ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. Stock price
Is ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. a Top Scorer Stock based on the Dividend, High-Growth-Investing or Leverman Strategy?
As a Free StocksGuide user, you can view scores for all 9,120 stocks worldwide.
StocksGuide Premium
StocksGuide Unlimited
Key metrics
📘 Market Capitalization
📈 What is it?
Market capitalization shows how much a company is currently worth on the stock market.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It helps classify companies by size (Large, Mid, Small Cap) and indicates their market presence and relative stability.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Large-cap companies tend to be more stable, often pay dividends, but may grow more slowly.
- Smaller firms may offer higher growth potential but come with more volatility.
- Market capitalization is a useful indicator of company size — but not a measure of whether a stock is undervalued or overvalued.
📘 Enterprise Value (EV)
📈 What is it?
Enterprise Value represents the total cost to acquire a company — including its debt and excluding its cash reserves.
🧮 How is it calculated?
(= Market Cap + Net Debt)
🏛️ Why is it important?
EV gives a more complete picture of a company's value than market cap alone and is used in key valuation ratios like EV/FCF or EV/Sales.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Enterprise Value shows the true cost of buying a company, including all financial obligations.
- It is more accurate than just looking at market cap, especially when comparing companies with different levels of debt or cash.
- Professional investors prefer EV-based multiples because they better reflect the company’s full financial footprint.
📘 Net Debt
📈 What is it?
Net Debt shows how much debt remains after subtracting a company’s available cash reserves.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It indicates how dependent a company is on borrowed money and how easily it can service its debt in the short term.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Low or negative net debt signals financial strength and flexibility.
- Companies with strong cash positions are better positioned in crises.
- High net debt increases financial risk — especially in environments with rising interest rates or economic downturns.
📘 Cash
📈 What is it?
Cash represents all liquid assets a company can access immediately — including cash, bank deposits, and short-term investments.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It reflects a company’s financial flexibility and resilience — enabling investments, buybacks, or buffer in downturns.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A strong cash position means greater room for maneuver and crisis resistance.
- Cash-rich companies can invest, pay down debt, or repurchase shares.
- But excess idle cash might indicate a lack of growth opportunities.
📘 Shares Outstanding
📈 What is it?
Shares outstanding represent the total number of a company’s shares currently held by investors — excluding treasury stock.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It’s the basis for key metrics like Earnings Per Share (EPS), Market Capitalization, or the Price/Earnings ratio (P/E).
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Fewer shares in circulation typically increase earnings per share — making each share more valuable.
- Share buybacks reduce the number of shares and boost per-share metrics.
- Issuing new shares does the opposite — diluting shareholder value and lowering per-share figures.
📘 Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E)
📈 What is it?
The P/E ratio shows how many times a company's earnings per share are reflected in its current share price — in other words, how "expensive" the stock appears relative to its profits.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
The P/E ratio is one of the most widely used valuation metrics. It helps investors assess whether a stock appears cheap or expensive compared to its earnings power.
🧮 Calculation
📊 P/E (TTM) = Based on earnings from the last 12 months (Trailing Twelve Months):🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low P/E may indicate undervaluation — or signal underlying issues.
- A high P/E may reflect strong growth expectations — or an overvalued stock.
📘 Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S)
📈 What is it?
The P/S ratio shows how much investors are paying for $1 of the company’s revenue – regardless of profitability.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
P/S is especially useful for evaluating growth companies or businesses not yet profitable. It reflects how the market values the company’s sales.
🧮 Calculation
Market Cap = $48.80m | Revenue (TTM) = $800.51m
Market Cap = $48.80m | Estimated Revenue = $826.75m
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low P/S may indicate undervaluation — or low profitability.
- A high P/S can reflect strong growth expectations — or excessive optimism.
- Especially helpful when evaluating companies where profits are low, volatile, or negative.
📘 Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales)
📈 What is it?
EV/Sales shows how much investors are paying for $1 of revenue — considering not just equity, but also debt and cash. It’s the capital structure–adjusted version of the P/S ratio.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It’s ideal for comparing companies with different levels of debt. It reflects a company's true cost relative to its revenue.
🧮 Calculation
Enterprise Value = $381.40m | Revenue (TTM) = $800.51m
Enterprise Value = $381.40m | Forward Revenue = $826.75m
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- EV/Sales allows for capital structure–neutral company comparisons.
- A lower ratio may indicate undervaluation; a higher one may signal strong growth expectations or overvaluation.
- Especially helpful when evaluating high-growth companies with low or negative earnings.
📘 Enterprise Value to Free Cash Flow (EV/FCF) | ex SBC
📈 What is it?
EV/FCF compares a company’s enterprise value with its free cash flow. The metric therefore shows the multiple of current free cash flow at which a company is valued. EV/FCF ex SBC additionally accounts for stock-based compensation (SBC). While SBC does not represent a direct cash outflow, issuing shares as compensation can dilute existing shareholders. Therefore, SBC is deducted from free cash flow in this adjusted version.
🧮 How is it calculated?
EV/FCF ex SBC = Enterprise Value ÷ (Free Cash Flow (TTM) − SBC)
🏛️ Why is it important?
EV/FCF provides a valuation based on free cash flow and therefore complements earnings-based valuation metrics such as the P/E ratio. The ex SBC version additionally accounts for the economic impact of stock-based compensation and provides a more conservative view from a shareholder perspective.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low EV/FCF means that enterprise value is low relative to current free cash flow. The reasons should always be considered in the context of the company and its industry.
- A high EV/FCF means that enterprise value is high relative to current free cash flow. This can, for example, reflect high growth expectations or temporarily weak cash generation.
- When SBC is positive and adjusted free cash flow remains positive, EV/FCF ex SBC is generally higher than the standard EV/FCF.
- The metric is particularly useful for companies with relatively stable and predictable cash flows.
- If free cash flow is negative or very low, EV/FCF has limited usefulness and should not be interpreted like a standard valuation multiple.
📘 Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B)
📈 What is it?
The P/B ratio compares a company’s market value to its book value — showing how much investors are paying for each dollar of net assets.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
P/B is commonly used for asset-heavy industries like banks or industrials. It helps assess whether a stock is trading above or below its net asset value.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A P/B below 1 may signal undervaluation — or weak profitability.
- A P/B above 1 implies the market expects future value creation (e.g., brand, IP, growth).
- Best used for companies with tangible assets and strong balance sheets.
📘 Equity Ratio
📈 What is it?
The equity ratio indicates what portion of a company’s total assets is financed by shareholders’ equity – in other words, how much it relies on its own capital.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
A high equity ratio reflects financial strength and stability, especially during downturns. It’s a key indicator of a company’s solvency and long-term risk profile.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Companies with high equity ratios are generally more resilient and less dependent on external debt.
- Low equity ratios can signal higher risk or aggressive financial strategies.
- Important: Always assess the equity ratio in combination with the return on equity (ROE). This shows not just how stable the company is – but also how efficiently it uses shareholder capital.
📘 Return on Equity (ROE)
📈 What is it?
Return on equity (ROE) shows how efficiently a company uses its shareholders’ equity to generate profit. In other words: how much net income is earned per dollar of equity.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
ROE is a core profitability metric. It helps investors understand whether a company delivers attractive returns on the capital provided by its shareholders.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high ROE indicates that the company is using its capital efficiently and profitably.
- It’s especially meaningful for capital-intensive businesses or firms with high equity bases.
- Important: A very high ROE can also result from high debt levels – always interpret it alongside the equity ratio to assess financial health.
📘 Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
📈 What is it?
ROCE measures how efficiently a company generates profits from its total capital – including both equity and interest-bearing debt.
🧮 How is it calculated?
It evaluates the return on all capital employed, regardless of how it’s financed.
🏛️ Why is it important?
ROCE is ideal for comparing companies with different financing structures. It shows how well management uses capital to create value for both shareholders and creditors.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high ROCE means the company uses its capital efficiently – regardless of whether it's funded by debt or equity.
- The higher the ROCE compared to peers, the more value the company creates with its invested capital.
- Especially relevant for capital-intensive sectors like industrials, energy, or infrastructure.
📘 Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
📈 What is it?
ROIC measures how efficiently a company generates returns from the capital invested in its core operations – regardless of whether the capital comes from equity or debt.
🧮 How is it calculated?
- NOPAT = Net Operating Profit After Taxes
- Invested Capital = Operating assets minus non-interest-bearing liabilities
🏛️ Why is it important?
ROIC is one of the most accurate indicators of capital efficiency. Unlike return on equity, it is not distorted by leverage and shows how much value is created for all capital providers.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high ROIC shows how effectively a company uses the capital that is truly invested in its core operations.
- Unlike ROCE, ROIC focuses only on the capital that is actively used to run the business – and that requires a return (i.e. interest-bearing).
- Especially useful when comparing companies with large amounts of excess cash or non-interest-bearing liabilities – giving a more realistic picture of capital efficiency.
📘 Leverage Ratio (Debt-to-Equity)
📈 What is it?
The leverage ratio indicates how much a company relies on interest-bearing debt (such as loans and bonds) relative to its shareholders’ equity.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
This ratio helps assess a company’s financial structure and risk profile. High leverage can enhance returns – but also increases exposure to interest rate changes and financial stress.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low leverage ratio signals financial strength and independence.
- A higher ratio can improve returns in good times but increases risk during downturns or rising interest rate periods.
- 👉 Always interpret in the context of industry, capital intensity, and interest rate environment.
📘 SBC | in % Revenue
📈 What is it?
SBC (Stock-Based Compensation) refers to equity-based compensation granted by a company to its employees and executives. The percentage shows SBC relative to revenue.
🧮 How is it calculated?
SBC as % of Revenue = (SBC ÷ Revenue) × 100
🏛️ Why is it important?
Stock-based compensation is a real cost factor for shareholders. It can increase the number of shares outstanding and therefore dilute existing shareholders. The percentage of revenue shows how heavily a company relies on equity-based compensation and how significant this form of compensation is relative to the size of the business.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A lower figure is generally positive: Stock-based compensation is relatively small compared with the company's revenue.
- A high figure can indicate greater reliance on stock-based compensation and a higher potential risk of dilution. However, it is also important to consider whether the company offsets dilution through share buybacks.
- The trend over time should also be considered. A high but declining percentage presents a different picture from a persistently high or increasing percentage.
- A single-digit SBC-to-revenue ratio is not unusual among many growth-oriented and technology companies.
📘 SBC as % of FCF
📈 What is it?
SBC (Stock-Based Compensation) refers to equity-based compensation granted by a company to its employees and executives. The percentage shows SBC relative to free cash flow (FCF).
🧮 How is it calculated?
SBC as % of FCF = (SBC ÷ Free Cash Flow) × 100
🏛️ Why is it important?
Stock-based compensation is a real cost factor for shareholders. It can increase the number of shares outstanding and therefore dilute existing shareholders. The percentage of free cash flow shows how significant SBC is relative to the cash generated by the company. Since SBC is non-cash compensation, it is typically not deducted as a cash outflow when calculating FCF.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A lower value is generally favorable. Stock-based compensation is relatively small compared with the company's cash generation.
- A high value means that SBC represents a significant portion of the company's reported free cash flow, even though SBC itself is non-cash.
- The higher the value, the more significant SBC can be as an economic cost to shareholders, particularly when it results in share dilution.
📘 SBC Growth 1Y
📈 What is it?
SBC Growth 1Y shows how much a company's stock-based compensation has changed compared to the previous year.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
SBC Growth shows whether stock-based compensation is becoming more or less significant for shareholders. If SBC increases significantly, it can lead to greater shareholder dilution over time. At the same time, SBC is a non-cash expense that reduces earnings on the income statement but is added back in the cash flow statement.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high positive value is generally negative, as rising SBC can increase the burden on shareholders, particularly through potential dilution.
- What matters is whether the development of SBC is sustainable over the long term. Some level of SBC is common among many growth and technology companies.
📘 Share Count Growth 1Y
📈 What is it?
Share Count Growth 1Y shows how much the number of shares outstanding has increased or decreased over a one-year period.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
The number of shares determines how many shares the company's earnings and assets are distributed across. If the share count decreases, existing shareholders' relative ownership increases. If it increases, existing shareholders are diluted. The metric therefore makes dilution and share buybacks directly visible.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A negative value is generally positive, as the number of shares outstanding is decreasing.
- A positive value indicates dilution of existing shareholders.
- A declining share count is not automatically positive: It also matters at what price the shares are repurchased and how the buybacks are financed.
📘 Shareholder Yield
📈 What is it?
Shareholder Yield measures how much capital a company returns to shareholders or uses to reduce debt relative to its market capitalization. It goes beyond dividend yield by also including share buybacks and debt reduction.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Dividend yield only tells part of the story. Companies can also return capital through share buybacks, while reducing debt can strengthen the balance sheet. Shareholder Yield combines all three components into one metric, giving investors a broader view of how a company uses its capital.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A higher Shareholder Yield generally indicates more capital being returned to shareholders or used to reduce debt.
- The mix matters: dividends, buybacks, and debt reduction can affect shareholders in different ways.
- Share buybacks are most beneficial when shares are repurchased at attractive valuations.
- Investors should also consider whether dividends, buybacks, and debt reduction are sustainable over time.
📘 Revenue
📈 What is it?
Revenue shows how much a company earns in total from selling its products and services – the gross income before any costs are deducted.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Revenue is one of the key figures to assess a company’s size, market position, and growth potential.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Growing revenue indicates rising demand and can be an early signal of future earnings growth.
- Comparing actual and expected revenue reveals trends in the market environment and analyst sentiment.
- Note: Strong revenue alone isn’t enough – margins and profitability matter just as much.
📘 EBITDA
📈 What is it?
EBITDA stands for “Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization.” It reflects a company’s operating profit before the effects of financing, taxes, and accounting depreciation.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
EBITDA is widely used to evaluate a company’s operating performance – especially across capital-intensive sectors or international comparisons.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high or growing EBITDA indicates strong operational profitability – independent of taxes, interest, or accounting methods.
- It’s especially useful for comparing companies across sectors or geographies.
- Important: EBITDA is not a net income figure – it excludes key costs like depreciation and interest.
📘 EBIT
📈 What is it?
EBIT stands for “Earnings Before Interest and Taxes.” It reflects a company’s operating profit after depreciation, but before interest and tax expenses.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
EBIT is a core profitability metric that shows how well the company performs in its main business operations – independent of capital structure and tax environment.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high EBIT indicates strong profitability from the company’s core business – before financial and tax effects.
- It allows better comparison between companies with different debt levels or tax structures.
- Compared to EBITDA, EBIT already accounts for depreciation and reflects capital intensity more clearly.
📘 Net Income
📈 What is it?
Net income is the company’s total profit – the amount left after all expenses, taxes, interest, and depreciation have been deducted.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Net income is the most comprehensive measure of a company’s profitability – showing how much actual profit remains after all business and financing costs.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Growing net income indicates that the company is managing all of its costs efficiently.
- It directly influences valuation metrics like P/E ratio and the company’s dividend capacity.
- Over time, net income trends reveal how resilient and profitable the business model really is.
📘 Free Cash Flow (FCF) | ex SBC
📈 What is it?
Free cash flow shows how much cash remains after a company has covered its operating and capital expenditures. FCF ex SBC additionally deducts stock-based compensation (SBC) to adjust the cash flow for the effect of non-cash SBC.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Free Cash Flow ex SBC = Operating Cash Flow − SBC − Capital Expenditures (CAPEX)
🏛️ Why is it important?
FCF reflects a company’s actual financial strength – independent of reported accounting earnings. It shows how much flexibility a company has for dividends, share buybacks, or debt reduction. FCF ex SBC also deducts stock-based compensation and shows how much cash generation remains after SBC.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- High free cash flow indicates that a company has strong financial strength – independent of reported earnings.
- It is often a solid basis for sustainable dividends and share buybacks.
- Declining FCF can be a warning sign, even if reported earnings remain stable.
📘 Revenue Growth
📈 What is it?
Revenue growth shows how much a company’s sales have changed compared to the previous year – both on a trailing basis (TTM) and based on forward projections.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Forward = (Expected revenue ÷ Revenue in prior year − 1) × 100
Forward growth is based on analyst estimates for the current fiscal year.
🏛️ Why is it important?
Rising revenue signals growing demand, business expansion, and market share gains – especially important for growth-oriented companies.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Growth is the engine of long-term value creation – especially in tech and growth sectors.
- What matters is not just current growth, but its sustainability.
- Forward projections reflect whether analysts expect continued momentum – or a slowdown.
📘 EBITDA Growth
📈 What is it?
EBITDA growth shows how much a company’s operating profit (before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) has increased or decreased compared to the previous year.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Forward = (Expected EBITDA ÷ EBITDA from prior year − 1) × 100
The forward estimate is based on analyst projections for the current fiscal year.
🏛️ Why is it important?
Growing EBITDA indicates improving operational profitability – regardless of financing or accounting effects.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Strong EBITDA growth signals operational efficiency and scalability – especially during growth phases.
- EBITDA growth can be an early indicator of margin and earnings expansion – but should be assessed alongside revenue and EBIT.
📘 EBIT Growth
📈 What is it?
EBIT growth shows how much a company’s operating profit (after depreciation, but before interest and taxes) has increased compared to the previous year.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Forward = (Expected EBIT ÷ EBIT from prior year − 1) × 100
The forward estimate is based on analyst projections for the current fiscal year.
🏛️ Why is it important?
EBIT growth is a direct indicator of a company’s business performance – taking into account capital intensity through depreciation.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Rising EBIT signals improving operating profitability – even after accounting for depreciation.
- It’s especially important for evaluating companies with significant capital expenditures.
- Combined with revenue and EBITDA growth, EBIT growth provides a well-rounded view of operational progress.
📘 Net Income Growth
📈 What is it?
Net income growth shows how much a company’s bottom-line profit has increased or decreased compared to the previous year – both on a trailing basis (TTM) and based on analyst projections.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Forward = (Expected net income ÷ Net income from prior year − 1) × 100
The forward estimate reflects analysts’ expectations for the current fiscal year.
