brands?
Yes. I mean, obviously, when we look at our portfolio, as you know, we have added a lot of larger brands, and we've also have a pipeline of brands that are coming with both Nautica and David Beckham. Ultimately, while our business model enables us to manage all types of brands quite efficiently in terms of capacity utilization and allocation of resources, we always look at these smaller brands towards their end of their life cycle, and then we'll make decisions in conjunction with the existing license partners.
Again, we can't typically comment on those things until we're advanced. But I would say, generally, the smaller brands in the portfolio and when they get -- when they come to the end of their useful life, and don't necessarily make sense in our portfolio anymore, those are things that we are considering. And we have talked about building 1 to 2 points of headwinds to account for those things. Jean, I don't know if you want to comment on the smaller brand.
Yes, agree. But no, I would like to comment on new license and new brands. We are still actively looking for more license. As Michel mentioned, we're going to have David Beckham brand and Nautica joining the portfolio when the actual license. And we still have time for that. But we are actively talking to other brands, either some that have fragrance license already and some that do not have yet fragrance license. And we feel that with the organization that we have, with the diverse portfolio that we have, we can still accommodate new brands either in Paris or in New York.
Yes. And then on the inventory, of course, inventory buildup will be dependent on actually when we phase and when we launch. But overall, I think we're feeling pretty good about the progress that we've been making on inventory, and we feel confident that we should see a much better position at the end of this year than what we had last year. Again, hard to really say until we actually have a clear read on our inventory buildup. But not all of our launches are going to happen on January 1 next year. Some of them are going to happen in the back half of the year. So yes, we should see some of these improvements that we've seen now across the various quarters continuing into year-end.
We have reached the end of the question-and-answer session. I'd now like to turn the call back over to Michel Atwood for closing comments.
All right. Thank you, Rob. Thank you all for joining us today. Jean and I really want to recognize our teams, our partners, our brands and all of our stakeholders whose dedication, trust and agility continue to drive efficiency and support our success as we navigate our uncertain environment together.
I would also like to mention that I'll be participating in the Canaccord Annual Growth Conference in Boston on August 11 and 12, so next week. So if you'd like to participate, please reach out to your sales representative at Canaccord for information. And if you have any additional questions, please contact Devin Sullivan or Conor Rodriguez from The Equity Group, our Investor Relations representatives. And thank you, and have a great day.
This concludes today's conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time, and we thank you for your participation.
Inter Parfums, Inc. — Q1 2026 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Greetings, and welcome to Interparfums Inc. First Quarter 2026 Conference Call and Webcast. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded.
I would now like to turn the conference over to your host, Mr. Devin Sullivan, Managing Director at the Equity Group and Interparfums Investor Relations representative. Thank you. You may begin.
Thank you, Rob. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us today. Joining us on the call today will be Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Jean Madar; and Chief Financial Officer, Michel Atwood.
As a reminder, this conference call may contain forward-looking statements, which involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results to be materially different from projected results. These results -- these factors may be found in the company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the headings Forward-Looking Statements and Risk Factors. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made, and Interparfums undertakes no obligation to update the information discussed. Interparfums' consolidated results include two business segments: European-based operations through Interparfums SA, the company's 72% owned French subsidiary; and United States-based operations.
It is now my pleasure to turn the call over to Jean Madar. Jean, please go ahead.
Thank you, Devin, and good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us on today's call. We started off the year broadly in line with expectations with consolidated sales increasing 2% on a reported basis, reflecting growth from both our U.S. and European-based operations despite mixed results across the portfolio, aided by favorable foreign exchange movements. We were able to generate significant growth across several key markets, operating in a more difficult environment, while enhancing profitability. Our results reflect the strength of our underlying business, the appeal of our brands and the disciplined execution of our strategy across a diverse global footprint.
Consolidated sales growth in the first quarter reflected strong brand execution and solid performance in select regions, partially offset by macro and regional headwinds. North America, our largest market, increased by 7%, driven by continued category growth and innovative brand extensions, particularly from Coach. Central and South America grew 23%, supported by strong momentum in women's and men's Coach franchises and the Montblanc Legend line. Western Europe sales were flat, driven by slow consumer demand.
These results, however, were partially offset by softer performance in other parts of the world. Eastern Europe declined 12%, driven by operational difficulties in certain markets, which disproportionately impacted Lanvin and Lacoste. Middle East and Africa declined 12%, primarily due to recent intensifications of regional wars and the conflicts in the region. Asia Pacific sales decreased 7%, driven by distribution changes we implemented in 2025 in South Korea and India and softer consumer demand in Australia and New Zealand, which were partially compensated by strong growth in China.
Moving to performance by brand, we saw solid growth from several of our larger brands. Coach increased 30%, reflected strong sell-in following the launches of new extensions with Coach women and Coach men franchises, Coach Cherry and Coach Platinum as well as sustained healthy demand across most existing lines.
Montblanc rose 14%, driven by the launch of Legend Elixir, the first launch for the Legend franchise since 2024 and the success of the Explorer Extreme line launched last year and a lower sales base in last year's first quarter. GUESS, our largest U.S. brand -- U.S.-based brand, grew 11% in the first quarter, driven by ongoing success of the Iconic franchise, supported by launches of new extensions within the Iconic and Seductive pillars.
Roberto Cavalli continued to generate robust results to start 2026, achieving a 32% increase in net sales. Our blockbuster launch from last year, Serpentine, remains substantial success, opening a lot more doors for us across the world. The product was a finalist for the Prestige & Popular Packaging of the Year award at the Fragrance Foundation last month. And growth during the quarter was also fueled by the latest innovation, Just Cavalli Wild Heart extension dual gender duo, Wild Pink and Wild Blue and Verde Assoluto, the newest fragrance within the Uomo pillar.
Other key brands reflected tougher comparisons. Lacoste declined 12%, driven by last year's strong innovation-led growth and weaker Eastern Europe conditions. We launched a new extension late in the first quarter called Original Aqua for men, and we plan to launch several other extensions throughout the year to further elevate the brand.
While Donna Karan/DKNY declined 3% off a high prior-year base, we did see a 16% rebound in Be Delicious Core, indicating renewed consumer demand and improving franchise momentum. The Cashmere Mist deodorant also remains an extremely successful product within the Donna Karan/DKNY brand as it continues to be incredibly popular on TikTok Shop and Amazon.
Overall, with a global fragrance market normalizing towards historical growth rates following several years of exceptional performance, capturing market share has taken on greater importance as a key source of momentum. In order for us to do that, our portfolio offerings must both be diverse and distinguished to reach and appeal to multiple large consumer audiences, especially in a more difficult operating environment.
In addition to launching new exciting innovation across our existing portfolio, we are expanding our portfolio with new brands to further amplify our offerings and appeal. During the first quarter, we resumed distribution of the existing lines of Annick Goutal and reopened 2 store locations in Paris with another one to open soon. We will continue to develop the brand's reach and offering within the high-end fragrance market. Also, we are continuing to develop brand-new fragrances for Longchamp and Off-White and these launches will happen in 2027. We expect these two new brands to help us elevate our positioning in the high-end fragrance category.
And in January, we announced a separate exclusive long-term worldwide fragrance license agreements with David Beckham and Nautica. When these brands join our portfolio, Beckham in '28 and Nautica in 2030, respectively, both will be essential for us to expand our offerings in the lifestyle, fragrance space that we know quite well.
Fragrance continues to stand apart within the beauty for its resilience, supported by its role as an accessible luxury and everyday form of self-expression that consumers continue to prioritize even amid macroeconomic and geopolitical uncertainty and more deliberate spending behavior. The category is also benefiting from powerful e-commerce tailwinds with an increasing number of fragrance products purchased through nontraditional retailers, including Amazon, underscoring the growing importance of digital marketplaces in both discovery and conversion.
Consumers are also increasingly seeking personalization, which they find through fragrance layering as well as personalized AI-driven recommendations. Whether through social media, major e-commerce platforms or physical retail, the way consumers discover, evaluate and engage with fragrance is rapidly evolving. These are powerful channels for discovery, and we are actively leaning into that shift with a focus on storytelling that can bridge multiple channels and offer consumers immersive and consistent brand experience.
To be successful, brands must inspire desire, whether as a gateway into the world of an iconic fashion house such as Jimmy Choo, Ferragamo or Coach, or that of a celebrity like the one we will do with Beckham. We are continuing to develop our portfolio to maintain desirability across all our brands.
The travel retail market continued to perform well, representing approximately 7% of total net sales, consistent with prior periods. Brands including Roberto Cavalli, GUESS and Coach have performed well to start the year with travel retail overall currently showing strength in Europe, in particular. We anticipate steady growth in our travel retail business going forward.
Despite a dynamic macroeconomic environment, the global fragrance category remains resilient, and we will -- and we are well positioned to deliver on our goals this year. We remain cautiously optimistic for the balance of 2026, reflecting war and disruption in the Middle East, while capturing improving dynamics in other regions. We are confident in our ability to navigate near-term volatility, continue to operate efficiently and profitably and drive disciplined, sustainable long-term growth in service of our customers, brand partners and consumers.
With respect to the Middle East, I realize that oftentimes we can fall into the trap of viewing different parts of the world primarily through the lens of how it impacts our business. But our concern for our colleagues and partners in the whole Middle East extends directly to them, their families and communities. We truly appreciate and acknowledge their contribution during this time of heightened conflict and of course, we pray for better days ahead.
Before I close, I want to highlight that alongside operating our business, strengthening our ESG profile remains a key priority. Our ESG strategy is now in its first year and is going strong. We have seen a great return on our investment in this program across supply chain visibility, our ability to respond to new regulatory requirements and our external investor ratings. These actions and enhanced measures resulted in Interparfums receiving its third consecutive ESG rating increase from MSCI. We now sit at BBB and have our sights set on A. Our goal is to continue addressing the environmental and social risks that are most financially material to our business. This approach pairs long-term return on investment, focused resiliency with ESG performance.
With that, I will now turn it over to Michel for a review of our financial results. Michel?
Thank you, Jean, and good morning, everyone. I will begin by discussing the consolidated results before breaking them down into our two operating segments, European and United States-based operations.
As Jean pointed out, we delivered sales of $345 million, representing a 2% increase on a reported basis. On an organic basis, which excludes the impact of foreign exchange and the headwinds generated by the Middle East conflicts, sales declined 3%. Excluding the 1% headwind related to the war in the Middle East, organic sales declined by a more moderate 2%.
Foundations of our business remain strong and continue to go from strength to strength. For instance, our top 20 brand-region combinations, which represents 86% of our global sales in Q1, grew 9%. Our direct-to-retail channel, which represents 43% of our sales in Q1, grew 16%. This significant growth has had a sizable positive impact on our P&L as the direct retail channel has significantly higher gross margins but also requires more SG&A, especially A&P and logistics.
