MVB Financial Corp. Stock price
Is MVB Financial Corp. a Top Scorer Stock based on the Dividend, High-Growth-Investing or Leverman Strategy?
As a Free StocksGuide user, you can view scores for all 9,093 stocks worldwide.
StocksGuide Premium
StocksGuide Unlimited
Key metrics
📘 Market Capitalization
📈 What is it?
Market capitalization shows how much a company is currently worth on the stock market.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It helps classify companies by size (Large, Mid, Small Cap) and indicates their market presence and relative stability.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Large-cap companies tend to be more stable, often pay dividends, but may grow more slowly.
- Smaller firms may offer higher growth potential but come with more volatility.
- Market capitalization is a useful indicator of company size — but not a measure of whether a stock is undervalued or overvalued.
📘 Enterprise Value (EV)
📈 What is it?
Enterprise Value represents the total cost to acquire a company — including its debt and excluding its cash reserves.
🧮 How is it calculated?
(= Market Cap + Net Debt)
🏛️ Why is it important?
EV gives a more complete picture of a company's value than market cap alone and is used in key valuation ratios like EV/FCF or EV/Sales.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Enterprise Value shows the true cost of buying a company, including all financial obligations.
- It is more accurate than just looking at market cap, especially when comparing companies with different levels of debt or cash.
- Professional investors prefer EV-based multiples because they better reflect the company’s full financial footprint.
📘 Net Debt
📈 What is it?
Net Debt shows how much debt remains after subtracting a company’s available cash reserves.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It indicates how dependent a company is on borrowed money and how easily it can service its debt in the short term.
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Low or negative net debt signals financial strength and flexibility.
- Companies with strong cash positions are better positioned in crises.
- High net debt increases financial risk — especially in environments with rising interest rates or economic downturns.
📘 Cash
📈 What is it?
Cash represents all liquid assets a company can access immediately — including cash, bank deposits, and short-term investments.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It reflects a company’s financial flexibility and resilience — enabling investments, buybacks, or buffer in downturns.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A strong cash position means greater room for maneuver and crisis resistance.
- Cash-rich companies can invest, pay down debt, or repurchase shares.
- But excess idle cash might indicate a lack of growth opportunities.
📘 Shares Outstanding
📈 What is it?
Shares outstanding represent the total number of a company’s shares currently held by investors — excluding treasury stock.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It’s the basis for key metrics like Earnings Per Share (EPS), Market Capitalization, or the Price/Earnings ratio (P/E).
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Fewer shares in circulation typically increase earnings per share — making each share more valuable.
- Share buybacks reduce the number of shares and boost per-share metrics.
- Issuing new shares does the opposite — diluting shareholder value and lowering per-share figures.
📘 Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E)
📈 What is it?
The P/E ratio shows how many times a company's earnings per share are reflected in its current share price — in other words, how "expensive" the stock appears relative to its profits.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
The P/E ratio is one of the most widely used valuation metrics. It helps investors assess whether a stock appears cheap or expensive compared to its earnings power.
🧮 Calculation
📊 P/E (TTM) = Based on earnings from the last 12 months (Trailing Twelve Months):🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low P/E may indicate undervaluation — or signal underlying issues.
- A high P/E may reflect strong growth expectations — or an overvalued stock.
📘 Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S)
📈 What is it?
The P/S ratio shows how much investors are paying for $1 of the company’s revenue – regardless of profitability.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
P/S is especially useful for evaluating growth companies or businesses not yet profitable. It reflects how the market values the company’s sales.
🧮 Calculation
Market Cap = $336.92m | Revenue (TTM) = $188.00m
Market Cap = $336.92m | Estimated Revenue = $161.23m
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low P/S may indicate undervaluation — or low profitability.
- A high P/S can reflect strong growth expectations — or excessive optimism.
- Especially helpful when evaluating companies where profits are low, volatile, or negative.
📘 Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales)
📈 What is it?
EV/Sales shows how much investors are paying for $1 of revenue — considering not just equity, but also debt and cash. It’s the capital structure–adjusted version of the P/S ratio.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It’s ideal for comparing companies with different levels of debt. It reflects a company's true cost relative to its revenue.
🧮 Calculation
Enterprise Value = $394.70m | Revenue (TTM) = $188.00m
Enterprise Value = $394.70m | Forward Revenue = $161.23m
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- EV/Sales allows for capital structure–neutral company comparisons.
- A lower ratio may indicate undervaluation; a higher one may signal strong growth expectations or overvaluation.
- Especially helpful when evaluating high-growth companies with low or negative earnings.
📘 Enterprise Value to Free Cash Flow (EV/FCF) | ex SBC
📈 What is it?
EV/FCF compares a company’s enterprise value with its free cash flow. The metric therefore shows the multiple of current free cash flow at which a company is valued. EV/FCF ex SBC additionally accounts for stock-based compensation (SBC). While SBC does not represent a direct cash outflow, issuing shares as compensation can dilute existing shareholders. Therefore, SBC is deducted from free cash flow in this adjusted version.
🧮 How is it calculated?
EV/FCF ex SBC = Enterprise Value ÷ (Free Cash Flow (TTM) − SBC)
🏛️ Why is it important?
EV/FCF provides a valuation based on free cash flow and therefore complements earnings-based valuation metrics such as the P/E ratio. The ex SBC version additionally accounts for the economic impact of stock-based compensation and provides a more conservative view from a shareholder perspective.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low EV/FCF means that enterprise value is low relative to current free cash flow. The reasons should always be considered in the context of the company and its industry.
- A high EV/FCF means that enterprise value is high relative to current free cash flow. This can, for example, reflect high growth expectations or temporarily weak cash generation.
- When SBC is positive and adjusted free cash flow remains positive, EV/FCF ex SBC is generally higher than the standard EV/FCF.
- The metric is particularly useful for companies with relatively stable and predictable cash flows.
- If free cash flow is negative or very low, EV/FCF has limited usefulness and should not be interpreted like a standard valuation multiple.
📘 Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B)
📈 What is it?
The P/B ratio compares a company’s market value to its book value — showing how much investors are paying for each dollar of net assets.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
P/B is commonly used for asset-heavy industries like banks or industrials. It helps assess whether a stock is trading above or below its net asset value.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A P/B below 1 may signal undervaluation — or weak profitability.
- A P/B above 1 implies the market expects future value creation (e.g., brand, IP, growth).
- Best used for companies with tangible assets and strong balance sheets.
📘 Dividend per Share (DPS)
📈 What is it?
Dividend per Share shows how much cash a company pays out to shareholders for each share they own – usually on an annual or quarterly basis.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
DPS is the absolute value of the payout per share – crucial for income-focused investors and dividend strategies.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A stable or growing DPS often signals a strong, shareholder-friendly business.
- DPS alone doesn’t tell you how attractive the payout is – the stock price also matters (→ see Dividend Yield).
- Long-term dividend growth is often a hallmark of high-quality companies – like the dividend aristocrats.
📘 Dividend Yield
📈 What is it?
Dividend yield shows how large a company’s dividend is in relation to its current share price.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It allows investors to compare dividend payouts across stocks, regardless of price or payout size.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A stable yield can reflect reliable distributions.
- Comparing 1Y and 5Y yield shows whether dividend growth keeps pace with stock price appreciation.
- A low yield isn’t always negative – it can signal strong past performance or growth focus.
📘 Dividend Growth
📈 What is it?
Dividend growth shows how much a company has increased its dividend per share over time.
🧮 How is it calculated?
5Y: Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR)
🏛️ Why is it important?
Consistently rising dividends are often a sign of financial strength and shareholder orientation – especially relevant for long-term investors.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Stable dividend growth is a sign of sustainable earning power.
- High dividend growth can significantly boost your total return:
- If a company pays $1 in dividends and increases it by 15% annually over 5 years, you’ll receive $2 per share in year 5 – twice as much as at the start!
📘 Payout Ratio
📈 What is it?
The payout ratio shows what percentage of a company’s earnings (per share) is distributed to shareholders as dividends.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It helps assess whether the dividend is sustainable – especially in relation to the company’s profitability.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low payout ratio means the company retains more earnings for reinvestment – typical for growth companies.
- A moderate payout (e.g. 25–50%) indicates a healthy balance between returns and reinvestment.
- High payout ratios may seem attractive but can carry risk if earnings decline.
📘 Consecutive Dividend Increases
📈 What is it?
This metric shows how many consecutive years a company has raised its dividend per share – without any cuts or pauses.
🧮 How is it calculated?
(Special dividends are not considered.)
🏛️ Why is it important?
A long track record of increases reflects financial strength, consistency, and shareholder commitment.
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A long dividend increase streak builds confidence – especially in volatile markets.
- Such companies are seen as reliable and income-friendly investments.
- The longer the streak, the stronger the company’s dividend discipline.
📘 Revenue
📈 What is it?
Revenue shows how much a company earns in total from selling its products and services – the gross income before any costs are deducted.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Revenue is one of the key figures to assess a company’s size, market position, and growth potential.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Growing revenue indicates rising demand and can be an early signal of future earnings growth.
- Comparing actual and expected revenue reveals trends in the market environment and analyst sentiment.
- Note: Strong revenue alone isn’t enough – margins and profitability matter just as much.
📘 EBITDA
📈 What is it?
EBITDA stands for “Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization.” It reflects a company’s operating profit before the effects of financing, taxes, and accounting depreciation.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
EBITDA is widely used to evaluate a company’s operating performance – especially across capital-intensive sectors or international comparisons.
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high or growing EBITDA indicates strong operational profitability – independent of taxes, interest, or accounting methods.
- It’s especially useful for comparing companies across sectors or geographies.
- Important: EBITDA is not a net income figure – it excludes key costs like depreciation and interest.
📘 EBIT
📈 What is it?
EBIT stands for “Earnings Before Interest and Taxes.” It reflects a company’s operating profit after depreciation, but before interest and tax expenses.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
EBIT is a core profitability metric that shows how well the company performs in its main business operations – independent of capital structure and tax environment.
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high EBIT indicates strong profitability from the company’s core business – before financial and tax effects.
- It allows better comparison between companies with different debt levels or tax structures.
- Compared to EBITDA, EBIT already accounts for depreciation and reflects capital intensity more clearly.
📘 Net Income
📈 What is it?
Net income is the company’s total profit – the amount left after all expenses, taxes, interest, and depreciation have been deducted.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Net income is the most comprehensive measure of a company’s profitability – showing how much actual profit remains after all business and financing costs.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Growing net income indicates that the company is managing all of its costs efficiently.
- It directly influences valuation metrics like P/E ratio and the company’s dividend capacity.
- Over time, net income trends reveal how resilient and profitable the business model really is.
📘 Free Cash Flow (FCF) | ex SBC
📈 What is it?
Free cash flow shows how much cash remains after a company has covered its operating and capital expenditures. FCF ex SBC additionally deducts stock-based compensation (SBC) to adjust the cash flow for the effect of non-cash SBC.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Free Cash Flow ex SBC = Operating Cash Flow − SBC − Capital Expenditures (CAPEX)
🏛️ Why is it important?
FCF reflects a company’s actual financial strength – independent of reported accounting earnings. It shows how much flexibility a company has for dividends, share buybacks, or debt reduction. FCF ex SBC also deducts stock-based compensation and shows how much cash generation remains after SBC.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- High free cash flow indicates that a company has strong financial strength – independent of reported earnings.
- It is often a solid basis for sustainable dividends and share buybacks.
- Declining FCF can be a warning sign, even if reported earnings remain stable.
📘 Revenue Growth
📈 What is it?
Revenue growth shows how much a company’s sales have changed compared to the previous year – both on a trailing basis (TTM) and based on forward projections.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Forward = (Expected revenue ÷ Revenue in prior year − 1) × 100
Forward growth is based on analyst estimates for the current fiscal year.
🏛️ Why is it important?
Rising revenue signals growing demand, business expansion, and market share gains – especially important for growth-oriented companies.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Growth is the engine of long-term value creation – especially in tech and growth sectors.
- What matters is not just current growth, but its sustainability.
- Forward projections reflect whether analysts expect continued momentum – or a slowdown.
📘 EBITDA Growth
📈 What is it?
EBITDA growth shows how much a company’s operating profit (before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) has increased or decreased compared to the previous year.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Forward = (Expected EBITDA ÷ EBITDA from prior year − 1) × 100
The forward estimate is based on analyst projections for the current fiscal year.
🏛️ Why is it important?
Growing EBITDA indicates improving operational profitability – regardless of financing or accounting effects.
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Strong EBITDA growth signals operational efficiency and scalability – especially during growth phases.
- EBITDA growth can be an early indicator of margin and earnings expansion – but should be assessed alongside revenue and EBIT.
📘 EBIT Growth
📈 What is it?
EBIT growth shows how much a company’s operating profit (after depreciation, but before interest and taxes) has increased compared to the previous year.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Forward = (Expected EBIT ÷ EBIT from prior year − 1) × 100
The forward estimate is based on analyst projections for the current fiscal year.
🏛️ Why is it important?
EBIT growth is a direct indicator of a company’s business performance – taking into account capital intensity through depreciation.
