BKW Stock price
📊 Peer Group
📈 What is it?
The peer group consists of the companies with the most similar business model. They serve as a benchmark for putting a stock into context.
🧮 How is it selected?
Based on similarity of business model, meaning companies from the same industry with comparable products and a similar customer base. That's the only way to compare apples to apples.
🏛️ Why does it matter?
Whether a stock is cheap or expensive is best judged by comparison. A P/E of 18 or an EV/FCF of 20 can look cheap or expensive depending on the yardstick. The peer group gives you the most accurate one: companies with a similar business model that operate under the same conditions.
🎯 What does it mean for investors?
When a metric sits below the peer average, the stock is valued more cheaply relative to its competitors, and above the average more expensively. A discount to the peer group can be an opportunity, but it can also have a reason (for example lower growth). The comparison is a starting point, not a verdict.
AI Insights on BKW
Insights
Invest better with AI
StocksGuide Unlimited – full access to AI analyses
👉 More detailed insights
👉 Exclusive perspectives on opportunities & risks
👉 Clear answers to your questions
Invest better with AI
StocksGuide Unlimited – full access to AI analyses
👉 More detailed insights
👉 Exclusive perspectives on opportunities & risks
👉 Clear answers to your questions
Invest better with AI
StocksGuide Unlimited – full access to AI analyses
👉 More detailed insights
👉 Exclusive perspectives on opportunities & risks
👉 Clear answers to your questions
Invest better with AI
StocksGuide Unlimited – full access to AI analyses
👉 More detailed insights
👉 Exclusive perspectives on opportunities & risks
👉 Clear answers to your questions
Is BKW a Top Scorer Stock based on the Dividend, High-Growth-Investing or Leverman Strategy?
As a Free StocksGuide user, you can view scores for all 9,134 stocks worldwide.
StocksGuide Premium
StocksGuide Unlimited
Key metrics
📘 Market Capitalization
📈 What is it?
Market capitalization shows how much a company is currently worth on the stock market.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It helps classify companies by size (Large, Mid, Small Cap) and indicates their market presence and relative stability.
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Large-cap companies tend to be more stable, often pay dividends, but may grow more slowly.
- Smaller firms may offer higher growth potential but come with more volatility.
- Market capitalization is a useful indicator of company size — but not a measure of whether a stock is undervalued or overvalued.
📘 Enterprise Value (EV)
📈 What is it?
Enterprise Value represents the total cost to acquire a company — including its debt and excluding its cash reserves.
🧮 How is it calculated?
(= Market Cap + Net Debt)
🏛️ Why is it important?
EV gives a more complete picture of a company's value than market cap alone and is used in key valuation ratios like EV/FCF or EV/Sales.
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Enterprise Value shows the true cost of buying a company, including all financial obligations.
- It is more accurate than just looking at market cap, especially when comparing companies with different levels of debt or cash.
- Professional investors prefer EV-based multiples because they better reflect the company’s full financial footprint.
📘 Net Debt
📈 What is it?
Net Debt shows how much debt remains after subtracting a company’s available cash reserves.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It indicates how dependent a company is on borrowed money and how easily it can service its debt in the short term.
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Low or negative net debt signals financial strength and flexibility.
- Companies with strong cash positions are better positioned in crises.
- High net debt increases financial risk — especially in environments with rising interest rates or economic downturns.
📘 Cash
📈 What is it?
Cash represents all liquid assets a company can access immediately — including cash, bank deposits, and short-term investments.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It reflects a company’s financial flexibility and resilience — enabling investments, buybacks, or buffer in downturns.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A strong cash position means greater room for maneuver and crisis resistance.
- Cash-rich companies can invest, pay down debt, or repurchase shares.
- But excess idle cash might indicate a lack of growth opportunities.
📘 Shares Outstanding
📈 What is it?
Shares outstanding represent the total number of a company’s shares currently held by investors — excluding treasury stock.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It’s the basis for key metrics like Earnings Per Share (EPS), Market Capitalization, or the Price/Earnings ratio (P/E).
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Fewer shares in circulation typically increase earnings per share — making each share more valuable.
- Share buybacks reduce the number of shares and boost per-share metrics.
- Issuing new shares does the opposite — diluting shareholder value and lowering per-share figures.
📘 Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E)
📈 What is it?
The P/E ratio shows how many times a company's earnings per share are reflected in its current share price — in other words, how "expensive" the stock appears relative to its profits.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
The P/E ratio is one of the most widely used valuation metrics. It helps investors assess whether a stock appears cheap or expensive compared to its earnings power.
🧮 Calculation
📊 P/E (TTM) = Based on earnings from the last 12 months (Trailing Twelve Months):🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low P/E may indicate undervaluation — or signal underlying issues.
- A high P/E may reflect strong growth expectations — or an overvalued stock.
📘 Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S)
📈 What is it?
The P/S ratio shows how much investors are paying for $1 of the company’s revenue – regardless of profitability.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
P/S is especially useful for evaluating growth companies or businesses not yet profitable. It reflects how the market values the company’s sales.
🧮 Calculation
Market Cap = CHF6.48b | Revenue (TTM) = CHF4.22b
Market Cap = CHF6.48b | Estimated Revenue = CHF4.50b
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low P/S may indicate undervaluation — or low profitability.
- A high P/S can reflect strong growth expectations — or excessive optimism.
- Especially helpful when evaluating companies where profits are low, volatile, or negative.
📘 Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales)
📈 What is it?
EV/Sales shows how much investors are paying for $1 of revenue — considering not just equity, but also debt and cash. It’s the capital structure–adjusted version of the P/S ratio.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It’s ideal for comparing companies with different levels of debt. It reflects a company's true cost relative to its revenue.
🧮 Calculation
Enterprise Value = CHF7.23b | Revenue (TTM) = CHF4.22b
Enterprise Value = CHF7.23b | Forward Revenue = CHF4.50b
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- EV/Sales allows for capital structure–neutral company comparisons.
- A lower ratio may indicate undervaluation; a higher one may signal strong growth expectations or overvaluation.
- Especially helpful when evaluating high-growth companies with low or negative earnings.
📘 Enterprise Value to Free Cash Flow (EV/FCF)
📈 What is it?
EV/FCF shows how many years it would take for a company to "pay back" its enterprise value using its free cash flow.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It focuses on real cash generation, ignoring accounting noise — ideal for assessing profitability and value based on liquidity, not earnings.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low EV/FCF may signal undervaluation and strong cash generation.
- A high EV/FCF might reflect weak recent cash flow or aggressive growth expectations.
- Best suited for stable, mature businesses with predictable free cash flows.
📘 Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B)
📈 What is it?
The P/B ratio compares a company’s market value to its book value — showing how much investors are paying for each dollar of net assets.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
P/B is commonly used for asset-heavy industries like banks or industrials. It helps assess whether a stock is trading above or below its net asset value.
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A P/B below 1 may signal undervaluation — or weak profitability.
- A P/B above 1 implies the market expects future value creation (e.g., brand, IP, growth).
- Best used for companies with tangible assets and strong balance sheets.
📘 Dividend per Share (DPS)
📈 What is it?
Dividend per Share shows how much cash a company pays out to shareholders for each share they own – usually on an annual or quarterly basis.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
DPS is the absolute value of the payout per share – crucial for income-focused investors and dividend strategies.
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A stable or growing DPS often signals a strong, shareholder-friendly business.
- DPS alone doesn’t tell you how attractive the payout is – the stock price also matters (→ see Dividend Yield).
- Long-term dividend growth is often a hallmark of high-quality companies – like the dividend aristocrats.
📘 Dividend Yield
📈 What is it?
Dividend yield shows how large a company’s dividend is in relation to its current share price.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It allows investors to compare dividend payouts across stocks, regardless of price or payout size.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A stable yield can reflect reliable distributions.
- Comparing 1Y and 5Y yield shows whether dividend growth keeps pace with stock price appreciation.
- A low yield isn’t always negative – it can signal strong past performance or growth focus.
📘 Dividend Growth
📈 What is it?
Dividend growth shows how much a company has increased its dividend per share over time.
🧮 How is it calculated?
5Y: Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR)
🏛️ Why is it important?
Consistently rising dividends are often a sign of financial strength and shareholder orientation – especially relevant for long-term investors.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Stable dividend growth is a sign of sustainable earning power.
- High dividend growth can significantly boost your total return:
- If a company pays $1 in dividends and increases it by 15% annually over 5 years, you’ll receive $2 per share in year 5 – twice as much as at the start!
📘 Payout Ratio
📈 What is it?
The payout ratio shows what percentage of a company’s earnings (per share) is distributed to shareholders as dividends.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It helps assess whether the dividend is sustainable – especially in relation to the company’s profitability.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low payout ratio means the company retains more earnings for reinvestment – typical for growth companies.
- A moderate payout (e.g. 25–50%) indicates a healthy balance between returns and reinvestment.
- High payout ratios may seem attractive but can carry risk if earnings decline.
📘 Consecutive Dividend Increases
📈 What is it?
This metric shows how many consecutive years a company has raised its dividend per share – without any cuts or pauses.
🧮 How is it calculated?
(Special dividends are not considered.)
🏛️ Why is it important?
A long track record of increases reflects financial strength, consistency, and shareholder commitment.
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A long dividend increase streak builds confidence – especially in volatile markets.
- Such companies are seen as reliable and income-friendly investments.
- The longer the streak, the stronger the company’s dividend discipline.
📘 Revenue
📈 What is it?
Revenue shows how much a company earns in total from selling its products and services – the gross income before any costs are deducted.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Revenue is one of the key figures to assess a company’s size, market position, and growth potential.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Growing revenue indicates rising demand and can be an early signal of future earnings growth.
- Comparing actual and expected revenue reveals trends in the market environment and analyst sentiment.
- Note: Strong revenue alone isn’t enough – margins and profitability matter just as much.
📘 EBITDA
📈 What is it?
EBITDA stands for “Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization.” It reflects a company’s operating profit before the effects of financing, taxes, and accounting depreciation.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
EBITDA is widely used to evaluate a company’s operating performance – especially across capital-intensive sectors or international comparisons.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high or growing EBITDA indicates strong operational profitability – independent of taxes, interest, or accounting methods.
- It’s especially useful for comparing companies across sectors or geographies.
- Important: EBITDA is not a net income figure – it excludes key costs like depreciation and interest.
📘 EBIT
📈 What is it?
EBIT stands for “Earnings Before Interest and Taxes.” It reflects a company’s operating profit after depreciation, but before interest and tax expenses.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
EBIT is a core profitability metric that shows how well the company performs in its main business operations – independent of capital structure and tax environment.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high EBIT indicates strong profitability from the company’s core business – before financial and tax effects.
- It allows better comparison between companies with different debt levels or tax structures.
- Compared to EBITDA, EBIT already accounts for depreciation and reflects capital intensity more clearly.
📘 Net Income
📈 What is it?
Net income is the company’s total profit – the amount left after all expenses, taxes, interest, and depreciation have been deducted.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Net income is the most comprehensive measure of a company’s profitability – showing how much actual profit remains after all business and financing costs.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Growing net income indicates that the company is managing all of its costs efficiently.
- It directly influences valuation metrics like P/E ratio and the company’s dividend capacity.
- Over time, net income trends reveal how resilient and profitable the business model really is.
📘 Free Cash Flow (FCF)
📈 What is it?
Free Cash Flow shows how much actual cash remains after a company covers its operating expenses and capital expenditures.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
FCF reflects a company’s real financial strength – regardless of accounting profits. It shows how much flexibility a company has for dividends, share buybacks, or debt reduction.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- High free cash flow means the company generates real, usable cash – independent of reported net income.
- It’s often the most reliable base for sustainable dividends and buybacks.
- Declining FCF can be an early warning sign – even when profits appear stable.
📘 Revenue Growth
📈 What is it?
Revenue growth shows how much a company’s sales have changed compared to the previous year – both on a trailing basis (TTM) and based on forward projections.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Forward = (Expected revenue ÷ Revenue in prior year − 1) × 100
Forward growth is based on analyst estimates for the current fiscal year.
🏛️ Why is it important?
Rising revenue signals growing demand, business expansion, and market share gains – especially important for growth-oriented companies.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Growth is the engine of long-term value creation – especially in tech and growth sectors.
- What matters is not just current growth, but its sustainability.
- Forward projections reflect whether analysts expect continued momentum – or a slowdown.
📘 EBITDA Growth
📈 What is it?
EBITDA growth shows how much a company’s operating profit (before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) has increased or decreased compared to the previous year.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Forward = (Expected EBITDA ÷ EBITDA from prior year − 1) × 100
The forward estimate is based on analyst projections for the current fiscal year.
🏛️ Why is it important?
Growing EBITDA indicates improving operational profitability – regardless of financing or accounting effects.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Strong EBITDA growth signals operational efficiency and scalability – especially during growth phases.
- EBITDA growth can be an early indicator of margin and earnings expansion – but should be assessed alongside revenue and EBIT.
📘 EBIT Growth
📈 What is it?
EBIT growth shows how much a company’s operating profit (after depreciation, but before interest and taxes) has increased compared to the previous year.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Forward = (Expected EBIT ÷ EBIT from prior year − 1) × 100
The forward estimate is based on analyst projections for the current fiscal year.
🏛️ Why is it important?
EBIT growth is a direct indicator of a company’s business performance – taking into account capital intensity through depreciation.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Rising EBIT signals improving operating profitability – even after accounting for depreciation.
- It’s especially important for evaluating companies with significant capital expenditures.
- Combined with revenue and EBITDA growth, EBIT growth provides a well-rounded view of operational progress.
📘 Net Income Growth
📈 What is it?
Net income growth shows how much a company’s bottom-line profit has increased or decreased compared to the previous year – both on a trailing basis (TTM) and based on analyst projections.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Forward = (Expected net income ÷ Net income from prior year − 1) × 100
The forward estimate reflects analysts’ expectations for the current fiscal year.
🏛️ Why is it important?
Net income is the ultimate measure of profitability. Growing net income signals stronger efficiency, cost control, and sustainable earnings power.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Stronger net income boosts valuation, dividend potential, and investor confidence.
- If profits stall while revenue grows, it may signal margin pressure.
📘 Free Cash Flow Growth
📈 What is it?
Free cash flow (FCF) growth shows how a company’s available cash – after covering operating expenses and capital expenditures – has changed compared to the previous year.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Free cash flow reflects real financial strength. Growing FCF indicates more flexibility for dividends, share buybacks, and reinvestment.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Declining FCF may point to rising investments, increasing costs, or weaker operating performance.
- Especially for dividend investors, FCF growth is critical – since dividends are paid from actual available cash.
- A negative trend isn't always bad, but it deserves closer attention.
📘 Gross Margin
📈 What is it?
Gross margin shows how much of a company’s revenue remains after deducting the direct costs of goods sold (like materials and production). It represents the company’s “raw profit” before fixed costs, taxes, and interest.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Or simply: Gross Margin = Gross Profit ÷ Revenue × 100
🏛️ Why is it important?
Gross margin indicates how efficiently a company can produce or procure what it sells. It is a key measure of product-level profitability and pricing power.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high gross margin suggests strong pricing power and efficient production.
- Falling margins may signal rising input costs or competitive pressure.
- Compared to peers, gross margin offers insights into the quality of a business model.
📘 EBITDA Margin
📈 What is it?
The EBITDA margin shows how much of a company’s revenue remains as operating profit before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization.It reflects operating efficiency without being distorted by financing or accounting factors.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
The EBITDA margin reveals how much operating income a company generates per dollar of revenue – independent of capital structure and tax effects.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high EBITDA margin reflects strong core profitability – before accounting distortions.