Our reported growth benefited from a favorable 4.6% foreign exchange tailwind. While the stronger euro has continued to favor our top line, it also increases our cost base across the P&L and our balance sheet. We are continuing to implement a variety of actions to mitigate that impact and have been pleased with the results.
Delving into gross margins, they expanded by 140 basis points to 65.1% from 63.7% of sales. And this is primarily driven by favorable segments, brand, channel mix as described above as well as lower-than-expected destruction costs, which reflect enhanced efficiencies in areas such as inventory management and forecasting.
These gains were partially offset by tariffs, which represented an expense of about $6 million during the first quarter of 2026. We are pleased with the positive effect of our tariff mitigation activities and ongoing cost savings initiatives. Our manufacturing optimization whereby we are shifting manufacturing closer to the point of sale, continues to contribute favorably to our operations and our cost structure. In combination with select pricing actions we took last year, we expect gross margin stability in 2026.
SG&A expenses as a percentage of net sales rose 200 basis points to 43.6% compared to the prior year period of 41.6% of sales. The increase resulted from a number of factors, royalty costs grew ahead of sales due to the GUESS license extension and unfavorable brand mix. We also had FX impacts, as described above, and higher logistics costs related to supply chain transitions and channel mix. Our A&P spending was stable at $52 million, approximately 15% of sales, and we continue to invest in line with anticipated sell-out by retailers to help drive traffic across all distribution channels, which we believe are higher than our reported sales.
Overall, our consolidated operating income was $74 million for the quarter, a 1% decline from the prior-year period, resulting in an operating margin of 21.5% or a 70 basis point decrease from the very, very high 22.2% in the first quarter of '25. Below the operating line, we reported a gain of $1.1 million in other income and expense compared to a loss of $1.7 million, leading to a positive year-over-year impact of $2.7 million compared to the 2025 first quarter. There was within these numbers, a $1 million increase in interest income behind the stronger ROI on our excess cash.
Moving to tax. Our consolidated effective tax rate was stable at 24.6% compared to 24.5% in the prior-year period. These factors led to a net income of $43 million or $1.35 per diluted share, representing an increase of 2% compared to net income of $42 million and $1.32 per diluted share in the prior-year period. As a percentage of net sales, net income rose to 12.6%, broadly in line with the prior-year period.
Now moving to our two business segments. I will start with European-based operations. For our European-based operations, net sales rose 2% but declined by 4% on an organic basis. Gross margin expanded by 190 basis points to 67.4% from 65.5% and this was driven by favorable brand and channel mix as well as lower-than-expected destruction costs and some of the pricing that we took last year. These were partially offset by tariffs, which represented an expense of $4 million.
SG&A increased by 9% to $104 million, with SG&A as a percentage of net sales rising 270 basis points to 41.4% of sales compared to prior-year period. The increase in SG&A was driven by foreign exchange impacts, along with increases in employee-related costs as we are building up our Korean subsidiary and higher logistics costs related to increased warehouse fees. Royalty costs also grew ahead of sales, driven by unfavorable brand mix.
Overall, net income attributable to European operations grew 4% to $50 million for the quarter, representing 19.8% of sales compared to 19.4% in the prior-year period.
Now turning to United States-based operations. Net sales rose 2%, helped by a positive foreign exchange tailwind, organic sales were broadly flat. Gross margin remained essentially flat at 58.9% compared to 58.7% with favorable brand and channel mix as well as lower-than-expected destruction costs offsetting the tariffs, which represented an expense of about $2 million.
Now while SG&A expense increased 3%, SG&A as a percentage of net sales remained essentially flat at 47.9% compared to 47.6% in the prior-year period. Overall, net income attributable to the U.S.-based operations was broadly flat at $8 million for the quarter, representing 9% of sales. This also reflected a higher effective tax rate of 19.7% in the first quarter of '26 compared to 18.1% in the prior period, which was driven by a lower tax gain from stock-based compensation.
March 31, our balance sheet remains strong with $237 million in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments as well as working capital of close to $700 million. From a cash flow perspective, accounts receivable was up 6% and days sales outstanding was at 78 days, up from 74 days in the prior-year period, driven by foreign exchange and changes in channel mix. Despite the increase, we are still seeing strong collection activity, and we do not anticipate any issues with collections or accounts receivable.
Even amid foreign exchange headwinds on our costs, inventories declined significantly to $370 million as of March 31, 2026, from $396 million a year ago. This represented a 17-day reduction in inventory on hand to 259 days. By effectively managing working capital relative to our sales growth, we again significantly improved our operating cash flow. Cash flow generated from operating activities was positive during the quarter compared to operating cash usage of $7 million during the 2025 first quarter. We continue to expect strong free cash flow productivity in 2026.
Now turning to our guidance and outlook. As outlined in our earnings release issued last evening, we are maintaining our full year outlook. We continue to expect sales of approximately $1.48 billion and diluted earnings per share of $4.85. Our EPS guidance does not include any benefit from potential tariff refunds. While we remain proactive in mitigating the impacts of tariffs on our cost structure, we're also monitoring the possibility of IEEPA tariffs refunds this year, which could total approximately $17 million.
These potential tariff refunds are not included in our outlook for 2026. However, should they occur, we would likely take the opportunity to reinvest, at least partially, in support of our brands and fuel momentum where we think we can get a strong long-term ROI.
We continue to anticipate a return to stronger growth in 2027, driven by enhanced innovation, including the development and distribution of our newest brands. Overall, we are seeing moderating demand in several international markets, along with tariff-related pressures on our cost structures, and we are continuing to closely monitor potential inflationary impacts as suppliers adjust pricing. Nevertheless, we remain well positioned with a strong innovation pipeline, enduring global partnerships and a resilient consumer base that collectively reinforce our confidence in our long-term growth and value creation.
With that, operator, please open the line for questions.
[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Sydney Wagner with Jefferies.
2. Question Answer
So gross margin obviously expanded during the quarter, which was great. So just curious, looking ahead, which of those benefits do you view as structural versus more quarter-specific?
And then on the category, you've obviously spoken to seeing some normalization. But you've also noted pockets of strength where we're seeing maybe above-category growth. So how do you feel about the portfolio's ability to capture those pockets of above-fragrance algo growth?
All right. Thanks. So maybe, look, gross margin was really a combination of everything going favorably for us this quarter. We had the impact of the pricing increases that we took last year. We had a significantly favorable mix impact coming from our direct-to-retail channel. As you know, the gross margin on our direct-to-retail are significantly higher than when we sell through distributors. It was really a perfect storm.
At this point in time, we expect this to kind of normalize over the balance of the year, and this is one of the reasons why we're maintaining our gross margin target flat for the year. I would expect to see some of this mitigating particularly over the course of the second and third quarter.
Regarding the portfolio. Yes, go ahead, Jean, do you want to touch on the portfolio piece?
Yes. Regarding the portfolio, I would like to say that our bigger brands are doing better than our smaller brands. So when you look at Coach, Jimmy Choo, GUESS, Montblanc, DKNY, they are all in good shape and they will grow this year. We definitely -- we will look at the smaller brands. And in time, we will definitely [ edit ] the portfolio. Maybe brands that are doing less than $10 million should not be part of the portfolio. But -- and that's why we are looking at always increasing the portfolio of brands, looking for bigger brands, bigger potential, and we are happy to have signed in the first quarter of this year, two new license, one with Beckham, one with Nautica, even though they will start later on, they will be a great addition to the portfolio.
Regarding geography, we think that there is a good potential in the U.S. We see some strength in the U.S., primarily department stores, Amazon U.S., TikTok U.S., we think will perform better than other parts of the world.
Yes. Maybe just to build on Jean, we did see very, very strong growth in the market in the U.S. The market was up 7% in the quarter. And actually, it was very, very strong in March. It was up close to 9%. So that is -- that's really driving and fueling the momentum. Reiterating our core portfolio, our core portfolio, our top 7 brands grew actually 8% this quarter. So we have a very, very strong portfolio, and I think we have a very, very long tail that we need to continue to streamline over time. But overall, I would say, a very healthy core.
And then in terms of emerging consumer segments, we are playing in some of these smaller sized, trial size, probably lower price points when you think about TikTok. And we're also, as you know, with Goutal, as well as with Solferino, we're starting to play in the space where -- the higher luxury space, which we know has also historically been one of the faster-growing segments in this space.
If I can just poke in one quick follow-up. So on that 9% growth you saw in March, are you still seeing that level of growth quarter-to-date? Or how did the trends in April compare?
I haven't seen the April numbers yet. I think we'll be getting them most probably in the next couple of days. But yes, I mean, we're not hearing or seeing anything that seems to be limiting the growth. I mean, I think still growth in the U.S. continues to be very healthy.
Our next question comes from Susan Anderson with Canaccord Genuity.
I guess maybe just a follow-up on -- so it sounds like you guys feel really good about the U.S. growth, I guess, continuing maybe even into the back half. I guess, how are you guys feeling about Europe and just globally in kind of a little bit more of a normalized fragrance growth environment?
And then also just in terms of your newness, no big launches this year, but I guess, are you expecting more kind of newness to roll out in the back half versus the first half to kind of maintain that share until we get to kind of some more blockbuster launches next year and some new licenses?
Michel, do you want to answer on Europe?
Yes, sure. I mean, look, as much as the U.S. continues to do well. I think Europe is more of a mixed bag. You saw our numbers for Eastern Europe. Eastern Europe is particularly impacted by the war in Ukraine and the challenging economic situation there. There's been a dramatic slowdown in purchasing and consumption. And it's definitely impacting certain brands that have a strong presence there.
If you look at Western Europe, it's also a bit of a mixed bag. There are certain markets like Spain, that continue to do well, but we're definitely seeing a significant slowdown in markets like France and Germany, which are very, very large markets. So those are really two markets where we're actually seeing very sluggish growth, even actually some decline in the last couple of quarters, have been declining in France, and that is a very large fragrance market.
Conversely, on the positive side, Latin America continues to do well. I think as the economies improve, as the middle class expands, that will represent, I think, a long tail of growth in the future. And I think Asia has been a little bit more -- I think it's more temporary. We've had to make some changes in our distribution, both in Korea and in India, and that's kind of weighing down a little bit on our growth, but that should eventually pick up once those -- that situation has improved.
And then Jean, I'll let you address...
Yes. The second part of your question, Susan, was are we going to have a blockbuster in the second part of the year. The answer is really like we have said before, this year of 2026 is not a big year for blockbuster. We really have a concentration of new launches, new big blockbuster in 2027. We knew that. That's why we animate the portfolio with flankers. So we still have innovation, but not as big as what we will expect in 2027. It's just a coincidence that we have so many new big launches in 2027. Actually, all our biggest brands will have a new franchise, a new pole in 2027. So for a year without a huge innovation, I think that we are doing quite well.