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Rising EBIT signals improving operating profitability – even after accounting for depreciation.
- It’s especially important for evaluating companies with significant capital expenditures.
- Combined with revenue and EBITDA growth, EBIT growth provides a well-rounded view of operational progress.
📘 Net Income Growth
📈 What is it?
Net income growth shows how much a company’s bottom-line profit has increased or decreased compared to the previous year – both on a trailing basis (TTM) and based on analyst projections.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Forward = (Expected net income ÷ Net income from prior year − 1) × 100
The forward estimate reflects analysts’ expectations for the current fiscal year.
🏛️ Why is it important?
Net income is the ultimate measure of profitability. Growing net income signals stronger efficiency, cost control, and sustainable earnings power.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Stronger net income boosts valuation, dividend potential, and investor confidence.
- If profits stall while revenue grows, it may signal margin pressure.
📘 Free Cash Flow Growth
📈 What is it?
Free cash flow (FCF) growth shows how a company’s available cash – after covering operating expenses and capital expenditures – has changed compared to the previous year.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Free cash flow reflects real financial strength. Growing FCF indicates more flexibility for dividends, share buybacks, and reinvestment.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Declining FCF may point to rising investments, increasing costs, or weaker operating performance.
- Especially for dividend investors, FCF growth is critical – since dividends are paid from actual available cash.
- A negative trend isn't always bad, but it deserves closer attention.
📘 Gross Margin
📈 What is it?
Gross margin shows how much of a company’s revenue remains after deducting the direct costs of goods sold (like materials and production). It represents the company’s “raw profit” before fixed costs, taxes, and interest.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Or simply: Gross Margin = Gross Profit ÷ Revenue × 100
🏛️ Why is it important?
Gross margin indicates how efficiently a company can produce or procure what it sells. It is a key measure of product-level profitability and pricing power.
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high gross margin suggests strong pricing power and efficient production.
- Falling margins may signal rising input costs or competitive pressure.
- Compared to peers, gross margin offers insights into the quality of a business model.
📘 EBITDA Margin
📈 What is it?
The EBITDA margin shows how much of a company’s revenue remains as operating profit before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization.It reflects operating efficiency without being distorted by financing or accounting factors.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
The EBITDA margin reveals how much operating income a company generates per dollar of revenue – independent of capital structure and tax effects.
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high EBITDA margin reflects strong core profitability – before accounting distortions.
- It allows for effective comparisons across companies and sectors.
- A stable or growing margin signals efficient cost control and business scalability.
📘 EBIT Margin
📈 What is it?
The EBIT margin shows what percentage of revenue remains as operating profit after depreciation but before interest and taxes.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
The EBIT margin reflects a company’s core profitability while accounting for capital intensity (e.g. machinery, infrastructure). It’s especially useful for comparing businesses with different levels of depreciation.
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high EBIT margin shows that the company remains efficient even after factoring in depreciation.
- It’s especially relevant for capital-intensive industries.
- Stable or rising EBIT margins over time are a strong indicator of pricing power and business quality.
📘 Net Margin
📈 What is it?
Net margin shows how much of a company’s revenue remains as bottom-line profit after deducting all costs, interest, taxes, and depreciation.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Net margin reflects a company’s overall efficiency – across operations, financing, and taxation. It shows how much actual profit is generated from each dollar of revenue.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high net margin means the company is not only strong operationally but also manages financing and taxes efficiently.
- Peer comparisons reveal business quality and competitiveness.
- Declining margins despite revenue growth can be a red flag for rising costs or inefficiencies.
📘 Free Cash Flow Margin | ex SBC
📈 What is it?
The Free Cash Flow Margin shows how much free cash flow a company generates relative to its revenue. In simplified terms, free cash flow is calculated as operating cash flow minus capital expenditures. The Free Cash Flow Margin ex SBC additionally accounts for stock-based compensation (SBC). While SBC does not represent a direct cash outflow, issuing shares as compensation can dilute existing shareholders. Therefore, SBC is deducted from free cash flow in this adjusted metric.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Free Cash Flow Margin ex SBC = (Free Cash Flow − SBC) ÷ Revenue × 100
🏛️ Why is it important?
The Free Cash Flow Margin shows how efficiently a company converts its revenue into free cash flow. Strong free cash flow can provide financial flexibility for dividends, share buybacks, debt repayment, or further investments. The ex SBC version additionally accounts for the economic impact of stock-based compensation and therefore provides a more conservative view of cash generation from a shareholder perspective.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high Free Cash Flow Margin shows that a company converts a high proportion of its revenue into free cash flow.
- This can provide greater financial flexibility for dividends, share buybacks, debt repayment, or investments.
- The Free Cash Flow Margin ex SBC additionally accounts for potential shareholder dilution from stock-based compensation.
- The long-term trend is particularly important. Declining margins can, for example, result from higher investments, changes in working capital, or weaker operating performance.
📘 Equity Ratio
📈 What is it?
The equity ratio indicates what portion of a company’s total assets is financed by shareholders’ equity – in other words, how much it relies on its own capital.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
A high equity ratio reflects financial strength and stability, especially during downturns. It’s a key indicator of a company’s solvency and long-term risk profile.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Companies with high equity ratios are generally more resilient and less dependent on external debt.
- Low equity ratios can signal higher risk or aggressive financial strategies.
- Important: Always assess the equity ratio in combination with the return on equity (ROE). This shows not just how stable the company is – but also how efficiently it uses shareholder capital.
📘 Return on Equity (ROE)
📈 What is it?
Return on equity (ROE) shows how efficiently a company uses its shareholders’ equity to generate profit. In other words: how much net income is earned per dollar of equity.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
ROE is a core profitability metric. It helps investors understand whether a company delivers attractive returns on the capital provided by its shareholders.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high ROE indicates that the company is using its capital efficiently and profitably.
- It’s especially meaningful for capital-intensive businesses or firms with high equity bases.
- Important: A very high ROE can also result from high debt levels – always interpret it alongside the equity ratio to assess financial health.
📘 Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
📈 What is it?
ROCE measures how efficiently a company generates profits from its total capital – including both equity and interest-bearing debt.
🧮 How is it calculated?
It evaluates the return on all capital employed, regardless of how it’s financed.
🏛️ Why is it important?
ROCE is ideal for comparing companies with different financing structures. It shows how well management uses capital to create value for both shareholders and creditors.
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high ROCE means the company uses its capital efficiently – regardless of whether it's funded by debt or equity.
- The higher the ROCE compared to peers, the more value the company creates with its invested capital.
- Especially relevant for capital-intensive sectors like industrials, energy, or infrastructure.
📘 Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
📈 What is it?
ROIC measures how efficiently a company generates returns from the capital invested in its core operations – regardless of whether the capital comes from equity or debt.
🧮 How is it calculated?
- NOPAT = Net Operating Profit After Taxes
- Invested Capital = Operating assets minus non-interest-bearing liabilities
🏛️ Why is it important?
ROIC is one of the most accurate indicators of capital efficiency. Unlike return on equity, it is not distorted by leverage and shows how much value is created for all capital providers.
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high ROIC shows how effectively a company uses the capital that is truly invested in its core operations.
- Unlike ROCE, ROIC focuses only on the capital that is actively used to run the business – and that requires a return (i.e. interest-bearing).
- Especially useful when comparing companies with large amounts of excess cash or non-interest-bearing liabilities – giving a more realistic picture of capital efficiency.
📘 Leverage Ratio (Debt-to-Equity)
📈 What is it?
The leverage ratio indicates how much a company relies on interest-bearing debt (such as loans and bonds) relative to its shareholders’ equity.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
This ratio helps assess a company’s financial structure and risk profile. High leverage can enhance returns – but also increases exposure to interest rate changes and financial stress.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low leverage ratio signals financial strength and independence.
- A higher ratio can improve returns in good times but increases risk during downturns or rising interest rate periods.
- 👉 Always interpret in the context of industry, capital intensity, and interest rate environment.
📘 SBC | in % Revenue
📈 What is it?
SBC (Stock-Based Compensation) refers to equity-based compensation granted by a company to its employees and executives. The percentage shows SBC relative to revenue.
🧮 How is it calculated?
SBC as % of Revenue = (SBC ÷ Revenue) × 100
🏛️ Why is it important?
Stock-based compensation is a real cost factor for shareholders. It can increase the number of shares outstanding and therefore dilute existing shareholders. The percentage of revenue shows how heavily a company relies on equity-based compensation and how significant this form of compensation is relative to the size of the business.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A lower figure is generally positive: Stock-based compensation is relatively small compared with the company's revenue.
- A high figure can indicate greater reliance on stock-based compensation and a higher potential risk of dilution. However, it is also important to consider whether the company offsets dilution through share buybacks.
- The trend over time should also be considered. A high but declining percentage presents a different picture from a persistently high or increasing percentage.
- A single-digit SBC-to-revenue ratio is not unusual among many growth-oriented and technology companies.
📘 SBC as % of FCF
📈 What is it?
SBC (Stock-Based Compensation) refers to equity-based compensation granted by a company to its employees and executives. The percentage shows SBC relative to free cash flow (FCF).
🧮 How is it calculated?
SBC as % of FCF = (SBC ÷ Free Cash Flow) × 100
🏛️ Why is it important?
Stock-based compensation is a real cost factor for shareholders. It can increase the number of shares outstanding and therefore dilute existing shareholders. The percentage of free cash flow shows how significant SBC is relative to the cash generated by the company. Since SBC is non-cash compensation, it is typically not deducted as a cash outflow when calculating FCF.
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A lower value is generally favorable. Stock-based compensation is relatively small compared with the company's cash generation.
- A high value means that SBC represents a significant portion of the company's reported free cash flow, even though SBC itself is non-cash.
- The higher the value, the more significant SBC can be as an economic cost to shareholders, particularly when it results in share dilution.
📘 SBC Growth 1Y
📈 What is it?
SBC Growth 1Y shows how much a company's stock-based compensation has changed compared to the previous year.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
SBC Growth shows whether stock-based compensation is becoming more or less significant for shareholders. If SBC increases significantly, it can lead to greater shareholder dilution over time. At the same time, SBC is a non-cash expense that reduces earnings on the income statement but is added back in the cash flow statement.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high positive value is generally negative, as rising SBC can increase the burden on shareholders, particularly through potential dilution.
- What matters is whether the development of SBC is sustainable over the long term. Some level of SBC is common among many growth and technology companies.
📘 Share Count Growth 1Y
📈 What is it?
Share Count Growth 1Y shows how much the number of shares outstanding has increased or decreased over a one-year period.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
The number of shares determines how many shares the company's earnings and assets are distributed across. If the share count decreases, existing shareholders' relative ownership increases. If it increases, existing shareholders are diluted. The metric therefore makes dilution and share buybacks directly visible.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A negative value is generally positive, as the number of shares outstanding is decreasing.
- A positive value indicates dilution of existing shareholders.
- A declining share count is not automatically positive: It also matters at what price the shares are repurchased and how the buybacks are financed.
📘 Shareholder Yield
📈 What is it?
Shareholder Yield measures how much capital a company returns to shareholders through dividends and share buybacks, relative to its market capitalization. It goes beyond dividend yield by also including share buybacks.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Dividend yield only tells part of the story. When a company buys back shares and the share count falls, each existing shareholder owns a larger part of the company. When the share count rises, for example through stock-based compensation or new share issuance, existing shareholders are diluted. Shareholder Yield combines both into one metric.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A higher Shareholder Yield indicates more capital being returned to shareholders.
- A negative value means the company issued more new shares than its dividends and buybacks make up for.
- Share buybacks are most beneficial when shares are repurchased at attractive valuations.
- Investors should also consider whether dividends and buybacks are sustainable over time.
📘 Earnings per share (EPS)
📈 What is it?
Earnings per Share (EPS) shows how much profit is attributable to a single share – and is one of the most important metrics for evaluating a company's performance.
🧮 How is it calculated?
The diluted share count reflects potential new shares that could be issued through options, convertible bonds, or other rights.
🏛️ Why is it important?
EPS is the basis for many key valuation metrics like P/E ratio, PEG ratio, or payout ratio. It enables comparisons of profitability across companies, regardless of their size.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- EPS captures per-share profitability and is especially useful for comparisons over time or with analyst estimates.
- Rising EPS may signal consistent growth or share buybacks.
- Important: Always use diluted EPS for more realistic valuations – especially in companies with stock-based compensation.
📘 Free cash flow per share (FCF per share)
📈 What is it?
Free Cash Flow per Share shows how much free cash flow a company generates per outstanding share – after investments, but before dividends or debt repayments.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Free cash flow is calculated as operating cash flow minus capital expenditures (CapEx).
🏛️ Why is it important?
FCF per Share reveals how much real cash is available per share – useful for dividends, buybacks, or reducing debt. Unlike net income, free cash flow is harder to manipulate and often seen as a more reliable metric.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- High FCF per share signals strong financial flexibility.
- It shows how much capital the company can effectively reinvest or return to shareholders.
- Particularly relevant for dividend payers and capital-efficient businesses.