🏛️ Why is it important?
Net income is the ultimate measure of profitability. Growing net income signals stronger efficiency, cost control, and sustainable earnings power.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Stronger net income boosts valuation, dividend potential, and investor confidence.
- If profits stall while revenue grows, it may signal margin pressure.
📘 Free Cash Flow Growth
📈 What is it?
Free cash flow (FCF) growth shows how a company’s available cash – after covering operating expenses and capital expenditures – has changed compared to the previous year.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Free cash flow reflects real financial strength. Growing FCF indicates more flexibility for dividends, share buybacks, and reinvestment.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Declining FCF may point to rising investments, increasing costs, or weaker operating performance.
- Especially for dividend investors, FCF growth is critical – since dividends are paid from actual available cash.
- A negative trend isn't always bad, but it deserves closer attention.
📘 Gross Margin
📈 What is it?
Gross margin shows how much of a company’s revenue remains after deducting the direct costs of goods sold (like materials and production). It represents the company’s “raw profit” before fixed costs, taxes, and interest.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Or simply: Gross Margin = Gross Profit ÷ Revenue × 100
🏛️ Why is it important?
Gross margin indicates how efficiently a company can produce or procure what it sells. It is a key measure of product-level profitability and pricing power.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high gross margin suggests strong pricing power and efficient production.
- Falling margins may signal rising input costs or competitive pressure.
- Compared to peers, gross margin offers insights into the quality of a business model.
📘 EBITDA Margin
📈 What is it?
The EBITDA margin shows how much of a company’s revenue remains as operating profit before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization.It reflects operating efficiency without being distorted by financing or accounting factors.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
The EBITDA margin reveals how much operating income a company generates per dollar of revenue – independent of capital structure and tax effects.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high EBITDA margin reflects strong core profitability – before accounting distortions.
- It allows for effective comparisons across companies and sectors.
- A stable or growing margin signals efficient cost control and business scalability.
📘 EBIT Margin
📈 What is it?
The EBIT margin shows what percentage of revenue remains as operating profit after depreciation but before interest and taxes.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
The EBIT margin reflects a company’s core profitability while accounting for capital intensity (e.g. machinery, infrastructure). It’s especially useful for comparing businesses with different levels of depreciation.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high EBIT margin shows that the company remains efficient even after factoring in depreciation.
- It’s especially relevant for capital-intensive industries.
- Stable or rising EBIT margins over time are a strong indicator of pricing power and business quality.
📘 Net Margin
📈 What is it?
Net margin shows how much of a company’s revenue remains as bottom-line profit after deducting all costs, interest, taxes, and depreciation.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Net margin reflects a company’s overall efficiency – across operations, financing, and taxation. It shows how much actual profit is generated from each dollar of revenue.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high net margin means the company is not only strong operationally but also manages financing and taxes efficiently.
- Peer comparisons reveal business quality and competitiveness.
- Declining margins despite revenue growth can be a red flag for rising costs or inefficiencies.
📘 Free Cash Flow Margin | ex SBC
📈 What is it?
The Free Cash Flow Margin shows how much free cash flow a company generates relative to its revenue. In simplified terms, free cash flow is calculated as operating cash flow minus capital expenditures. The Free Cash Flow Margin ex SBC additionally accounts for stock-based compensation (SBC). While SBC does not represent a direct cash outflow, issuing shares as compensation can dilute existing shareholders. Therefore, SBC is deducted from free cash flow in this adjusted metric.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Free Cash Flow Margin ex SBC = (Free Cash Flow − SBC) ÷ Revenue × 100
🏛️ Why is it important?
The Free Cash Flow Margin shows how efficiently a company converts its revenue into free cash flow. Strong free cash flow can provide financial flexibility for dividends, share buybacks, debt repayment, or further investments. The ex SBC version additionally accounts for the economic impact of stock-based compensation and therefore provides a more conservative view of cash generation from a shareholder perspective.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high Free Cash Flow Margin shows that a company converts a high proportion of its revenue into free cash flow.
- This can provide greater financial flexibility for dividends, share buybacks, debt repayment, or investments.
- The Free Cash Flow Margin ex SBC additionally accounts for potential shareholder dilution from stock-based compensation.
- The long-term trend is particularly important. Declining margins can, for example, result from higher investments, changes in working capital, or weaker operating performance.
📘 Earnings per share (EPS)
📈 What is it?
Earnings per Share (EPS) shows how much profit is attributable to a single share – and is one of the most important metrics for evaluating a company's performance.
🧮 How is it calculated?
The diluted share count reflects potential new shares that could be issued through options, convertible bonds, or other rights.
🏛️ Why is it important?
EPS is the basis for many key valuation metrics like P/E ratio, PEG ratio, or payout ratio. It enables comparisons of profitability across companies, regardless of their size.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- EPS captures per-share profitability and is especially useful for comparisons over time or with analyst estimates.
- Rising EPS may signal consistent growth or share buybacks.
- Important: Always use diluted EPS for more realistic valuations – especially in companies with stock-based compensation.
📘 Free cash flow per share (FCF per share)
📈 What is it?
Free Cash Flow per Share shows how much free cash flow a company generates per outstanding share – after investments, but before dividends or debt repayments.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Free cash flow is calculated as operating cash flow minus capital expenditures (CapEx).
🏛️ Why is it important?
FCF per Share reveals how much real cash is available per share – useful for dividends, buybacks, or reducing debt. Unlike net income, free cash flow is harder to manipulate and often seen as a more reliable metric.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- High FCF per share signals strong financial flexibility.
- It shows how much capital the company can effectively reinvest or return to shareholders.
- Particularly relevant for dividend payers and capital-efficient businesses.
📘 Short interest
📈 What is it?
Short interest indicates how many shares of a company are currently sold short – that is, borrowed and sold by investors who expect the price to decline.
🧮 How is it calculated?
It reflects the percentage of a company’s shares that are being shorted relative to the total shares available.
🏛️ Why is it important?
Short interest serves as a sentiment indicator: A high value may signal skepticism or bearish expectations – but also increases the potential for a short squeeze if prices rise unexpectedly.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Low short interest usually indicates market confidence in the company.
- High short interest can be a warning sign – or an opportunity if sentiment shifts.
- Especially relevant in volatile markets or ahead of key earnings releases.
📘 Employees
📈 What is it?
The employee count shows how many people a company employs worldwide – offering insights into its size, structure, and business model.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It helps assess operational scale, labor intensity, and cost structure. Combined with revenue and profit, it enables key metrics like revenue per employee or productivity.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high headcount can signal operational complexity – but also significant growth capacity.
- Revenue per employee is a key indicator of efficiency.
- Especially useful for comparing tech, industrial, or service-heavy companies.
📘 Revenue per employee
📈 What is it?
Revenue per employee indicates how much revenue a company generates on average per employee – a key measure of efficiency and productivity.
🧮 How is it calculated?
The employee count is typically taken from the most recent annual report.
🏛️ Why is it important?
This metric helps compare business models – especially between labor-intensive and technology-driven companies. A high value suggests automation, operational efficiency, or strong value creation per head.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high revenue per employee indicates a scalable and margin-strong business model.
- A low figure may reflect labor-intensive operations or lower value-add.
- Especially helpful when comparing tech companies to industrial or service sectors.
ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. Stock Analysis
Analyst Opinions
10 Analysts have issued a ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. forecast:
Analyst Opinions
10 Analysts have issued a ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. forecast:
ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. Events
Past Events
|
AUG
5
Q2 2026 Earnings Call
about 2 months ago
|
|
MAY
6
Q1 2026 Earnings Call
5 months ago
|
|
MAR
13
Q4 2025 Earnings Call
7 months ago
|
|
NOV
6
Q3 2025 Earnings Call
11 months ago
|
StocksGuide Free
ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. — Q2 2026 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Greetings, and welcome to The ONE Group Second Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Nicole Thaung, Chief Financial Officer. Please go ahead.
Thank you, operator, and hello, everyone. Before we begin our formal remarks, let me remind you that part of our discussion today will include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and you should not place undue reliance on them. These statements are also subject to numerous risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from what we expect. Please also note that these forward-looking statements reflect our opinion only as of the date of this call. We undertake no obligation to revise or publicly release any revisions of these forward-looking statements considering new information or future events. We refer you to our recent SEC filings for a more detailed discussion of the risks that could impact our future operating results and financial condition.
During today's call, we will discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures, which we believe can be useful in evaluating our performance. However, the presentation of these measures or other information should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for results prepared in accordance with GAAP. For reconciliations of these measures, such as adjusted EBITDA, restaurant operating profit, comparable sales and total food and beverage sales at company-owned managed, licensed and franchise units to GAAP measures, along with the discussion of why we consider these measures useful, please see our earnings release issued today.
With that, I would like to turn the call over to Manny Hilario.
Thank you, Nicole, and good afternoon, everyone. I appreciate you joining us. I want to start, as I always do, by thanking our team members. Every day, our teams across every brand and market work to create memorable experiences for our guests. Today, consistency is more important than ever, and I want to recognize their drive in providing operational excellence and upholding our commitment to vibe dining that defines who we are.
With that, let me turn to an overview of our quarterly performance, walk through our progress on our strategic priorities and then hand things over to Nicole for a closer look at the financials. We made significant progress in driving market share this quarter with all segments reporting positive transactions for the quarter. We expanded restaurant level margin. We generated $32 million in operating cash flow in the first 6 months of 2026, nearly triple the $11 million we generated over the same period last year. And we reduced year-to-date net capital expenditures by approximately 38% compared to the first half of 2025 and used our improved cash generation to pay down debt.
This is the combination we set out to deliver, stronger returns, more disciplined capital deployment and a cleaner balance sheet. Consolidated restaurant level operating profit margin increased 110 basis points to 16.4% compared to 15.3% a year ago, reflecting the operational discipline we have embedded across the business. The STK segment demonstrated strong margin expansion of 130 basis points, improving to 17.4%. The Benihana segment also demonstrated solid growth, expanding 90 basis points to 18.9% and remains our strongest margin segment.
Turning to revenue. Total revenue was approximately $200 million, down 3.2% from a year ago. This decline was primarily anticipated and driven by our planned optimization of the Grill concepts portfolio. The one variable outside of our plan was the timing of the STK Downtown New York relocation, which was planned for the second quarter, but delayed until July. This was the relocation of our original STK in downtown New York City.
Our comparable sales results are indicative of our core business strength. Consolidated comparable sales grew 0.9% for the quarter, with U.S. STK restaurants delivering 3.2% comparable sales growth and Benihana restaurants growing 0.8%. All segments posted positive transaction growth. Our comparable sales results were modestly affected by World Cup impacts as consumers shifted dining occasions to watch matches, particularly during evening and weekend dayparts when our restaurants are busiest. Benihana was also impacted by elevated temperatures in select markets, which affected traffic during the quarter. These represent temporary headwinds that now have passed and should not persist into the third quarter.
Now let me update you on our 4 strategic priorities. Our first strategic priority is accelerating comparable sales through disciplined execution. The improvement we saw in comparable sales, particularly at STK, reinforces that the strategy is working. We continue to grow our relative market share with positive traffic at all segments. The Barbell strategy that defines our brand continues to deliver strong results. During the week, our value programming leads the way. Our $3, $6, $9 Happy Hour remains one of our most consistent traffic drivers in the early evening and late night, while our Weeknight Date Night initiative is driving incremental traffic during historically slower periods and creating new opportunities across all brands.
On weekends and around celebrations, our premium steak and seafood offerings continue to perform strongly. Guests are being deliberate when they trade up and when they look for value and our model captures both ends of that spectrum. Our balanced approach is working. Mother's Day, Father's Day and graduation season represents distinct moments where guests seek out our restaurants for premium offerings and celebratory atmosphere. All 3 occasions performed strongly across the portfolio. Our Friends with Benefits loyalty program continues to gain momentum. We're adding many new organic members each week and newly enrolled guests show strong repeat participation.
Loyalty members spend meaningfully more per visit than non-loyalty guests. And as the program grows, it represents an increasing share of our overall quarterly transaction. We strategically target our Friends with Benefits members around Mother's Day, Father's Day and graduation season using personalized outreach to drive traffic during these occasions. We remain focused on growing membership, driving organic sign-ups and increasing engagement to strengthen brand connection and repeat visits.
We're also driving growth through seasonal innovation. This quarter, our culinary and beverage teams launched and emphasized premium offerings, including new Wagyu cuts and innovative top-shelf liquor cocktails. We also will be adding new dishes built around fiber and whole grains, including a new quinoa option, which supports the broader wellness and GLP-related dining trends we are seeing among our guests. We launched new food and beverage menus 4 times a year, keeping our offerings fresh and differentiating ourselves from competitors and generating strong social media engagement.
We expanded our off-premises business heading to the summer travel season with a particular focus on curbside operations. Burgers and sides drive strong takeout and delivery volume across all brands and Benihana and RA Sushi's fried rice burritos have performed well in that channel. While off-premises represent a smaller share of our business than dine-in, it delivers a strong margin profile and allows us to capture additional occasions when guests want the brand without committing to a full dine-in experience.
Our second priority is capital-efficient growth. We are making meaningful progress on both our company-owned and franchise expansion initiatives. We opened 2 new company-owned restaurants, STK Downtown Phoenix in June and the relocation of our downtown New York City STK restaurant to Chelsea in July, each at a cost of $1 million or less after TI. In July, we also completed the conversion of our Kona Grill location in Riverton, Utah, into a Benihana restaurant, following the same playbook we used in Scottsdale, Arizona last year.
Our development pipeline remains focused and heavily weighted toward capital efficiency. We plan to open 6 to 10 venues in 2026, prioritizing locations that require $1.5 million or less in net capital investment. And the majority are asset-light, meaning that they require little to no upfront capital or investment from us. Additionally, we are prioritizing our existing lease pipeline over new commitments. That approach is deliberate, giving us the flexibility to navigate an uncertain consumer environment while still investing in the highest return opportunities.
Beyond our core domestic expansion, we're also advancing strategic partnerships. We signed a license agreement to bring RA to Canada at Niagara Falls with an opening expected by year-end. Our regional projects showcase how we're deploying this capital-light strategy across our portfolio. In Baltimore, we're advancing a single project site with 2 brands, an STK and Kona Grill Bistro, a smaller footprint Kona Grill model are both under construction as part of the Kona Grill Baltimore conversion. STK also recently signed a contract for 2 asset-light licensed locations at a major U.S. airport.
Franchise Benihana and Benihana Express is expected to drive the bulk of our near-term openings. I'm particularly excited about the long-term potential for the Benihana Express brand. As we previously reported, we purchased the Miami Benihana Express location from an exiting franchisee and have begun accelerating the growth of the concept. With this model, we can deliver your Benihana fix on the go with cost of goods and labor margin of approximately 20% and 25%, respectively, the 800 to 1,000 square foot box can deliver over 50% prime margin and annual revenues greater than $1 million.
We anticipate the developed cost to be about $500 per square foot, resulting in substantial returns. We believe these economics will make the Benihana Express brand highly marketable to the franchise community and its flexible footprint is easy and replicable in many markets. We currently have a company-owned Benihana Express under construction in Denver and a licensed Benihana Express in the Florida Keys in development, all expected to open by year-end.
With a disciplined pipeline focused on high-return capital-efficient opportunities, we're positioned to drive meaningful growth while maintaining financial flexibility. We remain confident in our ability to execute this strategy and create lasting shareholder value. Our third priority is portfolio optimization to improve returns. As previously discussed, we continue converting certain Grill locations into higher-performing STK and Benihana restaurants.
Through January 2026, we have previously identified and temporarily closed 6 RA and Kona Grill restaurants for conversion. What remains is a healthy, profitable base expected to generate strong revenues and profitability. As of today, we have reopened 2 conversions. Each conversion is budgeted between $1 million and $1.5 million and expected to be EBITDA accretive. Scottsdale, our first conversion, continues to validate the thesis of increased revenues and a healthy ROI. Going forward, we'll continue to assess the portfolio as leases expire, which typically occurs for 1 to 2 Grill locations each year.
Our fourth priority for 2026 is conserving cash and optimizing the balance sheet. And the second quarter shows that discipline is taking hold. We ended the period with $17 million in cash and short-term credit card receivables, $28.7 million of availability under our revolving facility. Our long-term loan facility currently carries no financial covenants. The clearest signal is in our cash generation. Operating cash flow for the first 6 months of 2026 reached $32 million, up from $11 million a year ago. We put that cash to work, repaying over $4 million on the term loan facility and $2 million on the revolving facility. We are generating a significant amount of free cash flow, and we expect to continue to do so in the foreseeable future.
We also continue to evaluate opportunities to refinance our credit facility on more favorable terms as our leverage profile keeps improving. This is a trajectory that we outlined in our last call. We expect to generate free cash flow in 2026 and debt reduction remains a top priority alongside creating shareholder value.
Before I turn it over to Nicole, I want to be clear about one thing. Everything I've outlined today is execution, not hope. These are initiatives within our direct control, and they are delivering measurable results today, not commitments for tomorrow.
With that, I'll turn it over to Nicole.
Thank you, Manny. As a reminder, beginning this year, we're reporting financial information on a fiscal quarter basis using four 13-week quarters with the addition of a 53rd week when necessary. For 2026, our fiscal calendar began on December 29, 2025, and our second quarter contained 91 days, which is consistent with the prior year quarter. Consolidated comparable sales are reported on the same number of days year-over-year.
Let me start by discussing our second quarter financials in greater detail before introducing our third quarter outlook and updating our fiscal year 2026 guidance. Total consolidated GAAP revenues were $200.5 million, decreasing 3.3% from $207.4 million for the same quarter last year. Included in total revenues were our company-owned restaurant net revenues of $197.3 million, which decreased 3.2% from $203.9 million for the prior year quarter. The decrease was primarily attributable to the closed Grill concept restaurants, partially offset by an increase in comparable restaurant sales and sales from new restaurants opened since July 2025. Comparable restaurant sales increased 0.9%, which included positive transaction growth at all segments.