Okay. Great. And then maybe just one follow-up on pricing. So I think you'll start to lap the price increases you took last year in August. And you talked a little bit about inflation, too, maybe impacting COGS a little bit. So how should we think about pricing kind of as we start to cycle those price increases from last year? Are you expecting to take any more price this year?
Yes. I mean our priority is generally to make sure that we're offering the right consumer value with our offering. We have historically always been very, very prudent with pricing. I mean last year, we had to take pricing because of the tariffs. And we mostly took pricing here in the U.S. Outside of the U.S., there was very, very little pricing. So at this point in time, unless we see something dramatic happening, it's unlikely we'll take any pricing, especially in light of our -- in light of the innovation program.
Now we may take some pricing through -- as we launch new lines next year. It's always an opportunity when you launch something new to elevate the brand, elevate the lineup and price up, but you're not taking straight pricing on the existing lines. It's going to be more innovation pricing. Jean?
Yes. I totally agree. We don't like too much pricing here. We do it when we are really forced that pricing is not the right answer to maintain or increase sales. We think that the retail price of our fragrance is well adapted at the prestige level or at the more democratic level. So I don't see unless something like tariffs happened last year where we were forced -- like everybody else in the industry, we were forced to react. But today, it's not the case.
[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Hamed Khorsand with BWS Financial.
Just wanted to ask you, given that you're seeing the growth in the marketplace with demand that's outpacing your competitors, is this consumers just trying out your products because they're seeing your advertisements? Or is there some sort of loyalty to your brands that you're all of a sudden seeing this year that you weren't seeing in prior years?
Great question, Hamed. It depends on the brand. I think it's a little bit of both. We have some loyal customers coming back when the bottle is empty and they buy again the fragrance. And we have also a lot, a lot of curious new customers that are targeted by our digital aggressive advertising and they come and buy a fragrance from our portfolio.
For instance, I was looking at young boys anywhere from 13 to 17 years old, buying a lot on TikTok, buying a lot on Amazon. And buying quite expensive fragrances. They have apparently the resources to do it. They find it anyway. And this is very interesting for us and we are going in the future to look at these customers. Of course, teenagers, girls were always part of our target. But this is for us a new trend, and we're going to look at this carefully.
Michel, do you want to add something?
Yes. I would just say, I mean, this category is a category where people are always exploring and you have people that are loyal to a fragrance and they wear the same fragrance forever and some of them have a core fragrance that they keep and then they have a couple of new ones that they try on special occasions. But yes, I don't think there's any specific rule.
What's important really is to always be present when the consumer is top of mind. It's one of the reasons that we have spread out our A&P more evenly across the year. As you recall, we used to spend everything in the fourth quarter. We're now spending more regularly. And I think that's helping us sustain demand. And it's also the importance of always looking good in store and being present in all the right channels. And I think a lot of the work we've done in -- whether it's with Amazon or with TikTok in anticipating emerging channels, I think, have been quite successful for us.
Yes, that's going to be my follow-up for both of your comments there actually. So given that you're seeing some sort of efficiency in some ways or response to your advertising online, does that make you want to change your A&P in any way or try to put more weight towards something that you're seeing response? I'm just trying to gauge if there's possibility of upside sales here.
Yes, Michel, you can...
Yes, Hamed. I know you love asking us questions about A&P ROI. And look, the challenge with A&P is you know that it works. You don't always know how everything works. I would say I think the tools have gotten better. But generally speaking, I think we have plenty more opportunities to spend more to get a better return. And I think it's about managing profitable growth, and it's managing the short term, midterm and long term. Certainly -- and that's one of the reasons why you probably heard this in my prepared remarks, if we see more upside coming through in the form of tariffs, we will try to reinvest some of that. We believe that there is more upside here. Again, we want to do this responsibly in terms of managing the top and the bottom line.
And so I would say, we are constantly looking at ROI. If you look at 10 years ago, we were -- everybody was doing TV and now everybody is doing digital, right? So we're constantly evolving. We're investing a lot right now on Amazon, TikTok. So we're always looking for that edge and that ROI, and I think that's a constant optimization opportunity.
Our next question comes from Fraser Donlon with Berenberg.
It's Fraser here from Berenberg. I've got two or three questions, and I'll just ask them one by one, if that's okay. So the first is just about Lacoste. I wondered if you could maybe just help us understand how you're looking at the year as a whole for Lacoste, given the kind of soft start, and I understand the comment on Eastern Europe, but I guess it's quite an important growth lever for EU Ops generally speaking. And I'm just curious if you feel like you can kind of recover some of what you lost in Q1 for that brand specifically?
Do you want to share your three questions, just one or...
I can answer on Lacoste, if you want. I'm not worried at all on Lacoste, to be honest with you. The first quarter, we had a difficult comparison in the first quarter of this year. But I think we can recoup definitely towards the end of the year. And what is important is in 2027, we're going to have a very, very important launch on Lacoste. I saw the product, it was great. The advertising will look great. So Lacoste is in a very good shape. That's true that Eastern Europe was too slow, this explains a weak first quarter, but nothing to worry. Michel?
Yes, I would just add, Q1 and Q2 last year were really insane growth. We grew 30% in the first quarter. We grew 60% in the second. We had a huge amount of innovation, but we're feeling pretty good about Lacoste overall as a brand. And some of the challenges we're seeing this quarter really related to geographic footprint and disproportionate impact. I mean, Lacoste is primarily strong in Europe. And as growth slows down, it's impacting the brand disproportionately, but the brand is very healthy. And I think we're feeling really good about it.
Perfect. And the second question, if I may, was just to ask a little bit how kind of orders trended through Q1, maybe putting Middle East on one side, which is a kind of exceptional circumstance, like do you feel more positive on the rest of the countries now than you did in, say, January or February? And I know that's something that I think the kind of EU Ops management team had commented on at one point that maybe orders improved a little bit as the quarter went on. And on one side, the Middle East.
I can try to answer that. We put our guidance for 2026 in, what, November '25, when we said that we do $1.48 billion. We have not changed our guidance even though there is a big conflict in an important region, the Middle East, which represents 7% of our sales. So it means that we think that we will be able to find some growth outside.
That's also a good thing to have a conservative guidance at the beginning of the year because we sell in 120 countries and with so many geopolitical threat that we can absolutely not control. We do not have to lower guidance, even though there is some difficult times in important regions. So as of now, business is doing well. The orders that we received are in line with our projections.
Michel, do you want to add something?
Yes, I would say we've had -- our orders have been broadly in line with our expectations. We did -- obviously, the dip in the Middle East really -- happened really in March and impacted March disproportionately. We do expect that quarter 2 will also be impacted disproportionately behind this. So today, if we think about Q2, we're seeing Q2 as being, I would say, flattish versus last year also. I think until we see how this thing settles and eventually re-picks up, I think we're going to continue to be prudent.
Clear. And then just third and final question on my side was about the kind of direct-to-retail channel. I know you've, I think, taken in-house Korea because you kind of had to. But are there any markets where you feel like you're close to reaching a scale where you could potentially in-source those? I think you might have referenced those in previous analyst calls. I'd just be interested to hear more about any projects internally you're working on there.
I would say -- yes, go ahead, Jean. No, no, go ahead.
No, no, no. Please, Michel.
Yes. I would say we're very happy with the partnership. At the end of the day, the question is what are you looking for? Are you looking for gross margin? Or are you looking for total shareholder return? And I would say that I think in a lot of the markets where we're currently present, we've got great distributor partners, many of them that we've been working with actually for many years. And I think we're quite pleased with the level of progress and the return on investment. So there's always opportunities, particularly as we grow to consider certain large markets.
But the question is what do you get for it? Yes, you'll get maybe a better gross margin, but you'll also get more expense, you'll have more inventory to manage, you'll have more accounts receivable. So at the end of the day, the way I look at this is, where am I going to get the best TSR? And I think that with the footprint we have, I think we have the best TSR. And if something else comes up at some point in time, which makes more sense, we may consider it. But at this point in time, we're not really looking to convert distributors to affiliates. Jean?
Yes, yes. I totally agree. Korea was an opportunity, we took it. But we can reevaluate, but there is nothing will force us to change from distributors to subsidiaries, absolutely.
We have reached the end of the question-and-answer session. I'd now like to turn the call back to Michel Atwood for closing comments.
All right. Well, thank you again for joining us today. Thank you to our teams also for their continued dedication and agility in navigating in this uncertain environment and also helping us drive the efficiencies and supporting our ongoing success.
I'd like to mention that I'll be participating in the Jefferies Conference in Nantucket on June 16 and 17, so if you'd like to participate, please reach out to your sales representative at Jefferies for information. And if you have any additional questions, please contact Devin Sullivan from the Equity Group, our IR representative. And thank you, and have a great day.
This concludes today's conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time, and thank you for your participation.
Inter Parfums, Inc. — Q4 2025 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Greetings, and welcome to the Interparfums Fourth Quarter 2025 Conference Call and Webcast. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded.
It is now my pleasure to introduce Devin Sullivan, Managing Director of the Equity Group. Thank you. You may begin.
Thank you, and good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us today. Joining us on the call this morning will be Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Jean Madar; and Chief Financial Officer, Michel Atwood.
As a reminder, this conference call may contain forward-looking statements, which involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results to be materially different from projected results. These factors may be found in the company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the headings Forward-Looking Statements and Risk Factors. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made, and Interparfums undertakes no obligation to update the information discussed. Interparfums' consolidated results include 2 business segments, European-based operations through Interparfums SA the company's 72 owned French subsidiary and United States-based operations.
It is now my pleasure to turn the call over to Jean Madar, Jean, please go ahead.
Thank you, Davin. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us on today's call. 2025 was a record year for Interparfums with sales rising to $1.49 billion, including fourth quarter sales of $386 million representing our best ever fourth quarter performance. We saw the industry, including ourselves, returned to a more historically normalized level of growth. And while new and ongoing challenges such as tariffs and exchange rate pressures have influenced the environment. We have been able to manage through them with disciplined operational execution. Fragrance remains a resilient category and is widely considered an everyday essential luxury that delivers an irreplaceable experience of self-expression and daily indulgence.
In 2025, we energized our portfolio through the launch of several blockbuster fragrances and new line extensions across our brands, including the introduction of Solférino, our first proprietary ultra luxury offering and strengthen our marketing efforts with impactful advertising and promotional support. Our diverse portfolio of fragrances attracted consumers throughout the year with impressive annual performances by several of our top brands as well as brands newer to our portfolio such as Lacoste and Roberto Cavalli. We generated growth in the majority of our markets made meaningful progress to improve efficiencies and optimize our supply chain to mitigate cost pressure and support long-term growth and continue to deepen our sales reach on increasingly meaningful platforms such as digital and travel.
