SCHOTT Pharma Stock price
Compare with Peer Group
📊 Peer Group
📈 What is it?
The peer group consists of the companies with the most similar business model. They serve as a benchmark for putting a stock into context.
🧮 How is it selected?
Based on similarity of business model, meaning companies from the same industry with comparable products and a similar customer base. That's the only way to compare apples to apples.
🏛️ Why does it matter?
Whether a stock is cheap or expensive is best judged by comparison. A P/E of 18 or an EV/FCF of 20 can look cheap or expensive depending on the yardstick. The peer group gives you the most accurate one: companies with a similar business model that operate under the same conditions.
🎯 What does it mean for investors?
When a metric sits below the peer average, the stock is valued more cheaply relative to its competitors, and above the average more expensively. A discount to the peer group can be an opportunity, but it can also have a reason (for example lower growth). The comparison is a starting point, not a verdict.
AI Insights on SCHOTT Pharma
Insights
Invest better with AI
StocksGuide Unlimited – full access to AI analyses
👉 More detailed insights
👉 Exclusive perspectives on opportunities & risks
👉 Clear answers to your questions
Invest better with AI
StocksGuide Unlimited – full access to AI analyses
👉 More detailed insights
👉 Exclusive perspectives on opportunities & risks
👉 Clear answers to your questions
Invest better with AI
StocksGuide Unlimited – full access to AI analyses
👉 More detailed insights
👉 Exclusive perspectives on opportunities & risks
👉 Clear answers to your questions
Invest better with AI
StocksGuide Unlimited – full access to AI analyses
👉 More detailed insights
👉 Exclusive perspectives on opportunities & risks
👉 Clear answers to your questions
Is SCHOTT Pharma a Top Scorer Stock based on the Dividend, High-Growth-Investing or Leverman Strategy?
As a Free StocksGuide user, you can view scores for all 9,127 stocks worldwide.
StocksGuide Premium
StocksGuide Unlimited
Key metrics
📘 Market Capitalization
📈 What is it?
Market capitalization shows how much a company is currently worth on the stock market.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It helps classify companies by size (Large, Mid, Small Cap) and indicates their market presence and relative stability.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Large-cap companies tend to be more stable, often pay dividends, but may grow more slowly.
- Smaller firms may offer higher growth potential but come with more volatility.
- Market capitalization is a useful indicator of company size — but not a measure of whether a stock is undervalued or overvalued.
📘 Enterprise Value (EV)
📈 What is it?
Enterprise Value represents the total cost to acquire a company — including its debt and excluding its cash reserves.
🧮 How is it calculated?
(= Market Cap + Net Debt)
🏛️ Why is it important?
EV gives a more complete picture of a company's value than market cap alone and is used in key valuation ratios like EV/FCF or EV/Sales.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Enterprise Value shows the true cost of buying a company, including all financial obligations.
- It is more accurate than just looking at market cap, especially when comparing companies with different levels of debt or cash.
- Professional investors prefer EV-based multiples because they better reflect the company’s full financial footprint.
📘 Net Debt
📈 What is it?
Net Debt shows how much debt remains after subtracting a company’s available cash reserves.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It indicates how dependent a company is on borrowed money and how easily it can service its debt in the short term.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Low or negative net debt signals financial strength and flexibility.
- Companies with strong cash positions are better positioned in crises.
- High net debt increases financial risk — especially in environments with rising interest rates or economic downturns.
📘 Cash
📈 What is it?
Cash represents all liquid assets a company can access immediately — including cash, bank deposits, and short-term investments.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It reflects a company’s financial flexibility and resilience — enabling investments, buybacks, or buffer in downturns.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A strong cash position means greater room for maneuver and crisis resistance.
- Cash-rich companies can invest, pay down debt, or repurchase shares.
- But excess idle cash might indicate a lack of growth opportunities.
📘 Shares Outstanding
📈 What is it?
Shares outstanding represent the total number of a company’s shares currently held by investors — excluding treasury stock.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It’s the basis for key metrics like Earnings Per Share (EPS), Market Capitalization, or the Price/Earnings ratio (P/E).
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Fewer shares in circulation typically increase earnings per share — making each share more valuable.
- Share buybacks reduce the number of shares and boost per-share metrics.
- Issuing new shares does the opposite — diluting shareholder value and lowering per-share figures.
📘 Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E)
📈 What is it?
The P/E ratio shows how many times a company's earnings per share are reflected in its current share price — in other words, how "expensive" the stock appears relative to its profits.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
The P/E ratio is one of the most widely used valuation metrics. It helps investors assess whether a stock appears cheap or expensive compared to its earnings power.
🧮 Calculation
📊 P/E (TTM) = Based on earnings from the last 12 months (Trailing Twelve Months):🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low P/E may indicate undervaluation — or signal underlying issues.
- A high P/E may reflect strong growth expectations — or an overvalued stock.
📘 Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S)
📈 What is it?
The P/S ratio shows how much investors are paying for $1 of the company’s revenue – regardless of profitability.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
P/S is especially useful for evaluating growth companies or businesses not yet profitable. It reflects how the market values the company’s sales.
🧮 Calculation
Market Cap = €3.71b | Revenue (TTM) = €1.02b
Market Cap = €3.71b | Estimated Revenue = €1.06b
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low P/S may indicate undervaluation — or low profitability.
- A high P/S can reflect strong growth expectations — or excessive optimism.
- Especially helpful when evaluating companies where profits are low, volatile, or negative.
📘 Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales)
📈 What is it?
EV/Sales shows how much investors are paying for $1 of revenue — considering not just equity, but also debt and cash. It’s the capital structure–adjusted version of the P/S ratio.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It’s ideal for comparing companies with different levels of debt. It reflects a company's true cost relative to its revenue.
🧮 Calculation
Enterprise Value = €3.75b | Revenue (TTM) = €1.02b
Enterprise Value = €3.75b | Forward Revenue = €1.06b
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- EV/Sales allows for capital structure–neutral company comparisons.
- A lower ratio may indicate undervaluation; a higher one may signal strong growth expectations or overvaluation.
- Especially helpful when evaluating high-growth companies with low or negative earnings.
📘 Enterprise Value to Free Cash Flow (EV/FCF)
📈 What is it?
EV/FCF shows how many years it would take for a company to "pay back" its enterprise value using its free cash flow.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It focuses on real cash generation, ignoring accounting noise — ideal for assessing profitability and value based on liquidity, not earnings.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low EV/FCF may signal undervaluation and strong cash generation.
- A high EV/FCF might reflect weak recent cash flow or aggressive growth expectations.
- Best suited for stable, mature businesses with predictable free cash flows.
📘 Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B)
📈 What is it?
The P/B ratio compares a company’s market value to its book value — showing how much investors are paying for each dollar of net assets.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
P/B is commonly used for asset-heavy industries like banks or industrials. It helps assess whether a stock is trading above or below its net asset value.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A P/B below 1 may signal undervaluation — or weak profitability.
- A P/B above 1 implies the market expects future value creation (e.g., brand, IP, growth).
- Best used for companies with tangible assets and strong balance sheets.
📘 Dividend per Share (DPS)
📈 What is it?
Dividend per Share shows how much cash a company pays out to shareholders for each share they own – usually on an annual or quarterly basis.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
DPS is the absolute value of the payout per share – crucial for income-focused investors and dividend strategies.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A stable or growing DPS often signals a strong, shareholder-friendly business.
- DPS alone doesn’t tell you how attractive the payout is – the stock price also matters (→ see Dividend Yield).
- Long-term dividend growth is often a hallmark of high-quality companies – like the dividend aristocrats.
📘 Dividend Yield
📈 What is it?
Dividend yield shows how large a company’s dividend is in relation to its current share price.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It allows investors to compare dividend payouts across stocks, regardless of price or payout size.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A stable yield can reflect reliable distributions.
- Comparing 1Y and 5Y yield shows whether dividend growth keeps pace with stock price appreciation.
- A low yield isn’t always negative – it can signal strong past performance or growth focus.
📘 Dividend Growth
📈 What is it?
Dividend growth shows how much a company has increased its dividend per share over time.
🧮 How is it calculated?
5Y: Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR)
🏛️ Why is it important?
Consistently rising dividends are often a sign of financial strength and shareholder orientation – especially relevant for long-term investors.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Stable dividend growth is a sign of sustainable earning power.
- High dividend growth can significantly boost your total return:
- If a company pays $1 in dividends and increases it by 15% annually over 5 years, you’ll receive $2 per share in year 5 – twice as much as at the start!
📘 Payout Ratio
📈 What is it?
The payout ratio shows what percentage of a company’s earnings (per share) is distributed to shareholders as dividends.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It helps assess whether the dividend is sustainable – especially in relation to the company’s profitability.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low payout ratio means the company retains more earnings for reinvestment – typical for growth companies.
- A moderate payout (e.g. 25–50%) indicates a healthy balance between returns and reinvestment.
- High payout ratios may seem attractive but can carry risk if earnings decline.
📘 Consecutive Dividend Increases
📈 What is it?
This metric shows how many consecutive years a company has raised its dividend per share – without any cuts or pauses.
🧮 How is it calculated?
(Special dividends are not considered.)
🏛️ Why is it important?
A long track record of increases reflects financial strength, consistency, and shareholder commitment.
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A long dividend increase streak builds confidence – especially in volatile markets.
- Such companies are seen as reliable and income-friendly investments.
- The longer the streak, the stronger the company’s dividend discipline.
📘 Revenue
📈 What is it?
Revenue shows how much a company earns in total from selling its products and services – the gross income before any costs are deducted.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Revenue is one of the key figures to assess a company’s size, market position, and growth potential.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Growing revenue indicates rising demand and can be an early signal of future earnings growth.
- Comparing actual and expected revenue reveals trends in the market environment and analyst sentiment.
- Note: Strong revenue alone isn’t enough – margins and profitability matter just as much.
📘 EBITDA
📈 What is it?
EBITDA stands for “Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization.” It reflects a company’s operating profit before the effects of financing, taxes, and accounting depreciation.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
EBITDA is widely used to evaluate a company’s operating performance – especially across capital-intensive sectors or international comparisons.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high or growing EBITDA indicates strong operational profitability – independent of taxes, interest, or accounting methods.
- It’s especially useful for comparing companies across sectors or geographies.
- Important: EBITDA is not a net income figure – it excludes key costs like depreciation and interest.
📘 EBIT
📈 What is it?
EBIT stands for “Earnings Before Interest and Taxes.” It reflects a company’s operating profit after depreciation, but before interest and tax expenses.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
EBIT is a core profitability metric that shows how well the company performs in its main business operations – independent of capital structure and tax environment.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high EBIT indicates strong profitability from the company’s core business – before financial and tax effects.
- It allows better comparison between companies with different debt levels or tax structures.
- Compared to EBITDA, EBIT already accounts for depreciation and reflects capital intensity more clearly.
📘 Net Income
📈 What is it?
Net income is the company’s total profit – the amount left after all expenses, taxes, interest, and depreciation have been deducted.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Net income is the most comprehensive measure of a company’s profitability – showing how much actual profit remains after all business and financing costs.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Growing net income indicates that the company is managing all of its costs efficiently.
- It directly influences valuation metrics like P/E ratio and the company’s dividend capacity.
- Over time, net income trends reveal how resilient and profitable the business model really is.
📘 Free Cash Flow (FCF)
📈 What is it?
Free Cash Flow shows how much actual cash remains after a company covers its operating expenses and capital expenditures.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
FCF reflects a company’s real financial strength – regardless of accounting profits. It shows how much flexibility a company has for dividends, share buybacks, or debt reduction.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- High free cash flow means the company generates real, usable cash – independent of reported net income.
- It’s often the most reliable base for sustainable dividends and buybacks.
- Declining FCF can be an early warning sign – even when profits appear stable.
📘 Revenue Growth
📈 What is it?
Revenue growth shows how much a company’s sales have changed compared to the previous year – both on a trailing basis (TTM) and based on forward projections.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Forward = (Expected revenue ÷ Revenue in prior year − 1) × 100
Forward growth is based on analyst estimates for the current fiscal year.
🏛️ Why is it important?
Rising revenue signals growing demand, business expansion, and market share gains – especially important for growth-oriented companies.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Growth is the engine of long-term value creation – especially in tech and growth sectors.
- What matters is not just current growth, but its sustainability.
- Forward projections reflect whether analysts expect continued momentum – or a slowdown.
📘 EBITDA Growth
📈 What is it?
EBITDA growth shows how much a company’s operating profit (before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) has increased or decreased compared to the previous year.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Forward = (Expected EBITDA ÷ EBITDA from prior year − 1) × 100
The forward estimate is based on analyst projections for the current fiscal year.
🏛️ Why is it important?
Growing EBITDA indicates improving operational profitability – regardless of financing or accounting effects.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Strong EBITDA growth signals operational efficiency and scalability – especially during growth phases.
- EBITDA growth can be an early indicator of margin and earnings expansion – but should be assessed alongside revenue and EBIT.
📘 EBIT Growth
📈 What is it?
EBIT growth shows how much a company’s operating profit (after depreciation, but before interest and taxes) has increased compared to the previous year.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Forward = (Expected EBIT ÷ EBIT from prior year − 1) × 100
The forward estimate is based on analyst projections for the current fiscal year.
🏛️ Why is it important?
EBIT growth is a direct indicator of a company’s business performance – taking into account capital intensity through depreciation.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Rising EBIT signals improving operating profitability – even after accounting for depreciation.
- It’s especially important for evaluating companies with significant capital expenditures.
- Combined with revenue and EBITDA growth, EBIT growth provides a well-rounded view of operational progress.
📘 Net Income Growth
📈 What is it?
Net income growth shows how much a company’s bottom-line profit has increased or decreased compared to the previous year – both on a trailing basis (TTM) and based on analyst projections.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Forward = (Expected net income ÷ Net income from prior year − 1) × 100
The forward estimate reflects analysts’ expectations for the current fiscal year.
🏛️ Why is it important?
Net income is the ultimate measure of profitability. Growing net income signals stronger efficiency, cost control, and sustainable earnings power.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Stronger net income boosts valuation, dividend potential, and investor confidence.
- If profits stall while revenue grows, it may signal margin pressure.
📘 Free Cash Flow Growth
📈 What is it?
Free cash flow (FCF) growth shows how a company’s available cash – after covering operating expenses and capital expenditures – has changed compared to the previous year.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Free cash flow reflects real financial strength. Growing FCF indicates more flexibility for dividends, share buybacks, and reinvestment.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Declining FCF may point to rising investments, increasing costs, or weaker operating performance.
- Especially for dividend investors, FCF growth is critical – since dividends are paid from actual available cash.
- A negative trend isn't always bad, but it deserves closer attention.
📘 Gross Margin
📈 What is it?
Gross margin shows how much of a company’s revenue remains after deducting the direct costs of goods sold (like materials and production). It represents the company’s “raw profit” before fixed costs, taxes, and interest.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Or simply: Gross Margin = Gross Profit ÷ Revenue × 100
🏛️ Why is it important?
Gross margin indicates how efficiently a company can produce or procure what it sells. It is a key measure of product-level profitability and pricing power.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high gross margin suggests strong pricing power and efficient production.
- Falling margins may signal rising input costs or competitive pressure.
- Compared to peers, gross margin offers insights into the quality of a business model.
📘 EBITDA Margin
📈 What is it?
The EBITDA margin shows how much of a company’s revenue remains as operating profit before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization.It reflects operating efficiency without being distorted by financing or accounting factors.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
The EBITDA margin reveals how much operating income a company generates per dollar of revenue – independent of capital structure and tax effects.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high EBITDA margin reflects strong core profitability – before accounting distortions.
- It allows for effective comparisons across companies and sectors.
- A stable or growing margin signals efficient cost control and business scalability.
📘 EBIT Margin
📈 What is it?
The EBIT margin shows what percentage of revenue remains as operating profit after depreciation but before interest and taxes.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
The EBIT margin reflects a company’s core profitability while accounting for capital intensity (e.g. machinery, infrastructure). It’s especially useful for comparing businesses with different levels of depreciation.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high EBIT margin shows that the company remains efficient even after factoring in depreciation.
- It’s especially relevant for capital-intensive industries.
- Stable or rising EBIT margins over time are a strong indicator of pricing power and business quality.
📘 Net margin
📈 What is it?