📘 Short interest
📈 What is it?
Short interest indicates how many shares of a company are currently sold short – that is, borrowed and sold by investors who expect the price to decline.
🧮 How is it calculated?
It reflects the percentage of a company’s shares that are being shorted relative to the total shares available.
🏛️ Why is it important?
Short interest serves as a sentiment indicator: A high value may signal skepticism or bearish expectations – but also increases the potential for a short squeeze if prices rise unexpectedly.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Low short interest usually indicates market confidence in the company.
- High short interest can be a warning sign – or an opportunity if sentiment shifts.
- Especially relevant in volatile markets or ahead of key earnings releases.
📘 Employees
📈 What is it?
The employee count shows how many people a company employs worldwide – offering insights into its size, structure, and business model.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It helps assess operational scale, labor intensity, and cost structure. Combined with revenue and profit, it enables key metrics like revenue per employee or productivity.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high headcount can signal operational complexity – but also significant growth capacity.
- Revenue per employee is a key indicator of efficiency.
- Especially useful for comparing tech, industrial, or service-heavy companies.
📘 Revenue per employee
📈 What is it?
Revenue per employee indicates how much revenue a company generates on average per employee – a key measure of efficiency and productivity.
🧮 How is it calculated?
The employee count is typically taken from the most recent annual report.
🏛️ Why is it important?
This metric helps compare business models – especially between labor-intensive and technology-driven companies. A high value suggests automation, operational efficiency, or strong value creation per head.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high revenue per employee indicates a scalable and margin-strong business model.
- A low figure may reflect labor-intensive operations or lower value-add.
- Especially helpful when comparing tech companies to industrial or service sectors.
MVB Financial Corp. Stock Analysis
Analyst Opinions
9 Analysts have issued a MVB Financial Corp. forecast:
Analyst Opinions
9 Analysts have issued a MVB Financial Corp. forecast:
MVB Financial Corp. Events
Past Events
|
OCT
29
Q3 2026 Earnings Call
11 days ago
|
|
JUL
28
Q2 2026 Earnings Call
3 months ago
|
|
MAY
19
Shareholder/Analyst Call - MVB Financial Corp.
6 months ago
|
|
APR
29
Q1 2026 Earnings Call
6 months ago
|
StocksGuide Free
MVB Financial Corp. — Q3 2026 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Greetings. Welcome to the MVB Financial Corp. Third Quarter 2026 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions] Please note, this conference is being recorded. I will now turn the conference over to Amy Baker, VP, Corporate Communications and Marketing. Thank you, Amy, you may begin.
Thank you, operator. Good afternoon, and thank you all for joining us today for MVB's Third Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. The company issued its earnings press release earlier this afternoon, and it is available on the company's website at ir.mvbbanking.com. In addition, the company has included a slide presentation that you can refer to during the call, which is also available on the website.
Participating on today's call are MVB's President and CEO, Larry F. Mazza; CFO, Mike Sumbs; and Chief Credit Officer, Tony Eastman. Larry will provide an overview of our third quarter performance and business developments, and Michael will discuss the quarter's financial results in more detail. We will then open the call for your questions.
Before we begin, I would like to remind you that this conference call contains forward-looking statements regarding the future performance and financial condition of MVB Financial, which involve risks and uncertainties. Various factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such statements. These factors are discussed in the company's SEC filings, which are available on our website. The company disclaims any obligation to update forward-looking statements made during the call.
Additionally, management may refer to non-GAAP financial measures, which are intended to supplement, but not substitute for the most directly comparable GAAP measures. The earnings release available on our website contains the financial and other quantitative information discussed today, along with the applicable non-GAAP reconciliations.
With that, I'd like to turn the call over to MVB's President and CEO, Larry Mazza.
Thank you, Amy. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us. During the third quarter, we made significant progress on several important initiatives that are strengthening our underlying business and positioning MVB for continued improved financial performance. We continue to grow net interest income, expand our core net interest margin, diversify our funding base and build momentum across our fintech payments business. At the same time, we maintained expense discipline and addressed specific credit exposure.
Our reported earnings of $0.03 per diluted share do not fully reflect the strength of our underlying business or the operating progress we're making, largely because of the elevated provision for credit losses this quarter. I'll discuss credit in a few minutes. But first, I'd like to walk through the progress we've made across our strategic initiatives, which gives us confidence in the direction of the business.
For those who may be joining one of the earnings calls for the first time, MVB combines a traditional banking franchise with a growing fintech banking platform, serving clients across payments, Banking-as-a-Service and gaming. The combination provides us with multiple sources of funding and revenue and creates opportunities to improve the efficiency and profitability of our overall franchise.
Two of the most important developments this quarter were the continued progress in growing net interest income along with expanding our core net interest margin and the momentum in our fintech payments business. Net interest income increased approximately 18% through the first 9 months of this year compared to the same period last year. In the third quarter, our core net interest margin expanded another 15 basis points sequentially to 4.02%. Several factors contributed to that improvement, including continued loan growth and our effort to optimize the funding side of the balance sheet.
I want to spend a little time on one particular important contributor, the growth of our fintech payments deposit relationships. Fintech payment deposits increased 28% sequentially to $766 million, now representing nearly 1/4 of our total deposits and up nearly 55% from a year ago. These relationships matter more than the deposits themselves because they give us greater flexibility in managing our overall funding base. As we grow these deposits, we can reduce our reliance on more expensive sources of funding, improve our overall funding mix and further diversify our deposit base.
During the third quarter, that progress contributed to a 6 basis point sequential decline in our total cost of funds to 2.07%. We view that as particularly encouraging results given the interest rate environment, and it illustrates how growth in our fintech payment business translates into tangible improvements in the profitability of our CoRe banking operations. We are also encouraged by the continued execution of our fintech partner pipeline. We've now onboarded 9 new fintech partners through the first 9 months of 2026 compared to 5 during all 2025, and the overall pipeline remains robust.
Turning briefly to our lending. We grew total loans by approximately $44 million or 7.2% annualized during the quarter, marking our sixth consecutive quarter of loan growth. We're pleased with the consistency of the growth with opportunities across our lending business.
Now I'd like to spend a few minutes on credit. We took decisive action during the quarter to proactively address specific credit exposure, which contributed meaningfully to the elevated provision of credit losses of approximately $9.9 million. That provision had a significant impact on our reported earnings. It's important, however, to understand both the nature of the exposures involved and the broader trends across our loan portfolio.
Nearly 75% of the increase in nonperforming loans during the quarter was attributed to 1 acquisition and development land loan involving circumstances specific to the borrower and the property. That same credit accounted for almost half of our quarterly provision. We are investigating potential misrepresentations and lack of transparency in the due diligence and appraisal process associated with this loan. Subsequent to this development, we have taken additional broader review of our existing loan portfolio, and we believe this was an isolated case. Also, we have implemented additional steps to further enhance future underwriting standards. We believe the loan is adequately reserved based on our assessment as of September 30 and continue to work for full resolution.
Outside this specific isolated loan, the overall portfolio continues to perform in line with our expectations, and we have not seen broader credit deterioration. We also continue to work through our legacy SBA portfolio, which we began winding down in 2022. The outstanding balance of the SBA portfolio was less than $23 million as of September 30, which includes approximately $3 million in government-guaranteed balances. Approximately 53% of the SBA portfolio is classified and has been individually analyzed for collateral impairments representing 75% of the unguaranteed exposure, while the entire portfolio continues to receive enhanced monitoring and oversight. These are identifiable exposures, and we are actively managing.
I also want to put the current credit metrics in a broader perspective. Since early 2025, criticized loans have now declined approximately 45% from roughly $135 million to $74 million. Over the same period, our allowance for credit losses increased from $19 million to $36 million. Classified loans have also declined materially over that period. We believe these developments reflect meaningful progress in strengthening our overall credit risk profile.
Turning back to the growth in our fintech business. Beyond the benefits we're seeing from payment-related deposit growth, our payment business continues to generate encouraging fee income growth. Payment card and service charge income has increased approximately 22% through the first 9 months of the year and was up nearly 40% compared to the third quarter of 2025. The sequential decline during the quarter primarily reflected normal seasonality within our gaming-related business. We remain encouraged by the long-term growth in payments activity and the growing fintech relationships and pipeline.
Another important area of focus has been expense management. Noninterest expense declined below $30 million during the third quarter, down approximately 2% sequentially and approximately 10% from a year ago. We invested significantly over the past several years in our technology, people, compliance and risk management infrastructure. We're also increasingly using AI and automation to improve efficiency across the organization with more than 100 digital assistants, which we formally call Digis, either developed or in progress. These initiatives are helping us streamline workflows and create opportunities to operate more efficiently as the business grows.
Additionally, we deepened our relationship with Anthropic and now have 14 trained and certified Claude engineers on our team. As I step back and look at the quarter, there are 3 things I'd emphasize. First, the underlying banking business continues to improve. We're growing net interest income, expanding core margin and strengthening our funding base. Second, our fintech payment strategy is generating tangible results. We're onboarding new partners, growing payments-related deposits and building a large base of fee-generating activity.
And third, while the provision weighed on the reported earnings this quarter, we have made meaningful progress in addressing identified credit exposure early and strengthening our reserves. As I mentioned earlier, the primary driver of the elevated provision this quarter was a single isolated loan, and it's not representative of our broader portfolio. The overall loan book continues to perform in line with our expectations.
With that, I'll turn the call over to Mike Sumbs to walk through the quarter's financial results in more detail.
Thank you, Larry, and good afternoon, everyone. I'll provide some additional detail on the third quarter financial performance, including net interest income and margin, balance sheet trends, noninterest income and expenses, credit quality and capital.
Starting with earnings. We reported net income of approximately $438,000 or $0.03 per diluted share compared with $12.3 million or $0.93 per diluted share in the second quarter. The sequential decline primarily reflected a higher provision for credit losses and the absence of a significant investment gain recognized in the prior quarter. As Larry discussed, we continue to see encouraging trends in the underlying net interest income, core margin and fintech payments business.
Net interest income on a fully tax equivalent basis increased to $32.7 million compared with $32.4 million in the second quarter despite the prior quarter, including approximately $2.3 million of nonrecurring interest income associated with the loan payoff. Our reported FTE net interest margin was 4.02% compared with 4.16% in the prior quarter. Excluding nonrecurring interest income in the prior quarter, core net interest margin expanded 15 basis points sequentially from 3.87% to 4.02%, reflecting continued loan growth, lower funding costs and ongoing balance sheet optimization.
Turning to the balance sheet. Total loans increased approximately $44 million or 7.2% annualized during the quarter to $2.52 billion. We are continuing to build out our specialty lending business, which offers opportunities to originate higher-yielding loans. The specialty lending pipeline is strong heading into the fourth quarter. As our portfolio mix gradually shifts towards these specialty lending opportunities, we believe we can continue to grow net interest income and improve the profitability and capital efficiency of our lending operations.
Total deposits were approximately $3.09 billion at September 30, down $24 million or less than 1% from the prior quarter, reflecting a seasonal decline in noninterest-bearing deposits, partially offset by growth in interest-bearing deposits. Importantly, fintech payment deposits increased 28% to $766 million, representing approximately 25% of total deposits compared with approximately 19% at June 30. While point-to-point noninterest-bearing deposits declined in the quarter, the average balance of noninterest-bearing deposits over the third quarter increased by approximately $71 million versus the prior quarter.
This growth allowed us to reduce reliance on higher cost deposit products, including balances we allowed to run off or move off the balance sheet. Together with our broader funding initiatives, these developments contributed to a 6 basis point reduction in our overall funding cost from 2.13% to 2.07%. We ended the quarter with a loan-to-deposit ratio of 81.6%, maintaining a solid on-balance sheet liquidity position.
Turning to noninterest income. We reported $7.8 million compared to $18.8 million in the second quarter, which included a $10 million pretax gain on an existing fintech investment. Excluding that gain, noninterest income declined approximately 10.5% sequentially, reflecting normal seasonality in payment-related fee income and lower contributions from our mortgage investment, which remains sensitive to interest rates and broader market conditions. Payment cards and service charge income totaled $5.2 million, down approximately 13% from the prior quarter, primarily reflecting normal seasonality in our gaming business. However, that revenue increased nearly 40% year-over-year and approximately 22% through the first 9 months of 2026.
On the expense side, noninterest expenses declined to $29.8 million compared to $30.4 million in the second quarter and $33.3 million a year ago, reflecting continued expense discipline and the benefit of the previously implemented cost containment initiatives.
Now turning to credit. The provision for credit losses totaled $9.9 million compared to $4.7 million in the prior quarter. The increase was driven primarily by reserves established against the limited number of identified credits. The provision included a $4.6 million specific reserve on 1 acquisition and development credit and a $3.2 million specific reserve on a small number of credits within our legacy SBA and associated C&I portfolio. Loan growth and adjustments to our allowance model also contributed to the elevated loan loss provision.