We delivered a high level of client service, maintained a strong financial position and continued to skillfully navigate lingering macroeconomic certain key markets, mainly caused by the effect of tariffs and trade destocking and, of course, geopolitical conflicts. Innovation will continue to define our success, including the rollout of brands recently signed or acquired, namely Longchamp, Off-White and Goutal as well as the 15-year extension of our gas license and our strengthening partnership with Authentic Brands Group and their exciting brand portfolio. We will touch on that shortly.
I'm very proud of our team for their hard work and dedication. This record results and continuing operational progress reflect their shared commitment to our pursuit of excellence. Now on to a discussion of our results and operating activities. As we noted on last quarter's call, we expected that fourth quarter sales will be supported by new rollouts late in the third quarter and the robust holiday sales season and that is exactly what happened. Consolidated 2025 4th quarter sales rose 7% on a reported basis and 3% on an organic basis, driven by higher sales for both U.S. and European-based operations.
Sales by our U.S. operations increased 4% in the fourth quarter of 2025, driven by performance from our 2 largest U.S.-based brands, GUESS and Donna Karan/DKNY and even greater growth from Cavalli and MCM. Excluding the phaseout of Dunhill fragrance that was completed in August 2024, full year '25 for U.S. operations, sales declined 3%. Fragrance sales of GUESS and Donna Karan returned to growth in the fourth quarter with increases of 7% and 8%, respectively. GUESS continues to benefit from the ongoing success of the iconic and selective franchise as well as the Q3 introduction of GUESS [indiscernible].
Donna Karan growth was mainly driven by the [indiscernible] BTNY [indiscernible] franchises. For the full year, GUESS sales were flat and the Donna Karan/DKNY declined of 4% was mostly due to unfavorable growth comparisons related to the timing of 2024 product launches. In just the second full year under our management, Cavalli fragrance sales rose 33% in both the fourth quarter and full year, a testament to our ability to elevate a brand profile creatively and strategically. The exclusive May August introduction of Roberto Cavalli [indiscernible] at Dubai Duty Free was highly successful and has helped drive significant brand market share growth in the region. We have expanded the distribution of [indiscernible] globally through multiple retail channels where it is enjoying ongoing success. Additional 2025 Roberto Cavalli rollout included the gold collection extension, the Paradiso extension, the Paradiso [indiscernible] and the striking [indiscernible] sub collection and the dual gender [indiscernible] Cavalli, give Magic Fragrance Door.
In 2026, we plan to keep this momentum going with additional extension that reflects and reinforce the brand established [indiscernible]. MCM fragrance sales rose 40% in the fourth quarter and 17% for the full year, driven by continued performance of a new [indiscernible] MCM collection launched in early 2025. In 2026, we expect to debut new extension to expand the brand. We are excited to be at Milan Design Week with April, where we will have an MCM centric display, highlighting the newest fragrance that we launched in early 2026 where the brand declined 9%. And despite the launch of [indiscernible], fragrance sales at Ferragamo held steady in the fourth quarter, supported by the third quarter launch of [indiscernible].
We remain confident in the brand's potential heading into 2026, where we plan to roll out new extensions across pillars. Sales from our European-based operations increased by 9% in the fourth quarter, driven equally by a 4% rise in organic growth and a 4% positive effect of foreign exchange. Coach, Lacoste and Montblanc led the way in the fourth quarter. For the year, sales increased 7% on a reported basis and 4% organically. While channel performance was mixed among regions, sell-through has been strong thus far in 2026. [indiscernible] our largest brand continued its long term and delivered another year of sales growth. The success of the Jimmy Choo [indiscernible] women's franchise has continued to strengthen since its launch in 2021.
Particularly in the United States, the launch of I Want Choo with Love, combined with the strong performance of the Jimmy Choo franchise helped drive 6% growth of Jimmy Choo fragrance in 2025. We have 2 new extensions in the world for 2026, and we'll be using the year to prepare for a new women's franchise in 2027. Coach fragrance sales increased 5% in the fourth quarter and 15% for the full year, reflecting strength across essentially all of the men's and women's line reinforcing its timeless multi-generational appeal as a mainstay of casual elegant. We benefited from the launches of Coach for men and Coach Gold in the first half of the year. We have had a wonderful relationship with the Coach brand since 2016, and we are incredibly happy to extend our agreement for an additional 5 years through 2031.
We expect to introduce new extensions for the men's and women's line in '26. And similar to Jimmy Choo, we will be using the year to prepare a new women's franchise in 2027. In much of the same way that we rejuvenated Roberto Cavalli, our success with the Lacoste brand was certainly a positive highlight in 2025. In just the second full year under our management, like cost fragrance sales grew 23% in the fourth quarter leading to 28% increase in the full year, reaching $108 million, exceeding our initial expectation of $100 million. The La Coste license took effect in January '24, and we immediately go to work crafting and implementing strategy, and then curating and introducing a collection of fragrances for men and women that key into the timeless elegance of a brand.
In 2025, we enriched the original line with a new men's fragrance called Original [indiscernible] woman fragrance original farm. We also introduced a new [indiscernible] dual gender duo, silver rose and silver gray. In 2026, we will further expand the Lacoste fragrance lines with additional extension, leveraging the solid foundation we have built in our first 2 years overseeing the brand. Montblanc sales rose 22% in the fourth quarter, reflecting the success of Montblanc Explorer Extreme in the second half of 2025 and the strength of the original Montblanc lesion line. This strong fourth quarter performance in combination with favorable foreign exchange helped to offset the sales softness we experienced in the first part of 2025 resulting in full year 2025 sales that were broadly in line with '24.
We plan to launch 2 new little extension in and are preparing for a big launch of a new men's franchise in 2027. The men's fragrance market remains underdeveloped in general, presenting a substantial opportunity for us to continue offering meaningful innovation and expand our reach across our entire portfolio for years to come. We remain optimistic about the future potential of Solferino, our first ultra-luxury direct-to-consumer offering that includes a collection of 10 unique premium sands designed to cater to the growing niche high-end luxury market. Our flagship store in Paris and dedicated e-commerce platform are attracting encouraging levels of consumer traffic. Solferino reached 40 doors worldwide by the end of 2025, and we are on track to expand this artisanal house to an additional 50 in the first half of 2026 with a long-term goal of up to 500 doors at the end of 2030.
We are excited that Solférino has entered the U.S. with the launch of Bloomingdale's online store and in 7 store locations with additional store rollout to come this fall. We have always taken a strategic approach to portfolio expansion, adding brands that strengthen our global reach and long-term growth profile. This year, we advanced that strategy with new partnership that further enhance our competitive position. In January, we announced separate exclusive long-term worldwide fragrance license agreement with David Beckham and Nautica, along with a 15-year extension of our license agreement with GUESS that maintains the relationship through 2048. These distinctive brands reflects our approach to an increasingly global and diverse fragrance market identify iconic category leaders and apply our proven operational expertise to build a sustainable franchise. Our opportunity pipeline is expanding as our ability to elevate and in some cases, revive brands is becoming increasingly recognized in the market.
I want to thank Authentic Brands Group, ABG, the company who co-owned and manage both the David Beckham and Nautica brands, we look forward to a continuing mutually beneficial relationship. While brick-and-mortar remains competitive, e-commerce is running strong, and we are benefiting from our expanded presence at Amazon and early foray into TikTok shop among us. This platform significantly enhanced our global visibility, deliver rich consumer insights and enable us to introduce smaller-sized products that serves as an affordable entry point into prestige and luxury, supporting both recruitment and premiumization efforts. Amazon remains one of our largest and fastest growing most notably, select products within our Donna Karan/DKNY brands. We are continuing to explore ways to leverage the increasingly significant sales potential of this platform, which has firmly established itself as a top 10 beauty retailer in the U.S. as well as the fastest growing.
The travel retail market continued to perform well with sales growing by 6% in 2025 and representing to the approximately 7% of our total net sales, consistent with prior years. Brands, including Cavalli, Lacoste and Coach performed well throughout the year. Our strong appeal among traveling consumers illustrated by the success of Cavalli [indiscernible] in Dubai is helping us secure additional shelf space and broaden our SKU footprint across duty 3 locations. We anticipate steady growth in our travel retail business going forward.
With respect to operational improvements, we've made some good progress against our stated goals in the areas of tariff mitigation, inventory management and operating efficiencies. For example, our transition to 100% third-party providers for packing, shipping, warehousing and order fulfillment should be completed by the end of March of this year. We are also making progress in shifting our manufacturing closer to the point of sales. with a focus on changes that provide a measurable impact. For example, as of December 31, 2025, we moved production for 3 gas lines, Italy, and have since diverted all components shipment from China to Europe instead of the U.S. This one change, which represented approximately 15% of our U.S. manufacturing produced tariff savings of $3.5 million. Retailers maintained a cautious stance on inventory levels throughout 2025, carefully managing their positions amid a dynamic demand environment.
However, we began to see meaningful relief in Q4 2025 as ordering patterns, stabilized and inventories declined. Encouragingly, that momentum has carried into 2026 with healthy ordering patterns since the beginning of the year. The tariff situation has become increasingly dynamic given last week's Supreme Court ruling and the aftermath. While it is too early, way too early to determine the long-term future of tariffs, we continue to focus on controlling what we can control in our own operations and have seen encouraging results. At present, we estimate that tariff costs will remain a headwind in 2026. We will continue to implement strategies and cost savings to blunt this anticipated impact.
These actions will be enhanced by the select pricing actions we took during the second half of 2025 but averaged approximately 2% across our brands. primarily focused on prestige and luxury and the U.S. market. Our pricing adjustments remained more modest than the prestige fragrance industry average as of late 2025. We do not plan to implement any further pricing actions beyond what we initiated last year unless a significant change in the market occurs. Our creative innovation, the continued resilience of the fragrance market and the breadth of our brand portfolio position us to deliver long-term growth. We expect a continuing period of transition in 2026 leading to a more stable market conditions as we prepare for what we expect will be a more favorable operating environment in 2027 and beyond.
As such, we have maintained a quite conservative posture with respect to our guidance, but we will revisit it as the year evolves. Over our 30-plus year history, we have earned a global reputation for excellence and where there is opportunity, we will be there to capitalize on it. I'm also pleased to share that I will be speaking at the womenswear [indiscernible] Summit in Pulp Beach this May, representing our company on an exciting industry stage.
With that, I will now turn it over to Michel Atwood for a review of our financial results. Michel?
Thank you, Jean, and good morning, everyone. I will begin by discussing the consolidated results before breaking them down into our 2 operating segments, European and United States-based operations. As reported, we delivered net sales growth of 7% to $386 million during the fourth quarter, leading to a record $1.49 billion in sales for the full year in 2025. Foreign exchange movements positively impacted our top line, contributing 3% to growth in the fourth quarter and 2% for the full year. However, as outlined in recent quarters, the stronger euro has also driven higher costs across the rest of our P&L as well as on our balance sheet. Organic sales, excluding FX and the completed phaseout of Dunhill and initial sulfur Reno sales in late 2025 rose 3% in the fourth quarter and 2% for the full year, respectively.
