SAF Holland Stock price
Compare with Peer Group
📊 Peer Group
📈 What is it?
The peer group consists of the companies with the most similar business model. They serve as a benchmark for putting a stock into context.
🧮 How is it selected?
Based on similarity of business model, meaning companies from the same industry with comparable products and a similar customer base. That's the only way to compare apples to apples.
🏛️ Why does it matter?
Whether a stock is cheap or expensive is best judged by comparison. A P/E of 18 or an EV/FCF of 20 can look cheap or expensive depending on the yardstick. The peer group gives you the most accurate one: companies with a similar business model that operate under the same conditions.
🎯 What does it mean for investors?
When a metric sits below the peer average, the stock is valued more cheaply relative to its competitors, and above the average more expensively. A discount to the peer group can be an opportunity, but it can also have a reason (for example lower growth). The comparison is a starting point, not a verdict.
Is SAF Holland a Top Scorer Stock based on the Dividend, High-Growth-Investing or Leverman Strategy?
As a Free StocksGuide user, you can view scores for all 9,127 stocks worldwide.
StocksGuide Premium
StocksGuide Unlimited
Key metrics
📘 Market Capitalization
📈 What is it?
Market capitalization shows how much a company is currently worth on the stock market.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It helps classify companies by size (Large, Mid, Small Cap) and indicates their market presence and relative stability.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Large-cap companies tend to be more stable, often pay dividends, but may grow more slowly.
- Smaller firms may offer higher growth potential but come with more volatility.
- Market capitalization is a useful indicator of company size — but not a measure of whether a stock is undervalued or overvalued.
📘 Enterprise Value (EV)
📈 What is it?
Enterprise Value represents the total cost to acquire a company — including its debt and excluding its cash reserves.
🧮 How is it calculated?
(= Market Cap + Net Debt)
🏛️ Why is it important?
EV gives a more complete picture of a company's value than market cap alone and is used in key valuation ratios like EV/FCF or EV/Sales.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Enterprise Value shows the true cost of buying a company, including all financial obligations.
- It is more accurate than just looking at market cap, especially when comparing companies with different levels of debt or cash.
- Professional investors prefer EV-based multiples because they better reflect the company’s full financial footprint.
📘 Net Debt
📈 What is it?
Net Debt shows how much debt remains after subtracting a company’s available cash reserves.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It indicates how dependent a company is on borrowed money and how easily it can service its debt in the short term.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Low or negative net debt signals financial strength and flexibility.
- Companies with strong cash positions are better positioned in crises.
- High net debt increases financial risk — especially in environments with rising interest rates or economic downturns.
📘 Cash
📈 What is it?
Cash represents all liquid assets a company can access immediately — including cash, bank deposits, and short-term investments.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It reflects a company’s financial flexibility and resilience — enabling investments, buybacks, or buffer in downturns.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A strong cash position means greater room for maneuver and crisis resistance.
- Cash-rich companies can invest, pay down debt, or repurchase shares.
- But excess idle cash might indicate a lack of growth opportunities.
📘 Shares Outstanding
📈 What is it?
Shares outstanding represent the total number of a company’s shares currently held by investors — excluding treasury stock.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It’s the basis for key metrics like Earnings Per Share (EPS), Market Capitalization, or the Price/Earnings ratio (P/E).
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Fewer shares in circulation typically increase earnings per share — making each share more valuable.
- Share buybacks reduce the number of shares and boost per-share metrics.
- Issuing new shares does the opposite — diluting shareholder value and lowering per-share figures.
📘 Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E)
📈 What is it?
The P/E ratio shows how many times a company's earnings per share are reflected in its current share price — in other words, how "expensive" the stock appears relative to its profits.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
The P/E ratio is one of the most widely used valuation metrics. It helps investors assess whether a stock appears cheap or expensive compared to its earnings power.
🧮 Calculation
📊 P/E (TTM) = Based on earnings from the last 12 months (Trailing Twelve Months):🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low P/E may indicate undervaluation — or signal underlying issues.
- A high P/E may reflect strong growth expectations — or an overvalued stock.
📘 Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S)
📈 What is it?
The P/S ratio shows how much investors are paying for $1 of the company’s revenue – regardless of profitability.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
P/S is especially useful for evaluating growth companies or businesses not yet profitable. It reflects how the market values the company’s sales.
🧮 Calculation
Market Cap = €998.67m | Revenue (TTM) = €1.75b
Market Cap = €998.67m | Estimated Revenue = €1.83b
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low P/S may indicate undervaluation — or low profitability.
- A high P/S can reflect strong growth expectations — or excessive optimism.
- Especially helpful when evaluating companies where profits are low, volatile, or negative.
📘 Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales)
📈 What is it?
EV/Sales shows how much investors are paying for $1 of revenue — considering not just equity, but also debt and cash. It’s the capital structure–adjusted version of the P/S ratio.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It’s ideal for comparing companies with different levels of debt. It reflects a company's true cost relative to its revenue.
🧮 Calculation
Enterprise Value = €1.50b | Revenue (TTM) = €1.75b
Enterprise Value = €1.50b | Forward Revenue = €1.83b
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- EV/Sales allows for capital structure–neutral company comparisons.
- A lower ratio may indicate undervaluation; a higher one may signal strong growth expectations or overvaluation.
- Especially helpful when evaluating high-growth companies with low or negative earnings.
📘 Enterprise Value to Free Cash Flow (EV/FCF)
📈 What is it?
EV/FCF shows how many years it would take for a company to "pay back" its enterprise value using its free cash flow.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It focuses on real cash generation, ignoring accounting noise — ideal for assessing profitability and value based on liquidity, not earnings.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low EV/FCF may signal undervaluation and strong cash generation.
- A high EV/FCF might reflect weak recent cash flow or aggressive growth expectations.
- Best suited for stable, mature businesses with predictable free cash flows.
📘 Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B)
📈 What is it?
The P/B ratio compares a company’s market value to its book value — showing how much investors are paying for each dollar of net assets.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
P/B is commonly used for asset-heavy industries like banks or industrials. It helps assess whether a stock is trading above or below its net asset value.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A P/B below 1 may signal undervaluation — or weak profitability.
- A P/B above 1 implies the market expects future value creation (e.g., brand, IP, growth).
- Best used for companies with tangible assets and strong balance sheets.
📘 Dividend per Share (DPS)
📈 What is it?
Dividend per Share shows how much cash a company pays out to shareholders for each share they own – usually on an annual or quarterly basis.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
DPS is the absolute value of the payout per share – crucial for income-focused investors and dividend strategies.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A stable or growing DPS often signals a strong, shareholder-friendly business.
- DPS alone doesn’t tell you how attractive the payout is – the stock price also matters (→ see Dividend Yield).
- Long-term dividend growth is often a hallmark of high-quality companies – like the dividend aristocrats.
📘 Dividend Yield
📈 What is it?
Dividend yield shows how large a company’s dividend is in relation to its current share price.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It allows investors to compare dividend payouts across stocks, regardless of price or payout size.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A stable yield can reflect reliable distributions.
- Comparing 1Y and 5Y yield shows whether dividend growth keeps pace with stock price appreciation.
- A low yield isn’t always negative – it can signal strong past performance or growth focus.
📘 Dividend Growth
📈 What is it?
Dividend growth shows how much a company has increased its dividend per share over time.
🧮 How is it calculated?
5Y: Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR)
🏛️ Why is it important?
Consistently rising dividends are often a sign of financial strength and shareholder orientation – especially relevant for long-term investors.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Stable dividend growth is a sign of sustainable earning power.
- High dividend growth can significantly boost your total return:
- If a company pays $1 in dividends and increases it by 15% annually over 5 years, you’ll receive $2 per share in year 5 – twice as much as at the start!
📘 Payout Ratio
📈 What is it?
The payout ratio shows what percentage of a company’s earnings (per share) is distributed to shareholders as dividends.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It helps assess whether the dividend is sustainable – especially in relation to the company’s profitability.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low payout ratio means the company retains more earnings for reinvestment – typical for growth companies.
- A moderate payout (e.g. 25–50%) indicates a healthy balance between returns and reinvestment.
- High payout ratios may seem attractive but can carry risk if earnings decline.
📘 Consecutive Dividend Increases
📈 What is it?
This metric shows how many consecutive years a company has raised its dividend per share – without any cuts or pauses.
🧮 How is it calculated?
(Special dividends are not considered.)
🏛️ Why is it important?
A long track record of increases reflects financial strength, consistency, and shareholder commitment.
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A long dividend increase streak builds confidence – especially in volatile markets.
- Such companies are seen as reliable and income-friendly investments.
- The longer the streak, the stronger the company’s dividend discipline.
📘 Revenue
📈 What is it?
Revenue shows how much a company earns in total from selling its products and services – the gross income before any costs are deducted.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Revenue is one of the key figures to assess a company’s size, market position, and growth potential.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Growing revenue indicates rising demand and can be an early signal of future earnings growth.
- Comparing actual and expected revenue reveals trends in the market environment and analyst sentiment.
- Note: Strong revenue alone isn’t enough – margins and profitability matter just as much.
📘 EBITDA
📈 What is it?
EBITDA stands for “Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization.” It reflects a company’s operating profit before the effects of financing, taxes, and accounting depreciation.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
EBITDA is widely used to evaluate a company’s operating performance – especially across capital-intensive sectors or international comparisons.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high or growing EBITDA indicates strong operational profitability – independent of taxes, interest, or accounting methods.
- It’s especially useful for comparing companies across sectors or geographies.
- Important: EBITDA is not a net income figure – it excludes key costs like depreciation and interest.
📘 EBIT
📈 What is it?
EBIT stands for “Earnings Before Interest and Taxes.” It reflects a company’s operating profit after depreciation, but before interest and tax expenses.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
EBIT is a core profitability metric that shows how well the company performs in its main business operations – independent of capital structure and tax environment.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high EBIT indicates strong profitability from the company’s core business – before financial and tax effects.
- It allows better comparison between companies with different debt levels or tax structures.
- Compared to EBITDA, EBIT already accounts for depreciation and reflects capital intensity more clearly.
📘 Net Income
📈 What is it?
Net income is the company’s total profit – the amount left after all expenses, taxes, interest, and depreciation have been deducted.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Net income is the most comprehensive measure of a company’s profitability – showing how much actual profit remains after all business and financing costs.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Growing net income indicates that the company is managing all of its costs efficiently.
- It directly influences valuation metrics like P/E ratio and the company’s dividend capacity.
- Over time, net income trends reveal how resilient and profitable the business model really is.
📘 Free Cash Flow (FCF)
📈 What is it?
Free Cash Flow shows how much actual cash remains after a company covers its operating expenses and capital expenditures.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
FCF reflects a company’s real financial strength – regardless of accounting profits. It shows how much flexibility a company has for dividends, share buybacks, or debt reduction.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- High free cash flow means the company generates real, usable cash – independent of reported net income.
- It’s often the most reliable base for sustainable dividends and buybacks.
- Declining FCF can be an early warning sign – even when profits appear stable.
📘 Revenue Growth
📈 What is it?
Revenue growth shows how much a company’s sales have changed compared to the previous year – both on a trailing basis (TTM) and based on forward projections.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Forward = (Expected revenue ÷ Revenue in prior year − 1) × 100
Forward growth is based on analyst estimates for the current fiscal year.
🏛️ Why is it important?
Rising revenue signals growing demand, business expansion, and market share gains – especially important for growth-oriented companies.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Growth is the engine of long-term value creation – especially in tech and growth sectors.
- What matters is not just current growth, but its sustainability.
- Forward projections reflect whether analysts expect continued momentum – or a slowdown.
📘 EBITDA Growth
📈 What is it?
EBITDA growth shows how much a company’s operating profit (before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) has increased or decreased compared to the previous year.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Forward = (Expected EBITDA ÷ EBITDA from prior year − 1) × 100
The forward estimate is based on analyst projections for the current fiscal year.
🏛️ Why is it important?
Growing EBITDA indicates improving operational profitability – regardless of financing or accounting effects.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Strong EBITDA growth signals operational efficiency and scalability – especially during growth phases.
- EBITDA growth can be an early indicator of margin and earnings expansion – but should be assessed alongside revenue and EBIT.
📘 EBIT Growth
📈 What is it?
EBIT growth shows how much a company’s operating profit (after depreciation, but before interest and taxes) has increased compared to the previous year.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Forward = (Expected EBIT ÷ EBIT from prior year − 1) × 100
The forward estimate is based on analyst projections for the current fiscal year.
🏛️ Why is it important?
EBIT growth is a direct indicator of a company’s business performance – taking into account capital intensity through depreciation.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Rising EBIT signals improving operating profitability – even after accounting for depreciation.
- It’s especially important for evaluating companies with significant capital expenditures.
- Combined with revenue and EBITDA growth, EBIT growth provides a well-rounded view of operational progress.
📘 Net Income Growth
📈 What is it?
Net income growth shows how much a company’s bottom-line profit has increased or decreased compared to the previous year – both on a trailing basis (TTM) and based on analyst projections.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Forward = (Expected net income ÷ Net income from prior year − 1) × 100
The forward estimate reflects analysts’ expectations for the current fiscal year.
🏛️ Why is it important?
Net income is the ultimate measure of profitability. Growing net income signals stronger efficiency, cost control, and sustainable earnings power.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Stronger net income boosts valuation, dividend potential, and investor confidence.
- If profits stall while revenue grows, it may signal margin pressure.
📘 Free Cash Flow Growth
📈 What is it?