Management license franchise and incentive fee revenues decreased slightly to $3.2 million from $3.5 million in the prior year quarter. The decrease is primarily due to the exit of a management agreement in Scottsdale, Arizona during the second quarter of 2025. As previously noted, the managed location was replaced with the conversion of a former RA to a company-owned STK in the second half of 2025.
Now turning to expenses. We continue to implement targeted cost management initiatives. Last year, we made strategic adjustments to our beef tenderloin sourcing that is still favorably impacting our cost of sales. We drove better labor by improving scheduling management, and we are still realizing the synergies from the Benihana acquisition. Company-owned restaurant cost of sales as a percentage of company-owned restaurant net revenue improved 170 basis points to 19.5% from 21.2%. This improvement was primarily due to integration synergies, supply chain initiatives, menu optimization and increased menu pricing. This is not a 1-quarter story. Cost of sales has now improved for 6 consecutive years from 25.5% in 2021 to 19.5% today.
Company-owned restaurant operating expenses as a percentage of company-owned restaurant net revenue increased 50 basis points to 64% from 63.5%, reflecting incremental marketing investment to drive traffic during the World Cup and additional repair and maintenance spend to expand air conditioning capacities at Benihana during the summer heat waves. Importantly, on a combined basis, including cost of sales, total owned operating expenses improved 110 basis points to 83.6% from 84.7%, meaning the progress we made on cost of sales more than offset these deliberate near-term investments.
Restaurant operating profit was $32.4 million or 16.4% of owned restaurant net revenue, improving by 110 basis points from 15.3% in the prior quarter. On a total reported basis, general and administrative costs increased $2.3 million to $14 million from $11.7 million in the same quarter prior year, driven by inflation on salaries, higher bonus expense, planned investment in information technology, including AI-related technologies and increased travel expenses. We believe that fuel prices have directly impacted our travel costs.
When adjusting for stock-based compensation of $1.1 million, adjusted general and administrative expenses were $12.9 million compared to $10.2 million in the second quarter of 2025. As a percentage of revenues, when adjusting for stock-based compensation, adjusted general and administrative costs were 6.4% compared to 4.9% in the prior year. Our updated full year general and administrative expense guidance of approximately $50 million remains roughly $21 million below where pre-acquisition run rate spending adjusted for inflation would otherwise be today. Depreciation and amortization expense was $11 million compared to $10.9 million in the prior year quarter. This slight increase is attributed to new restaurants opened during the previous 12 months. Lease termination and restaurant closure expenses were $900,000, primarily related to the Grill concept optimization and the relocation of the downtown New York City STK restaurants.
Preopening expenses were $2.9 million, primarily related to payroll, training and other costs for STK Downtown Phoenix, which opened in June; the delay of the STK Chelsea opening, which opened in July; and preopening rent for restaurants under development, including $1.1 million in noncash rent. Preopening expenses increased by $1.3 million compared to the prior year period.
Transition and integration expenses were $200,000, down from $3.9 million in the prior year quarter as we near completion of the integration of the Benihana and RA acquisition. Operating income was $6.6 million compared to operating income of $700,000 in the second quarter of 2025, an increase of $5.9 million, primarily due to improved restaurant operating profit and the reduction in transition and integration costs. For a reconciliation, please refer to our press release issued earlier today.
Interest expense was $9.6 million compared to $10.3 million in the prior year quarter. Our weighted average interest rate was 10.1% compared to 10.8% in the prior year quarter. Benefit for income taxes was $700,000 compared to $700,000 expense in the prior year quarter. Net loss attributable to The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. was $2.1 million compared to a net loss of $10.1 million in the second quarter of 2025. Net loss available to common stockholders was $12 million compared to $18.2 million in the second quarter of 2025.
Adjusted EBITDA attributable to The ONE Group Hospitality was $21.1 million compared to $23.4 million in the prior year quarter, a decrease of 9.7%, primarily due to increased investment in marketing during the quarter and the increase in general and administrative expenses, excluding stock-based compensation, as previously discussed. We finished the quarter with $17.1 million in cash and short-term credit card receivables. We have $28.7 million available under our revolving credit facility, subject to certain conditions. And as Manny said, our term loan does not currently require a financial covenants.
Now I would like to provide some forward-looking commentary regarding our business. This commentary is subject to risks and uncertainties associated with forward-looking statements as discussed in our SEC filings. We remind our investors that the actual number and timing of new restaurant openings for any given period is subject to factors outside the company's control, including macroeconomic conditions, weather and factors under the control of landlords, contractors, licensees, and regulatory and licensing authorities.
Based on the information available now and the expectations as of today, we're issuing the following financial targets for the third quarter of 2026. Please note that due to seasonality, the third quarter historically represents 10% to 15% of the full year contribution. Beginning with the top line, we project total GAAP revenue between $176 million and $180 million, which reflects our anticipation of consolidated comparable sales of 0% to 2%. Managed franchise and license fee revenues are expected to be approximately $3 million, total company-owned operating expenses as a percentage of company-owned restaurant net revenue between 85% and 87%. Total general and administrative expenses, excluding stock-based compensation of approximately $12.5 million; adjusted EBITDA between $12 million and $15 million; and finally, restaurant preopening expenses between $1 million and $2 million.
Based on our year-to-date results, the information available now and our expectations as of today, we're also updating the following financial targets for fiscal year 2026. We project total GAAP revenues between $805 million and $820 million, which reflects our anticipation of consolidated comparable sales of 1% to 2%. Managed franchise and license fee revenues are expected to be approximately $14 million, total company-owned operating expenses as a percentage of company-owned restaurant net revenue of approximately 82%. Total general and administrative expenses, excluding stock-based compensation of approximately $50 million. Adjusted EBITDA between $95 million and $105 million. Restaurant preopening expenses between $6.5 million and $7.5 million. Interest expense net of interest income between $38 million and $39 million. An effective income tax rate of approximately 10% to 20%. Total capital expenditures net of allowances received from landlords of approximately $30 million. And finally, we plan to open 6 to 10 new venues.
I will now turn the call back to Manny.
Thank you, Nicole. Before we take questions, I want to underscore our confidence in our business. Even against a mixed consumer backdrop, our results this quarter show that our strategy is working. We have expanded our market share to traffic growth at all segments. We generated substantially more cash than a year ago while investing less capital to do it, and we are very excited about the expansion of the Benihana Express brand. Backed by consistent execution, a stronger portfolio and growing franchise capabilities, we are well-positioned to build on this momentum into the second half of the year. We appreciate your ongoing support and look forward to updating you on our progress in coming quarters. As always, special thanks to our team members around the world who bring our mission to life each day, creating memorable guest experiences by running the best restaurants in every market and delivering outstanding service to every guest every time.
Nicole and I look forward to your questions. Operator?
[Operator Instructions] The first question is from Joe Gomes from NOBLE Capital Markets.
2. Question Answer
I was wondering if you could give us maybe a little more color on the impact of the New York City relocation on the quarter on the top line.
Yes. I mean I think the restaurant relo, we're expecting revenues to be somewhere between $150,000 and $200,000 a week, and we were expecting it to open right at the beginning of the quarter in Q2 and we ended up opening in July. I mean we were all -- there's a lot of reasons for that, but the primary reason is it was very difficult to get the inspections done in the city of New York, particularly during the Knicks' run for the championship. So we just seem to have a lot of challenges getting all the inspectors in and out of the restaurant to get the inspections done. But the restaurant was built by beginning of, call it, April, and we were ready to go, just kind of get all the clearances necessary to get into business. Now the costs because we had a full staff and the full team there, I mean, really the only cost that we offset would have been the direct operating costs like food costs and some of the operating supplies. But following since we lost the revenues, and we had a lot of the costs already loaded in.
Okay. And maybe that kind of plays into my next question a little bit here. Even though owned operating expenses declined year-over-year to 83.6%, you guys have guided at the end of the first quarter call to 81% to 82%. And just wanted to provide a little more color on why they were above what you were guiding to.
Yes. I mean most of the expense differential was all marketing expenses. Obviously, going into the World Cup, we never anticipated the success that the World Cup was going to have as a TV event, particularly around prime time games. And so we had to, frankly, spend a lot more marketing dollars in the quarter than we had to expect. So I would say the majority, if not all the cost differential in the quarter was primarily due to marketing costs that we spent.
Okay. And then maybe give us a little update here. You talked about in certain locations, the summer heat. We've just talked about the World Cup here. How is demand through July? Have you seen any changes given the economy out there? Are you having to continue that higher-than-expected marketing spend? Maybe just a little more color on what you've seen so far here in the early days of the third quarter.
Yes. I mean I want to reemphasize, we were positive traffic in every single one of our segments. So meaning STK, Benihana and the Grills were all positive. So every single one of our segments had positive traffic in the quarter. And then coming into the third quarter, I think the momentum has continued. I think that the World Cup not being on TV is actually a net plus for us right now. So I would say that we've actually seen a net positive on our trajectory because of the -- of what's going on with the World Cup. So I think the World Cup being over is actually beneficial to us.
Okay. And then one last one here for me, and I'll get back in queue. You talked a lot on the Benihana Express. It sounds like that could be a real nice growth area for you. Maybe you could talk a little bit more about franchisee interest in that to date. We might see some more announcements here of some bigger franchisee agreements to open more than just 1 or 2 here and there.
Yes. I mean, so we acquired the restaurants back from the franchisee towards the end. Actually, I think it was the beginning of the second quarter. And so we've only really had our work with it for 3 months directly, if you will, maybe 3.5 months. So we've done a lot of work in terms of the branding and the design elements of it. So because we have to obviously have a prototype and a buildup for it. If you go to the website, www.benihanaexpress.com, you can see exactly what we're doing with the brand. So there's a lot of the branding elements that we've worked on already there.
And then you could also look at the development coming forward with it because we have 3 new sites that we're doing with the Benihana Express. So you can get a look -- you can get a feeling for the look and feel of what the restaurants will look like in the set of new openings, we have one restaurant that's already licensed location. So [indiscernible] is actually a licensed location. And we've had interest in the last couple of weeks for additional ones. So I think the pipeline is really coming through. Obviously, having a prototype now at hand and having designs for future locations make a big difference in terms of being able to market the concept to future and potential franchisees.
Economics are great. We know what the economics look like because we do have the Brickell location. So we know what food cost, labor looks like. So those are the 2 big items that franchisees are usually interested in. And then the thing that we're super excited about it is the size of the print is only 800 to 1,000 square feet. And what that means from an occupancy perspective when food cost and labor cost is so favorable, it should provide for some incredible returns for franchisees getting into the model. And again, the revenue model is already proven because we do have the one prototype already doing the greater than $1 million AUV. So I think all the pieces are now together, and we'll continue working on our sales process to bring in more franchisees.
The next question is from Anthony Lebiedzinski from Sidoti & Company.
So just first of all, wondering if you guys saw any notable regional differences just in your operating area? Or was it more or less kind of consistent in terms of traffic and same-store sales?
I mean I think just the geography -- thanks for that question. The geography for us in the quarter was more associated with temperature. There were a significant amount of markets in the second quarter that experienced high temperature. So there are a lot of -- I think the Midwest just comes to mind right now is having really hot weather. And maybe even in the Northeast, we think it had a couple of weeks where we had some extreme weather there. So I think the big driver of the geographical differences were more on the weather side.
And then obviously, as I mentioned earlier, the World Cup did make a difference depending what time the games were on TV. So if you're having games in the middle of prime time, like in California, there were a lot of games at 7:00 p.m. I think you could probably notice a little bit of a dip in the California markets. But other than that, I think it is basically weather and some of the TV scheduling on the games. I didn't really particularly see anything more directly to any kind of consumer trends. And then our Vegas restaurant continues to do very well. I think they did well in the second quarter, and the velocity continues to be very impressive, to be quite honest. So we're very happy with the performance of our Las Vegas STK restaurant.
Got you. And then so when we look at the EBITDA for the second quarter, you guys came in at roughly $21 million. The guidance was $24 million to $26 million. So thinking about the delta, was that mostly the New York relocation gone later than planned? Or was there anything else that's meaningful to call out?
Yes. I mean I think 40% is the New York location and 60% probably would be a majority of -- on the marketing side. So that's how I would break out the delta.
Got it. Okay. And lastly for me, as far as beef costs, have you guys done anything as far as locking in anything beyond September? Or how do we think about that?
Yes. Just a little bit of additional color on your previous question. We also were at the lower end of our guidance on sales. So as you look at the EBITDA, you adjust for that. Your question was on beef. We're -- we've already locked in a significant amount of the beef through the rest of the year. So we don't see any negative impact or foresee that for the remainder of the year. Obviously, we already were pretty locked in through September, and we've already made arrangements for a significant amount of our restaurants from September until the end of the year. So I don't expect any negative impact on our margins because of beef. As a matter of fact, as Nicole mentioned, our COGS continue to be in the 19.5-ish range. So we're very happy with our cost performance, and we expect to continue doing that for the remainder of the year.
The next question is from Jim Sanderson from Northcoast Research.
I just wanted to go back to the issue of looking at the change in guidance. I think compared to last quarter, your revenue guidance is down by about $35 million. Could you just level set that for us to make sure we understand the key drivers of each of that change?
Yes. So on the revenue, the big driver is, as we've made the point on the press release and on our prepared statements is we're going asset-light. So we're opening -- the majority of our opening pipeline for the rest of this year is mostly, if you will, license and franchise sites as we laid them out on the guidance. And then some of the conversions that we have in place, we've deferred them until the end of the year. And frankly, right now, our preference is to even franchise some of those out. So we're putting a very active strategy right now to go as asset-light as we can on these locations. So the trade-off here is that we'll have less revenues and the efficiencies that will drive the royalties without having to spend the capital.
So right now, as we said in our prepared statements, we're going asset-light. And if you look at our guidance, we actually also brought down our CapEx from $40 million down to $30 million. So we're starting to really focus more on free cash flow and using that cash to work on our debt position, and then we will evaluate where it makes sense to do company-owned restaurants. So that's exactly why the revenue shifted is primarily because of that. And then we did bring our guidance on same-store sales to a lesser of a number that we had on the original guidance. So it's a combination of going asset-light and changing the same-store sales guidance for the overall year.
All right. And then you also mentioned that going forward, you had maybe 1 to 2 lease reviews per year from the Grill locations. Is that the right way to look at that, that the kind of the risk, so to speak, of closures is those lease renewals every year?
Yes. We don't have any plans on any additional Grills on our portfolio right now. As a matter of fact, we've internally reviewed that, and I don't know if you've been following the movie theater business, but movies have been very robust in the last couple of weeks. And actually, the movie theater is much more effective than it's ever been. So a lot of our Grills are in markets that still have exposure to type of venues with movies. So we're very happy with the progress that we made on our portfolio, if you will, rationalization of the Grills.
All right. All right. And then last question for me. You mentioned the potential franchising of the Benihana Express, and you really described some incredible economics. So wondering how you've sized this opportunity, meaning how many Benihana Expresses do you think there could be in the United States? And how do you plan to market the concept to investors or developers?
Yes. I mean that's a great question. I think that our positioning of the concept is that we can bring the great craveable food of the Benihana model, which we all -- we get a lot of great feedback from customers on particularly the fried rice and some of the items that we have on the menu. So it's a premium experience on a to-go basis. So our view is you can get Benihana on the go, and we can take it to very much smaller boxes, and we don't have -- we don't need as many employees or labor to run it. So it is a sizable opportunity. We just haven't put a full number to it, but we think that there's a lot of 800 to 1,000 square foot retail locations in the U.S. So we think it's a sizable opportunity for us.
And again, just to reiterate, we have one of them already doing over $1 million in revenue. Actually, it's closer to like $1.2 million in revenue. So we have a really robust top line in a small footprint. And as we pointed out, the COGS and the labor, the prime costs are super efficient, which allows us to charge our royalties and the franchisees still make a lot of money. So I suspect that there will be a lot of interest on the model. If you also go again to the website, we've already designed 2 or 3 of these smaller footprint locations, and we've worked with people on it. So I think that everything that we need from product to design to operational model, we've defined all that. Now it's just a matter of bringing in the right franchisees and selling those franchisees to people.
Again, it's also easy to train because you don't have to have the teppanyaki chef. So it's a pretty much regular type of back-of-the-house operation. So we think the universe of people interested in that is going to be relatively large.
And could you remind me what the royalty rate is that you could generate on those stores?
So Benihana franchises, we're getting 6% royalty and 2% on marketing contributions. And the license deals that we're doing on the Grills that we're talking to people about are economics that are equal to that. So those are the rates that we would expect to generate on future deals that we make on the Express.
All right. And just one last question. You mentioned some strength in Las Vegas, and I think you mentioned a little bit of momentum in July. Is it fair to say that gas prices didn't really have a material effect on consumer demand from your perspective despite concern earlier?
I mean I think if you listen to our prepared statements, we're a lot more focused on our own initiatives. So again, I don't think we have the -- I guess, the intelligence to be able to say that gas did or did not have an impact. Obviously, we do know that the general consumer environment is challenging. We could see that out there from other operators. And we do see the trade downs, right? Because if you do look at our traffic performance relative to the sales performance, we know that consumers are very discreet about where they spend their money. So they're not exactly spending robustly.
So that's why the barbell approach works really well in this environment because we're able to give access to consumers to the brand with a lower price point and promotional price points. And then we still have the premium points, which is what we emphasize in all our seasonal menus. So we're able to use both the play on value as well as upsell people to much more premium products. But again, I just -- I think there is -- that's how we see the impact, at least in our business. We don't see it on the traffic, obviously, because the traffic has been pretty good -- actually very good.
There are no further questions at this time. I would like to turn the floor back over to Manny Hilario for closing comments.
All right. Well, again, I think I'd like to thank everyone to being on this call. And as I always do, I'd like to thank our teammates again for a great job in driving great experiences and traffic in the restaurants. And I look forward to seeing everybody out in our restaurants. Everybody, have a good afternoon.
This concludes today's teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.
ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. — Q1 2026 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Greetings, and welcome to The ONE Group First Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to your host, Nicole Thaung. Please go ahead.
Thank you, operator, and hello, everyone. Before we begin our formal remarks, let me remind you that part of our discussion today will include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and you should not place undue reliance on them. These statements are also subject to numerous risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from what we expect.
Please also note that these forward-looking statements reflect our opinion only as of the date of this call. We undertake no obligation to revise or publicly release any revisions of these forward-looking statements, considering new information or future events. We refer you to our recent SEC filings for a more detailed discussion of the risks that could impact our future operating results and financial condition.
During today's call, we will discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures, which we believe can be useful in evaluating our performance. However, the presentation of these matters or other information should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for results prepared in accordance with GAAP.
For reconciliations of these measures, such as adjusted EBITDA, restaurant operating profit, comparable sales, annual adjusted operating income and total food and beverage sales of company-owned, managed, licensed and franchise units to GAAP measures, along with a discussion of why we consider these measures useful, please see our earnings release issued today. With that, I would like to turn the call over to Emanuel P. Hilario.
Thank you, Nicole, and good afternoon, everyone. I appreciate you joining us today. I want to start where I always do by thanking our teammates. Every day, our teams across every brand and market show up focused on creating memorable experiences for our guests. These days, consistency is more important than ever, and I appreciate all that they do in executing with excellence and upholding the Vibe Dining experience that defines our brands.
Today, I will begin with an overview of our first quarter performance, and then I will walk you through our progress with respect to our strategic priorities before turning it over to Nicole for the financial details.
We are excited about our continued momentum. Our operational performance is resulting in strong financial results. Total GAAP revenues grew year-over-year, and comparable sales are sequentially better than the previous quarter.
The restaurant's cost of sales improved to 19.4% from 20.8% in the prior year quarter. Operating income increased 30%. Adjusted EBITDA increased 12.1%. And capital expenditures, net of tenant improvement allowances, reduced 23% year-over-year as we prioritize capital-efficient growth and free cash flow generation.
Total GAAP revenues for the first quarter were $213 million, an increase from $211 million in the same quarter last year. First quarter consolidated comparable sales were relatively flat at a negative 0.3%, representing a continuation of the positive momentum we experienced exiting the fourth quarter.
For clarity, consolidated comparable sales are reported on the same number of days year-over-year. Looking at each brand, U.S. STK total comparable sales reported another positive quarter at 1.4%. Benihana's comparable sales were flat, reflecting stable demand for the brand. And our Grill Concepts comparable sales, while down 4.9%, represented the strongest quarterly performance since early 2023, and Grill transactions was positive for the quarter. Each segment continues to improve from the previous quarter.
What is most notable, particularly in a period of elevated inflation, is the strength of our margin performance, a direct result of the hard work we have been doing across our supply chain, including, most importantly, beef sourcing.
Restaurant operating profit increased 11% to $40 million, while restaurant operating profit margins expanded 100 basis points to 19%. The margin improvement was driven by a 140 basis point reduction in food and beverage costs, reflecting menu optimization, integration synergies, and supply chain efficiencies. We also achieved a 40 basis point improvement in restaurant operating expenses as a percentage of restaurant revenues.
STK delivered particularly strong results with restaurant operating profit margins expanding 280 basis points to 21%, while Benihana margins improved 130 basis points to 21%. Adjusted EBITDA grew 12% to $29 million. The improvement was driven by cost management discipline, our contracted beef pricing, continued Benihana integration synergies, and the benefit of portfolio optimization actions.
The key point I want to make is that these results are execution-driven. We are not dependent on macroeconomic recovery or shifts in consumer sentiment, but would certainly welcome them. Over the past 18 months, we have implemented a series of strategic initiatives, operational improvements at Benihana, the Barbell Strategy at STK, portfolio optimization across the growth concepts, and rigorous cost management. It is those initiatives that are driving our successful performance.
Now, let me update you on our four strategic priorities.
Priority One: accelerating comparable sales through execution. Our first strategic priority is accelerating comparable sales through disciplined execution. I want to highlight that Valentine's Day 2026 was a record-breaking day for our portfolio. Easter was also strong across our brands, while sales were up in the high single digits compared to last year. These results are a testament to both the operational capabilities we have built and the strength of our brands as a celebration destination.
As we look ahead, we are gearing up for what we expect to be a strong Mother's Day and graduation season. Both occasions are critically important to us, and our teams are focused on delivering exceptional guest experiences during these high-volume periods. Through the first 5 weeks of the second quarter, the company has positive comparable sales and transactions.
Momentum has continued through all of our brands with STK and Benihana so far, delivering positive comparable sales, and the growth is sequentially improving. We have made operational improvements to position the brands for a strong spring and summer and are seeing encouraging trends as Happy Hour has been a real driver and is working well, while lunch traffic is also returning.
Our Friends with Benefits Loyalty Program continue to gain momentum. Since launching last year, we have added over 8,000 new organic members to the program per week. Newly enrolled guests continue to show strong repeat participation, and we are seeing loyalty members spend more per visit compared to non-loyalty guests.
We will be actively targeting our Friends with Benefits members for Mother's Day and graduation celebrations, leveraging personalized outreach to drive traffic during these occasions. We continue to focus on growing membership, driving organic sign-ups, and increasing engagement within the program to strengthen brand connection and repeat visits.
We are driving growth through seasonal innovation, launching new food and beverage menus 4 times a year across our brands. This keeps our offerings fresh, differentiates us from competitors, and generates strong engagement on social media. We are expanding our off-premises business with a focus on curbside operations.
Highlights include burgers and sides, which continue to drive strong takeout and delivery volume across all brands and Benihana and RA Sushi, fried rice burritos for takeout and delivery, which have performed well.
Priority Two: capital-efficient growth with disciplined expansion. Next, our second priority is capital-efficient growth. We currently have two company-owned STK restaurants and one company-owned Benihana restaurant under construction, an STK in Phoenix, Arizona, a relocation of STK downtown in New York City and a Benihana in Seattle, Washington. We intend to open 6 to 10 new venues in 2026 as we prioritize locations requiring $1.5 million or less in net capital investment to open.
Capital expenditures, net of TI allowances was 23% lower at $10 million in the first quarter compared to the year ago period. Of this amount, $6.5 million was related to new restaurant construction with the remainder supporting existing restaurants. This reduction reflects our disciplined approach to capital allocation as we focus on high-return capital-efficient growth.
On the franchise side, our 10-unit California Benihana and Benihana Express development agreement continues to progress and our commitment for franchise Benihana and a licensed Benihana Express in the Florida Keys remains on track. The Benihana Express format continues to generate strong franchise interest as it delivers the Benihana food experience without teppanyaki tables, making it more labor efficient and more appealing from a cost of entry perspective for potential franchisees.
In January, we completed the relocation of our Kona Grill in San Antonio, Texas to a smaller footprint location. And in February, we converted a franchise Benihana Monterrey, California to a company-owned restaurant to accommodate a long-term franchise partner who wish to retire. Both are tracking in line with our expectations.
Priority Three: portfolio optimization to improve returns. Our third priority is the portfolio optimization to improve returns, and we have made significant progress improving the quality and returns of our portfolio. As we discussed last quarter, we are converting Grill locations to higher-performing STKs and Benihanas. In 2025, we exited 6 RA Sushi and Kona Grill locations. And in January 2026, we exited one additional RA Sushi location that did not fit our conversion criteria.
The remaining Grill locations are healthy, profitable restaurants in quality real estate, and we expect them to generate approximately $10 million in restaurant level EBITDA and over $100 million in revenue. 5 Grill locations closed on January 5, 2026, for conversion to either Benihana or STK. Construction is in progress with all 5 expected to reopen by the end of 2026.
Each conversion is expected to cost between $1 million and $1.5 million and to be EBITDA accretive. As a reminder, our first conversion, the RA Sushi to STK in Scottsdale, Arizona is currently operating at a run rate of approximately $7 million in annual sales, delivering an increase of over $4 million in sales and a return on investment of approximately 4x. This validates our conversion strategy and gives us confidence in the pipeline.
As we have said before, we will continue to evaluate the portfolio as leases expire. We have approximately one to two Grill leases that come up each year as part of the natural end of cycle process, and we'll make decisions on a case-by-case basis.
Priority Four: maintaining balance sheet strength and flexibility. Our fourth priority for 2026 is conserving cash and optimizing the balance sheet. We are significantly reducing discretionary capital expenditures, targeting company-owned development to projects requiring on average, $1.5 million or less in build-out costs. We are also working through our existing lease pipeline rather than adding new commitments. This discipline gives us flexibility in an uncertain environment and position us to invest selectively in the highest return opportunities.
We finished the quarter with $6.6 million in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash. We have $33.7 million available under our revolving credit facility. Under current conditions, our term loan does not have a financial covenant.
Cash flow from operations was a strong $22 million compared to $9 million in the prior year quarter. This improvement was primarily attributable to increased net income and collections on holiday credit card receivables. We also reduced our debt with $2 million in repayments under the credit agreement and $7 million in repayments on the revolving facility, bringing our revolving facility balance to 0.
As we discussed on our previous call, we expect to generate free cash flow in 2026. Debt reduction and creating shareholder value remain a top priority.
Before I turn it over to Nicole for the financial details, I want to reiterate, the items that I have outlined today are fundamentally execution-driven and within our direct control. We are focused on strategic initiatives that position us to deliver results regardless of broader economic trends.
With that, I will turn the call over to Nicole.
Thank you, Manny. As a reminder, beginning this year, we are reporting financial information on a fiscal quarter basis using four 13-week quarters with the addition of a 53rd week when necessary. For 2026, our fiscal calendar began on December 29, 2025, and our first quarter contained 91 days.
Consolidated comparable sales are reported on the same number of days year-over-year. Let me start by discussing our first quarter financials in greater detail before introducing our outlook for the second quarter of 2026 and reiterating our fiscal '26 guidance with the exception of an update to our expected effective tax rate.
Total consolidated GAAP revenues were $212.8 million, increasing 0.8% from $211.1 million for the same quarter last year.
Growth was driven by two primary factors: the fiscal calendar shift that moved New Year's Eve into fiscal '26, which added approximately $8.3 million to our top line as well as contributions from new openings and conversions completed in the second half of 2025. These gains were partially offset by the closure of underperforming Grill locations as part of our portfolio optimization strategy, which reduced revenues by approximately $1.8 million.
Included in total revenues were our company-owned restaurants net revenues of $209.3 million, which increased 0.9% from $207.4 million for the prior year quarter. The increase was primarily due to the change in the fiscal year calendar, which resulted in a shift in New Year's Eve into fiscal year '26 and the sales generated by 8 new restaurants. These gains were partially offset by a decrease in revenue from the Grill restaurants closed, and a 0.3% decrease in comparable restaurant sales.
Management license franchise and incentive fee revenues decreased slightly to $3.5 million from $3.7 million in the prior year quarter. The decrease is primarily attributable to the exit of a management agreement in Scottsdale, Arizona in the second quarter of 2025. As Manny noted, we converted a former RA Sushi to a company-owned STK in that market.
Now turning to expenses. We continue to implement targeted cost management initiatives. Last year, we made strategic adjustments to our beef tenderloin sourcing and have contracted pricing through September 2026, eliminating our exposure to significant U.S. beef price fluctuations and providing significant cost certainty. We also optimized our labor structure across the business last year by improving scheduling management, and we are still realizing synergies from the Benihana acquisition.
Company-owned restaurant cost of sales as a percentage of company-owned restaurant net revenue improved 140 basis points to 19.4% from 20.8%. This improvement was primarily due to menu optimization, integration synergies, supply chain initiatives, increased menu pricing and more efficient cost of sales associated with New Year's Eve and our record-breaking Valentine's Day.
Company-owned restaurant operating expenses as a percentage of company-owned restaurant net revenue improved 40 basis points to 61.7% from 62.1%. This reflects improvement in labor costs.
Restaurant operating profit, excluding Grill Concepts restaurants closed, was $39.9 million or 19.1% of owned restaurant net revenue, improving by 100 basis points from 18.1% in the prior year quarter.
On a total reported basis, General & Administrative costs increased $1.9 million to $15 million from $13.1 million in the same quarter prior year, driven by inflation on salaries and bonus, higher audit-related fees, investments in information technology, specifically AI-related technologies and increased marketing expenses.
When adjusting for stock-based compensation of $1.1 million, adjusted General & Administrative expenses were $13.9 million compared to $11.5 million in the first quarter of 2025. As a percentage of revenues, when adjusting for stock-based compensation, adjusted General & Administrative costs were 6.5% compared to 5.4% in the prior year.
Depreciation and amortization expense was $10.4 million compared to $9.8 million in the prior year quarter. The increase is attributed to new restaurants opened during fiscal year '25.
Lease termination and restaurant closure expenses were $2 million for this quarter, primarily as a result of the Grill portfolio optimization, which included $500,000 in noncash expenses related to closed restaurants.
Preopening expenses were approximately $1.5 million, primarily related to preopening rent for restaurants under development, including $500,000 in noncash rent and payroll costs for Kona Grill Landmark, which opened in January 2026.
Preopening expenses decreased by $200,000 compared to the prior year period. Transition and integration expenses were $500,000, down significantly from $3.7 million in the prior year quarter as we're nearing completion of the integration of the Benihana and RA Sushi acquisition.
Operating income was $13.9 million compared to operating income of $10.7 million in the first quarter of '25, an increase of $3.2 million, primarily due to improved restaurant operating profit and the reduction in transition and integration costs. For a reconciliation, please refer to our press release issued earlier today.
Interest expense was $9.7 million compared to $9.8 million in the prior year quarter. Our weighted average interest rate was 10.2% compared to 10.9% in the prior year quarter. Provision for income taxes was $1.2 million compared to $300,000 in the prior year quarter as a result of an increase in pretax book income. Net income attributable to The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. was $3.2 million compared to net income of $1 million in the first quarter of 2025.
Net loss available to common stockholders was $6.2 million or $0.20 net loss per share compared to $6.6 million in the first quarter of 2025 or $0.21 net loss per share. Adjusted EBITDA attributable to The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. was $28.8 million compared to $25.7 million in the prior year quarter, an increase of 12.1%.
We finished the quarter with $6.6 million in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents. We have $33.7 million available under our revolving credit facility, subject to certain conditions. And as Manny said, as of quarter end, we had no borrowings outstanding on our revolving credit facility nor does our term loan currently require a financial covenant.
Now I would like to provide some forward-looking commentary regarding our business. This commentary is subject to risks and uncertainties associated with forward-looking statements as discussed in our SEC filings. We remind our investors that the actual number and timing of new restaurants for any given period is subject to factors outside of the company's control, including macroeconomic conditions, weather and factors under the control of landlords, contractors, licensees and regulatory and licensing authorities.
Based on the information available now and the expectations as of today, we are issuing the following financial targets for the second quarter of 2026.
Beginning with the top line, we project total GAAP revenues of between $202 million and $206 million, which reflects our anticipation of consolidated comparable sales of 1% to 2%. Management license franchise and incentive fee revenue are expected to be approximately $3 million to $4. Total company-owned operating expenses as a percentage of company-owned restaurant net revenue between 81% and 82%.
Total G&A, excluding stock-based compensation, between $13 million and $14 million; adjusted EBITDA of between $24 million and $26 million; and finally, restaurant preopening expenses of between $1 million and $2 million.
Based on the information available to us now and our expectations as of today, we are reiterating the following financial targets for fiscal year '26 with the exception of increasing the range of the effective tax rate.
We project total GAAP revenues of between $840 million and $855 million, which reflects our anticipation of consolidated comparable sales of 1% to 3%.
Management license franchise and incentive fee revenues are expected to be between $14 million and $15 million; total company-owned operating expenses as a percentage of company-owned restaurant net revenue of approximately 82% to 83%; total G&A, excluding stock-based compensation of approximately $53 million; adjusted EBITDA of between $100 million and $110 million; restaurant preopening expense of between $5 million and $6 million; an effective income tax rate of approximately 10% to 20%; total capital expenditures, net of allowances received from landlords of between $38 million and $42 million. And finally, we plan to open 6 to 10 new venues. With that, I will now turn the call back to Manny.
Thank you, Nicole. Before we open up for questions, I want to emphasize how excited we are about our business. Although the current environment remains challenging, our future looks bright. With our proven ability to execute, strengthened portfolio and expanded franchise capabilities, we are well positioned to capture the significant opportunities ahead of us.
We thank you for your continued support and look forward to sharing our progress in the quarters ahead. And as always, a special thanks to all teammates all over the globe that live our mission every day, creating great guest memories by operating the best restaurants in every market by delivering exceptional and unforgettable guest experiences to every guest every time. Nicole and I look forward to your questions. Operator?
[Operator Instructions] The first question we have is from Joe Gomes of NOBLE Capital Markets.
2. Question Answer
I just want to start. The revenues were a little below what the guide was for the first quarter and the comps were a little off from where the guide was. And just maybe give us a little more color there, Manny, on what transpired during the quarter to cause that slight miss.
Yes. I mean I think the only thing that was less than we expected in the quarter was the, our volume at our STKs in malls, really the first year where we've had two restaurants fully operating in the first quarter in the mall. I think that the first quarter is a little different from the other quarters for those restaurants. So, I would say just the seasonality of our mall STKs was a little bit different than what we expected.
But other than that, I think that the quarter was solid. I think the only other noise in the quarter was just spring break this year seemed to have a lot of different changes in terms of how people took their holidays. And then I think just Easter being much earlier, it just is a little bit of a different cadence of sales, if you will, in the year. But overall, I thought that the business was very strong in our brands.
And then I think also last quarter, you talked about the conversions you were hoping to have them all done by mid-July, and now it sounds like at the end of the year. Anything there? Is it just extended construction cycles or you just being a little more conservative in the conversion opportunity?