Nonperforming loans increased to $46.8 million at September 30 compared to $29.2 million at June 30. Of the approximately $17.6 million increase, $13.1 million was attributable to the single land loan that Larry referenced rather than a broad migration of loans into nonperforming. Looking at broader credit trends, criticized loans declined to approximately $74 million or 3% of total loans compared to $77 million or 3.1% at June 30. Since March 2025, criticized loans have declined approximately 45% from $135 million or 6.6% of loans.
Classified loans increased modestly during the quarter to approximately $50 million or 2% of loans from $47 million or 1.9%, but remain approximately 25% below their March 2025 level. At the same time, we've significantly strengthened our allowance for credit losses, which increased to $36.2 million or 1.44% of total loans compared to $28.2 million or 1.14% at June 30. Our allowance has nearly doubled since March 2025, while criticized loans have declined meaningfully. We believe these trends reflect progress in strengthening our overall credit risk profile. Net charge-offs were $2.5 million during the third quarter, representing 41 basis points annualized of average loans compared to $1.4 million or 23 basis points annualized during the second quarter.
Finally, turning to capital. Our tangible common equity ratio was 9.3% at September 30 compared to 9.7% at June 30. Tangible book value per share was $25.26 compared to $26.52 at the end of the prior quarter, with the decline primarily attributable to an increase in unrealized losses in our securities portfolio reflected through other accumulated comprehensive loss. We remain focused on maintaining a strong capital position while supporting the continued development of our banking and fintech businesses.
With that, operator, we're ready to open the line for questions.
[Operator Instructions] Our first question is from Joe Yanchunis with Raymond James.
2. Question Answer
So I guess to start off, in your prepared remarks, you referenced a few times how your allowance has increased while criticized assets have declined over the past couple of years and quarters. I guess assuming the broader credit environment remains stable, how should we think about a normalized provision expense from here?
Michael?
Yes. Joe, thanks for the question. Yes, I think if you look at the components of the provision this quarter, you can see a significant portion of it was specific reserves really on 2 buckets. One was the land loan that we discussed in the prepared remarks, which is $4.6 million of specific reserves. And then as we discussed in the prepared remarks, we've seen some migration of the legacy SBA book into nonperforming, which was about 3.2% or $3.2 million of specific reserves. So if you strip that out, you can sort of get to what a normalized provision level is absent, specific reserves and go from there. And to the extent there are credits that move into nonperforming, we'll address those. But I think that's a good place to start as you think about a normalized provision level.
Okay. That's helpful. And then I was through the updated presentation, it shows your risk and compliance staff declined to 81 from 116 last quarter, so well below your prior target of 90 by year-end. I guess I'm kind of wondering like how much left is there to cut on the risk and compliance front with you being down so much this quarter? I guess when did those cuts occur in the quarter? Should there be any wraparound benefit and cost saves to the fourth quarter? And just kind of how long can you keep noninterest expenses below $30 million kind of given wage inflation?
Joe, that's a deep question and an important question for us. We've been very -- our team has really embraced AI. You saw my earlier comments -- can you hear me okay?
I hear just fine.
Okay. Great. So you saw earlier in my comments, the relationship with Anthropic. We now have 14 certified Anthropic Claude engineers. They've been working hard. We now have -- as you also heard me say, we now have 100 Digis either. And Digis is what we would call our digital workers, some would call bots. We now have 100 either working for us, working in the field or in the development of that. Our engineers, our 14 engineers have come so far where now the AI is starting to program the Digis. So they're coming along really, really nicely.
So our focus in Julie O'Connor's area, who has risk and compliance, has done a fantastic job of implementing AI in that area. And I do believe there -- obviously, expense cuts are finite, right? And revenue growth is infinite. We believe there is a floor there on the risk and compliance side. You may have 5 to 7 more in reduction there, but that's about it because we have -- as you also saw, we've onboarded 9 new programs, 9 new clients. And we continue to focus probably with another somewhere between 8 to 11 new clients here in the fourth quarter that we will onboard. So we still need to -- even though we have the technology and AI monitoring, we still need the human in the loop.
So as far as expense reduction, we feel comfortable on the level we are. We hope to keep around that $9.5 million, $10 million level into the rest of this year and only a small increase, maybe around $10 million -- $9 million a month versus $10 million a month, $9.5 million versus $10 million going into 2027. So as far as -- there's very few banks that I think that have cut expenses 10% year-over-year while they're growing. You saw excellent growth in the loan portfolio. You saw excellent growth on deposits in fintech. You're looking now at a fintech partnership in our payment side, nearly $1 billion. It's almost $800 million right now and continues to grow. You saw that our NIM was up 15 basis points. Our cost of funds were down 6 basis points. So the trends definitely our friend on the revenue side. And on the expense side, we continue to hold and believe that just holding steady and flat is a big win in this inflationary market.
And in this inflationary market, you just kind of touched on it. One of the other big positives this quarter was the NIM expansion to 15 basis points. Given kind of the shape of the curve here, is that plus 4%, is that defendable kind of at current levels as you start to gain more of these noninterest-bearing deposits to replace higher funding costs? Or do you think there's kind of more room to move higher from here?
Joe, I do believe there's room to move higher. We now have a project inside the bank called margin optimization. We really want to optimize our margin. You know some of our lending programs on the legal lending side with John Madia, with some of our fintech lending, all those are the same level of risk but higher yields on our asset side. So we feel comfortable with that. You saw where our payment deposits are up 28%, and that will help us stay away from any fundraising of higher cost CDs, which will really position us well as far as our cost of funds at least staying steady while we believe our asset side can grow in yield.
Our next question is from Will Jones with KBW.
Will, welcome to the team. First call, glad to hear from you.
Maybe just to close the loop on the NPA from this quarter. I guess, a, was that a criticized loan last quarter? How did you guys kind of go about identifying it? And as you kind of see the playing field as it is right now, is there any kind of defined path to resolution there? Or is it still too early to tell?
Michael, I'll let you take that. We also have Tony Eastman on the call as well, our Chief Credit Officer. We wanted to have him today here just for any clarifications or to dig deeper into questions like this. But we'll let Mike Sumbs kick it off. And if Tony needs to add, that would be wonderful. But Michael?
Yes. Thanks for the question, Will. So yes, that loan was identified as a criticized loan in the quarter. And then as it approached maturity this quarter, we had an updated appraisal ordered on the property, and that appraisal came in significantly lower than the appraised value at the time of the origination. And a lot of that appraised -- the delta in the appraised value is related to entitlements that were associated with the property at the time of underwriting. So we're continuing to gather facts around the situation. We've engaged a forensic appraisal firm to assist in our review, and we're evaluating all available options and remedies as we continue to gather and assess the facts. We did record a $4.6 million specific reserve on it, which wrote the loan down to current appraised value less selling costs. So we're comfortable with where we've marked the loan, and we'll continue to work through options as it relates to resolving the credit as we go forward.
Yes. Okay. I appreciate that color. And you guys gave great color in your prepared remarks as well. I wanted to go to -- in the slides, you guys kind of call out 45% fintech deposits now, 55% CoRe bank. That number has increased in favor of fintech. Larry, big picture question for you. When you fast forward a year, 2 years down the road, what is the right mix of deposits for MVB? Do you continue to see that migration in favor of fintech as you grow that platform and that part of the franchise? Or where could we ultimately see the fintech or how do you ultimately frame the deposit opportunity on the fintech side?
Well, I can jump in.
I'm sorry. I got it now. I got it, Michael, sorry. So when you look at the CoRe bank, well, the CoRe bank is limited as far as its market. And what I mean by that is we have great markets in Northern Virginia, Reston, Fairfax, et cetera. Monica Tressler there is our Chief Deposit Officer and does a fantastic job with her team of growing deposits in that market. That's the thing, though. It is limited to Northern Virginia and West Virginia, which we value and honor those legacy markets.
The thing of it is in our fintech with Jeremy Kuiper, who leads that, he has a national footprint. We have clients in 40 different states. We have a pipeline of 50 fintechs coming on. It's been one of the best markets that we have been in as far as growth. We see that continuing to grow. We will -- I said we're kissing close to $1 billion in those deposits. I believe in the near future, we will be over $1 billion in fintech deposits and have a very robust 2027 in fintech deposits. Our core markets will do well, but you're competing in 2 states versus 40 states and a very robust pipeline. And it's been good, and I think it will continue to grow very positively over the next several years.
That's great...
Low-cost deposits, Will, which are great low-cost deposits.
That's a great segue to my next follow-up here, Mike, you can help us out. When we think -- as we familiarize ourselves with kind of the competitive dynamics on the fintech deposit side, what is the -- in a Fed hike scenario, what is the beta on the cohort of fintech deposits as opposed to the CoRe bank? We obviously saw deposit cost reduction this quarter. Maybe just help frame what you ultimately see interest-bearing deposit costs do over a Fed hike cycle.
Yes. So a couple of pieces on that, Will. It really depends on the nature of the relationship in terms of how we price those deposits. But from a broad sort of a broad brush standpoint, typically, there's some level of deposits that are noninterest-bearing. If they're reserve deposits for some sort of money movement, those are typically noninterest-bearing. For the more sizable deposit opportunities, tends to get into an interest-bearing situation. Oftentimes, we'll index those into the effective Fed funds rate at some percentage. So on that interest-bearing portion of those fintech deposits, there's a 100% beta as it relates to Fed funds. But if it's at a 50% effective Fed funds, you essentially have a 50% beta on that relationship.
So as you think about the overall fintech pool, including noninterest-bearing, it tends to be -- yes, I would say, a lower beta deposit base, which I think you sort of are seeing in the numbers with cost of funds flat to even down this quarter. Some of that's attributable to the CD runoff and the work we've done in that portfolio running off higher cost CDs and remixing out of CDs. But overall, that hopefully gives you a general framework for how those fintech deposits interact with rate movements.
Yes. No, that's great. That's very helpful. I appreciate that, Mike. And Larry, last question for me, big picture. As we kind of start to think about 2027, what the year looks like, what are really your kind of top 3 priorities, if you had to name them for what you would like to see MVB accomplish as we start to think about next year?
I love that question, Will, because we are already focused on 2027. We're really looking forward in a positive way based on the encouragement we have really this quarter. I don't want you to miss the doughnut for the hole. I mean the land loan is disappointing, don't get me wrong, but that is an aberration and a very unique circumstance, which -- this too shall pass. But when we look at 2027, the top 3 priorities, the first one is what I'll call margin optimization. I mentioned that earlier with Joe. Margin optimization is our ability to make higher-yielding equivalent risk loans in the legal lending market and in the fintech sponsorship lending markets. We believe that we will option out loans that are yielding anywhere between 6.5% to 7% with higher yields of closer to 8.5% to 9%. That's our first and most important project. We weight these projects. When I'm saying weight, it's weight, weight them in order of importance and how we focus our resources.
The second one is what we call Prime Capture. That's our second project name. And Prime Capture are these fintechs that we are onboarding. I mentioned earlier that we have nearly 50 fintech clients in the pipeline. There's no way, that's 2 years' worth of fintechs based on our current onboarding, which will be nearly 20 this year versus 5 last year. We've really improved, and I'm really happy with the team's progress on onboarding. We really have done a good job with that. But now we are weighting, weight, the onboarding prospects to -- when I'm saying Prime Capture, for example, I mentioned last month -- last quarter to Joe about our portfolios like wine it has to maturate. Well, as we look at the wine, we're accelerating this through what we call lift and shift. Lift and shift fintech clients are clients that are already in development, the clients that already have a strong fintech client base where the revenue as soon as they're onboarded, shifts immediately to us versus a start-up program that takes months and months and months to maturate and recognize that revenue.
So that's a high priority for us in 2027 is this Prime Capture, capturing these prime clients that are in our pipeline, putting them to the front of the list so that we can lift and shift their revenue to us much quicker than some of these ones that are coming on. If you remember from a previous quarter call, we said we really only recognize about 25% of the revenue because it takes time to maturate. With these lift and shifts, we recognize nearly 100% of the revenue once they're on board. So we're excited about that as 2027 nears and how we are onboarding clients.
The third one is what we mentioned earlier, we now have 14 certified Claude engineers, and that will continue to grow. Our team continues to educate and grow. We have a wonderful partnership with Anthropic. We believe will be a case study for them in the near future of how to use AI and banking. And with that, now with these 100 Digis, what we want to do when we talked about this 10% reduction in cost year-over-year in a growing inflationary market, we want to at least maintain these cost levels and not grow them. And that we do with our onboarding of our Digis, continue to improving our processes. So those are our big 3, 2 revenue drivers and including loans and our fintech, which will also drive lower cost deposits, that fintech onboarding. It's not only driving fee income, but it's driving lower cost deposits and holding our expenses steady to maybe even downward. Those are our big 3.
[Operator Instructions] Our next question is from Janet Lee with TD Cowen.
If I recall correctly, in the last rising rate cycle, you guys went more defense and your balance sheet shrank a little bit as you were playing defense. If you get more rate hikes, is there any different in terms of your strategy? And how should we think about your loan and deposit growth in '27?
Michael, do you want to take that one?