Free cash flow (FCF) growth shows how a company’s available cash – after covering operating expenses and capital expenditures – has changed compared to the previous year.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Free cash flow reflects real financial strength. Growing FCF indicates more flexibility for dividends, share buybacks, and reinvestment.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Declining FCF may point to rising investments, increasing costs, or weaker operating performance.
- Especially for dividend investors, FCF growth is critical – since dividends are paid from actual available cash.
- A negative trend isn't always bad, but it deserves closer attention.
📘 Gross Margin
📈 What is it?
Gross margin shows how much of a company’s revenue remains after deducting the direct costs of goods sold (like materials and production). It represents the company’s “raw profit” before fixed costs, taxes, and interest.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Or simply: Gross Margin = Gross Profit ÷ Revenue × 100
🏛️ Why is it important?
Gross margin indicates how efficiently a company can produce or procure what it sells. It is a key measure of product-level profitability and pricing power.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high gross margin suggests strong pricing power and efficient production.
- Falling margins may signal rising input costs or competitive pressure.
- Compared to peers, gross margin offers insights into the quality of a business model.
📘 EBITDA Margin
📈 What is it?
The EBITDA margin shows how much of a company’s revenue remains as operating profit before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization.It reflects operating efficiency without being distorted by financing or accounting factors.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
The EBITDA margin reveals how much operating income a company generates per dollar of revenue – independent of capital structure and tax effects.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high EBITDA margin reflects strong core profitability – before accounting distortions.
- It allows for effective comparisons across companies and sectors.
- A stable or growing margin signals efficient cost control and business scalability.
📘 EBIT Margin
📈 What is it?
The EBIT margin shows what percentage of revenue remains as operating profit after depreciation but before interest and taxes.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
The EBIT margin reflects a company’s core profitability while accounting for capital intensity (e.g. machinery, infrastructure). It’s especially useful for comparing businesses with different levels of depreciation.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high EBIT margin shows that the company remains efficient even after factoring in depreciation.
- It’s especially relevant for capital-intensive industries.
- Stable or rising EBIT margins over time are a strong indicator of pricing power and business quality.
📘 Net margin
📈 What is it?
Net margin shows how much of a company’s revenue remains as bottom-line profit after deducting all costs, interest, taxes, and depreciation.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Net margin reflects a company’s overall efficiency – across operations, financing, and taxation. It shows how much actual profit is generated from each dollar of revenue.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high net margin means the company is not only strong operationally but also manages financing and taxes efficiently.
- Peer comparisons reveal business quality and competitiveness.
- Declining margins despite revenue growth can be a red flag for rising costs or inefficiencies.
📘 Free cash flow margin
📈 What is it?
The free cash flow (FCF) margin shows how much of a company’s revenue remains as actual free cash after covering all operating expenses and capital expenditures.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
This margin reflects the true liquidity generated by the business – independent of accounting rules or depreciation. It’s especially relevant for dividends, buybacks, and reinvestment decisions.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high FCF margin means a company consistently generates strong cash flow.
- It’s a positive signal for financial stability and shareholder returns.
- The long-term trend is key – a declining margin may indicate rising investments or weakening operating efficiency.
📘 Equity Ratio
📈 What is it?
The equity ratio indicates what portion of a company’s total assets is financed by shareholders’ equity – in other words, how much it relies on its own capital.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
A high equity ratio reflects financial strength and stability, especially during downturns. It’s a key indicator of a company’s solvency and long-term risk profile.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Companies with high equity ratios are generally more resilient and less dependent on external debt.
- Low equity ratios can signal higher risk or aggressive financial strategies.
- Important: Always assess the equity ratio in combination with the return on equity (ROE). This shows not just how stable the company is – but also how efficiently it uses shareholder capital.
📘 Return on Equity (ROE)
📈 What is it?
Return on equity (ROE) shows how efficiently a company uses its shareholders’ equity to generate profit. In other words: how much net income is earned per dollar of equity.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
ROE is a core profitability metric. It helps investors understand whether a company delivers attractive returns on the capital provided by its shareholders.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high ROE indicates that the company is using its capital efficiently and profitably.
- It’s especially meaningful for capital-intensive businesses or firms with high equity bases.
- Important: A very high ROE can also result from high debt levels – always interpret it alongside the equity ratio to assess financial health.
📘 Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
📈 What is it?
ROCE measures how efficiently a company generates profits from its total capital – including both equity and interest-bearing debt.
🧮 How is it calculated?
It evaluates the return on all capital employed, regardless of how it’s financed.
🏛️ Why is it important?
ROCE is ideal for comparing companies with different financing structures. It shows how well management uses capital to create value for both shareholders and creditors.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high ROCE means the company uses its capital efficiently – regardless of whether it's funded by debt or equity.
- The higher the ROCE compared to peers, the more value the company creates with its invested capital.
- Especially relevant for capital-intensive sectors like industrials, energy, or infrastructure.
📘 Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
📈 What is it?
ROIC measures how efficiently a company generates returns from the capital invested in its core operations – regardless of whether the capital comes from equity or debt.
🧮 How is it calculated?
- NOPAT = Net Operating Profit After Taxes
- Invested Capital = Operating assets minus non-interest-bearing liabilities
🏛️ Why is it important?
ROIC is one of the most accurate indicators of capital efficiency. Unlike return on equity, it is not distorted by leverage and shows how much value is created for all capital providers.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high ROIC shows how effectively a company uses the capital that is truly invested in its core operations.
- Unlike ROCE, ROIC focuses only on the capital that is actively used to run the business – and that requires a return (i.e. interest-bearing).
- Especially useful when comparing companies with large amounts of excess cash or non-interest-bearing liabilities – giving a more realistic picture of capital efficiency.
📘 Leverage Ratio (Debt-to-Equity)
📈 What is it?
The leverage ratio indicates how much a company relies on interest-bearing debt (such as loans and bonds) relative to its shareholders’ equity.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
This ratio helps assess a company’s financial structure and risk profile. High leverage can enhance returns – but also increases exposure to interest rate changes and financial stress.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low leverage ratio signals financial strength and independence.
- A higher ratio can improve returns in good times but increases risk during downturns or rising interest rate periods.
- 👉 Always interpret in the context of industry, capital intensity, and interest rate environment.
📘 Earnings per share (EPS)
📈 What is it?
Earnings per Share (EPS) shows how much profit is attributable to a single share – and is one of the most important metrics for evaluating a company's performance.
🧮 How is it calculated?
The diluted share count reflects potential new shares that could be issued through options, convertible bonds, or other rights.
🏛️ Why is it important?
EPS is the basis for many key valuation metrics like P/E ratio, PEG ratio, or payout ratio. It enables comparisons of profitability across companies, regardless of their size.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- EPS captures per-share profitability and is especially useful for comparisons over time or with analyst estimates.
- Rising EPS may signal consistent growth or share buybacks.
- Important: Always use diluted EPS for more realistic valuations – especially in companies with stock-based compensation.
📘 Free cash flow per share (FCF per share)
📈 What is it?
Free Cash Flow per Share shows how much free cash flow a company generates per outstanding share – after investments, but before dividends or debt repayments.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Free cash flow is calculated as operating cash flow minus capital expenditures (CapEx).
🏛️ Why is it important?
FCF per Share reveals how much real cash is available per share – useful for dividends, buybacks, or reducing debt. Unlike net income, free cash flow is harder to manipulate and often seen as a more reliable metric.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- High FCF per share signals strong financial flexibility.
- It shows how much capital the company can effectively reinvest or return to shareholders.
- Particularly relevant for dividend payers and capital-efficient businesses.
📘 Short interest
📈 What is it?
Short interest indicates how many shares of a company are currently sold short – that is, borrowed and sold by investors who expect the price to decline.
🧮 How is it calculated?
It reflects the percentage of a company’s shares that are being shorted relative to the total shares available.
🏛️ Why is it important?
Short interest serves as a sentiment indicator: A high value may signal skepticism or bearish expectations – but also increases the potential for a short squeeze if prices rise unexpectedly.
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Low short interest usually indicates market confidence in the company.
- High short interest can be a warning sign – or an opportunity if sentiment shifts.
- Especially relevant in volatile markets or ahead of key earnings releases.
📘 Employees
📈 What is it?
The employee count shows how many people a company employs worldwide – offering insights into its size, structure, and business model.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It helps assess operational scale, labor intensity, and cost structure. Combined with revenue and profit, it enables key metrics like revenue per employee or productivity.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high headcount can signal operational complexity – but also significant growth capacity.
- Revenue per employee is a key indicator of efficiency.
- Especially useful for comparing tech, industrial, or service-heavy companies.
📘 Turnover per employee
📈 What is it?
Revenue per employee indicates how much revenue a company generates on average per employee – a key measure of efficiency and productivity.
🧮 How is it calculated?
The employee count is typically taken from the most recent annual report.
🏛️ Why is it important?
This metric helps compare business models – especially between labor-intensive and technology-driven companies. A high value suggests automation, operational efficiency, or strong value creation per head.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high revenue per employee indicates a scalable and margin-strong business model.
- A low figure may reflect labor-intensive operations or lower value-add.
- Especially helpful when comparing tech companies to industrial or service sectors.
SAF Holland Stock Analysis
Analyst Opinions
11 Analysts have issued a SAF Holland forecast:
Analyst Opinions
11 Analysts have issued a SAF Holland forecast:
SAF Holland Events
Past Events
|
AUG
5
Q2 2026 Earnings Call
about 2 months ago
|
|
MAY
6
Q1 2026 Earnings Call
5 months ago
|
|
NOV
12
Q3 2025 Earnings Call
11 months ago
|
StocksGuide Free
SAF Holland — Q2 2026 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
And welcome to our conference call on our Q2 2026 results. Let me start with a brief overview of our second quarter performance on Page 3. Overall, we delivered another solid quarter, which supports the confirmation of our outlook for fiscal year 2026. Sales increased to EUR 454 million, supported by an organic growth of 3.8% and the continued recovery and stabilization across our key OE markets. This positive top line development was also reflected in our profitability.
Adjusted EBIT margin increased to 9.6% from 9.1% a year ago, while adjusted EBITDA margin improved to 13.2%. At the same time, we continue to generate a strong cash flow. Operating free cash flow increased to EUR 21 million, driven by further improvements in net working capital management. This strong cash generation also supported a solid balance sheet with an unchanged leverage at 2.3x despite the dividend payment and the ongoing execution of our share buyback program.
Altogether, our second quarter performance once again demonstrates the strength of SAF-Holland's business model, combining organic growth, improving profitability and a strong cash generation.
On Page 4, you can see the development of group sales and the adjusted EBIT development. We delivered a solid second quarter with group sales increasing by 2.6% year-over-year to now EUR 454 million. Organic growth reached 3.8%, supported by continued strength in the EMEA trailer OE business and strong momentum in APAC. At the same time, our aftermarket business remained resilient and continued to provide a robust contribution to the overall top line.
Looking at the first half of 2026, sales increased by 1.6% year-over-year to EUR 905.7 million and organic growth was even stronger at 4.7%, although a large portion of this was offset by adverse currency effects.
Turning to profitability. Adjusted EBIT increased by around 8% to EUR 43.4 million in the second quarter, resulting in a margin improvement from 9.1% to now 9.6%. The performance was driven by higher volumes and benefited from our ongoing focus on operational excellence, productivity improvements and cost discipline. Despite an unfavorable regional mix effect in the first half of the year, profitability remains resilient. Adjusted EBIT for H1 increased to EUR 85.9 million, while the adjusted EBIT margin improved to 9.5% from 9.3% a year ago. So overall, these results once again demonstrate the resilience of our business model.
Moving on to the sales split by region and customer category on Page 5, please. Starting with EMEA, we continue to benefit from a solid trailer demand and a robust aftermarket business. As a result, the region slightly increased its contribution to group sales to around 51%. In North America, market conditions remained mixed. A positive organic growth in the Truck segment, supported by initial prebuy effects ahead of the EPA 27 legislation helped balance a more moderate trailer market environment.
Moreover, APAC delivered again the strongest growth among all regions, supported by solid demand, especially in India and Australia. Despite unfavorable currency effects, the region increased its share of group sales to more than 12%.
Looking at the performance by customer segment, trailer OE sales remained the largest category, accounting for around 49% of group sales and growth was mainly driven by continued strong demand in EMEA and APAC. Truck OE sales represented approx 12% of group sales and benefited from the first recovery effects in the North American truck market. Consequently, OE sales increased by around 6% year-over-year and amounted to EUR 276 million in the second quarter. Once again, the aftermarket business demonstrated its resilience and strategic importance, contributing a solid 39% of group sales despite adverse FX effects.
Now let's turn to the development of the EMEA region on Page 6. EMEA continued to perform well in the second quarter, benefiting from solid momentum in the European trailer market and a resilient aftermarket business. As a result, sales in the region increased by 3.6% year-over-year. Looking at the first half, organic growth reached 5.8%, broadly in line with the market development and underlining our strong market position in the region.
On the profitability side, earnings benefited from the higher business volume as well as the first contributions from our efficiency initiatives in indirect area. As a result, the adjusted EBIT margin improved to 8.0% for the first 6 months of '26, adjusted EBIT increased to EUR 37.6 million with the adjusted EBIT margin also reaching 8%.
Overall, EMEA maintained its positive momentum in the second quarter, combining solid growth with a further improvement in earnings quality.
Turning to the Americas region on Page 7, please. In North America, market conditions remained challenging overall. Although we start to see more encouraging signs of improvement during the second quarter. This was visible in the truck market, where demand benefited from initial prebuy activity ahead of the upcoming EPA 27 legislation. At the same time, our aftermarket business demonstrated its resilience and continued to provide a stable contribution to the region's performance.