No, I just think it's just the pacing of resources to reopen them out properly. I mean there are reloads and if you will, conversion sites, but you still have to go through the full training cycle. So, I think the timing of all these restaurants is really based on how we feel about the right pace of opening the units without being negatively impactful to operations. So, it's really just a timing pace, making sure that you're moving your opening teams to the right places at the right time. So, it's just an internal judgment relative to when we want to open the restaurants.
And then last one for me, and I'll jump back in queue. Anything new on the franchising front or some more of the nontraditional venues that you had some success that we reported on the past couple of quarters, but just wondering if anything new in the in the pipeline there?
Yes. I mean I think franchising still lots of interest. We're actively talking to people all the time. We have amped up our resources behind getting new deals. So, I think it's progressing really well and interest is very high. So, I'm very pleased with the progress, and I feel very positive about the outlook relative to franchising, particularly for Benihana.
The next question we have is from Anthony Lebiedzinski of Sidoti & Co.
So Emanuel, just wondering if you guys saw any notable regional differences in terms of your same-store sales performance in the quarter?
Yes. I mean I think for us, if there was one market that stood out a little bit differently, was Texas. We did see a little bit of different trends in Texas. But other than that, everything was relatively very similar. So that's probably the only market. And if I have to drill down a little bit more, I think Dallas per se was one of the markets where we saw a little bit more softness in the business. But other than that, as our results show coming into the second quarter, we have a lot of momentum and sales are positive for the company and transactions. So, in this environment, I believe that to be a really strong testament to the initiatives and all the activities that we're doing in building traffic and sales.
So as it relates to Texas, was there any change in the competitive landscape? Or was it something else that drove some of the softness there, you think?
I think in Dallas specifically, I think it's just a very competitive market, and there's always a lot of competition coming into that market. So, I just think it's the, at least from my perspective and our perspective in that market is that there's just a lot of people playing in that market. And so, there's, from time to time, you will have a little bit of up and down in the business there just because there's just a lot of people, it's an attractive market. It's a large market, and everybody wants to have a restaurant in Dallas. So, I think it's just a matter of what the competitors are doing in the marketplace.
Understood. Okay. And then in terms of the commentary about the second quarter same-store sales, which are tracking positive, can you give us a sense as to traffic versus ticket? What's the kind of breakdown approximately?
Well, we're up in traffic. So, it's a good lead in. And I think that, to me, that's the most important part of that mix of sales is that our initiatives, particularly around value and our continuous messaging around happy hour and some of the great price points we have at lunch and at dinner are starting to really resonate.
And our marketing is starting to really make lots of progress in communicating those value points. So, I feel very good about that. And then Benihana, we also launched our Power Lunch offering, which is starting at $15 $15.95, 45-minute guarantee. Lunch is starting to also gain traction. So, I feel really good about all the initiatives, and we're starting to see progress made on building traffic.
Got it. Okay. And last question for me. Nicole, you mentioned that there were some Benihana cost synergies realized in the quarter. Can you expand on that? And are there any other synergies that you think may be realized this year as it relates to the Benihana acquisition?
Yes. I think one of the biggest synergies we're still realizing is the beef contracts, combining the different brands that are both very heavily reliant on beef products, we were able to secure a pretty decent contract. So that's something that we'll continue to see through the coming months. We're also seeing some of our other contracts that were placed over the last year or so in terms of linens and other operating supplies that we're still realizing synergies on as well.
The next question we have is from Mark Smith of Lake Street Capital.
Alex on the line for Mark Smith today. Just first one for me. Looking at capital allocation priorities, you made good progress on the balance sheet with the revolver now paid down to zero free cash flow generation improving as leverage comes down further, how are you guys thinking about balancing debt reduction and conversion investments and potentially becoming more active on share repurchases?
I mean I think as you saw in the quarter, our focus has been debt, right, because we did pay the revolver as well as term loan. And so that will be, continue to be a priority is really focusing on debt and really balancing that with a growth portfolio of restaurants that is really cost effective. So that's really kind of on the short-term is our primary objectives. Of course, capital allocation and shareholder value creation is always a priority of our Board. So, we always are actively looking at anything and everything that makes sense in terms of creating value for the shareholders.
Okay. And last one for me, just switching over to the restaurants. Benihana Express seems to be getting a lot of traction from a franchise interest standpoint. Maybe just talk about how you view that long-term opportunity for that format relative to the traditional Benihana concept and what you think franchisees are finding most attractive about the model today?
Yes. I mean, good question. What the franchise interest is around the product itself, the fact that we have fantastic fried rice products and protein offerings going with it. So, there's excitement about the product offering. There's also excitement about the price point positioning of that product because, being a Benihana product, it's a premium in market. So, they do like that.
Then, of course, franchising economics are paramount. So, I think within the Benihana Express, we get the best of Benihana in great COGS, Cost of Goods. And then we also get a very beneficial labor equation, meaning that we don't have service at the table, a teppanyaki table. So there's a really relatively predictable and strong labor model on that.
And then obviously, it goes without saying, the fact that these footprints are small, occupancy is also very effective. And then also the fact that the footprint is smaller allows for a lot more flexibility in terms of what real estate is available for that brand.
So again, you start adding all those things. And of course, the cost of development is also very affordable relative to building other full-sized stores. So I think once you add all those up, the franchisees are very interested in pursuing that.
The next question we have is from James Sanderson of Northcoast Research.
I wanted to go back to your update on same-store sales and traffic and build on that. Any feedback on what your bookings are looking like from Mother's Day and graduation events relative to where you were, say, one year ago?
I mean, without getting to precise numbers, I would say that traffic is positive coming into the quarter. And I think just in line with that, I think in general, our bookings, because we do manage that very closely, our books in general are very solid. So I would say that I feel very good about the forward look on the books.
Excellent. Shifting over to your store margin guidance, I noticed that relative to the first half of the year, you're probably expecting some modest margin compression. Can you walk through how margin is going to progress over the year?
I mean for us, it's always the third quarter, right? So, we always have first quarter, second quarter and fourth quarter are always very good margins. And of course, our third quarter is our lowest-volume quarter. And so we do always get that shift in margin in the third quarter just because of seasonality.
So, other than that, everything in the margin, as Nicole reported during her update, is strong, and we have great momentum in COGS. As a matter of fact, our Cost of Goods is the lowest we've ever reported as a company. And I think the margin overall outlook for the year is very solid.
And then speaking to margin a little bit more, you mentioned you've got beef visibility until September. Any thoughts on what you're looking at for locking in those prices as we get to the holiday quarter?
I mean, always an active dialogue about what we do with beef. I think the thing that we spend a lot, and of course, I don't have a crystal ball, so I wish I could give you an exact fourth quarter look on beef. But again, our view on beef is still a tough market right now. And so there's a lot to manage there.
But our focus really with beef right now is just looking at alternative cuts and promotional windows to try to take advantage of other cuts that might be lower cost than maybe a filet or something else. So, it's really more about P-mix management and starting to really plan out for Q4 promotional windows that are not so reliant on filets because that takes pressure off the cost line.
Very good. And then I think you also reported your weighted average interest rate was down. Could you walk us through what's driving that and what your outlook for the rest of the year is?
I think that the Fed rates came down a bit, which impacts overall rates. So I think that's the big part of it. And again, our focus on that right now is to as much as we have free cash flow is to bring it down. And that's our number one objective as we go forward, is to really balance that growth and be effective on growth and still have free cash flow to service debt so we keep bringing that principal down.
All right. Last question for me. Any feedback on what your off-premises mix was in the first quarter and how that was broken up between delivery and pickup, third-party delivery and pickup?
As I reported in previous quarters, very low double digits as a percentage of mix in delivery. And I think that the majority of our mix right now is still reliant on delivery. It's more delivery than pickup at the restaurants.
And as you might imagine, our focus right now is building up that pickup at the store because that's more P&L effective. And we think that there's also big opportunities on that.
The next question we have is from Roger Lipton of Lipton Financial Services.
A great number of my potential questions have been answered. I did want to just explore a little bit more the store-level margin, which it looks like you could have been in a position to bring down the operating expenses, bring up your margin a little bit for the full-year guidance, beating the first quarter by, I guess, 150 basis points, 160 basis points over the mid 80%, the 19.1% instead of 17.5% at the midpoint of your previous guidance.
And in the second quarter, you're 81% to 82% to 83% in terms of expense totals. So, it looks like maybe you've got a little room for the full year to improve upon that 82% to 83%.
I mean, again, thanks Roger, and good to hear from you. I think our view on this, and as I answered the previous question, is our fourth quarter is really a big quarter, and I just want to make sure that we have numbers that we're super comfortable with. And again, I'm very happy with our first quarter results, and I think that we're making tremendous progress in the second quarter and forward.
But I always want to make sure that we're realistic about the environment. It's still a challenging environment. Lots of noise with gas prices. And as you know, gas prices over time can impact your supply chain. So again, I'm not saying that we believe that that's ultimately going to happen, but we're just being cautious about how we go about guiding for the rest of the year on the margin.
Okay. That's fair. And just, you went over so quickly, the new economics on that Scottsdale conversion. You're saying the ROI, increasing the ROI by 4x. Could you just run by those numbers one more time quickly?
That's a good question. So just for clarity, that restaurant was doing about $3 million to $4 million in revenues. It's now north of $7 million. So we grew revenues there by about $4 million, we think, year-over-year on an annual basis, and we spent about $1 million getting that $4 million in sales. So it's really a 4x return on sales on the investment we put in the site.
Sales, I'm sorry. The ROI will also be very good because that $4 million increase in revenues will drive a significant amount of incremental EBITDA. So our ROI on that conversion will be very, very high.
Ladies and gentlemen, we have reached the end of the question-and-answer session. And I would like to turn the conference call back to Manny Hilario for closing remarks.
Thank you, everyone. I appreciate everyone taking time to be with us here today. As I said earlier, we're very excited about the future for the company. And as I always tell everyone, none of this would be possible without the incredible contributions from all our teammates who live our mission every day. So I want to thank them all once again.
And then I look forward to running into all of you in our restaurants. So everybody have a great summer. Back to you, operator.
Thank you. This concludes today's conference. Thank you for joining us. You may now disconnect your lines.
ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. — Q4 2025 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Good day, and welcome to The ONE Group Fourth Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please note this event is being recorded.
I would now like to turn the conference over to Nicole Thaung, CEO (sic) [ CFO ]. Please go ahead.
Thank you, operator, and hello, everyone.
Before we begin our formal remarks, let me remind you that part of our discussion today will include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and you should not place undue reliance on them. These statements are also subject to numerous risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from what we expect. Please also note that these forward-looking statements reflect our opinion only as of the date of this call. We undertake no obligation to revise or publicly release any revisions to these forward-looking statements considering new information or future events. We refer you to our recent SEC filings for a more detailed discussion of the risks that could impact our future operating results and financial condition.
During today's call, we will discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures, which we believe can be useful in evaluating our performance. However, the presentation of these measures or other information should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for results prepared in accordance with GAAP. For reconciliations of these measures, such as adjusted EBITDA, restaurant operating profit, comparable sales, annual adjusted operating income and total food and beverage sales of company-owned, managed licensed and franchise units to GAAP measures, along with the discussion of why we consider these measures useful, please see our earnings release issued today.
With that, I would like to turn the call over to Manny Hilario.
Thank you, Nicole, and good afternoon, everyone. I appreciate you joining us today. I want to start where I always do by thanking our people. Every day, our teams across every brand and market show up focused on execution and creating memorable experiences for our guests. In an environment like this one, consistency is everything, and I appreciate all that they do in executing with excellence and upholding the vibe dining experience that defines our brands. Today, I will begin with an overview of our performance, and then I will walk you through our strategic priorities for 2026 and beyond.
As we shared in January, total GAAP revenue for the full year 2025 was approximately $805 million, representing approximately 20% growth year-over-year, driven primarily by the inclusion of Benihana for all 12 periods. Full year 2025 comparable sales declined approximately 3.7%, reflecting continued pressure across the full service guiding segment. For the fourth quarter, total GAAP revenue was approximately $207 million compared to $222 million in the prior year quarter. It is important to understand the 2 main drivers of that comparison. First, approximately 35% of the year-over-year revenue decline was driven by portfolio optimization actions, including the closure of underperforming RA Sushi and Kona Grill locations. These were not reactive decisions. They were the result of a deliberate evaluation of returns, real estate quality and long-term fit. While these closures reduced near-term revenue, they improved the quality and durability of the portfolio.
Second, our fiscal calendar shift resulted in a fiscal year of only 362 days. The fourth quarter had 1 fewer operating day and the years shifted to fiscal 2026. Historically, that is one of our better sales day in the full year. Fourth quarter consolidated comparable sales declined approximately 1.8% representing about 4 points of sequential improvement from the third quarter. What is important to note is that all brands demonstrated sequential improvement in comparable sales during the quarter. That momentum has accelerated to 2026. That was not just a holiday spike. This is sustained execution. Year-to-date consolidated comparable sales are slightly positive. This represents a significant inflection point for the business and demonstrates that our execution work is paying off. We are achieving this while consumer confidence sits at historical lows, which makes it even more meaningful.
We are extremely pleased with each of our brands' performance. Year-to-date, both Benihana and STK are positive in sales. Kona Grill's turnaround is gaining traction. While year-to-date comparable sales are down mid-single digits, transactions are positive, representing the best same-store performance for the brand since the beginning of 2023. This validates our strategic focus of optimizing the portfolio for the right locations and unit economics. We are growing consolidated same-store sales with flat to positive traffic, while many full-service concepts are still facing traffic declines. This reflects strong execution across our portfolio, better table efficiency at Benihana, our barbell strategy at STK, improved unit economics at Kona Grill and operational discipline throughout. What sets us apart is our vibe dining positioning. As consumers dine out less frequently, they seek experiences that combine quality food with entertainment, energy and a sense of occasion. We embody these attributes and they resonate with guests.
With that context, let me walk you through our strategic priorities. Priority one, accelerating same-store sales through execution. Driving same-store sales remains our top priority. We have established clear measurable initiatives for 2026 to ensure we execute at the highest level across all brands and are guiding to a 1% to 3% increase this year. We are focused on operational excellence across multiple dimensions social review scores, secret shopper revaluation and [ EquoSure ] assessments. We have set ambitious benchmarks in each area that represent the level of consistency required to build guest frequency in today's environment. The holiday season reinforced Benihana's strength as a destination for celebrations. As we have discussed in prior quarters, frequency remains the biggest opportunity for the brand. Guests love the chef experience, showmanship and the social nature of the tables. Our focus has been making the overall experience more comfortable, more efficient and more repeatable. Table efficiency and improved reservation and throughput management remain among the most impactful levers in the business. This is not about rushing guests. It's about eliminating unnecessary downtime. Through better logistics, improved staffing and better coordination between the front and back of the house, we are reducing turn times while improving guest satisfaction.
Valentine's Day 2026 was a record-breaking performance for our portfolio. Over 40 restaurants exceeded 1,000 coverage for the day, which we view as a testament to both the operational capabilities we have built and the strength of our brands as celebration destinations. The ability to execute at that volume while maintaining the quality and experience our guests expect demonstrates the progress we have made on throughput, staffing and operational excellence. Cost predictability is central to our operational excellence. Last year, we strategically shifted our protein sourcing and contracted beef pricing on beef tenderloin and other cuts through September 2026, eliminating our exposure to volatile U.S. beef markets. This decision, combined with continued Benihana integration synergies is driving meaningful margin improvement while providing the cost certainty we need to execute our growth strategy.
At STK, our barbell strategy is resonating. Guests are being more intentional about when and how they dine. Value offerings bring them in during the week, premium menus and celebrations drive weekends and holidays. Returning to positive comps in the fourth quarter was an important milestone and Valentine's Day reinforced that STK is the go-to destination for special occasions. We are expanding brand awareness through marketing and digital initiatives. In 2025, we launched Friends with Benefits, our loyalty program, which gives us a direct line to our most frequent guests and allows us to drive targeted traffic during key dayparts. Additionally, we are leveraging product innovation through seasonal menus for both food and beverage to keep our offerings fresh and differentiated from competitors. We are also focused on driving off-premises business with particular emphasis on growing our curbside operations. While dine-in remains our core business, off-premises represent an incremental revenue opportunity with attractive margins.
Underpinning all of this is our commitment to our people. Through the power of ONE, our goal is to hire, train, develop and retain the best team in the industry. In this labor market, retaining talent is a competitive advantage and drives the consistency that shows up in guest scores. Across the portfolio, we are investing in operational excellence, culinary innovation and targeted marketing, the same 3 pillars we talk about regularly. These are execution-driven initiatives, and they are within our control.
Priority two, capital-efficient growth with disciplined expansion. Our second priority is a capital-efficient growth, and we made meaningful progress in 2025. During the fourth quarter, we entered into 2 significant asset-light development agreements that demonstrate the scalability and appeal of our brands. We secured development rights for 10 Benihana and Benihana Express locations in California, representing the largest asset-light development agreement in the company's history. We also secured a commitment for an additional franchise Benihana location and a licensed Benihana Express location in the Florida East. These agreements allow us to accelerate growth in high-quality markets with sophisticated operators that are committed to our iconic brand while preserving our own capital. Benihana Express is a key element of our growth strategy. It delivers the Benihana food experience without the [indiscernible] at tables, making it more labor efficient and highly franchise friendly. This format gives us a scalable asset-light engine for future expansion.
We also continue expanding into nontraditional venues, particularly professional sports and entertainment stadiums. Today, we operate Benihana and STK concepts in high-traffic stating environments that generate millions of fan impressions annually, inspiring confidence in the flexibility and scalability of our concepts. These venues introduce our brands to a wide audience in a highly efficient format with limited capital investments and attractive high-margin royalty revenue. In the fourth quarter, we renewed our concession agreement at the Mortgage Matchup Center in Phoenix, home of the Suns and Mercury. The renewal extended our Benihana presence and creates an opportunity to introduce STK branded offerings. We also secured a new Benihana concession at UBS Arena in Elmont, New York, expanding our footprint in the New York metro area and complementing our existing presence at Yankee Stadium.