Net margin shows how much of a company’s revenue remains as bottom-line profit after deducting all costs, interest, taxes, and depreciation.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Net margin reflects a company’s overall efficiency – across operations, financing, and taxation. It shows how much actual profit is generated from each dollar of revenue.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high net margin means the company is not only strong operationally but also manages financing and taxes efficiently.
- Peer comparisons reveal business quality and competitiveness.
- Declining margins despite revenue growth can be a red flag for rising costs or inefficiencies.
📘 Free cash flow margin
📈 What is it?
The free cash flow (FCF) margin shows how much of a company’s revenue remains as actual free cash after covering all operating expenses and capital expenditures.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
This margin reflects the true liquidity generated by the business – independent of accounting rules or depreciation. It’s especially relevant for dividends, buybacks, and reinvestment decisions.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high FCF margin means a company consistently generates strong cash flow.
- It’s a positive signal for financial stability and shareholder returns.
- The long-term trend is key – a declining margin may indicate rising investments or weakening operating efficiency.
📘 Equity Ratio
📈 What is it?
The equity ratio indicates what portion of a company’s total assets is financed by shareholders’ equity – in other words, how much it relies on its own capital.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
A high equity ratio reflects financial strength and stability, especially during downturns. It’s a key indicator of a company’s solvency and long-term risk profile.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Companies with high equity ratios are generally more resilient and less dependent on external debt.
- Low equity ratios can signal higher risk or aggressive financial strategies.
- Important: Always assess the equity ratio in combination with the return on equity (ROE). This shows not just how stable the company is – but also how efficiently it uses shareholder capital.
📘 Return on Equity (ROE)
📈 What is it?
Return on equity (ROE) shows how efficiently a company uses its shareholders’ equity to generate profit. In other words: how much net income is earned per dollar of equity.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
ROE is a core profitability metric. It helps investors understand whether a company delivers attractive returns on the capital provided by its shareholders.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high ROE indicates that the company is using its capital efficiently and profitably.
- It’s especially meaningful for capital-intensive businesses or firms with high equity bases.
- Important: A very high ROE can also result from high debt levels – always interpret it alongside the equity ratio to assess financial health.
📘 Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
📈 What is it?
ROCE measures how efficiently a company generates profits from its total capital – including both equity and interest-bearing debt.
🧮 How is it calculated?
It evaluates the return on all capital employed, regardless of how it’s financed.
🏛️ Why is it important?
ROCE is ideal for comparing companies with different financing structures. It shows how well management uses capital to create value for both shareholders and creditors.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high ROCE means the company uses its capital efficiently – regardless of whether it's funded by debt or equity.
- The higher the ROCE compared to peers, the more value the company creates with its invested capital.
- Especially relevant for capital-intensive sectors like industrials, energy, or infrastructure.
📘 Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
📈 What is it?
ROIC measures how efficiently a company generates returns from the capital invested in its core operations – regardless of whether the capital comes from equity or debt.
🧮 How is it calculated?
- NOPAT = Net Operating Profit After Taxes
- Invested Capital = Operating assets minus non-interest-bearing liabilities
🏛️ Why is it important?
ROIC is one of the most accurate indicators of capital efficiency. Unlike return on equity, it is not distorted by leverage and shows how much value is created for all capital providers.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high ROIC shows how effectively a company uses the capital that is truly invested in its core operations.
- Unlike ROCE, ROIC focuses only on the capital that is actively used to run the business – and that requires a return (i.e. interest-bearing).
- Especially useful when comparing companies with large amounts of excess cash or non-interest-bearing liabilities – giving a more realistic picture of capital efficiency.
📘 Leverage Ratio (Debt-to-Equity)
📈 What is it?
The leverage ratio indicates how much a company relies on interest-bearing debt (such as loans and bonds) relative to its shareholders’ equity.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
This ratio helps assess a company’s financial structure and risk profile. High leverage can enhance returns – but also increases exposure to interest rate changes and financial stress.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low leverage ratio signals financial strength and independence.
- A higher ratio can improve returns in good times but increases risk during downturns or rising interest rate periods.
- 👉 Always interpret in the context of industry, capital intensity, and interest rate environment.
📘 Earnings per share (EPS)
📈 What is it?
Earnings per Share (EPS) shows how much profit is attributable to a single share – and is one of the most important metrics for evaluating a company's performance.
🧮 How is it calculated?
The diluted share count reflects potential new shares that could be issued through options, convertible bonds, or other rights.
🏛️ Why is it important?
EPS is the basis for many key valuation metrics like P/E ratio, PEG ratio, or payout ratio. It enables comparisons of profitability across companies, regardless of their size.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- EPS captures per-share profitability and is especially useful for comparisons over time or with analyst estimates.
- Rising EPS may signal consistent growth or share buybacks.
- Important: Always use diluted EPS for more realistic valuations – especially in companies with stock-based compensation.
📘 Free cash flow per share (FCF per share)
📈 What is it?
Free Cash Flow per Share shows how much free cash flow a company generates per outstanding share – after investments, but before dividends or debt repayments.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Free cash flow is calculated as operating cash flow minus capital expenditures (CapEx).
🏛️ Why is it important?
FCF per Share reveals how much real cash is available per share – useful for dividends, buybacks, or reducing debt. Unlike net income, free cash flow is harder to manipulate and often seen as a more reliable metric.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- High FCF per share signals strong financial flexibility.
- It shows how much capital the company can effectively reinvest or return to shareholders.
- Particularly relevant for dividend payers and capital-efficient businesses.
📘 Short interest
📈 What is it?
Short interest indicates how many shares of a company are currently sold short – that is, borrowed and sold by investors who expect the price to decline.
🧮 How is it calculated?
It reflects the percentage of a company’s shares that are being shorted relative to the total shares available.
🏛️ Why is it important?
Short interest serves as a sentiment indicator: A high value may signal skepticism or bearish expectations – but also increases the potential for a short squeeze if prices rise unexpectedly.
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Low short interest usually indicates market confidence in the company.
- High short interest can be a warning sign – or an opportunity if sentiment shifts.
- Especially relevant in volatile markets or ahead of key earnings releases.
📘 Employees
📈 What is it?
The employee count shows how many people a company employs worldwide – offering insights into its size, structure, and business model.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It helps assess operational scale, labor intensity, and cost structure. Combined with revenue and profit, it enables key metrics like revenue per employee or productivity.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high headcount can signal operational complexity – but also significant growth capacity.
- Revenue per employee is a key indicator of efficiency.
- Especially useful for comparing tech, industrial, or service-heavy companies.
📘 Turnover per employee
📈 What is it?
Revenue per employee indicates how much revenue a company generates on average per employee – a key measure of efficiency and productivity.
🧮 How is it calculated?
The employee count is typically taken from the most recent annual report.
🏛️ Why is it important?
This metric helps compare business models – especially between labor-intensive and technology-driven companies. A high value suggests automation, operational efficiency, or strong value creation per head.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high revenue per employee indicates a scalable and margin-strong business model.
- A low figure may reflect labor-intensive operations or lower value-add.
- Especially helpful when comparing tech companies to industrial or service sectors.
SCHOTT Pharma Stock Analysis
Analyst Opinions
19 Analysts have issued a SCHOTT Pharma forecast:
Analyst Opinions
19 Analysts have issued a SCHOTT Pharma forecast:
SCHOTT Pharma Events
Past Events
|
AUG
12
Q3 2026 Earnings Call
about 2 months ago
|
|
MAY
13
Q2 2026 Earnings Call
5 months ago
|
|
FEB
11
Q1 2026 Earnings Call
8 months ago
|
|
DEC
11
Q4 2025 Earnings Call
10 months ago
|
StocksGuide Free
SCHOTT Pharma — Q3 2026 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
[Audio Gap] gentlemen, and welcome to SCHOTT Pharma's Earnings Call for the Third Quarter and the First 9 months of 2026. The conference will be recorded. [Operator Instructions]
Let me now turn the floor over to your host, Tobias Erfurth.
Thank you very much, Eliza, and good morning to everyone on the call. Welcome to our 9 months third quarter conference call for the financial year 2026. My name is Tobias Erfurth, Head of Investor Relations and Communications, and I will be guiding you through today's session. With me are our CEO, Christian Mias; and our CFO, Reinhard Mayer. Christian will begin with a business update, followed by Reinhard, who will walk you through our financial performance in more detail. After that, we will open the call for your questions.
Before we kick off, please take a moment to review our disclaimer on Slide #2. It covers our standard safe harbor language for forward-looking statements. And as a reminder, our financial year 2026 runs from October 2025 to September 2026. The 9 months results we are presenting today cover the period from October to June 2026.
With this, I would like to hand over to Christian. Please go ahead.
Yes. Thank you, Tobias. Good morning, everyone. Let me open with a headline. Q3 was a strong quarter, and it demonstrates that our growth trajectory is intact. Group revenue in Q3 reached EUR 282 million, representing growth of 8.3% at constant currencies. EBITDA for the quarter came in at EUR 75 million, which corresponds to a solid margin of 26.8%. Our high-value solutions revenue share amounted to 59% in Q3 and was thus in line with our midterm targets of reaching a 60% revenue share.
Both segments contributed to the Q3 momentum. What I would like to stress here is that the higher demand was broad-based across our portfolio. So we are not talking about single customers' applications or products, but healthy portfolio-wide dynamics.
Let me now turn to Slide 5 for a closer look at the strategy execution. Our high-value solutions business is the engine of SCHOTT Pharma. HVS represents 57% of our revenues. This reflects consistent execution across our 3 strategic pillars: innovation; capacity expansion; and trusted partnerships with the world's leading pharmaceutical companies as well as solution and development partners.
The commercial logic is straightforward. High-value solutions address structural and growing customer needs, complex biologics, GLP-1 therapies, the shift to homecare and self-administration and the industry-wide adoption of ready-to-use formats as part of the manufacturing transformation. These dynamics translate into stronger pricing, better margins and more resilient customer relationships. As said, our midterm target is a 60% HVS revenue share, and we are on track.
Slide 6 covers 3 developments that illustrate how we are strengthening our position as a trusted long-term partner. First, as already communicated in our ad hoc release in early July, we have reached a mutually beneficial agreement with a key glass syringe customer. It includes both compensation as well as revenue-related components, which will have an impact on future periods. This agreement is a very good example of the strength and resilience of our customer relationships, and it reflects our shared commitment of creating long-term value as trusted partners.
Second, also in July, we announced the result of an expanded collaboration with Nemera, a specialist in drug delivery devices. Together, we have verified the compatibility of Nemera's pen injector platform with our 3 ml ready-to-use cartridge system. Pharmaceutical companies benefit from a ready-made solution that speeds up time-to-market and helps avoid technical problems that are common in such combination products. Patients, on the other hand, benefit from a safe system of self-injection. So the offering plays directly into the shift toward a at-home treatment, which is a trend we are seeing accelerate.
Third, we have created the new role of Chief Commercial Officer. Fabian Stocker takes on this position while keeping his responsibilities as Head of the DCS segment. Fabian has been with SCHOTT for 14 years, 10 of which are spent at SCHOTT Pharma with a strong track record in developing our DCS business. With the implementation of his new role, we are strengthening our customer centricity through greater collaboration across departments and product groups, making sure that customers get exactly what serves them best with respect to products and services.
These three examples share a common logic. Proximity to customers is a competitive advantage from how we negotiate as partners, how we innovate to how we approach the market.
Before I hand over to Reinhard, let me briefly summarize the status of our expansion projects. In the United States, we have brought significant additional capacity for core and specialty vials into operation, also in sterile quality. The expansion contributes to our long-term local-for-local strategy, strengthening our presence in the important U.S. market. With the tripling of local capacities for high-value solutions, we are addressing key trends in the pharmaceutical industry, such as manufacturing shift and the rise of biologics. At the same time, we contribute to a resilient healthcare infrastructure, also in the case of medical emergencies such as pandemics.
In Hungary and Switzerland, the ramp-up for sterile cartridges is progressing. Both investments strengthen our HVS platform and increase our readiness to meet future demand, particularly for homecare solutions.
With that, I hand over to Reinhard for a financial update.
Thank you, Christian, and a warm welcome also from my side. Let me take you through the 9 months numbers and more importantly, what is driving them. On Slide 9, I will start with revenues. Q3 first, then the 9 months picture. A quick note on the chart. Gray bars represent our Drug Containment Solutions segment, DCS, and the blue bars represent Drug Delivery Systems, DDS.
In Q3, group revenues amounted to EUR 281.8 million. That represents a growth of 8.3% at constant currencies and 10% on a reported basis. Both segments contributed to this acceleration. In Q3, DCS continued its strong growth trajectory as revenues grew to EUR 158.9 million. This was up 10.8% at constant currencies or 11.3% on a reported basis compared to the prior year quarter. Growth was driven by continued high demand for sterile cartridges, specialty vials and ready-to-use formats. We also saw good momentum in our core vials business, reflecting continued healthy demand beyond the HVS portfolio.
DDS in Q3 showed an encouraging recovery. Revenues increased to EUR 123.2 million, notably up from EUR 113.5 million in the prior year. This represents a meaningful recovery versus the first half of the year. Two dynamics drove this: sustained strong demand for prefillable glass syringes, especially for GLP-1 medications; and an increasing momentum in polymer syringes outside of mRNA applications.
Turning to the 9-month period. Group revenues amounted to EUR 769.8 million, resulting in a year-on-year growth of 4.4% at constant currencies and 4.1%, as reported. DCS revenues for the first 9 months reached EUR 445.3 million, an increase of 9.2% at constant currencies and 7.6%, as reported. Growth was driven by the same factors as Q3: sterile cartridges and vials; specialty vials; as well as an improved demand for our core vails business.
In DDS, reported 9 months revenues were EUR 325.1 million, essentially flat compared to EUR 325.7 million in the prior year and slightly down 1.7% at constant currencies. This reflects the weaker H1, which was primarily driven by lower polymer syringe volumes for mRNA applications.
Now let's dive into our profitability. In Q3, group EBITDA amounted to EUR 75 million, corresponding to a margin of 26.8%. This compares to a particularly strong margin of 32.3% in Q3 2025, which benefited from high margins in both segments, supported by a favorable mix and strong utilization. In contrast, the current quarter profitability was impacted by continued lower utilization in the DDS segment as well as costs related to infrastructure and process optimization measures in production.
For the 9-month period, group EBITDA reached EUR 205.3 million compared to EUR 213.3 million in the prior year, a decrease of 3.8%. The EBITDA margin was 26.7% compared to 28.9% in the 9 months of the financial year 2025.
Let me explain what drove this margin development. The 9 months margin development reflects the Q3 factors just mentioned. In addition, the inventory impairment on customer-specific glass syringes reported in the first half also weighed on profitability. Our EBITDA after 9 months was impacted by extraordinary specific items. They are not reflective of underlying structural margin pressure.
Looking at the segments. DCS EBITDA grew faster than sales, rising 10.1% to EUR 109.7 million for the 9 months. The margin improved to 24.6% from 24.1% in the prior year. Volume growth and a positive product mix with increasing HVS penetrations drove this outperformance. The HVS share in DCS reached 25%, up from 23% in the prior year.
DDS EBITDA for the 9 months was EUR 95.7 million, down 16.3% from EUR 114.4 million. The margin was 29.4% compared to 35.1% in the prior year. As mentioned, this reflects 3 factors: lower utilization; the Q3 infrastructure and process optimization costs; and the glass syringe impairment from the first half. The underlying DDS business remains well positioned.
Now a few lines further down the P&L. Depreciation and amortization increased by 14.2% to EUR 65.5 million. This reflects our ongoing growth investments and was entirely expected. As a result, the EBIT decline was somewhat larger than the EBITDA movement, bringing EBIT to EUR 139.7 million.
The financial results improved significantly by 35.6% to minus EUR 6.2 million. This reflects lower interest expenses following the optimization of our financing structure, a meaningful step forward. Income taxes were EUR 30.2 million, corresponding to an effective tax rate of 22.6%. This is in line with our communicated expectations. Overall, net income for the 9 months amounted to EUR 103.4 million, down 9% year-on-year. Earnings per share were EUR 0.68 compared to EUR 0.75 in the prior year.
Now let me turn to the cash flow. Cash flow from operating activities for the 9 months came in at EUR 140.7 million. Free cash flow improved by 49% year-on-year to EUR 58.9 million, up from EUR 39.6 million in the same period last year. This improvement was benefited from working capital changes, lower tax payments and the optimization of our financing structure.