Against this, sales in the Americas remained only slightly below the prior year level. On an organic basis, Q2 sales were broadly stable, while currency effects reduced top line by 1.4% year-over-year. And for the first 6 months, sales were organically 1.3% below the previous year. On the profitability side, our ongoing focus on efficiency and cost discipline continue to pay off and measures implemented across the organization helped offset the impact of lower volumes. As a result, adjusted EBIT increased to EUR 18.6 million in the second quarter. The adjusted EBIT margin improved to 11.1% compared to 10.2% in the prior year quarter, which had also been impacted by temporary tariff-related costs.
Looking at the first half of the year, profitability remained resilient with the adjusted EBIT margin improving slightly to 10.9%. Overall, the Americas region once again demonstrated its resilience, maintaining a solid double-digit margin despite still challenging market environment.
Let's turn to the APAC region on Page 8. Our APAC region continued to be a strong growth driver in the second quarter. We saw solid demand across the region, especially in India and Australia, which resulted in an organic growth of more than 18%. However, unfavorable FX effects remained a headwind and negatively impacted reported sales by 5.8%. Compared to the strong first quarter, sales were slightly lower due to usual seasonality and a somewhat more cautious investment behavior among certain fleet operators.
Profitability also developed positively. Higher sales volumes, improved operating leverage and a stronger contribution from China supported earnings growth. At the same time, our continued focus on cost discipline and further improved earnings quality across the region. So overall, APAC delivered another strong performance, combining double-digit organic growth with improved profitability and continued operational momentum.
Having said this, I hand over to Frank, who will take you through the key financials for the second quarter and the first half of 2026.
Thank you, Alex, and hello to everybody on the line. Let me start with a short overview on the EBIT to adjusted EBIT reconciliation for the group on Page 10.
In the second quarter of 2026, reported EBIT increased by 12.1% year-over-year to EUR 38.7 million, driven by higher sales and improved profitability. As usual, depreciation and amortization from purchase price allocations were adjusted and declined compared to the prior year due to expiring amortization from the IMS acquisition. Our adjustments remained very limited and included a positive onetime adjustment of provisions related to the efficiency program in the indirect area.
As a result, adjusted EBIT increased to EUR 43.4 million, corresponding to an adjusted EBIT margin of 9.6%. As such, the adjusted EBITDA margin improved to 13.2% and reflects our continued cost discipline and operational efficiency. Looking at the first half of 2026, adjusted EBIT increased to EUR 85.9 million, while the adjusted EBIT margin improved to 9.5%.
Moving on to Page 11, where you see the bridge from EBIT to basic earnings per share. As mentioned earlier, EBIT increased to EUR 38.7 million in the second quarter, driven by higher sales and improved profitability. At the same time, the finance result improved significantly to minus EUR 5.7 million, mainly reflecting lower unrealized FX effects as well as reduced interest expenses. The effective tax rate came in at 34.5%. While it is still affected by non-capitalized deferred tax assets relating to interest and loss carryforwards, we continue to expect a tax rate of around 35% for the full year.
Overall, the combination of higher profitability and improved finance result led to a strong increase in earnings. Basic earnings per share doubled year-over-year to EUR 0.48, while adjusted EPS increased to EUR 0.63. For the first half as a whole, basic earnings per share amounted EUR 0.93 and adjusted earnings per share to EUR 1.24, clearly demonstrating the progress we have made in terms of profitability and earnings quality.
Moving to Page 12, where you can see the development of the equity ratio. Equity increased by 3.1% to EUR 507 million compared to year-end, mainly supported by the positive net profit in the first half year. At the same time, total assets increased by 4.8%, primarily reflecting the seasonal buildup in working capital. In addition, equity was impacted by the dividend payment completed during the second quarter as well as our ongoing share buyback program. As a result, equity ratio stood at 29.1% at the end of June 2026, only slightly below the year-end 2025 level. Overall, our balance sheet remains very solid, underlining the continued strength of our financial position.
Turning to Page 13. I would like to speak about net working capital development. Net working capital increased compared to year-end 2025, mainly reflecting the usual seasonal inventory buildup. In addition, we deliberately built inventory buffers ahead of the successful SAP S/4 HANA go-live at our Haldex facilities in the Americas in July.
Trade receivables were somewhat higher due to a change in customer mix with longer payment terms, while trade payables developed favorably and offset a large part of this effect. As a result, net working capital ratio increased to 17.6% of sales from 16.8% at year-end. At the same time, we further improved the ratio compared to June last year, reducing it from 18.2% to 17.6%, mainly thanks to more efficient inventory management and improved payment terms. Overall, net working capital remained well within our target range.
And now let me address the cash flow development on Page 14. We delivered a very strong performance in the first half of 2026 with operating cash flow increasing to EUR 86.6 million compared to EUR 30.5 million in the prior year period. The main driver was a significantly lower cash outflow from net working capital, reflecting the improvements and measures I discussed earlier. Tax payments remained broadly stable, while the other cash flow item benefited mainly from favorable valuation effects in other assets as well as from positive changes related to deferred tax assets.
Investments in property, plant and equipment as well as intangible assets amounted to EUR 20.8 million or to 2.3% of group sales and were fully in line with our full year guidance. Our investments remain focused on automation and modernization projects, the ongoing SAP S/4 HANA implementation and selective production equipment investments supporting our drive2030 strategy. These investments also included the acquisition of real estate related to our former Italian acquisitions and the construction of our new facility in Nashik, which is scheduled to become operational next year.
As a result, operating free cash flow increased significantly to EUR 65.8 million in the first half of 2026, demonstrating the group's strong cash generation capabilities.
Moving on to an overview of the leverage development on Page 15. At the end of June 2026, the net debt-to-EBITDA ratio remained stable at 2.3x compared to year-end 2025 despite cash outflows of EUR 28.8 million for the dividend payment and EUR 13.3 million for our ongoing share buyback program. Excluding IFRS 16 lease liabilities, leverage would have stood at 2x. And now I hand back to Alex.
Yes. Thank you, Frank. I'm on Page 17, showing the fiscal year 2026 forecast for the trailer and truck markets. Overall, our market assumptions remain largely unchanged and the trends we have seen in the first half continue to support our outlook for 2026. In Europe, we have slightly upgraded our expectations for the trailer market and now expect growth of between plus 5% and plus 10%, reflecting the ongoing solid demand momentum.
In North America, production levels remained relatively low during the second quarter. However, recent order activity, improving freight rates and greater regulatory clarity around EPA 27 reinforce our expectation for a stronger second half. Therefore, our outlook remains unchanged with Class 8 truck production expected to grow by 0% to 10% plus and trailer production expected to remain broadly stable.
In APAC, our overall assumptions are also largely unchanged. Following the solid start to the year, we have become slightly more optimistic on the Chinese trailer market and now expect growth in the range of plus 5% to plus 10%. Overall, the expectations provide further confidence in our outlook for 2026.
Having said that, let me briefly come to our guidance for fiscal year 2026 on Page 18. As discussed in the market outlook, we continue to expect solid demand in EMEA and APAC, while North America is expected to gain momentum as we move through the second half of the year. Building on this, profitability will continue to be influenced by the overall volume development as well as the business mix. At the same time, the resilience of our aftermarket business remains an important support for margins and earnings quality.
In addition, the overall economic environment could continue to be shaped by geopolitical uncertainties and increased volatility in the energy and commodities market. This could result in pressures on the procurement side. However, we expect to be able to largely offset the resulting pressures through pricing measures and ongoing efficiency and productivity gains as we have done in the past.
In addition, our efficiency initiatives continue to progress according to plan. The measures implemented across admin and sales functions are expected to generate increasing benefits over time and help offset general wage inflation. Overall, this gives us confidence in our current outlook for the year.
So let me briefly summarize the key takeaways on Page 19. Looking back at the first half, we have continued to execute on the priorities we set at the beginning of the year, growing the business, improving profitability and generating strong cash flow. The progress we have made across all 3 regions reflects the resilience of our business model, the strength of our aftermarket activities and the commitment of our teams around the world.
With positive momentum in our key markets and a solid financial foundation, we enter the second half of the year with confidence and remain firmly on track to deliver our objectives for 2026. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes the presentation. We can now start with your questions. So operator, the first question, please.
[Operator Instructions]
The first question comes from Holger Schmidt, DZ Bank.
2. Question Answer
My first question is on the guidance. I mean you confirm the guidance for the current year, but you raised the market outlook for trailers in EMEA, which is one of the largest end markets. Is it fair to assume that you now consider the upper end of the guidance range to be more feasible than the midpoint?
I would take that, Mr. Schmidt. This is Alex Geis. Well, absolutely, we confirmed the guidance. You know that our guidance has a spread of some millions. At this point of time, we already incorporated at the beginning of our guidance, a better second half in the Americas, specifically in the truck market, which is also a key market for us.
Now the European trailer market is getting a little bit better, not really hugely better, but a little bit better. So we continue to confirm our guidance. I would not say anything if it's the upper end of the guidance. But as you know us, we stay conservative. And at this point of time, we will not touch our guidance. So we confirm our guidance as you just have read it. And also, we have a little bit less working days in the second half of the year. Please don't forget that also.
Yes. Well, understood. My second question is with regard to the Americas region. You reported a 7% increase in the adjusted EBIT on more or less robust sales. Was it solely based on improved efficiency? Or was it also supported by any effects related to the U.S. tariff refunds?
But it was not only the increased productivity that was also a cornerstone of our increased profitability. We also have a very strong aftermarket business in the Americas, which with a higher share than we have an aftermarket in Europe. That was also strong. Our reman business also kicked in with a good profitability for us. It was a mix of everything. So basically, it's the volume mix, it's the productivity. It's also getting more volume in our newly opened facilities, for instance, for the truck fifth wheels in Piedras, which we opened 2 years ago or 1.5 years ago. So it's a mix of everything, I would say.
Okay. And then my last question is with regard to the U.S. trailer market. I mean we have seen substantial improvements in monthly order data recently. And the CEO of Wabash, one of the big trailer manufacturers noted that the current freight market recovery trends are driving trailer demand in a way that the company has not seen for 40 years. How do you think demand will develop in the future, not only in '26, but going forward? Is this the start of a new cycle in the U.S. trailer market?
Let's hope it will be. For 2026, I have to say again, it will be subdued. It's not increasing heavily. Of course, we also talk with the big trailer manufacturers, also Mr. Yeagy, the CEO of Wabash, of course. We hope that it will be increasing by the end of the year. And I'm pretty sure that it will be substantially be increasing in 2027. So the trailer market was really bad in the last 2 years already, so '25, '26 also look really good. So we see a, let's say, an increasing financial interest of the fleets to also now invest in trailer equipment again. And I really hope that it will be increasing substantially in 2027.
The next question comes from Yasmin Steilen, Berenberg.
I have 2, if I may. So the first one, I guess, more for you, Alexander, on the strategy. So we have heard other truck suppliers becoming more vocal about the structural change among the truck OEMs and the shift towards EV. So what's your assumption on the speed of the electrification and the increasing importance of the Asian truck OEMs? And how is SAF positioned in terms of customer inroads to the kind of new truck OEMs and in terms of the product portfolio, do you see any chances to increase your content per vehicle in the electrified world? That's my first question.
Yes. Let me start answering the first part of your question, how I see the speed of the electrification in the truck market. It's still very low. We have seen a big momentum like 4, 5 years ago. It went down a little bit, and we also have seen that with a lot of depreciations with the big truck manufacturers. It will come for sure. We have more trucks on the road, which are EV vehicles, specifically also now more in the Asian world. We not only supply to all the truck manufacturers globally, our fifth wheels, but also truck suspensions and also a big basket of our products from the Haldex world.
So a lot of valves -- we are supplying slack adjusters we are supplying. So we have a huge basket and also in the future, we would like to increase supplying more and more products to get more content throughout the whole vehicle. So we're working towards that. And also one of the major cornerstones will be the air disc brake. We started now manufacturing truck brakes also in China and we are succeeding now with the first orders coming from truck manufacturers from Chinese trucks. And this is the start. We gained some momentum in North America with our air disc brakes being manufactured in Monterrey in Mexico and also started supplying in Europe coming from our Swedish facilities and now also starting to supply to Turkey. So this is then a bigger, let's say, basket and a bigger content overall in the future.
That's very helpful. And then my second question on your working capital development. You stated that Q2 development was mainly affected by the usual seasonal buildup. Have you experienced any stress to the supply chain already? Or should we expect in terms of working capital some effect in the second half?
Yes, I can take this. So we have a really solid supply strategy, always dual or even triple source plan, and we don't see really stress on the supply chain. There are some discussions in the market. But from our own organization, we don't see.
[Operator Instructions]
The next question comes from Nicolai Kempf, Deutsche Bank.
It's Nicolai from Deutsche Bank and well done for a good quarter. A couple of questions also from my side, and I will take them one by one. First, on the U.S. market. And you have mentioned both, right, that is supporting the outlook for H2 is higher freight rates and also with the EPA changes and potential prebuy effect. Do you see rather freight rates or rather the EPA emission change as an underlying driver because the reason could be then if you look at '27, where there will be like, yes, a lower start to the year in H1 and some OEMs are also talking about a phase-in and because I think there's a bit of unclarity how the final details will work out. That's my first question.