Yes. Janet, thanks for the question. Yes. I think it's a little different this go around. And I would say from a growth standpoint, we're still seeing good opportunities in the pipeline for loan growth, particularly excited about the specialty lending pipeline heading into Q4. And as Larry mentioned on the margin optimization effort, I think a lot of that work can be done in terms of remixing our loan portfolio into higher-yielding loans. Just this quarter, the core yield on loans was up about 20 basis points versus Q2. So while the average balance of loans wasn't up significantly over the quarter. We still saw nice growth in the interest income related to that enhanced yield in the loan portfolio.
And then on the deposit side, we're still seeing really strong opportunities for deposit growth. I think we've had about $300 million in new fintech-related deposits come on over the course of this year. And I don't really see that opportunity changing materially in a higher rate environment. So I think we're set up well as it relates to the balance sheet for continued growth, but also continued mixing of both the loan and earning asset side as well as the funding side.
On the AD&C portfolio, the $13 million, so you took close to $5 million of specific reserves. How should we think about the loss content here realistically? And should we expect net charge-offs to remain sort of in the third quarter levels before trailing back to the 20 basis point range that you've typically experienced? How should we think about the path or the timing around getting back to the normalized levels?
Yes, I'll take that one, Janet. So I would say from a charge-off standpoint, there could be a similar level in Q4 as to what you saw in Q3 as we continue to work through some of the loans that have migrated into the nonperformer. As it relates to the larger AD&C loan that we've discussed on the call, I feel good about where we reserved that loan based on the current appraised value and factoring in associated costs with resolving that or selling that property. It's hard to predict the exact timing of resolution on that particular credit. And as we mentioned, we're still collecting facts around the situation, but we're actively working through it and hopeful to remediate it and resolve it expeditiously.
Okay. Got it. And on the fee income side, you've obviously been adding a lot of fintech partners and payment card and services income have been growing at a very strong pace. But that's been, I guess, somewhat masked by slower or declining equity method investment income. I believe that's somewhat tied to the mortgage performance, but it can only go so much lower. How should we think about the overall fee income for MVB from here versus that -- because it's been kind of range bound in the $7 million to $8 million range per quarter. How should we think about that inflection point?
Yes. So as you mentioned, the payment card and service charge income line items has been growing nicely, and that's the line item we're really focused on continuing to grow and hopeful with all the new partners that we've been onboarding as they continue to mature on the platform, we can continue to support those growth rates. You're correct that the equity method investment is largely related to activity in the mortgage space. So I think the rate environment is certainly elevated, and that's having a direct impact on activity in the mortgage industry. A lot of that increase in the rate environment happened late in the quarter. So I expect there could be continued slow activity in mortgage as rates remain elevated. So we're really focused on continuing to grow the payment card, the service charge income and the equity method income will be largely tied to the overall mortgage market.
We have reached the end of the question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the floor back over to Larry Mazza for closing comments.
Thank you, Max. Thanks to everyone for joining us today. We're encouraged by the progress we're making in strengthening our CoRe banking operations. We've expanded our payment deposits. They're up 28%. Our payment and card service charges are up 40%. Our NIM is up 15 basis points to over 4%. Our cost of funds are down 6 basis points to 2.07%. Our expenses are down 10.5% year-over-year, and our loan loss reserve, we feel is adequate. We remain focused on building on that momentum and delivering stronger financial performance. We appreciate your continued interest and support in MVB and look forward to speaking to you next quarter. Have a wonderful evening.
This concludes today's teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.
MVB Financial Corp. — Q3 2026 Earnings Call
MVB Financial Corp. — Q2 2026 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Greetings. Welcome to MVB Financial Corp. Second Quarter 2026 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions] Please note, this conference is being recorded.
I will now turn the conference over to Amy Baker, Vice President, Corporate Communications and Marketing. Thank you. You may begin.
Thank you, operator. Good afternoon, and thank you all for joining us today for MVB's Second Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. The company issued its earnings press release earlier this afternoon, and it is available on the company's website at ir.mvbbanking.com. In addition, the company has included a slide presentation that you can refer to during the call, which is also available on the website.
Participating on this call today are MVB's President and CEO, Larry F. Mazza; and CFO, Mike Sumbs. Larry will provide high-level second quarter results and commentary, and Mike will discuss the quarter's financial results in more detail, after which we will open the call for your questions. Before we begin, I would like to remind you that this conference call contains forward-looking statements with respect to the future performance and financial condition of MVB Financial that involves risks and uncertainties. Various factors could cause actual results to be materially different from any future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These factors are discussed in the company's SEC filings, which are available on the company's website. The company disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements made during the call.
Additionally, management may refer to non-GAAP measures, which are intended to supplement, but not substitute for the most directly comparable GAAP measures. The press release available on the website contains the financial and other quantitative information to be discussed today as well as the reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP measures.
With that, I'd like to turn the call over to MVB's President and CEO, Larry F. Mazza.
Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us. We delivered strong second quarter results with net income of $12.3 million or $0.93 per diluted share, up significantly from both the first quarter of 2026 and the second quarter of last year. The broad-based outperformance was driven by continued expansion of our net interest margin, disciplined loan and deposit growth, cost management and momentum across our payment platform and fintech business. These results demonstrate the progress we're making in building a stronger, more diversified company with increasing earnings power.
Before I discuss the quarter, I'd like to briefly welcome those who may be joining one of our earnings calls for the first time. MVB is a fintech-enabled bank that combines a core banking franchise with scaled fintech capabilities across payments, Banking-as-a-Service and gaming. This business model provides diversified sources of revenue and deposits while creating opportunities for growth, innovation and improved operating efficiency.
Turning to the quarter. We delivered another quarter of strong loan growth, up 12% quarter-over-quarter on an annualized basis, representing the fifth consecutive quarter of net loan growth driven by continued momentum across several of our specialty lending businesses. That growth, combined with disciplined balance sheet management, contributed to another quarter of meaningful net interest margin expansion of 43 basis points sequentially and continued growth in net interest income. We're also encouraged by the improving trends in our underlying earnings trajectory. While reported earnings benefited from the gain recognized during the quarter, we continue to see increasing earnings power across our core businesses as margins expand, loan growth accelerates and our diversified sources of revenue continue to grow.
Credit quality remained another area of strength. As Mike will discuss in more detail, the overall loan book continues to perform well and in line with our expectations. The higher provision this quarter was not driven by a deterioration in our broad asset quality, but by a couple of isolated and limited loan portfolios that we're diligently working to resolve. Our successful resolution of the largest nonperforming loan during the quarter through full repayment and no loss gives us confidence in our ability to detect potential problem loans early and resolve timely on a favorable term.
Within our fintech business, we continue to see encouraging momentum. During the second quarter, we successfully launched 3 new fintech partners and products across issuing and money movement. Year-to-date, we have launched 5 fintech partners compared to 5 new partnerships that closed all of last year. Those launches will contribute to the long-term strong growth in payments-related deposits and fee income and demonstrates our ability to continue executing against what we believe is one of the industry's strongest fintech pipelines. It is also worth noting that the second quarter has historically been a seasonally softer period for deposit growth within other areas of our fintech business, making this quarter's performance particularly encouraging. Just as importantly, we continue to maintain a robust pipeline of opportunities, providing confidence in our ability to sustain that momentum going forward.
In addition to the strong growth within the fintech banking platform, we see encouraging long-term growth opportunities within our specialty lending business, including the recent addition to John Madia as Head of Specialty Lending. We're excited about the growth trajectory of this business over the next several quarters. Alongside the strong earnings growth, we're also continuing to invest in the next phase of the business. That includes expanding our payment capabilities, advancing our AI and automation initiatives and continuing to build the infrastructure and talent needed to support our sponsorship banking strategy and overall business. These investments are intended to improve how we operate, enhance the solutions we provide to clients, further strengthen our long-term competitive position and strengthen our operational efficiencies.
At the same time, we're seeing the benefit of investments we've made over the past several years in our people, technology, risk management and operating infrastructure. Those investments created the foundation that support our business today, and we believe they're increasingly being reflected in our financial performance through stronger operating leverage and increasing earnings power. As an example, our risk management staffing declined sequentially from 123 to 116 during the quarter, and we see further opportunity to streamline the operations.
Finally, I'd like to briefly touch on another aspect of our fintech strategy. As previously disclosed, we recognized the gain during the quarter related to our existing fintech investment. Together with the successful monetization of our internally incubated Victor Technologies platform last year, these transactions demonstrate our ability to both incubate and invest in innovative fintech businesses. Beyond the financial impact, they also reflect another way they're creating shareholder value while generating capital that can be reinvested to support the continued growth across the company.
To summarize, there are 4 things we'd want you to take away from this quarter. First, our core earnings power continues to build with net income and returns improving meaningfully, both sequentially and year-over-year. Second, our 2-engine model is working as designed. Core banking is growing loans and deposits at a healthy pace while continuing to lower our cost of funds, and our fintech banking platform is scaling fee income and adding new partners. Third, our credit profile improved this quarter with the resolution of our largest nonperforming loan even as we took a prudent forward-looking approach to provisioning. And fourth, we continue to invest in specialty lending, fintech sponsorship, technology and in the regulatory infrastructure that lets us scale safely, all while returning capital to shareholders through our buyback program.
Overall, we're very pleased with our performance during the quarter and the momentum in the business. And worth noting, our team is very hungry for continued improvements throughout the year and beyond. We're excited and confident in the long-term opportunities ahead and the business is well positioned to drive sustained shareholder value. I believe the best is still in front of us.
With that, I'll turn the call over to Mike Sumbs to discuss our financial results in more detail.
Thank you, Larry, and good afternoon, everyone. I'll spend a few minutes providing some additional detail on the quarter before we open the line for questions.
Net interest income increased to $32.3 million during the quarter, a 13% increase from the prior quarter. Net interest margin on a fully tax equivalent basis expanded 43 basis points to 4.16% from 3.73% in the prior quarter. There was approximately $2.3 million of nonrecurring net interest income in the quarter, primarily associated with the payoff of our largest nonperforming loan. On a core basis, net interest income increased approximately 5.5% from the first quarter, while core net interest margin on a fully tax equivalent basis expanded 14 basis points to 3.87%, reflecting continued loan growth, improvement in our funding profile and further optimization of our balance sheet. We expect continued core net interest margin expansion over the remainder of 2026, albeit at a slower pace.
Turning to the balance sheet. Loans increased 3% from the prior quarter or 12% annualized, representing our fifth consecutive quarter of loan growth. We expect loan growth to follow a similar pace in the second half of the year. Deposits increased 7.4%, including 5.7% growth in noninterest-bearing deposits, driven primarily by payments-related deposit growth. The balance sheet ended the quarter in a very strong liquidity position with a loan-to-deposit ratio of just under 80%. Noninterest-bearing deposits represented 34.4% of total deposit balances, further highlighting the quality of MVB's low-cost funding base.
Noninterest income increased to $18.8 million, reflecting the previously announced $10 million pretax gain on an existing fintech investment. Excluding that gain, our core fee businesses was up 7%, led by growth in payment card and service charge income. Payment card and service charge income increased 18% from the first quarter and 29% from the second quarter of 2025, demonstrating positive momentum as we continue to convert on our pipeline of new fintech partners.
While we expect noninterest revenue to grow in the long-term due to the strong pipeline, note that the third quarter is typically seasonally softer relative to the second quarter. On the expense side, expenses were up a little more than $2 million from the first quarter, of which approximately $600,000 was nonrecurring. The increase in expenses was driven by a combination of annual salary adjustments, higher incentive compensation, reflecting stronger financial performance, investment in revenue-generating personnel as well as continued investment in fintech client onboarding efficiency, technology and AI initiatives.
Turning to credit. The successful payoff of our largest nonperforming loan contributed to improvement across several of our key credit quality metrics during the quarter. Nonperforming loans decreased $5.5 million in the quarter to $29.2 million. The decrease reflected the resolution of an approximately $12 million nonperforming loan, which was offset by several smaller credits moving into nonperforming status. The migration into nonperforming was comprised primarily of smaller credits within our commercial and SBA portfolios as well as a portion of a tax refund portfolio that has experienced delays in repayment due to various factors impacting the timing of tax refunds.
Criticized loans and classified loans both declined from the first quarter, demonstrating improvement in early-stage credit quality indicators. Net charge-offs were 23 basis points annualized, down 3 basis points from the prior quarter. Provision expense increased to $4.7 million in the quarter, driven by 3 factors. First, we continue to grow the loan portfolio and reserve accordingly for that new growth. Second, we established specific reserves on a small number of credits in the quarter. And third, we updated certain qualitative factors within our allowance model based on recent economic conditions, which reflect higher interest rates and inflationary pressures from geopolitical events taking place at the time of the model update. Those 3 factors drove the increase in provision despite the overall improvement we saw in our underlying credit metrics during the quarter.
Our capital position remained strong during the quarter. Tangible book value per share increased to $26.52, while tangible common equity ratio remained steady at 9.7%. During the quarter, we also repurchased approximately 48,000 shares under our existing authorization. In addition, the gain recognized during the quarter further strengthened an already solid capital position, providing us with increased financial flexibility, both now and as we look ahead.
With that, operator, we're ready to open the line for questions.