Capital expenditure for the 9 months was EUR 82.5 million, slightly below the prior year level of EUR 89.3 million. We have continued our investment program in both segments with particular focus on HVS capacity at our sites in Switzerland and Hungary, while improving cash conversion. That combination demonstrates the financial discipline underpinning our growth.
Based on our 9 months performance and our continued positive order book development, we confirm our updated guidance for the full financial year 2026. As communicated on July 8, we raised our revenue growth guidance to 5% to 6% at constant currencies, up from the prior range of 2% to 5%. We expect an EBITDA margin of 27% to 28%, up from the previously guided around 27%. This upgrade was supported by Q3 momentum and today's results confirm that the positive dynamics continue.
For additional context, we continue to expect capital expenditure in the range of EUR 140 million to EUR 160 million. We expect our HVS revenue share to remain at the prior year level of 57% for the full year.
With our guidance confirmed and Q4 already well underway, let me briefly touch on the fourth quarter. As our guidance implies, we expect revenue growth to slightly accelerate in Q4 compared to 9 months of 2026. And as you know from the previous years, Q4 is seasonally weaker for the DD -- the DCS segment. This will again be the case in Q4, so that DCS revenues likely come in below the strong level seen in Q3 2026. Good growth momentum in DDS should contribute meaningfully to the group's growth and coming clearly above the Q3 2026 level.
This concludes the financial update. And with that, I will hand it back to Tobias.
Thank you very much, Christian and Reinhard, for your presentation. We will now open the Q&A session. Eliza, our operator, will assist with the registration. Please go ahead.
[Operator Instructions]
I think we have the first people in line. We will start with Odysseas Manesiotis from BNP Paribas.
2. Question Answer
Firstly, could you share a bit more color on where the polymer strength is coming from and help us potentially with quantifying how significant that was perhaps in terms of sequential step-up from Q2, along with what you expect for that business in Q4?
Secondly, your full year margin guide implies quite a big step-up in Q4 margin if we assume we're landing at the midpoint, around 300 basis points in my numbers. Where should we think that comes from? Is it fair to think that this will be driven by the strength you're seeing in polymer given that's where underutilization has dragged you back a bit? Or should we assume that the lower end of the 27% to 28% range is more likely here?
And thirdly, one of your GLP-1 -- one of the GLP-1 market leaders recently booked notable termination fees because of the downsizing of large supplier contracts given lower volume expectations. Should we read this across as a risk to your midterm or full year guide?
Odysseas, thanks for the questions. Obviously, I mean, about polymer strength in the Q3, we have described that -- in the earlier quarters that we have basically seen a slowing decline of the mRNA volumes. And at the same time, we have seen an expanding increase of other applications, which are now in a position that we, so to say, compensate for the declining volumes on the mRNA polymer. And this will continue. We will not specifically describe how much more growth this will deliver. But obviously, the polymer strength continues and is broad-based on the five other applications we have within that, let's say, segment.
And then to the second part, yes, where comes the margin increase? And obviously, it will be a meaningful step-up in margin for the fourth quarter. And you mentioned, let's say, range is most probably not wrong. And I would also see that to be in that range, mainly driven by, as we said, a stronger portion of DDS growth, and that both supported by better utilization in our factories and also, let's say, a stronger polymer side in the segment. And that will help to drive the margin increase in Q4 over the first 3 quarters.
And I must ask you on the third question, I didn't quite get it. Maybe you can repeat this again?
Yes, of course. So we -- one of the GLP-1 market leaders recently booked notable termination fees because they downsized a few large supplier contracts given lower volume expectations. I was -- I wanted to ask whether that's a risk to your full year or midterm targets?
Understand. Well, obviously, we have highlighted that we have concluded with at least one of our large clients, a new contract, which, so to say, rebalances the contract to new terms. In that way, we will have similar structures like take-or-pay clauses in the contract. And in that consideration, we need to see, let's say, most of the large contracts. So far, we have, let's say, with that been able to deliver the growth and the margins as expected, and we foresee that to support our, let's say, midterm guidance, which we laid out beginning of the year and which is still intact and confirmed.
Next question comes from Giang Nguyen from Citi.
I have one follow-up on Odysseas's questions and then two of my own. I think Odysseas was asking whether the lower end of the 27% to 28% margin range is more likely here. I just wanted to double check that, that was your -- yes is the answer to that question?
And then two questions from me. The first one is, can you provide more color on the agreements with the specific glass syringe customers and whether there was any revenue or compensation that was recognized in Q3? Or is there anything that you're expecting to recognize in Q4 that could help explain part of the step-up? And then the second question is, can you quantify the costs associated with production infrastructure that you incurred in Q3? And what specifically were those related to?
Yes. Maybe I'll take the first one and Christian, you take the second and the third one. Obviously, Giang, I mean, I didn't say it's going to be lower end. The range is fully intact. And with that, I'll leave it really down to you. But we actually see a clear opportunity in the fourth quarter to substantially increase the EBITDA margin so far reached. Hence, we feel very well positioned to be in that range. So no lower-end perspective and not a higher-end perspective. The range is intact.
Yes. And Giang, coming to your second question regarding the agreement with our glass syringe customer, well, what basically Reinhard said before, we found an agreement that mainly is based on future revenues. And basically, you can say it's a take-or-pay agreement for the upcoming years. We will see first impacts in Q4 2026 and then in the years to come. And that basically underlines that we have found a strong agreement that both partners are going to benefit from.
Regarding the third question, when it comes to our production impact, well, we are constantly optimizing both our infrastructure as well as our production processes. And sometimes such optimizations do have an impact on the production process itself, which then is being seen as a temporary production inefficiency. And this is actually what we have seen in the last quarter. It is driven by our ramp-up activities on the one hand and the optimization activities on the other.
But what is also very important, the results that we have shown now are very well in line with our plan. And that means at the end, we are not talking about a structural issue. We are rather talking about isolated cases. And while we cannot fully guarantee with certainty that similar effects won't occur again, we believe we are on top of the specific issue.
Next question comes from Jonathon Unwin from Barclays.
I've got three, please. My first question is on the updated guidance for FY '26. You obviously upgraded that based on the renegotiation of contracts with your glass prefilled syringe customer. But I'm just wondering what level of expectation from that customer you had in your midterm growth target from this customer? And if you're lowballing expectations in the midterm and therefore, do you think it's now conservative based on the renegotiated contract plus the DCS strength that you're seeing?
My second question is actually on your Indian business, where I believe you're the #1 glass player in the region. I'm just wondering if you've seen a notable pick up in demand in that region since semaglutide went generic in the country? And is that mainly in vials?
And then my third question is on vials. Actually, it seems that vials are outperforming expectations after a couple of years of overcapacity and inventory in the market. So can you just talk a little bit about where the utilization of the vials business sits today? And are you getting closer to the sort of over 90% that you target on your other lines?
Jonathon, thank you. I will take your first question. And obviously, I mean, we had always said that this is an important client of ours, one of the larger ones and that 2026 represents a transition year where the impact is the most important one. And also so to say that there was a continuation of that customer relationship expected. Hence, a part of the midterm guidance included volume with this client, and that is more or less now confirmed. So no material change to what is embedded in the midterm guidance, hence, no rise out of, let's say, the new agreement towards the midterm guidance. But yes, there is an impact on 2026, which has led to the increase as well besides the strong momentum underneath all segments.
And Jonathon, regarding your second question and our Indian business, I would like to keep it short. I think we can confirm that the growth in the Indian business is well on track and according to our expectations or maybe a little bit above.
Now when it comes to your third question on the vials business, we do see a strong utilization of our vial capacities. As said earlier, we have now concluded the expansion of our facility in the U.S., especially with a focus on RTU vials. That means we are well positioned to serve the market with the increasing demand we are expecting.
Next question comes from Falko Friedrichs from Deutsche Bank.
I would have a follow-up first and then also two questions. And my follow-up is, could you potentially quantify how much of the 8% organic sales growth in Q3 was coming from this new agreement with the glass customer?
The next question is, taking a very early look at next fiscal year, is there any reason why growth should not be broadly in line with your medium-term guidance? And more specifically, are there any tailwinds or headwinds that we should keep in mind as we think about your growth progression into the next fiscal year?
And then my last question is, could you comment on the potential for further upside in your high-value solution product portfolio next year following the strong increase to 59% in Q3? Are there any additional opportunities to drive this share even higher? And what do you see as the key drivers for that?
Thank you, Falko, for your questions. And maybe I take the first two and Christian the third one. Okay. In Q3, Falko, there was no impact on growth out of the new agreement. We signed this agreement during July, and as said, then made the announcement then thereafter, was the first point.
To the second point, which is so to say, growth in 2027, I just want to remind you and the audience here, when we laid out the midterm guidance, 2% to 5% for 2026 and then 6% to 8% on top line growth, 27% to 29%, obviously, it was based on that, let's say, arrangement. With the agreement we have now with this large client, there will be obviously one compensation effect supporting the uptake in the fourth quarter. And that's, let's say, a specific one-timer, which will not repeat itself in 2027. But we will describe that effect when we report Q4. So overall, so 2027, all growth drivers are basically intact and structurally there, but we are not going to give a guidance now. Here, you need to wait until we have reported fourth quarter and give guidance for the next year.
And Falko, then coming to your last question regarding the further upside of HVS business. Well, in the upcoming year, we do expect a continuous growth of our glass syringe business, also -- not only, but also driven by GLP-1. And we expect, as mentioned earlier, further growth in polymer that should overcompensate slightly the reduction in mRNA, driven by different new applications, like, for example, aesthetics, IV, long-acting injectables. And if you take this all together, we feel we are on a good track to further increase our HVS share.
Next question comes from Charles Weston, Royal Bank of Canada, RBC.
So it's tradition to ask a follow-up first. So can I just follow on from Falko's question, please? You mentioned the Q4 kind of one-off that we will see. So can I just check that one-off is already included in your 5% to 6% guide for 2026, but that it creates a headwind for 2027 for the full year? Just trying to understand because obviously, we had lower revenues earlier in the year from the glass customer, which I thought might actually provide easier comps. So perhaps if you could just help clarify that?
And my second question relates to the new Hungary and Switzerland facilities. Just if you can give us a comment in terms of the progress of the ramp utilization and perhaps a sense of how much of those facilities are contracted already?
And my last question, please, on the DCS margin step down sequentially. I know margins vary a bit from quarter-to-quarter, but you obviously saw continued growth. So can you just comment on what drove that sequential decline?
Charles, thank you. I'll take the first one. And yes, there will be a one-off, which is actually a headwind. And actually, in that frame, I think it's okay to mention this. So we expect the one-off to be around EUR 15 million being, so to say, a contributor to growth in the upgraded guidance of this year, whilst this will be the headwind going forward versus the 2026 base. And then maybe, Christian, you take two and three, okay?
Yes, Charles, regarding Hungary and Switzerland, our ramp-up is actually in progress and according to plan. And I think I can, regarding utilization, only say that we will need the additional capacity in order to satisfy customer demands that we see coming or reaching us in the future. So we are well on track with our expansion projects.
And the last question, I have to admit, can you repeat that because it was difficult to understand here?
Sorry, it was just on the sequential decline in DCS margin from Q2 to Q3?
Okay. I'll take that. There is basically in -- when you look at DCS Q3 and compare that Q3 DCS margin 2025 to all the other quarters, you will realize it's a spike of margin increase there, especially in the gross profit margin driven. And that is due to a very, very strong quarter in, let's say, sterile solutions and that quarter with exceptionally high pricing was more specific projects we could realize then, has not repeated since then. So this is an anomaly which was driving the strong margin Q3 2025.
Sorry, the question was from Q2 2026 to Q3 2026?
Charles, I think this is mainly a topic of product mix that we see in the different quarters. So in Q3, the portion of high-value solutions was a little weaker than in Q2, but that's simply product mix in quarter-over-quarter comparison.
Next question comes from [indiscernible] from UBS.
I'd like to ask two questions on behalf of Olivier Calvet. The first one is around GLP-1 demand. And I wanted to ask if you're seeing any changes in customer order behavior by geography or format?
And the second question I'd like to ask, it's around investment opportunities. And while I recognize it's maybe like a bit too early to speak about CapEx for next year, I wanted to ask where do you currently see the higher return investment opportunities in the portfolio?
Maybe I'll take actually the first and the second question. Yes. GLP-1 demand basically is strong in the relevant growth regions and specifically strong on the glass syringe side, that I can say is that. So it's one of the drivers, and we are well positioned though in all formats, I must say, and all formats contribute well to the growth which we show.
And the second topic is, obviously, it's a little bit too early to speak about CapEx. In prior calls we [indiscernible] that, that 2027 we expect the CapEx level to be above 2026 levels. And then we expect CapEx levels to actually taper off then thereafter. And this we still confirm. We have a number of ongoing projects which we are going to conclude. We have also started, let's say, projects for the glass syringe business, for specialty vials expansion and our, let's say, existing expansions on ready-to-use cartridges and syringes are fully intact and on plan. So you should see, as said, a tapering off beyond '27 and '27 slightly above the levels of 2026.
Thank you very much. Well, thanks to all of you. I think we are at the end of our conference call as there are no more -- there's no more on the line. Thanks a lot to all the participants for being part of our 9 months Q3 results today. We look forward to seeing many of you in the upcoming investor conferences and roadshows in September, will be in New York, Toronto, Frankfurt, London and Munich, and we hope to see you there. Our full year results Q4 will be published in December 10. That's it for the moment.
Thanks for having us. Thanks for being with us. Enjoy the rest of the summer, and goodbye.
SCHOTT Pharma — Q3 2026 Earnings Call
Q3 showed healthy revenue and high-value solutions momentum, while margins lagged due to DDS underutilization and specific one-off items.
📊 Quarter at a Glance
- Revenue: Q3 EUR 281.8m (+8.3% YoY at constant currencies); 9M EUR 769.8m (+4.4% cc)
- EBITDA: Q3 EUR 75.0m, margin 26.8% (prior Q3 32.3%); 9M EUR 205.3m, margin 26.7%
- HVS Share: High‑value solutions 59% in Q3; 57% for 9M (midterm target 60%)
- Cash & CapEx: 9M free cash flow EUR 58.9m (+49%); 9M CapEx EUR 82.5m; FY CapEx guidance EUR 140–160m
🎯 What Management Says
- HVS focus: High‑value solutions (complex biologics, GLP‑1, homecare, ready‑to‑use formats) are the growth engine via innovation, capacity and partnerships
- Contracts & partners: Renegotiated a major glass syringe customer agreement with revenue/take‑or‑pay components; expanded collaboration with Nemera validated cartridge+pen compatibility
- Capacity build: New US vial capacity live; sterile cartridge ramps in Hungary and Switzerland; new Chief Commercial Officer to boost customer centricity
🔭 Outlook & Guidance
- Revenue guide: Upgraded to +5%–6% FY26 at constant currencies (confirmed)
- Profitability: EBITDA margin guided to 27%–28% for FY26; management expects a meaningful Q4 margin step‑up
- Capital plan: FY26 CapEx expected EUR 140–160m; HVS share for full year expected ~57%
- One‑off: Management flagged ~EUR 15m one‑off contribution to 2026 growth from the contract renegotiation (will act as a 2027 headwind)
❓ Analyst Q&A
- Polymer recovery: DDS improvement driven by polymer syringes outside mRNA; management declined to quantify exact sequential contribution but expects continuation
- Margin drivers: Q4 margin upside tied to higher DDS utilization and polymer strength; company did not commit to mid‑ or upper‑range but left guidance intact
- Contract timing & capex: Glass syringe agreement signed in July with impacts starting Q4; ramp of Hungary/Switzerland on plan and 2027 CapEx expected to be above 2026 then taper
⚡ Bottom Line
- Conclusion: Growth remains intact and HVS traction gives revenue quality; margins were pressured by DDS underutilization, inventory impairments and optimization costs but guidance was raised and cash conversion improved. Key near‑term watch items: Q4 margin delivery and the reversal impact of the ~EUR15m one‑off on 2027 comparables.
SCHOTT Pharma — Q2 2026 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the earnings call SCHOTT Pharma H1 2026. [Operator Instructions]
Let me now turn the floor over to your host, Tobias.
Thank you very much, Viara. Good morning, everyone, and welcome to SCHOTT Pharma's earnings call for the first half of financial year 2026. My name is Tobias Erfurth, Head of Investor Relations, and I will guide you through today's session. With me on the call are our CEO, Christian Mias; and our CFO, Reinhard Mayer.