I will take that, Nicolai. This is Alex Geis. I would say it's a mix of both. It's the increased freight rates and also the EPA. Normally, if you come with a new EPA regulation, there is a massive prebuy effect. This slowed down. So it will not look like a hockey stick. And then by January 2027, when the truck owners didn't do the registration will fall down like 30%. We don't see that. But we see a continuously increasing order intake with the truck manufacturers now taking orders for the fourth quarter already.
And we also see that in our orders, they are picking up for slack adjusters for fifth wheels, for truck suspensions. So for everything basically. But it will not be dropping by 30% by 2027. We see more a constant increase now for the second half of 2026 and then a continuation in 2027. As I mentioned before, we'd rather see then an increase -- a massive increase in trailer orders by beginning of 2027. But I would say it's a mix of everything.
Okay. Sounds good. And then on EMEA, I mean, you, I think, partly answered that. There's truck OEMs flagging high input costs and also higher freight costs. You said you're going to raise prices. Have you raised prices so far? Is that something that's going to happen in H2?
Well, I didn't speak about the truck manufacturers in detail. Well, the thing is we still have the Middle East conflict going on. Unfortunately, this is not being solved. We all know when we fill our passenger cars up with gasoline, and we can see the record prices at the gas station. This really is a drawback for the whole industry, I have to say. You have to get more and higher diesel surcharges in Europe. We have to pay the fleets also for our output goods and our suppliers for incoming goods to us. What is a little bit of a big question mark is actually all the goods being exported from India because at the moment, it's really hard to get sea freight containers. There is a little bit of a shortage. It's not massive, but there is a little bit of a shortage and the sea freight rates increased at the moment.
So we are watching that. Of course, our suppliers too at the moment, everything is still okay, but there might be, yes, let's say, a moment coming that if we see increasing prices from logistics, then we, of course, have to also ask our customers to do that. For the time being, we didn't do that, but we are ready to do that if we have to do it. But at the moment, there is no big demand of doing that. But we are watching it very closely with our sourcing teams around the globe.
Okay. Understood. Sounds good. And just my last question, with leverage coming down in H2, anything we should keep in mind for potential M&A? Or do you think this year is rather focusing on lifting synergies, bit of delevering, executing share buyback and then maybe next year, take another look at potential M&A targets.
I can take this, Nicolai. First of all, based on our solid operational performance, leverage should be expected to come down step by step. That's the usual. You see our strong performance in terms of cash flow, and this is how we expect it usually also really stable and solid EBITDA generation.
So without considering any M&A, it's a clear tendency to be expected. Talking about M&A, as we are explaining this in every call, we really do a strong market review and monitoring. We are discussing with a lot of companies about potential ideas. But on the other hand, to be honest, as we are now in August, there is not so much time left to do -- to publish a big thing in the next month. In our capital allocation, we continue our share buyback program to keep the money in the company. And we will let you all know if we have something to announce as soon as it's precise and clear.
[Operator Instructions]
Ladies and gentlemen, there are no further questions. I would now like to turn the conference back over to CFO, Frank Lorenz-Dietz, for closing remarks.
Yes. Thank you. So thank you for your questions and for joining today's call. As always, our Investor Relations team remains available should you have any follow-up questions. Over the coming months, we will be attending various roadshows and conferences, and we look forward to meeting many of you in person. We would also be delighted to welcome you at our IAA event on September 15 in Hanover and look forward to the opportunity for further discussions. Have a great day, and goodbye.
SAF Holland — Q2 2026 Earnings Call
SAF Holland — Q1 2026 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Good morning, everyone, and welcome to our conference call on our Q1 2026 results. Turning to the financial highlights for the first quarter in this year on Page 3, please. Here, you can see that group sales reached around EUR 452 million, representing an organic growth of 5.6% year-over-year and benefited from the recovery trend in EMEA as well as in APAC. However, the Americas region continued its weak momentum in both truck and trailer segments. As a result, this caused a negative regional mix effect in the first quarter. And overall, profitability was nearly on par with the previous year, and the quarter closed with a solid adjusted EBIT margin of 9.4% and the adjusted EBITDA margin was 13%. The operating free cash flow came in strongly with around EUR 45 million, reflecting strict working capital management and, as said before, a solid organic growth. Leverage further improved to 2.2x, mainly due to the strong cash performance. And in a nutshell, Q1 '26 represents a solid start to the year and gives us confidence for the months ahead.
On Page 4, you can see the development of group sales and adjusted EBIT development. During the first quarter, SAF-Holland benefited from the ongoing recovery in the European OE market, while APAC markets also recorded a clear sequential improvement. Against this backdrop, the group delivered solid organic revenue growth of 5.6%, demonstrating the strength of its regional and business mix. The aftermarket business was -- continued to perform at a high and resilient level, providing stable support to overall revenues. While the foreign exchange effects created a headwind of around 5%, group sales reached EUR 451.7 million in the first 3 months of the year, slightly exceeding the prior year level. And now turning to profitability. SAF-Holland achieved a solid adjusted EBIT margin of 9.4%, and this performance reflects continued strict cost discipline, mainly within SG&A as a result of the first positive contributions from the efficiency program in indirect functions.
So overall, the group's resilient margin development once again highlights the robustness and scalability of SAF-Holland's operating model even in a mixed market environment. Moving on to the sales split by region and customer category on the next page, please. Here, you can see that in the first quarter of '26, EMEA further strengthened its position with the region increasing to around 52% of group sales now. This development was driven by the ongoing recovery in European trailer and truck OE demand. In North America, commercial vehicle production levels remain subdued. However, the market is providing early signs of stabilization. By contrast, APAC delivered a strong performance, supported by solid demand growth in India and Australia. And as a result, revenues in the region grew almost -- by almost 9% with APAC contributing 13% to group sales now. Looking at the performance by customer segment, the recovery momentum in Europe and APAC translated into a meaningful increase in trailer OE sales, which grew by around 6% and accounted for now 52% of group sales.
Truck OE sales now representing 11% of the group's top line, reflecting the still cautious market environment in North America and mainly in the U.S. And once again, the aftermarket business demonstrated its resilience and strategic importance, contributing a solid 30% -- 37% of total group sales. Let's speak about EMEA on the next page, please. With OE demand improving across the trailer and truck segments, EMEA delivered strong organic sales growth of 8% in the first quarter of '26. And this performance was further supported by a stable and resilient aftermarket business, providing an additional pillar of strength. Geopolitical developments, including the conflict in the Middle East, have so far not had any material impact on the group's order book, which gives us confidence for the upcoming months. And despite a slightly adverse mix effect resulting from the higher share of the growing OE business, adjusted EBIT increased by around 16% compared to the prior year.
This improvement was primarily driven by the positive scale effects and continued strict cost management, reflecting the benefits of the efficiency program implemented in the indirect area, which we started already last year. So overall, EMEA delivered a solid performance in the first quarter of this year. Speaking of Americas on the next slide, please. Here, you can see that in the first quarter of '26, demand in the OE business remains subdued across our truck and trailer segments, reflecting an ongoing uncertainty around the U.S. tariff policy as well as the potential industry discussions related to EPA27. At the same time, our aftermarket business once again demonstrated also its resilience and was able to partially offset the softer OE environment, supporting the overall sales development. Against a still comparatively strong prior year with solid -- with still solid truck demand, organic sales were moderately lower by 2.5%. FX developments remained a headwind with a negative impact of 8.5% on reported sales.
And following the successful implementation of retroactive price adjustments in the fourth quarter of '25 to fully offset additional tariff-related costs, the first quarter of '26 showed a stable overall pricing and cost position. The year-over-year development in adjusted EBIT mainly reflects lower fixed cost absorption in a softer volume environment. This effect was substantially mitigated by continued strict cost discipline, mainly also here within SG&A. Overall, the Americas segment demonstrated its resilience, delivering a solid double-digit margin despite ongoing market weaknesses mainly in the U.S. Last but not least, on the next slide, we speak about our APAC region. And here in APAC, the overall demand continued to improve during the first quarter, and the region benefited from the ongoing recovery in the Indian trailer market as well as a solid demand in Australia and New Zealand.
While exports from India to Asian markets remained subdued due to tariff frameworks, this had only a limited impact on the overall regional development. FX effects continued to represent a heavy headwind with a negative impact of 13.4% on reported sales. The adjusted EBIT increased by around 8%, in line with sales growth, resulting in a stable profitability level year-over-year. And at the same time, the SAF-Holland operation in China showed a strong operational recovery driven by improved capacity utilization as well as a targeted efficiency program. Overall, APAC delivered a solid and increasingly balanced performance with improving end markets and continued progress on the operational side. And having said this, I hand over to Frank for the key financials for the first quarter.
Thank you, Alex, and hello to everybody on the line. Let me start with a short overview on the EBIT to adjusted EBIT reconciliation for the group on Page 10. During the first 3 months of 2026, reported EBIT increased slightly by 2.8% year-over-year to EUR 36.9 million supported by our overall strict cost management. Moreover, depreciation and amortization from purchase price allocations were adjusted as usual and declined by EUR 1.2 million compared to the prior year, mainly due to expiring amortization related to the IMS acquisition. Our adjustments remained at low level of only EUR 0.9 million and were largely coming from legal and transaction-related expenses. As a result, SAF-Holland achieved an almost stable adjusted EBIT and a solid adjusted EBIT margin of 9.4% in the first quarter 2026. The adjusted EBITDA margin remained broadly stable at robust 13%, underlining the continued resilience of the group's earnings profile.
Moving on to Page 11, where you see the bridge from EBIT to basic earnings per share. As mentioned earlier, reported EBIT for the first quarter amounted to EUR 36.9 million. At the same time, we made further progress in actively managing below-the-line items. The financial result improved by EUR 10.1 million to a level of minus EUR 5.2 million. This improvement was mainly driven by lower unrealized FX effects. Following the adjustments to our intercompany financing structure, we were able to further reduce our overall FX exposure. The remaining exposure was positively influenced by favorable currency movements, particularly to the U.S. dollar. As a result, while the prior year period was still burdened by negative FX effect of EUR 5.8 million, the first quarter of this year benefited from a positive FX contribution. In addition and even more important, we further optimized our external financing structure and interest expenses declined by EUR 1.1 million or almost 9% year-over-year.
Income taxes remained broadly stable compared to the previous year with an effective tax rate of 35.3%. Tax rate continues to be mainly influenced by noncapitalized deferred assets related to interest and loss carryforwards. For the full year '26, we continue to expect a tax rate of around 35%. Overall, the improved finance results, together with an improved EBIT translated into a strong earnings performance. Reported EPS increased by 57% year-over-year to EUR 0.45. Hence, also the adjusted EPS increased by almost 38% to EUR 0.61. Adjusting all the unrealized FX effects according to our dividend definition, the EPS improved by 4.2% versus previous year, which is highlighting the resilience and profitability of the group despite a still challenging market environment.
Moving to Page 12, where you see the development of the equity ratio. Compared with the year-end 2025, equity rose by 4.9% or EUR 24.2 million to EUR 516.2 million, mainly driven by the positive result for the period. At the same time, the balance sheet total grew by 5.8% compared to year-end 2025 primarily reflecting the seasonal buildup of working capital in the first quarter. As a result, the equity ratio stood at a solid 29.3% at the end of March '26 and therefore, almost reached the year-end 2025 level. Turning to Page 13. I would like to speak about net working capital development. Net working capital at March 2026 was influenced by several factors. First, it reflects the usual seasonal buildup at the beginning of the year, which was further supported by continued top line growth. At the same time, trade payables developed very favorably, benefiting from extended payment terms versus our suppliers and providing significant positive contribution to working capital.
In addition, development was further supported by strict inventory management, which remains a key focus area for the remainder of the year. In contrast, trade receivables increased mainly due to a structurally different customer mix that was partly compensated by higher factoring volumes of plus EUR 8 million. Overall, these developments resulted in an improvement in net working capital of 4.2% to 17.1% of sales and therefore, comfortably in our target corridor of 16% to 18%. And now let me address the cash flow development on Page 14. Net cash flow from operating activities developed very strongly in the first quarter, reaching EUR 44.8 million. This performance reflects not only the solid operating result, but also a favorable development in working capital. As mentioned earlier, net working capital benefited from targeted measures, including improvement -- improved payment terms and a general strict inventory management.
In addition, tax payments decreased slightly in line with the underlying business development of previous years. The other line amounting to EUR 5 million primarily relates to changes in deferred tax assets. Investments in property, plant and equipment and intangible assets totaled EUR 5.1 million, corresponding to 1.1% of group sales. As typical for the first quarter, investment activity remained at a comparatively moderate level, fully in line with our full year guidance of up to 3% of sales. Overall, investments were focused on further automation and modernization of production processes alongside targeted equipment additions in line with our drive2030 ambition to grow our business to more than EUR 3 billion until 2030. Moving on to an overview of the leverage development on Page 15. Net debt-to-EBITDA ratio stood at 2.2x at the end of March '26, slightly below the level at year-end 2025 and benefited in particular from an improved net debt.
Gross debt increased moderately and was influenced by the issuance of a EUR 100 million promissory note loan. This transaction further strengthened the maturity profile and was mainly used to refinance around EUR 93 million of outstanding maturities mainly due in March 2027. At the same time, our cash and cash equivalents increased by approximately EUR 34 million. This improvement was achieved despite the ongoing share buyback program, under which EUR 6.2 million were deployed during the quarter. In addition, we further strengthened our financing profile by extending our revolving credit facility by EUR 75 million to EUR 325 million, which was undrawn by the end of March '26. Altogether, we see solid headroom to target on midsized M&A projects without additional financing. Excluding the IFRS 16 effect, our leverage would have amounted to a significantly lower level of 1.9x at the end of March '26. And now I hand back to Alex.
