Brink's Company Stock price
Is Brink's Company a Top Scorer Stock based on the Dividend, High-Growth-Investing or Leverman Strategy?
As a Free StocksGuide user, you can view scores for all 9,134 stocks worldwide.
StocksGuide Premium
StocksGuide Unlimited
Key metrics
📘 Market Capitalization
📈 What is it?
Market capitalization shows how much a company is currently worth on the stock market.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It helps classify companies by size (Large, Mid, Small Cap) and indicates their market presence and relative stability.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Large-cap companies tend to be more stable, often pay dividends, but may grow more slowly.
- Smaller firms may offer higher growth potential but come with more volatility.
- Market capitalization is a useful indicator of company size — but not a measure of whether a stock is undervalued or overvalued.
📘 Enterprise Value (EV)
📈 What is it?
Enterprise Value represents the total cost to acquire a company — including its debt and excluding its cash reserves.
🧮 How is it calculated?
(= Market Cap + Net Debt)
🏛️ Why is it important?
EV gives a more complete picture of a company's value than market cap alone and is used in key valuation ratios like EV/FCF or EV/Sales.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Enterprise Value shows the true cost of buying a company, including all financial obligations.
- It is more accurate than just looking at market cap, especially when comparing companies with different levels of debt or cash.
- Professional investors prefer EV-based multiples because they better reflect the company’s full financial footprint.
📘 Net Debt
📈 What is it?
Net Debt shows how much debt remains after subtracting a company’s available cash reserves.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It indicates how dependent a company is on borrowed money and how easily it can service its debt in the short term.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Low or negative net debt signals financial strength and flexibility.
- Companies with strong cash positions are better positioned in crises.
- High net debt increases financial risk — especially in environments with rising interest rates or economic downturns.
📘 Cash
📈 What is it?
Cash represents all liquid assets a company can access immediately — including cash, bank deposits, and short-term investments.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It reflects a company’s financial flexibility and resilience — enabling investments, buybacks, or buffer in downturns.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A strong cash position means greater room for maneuver and crisis resistance.
- Cash-rich companies can invest, pay down debt, or repurchase shares.
- But excess idle cash might indicate a lack of growth opportunities.
📘 Shares Outstanding
📈 What is it?
Shares outstanding represent the total number of a company’s shares currently held by investors — excluding treasury stock.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It’s the basis for key metrics like Earnings Per Share (EPS), Market Capitalization, or the Price/Earnings ratio (P/E).
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Fewer shares in circulation typically increase earnings per share — making each share more valuable.
- Share buybacks reduce the number of shares and boost per-share metrics.
- Issuing new shares does the opposite — diluting shareholder value and lowering per-share figures.
📘 Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E)
📈 What is it?
The P/E ratio shows how many times a company's earnings per share are reflected in its current share price — in other words, how "expensive" the stock appears relative to its profits.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
The P/E ratio is one of the most widely used valuation metrics. It helps investors assess whether a stock appears cheap or expensive compared to its earnings power.
🧮 Calculation
📊 P/E (TTM) = Based on earnings from the last 12 months (Trailing Twelve Months):🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low P/E may indicate undervaluation — or signal underlying issues.
- A high P/E may reflect strong growth expectations — or an overvalued stock.
📘 Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S)
📈 What is it?
The P/S ratio shows how much investors are paying for $1 of the company’s revenue – regardless of profitability.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
P/S is especially useful for evaluating growth companies or businesses not yet profitable. It reflects how the market values the company’s sales.
🧮 Calculation
Market Cap = $4.39b | Revenue (TTM) = $5.48b
Market Cap = $4.39b | Estimated Revenue = $5.64b
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low P/S may indicate undervaluation — or low profitability.
- A high P/S can reflect strong growth expectations — or excessive optimism.
- Especially helpful when evaluating companies where profits are low, volatile, or negative.
📘 Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales)
📈 What is it?
EV/Sales shows how much investors are paying for $1 of revenue — considering not just equity, but also debt and cash. It’s the capital structure–adjusted version of the P/S ratio.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It’s ideal for comparing companies with different levels of debt. It reflects a company's true cost relative to its revenue.
🧮 Calculation
Enterprise Value = $6.97b | Revenue (TTM) = $5.48b
Enterprise Value = $6.97b | Forward Revenue = $5.64b
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- EV/Sales allows for capital structure–neutral company comparisons.
- A lower ratio may indicate undervaluation; a higher one may signal strong growth expectations or overvaluation.
- Especially helpful when evaluating high-growth companies with low or negative earnings.
📘 Enterprise Value to Free Cash Flow (EV/FCF)
📈 What is it?
EV/FCF shows how many years it would take for a company to "pay back" its enterprise value using its free cash flow.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It focuses on real cash generation, ignoring accounting noise — ideal for assessing profitability and value based on liquidity, not earnings.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low EV/FCF may signal undervaluation and strong cash generation.
- A high EV/FCF might reflect weak recent cash flow or aggressive growth expectations.
- Best suited for stable, mature businesses with predictable free cash flows.
📘 Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B)
📈 What is it?
The P/B ratio compares a company’s market value to its book value — showing how much investors are paying for each dollar of net assets.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
P/B is commonly used for asset-heavy industries like banks or industrials. It helps assess whether a stock is trading above or below its net asset value.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A P/B below 1 may signal undervaluation — or weak profitability.
- A P/B above 1 implies the market expects future value creation (e.g., brand, IP, growth).