As a reminder, and as announced in November 2025, Christian joined SCHOTT Pharma as new CEO on May 1. Christian, welcome once again. We are very happy to have you with us. And together with Reinhard, you bring extensive experience and fresh perspectives to SCHOTT Pharma. Christian will begin with a brief introduction and business update, followed by Reinhard, who will walk you through our financial performance in more detail. After that, we will open the call for your questions.
Before we begin, please take a moment to review our disclaimer. As a quick note, our financial year 2026 runs from October 1, 2025, to September 30, 2026. So the H1 results we are presenting today cover the period from October 1 last year to March 31 this year.
With this, I would now like to hand over to Christian. Christian, the floor is yours.
Thank you for the introduction, Tobias. And yes, good morning, everyone. It's a pleasure to join you today for the first time as CEO of SCHOTT Pharma. I'd like to take the opportunity to briefly introduce myself before we turn to the business update. I studied in Berlin in Tokyo and received a PhD in industrial engineering. My professional career then started at Siemens, where I worked in M&A and project management, an experience that has shaped how I think about strategy and operational performance to this day. From there, I joined SCHOTT where I have spent more than 18 years in leadership roles across Brazil. the United States and Germany. I led the tubing plant in Rio de Janeiro, restructured the American plants of Flat Glass and headed the Lighting & Imaging division. Most recently, I was responsible for electronic packaging, driving global performance, strategic development and cultural change.
So while SCHOTT Pharma is a new chapter for me, SCHOTT itself is not I know the culture, I know the people, and I have a deep appreciation for what this organization is capable of. I'm very much looking forward to what lies ahead and to getting to know many of you better over the coming months.
And now let us directly jump into the business update on Slide 5. SCHOTT Pharma delivered a resilient performance in the first half of the financial year 2026. Overall, both quarters developed in line with our expectations. Revenues for the first half reached EUR 488 million, representing growth of 2.3% at constant currencies. Growth was mainly driven by our Drug Containment Solutions segment while Drug Delivery Systems faced temporary headwinds.
Coming in at EUR 130 million, our EBITDA remained at a high level, corresponding to a margin of 26.6%. The strong contribution from DCS largely offset the temporary pressure in DDS. Demand for High Value Solutions remained robust throughout the period with HVS increasing year-over-year by 1 percentage point to a revenue share of 56%, in line with our plan.
Let's now take a closer look at that. The continued growth of our High Value Solutions reflect the strength of our strategy built on 3 pillars: innovation, capacity expansion and long-term partnerships with the world's leading pharmaceutical companies as well as industry peers for product development. As just mentioned, HVS account for 56% of our revenues impacted by a temporary decline in DDS. The commercial logic is straightforward. High Value Solutions address specific and evolving customer needs, growing regulatory requirements, complex biologics, the trend towards home care settings and the industry-wide shift toward ready-to-use formats for leaner and more efficient fill and finish processes. That translates into stronger pricing, better margins and more resilient customer relationships.
Shown on Slide 7 is the most recent example of innovations we are bringing to market. At the end of April, we announced the upcoming launch of cartriQ BioPure, which is a new sterile glass cartridge based on the new FIOLAX glass for the safe storage and delivery of complex biologics also for self-injection systems. It directly addresses 2 of the most important trends in our industry. The ongoing growth of complex and highly sensitive biologic therapies and the shift towards subcutaneous self-administration at home. Detail about the product features. However, the slide demonstrates that what looks like a simple glass container comprises a great deal of know-how and engineering that is not visible to the naked eye.
These features make a big difference to customers as they solve urgent pain points such as long-term drug stability accurate dosing, reliable integration into various self-administration devices and plungers that provide a good balance between integrity and smooth injectability. We are planning to bring cartriQ BioPure to market by the end of 2026. Just as we do in research and development, we also focus on High Value Solutions in the expansion of our manufacturing capacities. In the reporting period, we continue to invest particularly at our sites in Switzerland and Hungary for glass syringes and RTU cartridges to ensure we can serve the growing demand for sophisticated primary packaging also going forward.
With that, I hand over to Reinhard, starting on Slide 9 for our financial update.
Thank you, Christian, and a good day to everyone. I'm pleased to walk you through our financials for the first half of 2026 in more detail. A brief note on the chart structure in advance. The gray bar represents our Drug Containment Solutions segment, which we refer to as DCS. The blue bar represents the Drug Delivery Systems segment or DDS.
As Christian outlined, the first half of 2026 was resilient and developed alongside our plans. Let me start with the second quarter before turning to the half year picture. In Q2 2026, group revenues amounted to EUR 247.9 million. which represents a flat development at constant currencies and a decline of 1.5% on a reported basis. Keep in mind, that Q2 was the strongest quarter in the financial year 2025.
The actual quarter was shaped by 2 opposing dynamics: continued strong momentum in the DCS segment on the one hand and temporary unfavorable effects in DDS on the other. In DCS, revenues grew to EUR 149.2 million in Q2 and an increase of 7.3% at constant currencies and 4.5% reported. Growth was again boosted by sterile solutions and specialty valves consistent with the trend we saw in Q1. In DDS, revenues were at EUR 98.8 million in Q2, down 9.8% in constant currencies and 9.5% on a reported basis.
This reflects 2 factors: continued weakness in polymer syringes and the lower glass syringe volume as anticipated. Coming to the first half year period. H1 group revenues amounted to EUR 488.1 million, representing an increase of 2.3% at constant currencies, and 1% as reported. DCS was the driver of our revenue development. Revenues increased to EUR 286.4 million, representing an 8.3% growth at constant currencies or 5.7% on a reported basis. As described before, this dynamic increase was mainly due to strong demand for our High Value Solutions. The DDS segment recorded revenues of EUR 201.8 million, down 5.4% at constant currencies or 4.9% as reported. As outlined, the decline mainly occurred in Q2, we expect DDS momentum to improve in the second half for both glass and polymer syringes.
Let's take a closer look at our profitability, again, starting with Q2 before turning to the half year. In Q2 2026, group EBITDA amounted to EUR 64.6 million, a decline of around EUR 7 million year-over-year. This resulted in an EBITDA margin of 26% compared to 28.5% in Q 2025. Just like in revenues, we have opposing dynamics in the segments. DCS EBITDA increased to EUR 38.4 million in Q2, up 15.7% year-over-year with the margin improving more than 2 percentage points to 25.7%. This strong growth was driven by volume and a favorable product mix towards High Value Solutions.
In DDS, EBITDA was at EUR 26.9 million in Q2, down 28% year-over-year with the margin decreasing to 27.2%. The reason for this development were a one-off inventory impairment on a customer-specific glass syringe, which was in the high single-digit million euro range. In addition, we had lower utilization in polymer syringes. Adjusted for the one-off effect, the DDS margin would have been on par with prior year.
Turning to the first half year. Group EBITDA amounted to EUR 129.8 million, broadly on last year's level. resulting in an EBITDA margin of 26.6%. In DCS, EBITDA increased 17.2% year-over-year to EUR 71.8 million. with the margin improving significantly to 25.1%. Growth was driven by volume improvements and favorable product mix effects. Particularly High Value Solutions were again the main driver of margin expansion. In DDS, EBITDA came in at EUR 59.5 million. resulting in a margin of 29.5%. As outlined, this decline mainly occurred in the second quarter, resulting from a one-off effect. There are no structural changes in DDS profitability, and we expect the margin profile to improve in the second half year.
Turning to the rest of the P&L. EBIT amounted to EUR 86.5 million, 6.9% below the prior year, mainly due to the one-off inventory impairment as well as higher depreciation following our growth investments. The depreciation and amortization increased by 15% to EUR 43 million. The financial result improved by EUR 2.4 million to minus EUR 4.1 million, mainly due to lower interest expenses resulting from the optimization of our financing structure. Income taxes amounted to EUR 17.9 million compared to EUR 18.3 million in the prior year period. The tax rate of 21.8% is marginally higher than last year and in line with our expectations. Overall, net income amounted to EUR 64.4 million compared to EUR 68.1 million last year. This corresponds to earnings per share of EUR 0.43.
Now let's turn to our cash flow and investments. In the first half of 2026, cash flow from operating activities amounted to EUR 95.1 million, compared with EUR 72.6 million in the prior year period. This development was primarily driven by working capital improvements, in particular, a reduction in receivables. This offsets higher inventories to support higher customer demand anticipated for the second half of 2026. Cash flow from ongoing investing activities was on last year's level at around EUR 50 million. This reflects our continued strategic investments in capacity expansion, especially for High Value Solutions in Switzerland and Hungary. Free cash flow more than doubled year-over-year to EUR 45.4 million.
Based on our first half year performance,and our current visibility from a strong order book, we confirm our guidance for the full financial year 2026. We continue to expect revenue growth of 2% to 5% at constant currencies and an EBITDA margin of around 27% for the full year. In addition to our guidance, I would like to mention 2 further key metrics for the financial year 2026. Expect our planned capital expenditure to range between EUR 140 million and EUR 160 million. We are confident in achieving an HVS revenue share at prior year's level, which was a robust 57% and we assume a tax rate consistent with the previous year at around 22%.
This concludes our financial update. I will now hand it back to Tobias. Before we start with the Q&A session.
Thank you very much, Christian and Reinhard. We will now open the Q&A session, Viara, our operator, will assist with registration.
[Operator Instructions]
Okay. The first question comes from Giang Nguyen at Citi.
2. Question Answer
Christian, nice to virtually meet you. I'm curious to see what are your impressions of the company since joining at the beginning of this month? And what do you see as the key levers to value creation for the company? More specifically, we have seen quite a fair bit of contractual changes in the last sort of 1, 2 years as it relates to both polymer and more recently glass syringes. What's your initial view on the outlook for the business?
And I have a second question for Reinhard, but I will ask after this one.
Thank you very much for your question. And yes, nice to meet you virtually as well. Well, when it comes to my impression after the first -- yes, I have to say a couple of days, I would, first of all, say there is nothing too spectacular. I feel that SCHOTT Pharma is a highly innovative company being well prepared to meet the demands of the pharma industry in the future.
And when it comes to the structural contractual changes that you have seen at this point, I would say the changes you are referring to are specific for the one customer. I think you have in mind there. It's a situation that -- where we are in a positive and cooperative discussion, and I fully believe that we will have this under control on short notice.
The initial view on the business itself is that, as we have said earlier, I do confirm the guidance for the current fiscal year. And what comes with that is the expectation of a stronger second half of the year.
And second question for Reinhard. I think in DDS specifically, excluding the inventory impairment, profitability appeared quite solid despite the underutilization related to polymer syringes. So could you talk to the driver of margins for DDS for in the quarter and expectations for the remainder of the year?
And follow-up is, can you confirm that the glass syringe impairment was truly a one-off topic, and there's no risk in the coming quarters?
Thank you, Giang, for your questions. Maybe I'll start with the last part of your question first.
Yes, it is a contained impact in Q2, taking from impairments as there's not yet, let's say, clarification with this one single customer. Other than that, we really have seen a good financial performance in DDS which is, as I said, on prior year's level. And as I said as well, we see growth momentum in both glass and polymers syringes for the second half of the year, which shall support, let's say, a strong operating profit in this segment.
The next question comes from Falko Friedrichs at Deutsche Bank.
My first question is on the top line phasing of growth between the third and the fourth quarter. So how much of an acceleration could we already see in the third quarter? Or is this really mostly expected to happen in the fourth quarter?
Then secondly, do you believe that the full range -- guidance range on sales growth is still in play? Or should we rather look at the lower half of it, considering where your first half growth landed? And then lastly, could you give a little bit more color on where you stand with this one large syringe customer? Is there potentially further downside risk in terms of how much that customer orders for you? Do you have any early indication how business from that customer might shape up into 2027? That would be very helpful.
Falko, thank you for your questions. I think I will take the first 2 parts and then Christian will chip in on the customer perspective part again.
Towards your question, Q3 and Q4, obviously, we are not guiding by the quarter as such. So we have a second half, which will be stronger. And then when you look to the comps last year, third quarter was certainly at a lower growth rate than the fourth quarter. But that means we will expect to see already growth showing up in the third quarter, but I'm not giving you a specific guidance. So both quarters will deliver growth to our expectation today.
To the second point, that goes right into the guidance. We have the full guidance range still there. Hence, we are not at the lower end. So as we have seen the growth, especially in the first half, impacted by glass syringe business and planned on the polymer, but strong in the DCS, the momentum change we are seeing also through the order book towards the second half year is a good confidence base we have.
And then with the onetime impact, you can see that the underlying operating profit in the second quarter is also strong. So that gives us confidence that the given guidance will hold and has, so to say, the right range. also for the profitability perspective. Now maybe, Christian?
Yes. Thank you, Reinhard. And regarding your third question, with that specific glass syringe customer. As said before, we are in very constructive negotiations with that customer. We, as a matter of fact, do not see a significant downside risk. On the contrary, I see more chances than risks in the future, especially when it comes to 2027.
The next question comes from Olivier Calvet at UBS. Olivier, over to you.
Christian, Reinhard. I just wanted to firstly put the sort of reiteration of the full year guidance in perspective. is your expectation in DDS overall still that sort of both glass and polymer are flat on a full year basis? I guess that's question one.
Can you talk a little bit about the development of the order book or what gives you confidence that you're going to grow in the second half?
And thirdly, if you could come back to this one-off inventory impairment. Is this a specific type of syringe? Any kind of color you could give us there also in terms of when you decided an impairment was needed. Just would be helpful.
Thank you, Olivier. Well, as we have said, we expect the DDS segment to be flat over the full year. And obviously, we have seen the downside. And obviously, we expect an upside in the second half. And being flat means obviously flattish. It could be slightly negative, slightly positive. And that's, so to say, obviously, in still the making.
On the other side, the order book, and that's really the point is a positive, let's say, driver. We have clearly better book-to-bill ratio this year. Hence, the visibility in DCS as well as DDS gives us this confidence that the aforementioned growth aspiration for the second half is there, but also the growth to come in DDS in '27 is supported. So the growth is expected to continue in glass syringe, but as well for polymer for the years '27, '28 onwards.
On the glass syringe impairment, yes, it was an impairment for customer-specific glass syringes, which we took in Q2 for the aforementioned reasons. No specific further risk we assume at this moment in time for any other glass syringe or other product impairments. This is a pure one-off, and I think Christian gave a little bit of a flavor that we have not yet a conclusion. Hence, this is the reason.
Okay. And just maybe one follow-up on the order intake. Essentially there, your visibility or order book, the visibility you have, could you quantify it maybe in months or sort of until when you have visibility?
Maybe do not specifically give the order book value as such, but it's several months ahead and would even go into '27.
And that's the same across the -- sorry. And that's the same across both segments or...
That's across both segments.
The next question comes from Charles Weston at RBC, Royal Bank of Canada.
My first is on looking at the revenue growth from a different lens in terms of the regions. The EMEA grew 14%, but APAC and North America were both down mid-teens. So I was just wondering if you could help us understand which of the drivers from a DCS DDS perspective were the key drivers on a regional basis. And you also mentioned that one customer is now over 10% of revenue that wasn't at that level in the prior year. So if you could perhaps give us any color around what that might be? Is it GLP, for example? That would be helpful.
My second question -- that was kind of 2. Maybe it's my third question would be on polymer. So I think I just wanted to clarify, you are expecting growth in the second half in polymer. And I think you've just said, Reinhard, that you are expecting that to grow in 2027 and '28. So we should be thinking that we're at the bottom if I'm not mistaken.
And just one last question on modeling, if I can, please. Could you give us some guidance on the D&A charge for this year and perhaps next year given the plant openings?
Thank you, Charles. A lot of questions, but good questions. Obviously, I mean, when we look at the growth in the regions, obviously, sticks out EMEA with 16.6% growth, and that is clearly driven by the strong momentum in DCS, especially on the High Value Solutions offerings we have there. Whilst obviously the negative impact on North America has to do with the aforementioned glass syringe impact. The other regions are, in a way, following what I would call a regional tender-driven business impact.
So that is not to be seen as a critical point. The Americas is more towards the impact we have been talking now for 2 quarters about a specific glass syringe customer. Then you had addressed, what do we see as a 10% customer? Yes, there is now since first half year one client surpassing 10% of revenue shares. And this client is largely active in the GLP-1 sector. And obviously, it's one of our growth drivers, which we see in the glass syringe and in DDS to continue.