- It allows for effective comparisons across companies and sectors.
- A stable or growing margin signals efficient cost control and business scalability.
📘 EBIT Margin
📈 What is it?
The EBIT margin shows what percentage of revenue remains as operating profit after depreciation but before interest and taxes.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
The EBIT margin reflects a company’s core profitability while accounting for capital intensity (e.g. machinery, infrastructure). It’s especially useful for comparing businesses with different levels of depreciation.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high EBIT margin shows that the company remains efficient even after factoring in depreciation.
- It’s especially relevant for capital-intensive industries.
- Stable or rising EBIT margins over time are a strong indicator of pricing power and business quality.
📘 Net margin
📈 What is it?
Net margin shows how much of a company’s revenue remains as bottom-line profit after deducting all costs, interest, taxes, and depreciation.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Net margin reflects a company’s overall efficiency – across operations, financing, and taxation. It shows how much actual profit is generated from each dollar of revenue.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high net margin means the company is not only strong operationally but also manages financing and taxes efficiently.
- Peer comparisons reveal business quality and competitiveness.
- Declining margins despite revenue growth can be a red flag for rising costs or inefficiencies.
📘 Free cash flow margin
📈 What is it?
The free cash flow (FCF) margin shows how much of a company’s revenue remains as actual free cash after covering all operating expenses and capital expenditures.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
This margin reflects the true liquidity generated by the business – independent of accounting rules or depreciation. It’s especially relevant for dividends, buybacks, and reinvestment decisions.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high FCF margin means a company consistently generates strong cash flow.
- It’s a positive signal for financial stability and shareholder returns.
- The long-term trend is key – a declining margin may indicate rising investments or weakening operating efficiency.
📘 Equity Ratio
📈 What is it?
The equity ratio indicates what portion of a company’s total assets is financed by shareholders’ equity – in other words, how much it relies on its own capital.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
A high equity ratio reflects financial strength and stability, especially during downturns. It’s a key indicator of a company’s solvency and long-term risk profile.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Companies with high equity ratios are generally more resilient and less dependent on external debt.
- Low equity ratios can signal higher risk or aggressive financial strategies.
- Important: Always assess the equity ratio in combination with the return on equity (ROE). This shows not just how stable the company is – but also how efficiently it uses shareholder capital.
📘 Return on Equity (ROE)
📈 What is it?
Return on equity (ROE) shows how efficiently a company uses its shareholders’ equity to generate profit. In other words: how much net income is earned per dollar of equity.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
ROE is a core profitability metric. It helps investors understand whether a company delivers attractive returns on the capital provided by its shareholders.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high ROE indicates that the company is using its capital efficiently and profitably.
- It’s especially meaningful for capital-intensive businesses or firms with high equity bases.
- Important: A very high ROE can also result from high debt levels – always interpret it alongside the equity ratio to assess financial health.
📘 Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
📈 What is it?
ROCE measures how efficiently a company generates profits from its total capital – including both equity and interest-bearing debt.
🧮 How is it calculated?
It evaluates the return on all capital employed, regardless of how it’s financed.
🏛️ Why is it important?
ROCE is ideal for comparing companies with different financing structures. It shows how well management uses capital to create value for both shareholders and creditors.
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high ROCE means the company uses its capital efficiently – regardless of whether it's funded by debt or equity.
- The higher the ROCE compared to peers, the more value the company creates with its invested capital.
- Especially relevant for capital-intensive sectors like industrials, energy, or infrastructure.
📘 Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
📈 What is it?
ROIC measures how efficiently a company generates returns from the capital invested in its core operations – regardless of whether the capital comes from equity or debt.
🧮 How is it calculated?
- NOPAT = Net Operating Profit After Taxes
- Invested Capital = Operating assets minus non-interest-bearing liabilities
🏛️ Why is it important?
ROIC is one of the most accurate indicators of capital efficiency. Unlike return on equity, it is not distorted by leverage and shows how much value is created for all capital providers.
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high ROIC shows how effectively a company uses the capital that is truly invested in its core operations.
- Unlike ROCE, ROIC focuses only on the capital that is actively used to run the business – and that requires a return (i.e. interest-bearing).
- Especially useful when comparing companies with large amounts of excess cash or non-interest-bearing liabilities – giving a more realistic picture of capital efficiency.
📘 Leverage Ratio (Debt-to-Equity)
📈 What is it?
The leverage ratio indicates how much a company relies on interest-bearing debt (such as loans and bonds) relative to its shareholders’ equity.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
This ratio helps assess a company’s financial structure and risk profile. High leverage can enhance returns – but also increases exposure to interest rate changes and financial stress.
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low leverage ratio signals financial strength and independence.
- A higher ratio can improve returns in good times but increases risk during downturns or rising interest rate periods.
- 👉 Always interpret in the context of industry, capital intensity, and interest rate environment.
📘 Earnings per share (EPS)
📈 What is it?
Earnings per Share (EPS) shows how much profit is attributable to a single share – and is one of the most important metrics for evaluating a company's performance.
🧮 How is it calculated?
The diluted share count reflects potential new shares that could be issued through options, convertible bonds, or other rights.
🏛️ Why is it important?
EPS is the basis for many key valuation metrics like P/E ratio, PEG ratio, or payout ratio. It enables comparisons of profitability across companies, regardless of their size.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- EPS captures per-share profitability and is especially useful for comparisons over time or with analyst estimates.
- Rising EPS may signal consistent growth or share buybacks.
- Important: Always use diluted EPS for more realistic valuations – especially in companies with stock-based compensation.
📘 Free cash flow per share (FCF per share)
📈 What is it?
Free Cash Flow per Share shows how much free cash flow a company generates per outstanding share – after investments, but before dividends or debt repayments.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Free cash flow is calculated as operating cash flow minus capital expenditures (CapEx).
🏛️ Why is it important?
FCF per Share reveals how much real cash is available per share – useful for dividends, buybacks, or reducing debt. Unlike net income, free cash flow is harder to manipulate and often seen as a more reliable metric.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- High FCF per share signals strong financial flexibility.
- It shows how much capital the company can effectively reinvest or return to shareholders.
- Particularly relevant for dividend payers and capital-efficient businesses.
📘 Short interest
📈 What is it?
Short interest indicates how many shares of a company are currently sold short – that is, borrowed and sold by investors who expect the price to decline.
🧮 How is it calculated?
It reflects the percentage of a company’s shares that are being shorted relative to the total shares available.
🏛️ Why is it important?
Short interest serves as a sentiment indicator: A high value may signal skepticism or bearish expectations – but also increases the potential for a short squeeze if prices rise unexpectedly.
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Low short interest usually indicates market confidence in the company.
- High short interest can be a warning sign – or an opportunity if sentiment shifts.
- Especially relevant in volatile markets or ahead of key earnings releases.
📘 Employees
📈 What is it?
The employee count shows how many people a company employs worldwide – offering insights into its size, structure, and business model.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It helps assess operational scale, labor intensity, and cost structure. Combined with revenue and profit, it enables key metrics like revenue per employee or productivity.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high headcount can signal operational complexity – but also significant growth capacity.
- Revenue per employee is a key indicator of efficiency.
- Especially useful for comparing tech, industrial, or service-heavy companies.
📘 Turnover per employee
📈 What is it?
Revenue per employee indicates how much revenue a company generates on average per employee – a key measure of efficiency and productivity.
🧮 How is it calculated?
The employee count is typically taken from the most recent annual report.
🏛️ Why is it important?
This metric helps compare business models – especially between labor-intensive and technology-driven companies. A high value suggests automation, operational efficiency, or strong value creation per head.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high revenue per employee indicates a scalable and margin-strong business model.
- A low figure may reflect labor-intensive operations or lower value-add.
- Especially helpful when comparing tech companies to industrial or service sectors.
BKW Stock Analysis
Analyst Opinions
9 Analysts have issued a BKW forecast:
Analyst Opinions
9 Analysts have issued a BKW forecast:
BKW Events
Past Events
|
AUG
19
Q2 2026 Earnings Call
30 days ago
|
|
MAR
11
Q4 2025 Earnings Call
6 months ago
|
|
JAN
19
Special Call - BKW AG
8 months ago
|
StocksGuide Free
BKW — Q2 2026 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, dear participants. On behalf of BKW, I'd like to welcome you to the analyst and media conference on BKW AG's 2026 Half Year Results. My name is Marisa Fetzer. I'm Head of Corporate Topics within BKW's Corporate Communications Department and will be facilitating this online event.
I'd also like to welcome BKW's CEO, Robert Itschner; and BKW's CFO, Martin Zwyssig. They will be presenting BKW AG's half year results for 2026 shortly. And on the cover of our 2026 half year report, you can see Markus Späth. He is Project Manager, LTB Leitungsbau, part of BKW's network. As part of the Ultranet project, LTB Leitungsbau is upgrading existing power lines on the section between Mannheim and Phillipsburg in Germany and erecting numerous new pylons.
The aim is to enable the simultaneous transmission of direct and alternating current along the same route. Ultranet thus increases the transmission capacity for transporting electricity from Northern to Southern Germany. Before I hand over to Robert Itschner, I would like to briefly outline today's agenda. First, our CEO, Robert Itschner, will give you a brief overview of the results for the first half year of '26 and discuss the key developments over the first 6 months across our 3 business segments: Energy Solutions, Power Grid and Infrastructure and Buildings.
Then Martin Zwyssig, our CFO, will present the financial results for the first half year of 2026 in detail before I hand over to Robert Itschner to conclude the presentation part of this conference with an outlook for the current fiscal year. You will also have the opportunity to ask questions. We will round off today's online conference with a comprehensive Q&A as is customary. Please submit your questions in writing at any time during the presentation. We will answer them during the Q&A.
Let's now start with a detailed explanation of BKW's half year results of '26, and I'm pleased to hand over to our CEO, Robert Itschner.
Thank you very much, Marisa. Ladies and gentlemen, good morning. I would like to also extend a warm welcome to you on the occasion of BKW's online Analyst and Media conference for the 2026 half year results. As always, I'd like to take this opportunity before our CFO, Martin Zwyssig, delves into our financial results to present an overview of the key figures and say a quick word about developments in our business segments.
Our half year at a glance. In the first half year, we achieved a solid result, but the first 6 months were quite challenging. I'm going to say a bit more about that later on. In Energy Solutions, we are in a dynamic environment, which is characterized by the uncertain situation in the Middle East and the very dry weather with little wind. That said, we were able to capitalize on opportunities with Energy Solutions, particularly due to the significant fluctuations in the System Services business and in short-term trading. Thus, we were able to offset part of the negative results.
Overall, total operating income, operating profit in Energy Solutions declined compared to the previous year. In the Power Grid business segment, we've performed steadily in the first 6 months of the year with a total revenue at the previous level and EBIT only slightly lower than in the same period of '25. I'm particularly pleased with the continued positive performance in Infrastructure and Buildings, we're able to increase the EBITDA, EBIT and profitability in these business segments.
These developments are reflected in 4 figures you can see here. Total revenue, EBITDA and EBIT, they have fallen compared to the same period last year because the stable to positive trends mentioned in the Power Grid and Infrastructure Building segments were unable to offset the headwinds in the Energy Solutions business segment.
However, we were able to increase our net profit by 7%. As our CFO is going to explain in a minute, we have a higher free cash flow than last year, and we're able to increase our EBIT -- equity. How -- this is why BKW is a solid company. In the first half year, we were in a very stable situation. And we are on track with our Solutions 2030 strategy and are committed to our target of an EBIT of CHF 850 million to CHF 1.2 million (sic) [ CHF 1.2 billion ] in 2030.
Let me now talk about the individual business segments. Let's start with Energy Solutions. You'll see some KPIs on the right-hand side, which are related to our strategy. We want to enlarge our production portfolio to 3.6 gigawatts. We have been able to increase our portfolio with 80 megawatts. Many portfolios are in the pipeline. We'll talk about this later.
Another growth area is direct marketing. We're at 7.9 gigawatts. We have over our announced target, also thanks to the acquirement of Südvolt last year. And we're at 2.6 GW when it comes to virtual power plants. We're focusing on further scaling of decentral flexibility. As regards the enlargement of our portfolio. There's many highlights.
We've already informed you about Cerignola. We have commissioned the second phase of the wind farm in Southern Italy. That's very positive results, and we've received a building permit for the battery storage facility in Waltrop. It's a very large battery storage facility. We want to operate 300 megawatts ourselves. We're going to start construction soon, and we have already taken investment decisions. We're also investing in Switzerland according to plan, we have started the pump storage facility, Grimsel 4.
I'm very pleased to announce that. It's a very important component of the future energy system because it provides flexibility in the energy system, and we need that in the future. A smaller highlight, but also important for the future is the assurance of the agreement in principle with Swissgrid for the planned large-scale battery in Mühleberg for 400 megawatts. We are in the midst of putting this project into action.
We're also offering customer solutions. We were able to acquire the energy company, Volterres in France successfully. Volterres is providing wonderful growth opportunities. We were already present in France. As you all know, we managed customer plants. And with Volterres, we have obtained an additional interface with customers, and we believe that we are going to generate nice growth there because market regulation has changed in France.
And for the first -- on the 1st of January '26, large volumes were made available on the market, which were made available in the past by EDF regulated -- under EDF regulated conditions. We also have a 10-year management contract with the French project developer, Acacia. Here, we want to increase to 700 megawatts, when it comes to the management of third-party plants. So we're well on track there.
And finally, a very thrilling project that is contributed to our value creation, namely the energy solution hub was still launched in Switzerland in a first phase and which we're going to introduce in neighboring countries in the midterm. This project is about offering major customers the opportunity to benefit from integrated energy solutions. And we are going to offer management of energy assets for customers in an automated way. So this is a very interesting project, and it's wonderful to see how our customers' requirements are developing as we predicted some time ago.
Now let's move on to the power grid. We said we're going to invest CHF 1 billion until 2030. We're well on track. We've invested quite a bit in the past. These investments are carried out to make sure that we can support the energy tradition. We've grew -- many renewables have grown. You see here the situation as per June. So there was a massive increase recently, and the BKW grid now has 800 megawatt installed capacity. That's an additional increase this year. The increase is massive, and therefore, we need investments.
Now as regards to the rollout of the smart meters, we're well on track. We can conclude this project 1 year earlier than predicted. This is another very important precondition for the efficient management of the grid, and we have taken first steps already.
On the left-hand side of the slide, you see topics that I've already mentioned. The investment program is well on track. And I'm pleased to say that we're able to place a green bond for investments in the distribution grid. These investments are sustainable. And in the future, we will finance them with green bonds as well. And what's important for safety of supply is the certification of the central control center in accordance with the European standards EN 50518. We are one of the first grid operators who have been awarded this certification that fills us with pride and ensures that we have a solid infrastructure to operate.
Now I've already mentioned what is listed here on the slide. Let me move to Infrastructure and Buildings. Here, we've performed well in the first half. We've announced [indiscernible] for 2030. We are well on track. We're taking one step after the other. And my colleague, Martin Zwyssig will tell you in detail what's happening there.
This improvement was made possible by very strict financial discipline, but also good projects, especially when it comes to project management, hospital planning. Hospital planning is a huge market, especially in Germany. Here, we have -- we were able -- been able to be awarded the second construction phase of Bonn University Hospital. We're also active in data centers with Building Solutions in Switzerland, but also with engineering in Germany. We are currently carrying out several projects and are planning more. There's also high profitable growth in the high-voltage transmission system. As my colleague, Marisa said before, high investment volumes are possible there. We're well positioned.