- Best used for companies with tangible assets and strong balance sheets.
📘 Dividend per Share (DPS)
📈 What is it?
Dividend per Share shows how much cash a company pays out to shareholders for each share they own – usually on an annual or quarterly basis.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
DPS is the absolute value of the payout per share – crucial for income-focused investors and dividend strategies.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A stable or growing DPS often signals a strong, shareholder-friendly business.
- DPS alone doesn’t tell you how attractive the payout is – the stock price also matters (→ see Dividend Yield).
- Long-term dividend growth is often a hallmark of high-quality companies – like the dividend aristocrats.
📘 Dividend Yield
📈 What is it?
Dividend yield shows how large a company’s dividend is in relation to its current share price.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It allows investors to compare dividend payouts across stocks, regardless of price or payout size.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A stable yield can reflect reliable distributions.
- Comparing 1Y and 5Y yield shows whether dividend growth keeps pace with stock price appreciation.
- A low yield isn’t always negative – it can signal strong past performance or growth focus.
📘 Dividend Growth
📈 What is it?
Dividend growth shows how much a company has increased its dividend per share over time.
🧮 How is it calculated?
5Y: Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR)
🏛️ Why is it important?
Consistently rising dividends are often a sign of financial strength and shareholder orientation – especially relevant for long-term investors.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Stable dividend growth is a sign of sustainable earning power.
- High dividend growth can significantly boost your total return:
- If a company pays $1 in dividends and increases it by 15% annually over 5 years, you’ll receive $2 per share in year 5 – twice as much as at the start!
📘 Payout Ratio
📈 What is it?
The payout ratio shows what percentage of a company’s earnings (per share) is distributed to shareholders as dividends.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It helps assess whether the dividend is sustainable – especially in relation to the company’s profitability.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low payout ratio means the company retains more earnings for reinvestment – typical for growth companies.
- A moderate payout (e.g. 25–50%) indicates a healthy balance between returns and reinvestment.
- High payout ratios may seem attractive but can carry risk if earnings decline.
📘 Consecutive Dividend Increases
📈 What is it?
This metric shows how many consecutive years a company has raised its dividend per share – without any cuts or pauses.
🧮 How is it calculated?
(Special dividends are not considered.)
🏛️ Why is it important?
A long track record of increases reflects financial strength, consistency, and shareholder commitment.
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A long dividend increase streak builds confidence – especially in volatile markets.
- Such companies are seen as reliable and income-friendly investments.
- The longer the streak, the stronger the company’s dividend discipline.
📘 Revenue
📈 What is it?
Revenue shows how much a company earns in total from selling its products and services – the gross income before any costs are deducted.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Revenue is one of the key figures to assess a company’s size, market position, and growth potential.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Growing revenue indicates rising demand and can be an early signal of future earnings growth.
- Comparing actual and expected revenue reveals trends in the market environment and analyst sentiment.
- Note: Strong revenue alone isn’t enough – margins and profitability matter just as much.
📘 EBITDA
📈 What is it?
EBITDA stands for “Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization.” It reflects a company’s operating profit before the effects of financing, taxes, and accounting depreciation.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
EBITDA is widely used to evaluate a company’s operating performance – especially across capital-intensive sectors or international comparisons.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high or growing EBITDA indicates strong operational profitability – independent of taxes, interest, or accounting methods.
- It’s especially useful for comparing companies across sectors or geographies.
- Important: EBITDA is not a net income figure – it excludes key costs like depreciation and interest.
📘 EBIT
📈 What is it?
EBIT stands for “Earnings Before Interest and Taxes.” It reflects a company’s operating profit after depreciation, but before interest and tax expenses.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
EBIT is a core profitability metric that shows how well the company performs in its main business operations – independent of capital structure and tax environment.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high EBIT indicates strong profitability from the company’s core business – before financial and tax effects.
- It allows better comparison between companies with different debt levels or tax structures.
- Compared to EBITDA, EBIT already accounts for depreciation and reflects capital intensity more clearly.
📘 Net Income
📈 What is it?
Net income is the company’s total profit – the amount left after all expenses, taxes, interest, and depreciation have been deducted.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Net income is the most comprehensive measure of a company’s profitability – showing how much actual profit remains after all business and financing costs.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Growing net income indicates that the company is managing all of its costs efficiently.
- It directly influences valuation metrics like P/E ratio and the company’s dividend capacity.
- Over time, net income trends reveal how resilient and profitable the business model really is.
📘 Free Cash Flow (FCF)
📈 What is it?
Free Cash Flow shows how much actual cash remains after a company covers its operating expenses and capital expenditures.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
FCF reflects a company’s real financial strength – regardless of accounting profits. It shows how much flexibility a company has for dividends, share buybacks, or debt reduction.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- High free cash flow means the company generates real, usable cash – independent of reported net income.
- It’s often the most reliable base for sustainable dividends and buybacks.
- Declining FCF can be an early warning sign – even when profits appear stable.
📘 Revenue Growth
📈 What is it?
Revenue growth shows how much a company’s sales have changed compared to the previous year – both on a trailing basis (TTM) and based on forward projections.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Forward = (Expected revenue ÷ Revenue in prior year − 1) × 100
Forward growth is based on analyst estimates for the current fiscal year.
🏛️ Why is it important?
Rising revenue signals growing demand, business expansion, and market share gains – especially important for growth-oriented companies.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Growth is the engine of long-term value creation – especially in tech and growth sectors.