Polymer, to your third question, yes, I think we have been talking about polymer development. We see 2026 as the plateauing year. having, so to say, eaten through the massive decline on mRNA, having other applications, 5 other applications capturing that. So that we foresee to be largely over in 2026. And then, let's say, the positive momentum in the other applications, then mRNA taking over and bringing polymer back to a growth. Not giving you a guidance for what growth, but obviously bringing back to growth at, let's say, a good level. So our expectation is, yes, that we see polymer to develop well in '27, '28, '29 onwards. More to hear on this one towards Q4 reporting.
D&A charges, obviously, I mean, the D&A charge will, let's say, continue to increase, given the additional amortizations or, let's say, depreciations for capacities we bring online. And that's following, so to say, our increased CapEx levels in '25 and '26. And that's a trend which will continue in a way. But obviously, the point is there is a certain time frame where we see a tapering off of investments to come. But that's more towards '28, '29, 2030.
Just to clarify on D&A, is there any chance you could put a euro number on it or a percentage of sales or something like that for this and next year?
I will not put a euro number to it. But I think if you take the numbers that we have seen now so far in Q1, Q2 and take, so to say an algorithm to it, you can see what will be the next half year. And then obviously, we are not guiding beyond that.
The next question comes from Christian Ehmann at Berenberg. Christian, the floor is yours.
A lot of my questions have been answered so far. You singled out RTU vials. Could you give us more color on the prospects you see over there and what kind of growth we could expect over the next years coming from that one?
Christian, thank you for your question. Well, when it comes to RTU vials, I think we do address several needs of the pharma industry. whether that is leaner processes and better solutions and more cost-effective solution for the fill and finish process. So the intention is to more and more convert our typical bulk products into RTU vials. And we see this over the upcoming years as a very significant growth driver overall.
Next question comes from [ Sven Kuerten ] at DZ Bank.
I have 2. First one is on GLP-1. Did you receive any feedback from the customers regarding the oral weight loss medication, specifically whether or how they are already affecting sales injectable weight loss medications? And the second one goes to Christian. Could you please outline the top 3 strategic priorities for SCHOTT Pharma? And are there any potential shift in strategy we might anticipate under your leadership?
Yes, Sven, I will take your first question first, when it comes to feedback regarding how oral is affecting the injectable demand for GLP-1, when it comes to our conversations with customers and our view on that market, we do see those basically 2 applications to develop alongside not having a significant impact. So the market growth is expected to be that strong, that there are basically 2 separate segments developing very positively moving forward.
And we, of course, want to participate in the injectable development. When it comes to the strategy of SCHOTT Pharma I can share with you that through the last couple of weeks, I've had the opportunity to look into the strategy of the group already. And overall, I feel pretty comfortable with it. I think, especially the priorities of further growing by innovation will stay one of the top priorities for the upcoming years as well as the look at cost efficiency and operational excellence.
Those are 2 main pillars and that will remain 2 main pillars for our strategy moving forward. Whether, let me say, further adjustments or refining and improving will be necessary from my perspective right now, after 2 weeks with SCHOTT Pharma, a little early to say, but I will certainly look further into that and make adjustments along the way if needed.
Next question comes from Edward Hall at Stifel.
Just a couple, I think the majority have been asked, I just -- I've heard some recent reports of destocking glass syringes at least maybe very near term with excess inventory held by pharma. Could you confirm or deny this statement? That's my first question.
Thanks for the question. We do not see a destocking effect on glass syringes. Obviously, and disclose more to the broader base. We see a strong demand from, first of all, the GLP-1 trends, but also the standard demand in vaccinations, apart from the one topic we discussed now many times on one specific account. But no destocking effect we see on our side.
That's super clear. And then just -- I think you touched on it recently just on the mRNA polymer growth. I'm thinking to the other applications. I was wondering if you could talk through the growth you've seen in the other applications at least you've seen for this year initially and then sort of an outlook, maybe a guidance range there. If you could be more specific, that would be really helpful.
Yes, thank you for that question. Obviously, we are still in downward trend on the mRNA side, but this one is slowing down. We talked now in the last year that we were in the high single digit percent to revenue for mRNA-based products. Today, we are at mid-single digit. And obviously, this trend may further bring the value down, but has substantially slowed down.
And then the other applications, and that's 5 major applications for us, amongst them, aesthetics, animal health, long-acting injectables IV or mental health, those have high single-digit growth we have seen. And obviously, it's on a broader base than with the mRNA. And that gives us confidence that the plateauing effect in 2026 is, so to say, a solid one. And then going forward, we will see growth in polymer again.
Perfect. That's great. And then my final question is just on the GLP-1 growth you're seeing, and I'm thinking of it from a geographical perspective. Obviously, U.S. is a strong market, but we're seeing growth now in emerging markets and other regions. So I was curious if you could provide some insight into where you're seeing the growth from that particular indication.
I think one area of growth obviously comes in the, let's say, the originator growth. This is where we see the strongest growth. Obviously, with some patent cliffs to come, the growth will more to be towards 2030, 2031. But obviously, we have discussions there as well. But our current focus is to participate in the growth of the GLP-1 originators, strong.
We have seen let's say, a double-digit growth in our sector. Last year, we were at, let's say, higher single-digit numbers. This year, first half, we are clearly a double-digit revenue number. And that shall show you that there are strong growth underneath in the GLP-1 application.
The next question, or let's say it this way, it's likely the final question comes from Christopher Richardson at Jefferies. Chris, thank you very much for your patience. Please go ahead.
In the annual report, you cite the IQVIA assessment that the primary packaging market grew 1% to 2% in 2025 and 3% is expected in 2026.
I was just wondering how this relates to your initial expectations prior to those figures for the respective years? And how do you expect to grow relative to this? And then just as a second one, on the operating cash improvement, receivables inflow improved I just wanted to confirm whether any factoring was involved in that. And on the liability side, there was an outflow of cash. Just wondering if there are any changes to payment term policies or anything we should be aware of on the liability side?
Christopher, thanks for your question. Obviously, we as addressed in the annual report, see this, let's say, low single-digit growth in our business segment, and that's what we expect for mainly our bulk products, whether it's bulk valves or bulk cartridges or bulk ampoules. And still, obviously, we have a very strong market-leading position in these segments and obviously participate with this underlying growth. And I hope this answer now, so to say your questions in a way, we are not specifying now how much share of our growth in '27 to '29 stems from that because it's a composition. But obviously, we participate and expect growth as well in our bulk products. And we do see growth in the bulk products already today, that one part of DCS growth numbers for the first half year.
The second point, regarding your receivable question, we are not doing factoring. So it's a true improvement versus prior year ending level. As working capital is, for me, let's say, a discipline within the finance area. We need to, let's say, contribute with cash also from a working capital side. And this is something we continue to work on.
Thanks, Chris. It seems there are no additional questions, which brings us to the end of our today's conference call. Thank you very much, Christian, thank you very much, Reinhard, and thanks to everybody, every participant in the call today. We look forward to seeing you at the upcoming conferences in New York, Frankfurt and London, and our 9 months results will be published in August 12. That's it for today. Thank you very much. Have a good day. Bye-bye.
SCHOTT Pharma — Q2 2026 Earnings Call
SCHOTT Pharma — Q2 2026 Earnings Call
Resilient H1: revenues modestly up, margins steady, DCS driving growth while DDS faces a temporary headwind and a one-off impairment.
📊 Quarter at a Glance
- Revenue: EUR 488.1m (+2.3% at constant currencies for H1 FY2026)
- EBITDA: EUR 129.8m (margin 26.6%); EBITDA = earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
- Segments: Drug Containment Solutions (DCS) EUR 286.4m +8.3% CC; Drug Delivery Systems (DDS) EUR 201.8m -5.4% CC
- Net income/EPS: Net income EUR 64.4m; EPS EUR 0.43
- HVS mix: High Value Solutions (HVS) 56% of revenues, supporting margin resilience
🎯 What Management Says
- Strategy: Three pillars—innovation, capacity expansion and long-term partnerships—focused on growing High Value Solutions for complex biologics and home-use formats
- Product launch: cartriQ BioPure, a sterile glass cartridge for sensitive biologics and self-injection, targeted to market by end‑2026
- Capacity: Continued investment in Switzerland and Hungary to expand RTU (ready-to-use) cartridges and glass syringe production
🔭 Outlook & Guidance
- FY guidance: Revenue growth 2–5% at constant currencies; EBITDA margin around 27% (guidance reaffirmed)
- CapEx & taxes: Planned capital expenditure EUR 140–160m; tax rate ~22%
- HVS & DDS: Expect HVS share near prior year (~57%); DDS momentum to improve in H2 despite a Q2 one-off inventory impairment in the high single‑digit million euro range
❓ Analyst Q&A
- Key customer: A single customer-specific glass syringe contract caused the Q2 impairment; management says negotiations are constructive and sees limited downside, even upside into 2027
- Polymer syringes: Underutilization pressured DDS in Q2 but management expects polymer volumes to plateau in 2026 and return to growth in 2027–2028
- Order book: Book-to-bill improved; visibility extends several months into 2027 across both segments, underpinning H2 confidence
⚡ Bottom Line
- Conclusion: SCHOTT Pharma delivered a resilient H1 driven by higher-margin DCS/High Value Solutions, offsetting a temporary DDS weakness and a one-off inventory charge; management reaffirmed full‑year targets and continues to invest in higher‑value capacity, leaving shareholders with steady margins and potential upside as DDS recovers and new products ramp.
SCHOTT Pharma — Q1 2026 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the SCHOTT Pharma Q1 2026 Conference Call. [Operator Instructions]
Let me now turn the floor over to your host, Tobias Erfurth.
Thank you, Anna. Good morning, everyone, and welcome to SCHOTT Pharma's earnings call for the first quarter financial year 2026. My name is Tobias Erfurth, Head of Investor Relations, and I will be guiding you through today's call and webcast.
I'm joined by our CEO, Andreas Reisse; and our CFO, Reinhard Mayer. Andreas will start by sharing strategic and business updates, followed by Reinhard, who will present our financial performance in detail. Afterwards, we open the floor for your questions.
Please take a moment to review our disclaimer. And as a quick note, our financial year 2026 has started on October 1, 2025, so the Q1 results we are presenting today cover the period from October 1 to December 31, 2025.
With that, I will hand over to our CEO, Andreas Reisse.
Thanks, Tobias. A warm welcome to everyone joining us for today's call. So I'm pleased to present an overview of our strategy and recent business developments.
So we had a good start to the financial year 2026. The first quarter performed better than expected in terms of both revenue and earnings. So revenue for Q1 2026 increased by 4.8% at constant currencies to EUR 240 million. The stronger demand was broad-based across our portfolio with continued high demand for our high-margin, high-value solutions, short HVS.
Our EBITDA grew significantly by 11% to EUR 65 million, resulting in a strong margin of 27.1%. This profitability improvement was mainly driven by our HVS, especially in Drug Containment Solutions.
Overall, demand for HVS remains strong, enabling us to reach a revenue share of 57%, and that marks an increase of 2 percentage points compared to last year, and it is consistent with the high level we achieved in financial year 2025.
So the key factor behind the success of our high-value solutions is our growth strategy, which is built on innovation, expansion and trustful partnerships. So we are seeing a continuous increase in the share of HVS.
And within our total revenues, reaching 57% in the first quarter, 2 percentage points higher than last year, we are well on track to reach our midterm goal of exceeding 60%. So HVS products are essential for further profitable growth. They are developed to address evolving industry trends and regulatory needs, allowing us to achieve higher prices and stronger margins.
So now let me highlight some of the recent innovations, partnerships, and expansion projects. We have just launched EVERIC lyo and amber vials, an innovative solution for the safe storage of light-sensitive antibody drug conjugates or ADCs that need lyophilization. Amber vials are essential for today's light-sensitive biologics and some ADCs because they provide reliable protection against light-induced degradation, something clear glass simply cannot deliver. So ADCs, for example, belong to the most complex and most expensive medicines on the market, which makes protection from the first -- very first fill-and-finish step critical.
Also, we just prevalidated our new TOPPAC polymer cartridge in 3-milliliter and 5-milliliter with SHL's Maggie large-volume autoinjectors. With our new polymer cartridge, we are again setting an industry benchmark.
It is the first ISO-compliant sterile polymer cartridge on the market. And this unlocks new possibilities for pharma companies working with sensitive biologics. So with highest dimensional precision, optimized geometry and ready to use, it ensures maximum device compatibility while reducing process risk.
This lays the foundation for the next generation of large-volume subcutaneous therapies, a genuine innovation step that brings together efficiency, safety, and future readiness.
Subcutaneous delivery via autoinjectors is transformative because it allows patients to self-administer treatments at home, instead of spending hours in clinics.
We also expand our capacities for HVS with a particular focus on large volume solutions, glass syringes and ready-to-use cartridges at our sites in Switzerland and Hungary.
With that, I'll hand over to Reinhard, who will provide you with an update on our financials for the first quarter.
Thank you, Andreas, and good morning, everyone. I'm pleased to walk you through our financials for the first quarter of financial year 2026 in more detail.
As Andreas outlined, we had a positive start to the financial year. We generated revenues of EUR 240.2 million, representing growth of 3.8% year-over-year or 4.8% at constant currencies. Our Drug Containment Solutions segment represented by the gray bar was the main driver of the positive overall revenue development, achieving elevated growth of 9.4% at constant currencies, reaching EUR 137.2 million. This was propelled by continued strong demand for HVS products, especially for sterile cartridges and specialty valves.
Drug Delivery Systems represented by the blue bar, remained at the level of the prior year quarter at EUR 103.1 million. At constant currencies, the development was slightly negative at minus 0.8%.
While we saw strong demand for prefillable glass syringes, particularly for GLP-1 applications, the reduced use of mRNA vaccines continued to have a negative effect on polymer syringes.
Now let's take a closer look at our bottom line performance. The group EBITDA grew 11.1% to EUR 65.2 million, with margin expanding from 25.4% to 27.1%.
Looking at the segments, DCS delivered remarkable EBITDA growth of 18.9%, to EUR 33.4 million, with margins improving significantly from 21.9% to 24.3%. This was driven by volume and product mix effects.
In DDS, EBITDA declined by 7.3%, to EUR 32.6 million, in line with our expectations. The margin decreased from 34.1% in Q1 2025 to 31.6% in Q1 2026, primarily due to product mix effects, lower production utilization for polymer syringes, and ramp-up costs for our new glass syringe capacities in Hungary. Despite this decline, the DDS segment continues to deliver strong profitability.
EBIT grew by 9% to EUR 43.8 million, up from last year's EUR 40.2 million, driven by volume growth, contributions by equity participations, and positive foreign exchange effects.
The financial result improved by EUR 1.6 million compared with Q1 2025, to minus EUR 1.8 million. This was mainly driven by lower interest expenses from cash-pool financing as a result of an intragroup refinancing carried out in the first quarter of 2026.
Income taxes increased to EUR 8.8 million, which results in an effective tax rate of 20.8%, up from 19.1% in the prior year. The rise in the tax rate is mainly driven by a change in country mix.
Overall, net income reached EUR 33.3 million, up EUR 3.5 million from last year. This represents an increase of 12% year-on-year. Earnings per share amounted to EUR 0.22.
And now let me take you through our cash flow and investments on the next slide. In the first quarter of 2026, our cash flow from operating activities came in at EUR 3.4 million, significantly below prior year. This change was primarily driven by working capital, largely due to a deferred payment by a major customer at the end of the quarter. Adjusting for this effect, operating cash flow would have remained at the prior year level. The deferred payment was realized in January.
Cash flow from investing activities reflected our continued strategic investments in capacity expansion, particularly for high-value solutions in Switzerland and Hungary. Capital expenditure was EUR 23.4 million, slightly above the prior year level. Our free cash flow amounted to minus EUR 20 million in the first quarter, mainly impacted by the deferred payment, as already mentioned.
Despite ongoing uncertainties, we remain optimistic about the current financial year for 2026 and continue to expect revenue growth of 2% to 5% at constant currencies. We are also confirming our EBITDA margin guidance of around 27%.
In addition to our guidance, I would like to mention 2 further key metrics for the financial year 2026. We expect our planned capital expenditure to range between EUR 140 million to EUR 160 million. We are confident in achieving an HVS revenue share at the robust 57% level, and we assume a tax rate as in the previous year, which was around 22%.
This concludes now our financial update. I will now hand it back to Tobias before we start with the Q&A session.