And here, we've been able to achieve some milestones, in particular, the East Coast line, 185 kilometers of high-voltage lines were installed there, and we have doubled our transmission capacity there. An interesting project that shows our innovative abilities is a project that we carry out together with BOS, namely the refurbishment of the Weissenstein Tunnel near Solothurn.
Here, we introduced an automated drilling robot for the first time. Together, we tested it, and we were able to reduce overall cost by around 50%. There are videos online if you're interested in this project. When it comes to the service business, we were also able to achieve more growth, especially when it comes to Building Solutions, higher margins, less risk. And therefore, we're interested in expanding in these projects, and we'll also have several projects in the pipeline, namely bolt-on acquisitions.
We've made 2 acquisitions this year already, but many more are in the pipeline. We are interested in acquiring specific competencies and adding them to their network, which will support our long-term objectives. Now that's a short review of the last 6 months. And now I hand over to my colleague for the financials.
Thank you very much, Robert. Very good morning from me, too, and a warm welcome to today's half year call. As usual, I will now take you through the details of the 2026 half year financial results.
Let's start with an overview of key figures. BKW AG generated a revenue of CHF 2.2 billion in the first half of 2026. This represents a 3.1% decrease compared with the previous year. I will come back to the detailed performance when discussing the individual business segments.
Let's start with the EBIT. It fell by CHF 47 million or 15.1% year-on-year to CHF 262.7 million. By contrast, net profit increased by 7% compared to the previous year, namely to CHF 217.6 million. This is due to the positive performance of Mühleberg/STENFO which was able to offset the lower operating profit. The performance of the Mühleberg/STENFO was reflected in the financial results, which consequently increased by CHF 61.5 million compared with the previous year.
In the previous year, we had a loss of CHF 9 million. The operating net profit has been adjusted -- and the operating net profit amounts to CHF 169.1 million, representing a decrease of 19.6% compared with the previous year. The operating cash flow amounts to CHF 122.5 million despite the lower profit. Details on this will be provided in the commentary on the cash flow statement. The growth stands at 7%, significantly exceeding BKW's WACC.
And finally, the equity ratio. It was strengthened to 52.3%, thanks to retained earnings and actuarial gains. That's an increase of 1.4 percentage points compared with the previous year. Now this slide shows you which business segments are driving our performance, both in terms of total revenue and EBIT.
Let's first look at total revenue on the left-hand side. In the Energy Solutions business segment, decline amounted to CHF 41.3 million. The fall in consolidated revenue is, therefore, mainly attributed to the Energy Solutions business segment. In Power Grid, total revenue was slightly higher due to the increased transmission volumes.
In the power -- in the Infrastructure and Buildings segment, we recorded a year-on-year decline in revenue of CHF 24.6 million due to the focus on profitable business. And in the support functions, the decline is attributable to last year's sale of BKW's 2/3 stake in the customer service and billing provider, cc energie.
On the right-hand side, you see the EBIT bridge, which shows the negative impact of the Energy Solutions business segment on the group overall. At EBIT level, profit fell by CHF 15 million. Essentially, prices hedged at a higher level were unable to offset the lower trading results and the weather-related low production volumes. At Power Grid, higher costs led to slightly lower EBIT and Infrastructure and Buildings managed to increase its profit by CHF 3.9 million compared with the previous year despite a decline in revenue.
On this -- on the next slide, I will discuss the individual business segments, Energy Solutions, Power Grid and Infrastructure and Buildings in greater detail. The first segment presented on this slide is Energy Solutions. Total revenue for this business segment fell by 4.2% or CHF 41.3 million to CHF 950.7 million. The higher hedge prices are having a positive effect on total revenue.
As lower generation volumes already weighed on us last year, revenue is only significantly affected by the low production volumes. The main driver behind this decline in total revenue is the low energy trading margin. As regards to EBIT, EBIT amounted to CHF 156.9 million in the first half of the year, which is 24.2% or CHF 50 million below the previous year's level. The impact of the dry weather is not significant in a year-on-year comparison due to the similarly dry first half of 2025. However, it was a key factor in the normalized volume on which our planning assumptions were based.
The main driver of the reduction in EBIT is the electricity trading business, which was characterized in the reporting period by a difficult marketing environment with prices not driven by fundamentals due to the developments in the Middle East mainly. These erratic price movements made positioning in trading challenging. And the contributions to earnings from certain proprietary trading segments were particularly affected by this. By contrast, the intraday business continued to generate good returns.
Additionally, revenue opportunities arose in intraday trading, particularly during the heat wave in June. The positive fund performance of the Leibstadt/STENFO increased earnings by CHF 27.7 million compared with the same period last year. Let's now take a quick look at the generation mix, as you will see on the right-hand side.
In the first half year, BKW generated 4.6 terawatt hours of energy, which is around 3% more than in the previous year. The dry weather led to a further decrease in hydroelectric power generation of 0.1 terawatt hours to 1.6 terawatt hours. Production from wind farms and PV plants remained under pressure due to poor wind conditions. The increase of 0.2 terawatt hours is primarily attributable to the commissioning of the Cerignola wind farm. The nuclear power stations in which BKW holds a stake and the thermal power stations produced at the same level as in the previous year.
Now next slide shows hydro production and the Leibstadt/STENFO's fund performance in a multiyear comparison. Hydro production is at 1.6 terawatt hours and is once again below the levels of the previous year, which was already a dry one and below the long-term average and is therefore below our expectations. The Leibstadt/STENFO performance contributes as a reduction to the energy procurement costs when the trend is positive. At 6.1% in the first half of 2026, the performance was significantly above standard return of 2.8% and reduced energy costs by CHF 27.7 million compared with the previous year, as I've said before.
Electricity price volatility is a key driver of trading activities. You already know the left curve from earlier presentations. It shows the trend in forward volatility, which has now been extended to include the first half of 2026, whilst the trend in short-term volatility is now shown on the right-hand side. On the forward volatility enables trading margins to be generated on hedging transactions by close countering forward spreads. It has fallen substantially since its peak in '22 and explains the significant decline in trading results since then.
Now this is nothing new as such. Although this volatility increased slightly in the first half of '26, the level remains comparatively low. And this is weighing on the profit contributions from longer-term market positions and limiting the opportunities to realize trading margins. By contrast, short-term day ahead volatility has risen steadily since its low point in 2023. It stood at 137% in 2025 and rose further to 152% in the first half of 2026.
This high short-term volatility created additional trading opportunities in the first half of the year and bolstered earnings from the System Services businesses and intraday trading in particular. However, and this is also important, and I briefly alluded to this earlier, that if price movements are erratic and not driven by fundamentals, that is if they are not, for example, based on weather forecast where one can take a position, but are driven by social media causing corresponding price movements, and this makes it very challenging, if not impossible, to take a position. And consequently, no trading margin is realized. This was particularly the case in the first quarter of 2026.
Now let's have a look at Power Grid. Total revenue rose slightly by 3.5% or by CHF 3.5 million or 1.1%. Reason for the higher total revenue is the slightly higher transmission volumes. EBIT for the grid business, however, fell by around 1.9% from CHF 69.3 million to CHF 68 million. This was due to higher cost for energy transmission, owing to a lower run-of-the-river generation. More energy had to be procured from Swissgrid transmission grid, which led to correspondingly higher transmission costs.
Depreciation and amortization also rose by CHF 3.8 million as a result of the growing regulatory asset base arising from investment activities. These costs form part of the cost of production, which will be factored into future tariffs. Overall, the Power Grid business segment is a very stable business segment in terms of earnings with only minor year-on-year variations.
Now finally, the Infrastructure and Building segment -- let's first look at revenue. Revenue fell by 2.6% or CHF 24.7 million due to continued focus on profitable business. Organically, the decline stood at 2.8%. This was offset by a slight inorganic growth amounting to CHF 2.6 million or 0.2%. The EBIT increased to CHF 34.7 million, representing a year-on-year increase of CHF 3.9 million.
The improvement of operating performance is reflected in a decline in operating costs relative to total performance. This improvement has led to an increase in the EBIT margin from 3.2% to 3.7%. What's worth noting is the seasonality of the results in this business segment, which, as expected, is pronounced again this year. And to reiterate my comments from previous presentations, we can report another half year of continuous operational improvements in the Infrastructure business segment.
Let us now move on from the income statement to the cash flow statement. The group's cash and cash equivalents amounted to CHF 699.7 million at the reporting date, representing a decrease of CHF 155 million compared with the end of 2025, both blue bars on the slide. Operating cash flows before the use of nuclear provision amounts to CHF 168.4 million, which is CHF 43.4 million lower than the previous year. Main reason being the lower operating profit. As in the previous year, additional funds are tied up in the net current assets on a seasonal basis. I will talk about investments in more detail.
Investment activity -- the inflow of STENFO covers provisions utilized amounts to CHF 77.4 million as is high this year relative to the payments of CHF 45.9 million. So should be balanced out. This is due to an extraordinary payment of CHF 15.4 million resulting from the reassessment of decommissioning costs for the years 2020 and 2021. Taken together, this results in a positive free cash flow of CHF 96.6 million for the first half of '26, which at CHF 68 million is substantially higher than the previous year's figure of CHF 28.6 million.
However, this free cash flow was not sufficient to finance the dividends paid out amounting to CHF 211.3 million, but this must be assessed on an annual basis. We have, therefore, in the short term, mainly drawn on our existing liquidity, which explains the lower level of cash and cash equivalents compared with the end of December, as mentioned at the outset of CHF 699.7 million.
As announced, let's take a brief look at where BKW has invested. In the first half year of '26, capital expenditure on property, plant and equipment, intangible assets and the acquisitions of group companies totaled CHF 209.7 million. Of this, 49.4% was allocated to growth and CHF 106 million or 50.6% to maintenance.
In the Energy Solutions business segment, CHF 56.7 million were invested in growth. Part of this went towards the expansion of the Cerignola wind farm and the development of battery projects. With Volterres, if we were able to acquire an important energy provider in France, and that's an important step in our achievement of our Energy Solutions 2030 project.
In infrastructure and Buildings, small acquisitions were made thereby enabling further investment in growth and maintenance. And in Power Grid growth investments were made into grid reinforments and the strategic expansion of the electricity grid. And of the CHF 106 million spent on maintenance, the majority, CHF 56.7 million went to the Power Grid division for the upkeep of existing grid infrastructure.
This overview shows on the left-hand side, the trend in net debt and on the right-hand side, the maturity profile of our outstanding bonds and debentures. Let's start with net debt. On the left-hand side, you see liquidity bars above the 0 line, as I explained before. Here, you see short-term financial assets, which have been included. Financial liabilities remained stable at around CHF 1.89 billion. And as a result of declining cash and cash equivalents and the stable financial liabilities, net debt in dark blue rose seasonally by CHF 234.4 million as at the reporting date, reaching roughly the same level as in previous years.
On the right-hand side, you see our maturity profile, which is balanced out. In March, BKW successfully placed green bonds for the first time to fund investments in the distribution grid totaling CHF 200 million. The chart shows that BKW has an excellent diversification over the time horizon. This means low refinancing risks, great flexibility and corresponding room for maneuver for future growth financing.
An important factor -- not included in these figures is the syndicated credit facility amounting to CHF 1.5 billion. This serves as an additional liquidity buffer and has not been drawn down. The facility matures in 2031. On this slide, you see a schematic overview of the balance sheet trends. The balance sheet remains stable with only slight shifts. Current assets have decreased by CHF 0.2 billion due to lower cash and cash equivalents, receivables and short-term financial assets. Fixed assets, on the other hand, increased by CHF 0.1 billion, mainly due to ongoing investment activities.
Loans borrowings fell by a total of CHF 0.2 billion, and there was a reclassification of outstanding bonds between current and noncurrent borrowings based on their remaining maturity. Equity increased by CHF 0.1 million. The main reasons for the strengthening of our equity are, firstly and most importantly, the net profit generated of CHF 217.6 million and furthermore, actuarial gains from the valuation of employee pension provisions of CHF 39.3 million with strengthen equity. The dividends of CHF 211.3 million paid out in the half -- first half year are charged to equity.
The equity ratio continues to rise by 0.8 percentage points to 53%, which underpins further growth and enables us to continue to play an active role in shaping the energy transition. And finally, a comment on the return on capital employed on the ROCE and the net debt to EBITDA. The ROCE stands at 7%, thereby significantly exceeding BKW's cost of capital with the exception of the record year '22, which remains very stable. Shown on the right-hand side is the net debt-to-EBITDA ratio, which has stabilized at a figure slightly above 1.
And with that, I conclude my remarks. I hand back to Robert Itschner for the outlook. Thank you very much for your attention.
Thank you very much, Martin. I'd like to have a quick look at our strategy, in particular, on market potentials, which continue to be very positive. We understand our market segments better than 2024. We have understood that our potential is even higher if you look at midterm growth.
I'm not going to bore you with lots of figures, but I'm just going to pick out a few. Investment need for electricity in Germany until 2040, around CHF 600 billion to CHF 630 billion. In Switzerland, there's another CHF 40 billion to CHF 50 billion, big figures. Now if you look at infrastructure, in particular, in the EU, we see that investment needs are immense, particularly in Germany. There's over CHF 50 billion by 2030 that need to be invested in schools and hospitals.
Motorway bridges is a big topic. In Germany, they are in need of refurbishment, approximately 8,000 of them will have to be refurbished. These data show that we have a lot of potential. The market is there. BKW has many opportunities, and we're going to use them to grow profitably.
When it comes to the implementation of our strategy, I'd like to show you our investment program. Around CHF 4 billion have already been allocated, more than 60%. That's the blue bar. CHF 1.8 billion have been allocated to projects, which will be executed in the coming months, CHF 1.6 billion according to our past plans will have to be allocated.
Now here, I'd like to inform you that we're not going to take investment decisions just to take them. We're only investing in profitable projects and that applies to all of our business segments. Now what is not shown here are our investments in the Oberhasli power plants. Another CHF 200 million are expected by 2030. It shows that we have a good position. You see that in the comments that we're receiving. We're making huge progress.
We've allocated over 50% in Energy Solutions. This is due to our very strict capital discipline. It's only 50%, not more. But our pipeline, we believe, is very strong, and we're going to further develop it, and we plan to realize upcoming projects. I've already mentioned Power Grid. The planning situation is very good here. Everything has been planned for until 2030. Of course, it's simpler in a regulated system.
As regard to infrastructure and buildings, we're permanently developing our pipeline for upcoming investments. The cycle is shorter than in the energy business here. But in a nutshell, we're well on track, and we're going to execute all of the investments that are going to pay into our 2030 strategy. And that brings me to the end of my presentation and my conclusion.
BKW's situation is sound financially. Our market situation looks good. Markets continue to offer significant opportunities for profitable growth. And in the first half of the year, we have achieved important milestones in the implementation of our 2030 strategy, and we are on track with our planned investment, as I explained earlier on, giving you some examples.
Against this backdrop, we believe that we are going to continue generating profitable growth in attractive markets. As regards the rest of 2026, for Energy Solutions, Infrastructure & Buildings, we expect significantly stronger performance, whilst Power Grid is set to perform steady in line with our expectations. Against this backdrop, we anticipate an EBIT for the full year '26 to be at the lower end of the range of CHF 650 million to CHF 750 million announced at the beginning of the year.
Thank you very much, Robert and Martin, for your presentations on the half year results for the year 2026. That brings us to the Q&A. It's time for your questions, ladies and gentlemen. And we have already received some questions.