- What matters is not just current growth, but its sustainability.
- Forward projections reflect whether analysts expect continued momentum – or a slowdown.
📘 EBITDA Growth
📈 What is it?
EBITDA growth shows how much a company’s operating profit (before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) has increased or decreased compared to the previous year.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Forward = (Expected EBITDA ÷ EBITDA from prior year − 1) × 100
The forward estimate is based on analyst projections for the current fiscal year.
🏛️ Why is it important?
Growing EBITDA indicates improving operational profitability – regardless of financing or accounting effects.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Strong EBITDA growth signals operational efficiency and scalability – especially during growth phases.
- EBITDA growth can be an early indicator of margin and earnings expansion – but should be assessed alongside revenue and EBIT.
📘 EBIT Growth
📈 What is it?
EBIT growth shows how much a company’s operating profit (after depreciation, but before interest and taxes) has increased compared to the previous year.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Forward = (Expected EBIT ÷ EBIT from prior year − 1) × 100
The forward estimate is based on analyst projections for the current fiscal year.
🏛️ Why is it important?
EBIT growth is a direct indicator of a company’s business performance – taking into account capital intensity through depreciation.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Rising EBIT signals improving operating profitability – even after accounting for depreciation.
- It’s especially important for evaluating companies with significant capital expenditures.
- Combined with revenue and EBITDA growth, EBIT growth provides a well-rounded view of operational progress.
📘 Net Income Growth
📈 What is it?
Net income growth shows how much a company’s bottom-line profit has increased or decreased compared to the previous year – both on a trailing basis (TTM) and based on analyst projections.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Forward = (Expected net income ÷ Net income from prior year − 1) × 100
The forward estimate reflects analysts’ expectations for the current fiscal year.
🏛️ Why is it important?
Net income is the ultimate measure of profitability. Growing net income signals stronger efficiency, cost control, and sustainable earnings power.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Stronger net income boosts valuation, dividend potential, and investor confidence.
- If profits stall while revenue grows, it may signal margin pressure.
📘 Free Cash Flow Growth
📈 What is it?
Free cash flow (FCF) growth shows how a company’s available cash – after covering operating expenses and capital expenditures – has changed compared to the previous year.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Free cash flow reflects real financial strength. Growing FCF indicates more flexibility for dividends, share buybacks, and reinvestment.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Declining FCF may point to rising investments, increasing costs, or weaker operating performance.
- Especially for dividend investors, FCF growth is critical – since dividends are paid from actual available cash.
- A negative trend isn't always bad, but it deserves closer attention.
📘 Gross Margin
📈 What is it?
Gross margin shows how much of a company’s revenue remains after deducting the direct costs of goods sold (like materials and production). It represents the company’s “raw profit” before fixed costs, taxes, and interest.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Or simply: Gross Margin = Gross Profit ÷ Revenue × 100
🏛️ Why is it important?
Gross margin indicates how efficiently a company can produce or procure what it sells. It is a key measure of product-level profitability and pricing power.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high gross margin suggests strong pricing power and efficient production.
- Falling margins may signal rising input costs or competitive pressure.
- Compared to peers, gross margin offers insights into the quality of a business model.
📘 EBITDA Margin
📈 What is it?
The EBITDA margin shows how much of a company’s revenue remains as operating profit before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization.It reflects operating efficiency without being distorted by financing or accounting factors.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
The EBITDA margin reveals how much operating income a company generates per dollar of revenue – independent of capital structure and tax effects.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high EBITDA margin reflects strong core profitability – before accounting distortions.
- It allows for effective comparisons across companies and sectors.
- A stable or growing margin signals efficient cost control and business scalability.
📘 EBIT Margin
📈 What is it?
The EBIT margin shows what percentage of revenue remains as operating profit after depreciation but before interest and taxes.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
The EBIT margin reflects a company’s core profitability while accounting for capital intensity (e.g. machinery, infrastructure). It’s especially useful for comparing businesses with different levels of depreciation.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high EBIT margin shows that the company remains efficient even after factoring in depreciation.
- It’s especially relevant for capital-intensive industries.
- Stable or rising EBIT margins over time are a strong indicator of pricing power and business quality.
📘 Net margin
📈 What is it?
Net margin shows how much of a company’s revenue remains as bottom-line profit after deducting all costs, interest, taxes, and depreciation.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Net margin reflects a company’s overall efficiency – across operations, financing, and taxation. It shows how much actual profit is generated from each dollar of revenue.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high net margin means the company is not only strong operationally but also manages financing and taxes efficiently.
- Peer comparisons reveal business quality and competitiveness.
- Declining margins despite revenue growth can be a red flag for rising costs or inefficiencies.
📘 Free cash flow margin
📈 What is it?
The free cash flow (FCF) margin shows how much of a company’s revenue remains as actual free cash after covering all operating expenses and capital expenditures.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
This margin reflects the true liquidity generated by the business – independent of accounting rules or depreciation. It’s especially relevant for dividends, buybacks, and reinvestment decisions.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high FCF margin means a company consistently generates strong cash flow.
- It’s a positive signal for financial stability and shareholder returns.
- The long-term trend is key – a declining margin may indicate rising investments or weakening operating efficiency.
📘 Equity Ratio
📈 What is it?
The equity ratio indicates what portion of a company’s total assets is financed by shareholders’ equity – in other words, how much it relies on its own capital.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
A high equity ratio reflects financial strength and stability, especially during downturns. It’s a key indicator of a company’s solvency and long-term risk profile.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Companies with high equity ratios are generally more resilient and less dependent on external debt.