Thank you very much, Andreas. Thank you very much, Reinhard. We are now open to the Q&A session. Anna, our operator, will assist with the registration. Anna, please go ahead.
[Operator Instructions]
Thank you, Anna. The first question comes from Giang Nguyen from Citibank.
2. Question Answer
I have 2, please, and I'll just ask one at a time. So the first question is, you called out Q1 is better than expected, both on revenues and earnings. Can you talk to the level of confidence in the full year outlook now following the very positive start to the year? And how do you expect revenues and margins to trend in the remaining 3 quarters, considering that the comps organic growth kicked in, in Q2, but will ease again in the second half? And then I'll ask my second question after.
Okay. As you said, as we have, of course, we have confirmed our guidance. So because the volatility in the market is still high and, therefore, I would say we keep it as is. It's a good start, definitely, but now let's see how the rest of the year will develop.
And as Reinhard has already mentioned during his speech, we are confident to achieve our guidance.
Let me just add. I mean, as we are not guiding quarter-by-quarter, we will not issue, let's say, specific, let's say, guidances around that. And that is, so to say, the conclusion on your question.
And then my second question is more specifically on the DCS. Very strong performance in the HVS segment again. Can you talk about your expectations for the rest of the year and whether you can say that this portion of DCS is getting maybe less lumpy or you're having better visibility on it, considering that it's now grown to nearly 25% of your DCS rather than in the teens like a couple of years ago?
My expectation is that in DCS, HVS remains strong because it's really following our strategy, which we have defined, of course, years back, and now we have to pay back because the market is having that demand for these products, mainly sterile solutions, which is sterile vials and cartridges, but as well as special vials, for example, for the ADCs which I mentioned already in my speech. So we expect a higher value share -- a higher share of high-value solutions in DCS for the rest of the year, definitely.
Okay. The next question comes from Olivier Calvet from UBS.
I have one question for you, Andreas, and one for Reinhard. Maybe, Andreas, have there been any changes to demand in core DCS? I think it was up probably low single-digit organically in the quarter. And also curious if the growth in the quarter in HVS DCS was more in cartridges or vials?
And then maybe for you, Reinhard. So glass syringes, we -- I think we were pretty positively surprised given your comments in December and the performance in the quarter. But just given the news flow from peers today and the deferred payment in your cash from operations, could you maybe comment on, A, maybe bill-and-hold revenue? How much does that account in your sales and the controls in place that -- to avoid the kind of issues we've seen elsewhere with revenue recognition?
In DCS, the core segment, we have -- of course, we don't disclose precise numbers. But as always, we are expecting something like that, we are growing with the market either in the low single-digit amount and that is -- yes, as you know, it's our base business, if you want to say so. So it's okay. And then it differs a lot from region to region. But it is always the same. That is something which we had also in the past years. This year, EMEA is strong and North America is weaker, but that is more or less in line with expectation. And the main growth driver is definitely the HVS solutions. Yes.
Okay. And within HVS, can you break out maybe if the growth was more cartridges or vials?
Cartridges, you can imagine is, of course, one of the growth drivers at the moment due to GLP-1. There's high demand. And that is, of course, pushing the growth. But on the other side, it's also the smallest product group within DCS. But of course, it's growing faster. That's true.
And Olivier, to your point, can you repeat the question regarding glass syringes? I didn't fully capture that. So what was that?
I mean, it's more -- yes, it's more just on accounting. If you could give us a sense of the share of your revenue that might be bill-and-hold. And given the deferred payment in your cash flow, right, I just wanted to get a bit of comfort on the controls you have in place to avoid early revenue recognition if you see what I mean.
Okay. I understand the question. Obviously, let me start first to say we do not have bill-and-hold arrangements at all. That is the first part.
The second part, we obviously have, according to IFRS 15, 35, some contractual assets, and we have intensively reviewed those processes back in 2025. And we have verified that together with the auditors. So I would -- I'm feeling very confident that we have a strong setup here.
The next question comes from Odysseas Manesiotis from BNP Paribas.
I understand you don't guide by quarter, but in Q4, you made it quite clear that Q1 would be the worst quarter of the year, and we're already at the top end of your growth guide. Could you please explain why we could see a deceleration for growth from here, or at least what your guidance implies, or whether there was a particular area of weakness you were expecting in Q1, which has been postponed to another quarter?
Well, thank you, Odysseas. Well, true, we had expectation at the Q4 level that Q1 will be somewhat the weakest and most likely, it is in revenue level, absolute numbers, the weakest. And that's one thing.
The other thing is, as we have highlighted, we have seen a broad-based growth in most of the segments apart from the polymer side, and that was truly better than expected, carried by GLP-1, but also carried by vaccination. And that is a driver.
The other side is the larger impact from the -- in Q4, mentioned glass syringe client will be seen more in Q2, Q3 and Q1 as it was not really visible yet in the Q1 side, and we are still in negotiations. But at the time, this was a risk, which we had reflected.
The next question comes from Charles Weston, RBC, Royal Bank of Canada.
Just to clarify something you just said. You've mentioned GLP as a driver -- a key driver, but you also mentioned vaccinations in your last comment. Has that sort of not declined as much as expected, or is still growing?
And then I wanted to ask, just in terms of the Q1 performance, as you said in Q4, you expected Q1 to be weaker. But clearly, you were guiding this relatively late in the quarter, so can you just explain, were there some very quick turn orders that sort of came in, in I don't know, December that had to be actually delivered by the end of December? It seems like a very quick improvement versus what you were expecting. I have one follow-up as well. Maybe I'll stop there for a second.
Thank you, Charles, for the questions. On the first one, well, GLP-1 continues to be a growth driver for us, and even very much visible in the Q1. Vaccination was also a growth driver, clearly visible in the glass syringe business. While so to say, the mRNA side and polymer sees the expected decline, which we also had highlighted. So that is one topic.
But the second topic, why was now at a -- let's say, December communication for the Q4 strong turn on the Q1, not visible?. Well, we had actually good orders coming in, which we worked through also with additional shifts between Christmas and New Year. And those were, let's say, supplemental volumes, which we didn't see at that point in time. So it's a better momentum in the market, but not necessarily a momentum which can sustain. That's why we remain with the framing of there's still uncertainty in the market.
Okay. Congratulations on delivering on that. I wanted to ask on the guide as well, please. You guided to 2% to 5%. You guided, therefore, on the range on revenue, but not on margin. Can we assume that, that 27% -- I think you may have clarified this earlier. But can you just confirm that 27% would be at the low end and it would therefore be exceeding 27% potentially at the higher end, depending on, I guess, product mix?
Obviously, Charles, this is a question where you will, let's say, have a political answer. In the end, we have a perspective of that the margin sustains, that's why we confirmed the margin. But we also say when we are at the lower end of the revenue level, we assume to reach a 27% EBITDA margin. A lot of it depends on the share of HVS, which we are continuously working on. And with that, I mean, I will leave my answer towards your question.
I do not see any more people in -- oh, Olivier comes with a second question. Olivier Calvet, UBS.
Yes. Just one follow-up on polymer syringe, particularly in non-mRNA. Do you see any changes to the outlook for that business for you in the quarter, or for the full year to be more precise?
Olivier, I don't think so, because we said when we had this down from mRNA, and as you said it will take us 1, 2 -- no, 2, 3 years to start refilling and to see growth and that is what's happening today with polymer. It's -- from my point of view, it's really okay or positive, but significant changes we will see from my point of view, not this year that will come the years after because we are working on opportunities at the moment to fill the lines. And you heard just one example, which was the polymer cartridge, which we have just introduced to the market. So these things will happen, but they will not happen immediately.
Yes. And just to be more precise on the -- you were saying at the full year that you were expecting -- basically, if I recall correctly, polymer flattish in the year with mRNA down, so the non-mRNA business offsetting that. So that was the question I was asking is sort of the non-mRNA part, you still expect it up or to offset the losses in mRNA in '26, right?
Yes, that's what we said. Polymer this year will be flattish at constant currency. So that is something which is happening. Of course, we are a little bit more positive now also with the latest news about flu vaccinations and also combined flu COVID, yes. So -- but I cannot comment on that because it is not clear -- completely clear and transparent to us what that means. So we have to wait for that. And then as I said, we are working on other applications to increase polymer sales in the future. So too early.
Actually...
Yes.
Actually, maybe on that specifically, sorry, there was news flow on that recently. Can you just also make clear if your guidance of declining mRNA revenue in '26 does not reflect any new products coming to the market? Or you do incorporate something there?
No, that's correct. The declining mRNA doesn't assume, let's say, new vaccination product uplift. But what we say is that there is underlying growth in the other segments, whether it's long-acting injectables, surgery, mental health, aesthetics, animal health, those are the drivers, which will bring the polymers syringe business to, let's say, a flattish business performance for the full year.
Thank you. Was it already then over to me?
No, no, no, we have more online here.
Next question comes from Stephan Wulf, ODDO BHF.
So firstly, on the ramp-up process you are in. So my understanding is that you are currently still in the ramp-up process, Switzerland and Hungary. So could you please share your expectations with us on the incremental from this additional capacity in the current fiscal year? So this would be my first one.
And the second one goes to a statement you did earlier, Andreas, when you mentioned the volatility in the market, which is still pretty high. And for that reason, you are not touching your guidance for the full fiscal year, which I totally understand after only the first quarter.
But where is this volatility coming from? So destocking is over for already quite a while. We know that mRNA is weak, GLP-1 is stronger. So what are the main challenges in the market currently? And as I said, where is the volatility you are mentioning coming from predominantly?
Okay. I'll start with the first part as with the ramp-up processes in Switzerland and Hungary. Switzerland, it's mainly -- today, it's mainly sterile cartridges where the demand is high and definitely demand is exceeding capacity at the moment. So that is very positive. It's really on us what we can realize. Yes.
Hungary is basically 2 things. On the one hand side, we are still having lines in validation, for example, glass syringes. And then, of course, the next big step is sterile cartridges where we have had groundbreaking past financial year. So these 2 things, they have definitely an influence on our sales so far so good, I would say. Yes, the projects are on plan. And then I would hand over the volatility to Reinhard.
Yes. Stephan, thank you for that question. Well, volatility, on one side, obviously sits together with a better-than-expected, let's say, drive within the vaccination side. A part of it sits together that this one account which has addressed syringes to reduce has not seen the effect. We still expect that to come in the coming 3 quarters. So that's one element.
The other element is we had a better overall vaccination glass syringe business from various different accounts across the globe and that has obviously a momentum effect, which might be seasonal. This needs to be confirmed. So we cannot rule out that this maintains.
And then the other element is, we actually see good demand, even slightly better demand in Q1 on GLP-1. Is that sustainable in a competitive environment? We need to see. And those are the 3 main drivers. But obviously, a good start to the year and too early to speak about more.
Next question or another question comes from Giang Nguyen from Citi.
I have one follow-up to Reinhard, please. Earlier, you talked about a large or larger order having come through towards the back end of last year. Could I just confirm whether this is incrementally new order? Or did you mean an order coming in -- coming through faster that would have come later on in this fiscal year?
And then my second follow-up question is, do you have any update for us on the plan for the U.S. manufacturing facility at this stage?
Thank you, Giang. Yes, the large order was incremental, to our expectations. But obviously, to be seen in the overall context. And sometimes -- and that's why we also spoke about that in Q4, things change with large accounts, but it was incremental in this specific one.
Then to your second question, we are still in discussions internally about our capacity plans for the United States. So we cannot, today, give an update there. We expect soon, though, but this is an ongoing discussion. And obviously, as we are capital sensitive and mindful about returns, many considerations need to be taken into account, especially in a volatile market. Thank you.
Another follow-up coming from Charles Weston, Royal Bank of Canada.
Just a couple of modeling follow-ups, if I can. Should we be using the financial results and the tax rate from Q1 as a guide for the full year? And do you expect any sort of changes in working capital movements through the year?
Thank you, Charles. Well, tax rate, I think I have outlined that we assume a full year tax rate on the same level as in the previous year, which is around 22%. We had a more positive start, which was more a country mix effect, so slightly below the 22%. But assume the 20% for your modeling topic.
The topic around financing. Well, yes, assume that we have overall lower financing costs. But can you run rate exactly the financing cost of Q1? I would not say so. But we are constantly working on optimizing our internal financing within the group. So it will be a better, so to say, result than last year, but we are not guiding on how much better.
And what was the third question?
It was on working capital. Any changes we should expect?
Well, in working capital, obviously, we had a peak in Q1 for the aforementioned, and I call it cutoff topic, in the accounts receivable side, which was paid in January, as mentioned. We expect working capital to come down over the course of the year with a slightly positive contribution overall to cash flow. And that means below double digit. So let's say, mid-single digit contribution from working capital to be assumed for cash flow.
Thank you, Charles. I do not see any more people in the queue here. So I think that's it for the moment. Thank you, everyone, for your questions and for the good discussion, of course.
And before we come to the end of this call, I would like to hand over to Andreas.
Seems last word.
As you all know, Christian Mias will take over as the new CEO in May. So while I will be with the company for another couple of weeks, this is definitely my last analyst call before I go into retirement after some 40 years within the SCHOTT groups. So I've been managing the pharma systems business unit, which is now SCHOTT Pharma since 2010, and I have always enjoyed working in and for this business a lot.
So we are operating in a growth market where there's much scope for shaping and building things. We are a world leader in our business. And over the past 5 years, we have grown our sales by an average of around 10% per year and improved our profitability by almost 7 percentage points to 28.4% past year.
However, maybe even more importantly, we are contributing to the health of billions of people around the world. And this has always been a great motivation for me to drive things forward together with the SCHOTT Pharma team.
And I'm also very much convinced that the positive development of our company will continue under the strong leadership of Christian Mias and Reinhard Mayer, and I will definitely stay tuned from the outside. So thanks a lot for your trust and take care.
Thank you, Andreas. Thank you, Reinhard, and many thanks to all the participants for taking part in our today's conference call. We look forward to seeing you at the upcoming conferences. Our half-year results will be published on May 13. Thank you very much, and goodbye. Have a good day.
SCHOTT Pharma — Q1 2026 Earnings Call
SCHOTT Pharma — Q4 2025 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the SCHOTT Pharma Conference regarding the results of the fiscal year 2025. [Operator Instructions] Let me now turn the floor over to Tobias Erfurth, Head of Investor Relations.
Thank you very much, Beatrice. Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Thank you for joining our earnings call for the fiscal year 2025. My name is Tobias Erfurth, and I'm Head of Investor Relations. It's my pleasure to guide you through today's call. With me in the room are our CEO, Andreas Reisse; and our CFO, Reinhard Mayer.
Andreas will kick off by sharing the key business and financial highlights of SCHOTT Pharma in the fiscal year 2025. He will also provide an update on our growth strategy, including our achievements in innovation and expansion this year. Following this, Reinhard will take us through our financials. He will also present our financial guidance for the fiscal year 2026, while Andreas will comment on the new midterm guidance after 2026. As always, the presentation will be followed by a Q&A session.
Before we begin, Slide 2, I would like to remind all participants to take a moment to review our disclaimer. Please note that we walk -- as we talk about the fiscal year 2025, we are referring to the period from October 1 to September 30. This fourth quarter relates to the period from July 1 to September 30.
And with that, over to you, Andreas. Please go ahead.
Thanks, Tobias. Welcome, everyone, and thank you for joining our earnings call for the fourth quarter and the fiscal year. So I'm very pleased with -- is it working with the presentation? I'm not so sure. Yes, is that okay? Okay. So I'm very pleased with our performance in fiscal year 2025. And I would like to begin by highlighting a few of our key achievements. First and foremost, we delivered continued revenue growth and high profitability levels, meeting our full year targets, so to be fair, we specified in August.
Secondly, as many of you know, our HVS growth is a central part of our growth strategy. This year, we generated 57% of our total revenues with our strong margin, high-value solutions, further step towards our midterm ambition. And we also made significant process -- progress in our global expansion by continuously increasing production capacities. We continue to strengthen our ability to serve our customers worldwide and meet the growing demand for our products. And we introduced several newly developed and commercialized products.
Our strong innovation pipeline positions us to capitalize effectively on emerging opportunities and foster sustainable growth in the future. So -- and furthermore, leadership succession has been concluded, providing clarity and confidence for the next phase of growth. So in November, the Supervisory Board of SCHOTT Pharma Management AG has appointed Christian Mias as CEO from 1st May '26 onwards. And I'm glad that Christian will lead our extraordinary company into its next chapter.