Yes. Thank you, Frank. I'm on Page 17, showing the 2026 forecast for the trailer and truck markets. And as mentioned earlier, European and Asia Pacific markets showed encouraging signs of recovery at the start of the year. And in contrast, North America continues to be shaped by a more cautious demand environment primarily driven by ongoing uncertainties surrounding the upcoming EPA27 regulations, but also due to the USMCA discussions going on. Looking ahead, we expect the trailer and truck markets in North America in '26 to benefit from improving freight rates and increasing regulatory clarity over the course of the year, supporting a gradual normalization of demand. Therefore, we continue to expect a largely stable development in North American trailer market. And at the same time, we have upgraded our outlook for the Class 8 truck market and now expect growth in the range of 0% to 10% plus.
In the Brazilian CV market, which remained below expectations and against the backdrop of a persistently high interest rate environment, we currently see a market decline in the range of 5% to 10% for '26. For EMEA, we continue to see a steady to moderately positive development in trailer markets, while the heavy truck market is expected to show a somewhat stronger growth profile with increases of up to 10%. Also, our market expectations for the APAC region were moderately updated post the strong development in Q1. Having said that, let me briefly come to our guidance for '26 on Page 18. And here, we confirm our guidance unchanged across all key performance indicators.
At the same time, the current geopolitical environment, particularly developments related to the conflict in the Middle East and the potential implications for the broader economic situation of our end markets remain difficult to assess with a high degree of uncertainty. That said, based on what we see today, we feel confident in the resilience of our business model, which positions us well to respond flexibly to potential demand and cost dynamics. So from today's perspective, we do not see any material impact on SAF-Holland and therefore, remain comfortably with our current outlook. And last but not least, let me briefly summarize the key takeaways for the first quarter on the next slide. First of all, we have seen a solid start into the year with demand normalization in Europe and Asia Pacific, clearly gaining traction and translating into an improved top line performance.
This underlines that our regional diversification is paying off. At the same time, we continue to demonstrate the resilience of our earnings profile with an adjusted EBIT margin of 9.4%, we are essentially on par with last year's level, supported by disciplined cost management and a solid contribution across our 3 regions. Cash generation was very strong in the first quarter with an operating free cash flow of nearly EUR 45 million, reflecting our continued focus on efficient working capital management across the organization. So overall, Q1 was an encouraging start into '26 and gives us confidence that we are well positioned to navigate a volatile macro and geopolitical environment. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes the presentation. Thank you for listening, and we now can start with our questions. Operator, the first question, please.
[Operator Instructions] The first question comes from the line of Holger Schmidt from DZ Bank AG.
2. Question Answer
I have a question on the aftermarket business. We have seen growth for a longer period. The revenues are down by about 14% as compared to the second quarter in '24. What is driving that? Is it purely the volume? Have you not been able to push price increases? And when do you expect the business to come back to positive growth again?
Well, if I understand your question correctly, Mr. Schmidt, you were asking about a decline of aftermarket sales.
That's right.
I -- which I cannot confirm. First of all, we are not displaying our aftermarket sales. And I can report that the aftermarket is very stable in both major regions, which is Europe or EMEA and also North America. Specifically in North America, that was the driver that we could keep our profitability. So there is no decline of aftermarket business.
I mean looking at the figures, I mean, if I'm right, you published EUR 167 million in aftermarket revenues in the first quarter.
You are referring to the 37% share of our aftermarket business in total group sales.
That's right.
It's what you're referring?
Yes.
Yes.
And this is down as compared to the second quarter in 2024, so about 2 years ago by around 14%, which means we haven't seen growth in the aftermarket business, effectively a decline in the aftermarket business over a longer period of time. And I'm asking what is it -- what are the drivers behind it? Is it purely the volume? Have you not been able to push price increases? What drives the decline in the aftermarket business since the second quarter of 2024?
So maybe I take this to ask again, you are jumping back 2 years going to 2024.
That's right, yes.
Yes, it's a good question. There might be a slight reduction, but aftermarket business, as you know, is really depending on driven miles. And we have seen, especially in the big market in Europe, a reduction in industry transportation due to the decline in the automotive industry. So reduced driven miles are a little bit impacting our volumes in aftermarket, what will recover as soon as we come back to normal industry levels in these regions. But it's not a big topic. If you add then the big portion of the U.S. of our Americas business that we are strong in aftermarket, you have to add again another 10% to 15% reduction from FX because we are reporting in euro and the sales is coming in, in U.S. dollars.
So overall, if we take the volume in aftermarket, we do have a little bit reduction in EMEA, but it's partially even offset by our higher population we have generated the last 5 years, but we also have a huge FX impact from the depreciation of the U.S. dollar in the top line. There is no issue in margin. And even on the price side, as we mentioned already in last year's calls, even the tariff topics we could offset in the U.S. in aftermarket as we do usually in our market. So from the business performance, we don't see any impact -- any negative impact in the aftermarket. It's key topic is FX, taking 2024 U.S. dollar rate to burn rate. And the second is a little bit in Europe, the lower driven miles from reduced industry transportation that we even partially offset with higher population. So performance-wise, no doubt in our aftermarket.
Okay. That's very helpful. So my second question is on your M&A ambitions. I mean, back at your Capital Markets Day last year, you highlighted the M&A ambitions. I think you mentioned an M&A capacity of up to EUR 1.5 billion with a focus on entering into adjacent markets. We haven't seen any major activity so far. Can you give us an update where you stand here?
I'll take this question again. First of all, the EUR 1.5 billion, I can confirm we do see firepower to do really reasonable M&As. Second is topic, the strategy is drive2030. So this does not mean that only 6 or 12 months after publishing it, we go and buy something. We are really, really selective. We are investigating a lot of companies, visiting companies. But our target is to create value for the company. And this is leading us into the topic that we have to really do a good analysis and look for a really perfect fit target. And I have to admit this takes some time. We have a good short list where we are discussing. And as well in our communication on the share buyback program, as we see that the activity will take us the time to really find a good target. We put some money on the share buyback program to invest it in parallel for the time being until we find the right target. As soon as we have it, you will get to know.
And we don't want to over -- let's say, overpay, of course, for targets. This is why we are really selective. And we take our time to get good targets. And as Frank said, once we are ready, we will get it.
Yes, that's helpful as well. Take your time. Makes sense. The third question is on the APAC business. I was a bit surprised about the 9% top line growth. It was quite remarkable after an extended period of declining revenues. I mean, it was driven by India and Australia. Do you think this is the start of a new cycle? And what is the potential for APAC in '26 as a whole and for the next 3 years?
Well, our biggest portion of the whole, let's say, Asia business for us is our Indian market, having more than 50% market share in trailer axles and trailer suspensions. We would like to grow that. We also have the capacity to further increase our output. That's a good sign. As a reminder, we just moved like 2, 3 years ago into a totally new facility with upgraded robots and organization. That's a good thing. India had a decline of markets the last 2 years. I can confirm that. This year, we had really a good start. We don't see huge impacts with the shortage of gas and electricity in India at the moment due to the Middle East conflict. The export specifically to the U.S. is still subdued due to the tariff situation. So we have to see how that develops. But clearly, I have to say with a share of 12%, 13% of the overall group sales, this is not sufficient. We reported that we at least would like to have 20%, 25% share in Asia until 2030 to more balance the different regions.
So if we had a 40% for Americas, 40% for EMEA and 20% at least for the APAC region, that would be a target for the years to come. We are driving that. We also put together the management teams in China. We had 2 teams, one for Haldex, one for SAF. We put that together under one roof now, this is gaining traction. We are increasing our sales, but also profitability is going up in China as one of the big markets or the biggest market in Asia. And as you said rightfully, also in the -- in Oceania, speaking of Australia, but also in New Zealand, we have high market shares with growth rates which are sufficient and good. So overall, to summarize what I just said, we would like to increase the overall portion of the business in Asia, not only in India, but also in China and the other regions like in Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, Southeast Asia in total, Japan to be more in the ballpark of 20% to 25% of group sales in the years to come.
[Operator Instructions] The next question comes from the line of Yasmin Steilen from Berenberg.
I have 3, if I may, and I will also take them one by one. So the first one on the U.S. truck and trailer market, you became more optimistic on the U.S. truck market. Is it already visible in your current business? So i.e., is it fair to assume or to expect a flattish development in Americas in Q2 and then the recovery in the second half? That's my first question.
Yes, I can confirm that the order intake and also what we invoiced in the first quarter was some kind of, let's say, slightly promising, okay? It's not overall a super wow, I have to say, it's slightly improving. Order intake is also coming specifically for the truck OE, which is one of the biggest portions of our overall U.S. business or North American business. The order intake for the second quarter is also okay, I have to say, it's increasing. We think that after we have more clarity on the EPA27 USMCA, it's still some more discussions going on.
Now new tariff regulations are coming in or talks are going -- and we still have the Middle East conflict, which drives massively the gasoline prices again now in Michigan is like $5.25, in California, $6 to $7. This really hurts our industry, I have to say, because all the diesel prices jumped and that drives the inflation in our transportation. But everybody in the market expect that the second half of this year, it's going to be better than -- much better than last year, but also better than the first quarter and the second quarter to be. So it's -- we are positively optimistic here that the second half would be better.
Okay. Perfect. Following up on this. So with regards to EBIT margin seasonality, do you expect the usual quarterly EBIT margin development? Or should we see a different pattern from the recovery of the U.S. truck and trailer market in the second half?
Basically, we do not guide EBIT by quarter to refer to our guidance, 9% to 10%. We had a good start in the year with 9.4%, almost in the middle of the guidance. And there will be usual seasonality, but nothing special.
Okay. And then the last one on working capital and the supply chain. So with the Middle East conflict, do you experience any tightness in your supply chain? And how should we think about the net working capital ratio in this context for the remainder year and also assuming the recovery of the U.S. market in the second half? That's my last question.
Overall, we have a quite solid local-for-local supply chain and also dual sourcing or free sources as well. So we don't see big impacts in terms of shortages on the supply chain. Energy cost is also not a big issue for us. We have less than 1% energy cost in our P&L. So we don't see a shortage in delivery and interruptions. Everybody has to monitor the energy supply in India. But as Alex mentioned, also, this is still working good. And hopefully, this conflict will be solved in the next weeks easily. So we don't see a big issue in that. On the net working capital also, as I have mentioned, we could manage, especially in inventory, not a big jump in the first quarter as we have normally in the season.
What is good and is also one of the reasons for our good net working capital and cash performance in the first quarter, also the improvement of accounts payable, improvement of payment terms where we placed a really solid program last year for sustainable improvement. This will remain -- and the remainder is the accounts receivable customer mix, but I don't see any big impact on the net working capital ratio as well. The corridor, 16% to 18% is a solid corridor and this structure of business with 35% to 38% aftermarket ratio. So also Q1 is a good implication for the remainder.
And mainly also add on from my side, we just had a leadership update 1 hour ago with our EMEA team and APAC team. We had the same question coming here and what I replied is well done for the first quarter, but there is still room for improvement when you see the last couple of years. So we are working very hard mainly on inventory management, but also on getting our money from our customers in.
We now have a question from the line of Nicolai Kempf from Deutsche Bank.
Yes. It's Nicolai from Deutsche Bank. Good start to Q1, so well done. I'm a bit surprised about your comments on the U.S. market just because -- and I'm just referring to trucks here, I know trailers may be a bit different. But I mean, the orders you've seen in Q1 are very strong. And I mean, yesterday, the U.S. Class 8 market leader reported Q1 numbers as well, and they pointed to a 50% unit sales increase from Q2 versus Q1. So my question is a bit if we also like assume that Q2 and so on will be stronger, I think, first of all, this could maybe make your topline guidance appear rather cautious. And my second question is, would you expect any mix shift? And how would this impact profitability so having more OE business and less aftermarket business?
Well, starting first with your last comment about the mix shift. I don't see that because typically, this is not linked to each other. You have a running population in North America, mainly in the U.S. of trucks and they need repair. I don't see a big drop of aftermarket or a shift from the aftermarket to OE. I can also confirm what you said that the order intake specifically for the month of February and March was very good and very promising. There is one thing. We have to stay cautious here because with the Middle East war going on, with the petrol, the gallon prices jumping to $6, $7 per liter, the fleets are very cautious.
And then we have the -- another discussion, new tariffs coming in. So the government, in my point of view, does everything to put uncertainty in the whole environment and the market. So our fleets are very cautious to really further invest. So let's hope that the order placed being placed in February and March also will be delivered in the second quarter and the third quarter. We stay a little bit more cautious. Let's hope for the best, but we do our planning and the planning is not overoptimistic in that regard.
Okay. Yes, clarify.
I wanted to add regarding to your mix effect, higher OE is also coming in with higher economy of scale. So this natural product mix effect, again confirm what Alex said is not coming, but we have better utilization of our equipment. And on the order book, we also need to admit that Q2 last year was a quarter with still high sales looking into a declining market where you have usually low order book. Now we look into lower delivered sales compared to last year, but looking into an improving margin. So it's -- for me, from the comparison, it's fully clear that we have this difference in order intake compared to previous quarter, we see at Daimler Truck when they published. But as Alex mentioned, it delivered finally.
Yes. Maybe just, I think you answered the question. My question was about the mix shift in profitability because the aftermarket is much more profitable than the OE business. And so then if you have a higher share of OE versus aftermarket, could this impact your margins, but you've answered that. Maybe just one quick one on Europe. Also here, rather positive signals from the truck manufacturers. I know Germany is slowly coming back, not as strong as hoped for. What do you see here in the market?