- Low equity ratios can signal higher risk or aggressive financial strategies.
- Important: Always assess the equity ratio in combination with the return on equity (ROE). This shows not just how stable the company is – but also how efficiently it uses shareholder capital.
📘 Return on Equity (ROE)
📈 What is it?
Return on equity (ROE) shows how efficiently a company uses its shareholders’ equity to generate profit. In other words: how much net income is earned per dollar of equity.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
ROE is a core profitability metric. It helps investors understand whether a company delivers attractive returns on the capital provided by its shareholders.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high ROE indicates that the company is using its capital efficiently and profitably.
- It’s especially meaningful for capital-intensive businesses or firms with high equity bases.
- Important: A very high ROE can also result from high debt levels – always interpret it alongside the equity ratio to assess financial health.
📘 Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
📈 What is it?
ROCE measures how efficiently a company generates profits from its total capital – including both equity and interest-bearing debt.
🧮 How is it calculated?
It evaluates the return on all capital employed, regardless of how it’s financed.
🏛️ Why is it important?
ROCE is ideal for comparing companies with different financing structures. It shows how well management uses capital to create value for both shareholders and creditors.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high ROCE means the company uses its capital efficiently – regardless of whether it's funded by debt or equity.
- The higher the ROCE compared to peers, the more value the company creates with its invested capital.
- Especially relevant for capital-intensive sectors like industrials, energy, or infrastructure.
📘 Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
📈 What is it?
ROIC measures how efficiently a company generates returns from the capital invested in its core operations – regardless of whether the capital comes from equity or debt.
🧮 How is it calculated?
- NOPAT = Net Operating Profit After Taxes
- Invested Capital = Operating assets minus non-interest-bearing liabilities
🏛️ Why is it important?
ROIC is one of the most accurate indicators of capital efficiency. Unlike return on equity, it is not distorted by leverage and shows how much value is created for all capital providers.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high ROIC shows how effectively a company uses the capital that is truly invested in its core operations.
- Unlike ROCE, ROIC focuses only on the capital that is actively used to run the business – and that requires a return (i.e. interest-bearing).
- Especially useful when comparing companies with large amounts of excess cash or non-interest-bearing liabilities – giving a more realistic picture of capital efficiency.
📘 Leverage Ratio (Debt-to-Equity)
📈 What is it?
The leverage ratio indicates how much a company relies on interest-bearing debt (such as loans and bonds) relative to its shareholders’ equity.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
This ratio helps assess a company’s financial structure and risk profile. High leverage can enhance returns – but also increases exposure to interest rate changes and financial stress.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low leverage ratio signals financial strength and independence.
- A higher ratio can improve returns in good times but increases risk during downturns or rising interest rate periods.
- 👉 Always interpret in the context of industry, capital intensity, and interest rate environment.
📘 Earnings per share (EPS)
📈 What is it?
Earnings per Share (EPS) shows how much profit is attributable to a single share – and is one of the most important metrics for evaluating a company's performance.
🧮 How is it calculated?
The diluted share count reflects potential new shares that could be issued through options, convertible bonds, or other rights.
🏛️ Why is it important?
EPS is the basis for many key valuation metrics like P/E ratio, PEG ratio, or payout ratio. It enables comparisons of profitability across companies, regardless of their size.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- EPS captures per-share profitability and is especially useful for comparisons over time or with analyst estimates.
- Rising EPS may signal consistent growth or share buybacks.
- Important: Always use diluted EPS for more realistic valuations – especially in companies with stock-based compensation.
📘 Free cash flow per share (FCF per share)
📈 What is it?
Free Cash Flow per Share shows how much free cash flow a company generates per outstanding share – after investments, but before dividends or debt repayments.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Free cash flow is calculated as operating cash flow minus capital expenditures (CapEx).
🏛️ Why is it important?
FCF per Share reveals how much real cash is available per share – useful for dividends, buybacks, or reducing debt. Unlike net income, free cash flow is harder to manipulate and often seen as a more reliable metric.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- High FCF per share signals strong financial flexibility.
- It shows how much capital the company can effectively reinvest or return to shareholders.
- Particularly relevant for dividend payers and capital-efficient businesses.
📘 Short interest
📈 What is it?
Short interest indicates how many shares of a company are currently sold short – that is, borrowed and sold by investors who expect the price to decline.
🧮 How is it calculated?
It reflects the percentage of a company’s shares that are being shorted relative to the total shares available.
🏛️ Why is it important?
Short interest serves as a sentiment indicator: A high value may signal skepticism or bearish expectations – but also increases the potential for a short squeeze if prices rise unexpectedly.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Low short interest usually indicates market confidence in the company.
- High short interest can be a warning sign – or an opportunity if sentiment shifts.
- Especially relevant in volatile markets or ahead of key earnings releases.
📘 Employees
📈 What is it?
The employee count shows how many people a company employs worldwide – offering insights into its size, structure, and business model.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It helps assess operational scale, labor intensity, and cost structure. Combined with revenue and profit, it enables key metrics like revenue per employee or productivity.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high headcount can signal operational complexity – but also significant growth capacity.
- Revenue per employee is a key indicator of efficiency.
- Especially useful for comparing tech, industrial, or service-heavy companies.
📘 Turnover per employee
📈 What is it?