As an industrial engineer with doctoral degree, he looks back on more than 20 years of management experience, including over 18 years in various leadership positions within the SCHOTT Group. So I will actively support a seamless transition over the coming months to ensure continuity and stability for the company and the entire team.
And Reinhard, many of you have already met, I'm more than happy that he's on Board now. I'm convinced that Christian and Reinhard will form a strong leadership team, bringing in expertise and fresh perspectives.
So looking at our financials for fiscal year 2025, I am pleased to report that we have delivered on our specified targets. Our revenue growth at constant currencies came in at our guidance of around 6%, demonstrating the strength and resilience of our business model even in a volatile market environment. In terms of profitability, we came in at the upper end of our specified expectation, achieving an EBITDA margin of 28.4%.
So in summary, our financial performance in 2025 shows the effectiveness of our growth strategy and our ability to achieve our targets. So let me now share my thoughts on this year's developments in the market. So we continue to see that the pharmaceutical industry evolves rapidly, shaped by several megatrends that are transforming patient care as well as manufacturing. So I'm confident in saying that we remain ideally positioned to leverage these developments with our specialized portfolio and industry partnerships.
And today, I would like to dive deeper into some of these trends shown on the left-hand side and how we address them, with our extensive product portfolio on the market, shown on the right-hand side of the slide, and I will also explain how we benefit significantly from these trends.
Biologics remain a major growth engine for the sector with new therapies, such as GLP-1, ADCs and mRNA-based treatments, driving demand for advanced packaging solutions. The global uptake of GLP-1 drugs for diabetes, obesity and new indications like dementia and Parkinson's is accelerating, and we continue to benefit from this growth.
In mRNA, research momentum remains strong with expanding applications beyond COVID-19 including flu, combined flu-COVID vaccines and norovirus. ADCs, so-called antibody drug conjugates, are also gaining traction, further approval is expected in the future. So our comprehensive offering of prefillable glass and polymer syringes, ready-to-use vials or ready-to-use cartridges and specialty vials ensures we can support our customers across these innovative therapeutic areas.
Homecare Solutions, another key trend, as the industry shifts toward drug administration models that enhance patient comfort and reduce healthcare costs. This is further supported by the move from intravenous to subcutaneous administration, enabled by technologies like Halozyme.
Our large and small volume prefillable glass and polymer syringes as well as ready-to-use cartridges are specifically designed to address the requirements of home care and high-volume self-administration. So manufacturing processes are undergoing a fundamental transformation with the industry moving decisively toward ready-to-use solutions, supported by regulatory momentum and the growing significance of industry associations such as the Alliance for Ready-to-Use, which we co-founded.
Our extensive ready-to-use portfolio covering vials, cartridges and syringes in both glass and polymer position us as a leading innovator and trusted partner for our customers, as they adapt to new manufacturing standards. Sustainability is an ongoing priority for our customers and the industry at large. We are driving the transition to more sustainable processes through initiatives such as our closed-loop recycling project with other industry players such as Takeda and Corplex and the introduction of optimized nest designs that significantly reduce waste across the supply chain.
So this combination of megatrends, biologics, home care, manufacturing shifts and sustainability, together with our strong market positioning, is fueling our growth and supporting us to deliver value even in a volatile market environment. We remain committed to meeting the evolving needs of our customers and supporting the future of healthcare.
So shifting our revenue towards HVS remains essential to our growth. What we see is that building upon our strategic pillars of innovation, expansion and trustful partnerships continues to pay off. We are steadily advancing our portfolio towards more HVS to serve the increasing market demand. So with the broad offering of HVS, we are ideally positioned to grow faster than the overall market while improving our profitability.
And even in a volatile market environment, the demand for our HVS solutions remains high, underlining the strength of our strategic approach. So despite headwinds of fading mRNA vaccination demand, we were able to further grow our revenues -- revenue share from 55% to 57% last fiscal year, and we are on track to achieve our midterm goal of generating more than 60% of our revenue from HVS.
So let me now turn to how we are delivering on our innovation agenda and advancing solutions that align with major industry megatrends, which I have just described. First, we are improving home care with large volume drug delivery systems. So this year, we introduced the first 5.5 milliliter prefillable staked-needle glass syringe for Ypsomed’s YpsoMate 5.5 autoinjector. And this is a significant step forward as it enables high-dose medications to be administered at home, supporting greater patient autonomy and convenience.
And in addition, our partnership with SHL Medical has allowed us to launch a large volume sterile cartridge for auto-injectors, further supporting the self-administration of high-dose therapies in a home setting. So second, we are driving innovation to protect sensitive biologics. We launched the first ISO-compliant ready-to-use polymer cartridge, expanding the range of design and device options for our customers.
We also introduced the SCHOTT TOPPAC freeze polymer syringe, which enables the storage and delivery of medications at ultra-low temperatures as low as minus 180 degrees Celsius. And this is particularly relevant for cell and gene therapies where product stability is critical.
And finally, we are redefining safety, efficiency and sustainability in healthcare. So in collaboration with Schreiner Medipharm, we developed the next-generation SCHOTT TOPPAC infuse polymer syringe system. And this system was specifically designed to improve safety, efficiency and sustainability and has already been recognized with the CPHI Pharma Award. Additionally, we are seeing further growth of our alliance to ready-to-use, which is enhancing collaboration and production efficiency across the industry.
So in summary, our focus on innovation and partnerships enables us to deliver solutions that address the evolving needs of patients, healthcare providers and the pharma industry. So we are confident that these advancements will continue to drive SCHOTT Pharma's growth and dealership in the years ahead.
So now, let us look at the developments during the last 12 months with regard to our other strategic pillar, namely expansion. So on this map, you can see our global footprint with all SCHOTT Pharma manufacturing sites. So we are present in all major pharma hubs globally. The dark blue points represent our existing locations, while the light blue points indicate where we continue to execute our expansion program in 2025.
So first of all, we have expanded our HVS capacities for new modalities. In Switzerland and Hungary, we are expanding our portfolio of ready-to-use cartridges and glass syringes to support the growing demand for GLP-1 therapies. In Mulheim, we are advancing specialty vials for antibody drug conjugates, and we are also increasing our capacity for large-volume glass syringes in Switzerland. And as a reminder, most of our HVS projects are based on customer contracts and often co-financed by customers.
So secondly, we act on changes from geopolitical and geoeconomic developments. In the U.S., we are currently evaluating further capacity expansion. And in India, we continue to support the growth of our very successful joint venture, SCHOTT Poonawalla. We are also optimizing our local footprint. The relocation of ampule production to Serbia has enabled us to establish the largest ampoule hub in the region, which has been running since April this year. So this new site is a major milestone, enhancing our competitiveness in drug containment solutions and reinforcing local supply chains for our customers across the region.
So in a nutshell, our ongoing investments in capacity and geographic reach positioned SCHOTT Pharma to capture growth opportunities, support our partners and reinforce our leadership in the industry.
With that, I now hand over to Reinhard for a closer look at our financial performance.
Thank you, Andreas. Also, a warm welcome from my side. I will now take you through our fourth quarter and fiscal year in detail. Please turn to Slide 12 for the revenues. Our Drug Delivery Solutions segment, or DDS, continues to focus exclusively on high-value solutions, encompassing both glass and polymer prefillable syringes that serve rapidly expanding therapeutic areas such as biologics. The Drug Containment Solutions segment, or DCS, remains anchored in our core vials, cartridges and ampules, complemented by high-valuable products like ready-to-use and specialty vials and cartridges.
Turning to the top line for the fourth quarter. We delivered another period of robust revenue growth. Q4 revenues reached EUR 247 million, up 4.2% year-on-year and 6.6% at constant currencies. This performance was driven by a strong momentum in the DCS segment, particularly with high-value solutions. DDS revenues totaled EUR 113 million in the fourth quarter. While this is slightly below last year's record revenue level, glass syringe demand remained strong, largely offsetting softness in polymer syringes. While the segment is impacted by lower demand for vaccinations, it continues to benefit from the increasing demand for biologics and self-administration therapies.
The DCS segment achieved quarterly revenues of EUR 134 million, up from EUR 119 million in the prior year. At constant currencies, DCS delivered double-digit growth of 11.9%, propelled by strong demand for high-value solutions, especially in sterile cartridges and specialty vials.
For the full fiscal year, we achieved record revenues of EUR 986 million, representing 3% growth year-on-year and 5.8% growth at constant currencies. High-value solutions contributed 57% of total revenues, which demonstrates that we are successfully delivering on our strategic direction.
I would also like to point out that the foreign exchange effects had a moderate impact on results with overall FX headwinds similar to last year. Main effects stem from Argentinian peso, Hungarian forint and Swiss franc. DDS full year revenues were EUR 439 million on par with prior year despite softness in polymer syringes. DCS reported revenues of EUR 548 million with strong growth in the sterile cartridges and specialty vials. Summarizing, our focus on high-value solutions continues to drive profitable growth, supported by robust development in our core business.
Now, let's take a closer look at our EBITDA development on the next Slide 13. As highlighted earlier by Andreas, we are very pleased to report another year of strong profitability. In Q4, EBITDA reached EUR 67 million, up 2.9% year-on-year at constant currencies with a corresponding margin of 26.9%. This result was driven by the good revenue development and ongoing cost improvements in operations, which more than compensated for increased ramp-up costs in Serbia and Hungary and lower utilization in polymer.
Within the DDS segment, Q4 EBITDA was EUR 38 million. While this is lower than last year's exceptionally strong quarter, the segment's performance was supported by continued strength in glass syringes, which partly offset the impact of ramp-up costs in Hungary and the just mentioned lower utilization in polymer.
The DDS margin reached 33.9%, which compares to 38.1% in the prior year. DCS delivered a significant improvement with Q4 EBITDA rising to EUR 28 million, up from EUR 17 million in the prior year. This strong margin uplift was driven by positive product mix and efficiency improvements in the operations.
Looking at the full year, EBITDA increased to EUR 280 million, representing year-on-year growth of 11.5% at constant currencies. The EBITDA margin came in at 28.4%, up 1.5 percentage points versus prior year. DDS contributed EUR 153 million to the full year EBITDA, while DCS delivered EUR 128 million. DCS showed particularly strong EBITDA growth of 35% at constant currencies, with margin expanding by 4 percentage points to 23.5%, driven by product mix and operational improvements. DDS came in with a margin of 34.6%, which is below last year's 37.9%, but still maintains an industry-leading profitability level. In summary, our strong profit growth in 2025 was underpinned by a continued shift toward high-value solutions and improved operational efficiency.
Please follow me further down on the P&L in the next slide. EBIT grew by 4.3% to EUR 201 million, up from last year's EUR 193 million. Higher interest costs affected the financial results, while on the tax side, we faced increased tax costs due to global minimum taxation or Pillar 2 and country mix effects. As a result, earnings per share amounted to EUR 0.97 after EUR 0.99 in the previous year.
Following the positive operational development and results, we proposed to the Annual General Meeting a dividend of EUR 0.18 per share, which is an increase of EUR 0.02 versus prior year. Payout corresponds to 18% of net income and aligns with our capital allocation policy. This is our third consecutive dividend increase since our IPO.
Now, let me take you through our cash flow and investments on the next slide. In the fiscal year, our cash flow from operating activities remained robust and continued to support our growth strategy. For the fiscal year 2025, cash flow from operating activities was EUR 180 million. While this represents a decrease compared to last year, it is important to note that the reduction was primarily due to higher working capital requirements and timing of increased tax payments, which more than offset the improvement in EBITDA. Despite this development, our operating cash flow was sufficient to fully self-fund our ongoing strategic investments in fiscal year 2025.
Our cash flow from ongoing investing activities for the year amounted to EUR 143 million, broadly in line with the prior year. The majority of the outflows related to CapEx for capacity expansions, particularly in high-value solutions. As a result, free cash flow for the full year was EUR 37 million.
In the fourth quarter, cash flow from operating activities was EUR 52 million with investing cash flow at negative EUR 55 million, resulting in a slightly negative free cash flow of minus EUR 3 million for the quarter. This quarterly pattern reflects the typical year-end investment cycle and timing of major project expenditures. Overall, our cash generation remains strong and underlines the resilience of our business model.
Finally, let's take a look at our guidance for 2026. Profitable and sustainable growth remains at the core of our strategy. We are navigating a complex environment with a clear focus on innovation, expanding our high-value solutions and strengthening industry partnerships. For fiscal year 2026, we expect organic revenue growth of 2% to 5% at constant currencies. This outlook reflects moderate growth in a challenging market environment and also takes into account the revised forecast from a key customer, which leads to lower demand for glass syringes. When looking at the sequence of growth, we expect the first quarter to be the weakest.
Looking at our segments, revenue growth will be driven entirely by the DCS segment, supported by the continued ramp-up of ready-to-use cartridge production and further recovery in core vials. The DDS segment will be flattish to prior year as we are impacted by one key customer in glass syringes and our polymer business to be on par to prior year.
While we foresee a further decline in mRNA vaccination revenues within our polymer syringe business, we expect a broad-based and healthy growth in other fields, including IV, animal health, long-acting injectables, mental health and aesthetics.
On profitability, we target an EBITDA margin of around 27% for fiscal year 2026. The EBITDA margin in 2026 is being affected by product mix effects, temporary underutilization of DDS capacities and ramp-up costs for new factories in Serbia and Hungary.
Beyond our guidance, I also want to comment on additional other financial figures. For the fiscal year 2026, we will continue to invest significantly in growth with planned CapEx in the range of EUR 140 million to EUR 160 million, focused primarily on expanding HVS capacity and supporting our innovation pipeline. We expect HVS sales to remain on last year's level. Tax rate should be similar to last year's level of around 22%.
Finally, we remain committed to ensure that our shareholders participate in the company's success. We continue to target a dividend payout ratio of 10% to 20% of net income.
With this short-term outlook, I conclude our financial update. We view 2026 as a bridge year, while the overall underlying market momentum is still intact, which Andreas will explain now.
Thanks, Reinhard. So let us turn to the midterm outlook. So we update our revenue CAGR target for the period 2027 to 2029, now expecting a growth rate of 6% to 8% from prior above 10%, reflecting a more balanced view of current market dynamics. So the EBITDA margin should now increase towards 30%, which compares to low 30s before. And both is underpinned by our strategy to expand our HVS portfolio. So the fundamental of our market remains strong and fully intact. We continue to see an increasing number of innovative therapies entering development and reaching patients.
This progress is supported by demographic changes, rising levels of welfare and improved access to medication across many regions. So these factors provide a solid foundation for long-term growth. So at the same time, we must recognize recent challenges and market dynamics. We have observed dampened momentum in vaccination programs, including mRNA-based vaccines, which were strong growth drivers in the recent past. In addition to that, geopolitical shifts are influencing global supply chains and creating new uncertainties that require us to remain agile and resilient.
And looking ahead, both short- and long-term drivers, especially for our high-value solutions business are strong. Demand for injectables is rising sharply, particularly in areas such as GLP-1 therapies, and this trend is supported by a strong research and development pipeline that includes biosimilars and antibody drug conjugates. We also see an increase in therapies designed for subcutaneous self-administration enabled by large volume delivery devices that improve convenience and patient adherence.
So on the manufacturing side, the industry is moving steadily towards ready-to-use formats such as ready-to-use vials and cartridges. And these solutions enhance efficiency, reduce complexity and improve patient safety. So this shift underscores the importance of our strategic investments and innovation efforts.
So in summary, while we navigate short-term challenges, the long-term outlook for our industry and for our company remains strong, and we are well positioned to capture growth opportunities and deliver sustainable value.
So with that, I would like to end today's presentation. Thank you all very much for your attention, and we now look forward to your questions. So Tobias, please take over.
Yes. Thank you very much, Andreas and Reinhard. We now welcome all your questions and open the Q&A session. I guess, Beatrice will give you some guidance on that.
[Operator Instructions]
The first question comes from Giang Nguyen from Citibank.
2. Question Answer
Hope you can hear me. Two questions from me, please. So the first one is, can you please provide more color around the expected or the unexpected lower glass syringe demand in fiscal '26? And would you be able to confirm that it is related to GLP-1 auto-injectors or which of the customers? And the follow-up is that key customer going to someone else for glass syringes. And then maybe I have one follow-up, but I'll just leave it there for now.