On the company-owned side, our fourth quarter openings delivered strong returns. We completed our first conversion of our RA Sushi to an STK in Scottsdale, Arizona. The results have been encouraging. This location converted in approximately 8 weeks at a build-out cost of about $1 million, and it's currently operating at a run rate of approximately $7 million in annual sales, delivering an increase of over $4 million in sales and a return on investment on sales of approximately 4x. This validates our conversion strategy. We also opened a new STK in Oak Brook, Illinois for approximately $1.5 million. Both locations exemplify our second-generation strategy focused on capital efficiency and rapid returns.
In 2026, we are maintaining the same level of capital discipline. We have already relocated our Kona Grill in San Antonio, Texas to a superior, smaller footprint location in January and converted a franchise Benihana in Monterrey, California to a company-owned in February as our franchise was looking to retire. Beyond physical expansion, we continue pursuing capital-light ways to extend our brands beyond the 4 walls of the restaurant, and the Benihana brand gives us a unique opportunity to do that thoughtfully. During the fourth quarter, we launched Benihana Branded Crispy Chicken Chips through a third-party partnership. This is a small disciplined way to extend the brand beyond the restaurant, increase awareness and test new channels without meaningful capital or operational complexity.
Priority three, portfolio optimization to improve returns. We have made significant progress improving our Grill portfolio. In 2025, we exited 6 underperforming RA Sushi and Kona Grill locations. While these decisions impacted near-term revenue, they improved the quality and returns of the portfolio overall. We have identified up to 5 additional Grill locations for conversion to Benihana or STK by the end of 2026. These locations closed of January 5, 2026, in preparation for conversion. We expect each conversion to cost between $1 million and $1.5 million and be EBITDA accretive, representing a compelling use of capital. Additionally, in January, we exited 1 RA Sushi location that did not fit our conversion criteria.
Priority four, maintaining balance sheet strength and flexibility. Our priority for 2026 is conserving cash and optimizing the balance sheet. We are significantly reducing discretionary capital expenditures, targeting company-owned development to projects require on an average $1.5 million or less in build-out costs. We are also working through our existing lease pipeline rather than adding new commitments. This discipline gives us flexibility in an uncertain environment and position us to invest selectively in the highest return opportunities.
With that, I will turn the call over to Nicole to walk through the financials in more detail.
Thank you, Manny. As a reminder, beginning this year, we're reporting financial information on a fiscal quarter basis using 4 13-week quarters with the addition of a 53rd week when necessary. For 2025, our fiscal year calendar began on January 1, 2025, and ended on December 28, 2025, and was comprised of 362 days. Our fourth quarter contained 91 days.
Let me start by discussing our fourth quarter financials in greater detail before introducing our outlook for the first quarter of '26 and fiscal year 2026. Total consolidated GAAP revenues were $207 million, decreasing 6.7% from $222 million for the same quarter last year. Included in total revenues were our company-owned restaurants net revenue of $203 million, which decreased 6.8% from $218 million for the prior year quarter. The decrease was primarily due to the change in the fiscal calendar, which resulted in a shift of New Year's Eve into fiscal year 2026. The impact of that shift accounts for approximately $5.7 million or 37% of the decrease. The remaining decrease is attributable to a 1.8% reduction in consolidated comparable sales and the closure of underperforming restaurants from the prior year period.
Management licensed franchise and incentive fee revenues decreased slightly to $4 million from $4.1 million in the prior year quarter. The decrease is primarily due to lower management license and incentive fee revenue at our managed STK restaurants in North America. It is important to note that sales of our managed STK in Las Vegas have notably improved quarter-to-date. Additionally, we exited our management deal with STK Scottsdale and converted a former RA Sushi to a company-owned STK in that same market.
Now turning to expenses. As Manny noted, we continue to implement targeted cost management initiatives. Last year, we made strategic adjustments to our beef tenderloin sourcing and have contracted pricing through September 2026, eliminating our exposure to significant U.S. beef price fluctuations and providing significant cost certainty. We also optimized our labor structure across the business last year by improving scheduling management, and we are still realizing synergies from the Benihana acquisition. Company-owned restaurant cost of sales as a percentage of company-owned restaurant net revenue improved 80 basis points to 19.6% from 20.4%. This improvement was primarily due to additional integration synergies from our Benihana acquisition and strategic cost management, including our beef pricing. Company-owned restaurant operating expenses as a percentage of company-owned restaurant net revenue was 61.5%, flat compared to the prior year quarter. This reflects our disciplined cost management despite sales deleverage, investments in marketing and general cost inflation.
Restaurant operating profit, excluding Grill Concepts restaurants closed or to be closed was $38.9 million or 19.5% of owned restaurant net revenue, improving by 10 basis points from 19.4% in the prior year quarter. On a total reported basis, general and administrative costs increased $1.3 million to $14.5 million from $13.3 million in the same quarter prior year, driven by increased marketing expenses. When adjusting for stock-based compensation of $1.1 million, adjusted general and administrative expenses were $13.4 million compared to $11.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2024. As a percentage of revenues, when adjusting for stock-based compensation, adjusted general and administrative costs were 6.5% compared to 5.3% in the prior year. Depreciation and amortization expense was $11 million compared to $11.4 million in the prior year quarter. This decrease reflects our disciplined capital allocation strategy.
During the quarter, we completed our regular assessment of the recoverability of the net book value of our fixed assets and intangible assets. A noncash impairment charge may be necessary when the net book value exceeds the future expected cash flows of the asset and can happen due to economic factors, end of lease or restaurant performance. As a result of this assessment, we identified 1 Kona Grill restaurant and the Kona Grill trade name that required impairment charges that totaled $7.2 million, primarily related to the Grill portfolio optimization. Preopening expenses were approximately $1.8 million, primarily related to the preopen rent for restaurants under development and payroll costs associated with the preopening training team as we prepare for restaurants scheduled to open in early 2026.
Preopening expenses decreased slightly by $200,000 compared to the prior year period. Operating income was $4.5 million compared to an operating income of $12.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2024. Annual adjusted operating income, a non-GAAP measure, increased 15.2% to $38 million from $33 million, primarily due to the additional periods of Benihana operations. For a reconciliation, please refer to our press release issued earlier today. Interest expense was $10.3 million compared to $10.5 million in the prior year quarter. Provision for income taxes was $600,000 compared to $100,000 in the prior year quarter. Net loss attributable to The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. was $6.4 million compared to net income of $1.6 million in the fourth quarter of 2024. The increase in net loss attributable to The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. was primarily driven by the noncash impairment charges of $7.2 million and exit costs associated with the Grill Concepts portfolio optimization.
Net loss available to common stockholders was $15.3 million or $0.49 net loss per share compared to $5.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2024 or $0.19 net loss per share. Adjusted EBITDA attributable to The ONE Group Hospitality was $28.1 million compared to $31 million in the prior year quarter, a decrease of 9.5%. We finished the quarter with $4.7 million in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash. We have $27.2 million available under our revolving credit facility. As of quarter end, we had $7 million outstanding on our revolving credit facility. Under current conditions, our term loan does not have a financial covenant.
Now I would like to provide some forward-looking commentary regarding our business. This commentary is subject to risks and uncertainties associated with the forward-looking statements as discussed in our SEC filings. We remind our investors that the actual number and timing of new restaurant openings for any given period is subject to factors outside of the company's control, including macroeconomic conditions, weather and factors under the control of landlords, contractors, licensees and regulatory and licensing authorities. Based on our information available now and our expectations as of today, we're also providing the following financial targets for fiscal year 2026. We project total GAAP revenues between $840 million and $855 million, which reflects our anticipation of consolidated comparable sales of 1% to 3%.
Management franchise and license revenues are expected to be between $14 million and $15 million; total company-owned operating expenses as a percentage of company-owned restaurant net revenue of approximately 82% to 83% and total general and administration costs, excluding stock-based compensation of approximately $53 million; adjusted EBITDA of between $100 million and $110 million, restaurant preopening expenses of between $5 million and $6 million, an effective income tax rate of approximately 10%; total capital expenditures, net of allowances received from landlords of between $38 million and $42 million. And finally, we plan to open 6 to 10 new venues.
I will now turn the call back to Manny.
Thank you, Nicole. Before we open up for questions, I want to emphasize how excited we are about the future of our business. Our future looks bright. With our strengthened portfolio and expanded franchise capabilities, we are well positioned to capture the significant opportunities ahead of us. We thank you for your continued support and look forward to sharing progress in the quarters ahead.
And as always, a special thanks to all our teammates all over the globe that live our mission every day, creating great guest memories by operating the best restaurant in every market that we operate in by delivering exceptional and unforgettable guest experiences to every guest every time. Nicole and I look forward to your questions. Operator?
[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Allison Arfstrom with Piper Sandler.
2. Question Answer
This is Allison on for Brian Mullan. Just wanted to ask about Benihana first. What are the strategic priorities there for the balance of this year?
Ali, our priority for Benihana right now continues to be marketing, working on digital, working on friends with benefits. So those are the primary strategies there. We've also continued to downsize the size of the menu. So continue to working on bringing a smaller sized menu. And then the other big piece continues to be operations and turn times and improving the -- frankly, just the turn times at the table and overall guest experience.
And the next question comes from Joe Gomes with NOBLE Capital.
Manny, I'm just wondering if you could just walk through a little bit here. When you -- third quarter call, you were optimistic about the fourth quarter. Obviously, you took the numbers down, the portfolio optimization and the calendar shift were known at the time you made your comments in the third quarter. So just trying to get a better feel when the consolidated comp sales improved by 4 percentage points during the quarter. What happened in the fourth quarter that I think the consensus numbers are more in the 220, 225 range for revenues and you guys came in at 207. What happened there?
Yes. I think -- thanks, Joe. I think we've talked about that when we have preannounced the fourth quarter sales in -- at the ICR conference. But I think probably the differential came mostly with -- we did -- although the quarter was better sequentially in same-store sales, we thought we could get more out of the Benihana brand, particularly with table turns and the fact that we were expecting to bring them down all the way down to around 90 minutes. And the table turns ended up being closer to about 100, 105 minutes. So we weren't able to achieve the full, I would say, synergies that we wanted to do on table turns. So part of that is just because we were really learning how to operate the brand, and we just want to make sure that we preserve guest experience and didn't compromise the guest experience in favor of the table turn. So it was more of our own internal strategy of holding out to great guest experiences, and we weren't able to get to those turn times that we've got at Benihana.
Okay. And you talked about in your prepared remarks today, some significant cost synergies still from the Benihana acquisition. And I was wondering maybe you could give us a little more color as to what they would be. One would have thought that over the past, what, 18 months or so, you would have gotten most of those synergies. So what else is available there? What size are we talking about of potential synergies from the Benihana acquisition that are left?
Yes. I mean, I think in the fourth quarter, you saw our COGS actually going sub 20%. So a really good mark for the company. And I think we've realized some of the initial synergies such as distribution, increasing our distribution sites, so synergy from distribution. I think we're still working on some of the finer points like, for instance, beef synergies in terms of getting bigger purchasing power. We've really been working on consolidating our beef purchases in the second half of last year. So I still think that there's some benefits of doing that. We've also consolidated a lot of other things that don't seem like a major thing, but like our rice purchases, and we changed our linen supplies and even our chemical supplies in the restaurants. So a lot of those things we work throughout 2025, but some of it actually was done in the third and fourth quarter last year.
So we think there is still some items that we will benefit for in 2026. And I think we talked in our prepared remarks about beef and our contracting of beef and how we went about. And that's one of the examples where we actually just leveraged from the fact that we have so much more tenderloin utilization as a combined company, we're able to leverage that actually to some very good and beneficial beef contracting.
Okay. And then just one more for me to get back in queue. Obviously, it's a situation that's totally in flux here. But given the recent world events, the significant increase in gas prices, have you seen any impact on traffic over the past couple of weeks? Or what are your kind of thoughts of how this potentially could be impact traffic going forward here for however long this happens to last?
Yes. I mean, obviously, so far, I mean, our guidance that we issued today kind of is based on what we've seen throughout the first quarter of this year. But obviously, gas and it's really how long it's going to go, right? It's really a function of the term of the price being up on gas. So we're still very early on that. We're maybe a week, 2 weeks into it. So we haven't seen an impact. And really, my ultimate answer on that is it all depends on how long it actually lasts.
And the next question comes from Anthony Lebiedzinski with Sidoti & Company.
Just wondering if you guys saw any notable regional differences in traffic. I heard that Las Vegas did better, which is encouraging. But any sort of commentary on any -- on the different regions that you operate in?
I mean in the fourth quarter, I think coming out of the third quarter, I think that we had a bit of a difference in California, Texas and Florida, I think we talked about that. I think going into the fourth quarter, I think some of those gaps narrowed. So we didn't see as big differential coming out of those states.
As it comes to Vegas specifically, I just -- I mean, I just want to make sure that our Vegas comment is on our experience. So we're not per se talking about the overall market situation in Las Vegas and the strip. But I think for us, we did change a little bit of our marketing in Vegas in terms of our strategy of marketing out more to the suburbs and emphasizing that. So I think that's actually helped us, and it's been good for us. But again, I think the geographical differences that we saw in the third quarter narrowed down in the fourth. And so they were less significant for us in the fourth quarter.
Got it. And then in terms of the expected same-store sales guidance for the full year, how are you thinking about the pricing or average ticket versus traffic? Are you looking at any additional price increases? Or do you think this will be more volume-driven in terms of the same-store sales gain that you're expecting?
Yes. I mean a great question. Right now, value is paramount. And so our next contemplated pricing action would be into the fourth quarter, like we usually do going into the holiday season. We don't have any short-term pricing actions planned right now. But of course, we always monitor what happens with the environment and what's going out there. As I just commented, there's still some uncertainty on gas prices and stuff. So I can't say that something isn't going to happen because of just the flux in the environment. But right now, we're only planning fourth quarter action on pricing.
Got you. Okay. And my last question, so you talked about the beef contracts. I was just wondering about other protein costs. How are you managing those? What's the outlook for that?
Yes. I mean, another good question. So we're coming off -- last year, we saw pressure on frozen seafood because of tariffs. And we have to move around some of our sourcing for shrimp and particularly shrimp. And I think coming off, I think the tariff environment might be more favorable for us. So we might be able to pick up some efficiency in the seafood, frozen seafood category. I think the rest of the -- of our commodity basket outside of beef and seafood will probably go with the market.
And the next question comes from Mark Smith with Lake Street Capital.
I wanted to dig a little bit more into some of the conversions. Can you give us just a little more insight into maybe the time line on openings of some of these conversions?
Yes. So right now, we have 5 restaurants that are closed that are in conversion mode. We are early construction on 1 or 2 of those right now. So our plan is to reopen them by July of 2026 of midyear plan to get them all back. They've all been designed. They're all in permitting. We were expediting. It's all going to really be determined by the permitting cycles on these and the actual construction cycle, we think, is going to be relatively short. So we're thinking maybe 6 to 8 weeks on the actual construction cycles. The only thing about when you converts to Benihana is we're converting with electrical tables and sometimes we do have to upgrade the electrical power for the property. So that could take another week to 2 weeks in the construction cycle. So I would say right now, our best projection on having them all back on would be July of this year.
Okay. And then just as we think about it, you've got really positive results from kind of initial conversion. I'm curious if there's anything that makes it maybe not repeatable with some of these other locations, just whether it's geography, footprint that you have. Just curious your thoughts around how repeatable some of these results are.
I mean, because these are always obviously forward-looking statements and how you're looking out. I think we obviously always have to say that what we think and what actually happens may be different. But we took a lot of care and diligence in making sure that the real estate that we are converting actually met our views on quality real estate for the concept. So I think we mentioned that we actually have to pulled one of them down just because we didn't think it met our criteria. So we were very selective on those. And I think the quality of the real estate that we're converting is super high quality. And some of it is RA's. And we knew when we acquired the brand that these sites work have already kind of scoped this kind of -- while this would have been a really good fill in the blank location. So we feel -- we generally feel really good about the quality of the real estate. But like I said, it's forward-looking and there's always risks with it, but it's a really good portfolio of real estate.
Excellent. And then the last one for me is just you talked about what sounds like some good momentum here around comps into Q1 being slightly positive here. Curious your thoughts on consumer behavior and what's kind of driving some of this comp strength? Is it -- how much of this is maybe price increases that were recently taken versus people just feeling better and maybe spending a little more or having more traffic?
Yes. I mean I think our sales momentum -- and again, it's been sequential. So this is like a continual building up on what we've done. I think it's really a function of the initiatives. And for us, it has been traffic. So value has been important. And I think we're now starting to really see the payback of continued focus on value. And then, of course, as I mentioned, Benihana is really an operational initiative in terms of working on the chef experience at the table. So I think these are things that are relatively directly correlated to our actions and plans.
I think in general, as we mentioned earlier, consumer confidence is still low, right? So it's not as if the confidence of the consumer has really shifted. It's more of value working in that environment as well as all the operations and marketing initiatives that we've done throughout the last, call it, 18 months. So it's more of an internal, I think, versus external impact on the sales. But as we mentioned earlier, we're super excited about the fact that we do have positive STK and positive Benihana working for us right now. And we've made significant improvement on just traffic at Benihana, I mean, at Kona Grill and RA. So we're feeling pretty optimistic about the year. As a matter of fact, our guidance for the full year does project that we feel that it can be a positive same-store sales year for us.
And the next question comes from Jim Sanderson with Northcoast Research.
I wanted to go back to your original comments about ideas to drive targeted traffic with product innovation. I think you've got the loyalty program. You also mentioned off-premises. I wonder if you could walk through how you plan to improve each of those opportunities and what that could generate for 2026?
Yes. I mean I think particularly on takeout and delivery, I think we're very early on potential there. I think we can really build that business up significantly. You're seen the product innovation on the Benihana side for takeout and delivery is we launched our version of Burritos, and that's done extremely well. So new products really can support the growth of that channel of business. And I think that's pretty exciting.