[Operator Instructions] Our first question is from Brett Rabatin with StoneX Group.
2. Question Answer
I wanted just to start on -- you mentioned -- and Mike, my line was breaking up a little bit towards the end of your prepared comments. But I heard you indicate that you expect the pace of loan growth in the back half of the year to be similar. Does that mean kind of low double digit? And then how much of that might come from specialty lines of business? And any thoughts on commercial versus consumer?
Brett, yes, great question. So as I mentioned, we expect the loan growth to continue at roughly a similar pace to what we saw in the first and second quarter, so $60 million to $70 million per quarter. And we're really excited about the specialty line of business that we mentioned in the prepared remarks. So it's hard to predict exactly how much of the growth will come from that business, given it's new, but it has a really strong pipeline. So we could see a really solid chunk of that prospective growth as soon as the third quarter coming from our specialty lending vertical.
Okay. That's helpful. And then on just the build-out of tech and AI, just what that does to expenses from here? Any thoughts on the expense outlook? And then just -- I know you guys are on the front leading edge, so to speak, of bots and AI relative to many banks. Just any thoughts on how you see that improving your operational tasks or anything you could share with us on AI developments?
Brett, Larry, thanks again for joining the call. On the AI side, we feel really confident on where it's going. We see that we call our digis, which we're using some call bots, really coming on strong. We now have 31 digis that they're either built or being built. It's helped a ton, especially in our risk and compliance area. And we have some really good news coming from that in the third quarter as we continue to implement the AI models and move forward there.
I'll let Mike address the expense side.
Yes. So I really think about AI in 2 ways. One, it's really revolutionizing how we work and how efficient we are with the workforce that we have and then the second part is how does that translate into the expense side. And that's really the part where we're taking a very crawl, walk, run approach with rationalizing expenses using AI. We want to certainly have human in the loop on all we do and really be deliberate about how we phase that in. But overall, I'd say we've made the investments, the heavy expense related to AI is sort of baked in. So we see a lot of future upside from an operating leverage and cost management perspective going forward given where we're at in our AI journey.
Okay. With all that said, Mike, what do you think about an expense base from here relative to 2Q?
Yes. So the increase, as I mentioned, Brett, was primarily driven by annual increases to salaries and incentive accruals that took place in the second quarter. So overall, I'd say going forward, we feel good about maintaining or being slightly below where we're at in the second quarter for the foreseeable few quarters.
Our next question is from Joe Yanchunis with Raymond James.
So in the investor deck, you highlighted 10 fintech launches since the second quarter of '25 that have generated about $2 million of revenue and $158 million of low-cost deposits. Do you have a sense for what percentage of those partners have reached their expected run rate today? And how much revenue remains to be realized as those programs mature? Just trying to get a sense for how much juice is left in the lemon?
Joe, I like the lemon squeeze, but we actually see this like a winery. So we're talking about grapes here instead of lemons. What I mean -- we're going with the fruit being banks. But what I mean by that is each one of these fintech clients are like barrel of fine wine. They are in the process, as you noted, of maturating. And it's going to take time for them to come on, as you point out. I would say right now, we're probably at 25% of their -- what we plan them to contribute to the onboarded earnings going forward.
The good news is, as you noted, all of last year, we onboarded 5 new fintech clients. looking at the first half of this year, already, we have onboarded 5 in the first 6 months. But the good news is the second half of the year will potentially look at another 15, which would mean in 2026, we will have onboarded approximately 20 new fintech clients with a good trajectory for both deposits and fee income. We expect those clients to come on, again, slowly, it's again a maturation process. It's like, again, the example of using the wine barrels. But we're very excited about it, and the team has improved greatly on onboarding and getting clients up and running. It's been very, very positive. We're excited about the future there.
That's encouraging to hear.
Just to add a little more on that, Joe. So you mentioned the $2 million of net new fee revenue year-to-date. About 60% of that came in the second quarter, so about $800,000 in the first quarter, $1.2 million in the second quarter. So -- and that's just from new clients. So you can see there's still a ramp-up in what those new clients are delivering to us. We expect that to grow going forward.
So if you got $6 million more of wine coming out of this cohort, are we drinking that in '27? Or are we drinking that in the back half of the year?
Yes, it's a good question. I would say late '26 to early '27 is when we expect to really start to see the full benefit of clients that have been launched on the platform starting in Q4 of last year and Q1 of this year. So -- but keep in mind, I mean, this is going to be a rolling harvest of grapes as we continue to add new clients into the launch platform and they continue to mature on the platform.
That was very helpful. I have to abandon the fruit theme. I can't keep up. But just kind of -- moving to capital. So following both the Victor monetization, the recent fintech investment gain, how are you thinking about capital deployment? I mean, should we think that this gets deployed towards buybacks, additional fintech investments? Obviously, you're still building out the AI capabilities, acquisitions or just kind of for that organic growth that's kind of on the come?
Yes. So clearly, we're continuing to grow the balance sheet. So that's organic growth of the existing balance sheet is sort of first and foremost. And then we were active in our share repurchase this quarter. We bought back about $1.2 million of stock. So we'll continue to be opportunistic. It's going to be price driven on the share buyback. But really, the focus is continuing to grow the platform, the balance sheet and continue to invest in what we see as high return business lines.
Okay. That makes sense. And then lastly for me, you characterized the higher provision as being driven by a couple of isolated portfolios rather than being anything broad-based. Can you provide any more details on some of those portfolios that drove the higher provision?
Yes. So we had about $3.3 million of the provision related to specific reserves. And that was split between our legacy SBA portfolio, which was largely originated in the 2021, early '22 time frame. And we have not been originating new SBA credits for quite some time. And then the balance was across a couple of smaller commercial loans. So generally, isolated and idiosyncratic loans is where we saw the majority of the specific reserve take place in the quarter.
And then as we mentioned, we had some updates to our allowance model taking into account the recent developments, particularly the Middle East with higher inflation -- expected higher inflation and higher interest rates. So that drove some of our general allocations to a higher level.
That makes sense. And actually, I do have one more, if that's all right. So you had talked about potentially another 15 partners that you could onboard in the back half of the year. Is there any limiting constraints to the onboarding process?
Joe, it's very -- we'll keep with the fruit theme. It's very much like a gourmet restaurant. It's not like a fast food type McDonald's thing. Each client has a determining need that you have to really cater to what they have for their product set and what we need to do. That's probably the biggest limiting piece of it. Our capacity has grown from the AI perspective, from a process improvement perspective. Our tech overall has been excellent, but it's really dependent on the client base that we're onboarding. We do prioritize based on something we call REVO, it's R-E-V-O. That stands for risk and then it stands for the effort, the level of effort it will take to onboard, V is value, which is the profitability and the O is the opportunity cost. If you do something, you have to give up something else to be able to do that. So we prioritize based on that Revo, and we push clients through by that. We do see a very strong pipeline of fintech clients.
There's actually continues to be -- last time we talked, there were over 50 in the pipeline. There continues to be over 50, even though we have pushed some through, as we noted earlier. So it continues to be very robust, and I think one of the best in the industry as far as fintech pipelines. So as far as limiting factors, again, it's going to depend on the clients we're bringing on. It's going to be the biggest limiting factor, their needs.
[Operator Instructions] Our next question is from Janet Lee with TD Cowen.
Just going back on credit and provision, is there any more work out to be done on any parts of the portfolio that would have an upward bias to your allowance for loan loss reserve ratio of 1.14% in the second quarter? Should we expect more of these to come for any reason?
Janet, thanks for the question. So clearly, we had a nice build in our allowance level this quarter going from 94 basis points to 1.14%. At this point, we feel like the portfolio is appropriately reserved. But of course, we'll continue to monitor it and make updates to our model as needed.
Okay. Got it. What -- could you explain a little bit around -- you talked about how your NIM should be expanding in the back half of 2026, albeit at a more moderating pace. So are you saying that NIM will increase off of the 3.87% level in the second quarter? And what do you expect for your funding costs to do in the back half of '26?
Yes. So we had a great quarter of NIM expansion, about 14 basis points on a core basis. We do see continued opportunity for expansion of that level. I think more of it's on the asset mix and repositioning into higher-yielding loans and also just the mix shift of our earning assets into more loans. So we really benefited from 3 things in the quarter from a NIM perspective, that was decreasing our funding cost by about 4 basis points, shifting more of our earning assets into loans and carrying less cash on the balance sheet.
So I think from where we're at from a rate standpoint, higher for longer, we still have some opportunity on the funding side, but I think it's going to be relatively modest in terms of decreasing funding costs. We added -- we've added about $150 million of net new fintech deposits, which tend to be net lower than our cost of funding. So help pull that cost of funding down as we reposition some of our CDs and higher cost funding into lower cost fintech deposits. So I think we still have opportunity on the funding side. And really, the other lever that we're continuing to push on is positioning more of our earning assets into loans and higher-yielding specialty loans.
Okay. Got it. Could you give us a refresh on your asset sensitivity profile? Does your NIM benefit if there is a rate hike?
Yes. So we are asset sensitive. I mean a couple of drivers there are having roughly 35% of our deposits in noninterest-bearing status and then carrying a healthy balance of cash, which literally benefits immediately from a rate hike as well as a fairly short portfolio in terms of repricing and a healthy amount of variable. So balance sheet is overall asset sensitive. So would benefit from a rate hike, although it will take a little bit of time for that to flow into the margin numbers.
There are no further questions in the queue. This will conclude the question-and-answer session. I would like to hand the conference back over to Larry for closing remarks.
Thank you, operator, and thank you all again for your time and continued interest in MVB Financial. We're energized by the opportunities in front of us and look forward to updating you on our progress in the next quarter. Have a great evening.
Thank you. This will conclude today's conference. You may disconnect at this time, and thank you for your participation.
MVB Financial Corp. — Q2 2026 Earnings Call
MVB Financial Corp. — Shareholder/Analyst Call - MVB Financial Corp.
1. Management Discussion
Hello, and welcome to the 2026 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of MVB Financial Corp. Please note that today's meeting is being recorded. It is my pleasure to turn today's meeting over to Dr. Kelly Nelson, Chairman of MVB Financial Corp.'s Board of Directors. Chairman Nelson, you may begin.
Good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us today. It is my pleasure on behalf of the Board of Directors of MVB Financial Corp. to welcome you to the Annual Shareholders Meeting. As Chairman of MVB Financial Corp., I am pleased to be presiding at today's meeting. Members of our Board of Directors and management team are attending the meeting virtually today. As you may know, Marty Becker recently retired as Chair and I was elected to chair. We certainly will miss Marty's intellect, his gentle demeanor, his patience, his leadership and his mentorship. Even more special is that we get to keep his friendship and the lessons we learned from him.
Marty, from the entire Board and management team, a sincere thank you for your years of service. If you are a registered shareholder and have logged on to this meeting with a valid control number, you will be able to vote and ask questions about the proposals during the meeting. You may submit questions by entering your question into the designated field on the web portal. I will address questions if there are any about the proposals after they are presented. I have a copy of the notice of this annual meeting and an affidavit of Computershare, the registrar and transfer agent for our common stock, as to the notice of the meeting, which states that on April 17, 2026, a notice of this meeting and notice of Internet availability of proxy materials was mailed to all shareholders of record as of the close of business on March 25, 2026, the record date for this annual meeting.
This affidavit is available if any shareholder wishes to examine it, and it will be filed with the minutes of this annual meeting. Unless there is a request, we will dispense with the reading of this notice of this meeting. There being no request, the reading of the notice of the meeting is dispensed with. Lisa McCormick, the company's Corporate Secretary, has been appointed to serve as Inspector of Election for this meeting. She has signed an oath to act as inspector of election, and this oath will be filed with the minutes of this meeting. The inspector has the alphabetical list of registered shareholders of the company as of March 25, 2026, the record date for the meeting, which shows the registered shareholders, their respective addresses and the number of shares held by each shareholder.
This list was available prior to and will remain available via the virtual meeting web portal during this annual meeting for inspection by shareholders. Secretary McCormick advised me shortly before this meeting began that a quorum is present. So I declare the meeting duly and lawfully convened. I direct the Secretary to file copies of the notice of this meeting, together with the proxy statement, form of proxy and the affidavit of Computershare with the minutes of this meeting. I will now call this annual meeting to order. This meeting will be conducted in accordance with the agenda and the rules of conduct, which you can find on the virtual meeting portal. You can also find a link to the annual proxy statement/prospectus on the portal. You have an opportunity to vote when the polls are open later in the meeting.
Although if you have already submitted your vote via proxy, you need not vote again. There are 4 proposals being considered today. Our Board of Directors has unanimously recommended that the shareholders approve each of the 4 proposals being presented. The first item to be voted on today is the election of 4 director nominees. The proxy statement made available to you earlier listed the company's nominees for director. A plurality of votes cast is required for the election of directors. Three directors have been nominated for a 3-year term expiring in 2029. They are Richard J. Cordella, Jr., Larry F. Mazza and Cheryl D. Spielman. One Director, Adam F. Famularo, has been nominated for a 2-year term, which would expire in 2028.