Revenue per employee indicates how much revenue a company generates on average per employee – a key measure of efficiency and productivity.
🧮 How is it calculated?
The employee count is typically taken from the most recent annual report.
🏛️ Why is it important?
This metric helps compare business models – especially between labor-intensive and technology-driven companies. A high value suggests automation, operational efficiency, or strong value creation per head.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high revenue per employee indicates a scalable and margin-strong business model.
- A low figure may reflect labor-intensive operations or lower value-add.
- Especially helpful when comparing tech companies to industrial or service sectors.
Brink's Company Stock Analysis
Analyst Opinions
7 Analysts have issued a Brink's Company forecast:
Analyst Opinions
7 Analysts have issued a Brink's Company forecast:
Brink's Company Events
Past Events
|
AUG
5
Q2 2026 Earnings Call
about one month ago
|
|
MAY
6
Q1 2026 Earnings Call
4 months ago
|
|
FEB
26
The Brink's Company, NCR Atleos Corporation - M&A Call
7 months ago
|
|
NOV
5
Q3 2025 Earnings Call
11 months ago
|
StocksGuide Free
Brink's Company — Q2 2026 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Good day, and welcome to the Brink's Company Second Quarter 2026 Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please note this event is being recorded.
This call and the Q&A session will contain forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from projected or estimated results. Information regarding factors that could cause such differences are available in today's press release and presentation and in the company's SEC filings. The information presented and discussed on this call is representative of today only. Brink's assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements. The call is copyrighted and may not be used without written permission from Brink's.
I will now turn it over to your host, Jesse Jenkins, Senior Vice President of Financial Planning and Analysis. Mr. Jenkins, you may begin.
Thanks, and good morning. Joining me are CEO, Mark Eubanks; and CFO, Kurt McMacken. Today, Brink's reported second quarter results on a GAAP, non-GAAP and constant currency basis. Most of our commentary today will be focused on our non-GAAP results. These non-GAAP financial measures are intended to provide investors with a supplemental comparison of our operating results and trends for the periods presented. We believe these measures allow investors to better compare performance over time and to evaluate our performance using the same metrics as management. Reconciliations of non-GAAP results to their most comparable GAAP results are provided in SEC filings, which can be found on our website.
We will also have commentary on the status of our pending acquisition of NCR Atleos. As a reminder, this transaction remains subject to the completion of customary closing conditions and additional regulatory approvals. Other details, including risk factors related to the transaction can be found in the pertinent SEC filings.
I will now turn the call over to Brink's CEO, Mark Eubanks.
Thanks, Jesse. Good morning, everyone. Starting on Slide 3. We delivered a strong second quarter with organic growth of 4% and ATM Managed Services and Digital Retail Solutions or AMS/DRS, growing 14%. This marks the 14th consecutive quarter of mid-teens or better organic revenue growth in AMS/DRS, more than doubling in total revenue over the same period of time to over $1.5 billion. We continue to focus our strategic efforts on growing these valuable lines of business and have good line of sight into continued growth in the second half, supported by some recent customer wins, which I'll talk about later. Cash and Viables Management, or CVM, performance was highlighted by continued strong growth in our Global Services business as we drive incremental revenue in the volatile precious metals markets.
Supported by favorable revenue mix and widespread productivity initiatives, we delivered record second quarter operating and EBITDA margins. EBITDA margins were 18.5% in the quarter, up 70 basis points year-over-year with expansion across each of our operating segments. Cash flow continues to grow with year-to-date and trailing 12-month free cash flow of $32 million over the prior periods. Total free cash flow generated over the last 4 quarters was $468 million with conversion from EBITDA of 46%, above our full year framework. Year-to-date, our results are slightly ahead of our original expectations. With EBITDA above the midpoint of our prior guidance, we're raising our full year profit expectations. As you'll see from our Q3 guidance in a few minutes, I'm confident in this team's ability to continue to improve the business, accelerate organic growth and drive higher margins and free cash flow over the balance of the year. We remain well positioned to deliver against our full year 2026 framework of mid-single-digit organic revenue growth with EBITDA margin expansion of 30 to 50 basis points.
Now turning to Slide 4. I'd like to provide an update on the NCR Atleos acquisition. Over the last few months, we've made considerable progress on many fronts and have moved our estimated closing timeline forward to early in the first quarter. Since our last public comments, we received overwhelming support from both NCR Atleos and Brink's shareholders with more than 99% of the votes cast in favor of the transaction. That endorsement reflects the confidence in the strategic merits of the combined companies. We also have satisfied several outstanding regulatory requirements. During the quarter, we were granted an early termination by the U.S. antitrust regulators. This clearance represents a meaningful step forward with the U.S. representing the largest concentration of combined company pro forma revenue of almost 40%. Other recent antitrust clearances include Brazil, India, Turkey, Colombia, and we continue to work constructively with the remaining other jurisdictions.
We're also making meaningful progress with foreign direct investment regulators, having received clearance across the majority of the Euro zone footprint, including France, Germany, Spain, Italy and the U.K. Money transmitter licensing requirements with the U.S. regulators are also moving forward with urgency. We've achieved clearance in more than 80% of the necessary jurisdictions and remain well on track in the remaining markets. Over the next several months until closing, we will stay focused on the stand-alone commitments of both companies while accelerating integration planning. Although we'll continue to operate independently until closing, our dedicated integration teams will work closely to ensure that we capture the strategic benefits of the combined businesses. As I continue to engage with the NCR Atleos team, I'm increasingly encouraged by the potential of the combination. With deep expertise and strong performance across both organizations, I'm confident we'll be able to deliver the solutions to our customers' most important challenges. I look forward to close the acquisition and moving forward as one team as quickly as possible.