Let's start with the first question. First question submitted by [indiscernible] from UBS. The question was asked in English. How much of the H1 Energy earnings shortfall in the Energy Solutions was related to the temporary Middle East-related market disruptions? And to what extent have those effects normalized in Q3 so far?
Now I'll pass that question to our CFO.
Well, the substantial sums, in particular, which came about in the first months of the first half year and are due to the developments in the Middle East. Large parts of these items that weighed down on our results were due to events in the first quarter. This didn't normalize in the second quarter -- in the third quarter, we already realized in April that trading results normalized and came back to planned numbers or even above.
Part of the downside we had in the first quarter was due to valuations. We have a fair value rate that will be corrected in the future. And therefore, we said temporary -- we use the term temporary in our press release.
Thank you very much for this reply. Further question by [indiscernible] In the Energy Solutions, BKW has added resources in its trading division volatility in 2026, if results are lower. What will change in the second half year 2026? Why? That's the first part of your question. And the second one is, why are you not growing electricity capacity faster in Europe as electricity demand has started to accelerate and the outlook is positive. I'd like to pass that question to our CEO.
Well, there's 2 things in the second half year. We have looked to strengthen of our capacities. We've observed change there due to the drought. We believe that in the second half year, we'll have good potential there. We'll be able to generate good results. Secondly, as I said before, there's this temporary effect of assessment of our positions, which will be corrected mostly, I believe these are the two topics in the trading area, which make us -- lead us to believe that we will close that gap.
As regards the expansion of our production portfolio, I've already gave you some information on that. It's the fact that energy demand is rising significantly. We believe, however, that we have to look closely at the investments we want to make. There are some very unrealistic prices and price expectations on the market. We're, therefore, carefully selecting our choices. With Cerignola, we've proven that we are able to take very good decisions. This wind park is a very promising investment, and we are going to strengthen profitable investments in energy production.
Thank you very much. We have 4 partial questions by Emanuele Oggioni from Kepler Cheuvreux. I'm going to ask the questions one after the other because they do not all -- they cannot be fit in one context. First question, could you explain in more detail the trading breakdown among the different moving parts considering that the ancillary services and the intraday trading profit from elevated short-term volatility, but this was not sufficient to offset the other parts?
Well, let me start. A breakdown of results will not be provided. But one thing about System Services in terms of their volumes. On an annual basis, we have CHF 80 million to CHF 100 million generated. We look at half year by half year, and we believe that -- we see that we were -- we doubled our results. Profits from services cannot offset trading results, however.
Second question by Emanuele Oggioni. It relates to hydro production. Hydro production was only 0.1 terawatt-hours lower year-on-year. What is your expectation for the second half year 2026 compared with 2025?
Well, first of all, we are comparing a very dry year and even drier year with a dry year last year. We had expected a different situation. We're calculating with long-term rainfall averages, and we're always looking at rainfall data at the end of the year to plan for the next year. And here, we're comparing to very dry years.
As a result, weather, well, there, I can't make any predictions, but lake filling volumes are very low. If you look at BFE data, you will see that in the canton of Grisons, they're very low. In Valais, they're around average volumes. And elsewhere, we're very below averages. That is an indication of what is to be expected in the next year, and that affects our planning.
The Oberhasli power plant has good results because glaciers have been melting as a result of the heat. Of course, we need more rain, much more rain. We calculate based on statistical averages. But of course, now we're taking into consideration the filling volumes for planning of upcoming years.
Next question regards Grimsel 4, remain with hydro production. Could you add more color on the expected EBITDA contribution from Grimsel 4? And when is the EBITDA contribution to be expected?
Well, Grimsel 4, as a matter of fact, will only be connected to the grid in '31. We're calculating with a 2-figure EBITDA contribution from that year. So that's a very good development. But of course, we're not going to publish detailed data, but we're factoring a 2-figure EBITDA contribution.
Thank you very much. Last partial question from Emanuele Oggioni. Could you update on 2029 hedging?
Yes, we can. You may remember that we said that we moved from a strict hedging mechanism in -- at the beginning of the year when we hedge the 3-year ahead production in a short time, we've maintained that system. Not everything is hedged for 2029. However, some positions are left open. We do that intentionally, and therefore, we cannot tell you at this point in time what the exact average price will be. Thank you very much.
Thank you very much, Martin. There's another question coming in from UBS, Alexandra Bossert in particular. I think we've already talked about. Let me present the question. Can you tell us something about the impact of the very dry summer on the first half year and the expected second half year figures? Robert already said that we cannot predict the weather, but maybe you want to add something?
Not really, maybe just to say that as a result of the dry weather, we had very little wind as well. We believe -- we're hoping for changing weather for more wind. This is going to boost our wind production. We hope that the weather situation normalizes.
So let's hope for rainy and windy autumn. Definitely, that's what we wish for. Thank you very much, Robert. There's another question coming in from [indiscernible] Question is, can you tell us about the situation of the dams after the long drought. Is this going to have a continuous negative effect on the second half year? Do you believe it's going to be bottlenecks there? Can you tell us anything about the Middle East?
Well, as I said, filling volumes vary. The big hydro capacities are located in the canton of Valais and the canton of Bern, as we know. Here, the situation doesn't look too dire. In the canton of Grisons, the filling levels are very low, and we have large facilities there, but things could change quickly if there's more rain in the next coming weeks.
Second question, Middle East and the developments there. We believe that there's not going to be a normalization of the situation in the near future. And of course, that's going to affect gas prices, in particular, in the mid and long term, but that might change. Right now, we believe that things are not going to change quickly.
Thank you very much. Let's continue to the next question. We have [indiscernible] from Montel. He has one question regarding Energy Solutions in the second half year. Do you believe figures are going to be more positive in the second half year? Why do you believe that is going to be so? The geopolitical situation continues to be very dynamic. And can you tell us anything about the hydro development in the second half year? I think that's what many people are interested in. So this question goes to the 2 of you.
I believe I've already talked about the trading results. Maybe you want to answer?
Well, we have negative assessment effects on the one hand. In the second half year, as we know, we've had some improvement to be expected there. The assessments will be corrected, we believe, and we'll be back on track in the second half year. As I said before, there are positions that are clearly plannable. And when we look ahead, that makes us believe that the development is going to be positive in the second half year. This is why we based ourselves on those planned data and positive figures in the second half year.
Let's now move on to Infrastructure & Buildings. [indiscernible] has one question. Which areas are not doing well? That's the first question.
We are continuously improving in all areas. I couldn't really tell you about one specific area that's not doing well. Of course, there's many challenges that's normal. Well, one thing that can be said is that infrastructure is not developed in Switzerland as fast as it should be given the needs for an energy transition. But we are well positioned on the market, and we are continuously improving our operative performance. Overall, I'd say that we're not doing as well everywhere as we would like, but we are continuously improving. Thank you very much.
And there's additional question by [indiscernible] that we've already partly covered. Let's stay with Infrastructure and Buildings. We have 2 questions that concern the objective of a profitability of 8% by 2030. Now question is many objectives are confirmed. Does that also concern the 8% by 2030?
Yes, that's our ambition. We believe that if the measures that we've introduced over the past 2 to 3 years become effective, we can further push growth. And we can also -- if we can improve profitability in our portfolio, we can achieve those 8%. Thank you very much.
Question by [indiscernible] He has a question about not allocated investments. You, Robert said what we had already allocated. Question is how many concrete projects are they for the not allocated CHF 3 billion investments? Given the multi-annual construction times, can these really contribute to the 2030 EBIT target? Should investment be significantly lower by 2030, could you still achieve your CHF 850 million EBIT target by 2030? Robert?
Well, we've said that we've already invested CHF 7 million at -- over CHF 8 million already allocated to projects. Therefore, I don't know what the CHF 3 billion are about. CHF 1.6 billion needs to be allocated. Of course, that's a challenge in itself, but we are convinced that we can do it. We are convinced that we will find good potential investments.
Now depending on technology, of course, projects take a long time to implement. We know that. But we have some very good projects, the Waltrop battery storage facility, for example, and will soon contribute to EBIT. And we are convinced that we will balance our portfolio in such a way that new projects will contributing -- will be contributing to profitability.
We have a question by Laura Bucher from Octavian AG. It's about the EBIT expected for Energy Solutions in the second half year. She has an additional question. On the pickup in energy EBIT in H2, just to confirm, do you factor any tailwind from the central fund? Or do you assume a normalized 2.8 performance?
We do that very systematically because we don't know how the -- how stocks develop. We look at performance achieved in the first half year, and then we calculate with standard term profit -- with standard returns. So normalized planned return for the second half year based on first half year figures.
We continue with the next question by Rene Rückert from Baader Bank again. Which additional revenue is to be expected from the Waltrop's battery project and which effect on the EBIT you expect once the project is fully implemented?
Well, battery projects are about flexibility and the EBIT effect they have is very important. Revenue is not that relevant because we want to feed in electricity into the grid when the prices are good. So it's not about energy volumes, but about feeding into the grid when it makes sense. We're not going to publish exact figures, but they're going to be in the 2-digit million range.
Thank you very much, Robert. I'd say we take another 3 to 4 questions, and then we will conclude our Q&A. Let me start with the next question by Patrick [indiscernible] IFS AG. It's about intraday volatility. And earnings in the balancing energy market as of '29, 2030. How are they going to develop if all planned battery storage plants are implemented?
That's a very good question. Of course, the market situation is going to further change and develop. We believe that the mentioned battery facilities give us a very good position. However, there are many plans for expansion of renewables. Therefore, there's a need for flexibility in the future. We don't believe that we're going to invest in assets that will not provide the returns we expect. We have very good facilities, very good plants and projects. I'm not talking about competitors' projects, but about our projects in particular.
Question by Peter [indiscernible] tax adviser. You've already sold most of the electricity for the year 2026. Can you supply it from your own power plants? Or do you have to buy from third-party providers?
Well, if we have customer agreements and our own capacity is not sufficient, then we have to buy electricity. Of course, that's not good for our business. We avoid that when we can, but that's reality sometimes. We always meet our -- the promises we make to our customers.
One last question for this Q&A. There's many coming in. Thank you very much for your interest. We will reply to your answers. We will contact you. Last questions we'll take on here is from Andreas Schneller from de Pury Pictet Turrettini. What about expansion of hydropower in Switzerland? Trift, I'm thinking of Trift and dam wall increases. What about nuclear energy and the dismantling of Mühleberg?
We are convinced that we'll start Trift and Grimsel wall expansion next year. Final decisions are still to be made and approvals need to be given. But I believe that we have a great deal of support for those projects given the current energy situation in Switzerland that we're going to implement those projects. But I don't think the effect will be visible before 2030.
As regards the Mühleberg power plant, we're well on track here. As was known, the fuel rods were stored some time ago. And now the dismantling phase has to be concluded by 2032. At the latest, we will develop a utilization plan by next year. We have an idea for battery storage. I believe we're well on track. If you're interested, please read the article published at NZZ last week. This article describes the current situation in great detail.
Thank you very much, Robert. Thank you for the detailed information provided. Thank you to you, our participants and for asking questions. All the questions that have not been answered right now will be answered directly. We will contact you.
Now, before we bring today's analyst media conference to a close, I would like to draw your attention to the upcoming events. On Tuesday, 10th of November 2026, we will carry out a 9-month business update call. It is carried out for the first time this year to enhance transparency with the capital markets between the half year and annual results. And the presentation of the next half year results will take place in Zurich in March. And that brings us to the end of this event.
Thank you very much again for participating. We look forward to welcome you again on Tuesday, 10th November '26 for the 9-month business update call. Thank you. Have a lovely autumn and see you soon.
BKW — Q2 2026 Earnings Call
H1 2026: revenue slightly down and EBIT fell ~15%, but net profit +7%, stronger free cash flow and balance sheet; 2030 strategy remains on track.
📊 Quarter at a Glance
- Revenue: CHF 2.2bn (-3.1% YoY)
- EBIT: CHF 262.7m (-15.1% YoY; EBIT = earnings before interest and taxes)
- Net profit: CHF 217.6m (+7% YoY)
- Free cash flow: CHF 96.6m (H1 2026 vs CHF 28.6m prior year)
- Equity: Equity ratio ~53% (up ~0.8 ppt)
🎯 What Management Says
- Strategy: Solutions 2030 remains the guide; target EBIT CHF 850m–1.2bn by 2030 and management says execution is on track.
- Capex discipline: ~CHF 4bn pipeline with >60% allocated; investments prioritised for profitable returns and financed partly by green bonds for grid work.
- Growth areas: Energy Solutions focus on batteries (Waltrop), wind (Cerignola), pump storage (Grimsel 4) and M&A (Volterres) plus scaling virtual power plants.
🔭 Outlook & Guidance
- Full year: Management expects FY 2026 EBIT at the lower end of the prior CHF 650m–750m range.
- H2 view & risks: Expect stronger H2 for Energy Solutions and Infrastructure & Buildings; Power Grid steady. Key risks are trading volatility (Middle East), weather-driven hydro variability and partly open 2029 hedges.
❓ Analyst Q&A
- Trading impact: Middle East shocks hit Q1 trading; management says much of the valuation drag was temporary and trading normalized by Q2/Q3.
- Hydro & timing: H1 hydro at 1.6 TWh (below long-term average); Grimsel 4 expected grid connection in 2031 with a low-double-digit million CHF EBITDA contribution thereafter.
- Transparency limits: Management declined detailed trading breakdowns; confirmed system services and intraday trading helped but couldn't offset proprietary trading losses; some 2029 positions intentionally unhedged.
⚡ Bottom Line
BKW shows operational resilience: weaker H1 operating profit driven by trading and weather, but net profit, cash generation and equity are solid. Execution on batteries, storage and grid investments supports the 2030 ambition, yet near-term returns depend on volatile power markets and hydro/weather outcomes.
BKW — Q4 2025 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. I would like to wish everybody a good morning to the audience here at the [ Video Hotel ] in Zurich and our esteemed participants in the live stream. On behalf of BKW AG, I would like to extend a cordial welcome to our analyst and media conference presenting the 2025 financial results.
My name is Marisa Fetzer. I'm Head of Group Topics for Corporate Communications of BKW. I would like to welcome on stage, Robert Itschner, CEO of BKW; and Martin Zwyssig, CFO of BKW. On the cover page of our 2025 annual report, you can see Farzaneh Abbaspourtorbati. She is Head of Long-term Asset Optimization for BKW. She's standing on the news Spitallamm dam 113 meters high, which impounds the Grimsel reservoir, high up in the Bernese Oberland. BKW holds 50% share in the hydropower facilities at the Grimsol by its stake in the Oberhasli power plants entity, KWO for short. Flexible generation facilities of this kind are key to the success of the energy transition against the backdrop of fluctuating solar and wind power generation. This is the reason why they are a key element of our BKW Solutions 2030 strategy.
Before I pass the floor to the BKW CEO, Robert Itschner, I would like to just quickly run you through today's program. Robert Itschner will take the floor in a minute to give you a quick glance at the result and will then go on to explain the most important developments of 2025 in our 3 business segments: Energy Solutions, Power Grid and Infrastructure and Buildings. He will then also explain the main thrusts for the current year.
After that, BKW's CFO, Martin Zwyssig, will discuss the details of the financial results for the 2025 fiscal year in detail. We will close the presentation with a short summary presented by Robert Itschner, and he will also present the EBIT guidance for 2026. As always, you will have the chance to ask questions during the question-and-answer session on the 2025 financial results. Questions from the live stream can be submitted during the presentation. They will then be answered during the Q&A, just like any questions from the audience here in the room. We will now proceed to the explanations on the 2025 financial results of BKW, and I'm happy to hand the floor to Robert Itschner.