The second proposal to be voted on at today's meeting is the approval on a nonbinding advisory basis of the compensation of our named executive officers. The company's executive compensation is addressed in the proxy statement that was made available to you earlier. Approval of this proposal requires the number of votes cast favoring the proposal exceeds the votes cast opposing the proposal. The third proposal is the approval to amend the MVB Financial Corp. 2022 stock incentive plan to increase the number of shares authorized for issuance under the plan. The last proposal to be voted on at today's meeting is to ratify the appointment of Forivs as the independent registered public accounting firm for 2026. The appointment of Forvis is discussed in the proxy statement that was made available to you earlier. Approval of this proposal requires that the number of votes cast favoring the proposal exceeds the votes cast opposing the proposal.
Jeremy Goss of Forvis is in attendance at today's meeting and would be pleased to respond to appropriate questions submitted by shareholders, which may be submitted at this time through the online portal. The meeting is now open for any questions that may have been submitted by our shareholders through the web portal. Seeing that we have not received any questions related to the proposals and having presented all matters to be voted on by shareholders, I declare the polls now open for voting on the proposals. We will take a few moments to ensure all of the online ballots have been properly submitted for the proposals being voted on today.
[Voting]
The voting has been completed, so I declare the polls for voting are now closed at this time. While we finish tabulating the votes, I want to take a minute to express my sincere thanks to all of our shareholders who have taken the time to attend this annual meeting virtually and vote their shares. I have been advised by Secretary McCormick that each of the proposals presented today has been preliminarily approved by the MVB shareholders with the directors standing for election having been duly elected for the respective terms as described in the proxy statement. The final results of the meeting will appear in a current report on Form 8-K that the company will file within 4 business days of this meeting.
Having concluded the business as set forth in the annual proxy statement, I hereby adjourn the formal portion of this Annual Meeting of Shareholders. I would now like to introduce CEO, Larry Mazza, who will deliver his CEO presentation.
Thank you, Chairman Nelson. To our shareholders, teammates, Board members, Chairman Nelson and former Chairman Becker. I, as well as all of our teammates are very grateful for your continued support and hard work and commitment you've given Team MVB and you have our sincere commitment to continue to work hard and create and deliver extraordinary value for our shareholders, team and communities. Presentation today will be a brief presentation of where we stand and where we're going. The first slide is our strategy on the page, what we fondly call SOAP. Key thing here is our purpose. Our purpose is to be trusted partners on the financial frontier committed to your success. We support that purpose with 5 values. Our first 3 values of love, trust and commitment validate trusted partnerships. You have to have those 3 values to be a trusted partner.
And to be on the financial frontier, our fourth value of adaptivity is critical. And then commitment to our success -- and to your success -- commitment to your success takes teamwork. Just like it takes a village to raise a child. It takes a team for our 4 constituencies, which are our shareholders, our teammates, our communities and everyone is involved there is what we want to be successful. We look at our growth vehicles, we have Banking as a Service, our FinTech sponsorship lending, our gaming, payments and our core lending and deposits. Our next slide, which is up now is our AI slide and where we are going with this.
This has been a 4-year journey for us altogether. But we have started with cleaning up our database to have a clean database. From there, we implemented Risk Canvas. From Risk Canvas, we worked diligently with a company out of New York called WorkFusion to help us with AI digis, which we are now using in our compliance and risk areas to help us create efficiency, better compliance, and a very good start into our AI journey. Additionally, our team who we have 6 AI teammates that are committed to this area as well as the rest of our team. We work with Claude as our AI software and we have now created 26 digis of our own in-house that will be all rolled out by the end of this year, creating, again, efficiency, better client service and improved risk management.
And going forward, we continue to look at expansion in that area from that. 2025 was a very good year for Team MVB. When you look at our growth in payments, we've had excellent growth of 46% CAGR with the deposit side. And then with the payment revenue side, we had 102% compounded annual growth, which we're very happy with and believe that will continue into the '26 and beyond. When we look at the remix, we see great opportunity, we see CD balances in a good place. And more importantly, we see broker deposits rolling off in a large amount that we'll be able to reprice at a much lower rate and continue to grow our margin in addition to our loan growth, as shown on the next slide. So with a decrease in our deposit cost, an increase in our returns on our loan asset side, you can see we have compounded annual growth rate of 12% on the loan side for 2025, which we're very pleased with, and that team continues to grow.
But not only do we grow, we have grown with quality. When you look at our asset quality, it remains very good. And looking forward, it continues to remain strong. This is part of the biggest and most important thing, asset quality through those cycles. With that, I'll turn it back over to Chairman Nelson.
Thank you, Mr. Mazza. Certainly great news for the bank in the days ahead. I encourage you to reach out to Secretary McCormick, Corporate Secretary and Head of Investor Relations, or Marcie Lipscomb, Investor Relations at 844 MVB Bank. That number again, is 844 MVB Bank, if you have any other questions. Thank you for your support, and thank you for your investment in MVB Financial Corp.
This concludes the meeting. You may now disconnect.
MVB Financial Corp. — Q1 2026 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Greetings, and welcome to the MVB Financial Corp. First Quarter 2026 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions] It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Amy Baker. Thank you. You may begin.
Thank you, operator. Good afternoon, and thank you all for joining us today for MVB's First Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call and our first ever earnings call as a public company. The company issued its earnings press release earlier this afternoon, and it is available on the company's website at ir.mvbbanking.com. In addition, the company has included a slide presentation that you can refer to during the call, which is also available on the website.
Participating on this call today are MVB's President and CEO, Larry F. Mazza; and CFO, Mike Sumbs. Larry will provide high-level first quarter results, followed by a business overview, and Mike will discuss the quarter's financial results in more detail, after which we will open the call for your questions.
Before we begin, I would like to remind you that this conference call contains forward-looking statements with respect to the future performance and financial condition of MVB Financial that involves risks and uncertainties. Various factors could cause actual results to be materially different from any future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These factors are discussed in the company's SEC filings, which are available on the company's website. The company disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements made during the call.
Additionally, management may refer to non-GAAP measures, which are intended to supplement, but not substitute for the most directly comparable GAAP measures. The press release available on the website contains the financial and other quantitative information to be discussed today as well as the reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP measures.
With that, I'd like to turn the call over to MVB's President and CEO, Larry F. Mazza.
Thank you, Amy, and good afternoon, everyone. We appreciate you joining us today for our first ever earnings call. As Amy mentioned, we've included a slide presentation to support today's call, which provides additional details to our business and the quarter, and I'll reference a few of those slides as we go.
We are pleased to kick off the year with strong first quarter results with net income up 45% year-over-year, demonstrating a meaningful progress in our core earnings power. We successfully executed across with our CoRe banking activities and Fintech platform, achieving solid performance on our key metrics, including growth in loans, deposits, noninterest income while also reducing expenses.
As this is our first ever earnings call, I'll provide a brief overview of our business model and our value proposition. As you can see on Slide 3, MVB is a Fintech-enabled bank, combining traditional banking foundation with scaled Fintech capabilities in payments, banking-as-a-service and digital gaming. Today, we operate with approximately $3.3 billion in assets, $2.9 billion in deposits and payment platform processing approximately $48 billion annually. Our dual engine business model produces diversified revenue streams, including net interest income and growing base of fee-driven revenue.
Our differentiation lies in the complementary nature of our business segments. We generate deposits on a national basis through our Fintech-related activities while maintaining a strong core regional banking franchise. This combination allows us to support both traditional lending activities as well as Fintech sponsorship lending and a growing set of payments and Fintech-driven revenue streams within a single platform.
Our business operates across 4 complementary lanes as outlined on Slide 5 of the presentation. First, in our CoRe banking platform, which is our legacy bank that operates branch-light and is increasingly technology-enabled, supporting lending and deposit activities across our regional markets, primarily in commercial real estate, C&I and specialty lending. This is also the backbone of our Fintech platform that provides risk and compliance capabilities and capital to fuel growth.
Second, we serve as a banking partner to Fintech companies across payments, banking-as-a-service and gaming, serving over 40 gaming clients. We work with Fortune 100 and 500 companies in the space, including Fiserv, Worldpay, Intuit-Credit Karma, Global Payments, FanDuel, DraftKings and BetMGM to mention a few.
Third, we are builders of Fintech solutions, where we develop technology capabilities internally as demonstrated with Victor Technology, a payments platform, which we incubated and successfully sold last year for a gain of $34 million.
And fourth, we invest in Fintech businesses that align with our vision, similar to the investment gains we recorded subsequent to quarter end that I will touch on in a minute.
Turning to the quarter's performance by segment. Our CoRe banking business continued its growth trajectory with loans up 2.6% or 10% on an annualized basis from the prior quarter, marking the fourth consecutive quarter of expansion. The growth reflects increased demand as well as improving market conditions. Our deposit base remains a key strength. Noninterest-bearing deposits represented 35% of total deposits at quarter end, supporting our low 2.17% cost of funds and strong 3.71% net interest margin.
In our Fintech platform, we continue to see solid progress across several fronts. Payment card and service charge income increased 13.5% sequentially, benefiting from seasonal factors and partner activity.
As outlined in Slide 10, we launched 2 new Fintech partners during the first quarter, and we continue to see a strong pipeline of Fintech partnership opportunities across multiple stages.
Another highlight of the quarter was our enhanced operational efficiency. Noninterest expense was down 2% year-over-year, while revenues were up 8.8%, delivering positive operating leverage. This positive operating leverage is the result of our ongoing efforts to streamline operations through strategic investments. A key component of that effort has been our investment in automation, data infrastructure and artificial intelligence capabilities.
As outlined in Slide 11, we have built a data and AI infrastructure that supports automation across risk, compliance and operational workflows.
As shown on Slide 12, we're beginning to see the benefit of those investments in our financial results. Over the past several quarters, we've reduced the number of personnel supporting risk and compliance functions from approximately 160 at the peak in the second quarter of 2024 to 111 during the fourth quarter of 2025 with further reductions underway. Importantly, those changes reflect increased efficiency through automation and process improvement while maintaining the strength of our risk and compliance framework.
At the same time, we are continuing to invest in our business to support long-term growth, particularly through our technology and Fintech-related initiatives. During the quarter, we aligned our technology and operations functions under unified leadership with Michael Giorgio now serving as both Chief Information Officer and Chief Operating Officer. This reflects how closely integrated these areas have become within the organization.
In addition, we strengthened our Board with the addition of Adam Famularo, whose deep experience in Fintech and artificial intelligence align well with the capabilities we are continuing to build.
Finally, subsequent to quarter end, we recognized a pretax gain of approximately $10 million related to an existing Fintech investment that will be reported in the second quarter, validating our history of both building and investing in Fintech businesses, including the monetization of our Victor investment last year.
Over the past several years, MVB has evolved from a small community bank to a leading national Fintech banking platform with a diversified business model.
Our balance sheet has grown at a compounded annual growth rate of 10% over the past 9 years from $1.5 billion to $3.3 billion in assets.
We also successfully overcame a challenging regulatory environment and built a resilient and dynamic business that is well positioned to outperform through the cycle.
Looking forward, we are excited about the growth opportunities ahead of us, and we're well positioned for continued profitable growth.
Our first quarter results demonstrated strong execution across our platforms with 45% earnings growth year-over-year, continued loan growth, margin expansion and improved efficiency.
Our Fintech platform is gaining traction with our new partner launches and a robust pipeline. Combined with operational efficiency gains, expanding Fintech partnerships and loan growth, we expect continued momentum in profitability and shareholder value creation.
With that, I'll turn the call over to Michael Sumbs to walk through the financial results for the quarter in more detail.
Thanks, Larry, and good afternoon, everyone. I'll provide a few additional details to help frame the quarter and some of the underlying drivers in the results.
We delivered solid first quarter results with net income of $5.2 million, up 25% year-over-year and diluted earnings per share of $0.39, up 44% year-over-year. This performance was driven by strong revenue growth with net interest income and noninterest income, both up 7% and 17% year-over-year, respectively, while managing costs efficiently with noninterest expense down 2% year-over-year.
Net interest margin for the quarter was 3.71%, up 8 basis points over the prior year period, primarily driven by favorable changes in the balance sheet mix, partially offset by lower earning asset yields.
In addition, we executed on balance sheet optimization actions, including the repayment of $40 million of higher cost subordinated debt. This is expected to reduce funding costs and enhance net interest income with estimated annual savings of approximately $1.8 million starting in the second quarter of 2026.
Noninterest income for the quarter was $8.2 million, up 17% over the prior year period, reflecting higher payment card volume and service charge income. While we continue to see robust growth opportunities in our payments-related business, fee revenue from new partners can be impacted by seasonal patterns and typically builds over time as partners onboard and scale. In addition, the conversion of the pipeline opportunities into revenue can vary from quarter-to-quarter, which may result in some variability in the near term.
Noninterest expense of $28.1 million for the quarter was down 2% over the prior year period and down 11% sequentially, resulting in improved efficiency. While we expect continued efficiency gains from streamlined operations, we expect these savings to be offset by ongoing investments in technology and platform capabilities that position MVB for long-term growth.