Gross margin contracted 20 basis points to 63.6% in 2025, and this was primarily driven by the higher costs due to tariffs. Tariff resulted in about $12.8 million in higher costs in 2025 or 0.9% of sales. We have been able to partially mitigate these impacts through favorable segment and brand mix which each contributed to 20 basis points of margin expansion as well as pricing and leaving us with a gross margin erosion of only 3%, considering the situation and the tariffs. We expect tariffs will continue to represent a significant headwind in 2026 as we annualize these tariffs for the full year. We continue to actively work on cost saving programs and tariff mitigation strategies to help limit these impacts. We estimate that these programs in combination with the full year impacts of the price increases we took in August 2025 will enable us to maintain our gross margins flat in 2026.
Moving to SG&A. SG&A expenses as a percentage of net sales were relatively flat in the fourth quarter at 54.3% compared to 53.4% in the prior year period. For the full year, SG&A increased 80 basis points to 45.5% of net sales from 44.7% last year, and this was driven by higher A&P spending as well as an unfavorable segment mix. A&P investments rose 10% and 5% for the fourth quarter and full year periods as we continue to invest ahead of our growth and in line with our expected sell-out trends. Royalty expenses, which are included in SG&A, average approximately 8% in 2025, in line with our 5-year run rate.
Overall, consolidated operating income and margin declined for both the quarter and the full year as compared to the prior year periods, due primarily to the combination of lower gross margin and higher A&P. Fourth quarter operating income was $28 million for the quarter, resulting in an operating margin of 7.1% as compared to $36 million and 10% operating margin in the prior year period. Full year operating income declined by 2% to $270 million, resulting in an operating margin of 18.2% or 80 basis points decline from the prior year for the reasons laid out before, just above. Below the operating line, we reported a gain of $1 million in other income and expense compared to a loss of $6.4 million in 2024.
The year-over-year change primarily reflects the following factors: first, we realized a onetime gain of $7.6 million related to a debt extinguishment during the fourth quarter. The second factor was a $1.2 million increase in interest income to $5.8 million during 2025 compared to $4.6 million in 2024 as our cash position improved. Third was a reduction in interest expenses on borrowings of $0.7 million. These gains were partially offset by a loss on foreign currency of $3.7 million compared to a gain of $500,000 in 2024. The significant swings in the euro dollar exchange rate throughout the year helped our top line but have led to larger-than-usual FX losses throughout our P&L. Our consolidated effective tax rate for the year was 23.3%, down 90 basis points from 24.2% in 2024 as we benefited from a onetime favorable net tax gain of $2 million in '25, following a positive outcome from prior year tax assessments.
These factors, combined with our disciplined execution and cost management enabled us to deliver net income growth despite the challenging operating environment. Fourth quarter net income was $28 million or $0.88 per diluted share a 16% increase from prior year period. For the year, net income reached a record $168 million with a diluted EPS reaching $5.24, also a 2% increase compared to 2024.
Now moving to our other -- moving to our 2 business segments. I'll start with European-based operations. We delivered solid net sales growth in both the fourth quarter and full year of 2025. Fourth quarter sales increased 9%, driven by 4% organic growth and 4% favorable FX impact. For the full year, reported sales rose 7%, including a 4% organic growth and 2% favorable FX impact. Gross margin for the full year was 66.1% and as compared to 67% in 2024. The bulk of the 90 basis points erosion in gross margin was driven by tariffs, which represented $8.6 million in 2025. While SG&A expenses increased 7% to $474 million SG&A as a percentage of net sales remained relatively flat at 46.7% compared to 46.3% in 2024. The increase in SG&A was primarily driven by a 9% rise in AP expenses the total $219 million for the year, representing 22% of net sales compared to 21% last year.
Overall, net income attributable to European operations rose 2% to $144 million, but as a percentage of sales declined 60 basis points to 14.2%. Now turning to our United States-based operations. In the fourth quarter, we achieved a 4% net sales growth on a reported basis and 2% organic growth, aided by a 2% favorable FX impact. Excluding the phaseout of Dunhill, fragrance that was completed in August 2024. Full year '25, operating sales declined 3%. Gross margin expanded by 40 basis points to 58.3% for the full year driven by favorable brand mix, driven by the 2024 Dunhill discontinuation, channel mix and pricing actions, which more than offset the negative 0.9% impact of tariffs.
SG&A expenses decreased 2% for the full year. However, SG&A as a percentage of net sales rose to 42% from 4.5%, and this was largely driven by our lower net sales with the discontinuation of Dunhill. Additionally, in 2025, we kept our A&P investments steady at 16% of net sales compared to 2024 and made the choice not to reduce other areas of SG&A in light of new licenses, which will be joining our portfolio in future years. Overall, the full year net income attributable to U.S.-based operations was essentially flat at $69 million, representing a 14.3% of net sales compared to 13.3% in 24 so improving margins.
At December 2024, our balance sheet remains strong, was $295 million in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments and working capital of close to $700 million. Accounts receivable was up 17% compared to 2024 on a reported basis. However, the balance is reasonable and based on 2 record sales levels and higher FX impacts of the euro dollar. While day sales outstanding was 73 days, up from 66 days in 2024, driven by changes in channel mix and FX, we are still seeing strong collection activity and do not anticipate any issues with collections of accounts receivable. Despite FX headwinds, inventory levels were down 6% at year-end compared to 2024, and inventory days on hand decreased to 244 days compared to 259 days in 2024 marking our lowest level since 2022. These decreases are a direct result of our effort to manage down inventory levels.
We have also preserved a favorable inventory profile with a higher mix of finished goods relative to components. These improvements position us well to continue to drive further inventory efficiencies, and we will continue to optimize our inventory levels going forward. By effectively managing our working capital in line with sales, full year operating cash flow increased to $215 million, up $27 million from prior year period, and representing 103% net income compared to $188 million or 92% of net income in 2024. We also took advantage of our stronger cash position and the lower stock price levels in the back half of '25 to continue to share our share repurchase program.
In 2025, we purchased $14 million in shares, and we'll continue to evaluate additional share repurchases if the stock price remains below what we believe is the intrinsic value. In the same vein, we are pleased to be able to maintain our annual dividend of $3.20 per share. Now moving to guidance. As shared in our earnings release published yesterday evening, we are maintaining the outlook we provided in November. We expect sales to remain steady at approximately $1.48 billion and diluted earnings per share of $4.85. A decline from 2025 that is referenced above, included a onetime gain recognized in 2025, impacts from tariffs and significant investments we are making to develop our newest brands and support our broader portfolio for 2027.
We continue to anticipate a return to significantly stronger growth in 2027, driven by enhanced innovation across all of our key brands, including the develop and distribution of our newest brands. While we are seeing moderating demand in some international markets, our core fundamentals remain solid. We continue to advance strong innovation pipeline supported by a long-standing relationship with global distributors and retailers. Combined with a stable and resilient consumer base, these trends reinforce our confidence in delivering consistent performance and long-term value.
Before we begin the Q&A section of the call, I want to note that we are anticipating filing our Form 10-K early next week. All audit and reporting procedures are continuing to progress. With that, I'll open up for questions.
[Operator Instructions] And your first question comes from Sydney Wagner with Jefferies.
2. Question Answer
So in terms of revisiting your guidance later in the year, what are some specific metrics that you'll be looking for? Or do you need to see to give you confidence to update the guide? And then just curious, like is the category or your own pipeline or innovation uptake more of the swing factor in that? And then my other question just on promotions, some peers have called out some pressure there. Can you share a little bit more about what you've seen?
Michel, do you want to start on guidance?
Look, I mean we're just starting the year. We had a really strong Q4 but we're waiting to see really what happens. The environment remains very, very volatile. We are seeing a slowdown in market growth. The market growth in the fourth quarter for the markets that we're tracking was up 2%. And and it's definitely starting to slow down. For the year, we're at about 3%. So definitely a slowdown in the market. The destocking situation was a lot better in fourth quarter. We shipped better than expected, and we saw some restocking. At the same time, we believe that structurally destocking will continue to be a factor as retailers and distributors normalized their inventory levels, it's just a normal part of the cycle. And so we're waiting to really see how all of that kind of plays out. In terms of our innovation pipeline, I mean, we have a very, very strong innovation pipeline for 2027.
But for 2026, our strategy is really more of a flanking strategy. So we're waiting to see also how that basically holds up and how that's basically being received in the market before we feel comfortable updating our guidance. I don't know if you want to add.
Yes. Thank you, Sydney, for your question. Regarding the guidance, as you know, this company is -- has always been conservative. And we spent a good amount of time reevaluating the guidance, and we have decided to keep it not to change it because even though we had a quite good January and February, and I think we're going to -- we are anticipating a strong first quarter. The visibility is not great. So we are cautiously optimistic. And instead of retouching the guidance many times, I prefer to wait a little bit more. So it's not a sign that things are not going well. It's just we continue in our approach of being prudent regarding the guidance. The promotion, Michel, do you want to answer on the promotions?
Yes. I mean we've -- as you know, we -- pretty much the whole industry in the U.S. took pricing related to tariffs. Those price increases largely went through -- but we did see an uptick in promotions in the fourth quarter, a little bit more discounting than usual. I think this is normal. In this category, as we don't typically do a lot of discounting. We typically offer the consumer value in the form of giftsets [indiscernible] but I would say there was a little bit more of these friends and family discounts than we have seen in -- normally in the fourth quarter.
Nothing out of the ordinary.
Yes. Nothing significant, but maybe a slight uptick, but nothing significant and nothing of any large magnitude.
Your next question comes from Aron Adamski with Goldman Sachs.
I have 2. First, on the portfolio. After signing of the 2 new brands that you recently announced, do you have any further capacity to secure additional licenses? And in that context, would you prefer to add brands more in the mass end of the finance industry or build up the prestige presence further? And then my second question is on the flank pipeline that you have mentioned for this year. Can you please give us a sense of your expectations of which brands do you expect to gain market share in 2026? And conversely, which parts of the portfolio are you relatively more cautious about at this stage in the year?
Okay, Aron. Let me try on the first one. Do we have a capacity to take more after the signing of these 2 new brands, which are David Beckham and Nautica before I answer the question, let's take 2 minutes to analyze what we think we can do with these 2 brands. David Beckham is an icon. David become as a huge name recognition and we think that in this lifestyle world, we can do well. This is not the first transfer of license that we'll do from Coty. We've done it with GUESS. We've done it with Lacoste. We've done it with Cavalli, all went well. I think that these 2 new brands are a good addition to the portfolio.