Now shifting back to the quarter on Slide 5. I'll provide some commentary on performance by line of business. Starting with CVM, organic growth was slightly positive in the quarter with strong Global Services volume and good pricing discipline offset by AMS/DRS conversions. As we discussed last quarter, our Global Services business remained strong through the first half of the year. Moving to AMS/DRS. Revenue grew organically $50 million in the quarter at a rate of 14%. Late in the quarter, we saw several large installations and customer wins move into the second half, primarily reflecting customer-driven timing decisions. In the AMS business, we were recently awarded a full ATM outsourcing agreement for a network consortium of banks in Europe that will come online over the second half of the year. In DRS, we continue to deploy our solution across the Paradies footprint that we discussed last quarter, and I'll talk more about another key win in North America on the next slide.
AMS/DRS remains compelling outside of the more penetrated North America and Europe segments with strong growth in both Latin America and Rest of World. These recent wins and solid deployment schedules in the second half give us confidence in our ability to deliver organic growth towards the top end of our full year framework of mid- to high teens for the balance of the year. As we said last quarter, the visibility into our pipeline and backlog continues to support accelerated growth in the second half of the year. Stepping back and looking at total revenue trends for the quarter, we delivered a second quarter in line with our organic revenue expectations and customer engagement with our solutions remains very high. As you'll see in our Q3 guidance, we expect a slight acceleration in organic growth in the second half and remain on track to deliver against our organic growth framework for the full year.
Moving on to Slide 6. You can see a few details on a new DRS win in North America. We recently signed an enterprise agreement with a large retail chain to provide a full DRS solution. We are nearly doubling our share of wallet with this customer by providing our tech-enabled solutions at over 5,000 retail locations across a broad U.S. footprint. This customer will enjoy the security and reliability of Brink's solutions, the integration of physical to digital payments, working capital transparency and simplified cash handling. This in-store process simplification will unlock management time for more value-add activities across the entire retail environment like employee training, customer assistance and other in-store operational efficiency measures. While the customer benefits of DRS are clear, Brink's will also see meaningful productivity opportunities from this win as we increase density by adding a network that complements our existing footprint while optimizing the routes that already exist in most of our geographic locations. As I've said before, DRS is a true win-win in the marketplace, and we continue to have meaningful conversations with customers of all sizes in all of our markets. As we continue to improve our go-to-market approach in highly underpenetrated verticals, we expect to continue to deliver these kinds of wins that will set the foundation for future growth and margin accretion for years to come.
One other important point before we move to the next page relates to NCR's own U.S. ATM network, Allpoint, which has ATMs in all of these locations. This is an example of the opportunities that will create significant routing synergies and improve service levels as we increase network density. This optimization creates significant benefits for our DRS value proposition while also reducing service costs for an owned ATM network in the combined company. As we look at the next several years post acquisition, we see meaningful additional opportunities to drive operating efficiencies, enhance service levels and create value through the expanded network of the combined company.
Now on to Slide 7. You can see detail on our recent AMS win in a key Southeast Asia financial institution market. We recently won an AMS deal with Mandiri Bank in Indonesia, servicing more than 1/3 of their entire estate. Mandiri is the largest national bank in Indonesia, operating over 13,000 total ATMs. Southeast Asia remains an attractive market for AMS as we add Mandiri to the previously discussed wins in Indonesia and more recently, the Security Bank win in the Philippines. These end markets have favorable cash usage trends and remain attractive for outsourcing as banks look to optimize costs and better serve their customers. For reference, the total Mandiri estate of over 13,000 ATMs is larger than many of the top 10 banks in the U.S. market. With the ATM managed services market still underpenetrated, we are having meaningful customer discussions across the globe.
We continue to believe that outsourcing the operations and upkeep of these increasingly complex machines is the next logical step for financial institutions looking for ways to optimize their costs while continuing to improve customer experience at the intersection of physical and digital payments. After the completion of the NCR Atleos acquisition, we expect to have a best-in-class set of ATM Managed Services capabilities, positioning us to better serve financial institutions as they evaluate outsourcing opportunities in the markets around the world.
Moving on to Slide 8. Before I hand over to Kurt for more detail on the financials, I wanted to briefly update progress on North America margins. We continue to methodically advance toward 20% EBITDA margins, coming in at 19.8% on a trailing 12-month basis at the end of the second quarter. With a solid revenue mix outlook over the second half of the year, supported by recent customer wins at Paradies, Pandora and the large enterprise deal I spoke about a few slides ago, we expect to continue to march towards this level as an intermediate milestone in our continuous improvement journey. Our operations continue to improve and with a good pipeline of productivity initiatives, we expect to continue to drive asset efficiency and labor productivity as we move forward.
Over the past 5 years, we've improved our service, strengthened our safety culture, improved our AMS/DRS selling capabilities and eliminated waste from our operating model. The North America business is well positioned operationally to absorb additional capacity as we integrate the NCR Atleos business into our daily activities. With meaningful cost synergies contemplated in the North American markets, I remain confident that 20% margins is just the next milestone in our journey as a company, and I look forward to pressing beyond these levels in future years.