Well, we see the positive development. We were quite happy with the first quarter, not super happy like in '22 or '23 I have to admit. We are running 2 shifts in all the plants. So this is a good output, which then also creates more population for the aftermarket for the years to come. Order intake is okay also for the second quarter. So also here, we are positive looking into the future. As I said, it's not like it was in 2023 when the markets were booming and Germany is still, let's say, a question mark, I have to say. People are hesitant still. And sitting on the money, there is money available. Interest is not too high in Germany or in Western Europe. They are willing to invest. But now what happened just 6 weeks ago with the new, let's say, Middle East crisis damped a little bit the overall positive signs in the first quarter we have seen. But the second quarter is also the order intake is quite promising, I have to say.
[Operator Instructions] The next question comes from the line of Werner Friedmann from A's & I's.
It's only one question from my side. It's on the APAC region where you had shown a very, very strong organic growth of 22%. And usually, with such kind of growth, the EBIT margin would react positively too. This has not happened in that case. And I've also seen that the number of employees in the APAC region was up very strongly. Maybe if you could elaborate on what is happening there?
Yes, that's an easy one. That's mainly coming from India and India. Unfortunately, the share of aftermarket and OE, it's not like 70% to 30%, 70% OE and 30% aftermarket. It's mainly driven by OE business, so 90% plus and the increase in sales was coming from the OE business and the OE business, the margins are stable. This is why the margins did not jump heavily, I have to say.
We have really good cost flexibility. You even could not see last year when sales declined an impact on margin. So we have really a flexible cost structure, and that's why margin goes basically stable along with sales up and down.
Ladies and gentlemen, there are no more questions at this time. I would now like to turn the conference back over to Mr. Lorenz-Dietz for any closing remarks.
Yes. So thank you, everyone, for your questions. Our Investor Relations team is available in case you have any follow-up questions. We will be, as usual, on the road attending conferences in the coming weeks and months and look forward to seeing you there. Have a good day, and goodbye.
Thank you.
SAF Holland — Q3 2025 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Dear ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the SAF-Holland SE Q3 2025 Results. Today's presenters are CEO, Alexander Geis; and CFO, Frank Lorenz-Dietz.
The presentation slides are available on the SAF-Holland Corporate website. [Operator Instructions] Please note this conference call will be recorded and published on the corporate website of SAF-Holland SE. Everything spoken through un-muted microphone will be processed during the online meeting and published on the website of SAF-Holland SE. [Operator Instructions] The Q&A session is exclusively for institutional investors and analysts. All other participants of the conference call are kindly asked to contact the Investor Relations team directly if they have any questions. Mr. Geis, the floor is yours.
Thank you. Good morning, everyone, and welcome to our conference call on our Q3 '25 results. Let me begin with the Q3 '25 financial highlights on Page 3, please. The past quarter was again characterized by a challenging market environment, which SAF-Holland mastered well, thanks to its resilient business model and operational discipline. In numbers, group sales declined organically by 2.5% and ultimately reached EUR 417.2 million, which is around 5% below the prior year. Despite softer demand from OE customers and additional tariff-related expenses, we were able to maintain a solid profitability of 9.1% and an adjusted EBITDA margin of 13.2%. And in addition, the company generated a solid operating free cash flow of plus EUR 38.5 million. That's a clear improvement compared to the second quarter.
Leverage remained stable at 2.4x due to the cash outflow for the dividend payment, M&A activities and additional lease liabilities for our new Texas plant in Rowlett. Given the continued softness of the North American truck market and muted demand from Southeast Asian customers with U.S.-based end clients, we have adjusted our full year '25 sales outlook accordingly.
Now let me continue with the group sales and adjusted EBIT development on Page 4, please. You can see that group sales in the third quarter of '25 continued to reflect the lower demand in the global CV markets. In particular, the North American OE markets as well as demand from the Southeast Asian customers, for instance, in Thailand and Vietnam were affected by the U.S. tariff policy. As a result, OE sales declined by 6.9% year-over-year, leading to an organic sales decline of 2.5% in Q3. And in addition, FX effects weighed on top line performance by 3.3 percentage points, while Assali Stefen provided a low single-digit euro million contribution to group sales. Overall, group sales declined by 5.2% compared to the prior year. And in the first 9 months of ' 25, group sales were 9.9% below the previous year's level with organic sales down 9.7% year-over-year.
Between July and September, adjusted EBIT was again affected by a net effect of tariff-related costs in the low single-digit million euro range, which we expect to largely offset through further price measures over the next months. In addition, profitability was impacted by a moderately higher depreciation ratio. Consequently, adjusted EBIT declined by 12% year-over-year, resulting in a 9.1% adjusted EBIT margin. For the first 9 months of this year, adjusted EBIT totaled EUR 121.1 million, corresponding to a solid margin of 9.3%, while the adjusted EBITDA margin remained nearly on the prior year level of 13.1%.
So now moving to the sales split by region and customer group on Page 5, please. You can see here that the overall distribution of group sales by region and customer segment continued to reflect investment hesitation among truck and trailer customers, particularly in North America, India and Asia. In this context, the EMEA region performed quite well, accounting for around 52% of group sales, supported by the acquisition-related contribution of Assali Stefen. The Americas region represented 37.1% of total sales, while the APAC share declined to 10.9%, mainly due to the softer demand of Asian trailer manufacturers with end customers in the U.S. as well as a weaker mining business.
Looking at the split by customer segment, you can see that OE sales declined by 6.9% year-over-year to EUR 246.7 million, driven by the overall weakness of the CV market. Within this, the trailer OE segment accounted for 48.1% of third quarter sales, up by 1 percentage point due to the stronger performance in EMEA. The truck OE segment with a strong exposure to the Americas, was more impacted by the uncertainties related to the U.S. trade policy. In contrast, the aftermarket business once again proved resilience, declining by only 2.5% to now EUR 170.5 million and underlines the continued robustness and stabilizing nature of our aftermarket operations. As a result, the aftermarket business contributed 40.9% of group sales in the third quarter of this year.
So speaking about -- having spoken about the different regions and the summary, we come now to the single regions and starting with EMEA on Page 6, please. Here, you can see that the top line development in the EMEA region showed a return to positive growth, supported by slightly improving demand from both trailer and truck customers in recent months. And as a result, sales increased organically by 5.6% in Q3. The aftermarket business remained broadly stable compared to the prior year, continuing to provide a solid foundation for the region. In addition, Assali Stefen, as said before, contributed a low single-digit euro million amount to sales in the third quarter, following its first-time consolidation at the end of July '24. For the first 9 months of '25, total sales in EMEA were 3.1% below the prior year's level, reflecting an organic decline of 7%.
Looking ahead, while the recent positive order momentum is not expected to continue at the same pace, current volumes remain sufficient to ensure efficient capacity utilization. On the earnings side, adjusted EBIT grew to 8.2% in Q3, mainly driven by better fixed cost absorption and higher utilization levels. And as a result, profitability for the first 9 months of this year stood at 7.8%, including a onetime FX valuation effect from Q1.
Moving to Americas on the next page, please. Here, in addition to the cyclical downturn in the North American CV markets, demand for both trucks and trailer remained subdued, primarily due to the ongoing uncertainties surrounding the U.S. trade policy. In contrast, the aftermarket business once again demonstrated its robustness and resilience. And as a result, organic sales in the third quarter declined by 7.9% year-over-year, while negative currency effects further reduced sales by around 5.7%.
Overall, third quarter sales in the Americas were 13.6% below the previous year, contributing to a 14.4% decline over the first 9 months of '25. In addition to the lower top line, earnings were a little bit impacted by additional procurement-related costs linked to the U.S. tariff situation amounting to a net effect of a low single-digit euro million figure. While initial compensating effects from price adjustments were already visible, the regional teams are now working for further -- to further mitigate the impact of the Section 232 tariffs, which came into effect at the end of August. Consequently, adjusted EBIT decreased by 22.2% year-over-year, resulting in a still double-digit adjusted EBIT margin of 10%. And looking ahead, we expect that the tariff-related cost burden on the procurement side to be largely compensated, among other measures through pricing and efficiency measures in the coming months. So for the first 9 months of '25, adjusted EBIT totaled EUR 53.1 million, which equals to a margin of 10.6%.
So last but not least, coming to APAC now. And here, I can say that the market environment in APAC remained uneven and overall subdued, particularly in those segments that are strategically important to us. While the Indian domestic trailer market achieved moderate growth despite the usual slowdown during the monsoon season, unfortunately, customers in Vietnam and Thailand with end users in the U.S. continue to show purchasing restraints due to the uncertainty surrounding the U.S. trade policy. As a result, sales in the third quarter of this year amounted to EUR 45.5 million, representing a 21.5% year-over-year decline, which equals an organic decrease of 13.9%. And also here, in addition, negative foreign exchange effects reduced sales by a further 7.6% year-over-year.
On the earnings side, the decline in profitability was mainly due to the lower top line, particularly in higher-margin markets. Nevertheless, despite continued market softness and tariff-related uncertainties, we maintained a solid adjusted EBIT margin of 10.8%, making the 11th consecutive quarter with a double-digit profitability. So overall, we closed the first 9 months of '25 with a robust adjusted EBIT margin of 11%.
And having said this, I hand over to Frank for the key financials.
Okay. Thank you, Alex, and hello to everybody on the line. As usual, let me start with a short overview on the EBIT to adjusted EBIT reconciliation for the group on Page 10. Our reported EBIT for the third quarter of 2025 declined by 21.7% to EUR 28.9 million, mainly reflecting a lower top line as well as some additional tariff-related expenses.
Total adjustments for restructuring and transaction costs amounted to EUR 3.8 million in Q3, primarily related to the integration expenses from recent acquisitions and expenses for the restructuring of production and logistic processes in North America and EMEA. These measures include, among other things, expenses for the footprint optimization in North America. In this context, we are relocating part of our production from Dumas to the new plant in Rowlett, Texas. In addition, depreciation and amortization from purchase price allocations were, as usual, adjusted accordingly and totaled to EUR 5.4 million. As a result, we achieved an adjusted EBIT margin of 9.1% for the third quarter, while the adjusted EBITDA margin for Q3 remained robust at 13.2%, nearly reaching the prior year level.
Moving on to Page 11, where you see the bridge from EBIT to basic earnings per share. As mentioned earlier, EBIT amounted to EUR 28.9 million for the third quarter of '25. By implementing targeted measures to reduce FX valuation effects, mainly from intercompany financing and benefiting from a favorable euro-U.S. dollar exchange rate, we were able to avoid any material valuation impacts in Q3. In addition, besides the improvement of the EURIBOR versus prior year, we further optimized our financing structure, leading in total to a 17% reduction of interest expenses compared to the prior year. As a result, the finance result, which had been significantly burdened by FX effects last year, improved to around EUR 8 million in Q3 2025.
Income taxes also declined significantly, partly because the prior year quarter was negatively impacted by catch-up effects from previous periods. As a result, the overall tax rate stood at 33.9% for Q3 and 35.8% for the first 9 months of 2025. Overall, reported EPS improved by 49.4% to EUR 0.31 in Q3, reflecting these positive financial developments despite the weaker top line. Using the new calculation method for the distribution relevant profit for the period, this would correspond to a distribution relevant EPS of [ EUR 1.07 ] for the first 9 months of 2025.
Moving to Page 12, where you see the development of the equity ratio. Compared to year-end 2025 -- 2024, equity decreased by 9.5%, respectively, EUR 49.9 million to EUR 477.2 million, mainly due to the dividend payment of around EUR 39 million as well as negative valuation effects amounting to around EUR 37 million. Since the balance sheet in total increased by 3.9%, the equity ratio declined to 26.9%.
Turning to Page 13. I would like to speak about net working capital development. Net working capital at the end of September 2025 was influenced by several factors. As the OE business remains subdued, the aftermarket business, which generally required higher inventory levels continued to be relatively strong. In addition, we adjusted our net working capital management proactively as a precautionary measure in light of the ongoing trade policy uncertainties, and we built some additional stock buffer related to the relocation of production from -- in the U.S. from Dumas to the Rowlett plant in Texas. As a result, net working capital increased by 11.2% to EUR 297.3 million compared to the end of December and included factoring of EUR 34.8 million.
Moreover, it also reflects the usual seasonality in trade payables and trade receivables. Consequently, the net working capital ratio stood at 18.7% of sales, also reflecting the overall lower last 12 months top line development. By year-end, we expect to return to our target corridor of 16% to 18%.
And now let me address the cash flow development in Page 14. After generating net cash flow from operating activities of EUR 30.5 million in the first half of the year, we achieved an additional EUR 48.8 million in the first quarter. For the first 9 months of 2025, this results in a total of EUR 79.3 million. Compared to prior year, this development was primarily driven by lower EBITDA and a higher net working capital level, reflecting the current market environment, as explained before. However, this impact was partly offset by lower tax payments. Investments in property, plant and equipment and intangible assets totaled EUR 31.7 million, representing 2.5% of group sales. As in the first half of '25, these investments focused on further automation and modernization of production processes, preparations for the new plant in Rowlett, Texas and capacity expansions for air disc brake and localization of fifth wheel production at Duzce in Turkiye.
Moving on to an overview of the leverage development on Page 15. Despite the refinancing measures implemented in recent months, the net debt-to-EBITDA ratio remained unchanged at 2.4x at the end of September compared with the end of June. The increase versus year-end 2024 was primarily driven by higher net debt, including around EUR 20 million in lease liabilities related to the new Rowlett plant, which is scheduled to open in the coming months.