Let's not forget that the portfolio of [indiscernible] is very diversified. We go on very high end [indiscernible] to very lifestyle. So we think that this addition and what it brings to us and what we can bring to them is a great fit. So this being said, do we still have capacity after these [indiscernible] And the answer is yes, absolutely. We have the structure, we have the human structure and also the process and the desire to grow the portfolio. So we can take we can take more. And we are working on more and without any guarantees to we'll be able to make announcement. We are working on very important brands. So for us, the evolution of the portfolio is a natural thing to do. We will edit some smaller brands. We will add newer and more important brands. We have the capacity. We have a distribution also.
Let's not forget that we are present in 110 countries, 120 countries through either directly through our distributors, and there is an appetite for newness. So this is for the portfolio and the new brands. Michel, do you want to answer on the [indiscernible]?
Yes. Maybe I'll just maybe just build a little bit on what you said. I think are coming back to our design and our structure. I mean the fact that we operate with 2 segments gives us a lot more capacity to manage bigger brand -- to manage more brands. We also have our hub in Italy which is run by [indiscernible]. So that gives us a third hub. And it gives us the opportunity also to put the right brands in the right places where they will get more will they have access to people that will have more affinity with the brand.
So for example, we will be managing the David Beckman out of Italy whereas we'll be managing the Nautica brand out of the U.S. and obviously, the [indiscernible] out of France. So again, that's part of this. Now I think the other thing is we believe there are many brands out there that are underserved and that could benefit from expertise, as Jean pointed out, we spend a lot of time looking for new opportunities, and we will continue to do so. The timing obviously, between the moment when we have conversations and we get brands, it can take time because, as you know, license it of an expiration date. And if you look at what we've announced recently, even if we have announced the licenses, we don't get them immediately. So that's always a factor, and that continues to play in that fact.
And then on flankers, look, are flankers are really designed to hold share, not necessarily to build share, but they are necessary to drive healthy top and bottom line growth. line starts to basically get a little bit more out. That is when we go out and design basically new blockbusters. And we have a significant pipeline of new blockbusters in 2027 across all of our key brands, whether it's Jimmy Choo, Coach, [indiscernible], Lacoste, GUESS. So we have a significant amount on top of the new launches that will be coming. So really, for next year, what we believe is we still have brands like GUESS, Lacoste and Cavalli will outperform. And [indiscernible], I think, will be more moderate growth, but we'll continue to do well, we believe, with our existing flanker strategy.
Yes. I agree. We are really looking at 2027 as very special year because the 5 biggest brands in the portfolio will have 5 very important launches for blockbuster. And it's quite unusual for us. It happens once every, I don't know, every 10 years. So we are gearing up for that. But we'll have a reasonable growth in 2026 with our strategy of flankers. .
And your next question comes from Susan Anderson with Canaccord Genuity.
I guess maybe just to follow-up on the gross margin. I think you guys were originally expecting maybe a little bit less deleverage in the fourth quarter. Maybe if you could just talk about what happened there versus your expectations? And then also looking to this year, how should we think about the cadence of the gross margin? Should we expect it to be I guess, down in the first half as we still have the tariff impacts and then potentially up in the back to get that flat for the year?
This is a perfect question for Michel. Michel, go ahead.
Yes. Look, I mean, the gross margin in quarter 4 looks pretty erosion, looks pretty scary. I think when you see the 300 bps and it's a combination of a lot of puts and calls that all basically went in the opposite direction, right? So sometimes these things tend to neutralize themselves. But in this particular case, basically, they were all unfavorable. So really, if you really look at what happened, first of all, you have the tariff impact, which hit us fully. We -- there's always a ramp-up with the FIFO and as we buy inventory, it kind of makes its way through. It made its way fully into the fourth quarter, and that basically represented about 2 points for the quarter. The other thing that we talked about is foreign exchange.
So foreign exchange to help us on the top line, but really hurt us significantly because a lot of the products that we sell are actually made in Europe. And so what the cost base in euros were [indiscernible] were basically in USD. So that represented and just for perspective, the euro was at $1.07 last year. And was it [indiscernible] this year. So that represented about 50% of our sales are denominated in dollars. So that would also had a significant impact. And the last piece is it's a little technical, but it's channel mix.
As you know, some of our businesses would direct to retailers with higher gross margin but also higher A&P and some of our businesses with distributors with lower gross margins and lower A&P. And in the fourth quarter, we had significantly more of our business was through the distributors rather than direct to retail. It was about 68% mix of business versus 63. So it's a combination of all those factors, and it's true that it looks a little bit scary. But overall, going back to next year, we feel that we have good mitigation strategy in place that will enable us to kind of get to roughly a flat gross margin. And yes, we should see some hurts in the first and second quarter. And we should see improvements in the third and fourth quarter as we lap our tariff impacts in the back half of the year and our cost savings and cost savings and efficiency programs actually start to kick in.
Your next question comes from Hamed Khorsand with BWS Financial.
Jean, I just wanted to ask you, you've talked a lot about the top 5, [indiscernible]. Is there anything in your other brands that could be a breakout situation for you to get into the top 5? Or you're not expecting that this year?
This year, breaking to top 5, I don't think, so -- Michel.
No. I mean, Hamed, look, I mean, I think our top our is brands are really basically are really -- our engines of growth and their diverse they mean in the various categories, price points, gender. I think those are really where we're going to get the growth going forward. And I think, effectively, the tail end of the portfolio will either be stable with brands like [indiscernible] or we'll probably continue to decline. And then those will eventually bleed out and probably be opportunities for us to consider exits. As Jean talked about cleaning up our portfolio.
I don't think that the top 5 are brands that are anywhere above or around the $200 million the second tier is really below that. So there is quite a difference between the first year and the second year. But we will add with new license that we are taking. I think that [indiscernible] has a great potential. We think that Nautica has a great potential. David became also. So let's not forget, if we take Lacoste, we took Lacoste, we doubled the sales in less than 3 years. We took Cavalli. We increased the sales 50% in 2 years. So we know how to -- what to do with new brands. And I think that there is a lot of potential for the new brand in the portfolio.
Got it. And then Michel, on the working capital and there was a considerable amount of free cash flow generation in Q4. I think that's very seasonal. But is there potential for more here as you try to wind down some of the inventory? Or is that more just a function of how the industry is right now with the destocking?
Yes. Well, look, I mean one of the upsides of sales starting to normalize as you kind of -- you're not investing as much in working capital, right? So definitely, the sales normalization has helped us basically deliver working capital improvements, but we've also done a lot of good work in terms of managing out those inventories. And I think we're going to continue to see that, and we're going to continue to see strong operating cash flow productivity going forward.
And your next question comes from Aron Adamski, with Goldman Sachs.
I wanted to quickly ask on the trends that you're seeing across your key regions or by geography so far in 2026. Where are you seeing the strongest whether it's your own -- the demand for your own brands for the category as a whole so far in 2026. And conversely, in which geographies have you seen maybe a relatively slower start to the year than you expected?
I'm going to try, but Michel follow this very carefully. What I see is the U.S. is doing well very quick short words. The U.S. is doing well. Southern Europe is doing fine. Northern Europe is more difficult. Eastern Europe is okay. This is for the U.S. and Europe. Asia for us, China continues to be slow, nothing new. Australia is showing some sign of -- some strong signs of growth. We traveled a lot in the first 2 months of the year to make sure that the Christmas went well. What I see is, in general, the level of inventory in stores or our distributors is not high, which is a good sign. Sell-through was good. Nobody is holding too much the level of reorders is quite strong. So we're not really worried. Michel, I'm sure you can add.
Yes, I would just build on that, Jean, say LatAm, obviously continues to do very, very well. I think our brand portfolio is really resonating well with the consumers. And then in Asia, while we had a little bit slower sales, we fixed our distribution in India and Korea, and I think we'll expect to see some good bounce back in 2026 behind that intervention on top of what effectively you just said for Australia.
And there are no further questions at this time. So I'll hand the floor back to Michel Atwood for closing remarks.
All right. Well, thank you again for joining our call today. Before I end the call, I'd like to express my sincere appreciation once again to our teams for their tremendous effort throughout 2025. Our achievements are a direct reflection of our people, their dedication, creativity and the unique contributions they bring every day and particularly the agility that we've had to deal with this year with all of the moving pieces that we all are aware of. If you have any additional questions, please contact David Sullivan from the Equity Group, our Investor Relations representative. And thank you, and have a great day.
Thank you. Thank you.
Thank you. This concludes today's conference. All participants may disconnect.
Inter Parfums, Inc. — Q3 2025 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Greetings, and welcome to Interparfums Inc.'s 2025 Third Quarter Conference Call and Webcast. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded.
At this time, I'd like to turn the call over to Karin Daly, Vice President at The Equity Group and Interparfums' Investor Relations representative. Thank you. You may begin.
Thank you, operator. Joining us on the call today will be Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Jean Madar; and Chief Financial Officer, Michel Atwood.
As a reminder, this conference call may contain forward-looking statements which involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results to be materially different from projected results. These factors may be found in the company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the headings Forward-Looking Statements and Risk Factors. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made, and Interparfums undertakes no obligation to update the information discussed. Interparfums' consolidated results include 2 business segments: European-based operations through Interparfums SA, the company's 72% owned French subsidiary; and United States-based operations.
It's now my pleasure to turn the call over to Jean Madar. Jean?
Thank you, Karin. Good morning, everyone. Consistent with what we started to see in the second quarter, sales continued to moderate in the third quarter as macroeconomic conditions remain uncertain. We are leaning further into innovation across our portfolio, focusing on product enhancement and new launches that better meet the dynamic preferences of consumers around the world. These efforts are backed by compelling advertising and promotional support, increase brand awareness, drive consumer penetration and strengthen our overall competitive position.
As announced last month, third quarter and year-to-date sales were up 1% for both periods, with European-based operations sales rising 5% for the first quarter, building on top of last year's momentum, plus a stronger euro compared to the dollar, while U.S.-based operations sales declined 5% for the third quarter, excluding Dunhill. For our largest brand, Jimmy Choo Fragrance sales surged 16% during the quarter, largely driven by the I Want Choo fragrance family and also Jimmy Choo Man. In addition, the 6% quarter-over-quarter growth in Coach fragrance sales was fueled by its established lines and the launch of Coach Gold, while Montblanc fragrance sales dipped slightly due to innovation phasing and Lacoste fragrances are on track for $100 million in sales this year. I would like to note that in the first 9 months of 2024, sales by U.S.-based operations rose 11% with the addition of Roberto Cavalli into our brand portfolio, setting a high bar for this year.