And with that, I'll turn it over to Kurt to walk through the financials and Q3 guidance before I return for some closing comments and Q&A. Kurt?
Thanks, Mark. I'll begin on Slide 10 with a look at the quarter. Revenue increased by 7% with 4% constant currency growth and a 3% tailwind from foreign currency. Adjusted EBITDA was up 11% to $257 million, with constant currency EBITDA growth rates more than double constant currency revenue growth rates. Operating profit was up $25 million year-over-year or 15%. EBITDA margins were up 70 basis points and operating profit margins were up 100 basis points, slightly ahead of our second quarter guidance expectations. EPS growth of 18% was more than double revenue growth as we continue to compound profits faster than our top line.
Trailing 12-month free cash flow was $468 million with conversion of 46%. Solid year-to-date cash performance was driven by EBITDA growth and continued capital efficiency as we shift to less capital-intensive customer offerings. As we expected and experienced last year, we are currently ahead of our full year cash conversion guidance. Given the timing of cash tax payments, working capital and CapEx over the balance of the year, we continue to target 40% to 45% conversion for the full year.
On Slide 11, total organic revenue growth was $54 million, with the majority of the growth coming from our higher-margin subscription-based strategic focus areas of AMS and DRS. FX contributed $37 million or 3% of growth in the quarter with favorable year-over-year rates in the Euro, Mexican peso and Brazilian real, partially offset by the Argentinian peso. Moving to the right side of the slide, you can see that $54 million of organic revenue growth converted to $21 million of EBITDA growth for an incremental flow-through to profits of 39%, driving total EBITDA margin expansion of 70 basis points over the prior year to record second quarter levels of 18.5%.
Moving to Slide 12. Starting on the left. Operating profit was up $25 million to $190 million with a margin of 13.6% on strong productivity, pricing and revenue mix. Interest expense was $63 million in the quarter, flat sequentially and is expected to remain roughly the same in future periods using current interest rate expectations. Tax expense was $34 million in the quarter, representing an effective tax rate of 27.3%, slightly better than the prior year. Income from continuing operations was $88 million on 41.5 million diluted shares for an EPS of $2.13. Depreciation and amortization was $64 million in the quarter and is expected to be roughly $250 million for the full year.
Let's move to Slide 13 to discuss our capital allocation framework. Our capital allocation framework remains unchanged despite the pending NCR Atleos acquisition. Our leverage at the end of the second quarter was 2.7x net debt to adjusted EBITDA. With the pending acquisition set to temporarily move us over 3 turns at close, we continue to expect the primary use of capital during 2026 to be preemptive debt paydown. Over the year, we expect to reduce our stand-alone leverage to approximately 2.3x as we position for the transaction. As we have mentioned previously, we plan to rapidly delever after closing and are targeting net leverage below 3x by the end of 2027. Once we return to our targeted leverage level of 2 to 3x, we expect to resume our prior capital allocation model with at least 50% of free cash flow focused on shareholder returns. Given the expected EBITDA growth after closing, both organically and through synergies, we expect to continue net debt leverage reduction during 2028. With approximately $1 billion of free cash flow approaching $20 per share, we will have ample flexibility to capitalize on accretive uses of capital that will compound cash generation.
Moving to the guidance on Slide 14. Our framework for 2026 is unchanged. We expect to deliver mid-single-digit total organic growth, supported by mid- to high teens organic growth for AMS/DRS. With the second quarter EBITDA above the midpoint of prior guidance, we are raising our full year organic profit numbers despite the recent change in foreign currency. Using rates as of yesterday, we are currently expecting an FX benefit for the full year of between 1.5% and 2.5%, less than our expectations last quarter. EBITDA margins are expected to expand between 30 and 50 basis points with conversion of EBITDA to free cash flow of between 40% and 45%.
In the third quarter, we expect revenue between $1.365 billion and $1.415 billion, reflecting slight organic growth acceleration sequentially. As Mark mentioned earlier, we expect second half organic growth in AMS/DRS to be towards the top end of our full year framework to drive this acceleration. Using yesterday's spot rates, FX is expected to be flat to less than a percentage point of benefit year-on-year. Adjusted EBITDA is expected to be between $263 million and $283 million, reflecting margin expansion of approximately 60 basis points to 19.6% at the midpoint. EPS is expected to be between $2.23 and $2.63.
And with that, I'll turn it back over to Mark for some closing comments.
Thanks, Kurt. On Slide 15, you can see how we plan to create value for years to come in our business. The key tenets of this strategy are unchanged over the years and will guide how we move forward through the rest of '26 and through the acquisition. We continue to operate at a high level, improving the growth profile, profit margins and cash generation of the business in a consistent and measurable way. We've made good progress over the years, but in many ways, we're still in the early innings. There remains ample opportunities in our base business to continue to improve our operating model and drive waste out of our day-to-day frontline and back-office activities. After this acquisition, we'll be well positioned to accelerate these efforts across a $10 billion global enterprise with fresh new growth and margin opportunities. While the size of the business changes, the strategy remains constant. We will grow the business behind higher-margin recurring revenue service offerings that solve the complex problems of our retail and banking customers. We will be positioned to capture industry outsourcing momentum in the ATM market while we continue to transform the retail cash management industry through DRS.