Thank you very much. A warm welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to the analyst and media conference. On the full year results 2025, I'm very happy to inform you that we had a solid operating result. In 2025, total operating income of CHF 4.5 billion. This is also including the value adjustment of the Wilhelmshaven coal-fired power plant, EBIT of CHF 561 million and a net profit of CHF 388 million.
And I would like to go into a bit of a review of the year 2025. Now we have, of course, explained all our priorities in our strategy. We want to convert and expand the system. But there is also a sustained customer demand for specific Energy Solutions. And of course, we also need to expand and convert the grid infrastructure in Switzerland, but also abroad. There were a few headwinds. There was a little bit less wind, low wind levels than last year, and we had little precipitation. It is a dry year 2025, and therefore, hydro production, as we will see later on, is rather low. It is quite surprising to have such low wind levels, and this is all the more surprising because our wind farms are very well distributed over the entire Switzerland and Europe.
So this is quite remarkable. Now let us go into the individual business segments. First of all, Energy Solutions. We have very successfully started the implementation of our growth strategy. There were some challenges, of course, in the market. However, we have now new presences and offices in Zurich Düsseldorf, Paris and also Singapore. So there is a possibility of having 24-hour spreading possibilities.
We have strengthened our BKW portfolio. especially in wind and hydro, we've commissioned new power plants. Half of the Cerignola wind farm has been commissioned and a smaller hydropower plant in the Bernese Oberland, which is called Sousbach with 11-megawatt output.
Then we've already mentioned the expansion of our green electricity purchase agreements. We are very well on track there. Also when it comes to direct marketing, we have made a big step forward. We are now one of the biggest direct marketers in Germany, which is also supported by the acquisition of Sudvolt, for example. We are certainly doing great progress in this respect. The topic of virtual power plants is very important to us. We've been working on this very actively. So with Sudvolt, we've made a big step forward. This is about pooling of power plants so that they can be used optimally in the market.
This is just one example or a few highlights of 2025. We've already talked about Spitallamm before, which is great to see that we have been making progress there as well in terms of the project. Then a few success stories. Certainly, Zelestra, a very large wind farm in Italy. We've been working on this for 8 years now. It includes 29 turbines in Apulia in Italy with a total capacity of 125 megawatts. That's 800 landowners that we had to negotiate and find an agreement. It's a rather complex project.
We are on budget and on time with the construction of the entire farm. And parts of it have already been commissioned. Then Sudvolt, I've mentioned the name. This is an acquisition of a marketer of flexibility in Germany with a very good customer base, which is extremely important for us so that we can use rather flexibility solutions for our customers, and we've been building a bridge with regard to our customers, and we will expand this flexibility portfolio step by step.
Then another example for a large battery contract in Italy Zelestra in Italy, which we have been able to conclude. Then let's have a look at the pipeline in Energy Solutions. That's absolutely crucial for us. Parts of our investments have been invested in new production assets, for example, we just wanted to be very transparent here where we are at.
So we have a few in operation already that is now in 2026. And then we have the ambition of 2030 on the right-hand side. And then we can also see on the very right, the pipeline of the various businesses, whether they are in operation, under construction or in development or whether it is just an opportunity.
What you can see here, the pipelines are really gratifying to look at. Of course, they have to be expanded to some extent, but we are very happy with this set up, and we're looking optimistically into the future so that we can have more investing decisions in the future. For example, when it comes to hydro or battery energy storage systems. Hydro, of course, is something that will be coming to the market later on. We will construct, for example, the turbine hydropower plant, which is already under construction.
Once a year, we will update the situation with regard to the pipeline so that you can see how well we implement our strategy. When it comes to these projects, it always needs a little bit of time until it's reflected in our figures. But I do think that with regard to our pipeline, we can truly demonstrate that we are well on track.
Then when it comes to the investments in Power Grid, they've been a little bit higher in 2025, and we can live up to the expectations. Here, it's very interesting to see that we have progressed rapidly when it comes to the smart meter rollout. This has been improved strongly in 2025. So we will be able to conclude this project earlier than we thought. 400,000 smart meters is the goal, which will be completed in about 2.5 or 3 years from now.
A few success stories in the segment of Power Grid. First of all, the fact that we have a very high availability level in our distribution grid. That means that the grid is at a very good quality level. Then we've also had an average outage duration per end consumer, which amounts only to 16 minutes. This is really low in terms of European average, this is an absolute top figure.
So we are at a very high level. It doesn't have to remain at 16 minutes, but I think we've already reached a very high quality level here. I've already talked about the smart meter rollout. This is just a summary of what we've done. And then we've also had new constructions of transformers and substations. We have 16 that we've completed already now. Then the business segment of Infrastructure and Buildings, a few highlights here. Profitability has been increased in 2025 by 4%.
These are operating improvements. We are also increasing our portfolio here when it comes to efficiency, for example. And we also want to grow in certain parts of the market. We made a few smaller acquisitions, especially when it comes to project management, that is steering controlling project. That is a very gratifying business. We acquired a smaller company there with about 60 FTEs, and we have now a very solid position in the market there.
We have various rather big infrastructure projects that we've been realizing, especially when it comes to grid construction in Germany, as you could see on the picture before we started this conference, but also, for example, the bundling of rail activities in Switzerland has been progressive, and this is very successful.
The service share of service business in Building Technology is, to me personally extremely gratifying. It is a very stable growth figure there. And I think this should be highlighted, and we've certainly not reached the end of our ambitions there. We also have a few nice success stories that I would like to highlight.
For example, Chemofast anchoring in GmbH Willich, it's a huge logistic area that we are constructing. We did the whole planning for the building technology. Energy efficiency was, of course, of utmost importance, but also PV installations on the roof and various of our strengths and skills was included there.
A East Coast line, it's an extremely important core project for the energy transition, a large pipeline construction project in Germany with approximately 22 kilometers in line lengths. The total volume is EUR 147 million, 50% of which is with our subsidiary, LTB. Then we have been expanding our service business in building technology. We are focusing on certain tools here in order to reach our end consumers, this is a very interesting topic, especially in Switzerland with building solutions where we are -- have a very broad market share and market presence.
Let us have a look at the sustainability highlights of 2025 because this is a core element of our Solutions 2030. Now we have been able to reduce the greenhouse gas intensity by 24% compared to the 2022 base year, which is really gratifying. We are well on our way there. And to me, personally, it's also very important to see that we were able to decrease the number of accidents by 7%. That is the so-called lost time injury frequency. These are occupational accidents that lead to at least 1 day of inability to work.
So this was decreased by 7%. We've tried to demonstrate this slide a little bit differently. I don't know whether this will prove itself. We've tried to show you the opportunities on the left-hand side and the challenges on the right-hand side of this slide. I do not want to go here into every single detail, but we need to know that our services are certainly demanded in the market. However, there are challenges not only for this year, but also for the coming years. And going forward, there is a regulatory environment across Europe that is rather challenging and always moving with some uncertainties.
So we'll have to take a close look at this and see where the development proceeds to. We have opportunities, but also challenges in Switzerland, something that we've been observing smaller power plants that become part of BKW that is nice because we can cover the fixed costs there. However, it is, of course, at quite a lot of expenses to integrate such small power plants.
So we will see how this develops going forward. Then in terms of Infrastructure and Buildings, there is still a demand for expertise, especially in Germany, for example, for planning, implementation and complex infrastructures. We need to see how this proceeds, but we are very optimistic that the demand will remain at a high level and that we will play an important part in this.
So this is a rather balanced picture of how we make or see our outlook for the 2026 and for the years to come. Now what does this mean concretely for us? We're certainly pushing ahead with our growth ambitions. On the right-hand side, you can see the 750 megawatt of installed capacity when it comes to BESS and other power plants. We will have final investment decisions pending in the coming months. We've already commissioned 82.5 megawatts, for example, with Cerignola in Italy. So this portfolio is expanding. And the rollout is, of course, to be proceeded further when it comes to the smart meters.
And when it comes to Infrastructure and Buildings, we want to increase our profitability, of course, higher efficiency we also want to go into maybe very specific M&A opportunities. This gives us a high stability. Over the past 20 months, we've had great opportunities and projects. So with 20 months in engineering, 18 in Infra services and 10 months in Building Solutions, we are in a very gratifying position. So this was it from my part, and I'd like to hand over to Martin for the figures.
Thank you, Robert. I would also like to welcome you very warmly to today's analyst and media conference. It is a pleasure for me to talk you through the details of BKW's financial results 2025. Let me start by giving you an overview of our key figures. First of all, a short note on the value adjustment for our interest in the Wilhelmshaven power plant, which we communicated on 20th January. The adjustment was recognized as energy procurement cost, which is why it affects EBITDA. So that's usually if you have an impairment of an asset, it becomes recognized either in EBIT or EBITDA. And what we had to do is we have to increase our provision for onerous contracts.
The separate column shows the effect on the corresponding key figures. I will focus on the column highlighted in blue from here on. So the results excluding the value adjustment for Wilhelmshaven. BKW generated sales of CHF 4.5 billion in the 2025 fiscal year, as mentioned by Robert Itschner. This corresponds to a percentage change of minus 4.8% compared to the previous year. Excluding the value adjustment for Wilhelmshaven amounting to CHF 113.7 million, EBIT decreases by CHF 115.3 million or 14.6% to CHF 674.6 million year-on-year. This puts BKW slightly above the narrowed guidance range of CHF 650 million to CHF 670 million that we communicated on January 20.
Net profit declined with a decline of 26.1% net profit, it decreased more than EBIT to CHF 478.8 million. The reason for the strong decline in net profit compared to EBIT lies mainly in the decommissioning and disposal fund. Compared to the previous year, it performed less well, but still better than planned, and I will refer to this a little bit later.
The performance of STENFO for Mühleberg is reported in the financial results, which, therefore, decreased by CHF 82.4 million compared to the previous year. We had an anomaly, a positive financial result last year usually is not an expense. And the income taxes amounted to CHF 121.8 million, corresponding to a tax rate of 23.9%. That's slightly higher than the previous year where it was 21.1%. Operating net profit, that's the operating net profit adjusted for the performance of STENFO. It represents the operating performance of the group amounts to CHF 444 million, representing a decrease of 19.3% compared to the previous year.
Despite the lower earnings, at the EBITDA level, they were CHF 262 million. Operating cash flow comes to CHF 685.9 million. And I will come to the details on this when I comment on the cash flow statement. The return on capital employed is 7.5%, significantly exceeding BKW's WACC. Equity ratio, it was strengthened year-on-year by 2.7 percentage points to 51.5%, thanks to profit retention. And you can see this on the slide as well.
This slide shows you the performance of the business segments and their contribution to the results, both at the revenue and the EBIT level. First, on revenue on the left-hand side. In the Energy Solutions segment, the decline is CHF 170.9 million. A significant reason for the decrease lies in lower generation of hydro and wind power plants and the lower price level in the business with independent customers. At Power Grid, revenue drops by CHF 43.8 million due in the main to the EBIT neutral pass-through of the tariff reductions for ancillary services and the winter power reserve of Swissgrid.
Now for Infrastructure and Buildings, as the segment is focusing on more profitable projects, this leads to a slight reduction in organic revenue, while growth enabled by acquisitions can compensate for this, resulting in a small plus of the previous year of CHF 2.2 million. In the support functions, the decline in revenue is mainly due to the disposal of the 2/3 stake in the customer service and metering provider, CC Energy. Now EBIT on the right-hand side at Energy Solutions, the expected normalization of the energy market shows. Despite higher hedged prices, the EBIT is lower.
At Power Grid, higher costs for grid losses as well as higher depreciation due to a growing regulatory asset base have a negative impact on EBIT. We are very pleased with the performance of the Infrastructure and Buildings segment, where the result could be increased considerably. This is attributable to the successful and sustainable implementation of measures taken in previous years. In addition, substantial project impairments had to be made in the course of the year before.
The EBIT decline in support functions is primarily due to the lower equity income from Swissgrid as well as the elimination of shareholder activities, which is necessary for tax purposes at the level of BKW AG Holding. On this and the coming slides, I will go into more detail regarding our business segments, Energy Solutions, Power Grid and Infrastructure and Buildings.
First of all, Energy Solutions. And here, you can see the revenue. Revenue declined by 7.9% or CHF 170.9 million to CHF 1.995 billion. Higher hedge prices have had a positive influence on both revenue and EBIT. The lower generation from hydro and wind power plants leads to a reduction with corresponding impact on both revenue and EBIT. Thanks to a stronger focus at energy sales, quantity risks with large customers were deliberately reduced with an ensuing negative effect on revenue, but positively influencing EBIT.
Now EBIT comes to CHF 477.2 million in 2025 and is 18.6% or CHF 109.3 million below previous year's level. Higher hedge prices generated a positive impact on earnings to the tune of CHF 150 million, while lower volumes had an adverse effect on EBIT in the amount of approximately CHF 90 million. The ongoing market normalization dampens result from trading by around CHF 145 million compared with the previous year. The market environment during the reporting period was characterized by noticeable normalization on forward markets. Compared to previous years, there were no extraordinary revenues from short-term disruptive market events.
This return to more stable market conditions reduces earnings opportunities. The ancillary services and intraday business, however, continued to perform strongly. The KKL fund's profitability, which has decreased, so that's the Leibstadt KKL fund, but it's still above the target profitability. So it wasn't negative, but it used to be very positive. So we will see that impact of CHF 25 million later on.
Let's take a look at the production mix. BKW produced 9.2 terawatt hours of energy in the year under review, thus some 14% less than in the previous year. Due to the dry weather, the production of hydropower plants decreased by about 1.2 terawatt hours, and you can see this at the bottom of the slide. The production of wind and PV plants was lower by 0.1 terawatt hours because of unfavorable wind conditions. The nuclear power plants in which BKW holds ownership are producing the same amount as the previous year. Wilhelmshaven coal power plant was able to slightly increase production, whereas gas volumes decreased by or they decreased as a consequence of a transformer fire at the Italian Livorno Ferraris plant.
As mentioned earlier, both the further decline in price volatility on forward markets and the low production in a multiyear comparison have had a negative impact on the Energy Solutions business segment, as illustrated by this slide. The performance of the STENFO fund was above the target return of 2.8%. And I mentioned this, it has a less positive influence on earnings than in 2024.
Now for the volatility of electricity prices, and you can see this on the left. In 2025, there was a further decline and is the lowest of the last 5 years, so in the multiyear comparison. As mentioned, this reduces opportunities in trading and limits the possibilities of generating margin. Now the drier weather in 2025 led to a significant decline in production from hydro of 1.2 terawatt hours. And in a multiyear comparison, it was lower, and it was also lower than our expectations. Any positive performance of the KKL STENFO fund reduces energy procurement expenses. It was above the target return in 2025, but it has reduced energy procurement expenses by less than in the previous year.
Now Power Grid. Revenue declined by CHF 43.8 million or 6.5%. The main reason for the lower revenue is the EBIT neutral pass-through of tariff reductions for system services and the winter power reserve of Swissgrid in the amount of approximately CHF 41 million. In addition, the decline in grid usage adversely affects revenue with CHF 3 million.