In 2025, we are further capitalizing on this newer brand through the successful launch of Serpentine, the new feminine fragrance from Cavalli. Additionally, we are seeing increasing consumer demand in Donna Karan fragrance adjacencies such as the very popular deodorants. We also had new products roll out late in the third quarter that will mostly support fourth quarter sales in our U.S.-based operation, which include La Mia Bella Vita for GUESS, Sublime Leather from Ferragamo, 2 new extensions for DKNY, a new subcollection of Roberto Cavalli called Marbleous, plus the Just Cavalli duo, Give Me Magic, and Abercrombie & Fitch Fierce Reserve. We started Phase 3 of the distribution of Fierce rollout in May to additional countries, including the U.K., and launched Fierce and Fierce Reserve together at nearly 50 different points of sale. We see the momentum accelerating and look to further the brand's reach.
The third quarter was also a milestone for us with the introduction of our first ultra-luxury direct-to-consumer offering, the [ 10-tank ] Solférino collection. Our flagship boutique opened in the heart of Paris' luxury district, and we are now selectively building relationships with approximately 40 retail stores, rolling out the brand thoughtfully. By next September, we have set our sights on 100 doors with the goal of product placement in 500 stores by the end of 2030. As we refine our craft in luxury and artisanal fragrance, we will leverage the insights we gain to elevate and better serve the other brands within our portfolio. We invite you to discover the passion behind Solférino that you can see it in our website, our first fully owned, direct-to-consumer e-commerce channel.
So fragrance sales are accelerating across digital platforms as e-commerce has firmly established itself. In fact, according to Euromonitor fragrance has roughly 50% market share within the beauty category on Amazon. We are seeing similar trends as e-commerce platform continues to be a bright spot for us.
Our business on Amazon is strong. Divabox and TikTok Shop allow us to market and transact smaller sized products, increasing our visibility to consumers looking to play in prestige and luxury with more affordability. All told, the influencer magic of social media plays a powerful role in driving both traffic and purchases on Amazon.
Another important but relatively small channel for us is travel retail, which grew 13% in the third quarter compared to last year, driven by Lacoste, Jimmy Choo [ coats ] and GUESS, as well as others in our portfolio. The popularity of our products across traveling consumer is helping us in securing more shelf space and expand SKU presence at [ duty free venues ]. We anticipate incremental growth in our travel retail business going forward.
Turning to other key operational updates. We are always looking for ways to improve efficiencies and streamline our supply chain to help manage cost per share and support long-term growth. We are confident in the steps we have recently taken, including transitioning to 100% first party providers for packing, shipping, warehousing, and order fulfillment. We expect this to be completed by the end of the year.
We are also actively shifting our manufacturing closer to the point of sale for certain U.S. products produced SKU stalled primarily in Europe and other regions. These operational improvements will help us navigate the ongoing geopolitical or macroeconomic uncertainties with more agility while allowing us to maintain strong service levels.
Regarding tariffs, our view remains largely consistent with that of 3 months ago. We have successfully implemented many of the interventions we had previously identified to limit the expected impact for imports into the United States. Our immediate actions and strategic supply chain initiatives have proven effective, and our last remaining step is to implement a more cost-effective approach, leveraging the [ first sale ] rule for the finished goods that we've brought into the U.S. that are made in Europe by our European-based operations. This will require additional IT development, which we expect to have implemented by the second quarter of 2026.
As noted previously, we also began implementing pricing actions in August, and we are now starting to see the effects. Early indicators show that these higher prices will help offset higher input cost in dollars, but will still likely result in some gross margin erosion. We are also [ being ] more pricing -- we're also seeing more pricing in the fragrance and cosmetic market, namely in the U.S., where we saw unit prices increase during the third quarter by an average of 5.9%, up from 1.2% at the end of June. During the month of September, unit price increases averaged 7.2% for the industry, indicating 5% to 6% pricing mix making its way to the consumer, which will likely slow overall growth.
Of note, we have only taken pricing on select brands, mostly prestige and luxury, as lifestyle brand consumers tend to be more sensitive to price increase. At the company level, our 2% average price increase will continue to take effect through year-end and into 2026. At this time, we do not plan to implement any further pricing actions unless a significant change in the market occurs.
On the inventory front, some retailers are using AI and other tools to optimize their inventory levels. While store level sales have been growing, we are not yet seeing the same strength in new orders as sell-through outpaces sell-in. That said, we are ready to move quickly to make sure retailers have our products on their shelves, should they choose to replenish.
Before I turn things over to Michel, I am proud to share some great news. Women's Wear Daily has named Interparfums the Beauty Company of the Year in the Public Company category. This recognition is truly rewarding and reflects the strength of our brands, the creativity of our teams and the enduring partnership we have built with fashion houses, distributors and retailers around the world. So I was at this event to accept the award on behalf of our talented team and leadership, and I look forward to continuing to explore new ideas and help shape the world of fragrance together with each of you.
So with that, I will turn it over to Michel. Michel?
Thank you, Jean, and good morning, everyone. As reported, we delivered net sales of $430 million for the third quarter, resulting in a 1% increase for both the 3 and 9 months ended September 30, 2025. The impact of foreign exchange aided our top line performance, contributing to 2 points of growth in the third quarter and 1% on a year-to-date basis. But the stronger euro also increased our cost base in the rest of the P&L and our balance sheet.
Organic sales, excluding FX and Dunhill, declined 1% in the third quarter but rose 1% for the first 9 months of the year. Gross margin for the first 9 months expanded by 80 basis points to 64.4% from 63.6% during the prior year period. This was driven by favorable segment, brand and channel mix in the first 9 months of 2025. In the third quarter, however, gross margins declined by 40 basis points to 63.5%, as these favorable tailwinds were more than offset by the impact of higher tariffs on our U.S. imports, which represented about $6 million for the quarter. Although we implemented price increases and also tariff interventions, these price increases happened later in the quarter and only had a minor benefit on the results for the quarter. If we exclude the tariffs, gross margins would have improved by 100 basis points.
SG&A expenses as a percentage of net sales were 38.2% and 42.4%, respectively, for the third quarter and first 9 months of 2025 as compared to 38.9% and 41.8% for the prior year periods. The decrease during the quarter and increase year-to-date reflect a more even distribution of A&P activities over the course of 2025, which totaled $66 million or 15.3% of third quarter sales and $186 million or 16.9% of year-to-date net sales, respectively. We continue to invest in A&P activities ahead of our growth and in line with our expected sellout trends, and we will continue to do so in the fourth quarter.
Overall, consolidated operating income and margin improved for both the quarter and year-to-date compared to prior year periods. Operating income was $109 million for the quarter, a 2% increase, resulting in an operating margin of 25.3% or a 30 basis points expansion from prior year. On a year-to-date basis, operating income increased by 2% to $243 million, with an operating margin of 22% or 10 basis points improvement versus prior year.
Now looking below the operating line. We reported a loss of $7.7 million for the first 9 months of 2025. And this is pretty close to what we had last year, where we had a loss of $7.1 million. The year-over-year change primarily reflects a couple of factors. First, we have higher losses on foreign currency. We lost $4.6 million compared to $3.1 million in the prior year period. And as you know, the significant swings in the euro exchange rate throughout the year have helped our top line, but have led to larger than usual FX losses.
The second factor was the impact on marketable securities where we recorded a loss of $2.5 million in the first 9 months of 2025 compared to a loss of $800,000 in the first 9 months of 2024. Conversely, and thanks to the strengthening cash positions, changes in interest expenses and interest income were favorable year-over-year, with net interest expenses of $1.8 million during the first 9 months of this year as compared to a net interest expense of $2.9 million in the prior year period. Our consolidated effective tax rate on a year-to-date basis was 23.5%, down 20 basis points from 23.7% in the prior year period as we benefited from a onetime favorable tax gain of $2 million in the quarter following a positive outcome from prior year tax assessments. And essentially, it was a mutual agreement procedure that we successfully got through.
These factors, combined with our disciplined execution and cost management, led to third quarter net income of $66 million or $2.05 per diluted share, which is a 6% increase over last year's third quarter. And for the first 9 months of the year, net income is consistent at $140 million, with diluted earnings up modestly $0.02 to $4.36.
Moving to our 2 business segments, starting with European-based operations. As Jean pointed out, net sales rose 5% and 6% on a reported basis and 1% and 4% on an organic basis for the first 3 and 9 months ended in September. Gross margin was 66% for the quarter and 66.6% year-to-date compared to prior year periods of 66.2% and 66.3%. The slight quarterly decline reflects tariff impacts on our European operations, which were partially offset by pricing gains in the United States and favorable brand and channel mix.
While SG&A expenses increased 1% and 5% for the quarter and year-to-date, respectively, SG&A as a percentage of net sales declined by 110 basis points and 40 basis points, respectively. A&P expenses totaled $44 million for the quarter and $133 million on a year-to-date basis, representing 15% and 17% of net sales. Overall, net income attributable to European operations as a percentage of net sales exhibited strong growth, with net income margin expanding 230 basis points for the quarter and 50 basis points for the year.
Turning to our United States-based operations. Net sales declined by 5% and 6%, excluding the phaseout of Dunhill for the 3- and 9-month period. The phaseout of Dunhill Fragrances was completed in August 2024. So at this point in time, we've completely lapped that event.
Gross margin declined by 110 basis points in the third quarter due to transitional tariff impacts and brand and channel mix, but expanded by 80 basis points to 59%, largely due to the discontinuation of the low-margin Dunhill sales that impacted the prior year period. On the SG&A side, SG&A decreased 4% for the quarter and 2% for the year as we put in place strong cost containment measures. However, SG&A as a percentage of net sales rose to 39.7% and 44% for the first 3- and 9-month period, reflecting really, the lower sales. A&P expenses represented 16% of net sales for the quarter and year-to-date basis, representing $21 million and $53 million, respectively.
Overall, net income attributable to United States operations declined 14% to $21 million for the quarter and 20% to $39 million year-to-date, primarily reflecting these lower sell-in. At September 30, our balance sheet remains strong, with $188 million in cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments and working capital of $688 million. Accounts receivable was up 3% from last year's third quarter, slightly ahead of growth, driven by channel mix and foreign exchange.
We continue to have a strong collection activity. We've also made meaningful progress on inventory management this quarter. Inventory levels as of September 30, 2025 decreased 6% and from 2024 third quarter as we remain focused on executing on inventory reduction strategy. The composition of our inventory has also improved with a higher mix of finished goods relative to components. This shift positions us well to continue to drive inventory efficiencies as we get into the year-end.
By effectively managing our working capital in line with sales, year-to-date operating cash flow increased $68 million, up $18 million from prior year period, reflecting 38% of net income compared to $50 million or 28% of net income in the same period last year. Obviously, the cash always is higher in the run up until the last quarter of the year and should get better at the end of the year.
We also took advantage of our stronger cash position and the recent drop in the stock price to continue our share repurchase program. Year-to-date, we have repurchased $7.5 million in shares and will continue to evaluate additional share repurchases if the stock price remains below what is believed -- what we believe is the intrinsic value.