Net debt also rose due to the financing of net working capital, as explained before. The dividend payment as well as the purchase price payment for the remaining 40% stake in the Haldex joint venture in India. EBITDA declined to EUR 227.5 million, reflecting a stable margin at lower sales caused by the current market conditions. Excluding the IFRS 16 effect, our leverage would amount to only 2.2x.
Looking ahead, we expect to gradually reduce leverage in the coming quarters, supported by further operational measures. Our target remains to bring leverage step-wise below 2x over the coming quarters.
Before I hand over to Alex, let me shortly also comment on the recently announced share buyback program on Page 16. Following our successful implementation of a group-wide cash pool and hence, the concentration of our cash flows in recent quarters as well as the elimination of all debt maturities until 2027, we see this as the right time to initiate a share buyback program, reflecting our confidence in SAF-Holland's financial strength and long-term value creation potential. We, therefore, plan to invest a total of up to EUR 40 million in the repurchase of our own shares. Along that program, we will acquire up to 5% of the outstanding shares as treasury shares, probably starting at the end of this month or earlier and continuing until the end of next year. To this end, we intend to renew the authorization for share repurchases at the 2026 Annual General Meeting. We are convinced that this share buyback represents an attractive investment and a clear signal of our confidence in the company's long-term growth potential. Our liquidity position remains strong, supported by a successful cash pooling and solid financing with no outstanding maturities before March 2027.
And with that, I hand back to Alex.
Yes. Thank you, Frank. I'm on Page 18, showing the '25 forecast for the trailer and the truck markets. Here, you can see that between January and September, the truck and trailer markets were particularly affected by the investment hesitancy, driven by the ongoing uncertainties surrounding the U.S. tariff policy, especially in North America and Asia, as explained before. We continue to expect that both the truck and trailer markets in North America will decline by 20% to 30% compared to the previous year's level, with the truck markets likely to trend towards the lower half of this range and the trailer market towards the upper half of that range. Expectations for the Brazilian CV market remain unchanged, but thanks to our strong positioning in steering axles and trailer equipment with such components, we are less exposed to the weaker market development. So we are growing against the market.
In contrast, the Chinese CV markets have gained positive momentum, supported by government stimulus programs, and we now expect both segments to increase by 10% to 20% year-over-year. Our outlook for the Indian domestic trailer market remains unchanged with an expected development between flat to minus 5% compared to '24, implying a strong recovery in demand during the fourth quarter. In EMEA, we have slightly adjusted our expectations. Following a phase of positive order momentum in recent months for both truck and trailer, order activity did not continue that pace. Overall, as communicated last week, these regional developments and market trends have led us to adjust our '25 sales guidance.
So next slide, please. And in light of the market developments just outlined, we have revised our group sales guidance and now expect group sales between EUR 1.7 billion and EUR 1.75 billion for the full year of '25. Given the ongoing challenging market environment and moderate order expectations for the coming months, we have, in line with our Drive 2030 strategy, initiated an efficiency program aimed at further optimize our organizational SG&A structure. In this context, additional adjusted expenses in the high single-digit euro million range may be incurred by the end of the year. Last but not least, the forecast for the adjusted EBIT margin and CapEx ratio remain unchanged.
So let me briefly summarize the key takeaways for the third quarter on Page 20, please. First, the ongoing trade policy uncertainties continues to weigh on global CV markets. The tempered investment sentiment in the U.S. also affected the trailer demand in Southeast Asia. Nevertheless, despite these external headwinds, our solid underlying profitability once again demonstrates our operational discipline across the entire organization. And after a rather subdued cash flow performance in the second quarter, we were able to return to a strong level of free operating cash flow in the third quarter, even against the backdrop of continued net working capital development. And looking ahead, while we expect order momentum to remain moderate over the coming months, we are proactively addressing this through continued strict cost management and further efficiency measures, particularly within the indirect workforce, so SG&A.
And ladies and gentlemen, this concludes the presentation. I guess we can now start with your questions. So operator, the first question, please.
[Operator Instructions] And first up is Nicolai Kempf from Deutsche Bank.
2. Question Answer
It's Nicolai from Deutsche Bank. Two on my side. First, on the share buyback, I think it's something that is appreciated by the capital markets, and it's also shown by the share price reaction in the last 2 days. I'm just wondering, does the share buyback now limit your M&A activities, or is it just an additional tool to allocate cash to shareholders? And my second one, a bit of housekeeping. It's on the free cash flow in Q3 and the others plus EUR 13 million. Can you just give a bit more color what's behind this?
I will take it. Thanks, Nicolai. First of all, as mentioned, the share buyback, we came in a really good position with the cash full implementation to having a centralized amount of cash available. And in terms of capital allocation, there are a lot of opportunities. We are convinced that share buyback is the best one for the time being as we also have no refinancing requirements. And from the total amount talking about EUR 40 million in the next 13 months, this does not burden us in any financing of potential M&A. So no change in the Drive 2030 strategy. We are focusing on external growth, looking for M&A targets and continuing as presented in our Capital Markets Day. So no change at all. Then related to the cash flow improvement in the third quarter. Talking as a CFO, it came late. I would have appreciated to see this already in the second quarter. It's getting net working capital somehow under control, having a strong cash-related operational performance, so strong EBITDA generation, no additional investment in net working capital, and this is then finally ending up -- also cautious investment in CapEx, this is ending up in the numbers you see.
Okay. But do you know what the others is referring to in this case? On Slide 14.
Yes. The other position normally is a change in accruals that if it's yes, -- basically, it's a change in our accrual positions.
Next up is Klaus Ringel from ODDO BHF.
It's three on my side. One would be a follow-up to Nicolai's questions on the share buyback program. Do you intend to cancel the shares that you have bought back? That's the first one. Maybe let's take it one by one.
Yes, I can take this. As mentioned, we will take the shares as treasury shares, and we will not cancel them.
Okay. Second one is, yes, maybe an early question, but your view on the North American transport market going into next year. Is it fair to expect a stabilization, or might we even see a slight year-on-year growth there next year?
Well, I would like to take that, Klaus. This is Alex speaking. We do not expect that the market further drop. It already bottomed trailer for sure, and truck also went down drastically over the last couple of quarters. Well, we have changes -- we see changes in the tariff policy every other day, and it's really hard to predict what's going to happen next month. So basically, we saw that the tariff war with China now, as it looks like, got stabilized with the 50%, 55% tariffs implemented for Chinese goods being imported into the U.S. We don't know what's going to happen with Canada and with Mexico in the future. So it's really hard to predict anything. The only thing I can tell you is that the other countries in the Americas like Canada, Mexico, Brazil doing okay for us. I'm not super happy if I'm okay with that development. It's quite stable. The one market which is suffering a lot is the U.S. market. And I'm talking to a lot of customers, both OE manufacturer, but also fleets. They have a lot of cash available. And due to the uncertainty at the moment, they are really hesitant in investing more and more. There is no need for new equipment. I can -- do not -- I cannot give you really a good question what's going to happen in '26. We hope that the markets are going up. We are ready for that. We did our homework with plant consolidations and new equipment installation. We can scope with an increase. But I guess it has a bottom up, and it can only get better.
Okay. That's clear. And the last one would be on the, yes, additional efficiencies or the new efficiency program that you spoke about. Can you give an indication of the cost impact or the, let's say, amount of savings you're expecting from that?
Well, we are further consolidating plants in different areas of the world. And we are already implemented a structural change of SG&A in the third quarter, which will be impacting us a little bit in the last quarter of this year, but mainly in next year. So we have to work on our overall SG&A rate, which is for the sales we are doing now, in my point of view, too high. So we're not talking a blue collar, we are talking a white collar. We put departments together and get more leaner in all respects of the organization in all the regions, but also in the headquarter, and this is what we are going to do. I said before, this might have an impact in the high single-digit million euro range by the end of the year, but we have to do that to get prepared, to also make sure that the profitability in the years to come will be even better than at the moment.
Next up is Yasmin Steilen from Berenberg.
I have two left. So the first one coming back to the U.S. market. So we've heard from most OEs that the idle production in September and November again. So have we also seen idling in November? And what are your expectations on the winter break? Might we see some kind of extensions there? And if the OE market remains weak, when could we expect the aftermarket to significantly improve? And maybe on the legislation emission, legislation changes in the U.S., is there any update from your side what your expectations are? And then finally, could you provide an update on the progress of the expansion of the disc brakes into the trucks business? So what's the current status after the first production ramp-up with your European customer in Q4 last year?
I would like to take the question in terms of the order income. Well, in November, we do not -- cannot speak about November, but we do not see a significant drop of orders coming in, in EMEA. In the U.S., it's still, as I said before, it bottomed, okay? So order intake is there, but it's not really super good. So we do not see a big increase now in December and January. From what I see in EMEA, our customers, both truck and trailers and mainly trailer is our big sales contributor in EMEA, they do close 2 to 3 weeks, which is the normal closure period in the Americas. I can report that we have talks with a couple of truck manufacturers, but also trailer manufacturers. And some of them, they are closing 2 weeks, the other 3. The most I heard was closing that they do close the last 2 weeks in December and the first 2 weeks in January. But in average, I would say they're going to close 3 weeks by the end of the year with New Year's Eve. So no longer closures, so to say. In terms of the legislation changes with the Euro 6 in U.S., we do not hear anything new. We are in constant dialogue with the official authorities. I think only the government, Mr. Trump, knows what's going to happen. But at the moment, I cannot report any news regarding this. We hope that we get some news in beginning of next year, how it's going to look like by the end of '26 would be good to have some presales already in '26. At air disc brake, I can report that we are -- we started already Q4 '24 as reported before to a major truck manufacturer in Europe. We got some new inquiries for quotation for other brake specifications, not only from that truck manufacturer, but from two other truck manufacturers in Europe. And also, we are in the process of releasing our brakes with three truck manufacturers in the U.S. That's a constant process we are following. It's not overnight, but we see the first signs of success here. And we also are talking with another truck manufacturer, actually with two truck manufacturers in China. We got some orders for trailer brakes, but also for truck brakes, we increased our capacity for another model also in China. And there are rumors and talks that the government might change the legislation soon that all trucks have to be equipped with air disc brake in China. If this is true, we are ready now. And yes, we have a dedicated plan for this in [ Suzhou, ] which is in China. So we are ready for that. And this is also one of the big pillars in the future, not only to do -- to increase OE sales to our truck customers, but also then get more aftermarket sales in the coming years.
Does that help?
Yes, perfect.
Next in the line is Jorge González Sadornil from Hauck Aufhäuser Investment Banking.
Can you hear me?
Yes, good morning.
Sorry, I have also a few questions on your look for next year. Sorry about that. My first question is about the EMEA market. So I saw the demand, at least in Spain is quite strong. So I'm wondering if Germany with your comments that now the demand is not that supportive, is maybe in a wait-and-see approach due to the potential support from the government at some point next year and on relation on the infrastructure investments. Do you see some kind of postponements because of this because maybe the stocks are already at good levels and your clients want to wait for more clear programs to enjoy the support, or it is just related to the economy? That will be my first one, please.
Well, that's not an easy question. I try to answer that as best as I can. I can confirm that the Spanish market is developing quite well. They had a double-digit increase in percentage in trailer registrations. We are one of the main suppliers to Spain, also supplying the big ones. Here, I can confirm that we got an increase in orders, and we see that, and they already developed for the whole year quite well. And about Italy, I have to say they are not too bad developing, so quite good. Well, the -- I wouldn't say the pool house, but the market which is really under the bus at the moment is Germany, I have to say that. And if the German government would be much faster in decision-making. And also then after they have taken the decision to bring them up to speed, that would be much of a help. So they freed up a lot of money for infrastructure projects. We don't see that that much at the moment to happening because they have to free the money and then they have to do all the requests for quotations and the bidding process, and it takes a very long time. We see a little bit more request for quotations coming in on the military side, specifically for low beds, heavy-duty equipment that's coming in. But also here, before the German government frees up the money and the decision has been made who gets the money for the investment. That takes too long, I have to say this. Other markets are doing okay. The biggest weak market we have at the moment, as I said, is Germany and here in particular, it's the curtain-sider business. And the curtain-sider standard business is very much impacted by the car manufacturing business, which dropped a lot. So a lot of Tier 1 and Tier 2 suppliers, they do not have many orders from the car manufacturers. So it's much lower than before, and this triggers the orders for the curtain-siders. We're lucky as the curtain-sider business is in the hands of a handful of the biggest players in Germany, where we do not have a lot of share. I have to say, we are very big in tippers in coolers and in small other trailers. And here, the market is okay. But we are also waiting for the infrastructure programs, the military spend and also the curtain-sider business coming back.
Okay. That's helpful. So we can say that taking into account the situation in Germany, we are in Germany and in these countries -- in the Central Europe at low levels already at maintenance kind levels for demand, or this is difficult to say?
No, we are in Germany. Well, Germany is the biggest market and Germany has some of the biggest manufacturers in Europe, of course, of trailers and everybody is in a waiting mode to get free cash out of the infrastructure programs from the government and the military spend. It's -- I repeat myself, the government is far too slow, and they are just waiting to spend the money. But once it's coming, should be much better. I heard yesterday that the GDP growth for Germany is expected to be 0.9% for '26. That's not super good. At least it's not a further drop. But it's -- in my point of view, it has bottomed. Well, we have to wait what's going to happen with the spending.