We cannot disclose customer names because we have signed NDAs with all our customers -- our big customers. And that's something we have to respect. So therefore, we cannot tell you much more about that topic than that -- other than that, yes.
And maybe to add to Andreas' point to your second part of the question, I mean, it is a customer which faces market demand reduction. And we are participating in that market demand reduction. So it's not a shift from a technology or towards another competitor, it's a market demand reduction and it affects us, potentially others, too.
Helpful. And just one clarification for me. So in your 2026 outlook remarks earlier, you said that DDS is slightly flat and polymer syringes also flat. Just wanted to check if that -- if I got that correctly, meaning that glass syringes is flat overall, including this customer decline.
Giang, that's exactly correct. I mean, we have basically highlighted in the Q3 report already that we expect polymer business development to be flattish on par in 2026. That's what we see today as well. But with this one customer declining its demand towards us, we now also see that glass syringes in 2026 is flattish while we see strong prospects in the years '27 to '29. So there is this underlying growth still there. But this one customer effect, this single event takes charge on 2026 outlook.
The next question comes from Odysseas Manesiotis from BNP Paribas.
My first one is on your mRNA exposure. You previously said mRNA sales were around 10% of your sales in the last full year. Is it fair to say that we're now less than 5% as of full year '25? And just to understand, is the Q1 weakness that you expect, Reinhard, to be the relatively weakest quarter? Is that because of that remaining comp there? Is that how we should understand it? And then I have a follow-up.
Odysseas, thank you for the question. I mean, we had mRNA exposure in the path of beyond 10%. We have that to basically get into an 8%-ish for 2025, and we expect that to be 5% points-ish for 2026 onwards. And that's part of our flattening expectation on the -- well, on the mRNA and polymer whilst this reduction in mRNA is compensated by the other drivers, which I highlighted in my speech, whether it's IV, long-acting injectables and the other ones.
So this is a further reduction of mRNA, compensated by other positive developments in further applications. The Q1 weakness is indicated by exactly the reduction of this one customer, and that's why we address this upfront so that there is the expectation exactly around the sequence of growth for 2026 and weakness in the first quarter to be expected.
That's very helpful. And could you also remind us your total vaccine exposure as a percentage of group sales? Is it fair to say that with your guide next year, you're not only assuming weakness from that particular customer on the glass side, but you're also taking in, let's say, some conservative assumptions regarding flu vaccinations and other vaccinations given some guideline changes we've had here?
I would say in total mix picture, on the one hand side, yes, we have the weakness of one customer that's definitely influencing us. In total, we also see a little bit reduced vaccination in total, also globally, of course, influenced also by these discussions from the U.S. and new policies. So there is some reduction in vaccination short term.
In the longer term or mid- to longer term, we see increase in vaccination. Yes. So it's not that overall vaccination is significantly going down. That is not the case. Of course, the U.S. influence there has some influence and there are some specific influence by one customer. But overall, I would say, within the next 2, 3 years, we see that the market is recovering.
And the dip in vaccination, honestly, is not that big. Of course, U.S. is not small, but they are representing 5% of the global population. So there is an influence also having in mind that not all people are having access. Yes. But overall, that is not the only region of the world, but some impact.
And in terms of group sales for vaccination, is 10% a fair estimate excluding mRNA that is?
I did not get it specifically. Can you please repeat?
Yes. I was asking in terms of your group exposure to vaccines, 8% to 10%, essentially, we estimate if I exclude mRNA.
Yes, yes. That is in the low double-digit region. Yes. Is that okay?
Yes. Very clear.
Very good. Next question comes from Fynn Scherzler of Deutsche Bank.
So the first question is on the difficult market environment. So you just said there may be some weakness in vaccine demand. Could you maybe expand on that to what extent do you also maybe see an increase in competition? And then I was wondering, you said 2026 is a bridge year, but then 2027, the environment should improve again. So what precisely should then improve again in 2027? And then, I would have a follow-up for that.
Well, to say, honestly, we don't see that we are going to lose market shares. Honestly, we are really okay, I would say, perhaps even a bit better because we have outperformed in many areas of competition in the last year. So we are doing today or we are trying to do today. So that is not the main driver for it. But I really cannot tell you in detail who's delivering what. This is really something I don't know.
Okay. And then for your expectations for things to get better in 2027, is that then more vaccine demand again? Or which factors do you have in mind?
I'll take that. Obviously, I mean, what we do see is a rising demand on the GLP-1 syringe cartridge area. That is one driver of growth going forward. We see a continuation of the strong demand on specialty vials for different applications, amongst them ADCs. And then, let's say, the ready-to-use vials, the ready-to-use cartridges, that is the main driver. The, let's say, rollout of our expansion project is going to contribute then with growing volume. Those are the main drivers based on underlying contracts with key customers and supported by market momentum.
That's very helpful. And then, I have one additional question on your midterm target. So in terms of the phasing over the 3 years, should we think of the growth and also the margin as sort of a straight line improvement, so meaning can 2027 already be at the midpoint of, for example, the revenue guidance corridor?
And then it would be helpful if you could maybe also speak about the contribution of the 2 segments in terms of growth and margin.
I mean, obviously, we give a guidance for the frame, a CAGR of 6% to 8% from 27% to 29%. We are not particularly guiding whether it's front-end or back-end loaded, Fynn. But on the margin, it will not be, let's say, a big jump in the beginning. It will more continuous flow of improvement alongside volume growth, which is the main driver of that, utilizing the capacities, which we have then in place, and bring them into production. That's the main driver. And obviously, alongside volume growth and efficiency gains, margin will expand over time line.
Next question comes from Olivier Calvet, UBS.
I just have a couple of questions left. Maybe just a follow-up on an earlier question. Your total vaccination exposure in 2025, ex-mRNA, was that 10% to 15%? Would that be fair?
Then the second question would be just on the U.S. growth plan. So I just wanted to confirm that your current CapEx guidance is ex U.S. growth and ask how much CapEx you would need if instead of your initial plans you decided to, let's say, add a syringe plant to the Lebanon site. That would be question number 2. Maybe I stop there for now.
So let's start with the vaccination exposure '25 without mRNA. Yes, you're right. With your assumption of about 10% to 15%, you're absolutely right. And talking about U.S., what we're actually doing is we are working on further expansion plans, I have to say, in the U.S., mainly glassrooms is under discussion. Yes. And as you know, we have already expanded last year sterile vial production in the U.S., which was definitely helpful, and we have also expanded vial production. So that is already done, and now, we are discussing next possible phase.
Okay. Okay. And then just on ...
Maybe Olivier, just to, let's say, complement to what Andreas just said, as you highlighted a question around CapEx. I mean, in the CapEx outlook for 2026, we have not included a U.S. expansion project yet. And that would at least not in the beginning, be material. Let's put it like that.
Yes. Makes sense. And then just on drug containment. So it was up nicely in Q4 after being down in Q3. So I'm just wondering if you expect this to grow in the similar magnitude as in Q4 next year? Or what's your expectation in drug containment for '26?
Olivier, can you repeat your question? It didn't come across to our side.
Sure. So drug -- or our core containment, it was nicely up in Q4 after being down in Q3. I just wanted to check if you had any color on your expectations for next year.
Yes, that is a good question and a good, let's say, pick up. I mean, we see our core business as a good prospective business in which we have also invested, I mean, with the plant in Serbia. And we see that a continuous growth at lower single digits. But actually back to a growth mode again after the destocking effect is done.
Okay. That's helpful. And final one, just on the generic sema opportunity. Could you give us a sense of whether your 2026 guidance includes any benefits from the generic semaglutide in international markets? Or is that not really a benefit?
I would say it's a bit too early. Of course, we know that there are many people entering or starting to enter the field, yes, as we have many players in India. Basically, with one source, there are 10 players behind. And then, we have, of course, all these China activities. But it's a bit too early, I would say that we really see it significantly in our numbers.
So we have 12 more minutes, and we have some more people on the queue, so please reduce to 1 or 2 questions.
The next question comes from Charles Weston from Royal Bank of Canada.
Firstly, just a statistics question, please. How much of your 2025 revenue is related to GLP-1? And what do you envisage that being in 2026?
And then, my second question is on CapEx. You've guided to EUR 140 million to EUR 160 million, which is kind of mid-teens as a percentage of revenue, but you've only got medium-term growth in the mid- to high single digits, and you've invested substantial amounts in Serbia and Hungary and others. So why do you need to spend so much -- continue to spend so much? And can you perhaps refer to utilization rates of your current sites? And might your investments drop over the next few years?
Thank you, Charles, for your question. So I start with, obviously, the GLP-1 portion, although I will not be precise on that as we are not guiding by, let's say, separate application. Though, actually in 2026, it's going to be a growth element of the guidance clearly because we see a strong uplift of volumes in that segment, whilst we have the negative one, which obviously goes against that. Yes. And that is in a different sector in a way. And we expect GLP-1 being the main contributor amongst the specialty and ready-to-use contributions for the growth '27 to '29. So we see a very intact underlying market dynamic for us towards GLP-1.
When it comes to CapEx investments, I mean, these are CapEx investments typically ranging over 2 to 3 years. So a program started in '24 will end in '26 or '27. And obviously, we will complete the, let's say, started investments, which are focusing on high-value solutions in the first place that we are reconsidering some investments for new geopolitical, let's say, directions like what Andreas has mentioned that we potentially put another line into the United States or even accelerate investments in India, for instance. That is a normal undertaking of assessing opportunities, demand changes, and let's say, patterns within our, let's say, end customer areas. So the length of investment, you should expect as our trust in future business. And that's why we keep that up.
Okay. So mindful of time, but just if I can just slightly push you on the GLP. You've given us quite a specific information for mRNA. You've given us a relatively tight range for vaccines. And obviously, GLPs would be a major growth driver for the next few years. So can you give us some sense of what that percentages was or is going to?
I mean, I would like to give you a little bit of a reflection. The GLP-1 portion of revenue in the prior year significantly improved over 2025 and is now clearly double-digit revenue share of total revenue. And we expect to be a contributor of revenue growth at a double-digit rate for us. And that should give you a little bit of indication. So from 2024, below the double digit into double-digit 2025, continuing with a strong growth momentum. Other than, I cannot be more precise. Thank you, Charles.
Next question comes from Christian Ehmann from Berenberg.
I'm left with only one. Going forward for your GLP-1 assumptions and market growth expectations, what is your internal model for the difference between or the share between orals and injectables going forward?
Oral, of course, we have also many discussions about that, that will be somewhere in the range, I would assume 2030, 15% to 20%. But of course, we have to look into it. There are other numbers also around. We know that. And what we are doing is basically, as we have our contracts with the big guys, of course, we are trying to approach the new ones there and be also part of the game and will have a certain -- yes, certain percentage in the portfolio is also for sure. But so far, we are fully booked with what was agreed between us and the customers and looks stable from today's point of view, I would say. And then, of course, you have new opportunities with new players.
Next question comes from Pallav Mittal from Barclays.
A couple of questions. So firstly, I mean, in FY '24, you had lost a polymer syringe customer, which impacted FY '25. Now, you are highlighting a glass syringe order loss from a key customer, which will impact FY '26. So what I'm trying to understand is, how can you make sure that you don't lose such big orders irrespective of the, I would say, market sort of challenging environment every year? And how does your visibility look like in terms of those longer-term contracts? So that's the first one.
And then secondly, can you just quantify the impact from ramp-up costs in 2025? And how that should change in 2026?
I'll take the first one. What we cannot avoid is when we are working with big customers and big volumes that something like that is happening. But just to give you one example, what we are doing, right, we talked about the lost polymer customer in the past. So in these cases, when the risk is extremely high, we have -- usually, we have contracts in place, and these contracts are fully covering our expenses. At least, the investment is fully covered by customer contracts that can be either prepayment or that can be take-or-pay conditions.
So the money is not a risk, which we spend for the investment. What is, of course, a risk is further future turnover sometimes and margins or EBIT. So -- and of course, we prefer to sell instead of getting just the money from the contracts. That is clear. But if you want to play in these games, you have to take also some certain risks and the insurance which you can get is somehow by prepayment as a customer through financing. But you cannot fully avoid that something is not -- that everything is developing as you expect. That is 100%, you cannot guarantee that that's possible. That is an entrepreneurial risk which you have to take. And what you can do is you can reduce the risk exposure by having good contracts in place. And that is something we always have. That's something we had with mRNA vaccinations, for example. We have it also with vaccination programs, and we have it also with GLP-1 exposures. So it's big contracts.
And to the second point, I mean, ramp-up costs for, let's say, factory build-out in Serbia and Hungary have been, and I say, in the high single digits for 2025 and expected to be in the mid-single-digit euro for 2026. So a little bit of a reduction, but still a substantial additional ramp-up until the factories are fully operational.
So the next and the last question comes from Ed Hall from Stifel.
Just one from the annual report, it mentions that customers are still working through their own stock. I was wondering if you could quantify which product segment? Is this still reference to vials? Is this related to syringes or a mixture of both? I think that would be quite helpful.
And then finally, just on GLP-1 growth, how much was coming from syringes versus other areas like vials and cartridges, just given the prominence of compounders in the U.S. this year? That would be really helpful.
That is really going too much into detail. These are numbers we will not disclose, that we redefine by product group, GLP-1 syringe, cartridge, sterile cartridge, vials. So that is far too much, yes. And that's something we would also not disclose in the future. Sorry for that answer, but there's too much detail.
And just for the first question, you mentioned that customers are working through their own stock. Is there any reference to that? Is this still related to prior issues that you as an industry had seen? Or is this reference to new areas?
I mean, what we do see that in the DCS segment, we have basically overcome the stock topic, and basically, the depletion of stock in 2025. So that's why we see growth. And obviously, we have within the other areas the normal stocking areas for new applications to come. And not that we have specifically guided that we see, let's say, a stocking issue to my knowledge. I don't know where you make this reference to.
Thank you very much, everyone, for the interest in SCHOTT Pharma, your time today and your questions. This concludes our call. We are looking forward to meeting you in person during the upcoming conferences, be it in New York, Frankfurt or London. Also, on behalf of Andreas and Reinhard, I wish you a great rest of your day, and Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year 2026. Thank you very much, and goodbye.
Financial data from SCHOTT Pharma
Revenue
Revenue is the sum of all sales generated by a company, e.g. for its products or services.
Revenue (TTM) metric explainedDirect Costs
Direct costs are the costs incurred directly in connection with the manufacture of the product or service.
Gross Profit
Gross Profit indicates how much of the revenue remains in the company after deducting direct production costs. If the percentage share of sales is calculated, this is referred to as the gross margin.
Gross Profit metric explainedSelling and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) include all expenses for marketing and sales as well as the general administration of the company.
Research and Development Expense
Research and development costs (R&D) provide information on how much the company invests in the research and development of its products. The costs are particularly interesting as a percentage of revenue and in comparison to direct competitors.
EBITDA
EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization) is the company's earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. The EBITDA margin is calculated as a percentage of sales.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation represents reductions in the value of the company's assets (e.g. due to wear and tear on machinery).
EBIT (Operating Income)
EBIT (Earnings Before Interest and Taxes) is the company's profit before interest and taxes, also known as the operating income. The EBIT Margin is calculated as a percentage of sales at
.
Net Profit
Net Profit represents the profit or loss after deduction of all costs.
Net Profit metric explainedStocksGuide Premium
| Jun '26 |
+/-
%
|
||
| Revenue | 1,017 1,017 |
4%
4%
100%
|
|
| - Direct Costs | 700 700 |
8%
8%
69%
|
|
| Gross Profit | 317 317 |
4%
4%
31%
|
|
| - Selling and Administrative Expenses | 134 134 |
5%
5%
13%
|
|
| - Research and Development Expense | 26 26 |
3%
3%
3%
|
|
| EBITDA | 256 256 |
3%
3%
25%
|
|
| - Depreciation and Amortization | 88 88 |
16%
16%
9%
|
|
| EBIT (Operating Income) EBIT | 169 169 |
11%
11%
17%
|
|
| Net Profit | 137 137 |
7%
7%
13%
|
|
In millions EUR.
Don't miss a Thing! We will send you all news about SCHOTT Pharma directly to your mailbox free of charge.
If you wish, we will send you an e-mail every morning with news on stocks of your portfolios.
SCHOTT Pharma Stock News
Company Profile
StocksGuide Premium
| Head office | Germany |
| CEO | Mr. Reisse |
| Employees | 4,839 |
| Founded | 2022 |
| Website | www.schott-pharma.com |