We also very early on loyalty. We rolled out our loyalty program in 2025, and we still very early getting organized with the program and learning how we can drive incremental traffic with the significant database of engaged guests that we have that. So we're very early on there. And then just in terms of product innovation, if you go to our restaurants, we're doing seasonal menus at all brands, including Benihana. So we've introduced products like Turkey on the holidays at Benihana, and we're -- have a significant amount of new ideas that we're introducing this year. So product innovation will continue to be a significant builder of the a la carte business for us. And then last but not least, we haven't talked about the event business, but the event business was very good for us in the fourth quarter of 2025, and we continue to invest in building that business up. As a matter of fact, we're now building infrastructure for Benihana, and we're starting to see some traction on actually marketing and selling group occasions at Benihana. So I think there's a whole new level of business that we can drive that way.
And I'm particularly excited in markets where we have an STK and the Benihana where somebody wants to do a big group event or -- and maybe they don't want to pay the STK price points. Now we're doing a lot more of packaging, a, maybe you can do the Benihana package, which is a little bit less of a price point. So we're starting to see some synergies, if you will, in convention cities at the L.A. of the world, even the Orlandos of the world, where maybe in Vegas where people may not be able to go all the way to the premium package with STK, and we're able to drive incremental sales with our other brands. So lots of excitement. So like you mentioned in execution table turns at Benihana continue to also be a big one for us. So we've got a lot of initiatives and strategies that we're working on to build same-store sales.
All right. I was wondering, did you benchmark what your sales mix for delivery or off-premises is right now and how that could improve over time?
I mean I think we're like in the low double digits as a percentage of total sales on takeout delivery. I think our internal stretch goals is to try to bring the whole business up to 20%. That's kind of like the big arrival moment. But we're really early, particularly on takeout delivery is we're not as sophisticated on curbside as some of our other competitors are. And so that's one of the challenges I have out to the team this year is to really evolve the takeout delivery business to become more curbside versus dependent on third party. And I think that can really open up a whole new long-term revenue generator for us. I mean I think that if I look now versus pre-COVID in terms of even STK as a brand on takeout and delivery, it's been incredible to see the growth on that business and particularly driving that has been our emphasis on the burger program.
All right. All right. Going back to your guidance for same-store sales for the year, the 1% to 3% positive, what's the price check baked into that forecast?
I think we have pricing right now around 5% to 6% for the whole year, and that's mostly coming out of the pricing that we did in the fourth quarter 2025, just rolling that out throughout the [indiscernible].
All right. So you'll be able to carry through that mid-single-digit pricing pretty much through the rest of the year until you get to fourth quarter and you can decide.
Correct. Exactly.
All right. I think you also have a guidance of about 100 to 200 basis points in store margin improvements on a consolidated basis. You've locked in, it sounds to me the bulk of your food costs are relatively stable. Is that primarily coming from sales leverage? And how does that change based on the way your sales grow or decline?
Yes. I mean I think a piece of that is just the portfolio, right, rotating the grills that helps the margin. And I think all the other items that you mentioned there, the purchasing, walking and purchasing, I also think that, as I mentioned earlier, frozen seafood will help us get there. So I think it's a combination of the synergies that we still haven't realized frozen seafood walks into the beef and as well as just the portfolio strategy that we've done will be the biggest reasons.
Just a question on your unit development. Are you satisfied with the Grill Concepts, the store count you've got now? Or do you think you'll have to continue to prune that over time?
I mean I think we -- I mean, I think we've kind of done the majority of the heavy lifting on that on the Grill. I think the ones that we have right now, they're specifically here because we've -- we really want to work that piece of the real estate. So we've kind of trimmed so far. And obviously, the only thing about the grills now is just as leases come up, we'll evaluate them on a single one. But I think all the onetime pruning and trimming has been done on the grills.
Okay. And how does that lease review process? Is that -- do you have a few every year? Or how should we look at that as far as the exposure to closures?
We have about 1 or 2 every single -- 1 or 2 that come up at current. And so it's just part of the natural end of the cycle for the leasing.
All right. And I just wanted a question on G&A. I think you're guiding to about $53 million. That's a bit of a step-up over prior year. Can you walk us through what's driving that dollar increase?
I mean I think that our bonuses this year are not as significant as we like them to be. And so this year, I think we're building into our guidance and our outlook that we will be on target with our guidance and objectives for the year.
All right. Last question for me. I just wanted to go back to the idea of eventually refinancing your debt. Any thoughts on change in philosophy, attitude about the potential there with respect to interest expense?
Working the balance sheet and creating shareholder value is always a top priority for us. And our revolver now is -- we've actually paid back the whole balance on the revolver. And so coming out of the year, our EBITDA, assuming that we were open for the whole 364 days is greater than $92 million. And on a run rate, it's even more significant than that. So we do have a very financeable base of EBITDA, and we'll be looking at opportunities. So creating shareholder value and improving the balance sheet always a key priority for us.
This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Manny Hilario for any closing remarks.
Thank you, sir. I appreciate everybody taking time to join us today. And as I always do, I want to thank our team again for, frankly, incredible performance throughout the fourth quarter and this year already. So I appreciate everybody's commitment to the business and what we're working on, and I look forward to seeing you all out in our restaurants. Everybody, have a great day. Thank you.
The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.
ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. — Q3 2025 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
[Audio Gap] New premium holiday menu focused on Wagyu and premium seafood, aligning with today's selective diners who are more intentional about what they choose to dine.
At Kona Grill, we are strategically expanding our menu to reduce reliance on categories facing current market pressures. The brand has historically been centered around seafood, sushi, and our distinctive bar experience, but we are seeing headwinds across those core areas.
Our menu diversification introduces broader culinary options that appeal to more frequent dining occasions and are less sensitive to economic fluctuations.
Our Friends with Benefits loyalty program continues to gain momentum with over 6.5 million members. During the quarter, we added over 200,000 new members.
Newly enrolled guests are showing the most repeat participation in the program. We are focused on growing a best-in-class program that fuels long-term business growth.
Our key objectives with the Friends with Benefits loyalty program are: one, maximize membership size by converting members from other TOG marketing programs; number two, drive organic sign-ups through increased awareness and engagement; and number three, increase member engagement within the program to strengthen brand connection and repeat visits.
We have also upgraded our brand websites, Benihana, STK, Kona Grill, and RA Sushi now feature fresh, mobile-optimized designs that are increasing both traffic and conversion rates.
These digital enhancements, combined with our loyalty platform, position us to compete effectively as national chains ramp up promotional activity.
Priority 2, capital-efficient growth. The newly redesigned Benihana location we opened in San Mateo, California, early this year has become the top-performing restaurant opening in the brand's 60-year history. This outstanding start validates the effectiveness of our redesigned restaurant format.
In this redesign, we made several meaningful changes to the Benihana footprint. We relocated the sushi station to the back of the house to create more Techniaki table capacity, expanded the bar seating area, modernized the interior with a brighter, more contemporary look, and created a dedicated takeout station that improves overall restaurant flow.
We are now implementing this learning system-wide, adding 2 to 3 Techniaki tables per restaurant to create meaningful capacity increases that directly boost revenue potential.
This success gives us confidence that future locations can achieve $8 million in annual sales with a restaurant-level profit margin in the mid-20% range.
Franchise momentum continues to accelerate. We opened our second Benihana Express location in Miami in the second quarter, with more in development.
The Express format offers the full menu without Techniaki tables, generating strong franchise interest while enabling asset-light expansion. Over time, we expect franchise licenses and managed locations to represent over 60% of our total footprint.
We are also expanding Benihana into more nontraditional venues. We currently operate in 3 professional sports stadiums, generating 9 million fan impressions annually, with additional airport and arena opportunities under discussion.
Across our portfolio, we have opened 4 company-owned venues and 1 franchise location year-to-date, with additional fourth quarter openings planned, bringing our total 2025 openings to 5 to 7 new venues.
In the fourth quarter, we already opened an STK in Scottsdale, Arizona, and plan to open a company-owned STK in Oak, Illinois, and our Kona Grill San Antonio relocation.
Relocations remain a key strategy to unlock strong returns in existing markets. By prioritizing nearby high-quality real estate opportunities in areas that already embrace our brands, we can increase capacity, optimize traffic, and better position our brands for long-term success.
For example, our recently relocated Westwood STK has delivered margin improvement over the previous location. Remodels are also showing promise and success.
During the third quarter, we remodeled our dated Tampa Bay Kona Grill. With modest capital investment, it has delivered a significant turnaround in same-store sales performance.
Priority 3, portfolio optimization. We have taken decisive action to strengthen our portfolio quality through strategic location optimization. After conducting a thorough evaluation of our Grill concepts portfolio, we closed 6 underperforming locations in the second quarter and 1 additional location in the third quarter within challenging trade areas.
These were primarily older units, which would have required substantial capital investment. Looking ahead, we have identified up to 9 additional Grill locations to convert to either Benihana or STK formats through the end of 2026.
These conversions represent an excellent capital allocation opportunity. They require about $1 million in capital investments, and the average STK generates over $1 million in annual EBITDA.
Our first conversion of a RA Sushi location to an STK location has already happened in Scottsdale, Arizona, which opened at the end of October. After completing all planned conversions, we will operate all profitable locations that we expect to generate approximately $10 million in restaurant-level EBITDA and over $100 million in revenue, with all units maintaining positive cash flow.
Priority 4, balance sheet strength. With approximately $45 million in liquidity, we have the means to invest in growth while maintaining discipline.
Our Board authorized a $5 million share repurchase program last year, and we view our stock as an attractive investment. Additionally, we expect to further reduce discretionary capital expenditures in the coming year across all of our brands, allowing us to strengthen our balance sheet while enhancing financial flexibility.
Finally, I'm optimistic about our fourth quarter. This is historically our strongest period, and we are better positioned than ever to capitalize on that strength.
2024 marked our first holiday season with Benihana in the portfolio, and we set records across every holiday with exceptional demand. This year, we have made targeted investments to capture even greater holiday demand.
Our enhanced reservation technology, streamlined operational flow, and comprehensive team training initiatives position us to execute flawlessly during our busiest periods.
A key operational focus is optimizing Benihana table efficiency. We are targeting a reduction from 120 minutes to 90 minutes table turns throughout the fourth quarter, which will significantly expand our capacity to serve more guests during the busy dinner periods.
The items that I have outlined today are fundamentally execution-driven and within our direct control. We are not relying on macroeconomic recovery or waiting for consumer sentiment shifts.
Instead, we are focused on strategic initiatives that position us to deliver strong results regardless of broader economic trends. Before I turn it over to Nicole for the financial details, I want to thank our teammates.
Every day, they live our mission of creating great guest memories by operating the best restaurants in every market that we operate by delivering exceptional and unforgettable guest experiences to every guest every time.
They are at the foundation of everything we do. With that, I'll turn it over to Nicole.
Thank you, Manny. As a reminder, beginning this year, we are reporting financial information on a fiscal quarter basis using 4 13-week quarters with the addition of the 53rd week when necessary.
For 2025, our fiscal calendar began on January 1, 2025, and will end on December 28, 2025, and our third quarter contained 91 days. Let me start by discussing our third-quarter financials in greater detail before updating our outlook for 2025.
Total consolidated GAAP revenues were $180.2 million, decreasing 7.1% from $194 million for the same quarter last year. Included in total revenues were our company-owned restaurants' net revenue of $177.4 million, which decreased 6.9% from $190.6 million for the prior year quarter.
The decrease was primarily due to a 5.9% reduction in consolidated comparable sales and the closure of underperforming restaurants from the prior year period.
Management license, franchise, and incentive fee revenues decreased to $2.8 million from $3.4 million in the prior year. The decrease is attributed to lower management license and incentive fee revenue at our managed STK restaurants in North America and reduced franchisee revenues due to exiting 2 license agreements.
It is important to note that our sales at our managed STK in Las Vegas have notably improved quarter-to-date. Additionally, we exited our management deal with STK Scottsdale and converted a former RA Sushi to a company-owned STK.
Now turning to expenses. We continue to implement targeted cost management initiatives, including strategic adjustments to our protein sourcing to reduce costs and a temporary hiring freeze that will optimize our labor structure.
Company-owned restaurant's cost of sales as a percentage of the company-owned restaurant's net revenue increased slightly to 21.1% from 20.9%. This was primarily due to sales deleveraging, coupled with higher-than-anticipated inflation in certain commodity costs.
This was partially offset by additional integration synergies from our Benihana acquisition. Company-owned restaurant operating expenses as a percentage of company-owned restaurant net revenue increased 140 basis points to 67.6% from 66.2% in the prior year quarter.
This was primarily due to investments in marketing, general cost inflation, and fixed cost deleveraging driven by a decrease in same-store sales.
Restaurant operating profit decreased to $20.1 million or 11.3% of owned restaurant net revenue compared to $24.5 million or 12.8% in the prior year quarter.
On a total reported basis, general and administration costs increased $0.5 million to $13.3 million from $12.8 million in the same quarter prior year, driven by increased marketing expenses.
When adjusting for stock-based compensation of $1.2 million, adjusted general and administrative expenses were $12 million compared to $11.2 million in the third quarter of 2024.
As a percentage of revenues, when adjusting for stock-based compensation, adjusted general and administrative costs were 6.7% compared to 5.8% in the prior year.
Depreciation and amortization expenses were $11.5 million compared to $9.4 million in the prior year quarter. The increase was primarily related to depreciation and amortization of new venues and capital expenditures to maintain and enhance the guest experience in our restaurants.
During the quarter, we completed our regular assessment of the recoverability of the net book value of our fixed assets. A noncash loss on impairment may be necessary when the net book value exceeds the future expected cash flows of the restaurant, and can happen due to economic factors, end of lease, or restaurant performance.
As a result of this assessment, we identified 5 restaurants that required impairment charges that totaled $3.4 million, mostly related to grills that we plan not to extend the leases on.
Preopening expenses were approximately $700,000, primarily related to the preopening rent for restaurants under development and payroll costs associated with the preopening training team as we prepare restaurants scheduled to open in the fourth quarter of 2025.
Preopening expenses decreased $1.4 million compared to the prior year period. Operating loss was $7.9 million compared to an operating loss of $3.6 million in the third quarter of 2024, mostly impacted by the $3.4 million in noncash loss on impairment.
Interest expense was $10.5 million compared to $10.7 million in the prior year quarter. Provision for income taxes was $59.1 million compared to a benefit of $4.9 million in the prior year quarter.
The increase in income tax expense is primarily the result of the establishment of a full valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets during the third quarter.
This is a noncash income tax expense item that was recorded because of management's assessment of the future usability of our deferred tax assets and liabilities.
Net loss attributable to Wes Hospitality was $76.7 million compared to a net loss of $9.3 million in the third quarter of 2024. The 2025 loss was primarily driven by the noncash loss on impairment and the noncash recognition of the valuation allowance.
Net loss available to common shareholders was $85.3 million or $2.75 net loss per share, compared to $16.4 million in the third quarter of 2024 or $0.53 net loss per share.
The previously discussed noncash loss on impairment and establishment of the deferred tax asset valuation allowance represent $2.02 of the third quarter 2025 net loss per share.
Adjusted EBITDA attributable to The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. was $10.6 million compared to $14.9 million in the prior year, a decrease of 28.9%.
We finished the quarter with $6 million in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash. We have $28.7 million available under our revolving credit facility.
And as of quarter end, we had $5.5 million outstanding on our revolving credit facility. Under current conditions, our term loan does not have a financial covenant.
Now I would like to provide some forward-looking commentary regarding our business. This commentary is subject to risks and uncertainties associated with forward-looking statements as discussed in our SEC filings.
We remind our investors that the actual number and timing of new restaurant openings for any given period are subject to factors outside of the company's control, including macroeconomic conditions, weather, and factors under the control of landlords, contractors, licensees, and regulatory and licensing authorities.
Based on the information available now and our expectations as of today, we are updating the following financial targets for fiscal year 2025. Please note, this does not include the potential impact of tariffs on broader economic conditions.
We project total GAAP revenues of between $820 million and $825 million, which reflects our anticipation of consolidated comparable sales of negative 3% to negative 2%.
Managed franchise and license fee revenues are expected to be between $14 million and $15 million. Total company-owned operating expenses as a percentage of company-owned restaurant net revenue of approximately 83.5%.
Total G&A, excluding stock-based compensation of approximately $46 million, adjusted EBITDA of between $95 million and $100 million, restaurant preopening expenses of between $5 million and $6 million; an effective income tax rate of between 1% and 4% when excluding the valuation allowance and the items subject to valuation allowance.
Total capital expenditures, net of allowances received from landlords, of between $45 million and $50 million. And finally, we plan to open 5 to 7 new venues. I will now turn the call back to Manny.
Thank you, Nicole. Before we open it up for questions, I want to emphasize how excited we are about the future of our business.
Although the current environment is challenging, our future looks bright. With our strengthened portfolio and our expanded franchise capabilities, we are well-positioned to capture the significant opportunities ahead of us.
We thank you for your continued support and look forward to sharing our progress in the quarters ahead. Nicole and I look forward to your questions. Operator?
[Operator Instructions]
We'll take our first question from Joe Gomes with NOBLE Capital.
2. Question Answer
So I want to start out the last couple of quarters, you talked about Benihana having 2 quarters in a row of same-store sales growth, in STK 3 quarters in a row of positive traffic.
And I might have missed it, but I didn't hear that discussion today. I was wondering if you could give us a little update on those.
I mean, I think probably the best thing to do is talk about maybe our traffic overall as a company. I think if I look at the third quarter, 2025, I think that's been our best quarter in traffic, actually, for the whole year.
As a consolidated company, I think we were down 6.9% in traffic for the third quarter, whereas in the second quarter, we were down 7.5%. And in Q1, we're down 7.8%.
So the third quarter this year was by far our best or better traffic quarter. The big difference for us in the third quarter, though, is that until the end of the second quarter, beginning of the third quarter, we had about 7% effective pricing in there.
So that offset part of the traffic experience that we were having. And then, going into the middle of the third quarter around August, we began lapping some pricing from last year.