Turning to credit, Slide 24. Asset quality remained broadly stable during the quarter with net charge-offs and provision both down sequentially. Nonperforming assets increased slightly from the prior quarter, primarily driven by a small number of commercial and single-family residential loans. The increase in nonperforming loans does not reflect any material industry concentrations, and we believe the exposures are well secured. Approximately 1/3 of total nonperforming assets as of the first -- end of the first quarter or approximately $12.2 million relates to a single credit that we have discussed previously, which we expect to resolve over time with no loss. Overall, we view the underlying credit profile of the portfolio is stable.
Turning to the balance sheet. Total loans reached $2.4 billion, up 10% on an annualized basis from the prior quarter. It is worth noting that a significant portion of the growth occurred for the end of the quarter, primarily in March. As a result, we recognized the associated provision for that growth during the quarter, while the full benefit to net interest income was not reflected in the first quarter results. Loan pipelines also remain strong heading into the second quarter.
Tangible book value per share for the quarter was $25.98, down slightly sequentially, primarily driven by an increase in unrealized losses in our securities portfolio and a higher share count as a result of option exercises in the quarter. As Larry mentioned, subsequent to quarter end, we recognized a pretax gain of approximately $10 million related to a Fintech investment, which is expected to increase tangible book value per share by approximately $0.59.
Moving to capital and liquidity, as shown on Slide 14. We continue to maintain a strong position with capital ratios well above regulatory requirements, offering support for growth and flexibility in capital allocation.
Additionally, as shown on Slide 16, we continue to return capital to shareholders through dividends and share buybacks. Since the first quarter of last year, we have repurchased $10 million worth of shares or approximately 4% of the outstanding shares, and we announced a new $10 million share repurchase program in October of 2025. We will remain disciplined and opportunistic in deploying capital to generate the highest value for our shareholders.
In summary, our quarter results demonstrated solid momentum and execution across our business and MVB is well positioned for continued strong growth.
With that, operator, we're ready to take questions.
[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Catherine Mealor with KBW.
2. Question Answer
[Technical Difficulty]
Yes. Loud and clear, Catherine. Welcome and thank you for joining...
So my first question is just on deposits. I know you've got some seasonality to your deposit flows for some of your Fintech and BaaS businesses. I wanted to see if you could talk a little bit about that and give us some insight into how you're thinking about that going into the second quarter. And then maybe tying that conversation with your expectations for deposit costs. I know you've mentioned in your slide that you've got some big CD maturities coming in the next couple of quarters. And so just curious how you think that could impact your deposit costs and maybe your overall margin.
Thank you, Catherine. I'm going to let Michael take that question.
Catherine, thanks for the question. So I'll explain a little bit about the seasonality that we experienced and you alluded to. So there's really 2 seasons for MVB. The first season relates to our gaming business, and we see the balances in that portfolio swell in the fourth quarter with NFL season and then persist into the first half of the first quarter with the Super Bowl and March Madness and then decline towards the end of the first quarter and trail off over the summer months.
The second season is related to our banking-as-a-service business and specifically the relationship we have with Credit Karma. We see an uptick in deposits in the first quarter related to tax season. And so over the course of the first quarter, the average balance of deposits was up, reflecting that seasonal strength in our banking-as-a-service relationship. Overall, our deposits were up about $60 million point-to-point in the quarter, and that's with running off about $90 million of CDs and a lot of that CD maturity and repricing and runoff happened in March. So we grew deposits by about $60 million net of those CD runoff that we had.
So overall, heading into the second quarter, I think a lot of the seasonality is behind us and reflected in the period end number in March. We do have a lot of CDs coming up about $117 million in the first quarter. And so we'll look to run off and reprice that down which should help support reducing the cost of funds and continuing to grow the margin.
Okay. Great. And then maybe if you could provide just an outlook on your fee income businesses. I know that you've got some new partnerships that are coming on, and it takes a while for you to see the revenue coming through. But maybe you can give us an insight into maybe a growth rate or how you're thinking that kind of payments and service charge line income should trend over the next -- through the back half of this year?
Michael?
Yes. So we've been actively launching new partners. As Larry mentioned, we launched 2 new partners in the first quarter and then a few new partners in the back half of last year. So you'll see that continue to provide both deposits and fee income as we move through '26.
The timing of the ramp for those partners can be choppy and hard to predict. But you should see incremental improvement in growth in the payment card and service charge income line item, and it was up year-over-year slightly. So you'll continue to see that growth as we expand the customers or the clients that we've onboarded and onboard new clients throughout the course of '26.
Okay. Great. And then maybe my last question, if I may, is just big picture profitability outlook. You've made some great progress in improving your ROA this quarter. Any kind of near-term targets or how you kind of think about the path for your ROA and ROE as we move through the year?
Michael, do you want to go ahead and take that?
Yes. Certainly focused on continuing to grow core earnings. That's the North Star of the business and what we're focused on. And I think you can see in the first quarter, we made substantial progress in improving the core profitability of the bank, and we'll continue to do so over the course of the year, both through growing net interest income, driven by loan growth. And as I mentioned, improvement on the cost of deposits as well as the benefit of the Fintech partners that we've launched in the fee income side. So that's really the path we're on, Catherine, continuing to grow core earnings and driving up the ROA and ROE.
I think we started off the year really, really strong in the first quarter. I think it was a continuation of the first quarter -- or the fourth quarter of 2025. I would call it the trend is our friend right now, and we're looking for a very strong 2026.
Core -- even though -- yes, we announced the subsequent event in the second quarter to be reported. The second quarter is going to be strong based on that as well as core earnings growth.
[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from the line of Janet Lee with TD Cowen.
I have a question about the digital worker growth. Obviously, you're increasing the number of digital workers from 10 to 26 by the end of this year. I would imagine the cost of adding a new digital worker could be diminishing or gets lower over time. I know you said you'll be reinvesting some of those efficiency gains. But as we move through the year towards 2027, do you think there is room for your efficiency ratio to improve just on the expense side? Or how should we think about that overall in terms of where expenses are headed with your AI initiatives?
Janet, this is Larry. Thank you for the question. This is one of our favorite questions is our foray into AI. So with our digis, by year-end, we'll actually end up with 32 digis. We have 6 on board now with several that are coming on board, plus the 26. That's -- the total is 26 that we're building throughout 2026. There's a lot of 26s here and then the additional 6 that are already on board. So we'll have a total of 32 digis by the end of this year.
You're exactly right on cost. The first 6 digis were I wouldn't call them extremely expensive, but they were costly in a way to get them up and going in our learning experience. The new digis will be about 1/3 of the cost of the first 6. So that is a big savings there.
What has happened, our first 6 digis were really focused on risk and compliance. That was an area that had a large population of what we call outsourced employees. We used Dominion RightSource. We used AML companies, et cetera, to help us, especially with our seasonality.
As Michael said, there's 2 seasons for MVB, football season and tax season, and we have to bring in extra workers. The digis have now taken care of the extra workers in that a human can process anywhere between 10 and 30 transactions. Our new digi named Evelyn can do 1 million transactions a day. So she gives us a ton of scalability in what we call our operational leverage. And so that will be very cost efficient.
We show in our -- one of our last pages on the deck, the numbers. We were -- we peaked at 160 people at one point in risk and compliance. In the fourth quarter, we ended with 111. We had some seasonality in the first quarter, but that will drop immediately in the second quarter down and eventually, we will get that closer to 90 people -- from 160 down to 90 based on these digital workers.
So again, that first focus was on risk and compliance. The second focus where these next 26 digis were going. The first 26 went to risk and compliance. The second 26 are going throughout the bank. And when I mean throughout the bank, we have digis in accounting. They're helping with reconciliations and other accounting functions. We have digis helping in our loan processing. For example, one digi has taken off 5 hours of loan input per loan. So that was an amazing growth there. And digis even to the teller line that are helping us with balancing, et cetera.
We don't see -- so I think it makes it clear to our team even though we had that large reduction in force from 160 down to 111, eventually down to 90, we don't see us reduce -- having a giant reduction in force. We will have humans in the loop with all our AI digis and working teams.
But additionally, what we see us being able to do is having our teams stay stable. So we have approximately a little over 400 people today. We hope to stay stable with that 400 people, but grow what I'd call pretty strong growth dramatically over the next several years and keeping that team pretty flat. That's our goal of AI and where we're going with this. The team will stay stable, but you'll see good growth. So the revenue per employee per our teammate will continue to grow, and that will be a measure that we look closely to.
For loan growth, in terms of your loan growth outlook for the rest of 2026, do you think this double-digit pace of loan growth is sustainable? And also on the deposit side, if you consider the seasonality factor in the second quarter, should we expect the deposit growth overall in 2026 to be comparable to your loan growth expectations?
Yes, Janet. We have strong pipelines on both deposits and loans. Our loan team has been working extremely hard. They will have a very good first half of the year. That momentum that we had in the first quarter will continue into the second quarter, a very positive loan growth there. And we expect -- as long as there's no geopolitical activities that would stall this, we would expect loan growth to be very positive.
On the deposit side, we see both on our -- what we call our CoRe, our legacy side as well as our Fintech side, very strong pipelines as well. So we see good deposit growth to pace well with the loan growth. And we're excited about both of those sides, the Fintech side and the CoRe side.
Got it. And the last one for me. I believe there are some -- a lot of volatilities within certain fee income line items. Was the equity method investment income for the quarter and card acquiring income, are they just -- is it seasonality that was impacting the first quarter? Or how should we think about the trajectory of those line items over the near term?
Janet, thanks for the question. I'm going to let Michael take that one.
Yes. The equity method investment is related to the 2 mortgage companies that we hold a minority interest position in, Janet. So that's really tied to -- you could think about that as being tied more towards the mortgage market.
And then the card acquiring income, there is some seasonality strength in that line item with some of our gaming partners. But that's a line item that we continue to onboard new clients in, which should support continued growth in that line item.
And we have reached the end of the question-and-answer session. Therefore, I'd like to turn the floor back over to CEO, Larry Mazza, for closing remarks.
Thank you. Thank you again to everybody for your time today and your continued interest in MVB Financial. Our entire team is energized by the opportunities ahead of us, and we're excited to continue to move forward with our -- growing our Fintech platform while strengthening our core banking foundation.
We appreciate your support and look forward to updating you on our progress in the quarters to come. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact our Investor Relations with anything that we can help with. Thank you, and hope you have a nice evening. Good night.
Thank you. And this concludes today's conference, and you may disconnect your lines at this time. We thank you for your participation.
MVB Financial Corp. — Q1 2026 Earnings Call
Financial data from MVB Financial Corp.
Revenue
Revenue is the sum of all sales generated by a company, e.g. for its products or services.
Revenue (TTM) metric explainedDirect Costs
Direct costs are the costs incurred directly in connection with the manufacture of the product or service.
Gross Profit
Gross Profit indicates how much of the revenue remains in the company after deducting direct production costs. If the percentage share of sales is calculated, this is referred to as the gross margin.
Gross Profit metric explainedSelling and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) include all expenses for marketing and sales as well as the general administration of the company.
Research and Development Expense
Research and development costs (R&D) provide information on how much the company invests in the research and development of its products. The costs are particularly interesting as a percentage of revenue and in comparison to direct competitors.
EBITDA
EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization) is the company's earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. The EBITDA margin is calculated as a percentage of sales.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation represents reductions in the value of the company's assets (e.g. due to wear and tear on machinery).
EBIT (Operating Income)
EBIT (Earnings Before Interest and Taxes) is the company's profit before interest and taxes, also known as the operating income. The EBIT Margin is calculated as a percentage of sales at
.
Net Profit
Net Profit represents the profit or loss after deduction of all costs.
Net Profit metric explainedStocksGuide Premium
| Jun '26 |
+/-
%
|
||
| Revenue | 188 188 |
28%
28%
100%
|
|
| - Interest Income | 116 116 |
11%
11%
62%
|
|
| - Non-Interest Income | 72 72 |
69%
69%
38%
|
|
| Interest Expense | 67 67 |
6%
6%
36%
|
|
| Non-Interest Expense | -123 -123 |
2%
2%
-66%
|
|
| Loan Loss Provisions | 13 13 |
279%
279%
7%
|
|
| Net Profit | 39 39 |
127%
127%
21%
|
|
In millions USD.
Don't miss a Thing! We will send you all news about MVB Financial Corp. directly to your mailbox free of charge.
If you wish, we will send you an e-mail every morning with news on stocks of your portfolios.
MVB Financial Corp. Stock News
Company Profile
MVB Financial Corp. is a holding company, which through its subsidiary, engages in the provision of community and mortgage banking services. It also offers commercial and consumer loans, offering an array of loan products for commercial development and real estate, capital needs, as well as personal loans, residential real estate loans, home equity lines of credit, and construction mortgages. The company was founded in 1997 and is headquartered in Fairmont, WV.
StocksGuide Premium
| Head office | United States |
| CEO | Mr. Mazza |
| Employees | 403 |
| Founded | 1999 |
| Website | ir.mvbbanking.com |