The EBIT of the Power Grid business declined by approximately 7% from CHF 140 million to CHF 130 million. This decline is caused by increased costs compared to the previous year due to higher expenses in the wake of the energy transition. This primarily affects costs related to the smart meter rollout, deliberate staff reductions -- sorry, deliberate staff recruitment and project-related expenses. Depreciations increased by CHF 5 million in the reporting period as a consequence of the growing regulatory asset base due to investing activities. These costs form part of the general production costs, which will be accounted for in future power tariffs.
Now finally, on to Infrastructure and Buildings. Let's take a look at revenue. Revenue at INB rises marginally by 0.1% or CHF 2.2 million to CHF 1.975 billion. On an organic basis, INB saw a decline of CHF 22.3 million as a result of focusing on more profitable projects. This decline was slightly overcompensated by nonorganic growth of a bit more than CHF 24 million.
Now on EBIT, the Infrastructure and Buildings segment managed to grow EBIT to CHF 80 million, a year-on-year increase of CHF 23.1 million. The improvement in operating performance becomes apparent if you consider the reduction in operating expenses as a ratio of total revenue. Despite higher depreciation, this improvement leads to an increase in the EBIT margin from 2.9% to 4% in 2025. And this underscores the successful and stringent implementation of the measures from previous years.
And please allow me to reiterate comments from previous presentations. This is a positive interim result, and we are able to report on another year of continuous operational improvement in Infrastructure and Buildings. Let's now leave the income statement and proceed to the cash flow statement. Cash for the group stands at CHF 854 million at the reporting date, and thus, they declined by CHF 17.5 million lower than in the previous year. That's the 2 blue bars. The high operating cash flow before the use of nuclear provisions amounts to CHF 788.7 million and with about CHF 55 million is only slightly lower than in the previous year. Cash flow has declined less than EBITDA, and that is attributable to cash inflow from energy derivatives. Valuation gains from the previous year, which didn't impact cash back then have now had their effect on cash flow.
Next, you can see the bar that represents the cash for the decommissioning and disposal of Mühleberg nuclear power plant. At CHF 102.7 million, they are at the same level as last year and match nuclear provisions. I'm going to discuss investing activities in more depth in the next slide. At CHF 446.8 million, cash flow from investing activities before STENFO refunds is slightly above the previous year.
Cash inflow from STENFO matching the used provisions. So we have the provisions. They are built over time, amounts to CHF 94 million. It is important to note that the refunds from STENFO must vaguely match the payments made using the nuclear provisions. We could also say the influence from the decommissioning of nuclear power plant in Mühleberg is neutral for BKW in free cash flow terms.
The bottom line here is a positive free cash flow of CHF 333.1 million for 2025. And you can see the gray bar here across the first 4 bars there. This free cash flow is sufficient to finance the dividend of CHF 215.6 million. The high operating cash flow results in the mentioned figure for cash and cash equivalents of CHF 854.7 million.
Now as announced, let's take a look at where BKW has invested. In 2025, investments in property, plant and equipment, intangible assets and the acquisition of group companies amounted to CHF 456.6 million. Of these, 56% were for growth and CHF 200.9 million or approximately 44% were for maintenance.
Why does this figure differ from the investing cash flow mentioned earlier. Here, we only consider investments in property, plant and equipment, intangible assets and the acquisition of group companies and associates and exclude, for example, interest received and dividends received or inflows from divestments of property, plant and equipment or financial assets.
Now on growth. In the Energy Solutions segment, CHF 143.7 million were invested in growth, largely for the expansion of the Cerignola wind farm. In addition, we invested in battery projects in Germany, the expansion of district heating networks and the expansion of hydropower plants. At Power Grid, the investment in growth of CHF 60.3 million was for grid upgrades and the strategic expansion of the electricity grid. At Infrastructure and Buildings, we undertook smaller scale acquisitions and thus invested in further growth.
One note on maintenance of the CHF 200.9 million investment in maintenance, a major share of 122.4 million was for the upkeep of the existing grid infrastructure so in Power Grid. This overview shows you the development of net debt on the left-hand side and the maturity profile of our outstanding bonds and debentures.
The development of liquidity, you can see this on the left-hand side, the bars above the 0 line. I've already explained those. Here, short-term financial assets are additionally taken into account. Financial debt remains stable at around CHF 1.89 billion as a result of virtually unchanged cash and cash equivalents and financial debt -- net debt as of the reporting date has changed only slightly by CHF 36.7 million to CHF 838.2 million.
The maturity profile of our bonds and debentures is very balanced, shows excellent diversification along the time line. This means low refinancing risks, great flexibility and corresponding room to maneuver for future growth financing. Important and not included in these figures is the RCF of CHF 1.5 billion. This serves as an additional liquidity buffer and has not been utilized.
The facility has a term until 2030 and can be extended by 1 year. BKW's A rating allows us to adapt our financial framework to our needs at any time. This slide shows a rough outline of our balance sheet. Since the situation on the energy markets has eased, the balance sheet has remained fundamentally stable with only slight shifts. Current assets decreased by CHF 0.3 billion due to significantly lower gas reserves.
Noncurrent assets increased by CHF 0.2 billion, mainly due to our ongoing investment activity. Liabilities decreased by a total of CHF 0.3 billion, and this is mainly due to lower trade payables and lower contract liabilities as well as a significant decline in current tax liabilities. The net increase in provisions, that's just an additional information. The net increase in provisions for onerous contracts as a result of the Wilhelmshaven value adjustment is almost fully compensated by the use of the provisions for the decommissioning and disposal fund of the Mühleberg nuclear plant so that the amount of provisions remains stable. Equity increases by CHF 0.2 billion.
The main reasons for the strengthening of equity are, first and foremost, net operating profit of CHF 387.9 million and further, the actuarial gains from the remeasurement of defined benefit obligations, strengthened equity. The dividend distribution of CHF 215.6 million in the first half of the year is charged to equity.
As a result, the equity ratio rose further. I explained it with 2.7 percentage points, and it rises to 51.5%, which supports further growth and enables us to continue to actively shape the energy transition. Now ROCE, excluding the Wilhelmshaven value adjustment comes to 7.5% and clearly surpasses BKW's capital costs. It has remained very stable, except for the 2022 record year.
Note on the right, the net debt-to-EBITDA ratio, 0.9x, that's stable. Including partner plans, the net debt to EBITDA is 1.8x, a multiple of 1.8. Now the dividend proposal. The Board of Directors will propose to the Annual General Meeting an increase in the dividend of CHF 0.10 to CHF 3.80 per share. The requested appropriation of the available profit takes into account the long-standing dividend policy of BKW, which we also communicated and affirmed at the Capital Markets Day. It is based on the following principles: distribution of operating net profit.
As you can see here, it's defined as net profit of the group minus the tax performance of the STENFO from Mühleberg. And for 2025, the value adjustment for Wilhelmshaven was excluded because it has no impact on cash. And with the proposed dividend of CHF 3.80, the distribution ratio is at 45.2% with a dividend return of 2.3% based on the year-end share price of CHF 168.40.
With this, I would like to conclude the financial part and pass the floor back to Robert Itschner for the outlook.
Thank you very much. We've already confirmed earlier this year, we expect an EBIT in the range of CHF 650 million to CHF 750 million. When it comes to Energy Solutions, we have still quite high price volatility, which is, however, declining. The energy prices have been hedged at a higher level for 2026. We will have stable earnings in Power Grid and ongoing improvement in profitability in Infrastructure and Buildings. So we are still expecting a gratifying year for 2026.
Thank you so much, Robert and Martin, for your presentation. Now ladies and gentlemen, it is time for your questions. I think we've already received a question in the live stream. And here in this room, dear guests, we kindly ask you to wait for the microphone if you have a question, we kindly ask you to state your name and your company. Is there a question in the audience? Yes, please. First row on the right-hand side, please.
I've got a question with regard to Infrastructure and Buildings. In the past, there was an EBIT margin goal of 8%. Is that still held? Because you said it is -- it was a transition year last year. And maybe it is still a transition year this year with operating progress. So that is the first question.
And then basically, midterm goals, any goals for EBIT for 2026? I think this has been revised already. And the last question, you've also mentioned the shortage of skilled labor that this is quite a challenge. Could you maybe go into that a little bit? It's also probably new talents that you're talking about here.
Should I take this one? Well, infrastructure and buildings, yes, we uphold the 8%. We will move step by step in this direction with operating improvements mainly. So that is the plan. We said 2030, that is true, 8%. If it is earlier, of course, that would be lovely. However, we have a very solid structure in INB. We have done a great deal there. So therefore, we will come to the improvements.
Now when it comes to the shortage of skilled labor. Now honestly, the situation has been mitigated a little bit over the past 5 months. The labor market has become a little bit more difficult for people looking for a job. But we are looking for specific expertise, very skilled labor. And of course, we also invest in internal trainings. We have a new training center where we -- and we also have an academy.
And we're, of course, trying to introduce and acquire talents coming from universities. I'm not quite sure whether I got your question -- the second question acoustically. In 2026, we gave a guidance for CHF 650 million to CHF 750 million. That's for 2026 EBIT. And we also have the ambitions that's for 2030. These are ambitions that we want to reach until 2030. Of course, there is a range, and that is still upheld.
However, we have to be clear. This is not a linear development up to 2030. However, there are no corrections for these figures with the goals for 2030. Have I answered your questions?
2. Question Answer
So you do not have any revised midterm goals?
No. I mean, there were midterm goals 2022 to 2026. No. Actually, we do a guidance and then we have the Kronos figures. That's the long-term ambition that we want to attain.
Any further question?
Tommaso from UBS. You have mentioned price volatility in the market. Now you need to -- we have to be clear that these prices have become more and more volatile. What about this environment for the trading division? That's the first question. And the second question, could you say anything about the prices in the midterm, what the price -- what the prices are that you've already hedged? And then I also have a question of understanding, but I'll come later on with that.
Okay. So you mean the very current environment that you're talking about. Now this is characterized by extremely difficult developments that are not easy to predict. It is a very challenging environment really. It's very difficult to make an outlook, a forecast because there are so many events on a daily basis that we need to take into consideration. So on that note, I would not like to give you any information about these developments because we need to adapt to the situation on a daily basis. And this happens very, very quickly.
President Trump is making an announcement. Gas prices are increasing. And then an hour later, he announces that the war in Iran is almost over and then the gas prices are decreasing again. So these are very erratic developments to some extent, and it is very difficult to put that in line with our models. But we have very solid models and nothing much has changed about them. Of course, price volatility is high currently, but at the very moment, we cannot really rely on the models, but that is a very current thing.
And the second question was about the hedged prices. Now we are not really there yet. We will communicate a little bit later on. This is also due to the fact that we have become a bit more cautious of how we want to do this, but this has not yet happened. Then I have got a question with regard -- you named it opportunities. for Energy Solutions.
There was a slide with opportunities. So these are planned projects, I suppose. But what does that mean exactly? Are these specific projects where you want to maybe participate in a tender or whether it's not yet clear whether there are maybe appeals against a certain project? And what does it mean when it comes to your CapEx because you're lagging a little bit behind your midterm plan. So can you improve this significantly going forward?
Well, of course, we are observing and monitoring all kinds of opportunities. For example, in Italy, where we have also developed projects that we acquired. They are a little bit higher in terms of price. But what we see currently is that project developers in the market have now problems. And this is also an opportunity that is interesting for us to work or collaborate with these providers.
In the pipeline, we also have the giga megawatt projects, of course, that we see irrespective of the structure of what we want to acquire.
Maybe about CapEx, do not expect that we want to exceed CapEx or go wild with CapEx because we have a financial structure that we rely upon. So this has to be upheld, but there are opportunities as we understand. If this is such an opportunity is profitable, we might go forward with it. But this is an entire portfolio. When it comes to wind, there are many opportunities. We are tendering for several projects. But if it is not in line with our models, with our expectations, then we will withdraw.
Thank you so much. I think I'll take a question from the live stream from Alessandro Foletti from Octavian. 14% less terawatt hours was produced and he asks, this is probably in line with consumption because consumption is decreasing as well, not only in Switzerland, although everyone else says -- tells a different story. So can you give us an explanation for this difference?
Yes, please. Now the decline in production, this is simply, as we've explained before, the hydro and wind levels. That's due to the fact that production has declined not because we didn't want to, but it was just hydro and wind levels that led to this fact. And if we cannot sell it to direct customers, then we will sell it on the free market, for example, on the exchange market. So that happens on the daily basis. So in the short term, of course, this has an effect on the price. But basically, we sell, of course, our energy.
Let me look around in the room. Are there any further questions sitting there? Yes, on the left-hand side, Yes, please.
Simonetzinger from Rabobank. I have 2 questions. The first is on the EBIT guidance of CHF 650 million to CHF 750 million. To what extent it is supported by already like regulatory revenues hedged portfolios? And the second question is on CapEx. What about the geographic distribution, especially in Energy Solutions?
Well, first of all, just a note a remark on the regulatory issue. Now the regulator, if there are effects, they are not supporting effects. Most of the time, they are negative. They impact us. They adversely impact us. We've got hedged prices on the one hand. And in 2026, it is for the first time -- for the last time that we have a little plus of about CHF 30 million from hedged prices of 3 years ago.
And we said 2025, the hedge price was -- now it is CHF 26 to CHF 100. And in 2026, the hedge price will go down again. And CapEx for the ambition, Kronos 2030, what we said was that investment in Switzerland. So the lion's share will go to Switzerland, but the rest will go to Europe.
Thank you. Did we answer your question? Excellent. Any questions here as well? Yes, on the left-hand side, Mr. Rechberger.
Armin Resberger from Zurich Kantonalbank. You mentioned challenging regulatory environment in Europe. Now on this new graph that you presented, what exactly did you mean by that? What are you addressing? And then investment in gas-fired power plants, 2030, 450 megawatts. Can you give us a little bit more of an explanation as to where you are going to invest the gas turbine power plant and investment in hydro, plus 150 megawatts.
I do assume that this is excluding partner plants, such as, for example, KWO. So plus 150 megawatts is quite a lot. So where does it come from? What are the hydro projects that you're addressing there?
I guess Robert will answer that question.
Now regulation. Now there are different issues there. In Germany, for example, there is a debate on how to deal with the volume of connection requests for energy storage facilities. So that's a high amount, which will never be realized. Now the question is that the -- these are questions that the regulator has to answer as to how to proceed and what kind of rules apply when?
We assume that the storage facilities that we are pursuing will still benefit from the reduced fees, but that, of course, is one aspect of the profitability calculation. Then in Europe, we have discussions within the EU of the decoupling of the gas price from the electricity price. Now what does this mean and what the result of this discussion will be is something that we can hardly predict. There are different possibilities for that.
For example, certificates for free or other solutions, but these are developments which we need to observe because they will have an effect on the market. Now gas power plants, we are pursuing one project. And of course, we're also talking with other parties in the market, but TNL is one of our partners where in in Germany, we are going to take a share stake in this entity.
And there will be a tender. There will be an auction on that volume. But we haven't seen the tender documents or all the specifications and everything. But actually, this is something that should be available very soon because actually this year, 2026, this is supposed to happen.
So that's the gas power plant in Ham. It's a location where there were already 2 gas power plants at this time. Now investment in hydro, I'm wondering about the 150 megawatts. That's the pipeline, I think you were talking about, right, in that slide, yes. Yes, that's correct. This year, Grimsel 4 will be planned or take a decision on that and start the construction. That's a pump hydro power plant.
The capacity that will be turbines. So that's 2x 75 megawatts, and they only partly accounted for in this figure. But then we also have reservoir enlargement. These are elements that are in the pipeline, but of course, the payback will come later. The payback for our strategy will be -- take a while.