And we just saw a lot of noise in the middle of August in traffic. So we decided to just hold off on the pricing. And so our pricing in the third quarter was only plus 4% for the quarter.
So we effectively lost about 3 points of pricing in the third quarter. So I would say from my perspective or our perspective, we made significant or we're doing improvements on traffic, which is one of the reasons why going into the fourth quarter, and we put some pricing in effect right at the beginning of November, I think that we've basically put the pricing back on.
And with the sequential improvement in traffic, I think we feel pretty good about the sales position going into the fourth quarter.
And what do you think is driving the traffic improvement in the fourth quarter so far?
On the third quarter, I'd say the sequential improvement in the third quarter, I think, is really a testament to the value of the proposition and the marketing that we've been doing.
We also, as I mentioned in my prepared statements, we do have some macro forces that haven't really supported sales. For instance, if you look at our across of our portfolio, our concentrations of restaurants are in California, Arizona, Florida, and Texas, and then we have the other, which is about 50% of our concentration of sales.
And if I just look in the third quarter alone, I think there was a lot of macro pressures, for instance, in our California sales sequential between the second and third quarter actually got negative by 7 points.
So there's some geographical pressures that came in that quarter since the third quarter. We've seen some of that loosen up a little bit, but certainly in September, we saw a lot more pressure in our traffic in California, which is, by the way, one of the reasons why we put the pause on our pricing actions, just because we saw the traffic in there.
So again, I think that the combination of the sequential improvement in traffic in the quarters, and now I feel as if California is getting slightly better.
And last but not least, as I mentioned also in my prepared statement, in the month of December, taking the turn times at Benihana from 120 minutes to 90 minutes creates a significant lift in availability and tables, and capacity to take more business.
And then one more for me, if I could sneak one in. Maybe just can you give us a little color on your efforts on the Benihana franchising side.
I know that's something that you're hoping to see a little faster growth. So just want to get an update there.
Yes. So I mean, we did open one in the second quarter in Florida. And then our activities on the franchising side have also yielded. We now have a deal that's almost done for some Benihana Express-type operations in California.
We also have a potential franchise deal for the Bay Area that's also shaping up. So we've made significant improvements on the pipeline. So now our team is out there working with these potential individuals and closing these deals down.
We've also made some improvements to our pipeline for license sites for STK. So we do have both the franchising move forward on the pipeline for Benihana and also STK, as we've gotten some more leads and are actually getting very close to announcing some additional license deals for STK.
We'll take our next question from Anthony Lebiedzinski with Sidoti.
So Manny, I think also last quarter, you called out Las Vegas as being a market where you saw some, I think, softness. Can you comment on that? Did you see that as well? And have you seen any improvements fourth quarter to date?
Yes. So I will caveat my response on Vegas on the fact that it's our experience. We only have, let's call it, 3 or 4 restaurants in that market, actually 4 in total.
But our experience right now with STK is that it's actually improving for STK. So we've seen an improvement in our business on that side. Again, as I mentioned earlier, part of that has to do with the shifting in the conference and convention schedule.
I think if you follow Vegas, you probably are aware that there was a shift in the convention calendar. So that's definitely benefiting us in the fourth quarter, having a more robust conference schedule.
I think the other restaurants, though, I would say that it's more of a little bit of a mixed bag. So I haven't seen the same improvement that I've seen on the STK business.
And then you gave us some numbers on the loyalty program, which looks like it's doing well in terms of sign-ups. Can you give us maybe some details, as far as like what the average ticket or frequency or anything else, can you share about the loyalty members versus non-loyalty members? What do you see in terms of behavior from them?
Yes, great question. So we have about 6.5 million people who are in the program. A lot of those members came through our conversion of memberships from other programs.
So we have Benihana on the programs. We had Kona Grill Rock. And that's the case. So we brought everybody into the same common program, if you will, into that loyalty program. And since then, we've done about 200,000 sign-ups of new members coming into the program. We're early.
So I'm going to give you what I've seen so far because of all the brands we have, Kona Grill is the one that has been on the loyalty program much longer than anyone else because we were already utilizing Konivor, which was the legacy program from Kona.
And for that particular brand, it's actually been helpful. So we've seen a frequency increase in the use of the program. So we feel the early returns are very promising because we have members in that program who've been around for longer.
And I think the new program and new activations that we're doing with it have driven a little bit more interest. But again, as I said earlier, it's early. I think we rolled it out only earlier this year.
I think that we will continue to pick up momentum with it going forward. But again, I think that as I look at the overall story for the quarter, I think that the third quarter being our best traffic quarter for the company, I think it bodes well for all the initiatives and the actions that we're taking with marketing and everywhere else.
And then I guess my last question before I pass it on to others. In terms of recent price increases, I know it's still early on, but any early read on the reaction to the price increases?
Have you seen any customer pushback to those higher prices? Or do you think that you'll be able to successfully pass those along?
Yes. I mean, I think we start rolling out those price increases in late October in some places. And so we're really, really early on it. But, again, I think the way that we did our pricing increase this time is that we really tried to wait until we think the timing is a little better.
I think this has actually started our seasonally better months, weeks, whatever you want to call it, actually, for the next 36 weeks is really our high season period for us.
So I think putting the price right at the beginning of the high season is actually a good strategy for us. Have we seen any noise in terms of feedback? The answer is not. We follow it obviously through all our listening tools and social media, and everything.
So we have not seen anything above and beyond what we usually see on the pricing.
We'll take our next question from Mark Smith with Lake Street Capital Markets.
I wanted to dig in a little bit more into Benihana comps here in the quarter. They came down more than we've seen here recently.
Can you just talk about traffic and tickets at Benihana?
Yes. I think for the quarter for Benihana, as I mentioned earlier, that we had pricing coming off.
Benihana was the one that had 5 points of pricing might have actually been a little higher than 5 points that we did not replace in the quarter. So if I look at their differential in same-store sales year-to-date to what we performed in the third quarter, I would attribute it mostly to the pricing, not taking the pricing action.
And again, I want to reiterate this, if I look at our same-store sales by geography, California was by far the most impacted of all markets in our portfolio, and the Benihana portfolio does have a bit of weight in the California market, some of our higher-volume restaurants.
So again, I think that I would say that the 2 items on the Benihana would be not replacing the 5 points in pricing that we came off and then the additional pressure in the California market.
And then just on the impairment that you took in the quarter, was all of that on Grill Concepts? Or was there anything on any of the other brands?
Yes. I think the majority of the impact was on Kona Grill. And then we did have a very minor amount coming out of our STK in downtown New York just because that lease is up.
We're in the last year of that lease, and we're moving the restaurants, actually relocating the restaurant around the corner. So that will be a reload.
But right now, we just have some additional amounts in the books that we have to accelerate. And by the way, there were assets that we couldn't move over to the new location because a lot of the assets may move to the new location.
And then just talking about changing locations here. Can you just walk us through a little bit more on your, maybe the economics of the conversions? I think you said $1 million maybe on spend, but just the economics there and then, maybe your outlook on these that you plan on converting, how many maybe to STK, how many to Benihana.
And I'm curious, sorry to throw a lot on you here. Do these come with a new lease signing? Or do you typically keep the lease terms that you currently have?
Well, so a very good question. So the first one we did is Scottsdale. It was a RA Sushi restaurant. And in that one, we converted to an STK.
It took us, I think, from beginning to end, somewhere between 6 and 8 weeks, to do the full conversion. The cost of the conversion, I'm putting it at about $1 million in a round number.
And it was a very effective refurbishing of the restaurant, and we kept the majority of all the infrastructure. So it was very cost-effective in that. And the question on the lease is that one, actually, we actually got an extension on the lease by choice.
So we got another 5-year option just because we like the real estate. When you go to that property, you'll notice that it's in an A plus, I'm going to call it A, I'm not going to give it A+, but let's call it A real estate with very good lease terms and a good presence there.
And we've already reopened it. I would say that we just opened the door. We didn't really do much marketing. We're actually starting the marketing push in the next couple of weeks.
And I've been so far been very happy with what it's happened there. Obviously, as you know, our model for STK, brand-new STK, is about $8 million in volume with margins around 20%.
So I would expect that STK to be in that range of value. It's in a market that we've already been in. So we have pretty good experience there. So I feel pretty good about that one.
Now we have other, I think, up to 9 other sites that we're looking at converting and the cost should be around that same $1 million type tag, if you will, price tag and the conversion cycle should be relatively fast, and we'll do the same thing in terms of taking advantage of existing infrastructure in electrical, HVAC, kitchen, plumbing, et cetera.
So we think those will be very effective. Again, what really drives that decision is the quality of the real estate. That's one of the things that we're really happy about, The ONE Group is we have great real estate, and that's one of the things that having multi-brands like we do gives us a lot of flexibility and gives us an opportunity to really leverage the strength in the real estate.
Would there be much of a difference in the cost or maybe return metrics on converting to Benihana versus STK?
I mean, again, another great question. I think the difference between Benihana and STK conversion is actually the mechanical cost because with the tables in the dining room, we have to do more upgrading on the exhaust system, and sometimes electrical systems if we add electrical tables.
So it's a little bit more on the mechanical side. And it may take a little bit more time because we actually have a lot more engineering and architectural work into it. So it's a little bit different from a process. But our view on it is that the cost will still be around $1 million in either one.
And so we don't foresee a lot of cost incrementality in there. Again, I mean, we have a lot of real estate in malls and other places that make a lot more sense for Benihana than STK.
So that's part of our decision on Benihana is that Benihana is a great concept for mall-type locations.
We'll take our next question from Jim Sanderson with Northcoast Research.
I wanted to go back to the issue of pricing. I think you mentioned you exited the third quarter with a global price of about 4 percentage points and that you took a price in November. What should we expect as far as the impact of menu price on fourth-quarter same-store sales?
So I think the bigger part of that increase was Benihana around slightly above 5 points on pricing. So that will weigh in heavily. And then STK and the other brands, we had about 2 to 3 points on pricing.
So the other ones are very modest. I would call that just cleanup pricing. So I would say, overall, somewhere around 4.5% to 5.5% on a weighted basis would be the impact of the new pricing layer.
And that probably will last for the next 36 weeks, give or take. Is that the right way to look at that?
That's right.
Could you talk a little bit more about bookings? I think you mentioned in the press release that you were optimistic given the level of holiday bookings.
Maybe you can tell us any comparison with respect to last year at this time?
Yes. I mean, we actually just reviewed the books this morning. Nicole and I did a review of our bookings to progress right now.
Frankly, since COVID, if I look at the month of November, looking into December has been one of the months where I've actually seen a significant amount of progress on the number of bookings that we've seen in events.
Obviously, that also reflects a little bit of the fact that we have a very experienced. We have a very good sales team. So that team has become very good at working in the current environment of sales.
And again, the convention business and a lot of the stuff that used to happen in the third quarter last year also got moved into the fourth quarter this year. So definitely, that helps bring up the books into the fourth quarter.
And can you remind us what share of the fourth quarter is related to holiday bookings or special events, that type of thing?
I would say about 15% of our business comes from the group event business in the fourth quarter.
Also wanted to shift gears on Benihana. You mentioned a lot of changes taking place in the design of the store that you're going to be implementing.
Can you give us a sense of when that change will be implemented across all Benihana stores? And any feedback on helping us understand how to quantify the increased capacity, how that potentially could benefit AUVs?
So our planning for that is we typically say that our CapEx is about 1.5% to 2.5% of sales on existing stores.
So we're not putting together a special allocation of capital for that. We will do that revamp within our typical allocated basket, if you will, of CapEx. And so it will take a little bit of time to do that. But our changes will be more around our priority, one is getting rid of the smoke in the dining room.
So we do have some things that can help with that. So we're working on that right now for a lot of our restaurants. HVAC. I think I've mentioned HVAC in previous calls. And then the third priority is adding tables because on Fridays and Saturdays, we can really use more tables in the restaurants.
So we'll be upping those tables as we go. And then I'd say the next level of priority, things like the artwork, is pretty compelling. The new artwork that we put in the San Mateo location, which we've defined for the brand, is actually very cool. So we really want to start working on that.
And then over time, it's just the key with Benihana is to continue a very strong maintenance program, which we do have in place. We have a very high-quality facilities team that keeps these things maintained.
But as time goes on, with our typical basket of capital, we'll try to take care of that. As you probably picked up on my prepared statements and on the press release, we're also tightening down and keeping down the amount of CapEx that we're using because we want to work on the balance sheet.
So it's all about balancing all those things, and that's where we'll fund the capital B from our regular CapEx basket.
A bit of a follow-up question, just to make sure I understood the lower CapEx in 2026 that you mentioned. So, how should we put that into perspective based on the plan you have in place this year? How is that CapEx number going to change.
Yes, very good question. So we're focusing our capital on the conversions, which are about $1 million per restaurant. And then on new brand restaurants of the world, we're only focusing on restaurants that we can do for $1.5 million or less on the whole cost of the restaurant.
So we're really working our low-cost real estate inventory. And also the other thing, too, is we're not doing any new leases right now because we have a pipeline of about 12 leases. So we stopped doing leasing, and we're going to work through the existing pipeline of leases.
And last question for me. I just wanted to better understand the Benihana Express. I think you mentioned that it could eventually become a sizable portion of your portfolio. Can you describe any changes to what the AUVs are store margins and how that's different from, let's say, a larger Benihana?
Yes. I mean, the box will be much smaller. So we're trying to keep the restaurant -- let's just hypothetically right now, keep it around 1,000 square feet.
So the economics are different from a top-line perspective just because of size. And then there will be no tips on tables in the property. All the food will be ordered and picked up, and taken away. And then we'll have some tables in the property and chairs, but there will be very limited seating. And so it will be a much smaller compact box. And so expect revenues.
Right now, Nicole and I talked about somewhere around $1 million to $1.5 million, but a very, very low cost of build-out because there's nothing really to put in there. So we'll probably build that for around $500,000 to $600,000 in cost. So it will be a very effective box. Think of it most as a fast casual grab-and-go, take your food back home, or you may choose to eat there, but it will be a more casual environment.
Just to follow up on that. How do we look at the cash return or the cash-on-cash return to franchisees with be reviewing?
Yes. I mean, we think that because of the lower cost of goods and the fact that we'll be able to be effective labor in that box, it will be a very high ROI.
I think the store level margins, even after royalties, can be in the 15% to 20% range. So it will be a very good return vehicle for potential franchisees.
The ones that we're talking to are super excited about it, and we look forward to testing that model out.
We have reached our allotted time for questions. I will now turn the call back over to Manny Hilario. Please go ahead.
All right. Thank you very much, Brittany. As I always close my call here. I want to thank the team once again. I'm very impressed and very pleased as to how the team put above and beyond effort and really showed progress in the third quarter, as our traffic numbers show.
So I appreciate that. And we look forward to a great fourth quarter in terms of traffic and sales. And as always, I appreciate your support of The ONE Group, and I look forward to seeing you out in one of our restaurants. Everybody, have a great day.
Thank you. This brings us to the end of today's meeting. We appreciate your time and participation. You may now disconnect.
Financial data from ONE Group Hospitality, Inc.
Revenue
Revenue is the sum of all sales generated by a company, e.g. for its products or services.
Revenue (TTM) metric explainedDirect Costs
Direct costs are the costs incurred directly in connection with the manufacture of the product or service.
Gross Profit
Gross Profit indicates how much of the revenue remains in the company after deducting direct production costs. If the percentage share of sales is calculated, this is referred to as the gross margin.
Gross Profit metric explainedSelling and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) include all expenses for marketing and sales as well as the general administration of the company.
Research and Development Expense
Research and development costs (R&D) provide information on how much the company invests in the research and development of its products. The costs are particularly interesting as a percentage of revenue and in comparison to direct competitors.
EBITDA
EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization) is the company's earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. The EBITDA margin is calculated as a percentage of sales.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation represents reductions in the value of the company's assets (e.g. due to wear and tear on machinery).
EBIT (Operating Income)
EBIT (Earnings Before Interest and Taxes) is the company's profit before interest and taxes, also known as the operating income. The EBIT Margin is calculated as a percentage of sales at
.
Net Profit
Net Profit represents the profit or loss after deduction of all costs.
Net Profit metric explainedStocksGuide Premium
| Jun '26 |
+/-
%
|
||
| Revenue | 801 801 |
4%
4%
100%
|
|
| - Direct Costs | 156 156 |
8%
8%
20%
|
|
| Gross Profit | 644 644 |
3%
3%
80%
|
|
| - Selling and Administrative Expenses | 64 64 |
10%
10%
8%
|
|
| - Research and Development Expense | - - |
-
-
|
|
| EBITDA | 81 81 |
8%
8%
10%
|
|
| - Depreciation and Amortization | 44 44 |
6%
6%
5%
|
|
| EBIT (Operating Income) EBIT | 37 37 |
20%
20%
5%
|
|
| Net Profit | -119 -119 |
157%
157%
-15%
|
|
In millions USD.
Don't miss a Thing! We will send you all news about ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. directly to your mailbox free of charge.
If you wish, we will send you an e-mail every morning with news on stocks of your portfolios.
ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. Stock News
Company Profile
The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. engages in the development, owning, and management of restaurants and lounges. It operates through the following segments: STK, Kona Grill, ONE Hospitality and Corporate. The STK segment consists of the results of operations from STK restaurant locations, competing in the full-service dining industry, as well as management, license. The Kona Grill segment includes the results of operations of Kona Grill restaurant location. The ONE Hospitality segment is comprised of the management, license and incentive fee revenue and results of operations generated from its other brands and venue concepts, which include ANGEL, Bagatelle, Heliot, Hideout, Marconi, and Radio. The Corporate segment consists of general and administrative costs, stock-based compensation, depreciation and amortization, acquisition related gains and losses, pre-opening expenses, lease termination expenses, transaction costs, and other income and expenses. The company was founded by Jonathan Segal on December 3, 2004 and is headquartered in Denver, CO.
StocksGuide Premium
| Head office | United States |
| CEO | Mr. Hilario |
| Employees | 9,500 |
| Founded | 2004 |
| Website | togrp.com |