As we have communicated in the past, our fully owned French subsidiary, Inter Parfums Holding S.A., essentially an empty shell, will merge into our French subsidiary, Interparfums SA, which is a public entity. Since IPH hasn't conducted any business, we do not expect this merger to have any material impact on our shareholders. Following the completion of the merger next month, our company, Interparfums Inc., will continue to own roughly 72% of Interparfums SA, but this will now be a direct ownership as opposed to an indirect ownership and will supply -- simplify our corporate structure.
Moving to our current year guidance. And as per our earnings release yesterday evening and reflective of current market dynamics and year-to-date trends through September, we are refining our full year 2025 outlook. We now expect sales of approximately $1.47 billion, representing 1% year-over-year growth, and diluted earnings per share of $5.12, which is in line with 2024. Additionally, while we will provide more formal full year 2026 guidance on Tuesday, November 18, we currently anticipate moderate top and bottom line growth in that year, generally in line with what we are seeing this year. We anticipate a return to stronger growth in 2027, driven by enhanced innovation, including the development and distribution of our newest licenses, Off-White -- Off-White, Longchamp, as well as Goutal.
While demand has moderated in several international markets, our core business and fundamentals remain strong. We have a robust pipeline of innovation, enduring partnerships with global distributors and retailers and a resilient consumer base. Overall, we remain confident in the strength of our business model and our ability to deliver sustainable performance and long-term value, as we have for more than 4 decades.
Okay.
[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Ashley Helgans with Jefferies.
2. Question Answer
This is Sydney on for Ashley. Just curious if you can share a little bit more about what you're seeing heading into holiday maybe that gives you confidence or caution there? And then in terms of the price increase, I would love to hear what feedback you guys received from retailers as well as the consumers. Any extra color there would be helpful.
I can try to answer on the holiday, what do we see for the holiday. We had a strong October. We continue to sell [ gift sets ] in October. Gift sets will arrive in stores in November or December. And our forecast for November is also quite strong. So it means that retailers are continuing to buy. The inventory at store level is not high, as we are monitoring this. in department store on a daily basis, Amazon sales are starting to pick up. But of course, this type of purchase will be done in the last 2 weeks of the year. So this year, we are not worried for the holiday.
Season. Pricing, the second part of your question is about pricing. We took a very modest pricing compared to other companies. And it was, I will say, quite well accepted. We didn't increase prices across all our brands. We selected the most prestige, the most elevated. This is where we think there is more elasticity. And we did not increase prices on the more democratic lines that we have or the more lifestyle brands that we have in the portfolio. But we didn't see too much resistance, neither from retailers nor our consumers.
Yes. Maybe just to build on Jean. I mean, ultimately, I think everybody was expecting that with the impact of tariffs, there were going to be inevitably, some of that was going to be passed on to the consumer. I think clearly, we've seen this across the board and particularly in the U.S. in the third quarter. As I was saying before, we're seeing before year-to-date June, unit pricing, which reflects, obviously, pricing, mix and other factors was up by about 1.2% versus prior year. And we've clearly seen an acceleration in the third quarter. Our unit pricing is up close to 6% and if your really zoom into September, it's close to 7%.
So definitely, there's been a lot of pricing that's been taken. It's not -- it is very selective from brand to brand, but generally speaking, we are seeing that acceleration. And it hasn't really significantly impacted units. Unit sales are roughly growing about 1%. So the market growth is driven by pricing again in this third quarter.
That's helpful. If I can maybe just poke one more in there. And I apologies if I missed, but there was some talk last quarter about just shipment timing maybe shifting between Q3 and Q4. Maybe I missed if you guys mentioned kind of where that ended up shaking out?
Michel?
I mean, we've certainly seen a little bit less holiday sets being sold into the third quarter relative to what we normally see. And we have seen some of that pick up during the month of October, but it isn't significant. I think the main thing here, really, Ashley, is -- Sydney, sorry, is that we continue to see a bit of a disconnect between sell-in and sell-out there. There is -- continues to be a couple of points difference.
The markets are still up. The market actually in the U.S. for the third quarter was up 7% and is up 4% on a year-to-date basis. So consumption remains very, very healthy. We're just seeing -- continuing to see a small disconnect of a couple of points between sell-in and sell-out. And not only for us, but also for our competitors. I'm sure you've all seen all of our competitors have now published their earnings. And pretty much everybody, with the exception of maybe Coty, which was an outlier on the way down, and [ Water ] now on the way up. Everybody has been hovering around 2%, which is pretty consistent in what we posted.
So overall, I think we are seeing at a macro level, this continued destocking that's impacting us. By the way, this isn't any different than what we're doing as well because if you look at our inventories, our inventories are also down as we're trying to get more efficient with our inventory. And of course, everybody is basically doing that.
Our next question comes from the line of Susan Anderson with Canaccord Genuity.
I guess maybe if you could just talk about kind of looking out over the next 2 years, you have a number of new brands rolling out. I guess, how should we think about just that growth profile in terms of what will be driving the growth? Do you think that the combination of these new brands, I guess, how much growth are you expecting them to drive as well as just continuing to grow your existing brands, whether that be the smaller ones or the larger ones?
Yes. I can try to answer. So when you look at the portfolio today, we have added 2 -- excuse me, 3 important license or [indiscernible] trademark. One is Off-White, and we will see sales of Off-White in 2027. We bought also the business of Goutal, which is a prestige line of fragrance. And you will start seeing some business in '26, but more in '27. And more important, I think the largest potential with the license that we signed with Longchamp. Longchamp is a great bag manufacturer. As you know, we have a great journey with Coach. And we think that Longchamp has a great brand territory, which we can exploit for fragrances for Longchamp will be -- can be 3 to 5 years, $100 million. And that's what we are doing. So 2026 will be, I will say, my best because the growth will be modest because we will be working for the important launch at the end of '26, beginning of '27. Michel?
Yes, I would just also say that we have also added quite a lot of brands, quite a lot of large brands over the last couple of years with Cavalli, Donna Karan, Lacoste, and [ the year before ], Ferragamo. At this point in time, if we look at the portfolio that we've added these are large brands, and they're growing -- but obviously, the smaller brands in our portfolio are kind of pulling us down. So there is going to continue to be some work on cleaning up the portfolio and -- so that we can really focus on the largest brands that will drive the business more sustainably going forward.
Okay. Great. And then...
We're still seeing that GUESS, Coach, Jimmy Choo and Montblanc can go at a good pace.
And maybe if I could just add one more on the model. I guess for fourth quarter, how should we think about gross margin now that the price increases have flowed through? I think you said if it wasn't for the tariff, third quarter would have been better by 100 bps. So I guess should we expect that to be fully offset now in fourth quarter on the gross margin front?
Look, it's a great question. The reality is we've done a really great job in realigning our supply chain and looking at tariffs. There is one big item that is -- takes a lot of time to do, which is all the U.S. stuff -- all the European stuff that we import into the U.S. It's a pretty sizable business. And we've been hit not only with 10% tariff, but it's been up to 15%.
It's going to take us a bit of time to basically get the cost of those tariffs down with the first sale rule, as Jean pointed out in the prepared remarks. That's going to, I think, continue to impact us in the first -- in the fourth quarter and in the first quarter of next year. It should get better in the second quarter. So no, I am expecting gross margins to slightly erode, I'd say probably about 50 bps, something similar to what we saw in the third quarter.
We've reached the end of our question-and-answer session. I'd like to turn the call back over to Mr. Atwood for any closing remarks.
All right. Thank you very much, and thank you, all, for joining our call today. With this being our final conference call of the year, Jean and I extend our warmest wishes for a safe and joyful holiday season and healthy and fulfilling new year.
I would like to mention that we will be hosting the Canaccord Genuity team at our corporate headquarters on December 4 for their annual [ Beauty Bus ] Tour. If you would like to participate, please feel free to reach out to the Canaccord Genuity team. If you have any additional questions, please contact Karin Daly from The Equity Group, our Investor Relations representative. And thank you, and have a great day.
Thank you. This concludes today's teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation, and have a wonderful day.
Inter Parfums, Inc. — Q3 2025 Earnings Call
Financial data from Inter Parfums, Inc.
Revenue
Revenue is the sum of all sales generated by a company, e.g. for its products or services.
Revenue (TTM) metric explainedDirect Costs
Direct costs are the costs incurred directly in connection with the manufacture of the product or service.
Gross Profit
Gross Profit indicates how much of the revenue remains in the company after deducting direct production costs. If the percentage share of sales is calculated, this is referred to as the gross margin.
Gross Profit metric explainedSelling and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) include all expenses for marketing and sales as well as the general administration of the company.
Research and Development Expense
Research and development costs (R&D) provide information on how much the company invests in the research and development of its products. The costs are particularly interesting as a percentage of revenue and in comparison to direct competitors.
EBITDA
EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization) is the company's earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. The EBITDA margin is calculated as a percentage of sales.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation represents reductions in the value of the company's assets (e.g. due to wear and tear on machinery).
EBIT (Operating Income)
EBIT (Earnings Before Interest and Taxes) is the company's profit before interest and taxes, also known as the operating income. The EBIT Margin is calculated as a percentage of sales at
.
Net Profit
Net Profit represents the profit or loss after deduction of all costs.
Net Profit metric explainedStocksGuide Premium
| Jun '26 |
+/-
%
|
||
| Revenue | 1,502 1,502 |
3%
3%
100%
|
|
| - Direct Costs | 664 664 |
4%
4%
44%
|
|
| Gross Profit | 838 838 |
2%
2%
56%
|
|
| - Selling and Administrative Expenses | 570 570 |
5%
5%
38%
|
|
| - Research and Development Expense | - - |
-
-
|
|
| EBITDA | 292 292 |
4%
4%
19%
|
|
| - Depreciation and Amortization | 25 25 |
14%
14%
2%
|
|
| EBIT (Operating Income) EBIT | 267 267 |
3%
3%
18%
|
|
| Net Profit | 168 168 |
4%
4%
11%
|
|
In millions USD.
Don't miss a Thing! We will send you all news about Inter Parfums, Inc. directly to your mailbox free of charge.
If you wish, we will send you an e-mail every morning with news on stocks of your portfolios.
Inter Parfums, Inc. Stock News
Company Profile
Inter Parfums, Inc. engages in the business of manufacturing, marketing and distributing wide array of fragrances and related products. It operates through following segments: European Based Operations and United States Based Operations. The European Based Operations segment conducts primarily in France. The United States Based Operations segment includes the sale of prestige brand name fragrances. Its brands include Abercrombie & Fitch, Anna Sui, Bebe, Coach, Dunhill, Hollister, Jimmy Choo, Montblanc, Paul Smith, Repetto and other. The company was founded by Jean Madar and Philippe Benacin in May 1985 and is headquartered in New York, NY.
StocksGuide Premium
| Head office | United States |
| CEO | Mr. Benacin |
| Employees | 662 |
| Founded | 1982 |
| Website | www.interparfumsinc.com |