Okay. Then for the U.S. market, I was hearing yesterday from [ Daimler ] Truck that they expect the recovery to be backloaded in the second part of next year in U.S. It's true that the truck is always more related to new regulations. But what is your view for the trailer? Are you expecting if the tariff volatility ends, and we have some clear scenario. Are you expecting the trailer to benefit a little bit from the delays in truck, or do you think the situation is similar and the clients will keep waiting? How do you see the different levels of investment for these two types of products?
Money is available. As I said before, I talked a lot to truck OEs to trailer OEs and fleet, they're saying, well, we have to renew the fleet. We are waiting for, let's say, a certainty in the market, not having a government going back and forth every other day because you cannot base your decisions made on tariffs being 15% one day, then 50% the other day and 125% the other day, that doesn't make sense. The trailer market is the lowest I have ever seen in the last 25 years in -- basically in the U.S., I said before, the other countries are doing quite okay. But the U.S. market is really down in trailers being in certain segments, being down 50%, 60% that's unbelievable, and there is still a hesitancy to go the first step and invest on the truck side, which also accounts for about 50-50 of our OE sales, so 50% truck. As I said before, we are working on getting more orders for truck suspensions, where we can grow further and also the air disc brakes where we would like to grow further. We saw some positive signals coming in already, but it's far too early to say it's getting better next year. But to summarize, truck, we have to see. Maybe there is a good signal where the new legislation might kick in '27, so there will be a prebuy in '26 in trailer market, I really expect that the market will be better next year because it bottomed up already.
That's great. And finally, my very last one. I'm curious on India. If we take out the share of exports to other countries in South Asia that at the end are producing for U.S. If we focus on India market itself, what do you see for next year? Do you see an acceleration or the country is still difficult to forecast at this point?
Well, if we take our export sales mainly to Southeast Asia, so we had a couple of customers, they bought a lot of actual suspensions from us for container chassis being supplied to U.S. customers that stopped completely. The import duty on complete container chassis or trailers manufactured in Vietnam, I think it's more than 500%. For components, it's 46%. And if I'm not mistaken for complete trailers, it's 500%. So basically, those customers are out of the game unless there will be a new agreement with the U.S. government. But if you take those export sales out to those customers, we slightly grew over the last couple of months. We also will be growing a little bit moderately in the last quarter in India, and we hope that our internal demand will be higher in '26 than it was in '25. We don't see a declining domestic market in India because also here, it's lower or it's on the -- we just discussed that a couple of hours ago with our team. It is on the '22, so 2022 level, which was low to medium. And of course, we also did some initiatives to grow, and it's not only our company, York anymore, but also on the Haldex side, we invested quite a lot in new product lines. So also here, we would like to grow, but the biggest contributor is York with the axles and suspensions. And here, we expect a slight increase for the domestic Indian market in next year.
So next up is Holger Schmidt from DZ Bank.
I have two questions left. The first is on the pricing environment with low demand and intensifying competition, how do you see the competitive environment developing? And are you seeing rising price pressure? The second question is at the Capital Markets Day in the beginning of the year, you outlined that you are looking to tap into adjacent markets. Could you give us an update on your efforts and progress in this regard?
Yes. Let me start with the price pressure before we come to the Capital Markets Day and M&A with Frank answering this. While there is always a price pressure, okay? Everybody would like to fill the production facilities. We are working two shifts. That's our -- basically our sweet spot. We are not working Sundays and night shifts where we have to pay a premium, specifically here in EMEA. We have all our production facilities under control. In the U.S., it's a little bit more under pressure since both truck and trailer is really down at the moment. But also here, you can see we came in double digit also in Q3 with the lowest sales quarter for the last, I think, 3 years, where we have seen, so everything is under control. We initiated our SG&A initiatives to further reduce our overall cost with being in effect in 2026. So from that perspective, it's okay. From a price pressure, there is always price pressure. But you have to talk with your customers, we are not selling by price, we are selling by features. We are the lightest in the industry when it comes to axles, have premiums. Our fifth wheel business state is good for both on-road and off-road. So one part number for both. We are the only ones providing that. This is why we still have a very high market share. And I cannot report anything unusual in price pressure because this is ongoing in good years and even in bad years, where the markets are down or up, that's a standard daily business we have to deal with.
Yes, exactly. We have stable margin and keeping or gaining market share globally. So there's no price pressure basically.
And we don't see any change in the behavior of your competitors.
Well, they also need to make some money at the end. And please recall the split between OE and aftermarket. We are at 40-60 at the moment. Following our conversations in the last couple of years, well, and I grew up in the aftermarket, that's our profitability business, we are making sure with that we come in now with 9.3% hopefully, for the whole year. So that supports us. The perfect split is 1/3 aftermarket, 2/3 OE. We still have -- even if OE now jumps up, we still have a good share of aftermarket, which is the stabilizing factor of our company, and we don't see a change of behavior. We had a lot of Chinese companies coming into Europe. Most of them have withdrawn because they don't make any money and selling a component once it's easy fill by price, but second, time, it's quite difficult because you have to have the service, the parts available. That's an infrastructure you have to build up in decades. It took us more than 40 years to build up our aftermarket structure in both areas, the big ones, EMEA and also in Americas. You cannot cope that overnight in a couple of years. Yes, we have seen a lot coming in trying to sell by price, but they all disappeared again.
And taking your second question related to the entry or growth in adjacent markets and industries. As presented in the Capital Markets Day, we have two initiatives. One is the internal initiative to build on our position we have already with Orlandi in the agriculture business, bringing in additional components, especially from Haldex that are good products for agriculture. This is something where we are working on. We have a project team pushing this. It takes time to enter into these markets, but we are convinced and our targets are unchanged for the organic part of the adjacent industry growth. And the second is the external growth for sure, as we know that our core markets are consolidated, and it's hard to do bigger M&As in our core business. We are looking especially into adjacent industries related to agriculture, to grain business, whatever. And this is a big portion of our M&A activity and scanning of companies that we are looking into. So unchanged.
And well, we are in talks. Of course, we cannot speak about whom we are talking, but we also have to make sure that we are not going to overpay for companies we might acquire in the future, and it has to make sense also from a scale perspective and from a synergy perspective. It doesn't make sense to add another EUR 10 million or EUR 20 million here and there. We are in talks. And as soon as something is going to happen, we will inform you, of course, officially with an external information.
The next question comes from Miro Zuzak from JMS Invest.
Can you hear me?
Yes.
Yes.
I have three questions. The first one regarding the Americas regions and especially South America. We learned from competitors of yours that they are gaining market share, organic growth up 8% or 6% in the quarter, new customers ramping up and so on. Is it -- are these market share gains against you or against other players? Because I see your sales are down. I don't know the split between North America and South America. But are you -- is this a reason for the soft Americas Q3 results that you have presented?
Well, I'm not sure if any of our competitors are reporting in both first North America and then South America. I think they also only reporting Americas. There might be the case that they are growing a little bit in agribusiness, which they acquired a couple of companies before. We cannot see that we are losing market share. In some segments, we are a little bit increasing. Specifically, as I mentioned before, Brazil went down in both trailer and truck market. We are coming out this year better than last year. We are planning also an increase in Brazil for next year. So far, I can already see because we ramped up a couple of new production -- product groups in the last two years. We even increased our capacity in our plant in the south of Brazil. So from that perspective, we are targeting bus, truck and trailer segments, and specifically, the bus segment is running well. I have to say that. But from the other product groups, I don't see that because we have our output. We see the data of build rates and our build rates, so we don't see that. There might be that another competitor lost some market share because most of the components were coming from China. And as we know, China got a huge hit in tariffs. That might be the cause. Most of the components we are getting for the U.S. maybe are not coming from China. It's just a small percentage share of our components we are using made in China. So from that perspective, we did not get a huge hit. Of course. We got some hit, as I reported before, with the tariffs implemented, we passed those on to our customers. A little portion is still remaining, and we hope that until the end of the year, we can also fill that gap with the increase in our sourcing spend. But from a market share gain, I cannot confirm that we are the ones lost any business.
Okay. Very clear. Second question regarding your guidance, EUR 1.75 billion is the upper end. Against the backdrop of your comments in the call and also the Q3 numbers presented, is it still realistic to get to the EUR 1.75 billion, or is this rather, let's say, the profitability higher that basically the outcome will be rather in the middle or maybe even a bit the lower range of the guidance.
Well, Miro, I cannot comment on this because we just went out with this range. This range was also triggered by our huge FX loss. Just give you a gut feeling for this. If you see the FX losses per year, if they weren't there, then we didn't have to do our talk, and it is in the ballpark of...
Would have been basically in our...
EUR 50 million, EUR 60 million of just FX loss mainly coming from the U.S., but also from India. We have already the numbers for October. They were okay for us. And we are now down the road middle of November, end of December, we are pretty confident that we do not have to adjust it further time. This guidance, we are cautious, but I'm not commenting if it will be now EUR 1.750 billion or whatever. The range is EUR 1.7 billion to EUR 1.75 billion, and the rest I leave to the imagination.
EUR 50 million is fair call for high market.
Okay. So worth a try maybe. Just one further question and then I step back into the line. Regarding the cost and the cost seasonality, I think you did a great job on the costs on all three lines, selling, administrative and also R&D. Now I went back in my model back a couple of years to understand the seasonal patterns, and I actually didn't recognize any. So in some years, you had like larger Q4 cost compared to Q3. And in other years, we had lower Q4 costs compared to Q3. This year, what is your forecast regarding the cost lines versus Q3 in terms of seasonality? Do we see like an increase again in Q4, or do you think you can maintain this excellent level that you have presented in Q3?
So we don't give a forecast for cost by quarter. I think if you take our full year EBIT guidance of around 9.3% and the 9 months EBIT of 9.3% of sales, then that's what you should take into your model. We should not -- we will not give any more details on that related to seasonality.
So we are quite confident that the reason why we did not change the adjusted EBIT guidance for this year that we will hit the guidance. So we can also not comment on the seasonality of Q4. I would say that. Typically, OE sales is a little bit lower because of the end year closure in all the areas, mainly in Europe and in the Americas. And you have some more days off in the U.S. you have the aftermarket. It's a little bit less than last year, but the people are still a little bit cautious and watch the cash they are having. So there is no big development.
Okay. I see we have no more questions in the line and also time is basically over. Thank you, everyone, for your questions. The Investor Relations team is available in case of you have any follow-up questions. And we will be on the upcoming conferences, as usual, available and maybe some road shows. And having said this, have a good day, and bye-bye.
Thank you.
Financial data from SAF Holland
Revenue
Revenue is the sum of all sales generated by a company, e.g. for its products or services.
Revenue (TTM) metric explainedDirect Costs
Direct costs are the costs incurred directly in connection with the manufacture of the product or service.
Gross Profit
Gross Profit indicates how much of the revenue remains in the company after deducting direct production costs. If the percentage share of sales is calculated, this is referred to as the gross margin.
Gross Profit metric explainedSelling and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) include all expenses for marketing and sales as well as the general administration of the company.
Research and Development Expense
Research and development costs (R&D) provide information on how much the company invests in the research and development of its products. The costs are particularly interesting as a percentage of revenue and in comparison to direct competitors.
EBITDA
EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization) is the company's earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. The EBITDA margin is calculated as a percentage of sales.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation represents reductions in the value of the company's assets (e.g. due to wear and tear on machinery).
EBIT (Operating Income)
EBIT (Earnings Before Interest and Taxes) is the company's profit before interest and taxes, also known as the operating income. The EBIT Margin is calculated as a percentage of sales at
.
Net Profit
Net Profit represents the profit or loss after deduction of all costs.
Net Profit metric explainedStocksGuide Premium
| Jun '26 |
+/-
%
|
||
| Revenue | 1,748 1,748 |
0%
0%
100%
|
|
| - Direct Costs | 1,363 1,363 |
0%
0%
78%
|
|
| Gross Profit | 386 386 |
3%
3%
22%
|
|
| - Selling and Administrative Expenses | 221 221 |
2%
2%
13%
|
|
| - Research and Development Expense | 35 35 |
3%
3%
2%
|
|
| EBITDA | 220 220 |
6%
6%
13%
|
|
| - Depreciation and Amortization | 86 86 |
6%
6%
5%
|
|
| EBIT (Operating Income) EBIT | 134 134 |
6%
6%
8%
|
|
| Net Profit | 69 69 |
34%
34%
4%
|
|
In millions EUR.
Don't miss a Thing! We will send you all news about SAF Holland directly to your mailbox free of charge.
If you wish, we will send you an e-mail every morning with news on stocks of your portfolios.
SAF Holland Stock News
Company Profile
SAF-HOLLAND SE engages in the manufacture and supply of systems and components for commercial, public, and recreational vehicles. It operates through the following segments: EMEA, Americas, and APAC/China. The EMEA segment includes manufacture and sale of axles and suspension systems for trailers and semi-trailers as well as fifth wheels for heavy trucks. It also provides spare parts for the trailer and commercial vehicle industry. The Americas segment manufactures and sells key components for the semi-trailer, trailer, truck, bus and recreational vehicle industries. It also provides spare parts for the trailer and commercial vehicle industry, axle and suspension systems, fifth wheels, kingpins and landing legs as well as coupling devices. The APAC/China segment manufactures and sale of axle and suspension systems for buses, trailers and semi-trailers. The company was founded on December 21, 2005 and is headquartered in Luxembourg.
StocksGuide Premium
| Head office | Germany |
| CEO | Mr. Geis |
| Employees | 5,735 |
| Founded | 2005 |
| Website | safholland.com |