And Mr., he also wondered about the partner plans. And yes, in part, they are accounted for. Then let's take a look at the live stream. We have a question from battery storage. We already talked about battery storage, Mario Graf from Energate. In December 2025, BKW announced that it plans the building of 4 large battery storage facilities in Switzerland. Did I understand correctly that the investment decisions have not been taken at this point? Could you still give us an explanation on what the current status is and how these projects are supposed to be developed?
No, for the Swiss projects, we haven't taken a decision yet. These are just studies. We're analyzing the locations. And of course, we know the locations and how they are, but we're still analyzing about zoning and what the municipalities think about those projects. So this is still a planning phase. But as soon as we know that the construction of the storage facilities would be possible, then, of course, we will take a decision.
Thank you, Robert. Another question here in the room. Yes, here in the first row.
I have a question for clarification to Mr. Itschner, which relates to Mr. Tommaso's question from UBS. The electricity prices, the 3-year forward prices in Germany. And what I can see there is that over the last 5 days, for example, prices were paid between EUR 64 and EUR 86. So that was the highest level by an energy trader. Now I'm not sure what the underlying volumes are. But shouldn't it be an expectation to your traders that they are at their desks all day long to make sure that we can just level out the price at EUR 85 for the next 3 years. In the financial industry, we would know how to -- how the traders are supposed to behave.
Well, thank you very much for this advice. Now EUR 86 is a new price for me. I saw different prices yesterday, and we discussed it. And it's absolutely true. Our traders are sitting there, and they are taking care of hedging those volumes. Well, what we do is we do proxy hedges. So we hedge Swiss volume in other markets, and that makes it a little bit more complex than you would think.
But of course, exactly this is the task of what our traders are supposed to do. So we can assume that you're really trying to hedge those opportunities and that we can see those opportunities with Mr. figures. Well, of course, this is the ambition. Just like on the financial markets, it doesn't always work perfectly. But of course, we're making an effort to just hit the right moment.
And in the long end, the geopolitical disruptions haven't caused a large shift yet. Of course, you may wonder why this is the case. And the scenario is absolutely not clear yet. We don't know whether the conflict will last much longer. But yes.
And we have another question here on the right-hand side. The microphone is on its way.
Alexander Bossert from UBS. I have another question for clarification on Slide 8, the pipeline. On the right-hand side, I do assume that the figures, 150 number, CHF 1,450, that's the Swiss franc million amount of CapEx. It's not megawatts. Otherwise, it wouldn't total. No, that's megawatts actually. Yes, it is. So you're planning battery storage. And on the right-hand side, you have CHF 1 billion. How do I have to understand these figures?
We have specific projects that we're working on worth more than CHF 1 billion for 1,000 megawatts. And of those, we are about to take investment decisions in the volume of 500 megawatts if we -- that we would build immediately. And then we will think about whether the remaining 600, the 600 could be spent on other projects, whether it is a good thing to have battery volume in that amount in the portfolio or not, it shows that there is a possibility to do more if we came to an agreement with the partners that would be involved in these projects. So this is how we tried to kind of illustrate this on the slide.
And of those investment decisions planned for 2026, if all of them materialize, what is the CapEx? What is the number that you're expecting?
Well, you can assume that we invest between CHF 400 million and CHF 600 million, and that's a CapEx figure that you could also assume for 2026. Investment decisions are complex. And of course, it's always difficult to make a forecast, but you can assume this range.
And then there's a bond that will expire this year. It will be refinanced from the market, correct?
Yes, correct.
Question from Mr..
Emanuele Oggioni, Kepler Cheuvreux. I have 3 questions. The first one is on -- basically all the 3 questions on the '25 -- sorry, '26 guidance. The first one is on the generation business and the volatility embedded in the guidance, considering that you released the guidance in mid-January. So with a different -- completely different scenario of volatility of the prices.
So my question is not your bet or your outlook on the evolution of the volatility in '26 is to what extent the top and mid-range, bottom range of the guidance includes probably hopefully the lower volatility than in '25. So depending on how last this condition, this volatility market will last, how long will last. In any case, you should have a net benefit compared with the guidance. So if you can add more color on that. And this is the first question. The second is still on the guidance, but regards the embedded output of the generation business in hydro production. So after a dry year in '25, what are the embedded terawatt hour production for hydro in the range guidance still? And the third question is on the hedging. We know that the hedging level price is above or should be above CHF 100 in '26, if I remember well, compared with the previous slides presentation. And could you update on '28 hedging so far never disclosed before?
The moderator is summarizing the question. Yes, I'm happy to take this question. Your first question, you're absolutely correct. At the moment, we are faced with higher volatilities. But in the short term, also intraday ahead, the volatility volatilities were pretty high. What we didn't have in 2025 were low volatilities of the forward contracts. Now regarding the last 14 days and the effect on trade is something that I cannot tell. I can only say 2 things, tell you 2 things. I would caution you to become speculative because we have a clear guidance, which is out there and which is valid.
Now we have a feeling that over weeks and months, we would suddenly be faced with a wonderful trading result, then we would give you this information. But please be cautious. Now second, hydro. In '25, it was 3.7. For '26, we are expecting normal wind conditions that for '26, we're planning with 4.1 terawatt hours. So an increase by about 0.4, which would be the average. Now the weather, of course, is something that we can't predict. So we don't know. Now the hedge for 2028, about CHF 60.
I'd like to go to the live stream and a question that we've received there. It's asked by Rene Rückert of Baader Bank. The positive outlook for Infrastructure and Buildings, does this also include the special asset in Germany, which might lead to a higher investment? Or is this calculated without this special effect?
No. We do not have any assumptions for the special asset in Germany. The special asset in Germany would give us the opportunity to grow a little bit faster also in the years to come. However, I've also shown that, especially in engineering, we have a very high order backlog. So we are not relying on this special asset to come. But of course, it would be great for the years to come.
Thank you very much for this answer. We have 2 questions in the live stream. We have one from from Euro Energies. It is in English, and I shall read it out and then summarize it in English.
On your international growth, which countries do you want to compare and how internal growth or new acquisitions? What is your plan in France? And Mr. is summarizing the question in German.
Well, basically, our strong position in Switzerland has to be safeguarded. However, also in our core markets around Switzerland, across Europe, we want to grow, of course, but we want to have a differentiated portfolio. And this differentiated portfolio is across many countries without a special focus. However, we want to guarantee and make sure that we are well distributed in the market.
In France, we are actually quite strongly positioned with wind production, for example, but also with marketing of green electricity. And we're, of course, also active with hydro, for example, and we certainly will grow in this respect. We're working that we also will improve the market access on the sales side.
France is very interesting because the old market scheme has been abolished and the free market is now playing a greater role, which was in the past, regulated much more, which is, of course, an opportunity for us.
And we have one last question in the live stream by Peter. He asks about the value adjustment of the coal-fired power plant in Wilhelmshaven. Do you want to sell this power plant in the midterm? Or will you keep it as a reserve power plant? Have you benefited from this specific coal power plant in the year 2026 so far?
But the value adjustment, of course, is not linked to our wish to withdraw from the coal production up to 2030. We want to withdraw from coal power plant and its productions. However, there is not a true market for stakes in coal power plants. We have to make sure that this is clear. But of course, we are monitoring this, and we're trying to implement it. This year, the power plant has already been in operation, which is basically good for us. We will see what the remainder of this year will bring. We expect that as of this year and going forward that the operating hours will decline quite significantly fundamentally for us. It is that if there are crisis, supply crises like this, that it is good to have such a power plant in operation.
Thank you very much. This leads us to the end of this Q&A session. I would like to thank you very much for your interest and your questions, and thank you for the statements by Robert and Martin. Now before we conclude today's analyst and media conference on BKW's 2025 fiscal year, I would like to draw your attention to the next date in 2026.
Now on August 19, 2026, BKW will publish its half year results. The presentation of the half year results will longer take place in a hybrid format, but it will be exclusively online. And we would like to increase our visibility for the capital market between the half year and full year results. BKW will, therefore, provide information on business performance up to the third quarter for the first time in 2026.
Now this new 9 months business call -- this update business call will take place on Tuesday, November 10, 2026. On behalf of BKW, I'd like to thank you very much for your interest for our guests here today, we'll have refreshments that are available at the back of this room, and we would like to invite you to enjoy it.
We're looking forward to welcoming you again on the August 19, 2026, for the online presentation of the half year results 2026. We wish you a wonderful spring and summer, and see you then. Goodbye.
[Statements in English on this transcript were spoken by an interpreter present on the live call.]
BKW — Q4 2025 Earnings Call
BKW — Q4 2025 Earnings Call
📊 Quarter at a Glance
- Sales CHF 4.50B (-4.8% YoY)
- EBIT CHF 561m (excl Wilhelmshaven: CHF 674.6m)
- Net profit CHF 388m
- Free cash flow CHF 333m
- Equity 51.5% (+2.7pp)
🎯 What Management Says
- Growth focus Energy Solutions expanding footprint with new offices and stronger direct marketing; notable projects and pipeline (Zelestra, Sudvolt) advancing flexibility and renewables.
- Asset base robust Power Grid and Infrastructure & Buildings execution; high reliability, accelerating smart-meter rollout and efficiency gains.
- Strategic posture Solutions 2030 pipeline reinforced; selective acquisitions and project-management capabilities to boost profitability.
🔭 Outlook & Guidance
- EBIT guidance CHF 650–750m for 2026
- Hydro outlook ~4.1 TWh in 2026 (normal wind conditions)
- CapEx CHF 400–600m; Switzerland focus, with Europe opportunities
- Hedging prices still evolving; daily risk management; details to be communicated
- Dividend CHF 3.80 per share proposed
❓ Analyst Q&A
- INB margin 8% target reaffirmed; midterm goals unchanged; stepwise improvements the plan
- CapEx / growth emphasis on Swiss projects; range given; opportunistic investments considered if profitable
- Volatility / hedging market remains choppy; hedges for 2026 discussed but not fully disclosed yet
⚡ Bottom Line
2025 was a solid year despite a dry year restricting hydro/wind output. Infrastructure & Buildings profitability rose, Energy Solutions advanced its growth pipeline, and the balance sheet remained sturdy. Guidance for 2026 is reaffirmed, with a disciplined CapEx plan and a CHF 3.80 dividend. Regulatory shifts and price volatility remain key external risks.
BKW — Special Call - BKW AG
1. Management Discussion
Good morning, and welcome to today's conference call of BKW, where we are going to share further explanations regarding today's ad hoc release. My name is Sandra, I'm the Chorus Call operator. [Operator Instructions] The conference call will be recorded [Operator Instructions]. The conference cannot be recorded for publication, it is prohibited.
Let me hand the floor to Robert Itschner, the CEO of BKW.
Good morning, and welcome to today's analyst and media call. Thank you very much for taking the time to join us at such short notice to accompany us through this ad hoc meeting.
We would like to start by explaining the ad hoc announcements, and we'll certainly be available for any questions that you may have.
Now what are the main messages for our media call? BKW expects the Wilhelmshaven coal power plant to generate less electricity in the future. Combined with decreasing volatilities in electricity prices, revenues from the operation of the power plant are expected to decline accordingly. This results in a value adjustment of around CHF 110 million on BKW's stake in the Wilhelmshaven coal power plant. The power plant has thus been fully impaired.
To expand flexible energy production, BKW together with partners is planning to build an H2-ready gas power plant in Germany. Now what do those decisions have in terms of an impact? Well, BKW expects operating results of CHF 650 million to CHF 670 million for 2025 following the impairment on the Wilhelmshaven power plant, the new EBIT guidance for 2025 is CHF 540 million to CHF 560 million. For 2026, BKW expects earnings with an EBIT guidance range of CHF 650 million to CHF 750 million.
Now in the following, I'm happy to talk about some further details, the value adjustment Wilhelmshaven. With its Solutions 2030 strategy, BKW communicated ambitious sustainability goals in the areas of climate, energy, nature and people on November 8, 2024. It set itself the goal of halving its Scope 1 and 2 CO2 intensity by 2030 compared with 2022. In addition, BKW is aiming for Net Zero emissions in Scope 1 and 2 across the entire group by 2040. We naturally remain committed to these goals. We have previously communicated that we're considering an accelerated phaseout of coal. This still applies. However, it is also important to clarify that the power plant remains in operation. The value adjustment is not related to an ongoing sales process or a decision to decommission the power plant.
How does the gas project in Germany fit our strategy? Well, with its Solutions 2030 strategy, BKW also announced in 2024 that it intends to switch from coal-fired power plants to hydrogen-enabled gas power plants. This will significantly reduce CO2 emissions compared to today and enable BKW to meet its stated sustainability targets. As part of this transformation of our production portfolio, we're planning to build an H2-ready gas power plant in Germany. BKW and the Municipal Utility Corporation, Trianel have founded a joint project company. This company is currently making all the necessary preparations to participate in a tender by the German government for hydrogen capable power plants within the framework of the German Federal law on securing supply power, amortization of existing power plants. We're aiming for a 40% stake in this power plant.
A decision on investment in the construction of an H2-ready gas power plant has not yet been made. This will only be possible within the framework of the aforementioned tender. In addition, there are plans in the medium term to operate these gas-fired power plants with renewable hydrogen, which will further reduce CO2 emissions. BKW is therefore sticking to its communicated sustainability targets.
I would now like to hand over to CFO, Martin Zwyssig, who will explain how the effects are likely to impact EBIT in 2025.
Good morning. Thank you. I'm happy to explain how we arrived at the revised EBIT guidance communicated today for 2025. The starting point for the guidance is, as always, the budget, which roughly aligns with the midpoint of the range that we communicated. It is at about CHF 700 million for 2025.
Starting from there, 2025 faced us with negative quantity effects in hydropower and wind, which caused a negative deviation of approximately CHF 40 million. There were further influences, which, however, offset each other. In addition, we recognized a value adjustment of roughly CHF 110 million for the Wilhelmshaven coal power plant as a one-off effect. This leads to a revised midpoint guidance of CHF 550 million. And we can narrow the range to plus/minus CHF 10 million, which results in a revised EBIT guidance of CHF 540 million to CHF 560 million for the year 2025. This means that BKW can expect a good operating result of CHF 650 million to CHF 670 million before the value adjustment for Wilhelmshaven, which is, in fact, in the range of the original guidance of CHF 650 million and CHF 750 million. The amount may still vary by a few million francs. We will not be able to communicate the final amount until the annual financial statements are issued.
The value adjustment is done by increasing the existing provision for onerous contracts and will therefore have an impact on EBITDA. It will, however, not affect cash. The amount of the provision will be recognized as energy procurement costs. This means the value adjustment of Wilhelmshaven power plant is then recognized in full. The increase in the provision will contribute towards a reduction in future valuation risks.
What is important for you, an exchange rate loss from the valuation of the euro investment continues to be recognized in equity. Upon a disposal, this effect in the amount of, at present, approximately CHF 120 million would be recognized in profit and loss and thus negatively impact earnings. This is also called recycling of ForEx attacks. It has no adverse effect on equity because it is already recognized there, and it doesn't adversely affect cash either. The final amount depends on the euro-Swiss franc exchange rate at the time of the transaction. We are happy to present the results -- the details of our financial results as usual at the annual conference on 11th March of 2026.
I will now hand back to Robert for the outlook for the year ahead of us.
Thank you, Martin. In the top media release this morning, we also announced EBIT guidance for 2026 in the range of CHF 650 million to CHF 750 million. This is to give you an idea of how we assess the current year and in order to shed light on that, some facts on the divisions.
With Energy Solutions, the forward price volatility is lower than last year. Accordingly, we expect a decline in earnings from forward price trading in asset-backed trading. Spot price volatility, on the other hand, remains high, driven by the expansion of PV. Accordingly, we expect earnings from flexibility optimization and system services to remain high. For the production year 2026, we expect to return to the long-term average in terms of volume.
Power Grid. We do not expect the reduction in the regulated weighted average cost of capital for the grids to have a negative effect in 2026 due to existing coverage differences. Minimum remuneration for solar power fed into the grid and the reduction in basic electricity tariffs will have a negative impact on earnings in 2026.
Infrastructure and Buildings. We expect a slight improvement in the EBIT margin again in 2026.
Summary. We, therefore, expect EBIT of between CHF 650 million to CHF 750 million for 2026.
And I would now like to hand back to Martin.
Thank you, Robert. The starting point is again the budget for the guidance and as mentioned, is at the mid of the range. And compared to 2025, there will be higher hedged prices, a normalization of quantity effect for hydropower and wind to the level of originally planned for 2025 as well as increased earnings from the Infrastructure and Buildings segment. And all this will contribute to an EBIT increase compared to 2025 of around CHF 90 million.
On the other hand, we are anticipating a decline in results from trading to a lower forward price volatility in 2026. And this negative effect will be around CHF 40 million, together with a decrease in power tariffs in basic supply and the minimum remuneration for photovoltaic feed-in and that amounts to CHF 10 million, and this leads us to an EBIT of some CHF 700 million. And as usual, we apply a range of plus/minus CHF 50 million to the midpoint of the guidance to account for volatility. The EBIT guidance for 2026 that comes to CHF 650 million to CHF 750 million, and it is at the same level as the original guidance for 2025.
So, much from us, and we are now happy to take your questions.
We will now start the question and answer session. [Operator Instructions] The first question comes from [ Sonia Singh from AWP ].
2. Question Answer
I have three questions, if I may. Are you looking into divesting the stake in Wilhelmshaven? Is it excluded that there are other impairments on that plant?
And on Hamm, the following question. Could you repeat perhaps, please, what you expect? When would you commission the plant in Hamm?
First of all, whether we have to expect further value adjustments or not? Actually, this won't happen because the adjustment of CHF 110 million means that the power plant is fully written off. So, regarding the divestment, at the moment, no divestment process or sale process is ongoing. And we said that the value adjustment is in no way linked to any intention to sell. However, in the framework of the strategy Solutions 2030, we have been looking into a phaseout of coal-fired energy. And then the gas project, in the early '30s, this is a project that will be -- will come into operation.
The next question comes from [ Jürgen Maier ] from [indiscernible]
I also have three questions, if I may. First, could you perhaps paint the larger picture. On the one hand, there's more volatility in the spot market. On the other hand, there's less production in coal power plants. How does that fit together, particularly also in times when there's little wind?
Second question, where does the hydrogen come from? In Germany, there's a huge discussion on hydrogen because a lot of projects are not being realized. Where does the hydrogen come from? And when will you begin to see hydrogen?
Third, there were discussions about gaps in the energy supply in Switzerland. Would that not be an issue that BKW should be doing more in terms of there of that?
Thank you for the questions. Larger picture volatility vis-a-vis production in the coal plant, Wilhelmshaven. Well, adding more capacities was a thing. We see volatility, obviously, in the daily changes, but a coal plant needs some time to get started. Hence, this is not the ideal technology to bring about short-term changes in the grid. There's no compensation effect there at short term. Hence, we are of the opinion that there are fewer operating hours in the coal plant, Wilhelmshaven.
Hydrogen then. Well, yes, there's quite a discussion around H2. There initially was quite a hype two or three years ago on hydrogen. And now in the meantime, it's become clear that this is not quite that easy. We'll have to see how fast the hydrogen market will develop the market on hydrogen. We have a problem that there is no market. There are a few people that would justify investments. There are few -- there's little demand. Hence, there will need to be subsidies on the production of hydrogen. This will happen sooner or later as we see it. But of course, I cannot tell you when, what quantities of hydrogen will be generated. And hence, when we will be able to switch the gas plant to hydrogen, we still think that the fuel switch from gas to hydrogen in Germany makes a lot of sense. Gas-powered stations are -- have about 40% of the CO2 emissions of a coal plant. It's considerably less. Hence, it's a suitable technology for a transition when we need to compensate for these volatilities.
Your last question, gaps in the supply that were commented by VSE. Of course, there are certain fears that we are too slow in Switzerland to take the measures that we all decided on. Part of that is the expansion of capacities in hydropower. Wind farms were initially also part of the plans that were communicated by the federal institutions. I do share the concerns. I also think we need to move ahead to realize those projects in Switzerland, but I do not see an immediate risk of gaps in the supply currently unless things were to change dramatically.
Next question comes from Tommaso Operto from UBS.
A follow-up question on the gas plant. Do you have an estimate around the installed capacities there? And you talked about the early 30s. This is not part of your midterm planning of 4.7 gigawatt installed capacities until 2030. Could you provide us with an update here? Is there potentially a shift of this goal given the fact that you will have to realize certain investments that have not been realized yet?
On the first issue here about capacities in Germany. The federal government talked about 20 gigawatts installed capacities. in the first tender, it's going to be less, considerably less in the first step, of course. But those are the scales that are provided for by the government in Germany that it needs in order to make sure that there's stability in the German grid.
On the capacity of our project, we cannot say anything about that because we are involved in a competitive tender. And therefore, we would not like to make any communication on this.
The next question comes from [ Kristian Schneider from Martell ]
I also have a question on the decline in annual production. You said that less will be produced in Wilhelmshaven. Could you quantify that, please? Could you give us an order of scale perhaps?
We cannot say that exactly because that is not information we generally communicate. But what we can say is that numbers of operating hours already last year declined massively. So, there's this trend. We certainly generated certain revenue because we hedged coal and we're able to produce profit, but that's over. Hence, the power plant needs to be produced black figure, and we see the greatly reduced operating hours.
Next question from [ Mario Graf from energate messenger Schweiz ].
I hope you can hear me. I also have three questions. First question about capacities of the gas power plant that is planned. You said you cannot put a figure to it. Could you at least give a scale of magnitude?
Second question also around the planned gas power plant. Could you also hear talk about numbers, how much does BKW want to invest?
Last question, in the connection of the German strategy on power plants in Germany, more capacities are planned for in Germany. Is it possible that the two instruments in Germany will lead to a fact where BKW will invest also in other projects in Germany. Is that conceivable?
On the first question, the magnitude of scales of capacity, it's going to be a sizable power plant. I can say so much, but we don't want to talk in terms of gigawatts or megawatts in terms of capacities. On the magnitude of scale and investments, well, we're doing these calculations now and we have values from existing gas plants. But obviously, we're in the midst of the process. Hence, we do not want to communicate any further details. On the market generally on the markets around capacities, whether we will be further investing, we don't know yet. We'll see.
In the strategy, we basically said that such participations are in the books to a certain extent with the project Hamm. We see a good possibility to realize that if that was not to work for any reason. Of course, we'll be looking out for alternatives. But we need to take note of the fact that the interest in the tender is great in Germany. So we're not the sole provider. Other organizations will also offer and hence, projects where BKW will be able to participate are not numerous. But of course, we want to implement our strategy and hence, we'll also position ourselves.
We have an additional question from [ Yasmine from INVasset ].
Yes. It's me again. I'm going to reduce my number of vessels to two. The investment in Wilhelmshaven used to be criticized. Would you regard it as a mistake?
And then a second question on gas-fired power plants. There's a tender ongoing in Switzerland as well. Any comments on that? And what is the role of gas for the future in Switzerland?
The first question was that it was a bad investment decision back then. The difficult to assess today because this is a power plant we operated over a long period of time, and we earned good money with it in times of the energy crisis, particularly. So, state today, we will no longer invest in coal. It's a basic principle because we want to stick to our sustainability goals, but I'd be cautious to say that this was a bad investment decision.
Gas power in Switzerland is being discussed as reserve power plants. Operators would have to bring the investment, build the plant and then be paid by the federal state for its operation according to the orders made on when production is to start. This is a very different business case from the one in Germany, where we have a tender where you commit to a price for the power plant, but then operate the plant under market conditions, which is much more interesting in terms of an investment than just have a reserve gas power plant that you keep in the portfolio somewhere.
Can this change in Switzerland? That's a good question. Lots of discussions around that. What is going to be necessary in the long term? Do we need large power plants and what sort of plants will we need? The discussion has been launched also with the blackout initiative. We'll see what the process will be and the consensus will be in Switzerland in the next years.
We are now going to take the last question from the German conference call. That's [ Armin Hochberger from VRG Capital Bank ].
Well, actually, this is a little bit new territory, these H2-ready gas power plants. I have a technical question. Are there gas turbines on the market available already, so standardized gas turbines that can process H2?
Yes, they do exist, and we work together with one of the largest gas turbine producers worldwide. It's a large German company, by the way. I'm not a gas turbine specialist, however, but it is true that there are very few changes that will have to be made on the turbine itself, nothing on the turbine actually. It's just the back system that feeds the gas into the turbine that will need to be refurbished to be operational for H2.
Technically, it seems to be not a problem. The largest issue, however, is the production of H2, it's transport over longer distances. Those logistics will have to be built up for H2-enabled operations.
We're going to take a question from the English conference, and we have Laura Bucher from Octavian AG.
Just two questions from my side. First, are there any other assets that currently where a similar reassessment of the energy market volatility and utilization could lead to further impairments?
And then the second one on the 2025 EBIT, is the delta between your expected number for '25 on an adjusted basis and the midrange of the guidance, which was CHF 700 million, is it due to even lower volatility versus previous expectations? And thus, we should assume that the EBIT in the other two, two other divisions are within the guidance? Or is there something one-off there as well?
I may read the last question first. It was a pure quantity effect from the CHF 700 million. It was mainly hydropower, but also wind. This has nothing to do with volatility, this deviation. And then your question regarding whether similar value adjustments might happen or whether they are being assessed.
So, my first comment is that all our assets are being subjected to the impairment test once a year. No, we are not assuming that this magnitude of value adjustments would have to happen again.
Maybe one additional comment. The value adjustments for 2025 are done. These are all the value adjustments that will be performed.
Next question from Emanuele Oggioni from Kepler.
If I understood well, you mentioned in for '26 outlook, a CHF 50 million decline year-on-year from trading now due to lower price volatility. So, this is one of the negative moving parts year-on-year for '26. Could you detail also the moving parts on regulated networks in '26 and also onwards because you mentioned -- so first of all, the year-on-year deviation '26 compared to '25. But also you mentioned in the press release that the profitability in regulated networks will be affected also not only in '26, but also in the coming years. So if you provide also add more color on the coming years.
Well, the guidance is always for the following year. Just a small correction. You mentioned CHF 50 million in terms of volatility and price effects, it's CHF 40 million. And coming back to your question, the effect due to the reduction of power tariffs, and the feed-in, the minimum remuneration for feed-in of photovoltaic effects. Those two effects together for 2026 add up to CHF 10 million.
The effect from WACC from grid, so that's the basic supply. The effect -- the regulatory effect from reducing the grid WACC in 2026 will not have an effect, although it is already effective because this goes at the expense of price differences. You have the coverage differences, recovery differences that you either build or consume and the negative WACC effects will be consumed. That will have a negative effect in 2027. And this will lead up to another probably CHF 10 million then for 2027, though.
And one additional comment, the WACC, W-A-C-C, for the grid is being defined on a yearly basis. For 2027, we have an internal evaluation of it, but the actual number will only be confirmed during 2026.
We're going to take the last question from [ Rolf Renders from AMG Analysen & Anlagen AG ]
Can you please update your dividend policy or refresh it?
I'm happy to do that. Our dividend policy has 2 effects. On the one hand, 35% to 50% of the operating net profit. And the other component is the stable dividend policy that we aspire. So, not a reduction of distributed dividends. So that's our dividend policy, which is in place. And it won't be influenced by this value adjustment.
Ladies and gentlemen, that was the last question. And I would like to hand back the floor to Robert Itschner for his concluding words.
Thank you again for participating also in the discussion, and thank you for your interest in BKW. Wish you all a great day, and I'm very much looking forward to seeing you again at our balance press meeting. Bye, bye.
Ladies and gentlemen, this is the end of the conference call. We'd like to thank you for your attendance. Bye, bye.
[Statements in English on this transcript were Spoken by an interpreter present on the live call.]
Financial data from BKW
Revenue
Revenue is the sum of all sales generated by a company, e.g. for its products or services.
Revenue (TTM) metric explainedDirect Costs
Direct costs are the costs incurred directly in connection with the manufacture of the product or service.
Gross Profit
Gross Profit indicates how much of the revenue remains in the company after deducting direct production costs. If the percentage share of sales is calculated, this is referred to as the gross margin.
Gross Profit metric explainedSelling and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) include all expenses for marketing and sales as well as the general administration of the company.
Research and Development Expense
Research and development costs (R&D) provide information on how much the company invests in the research and development of its products. The costs are particularly interesting as a percentage of revenue and in comparison to direct competitors.
EBITDA
EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization) is the company's earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. The EBITDA margin is calculated as a percentage of sales.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation represents reductions in the value of the company's assets (e.g. due to wear and tear on machinery).
EBIT (Operating Income)
EBIT (Earnings Before Interest and Taxes) is the company's profit before interest and taxes, also known as the operating income. The EBIT Margin is calculated as a percentage of sales at
.
Net Profit
Net Profit represents the profit or loss after deduction of all costs.
Net Profit metric explainedStocksGuide Premium
| Jun '26 |
+/-
%
|
||
| Revenue | 4,220 4,220 |
5%
5%
100%
|
|
| - Direct Costs | 2,080 2,080 |
5%
5%
49%
|
|
| Gross Profit | 2,141 2,141 |
5%
5%
51%
|
|
| - Selling and Administrative Expenses | 1,214 1,214 |
4%
4%
29%
|
|
| - Research and Development Expense | - - |
-
-
|
|
| EBITDA | 768 768 |
17%
17%
18%
|
|
| - Depreciation and Amortization | 301 301 |
2%
2%
7%
|
|
| EBIT (Operating Income) EBIT | 467 467 |
24%
24%
11%
|
|
| Net Profit | 372 372 |
19%
19%
9%
|
|
In millions CHF.
Don't miss a Thing! We will send you all news about BKW directly to your mailbox free of charge.
If you wish, we will send you an e-mail every morning with news on stocks of your portfolios.
BKW Stock News
Company Profile
BKW AG engages in the production and sale of electricity, transmission of electricity and related engineering services. It operates through the following segments: Energy, Grid, Services, and Other. The Energy segment focuses on generation and sale of electricity to its end consumers, distribution partners, and on the wholesale market, while it also supplies energy for the production of heat. The Grid segment encompasses all grid related activities and generates income through grid usage fees. The Services segment provides engineering planning and consulting services for energy, infrastructure, and environmental projects; integrated services in the area of building technology; as well as the construction, servicing, and maintenance of energy, telecommunication, transport, and water networks. The Other segment focuses in the activities that are centrally managed within the Group; these largely consist of Group financing, real estate, fleet management, procurement, financial assets and tax. The company was founded in 1898 and is headquartered in Bern, Switzerland.
StocksGuide Premium
| Head office | Switzerland |
| CEO | Mr. Itschner |
| Employees | 11,351 |
| Founded | 1898 |
| Website | www.bkw.ch |