As I approach my 5-year anniversary with Brink's next month, I'm proud of the progress we've made transforming our business, shifting our business model to higher-margin recurring revenue AMS/DRS offerings while driving consistent productivity, margin expansion and improved free cash flow conversion. Even with this progress, I'm even more excited about the opportunities that remain in front of us. Working from the strong foundation we've built, I'm energized for the future and I look forward to driving shareholder value creation to new levels in the years to come. Before we take questions, I want to congratulate both the Brink's and NCR Atleos teams on a strong second quarter and for their steadfast focus on delivering for our customers and for our shareholders.
And with that, we'll open the line for questions. Operator?
[Operator Instructions] Our first question today comes from George Tong of Goldman Sachs.
2. Question Answer
This is Sammy on for George. Can you break down the 14% AMS and DRS organic growth between pricing, new customer wins and expansion with existing customers? And how much of your second half AMS and DRS growth outlook is already supported by contracted business versus opportunities still in the pipeline?
Sure. Yes. We'll start with the back half first. We have a very strong pipeline. In fact, in the quarter, had a few deals that actually deployments on AMS/DRS that moved out of second quarter into the third. So we expect to have continued acceleration in the back half and have good visibility to many of those contracts and/or sales pipelines where we have high confidence. And as we've said in the past, DRS is usually a shorter window of certainty, maybe a quarter, maybe like 2 quarters and AMS usually a bit longer, 2 quarters to maybe a full year in some of those deployments.
So as we look at the third quarter guidance, we've anticipated this acceleration as well as getting back to our full year framework for organic growth in the mid- to high teens. That continues to be supported by a few large deals. As I mentioned, the enterprise retailer we laid out that we came to an agreement with in the second quarter for 5,000 locations and really an interesting opportunity for us as we look at the overlap of the NCR Allpoint network as you think about that sort of post transaction and really being able to improve service to those customers as we visit not only for DRS solutions but also for AMS support. So really excited about that.
And then if you move around the world, we've got several large ATM deployments. One I mentioned in Europe around a bank consortium and the second, we explicitly talked about, which was Mandiri. And again, a large opportunity in Indonesia. When you think about that market, both Indonesia and the rest of Asia Pacific, it's a really big cash market with a big population, growing population that continues to be an area of strength for us. And you can see in the individual growth rates for that market. Rest of world growing 44% year-on-year, up admittedly a smaller base, but a big growth number down in that region. We expect that to continue here in the short term.
I might just add -- I might just add on the question on price versus volume. Remember, AMS and DRS, it's mostly volume. There's some price in there, but it's a much smaller piece of total price. It's really a volume-driven number.
And so that means mainly new customers or share of wallet. You asked about expansion within existing customers. I don't have that data in front of me. We are expanding share of wallet with customers. But for the most part, as Kurt said, that's really new locations, new deployments, new services because the nature of these agreements are longer-term recurring revenue.
That's helpful. And then just on organic growth, North America, Latin America and Europe all decelerated to about 2% this quarter. Was there a common factor driving that across the regions? And where do you expect improvement as you move through the back half of the year?
Yes. Really, this was -- North America specifically was really a timing issue on these customer deployments, as I said. We expect the organic growth for total to pick up. But certainly, that's mainly an AMS/DRS story, which was a large part of the growth number. If you think about Latin America, I didn't talk about it earlier, but the economy is actually pretty stable down there across the region. We talked about Argentina. Of course, that's a bit of an anomaly in the region. There we continue to see depressed consumption down there just given their austerity measures across the government. But long term, it's a good business for us, good margins, good cash economy, and we think the austerity is probably healthy for them to get back on track.
And our team down there is doing a really good job as well, managing through a tough situation. So that provided a little bit of a headwind. But you look at Latin America, 34% quarter-on-quarter growth with AMS/DRS and probably could have been a little better given some of the contracts we have in hand and just again, timing on deployments that kind of moved out of Q2 or in Q3. So we're still very, very bullish about it. In Latin America, particularly around DRS, we continue to see good penetration of both our existing customers with conversions, but also with the unvended space. So all in all, pretty good.
The next question comes from Tim Mulrooney of William Blair.
So you're getting really close to your intermediate target for North America margins. As we think about your ability to press beyond that 20%, can you talk about how you think about incremental margins in this business, just a framework here or potential incremental margins? Help us understand what the opportunity is to press beyond 20% because if incremental margins aren't much higher than that, then folks are going to assume it kind of tops out there. So I thought I'd give you the opportunity to talk about in kind of a framework way?
Sure. Tim, the way we think about it, particularly on the AMS/DRS side is relative to the existing market, it's almost infinite. It's -- the unvended space is so large. And so as we continue to shift our business model away from this linear investment of capacity to serve an incremental customer, the network effect and the density continues to drive up those incrementals higher and higher as we create more and more density. And that's not just from the incremental new locations, but it's also, let's say, trapped productivity that's sitting inside of our existing [ CIP ] customers that are non-DRS. So as we think about converting those. So we think that, that incremental rate can continue to creep up.
Layer on -- besides our own business, layer that on now with the NCR business, and we've laid out some of those synergies already in the beginning. But we would certainly hope that as we put those 2 businesses together, we continue to improve our density on the retail side, not just where their Allpoint network exists today as a cross-selling opportunity, but just more and more of our existing service base and the existing retail locations, we think that can continue to creep. The 20% number is -- it's sort of a headline number, Tim, that we've had investors ask us about relative to other business services and route-based industrial business margins.
And it's why we continue to sort of point to it. But it's not -- in our view, it's not a destination. It's only going to be a point in time that we maybe take a short victory lap with the team and celebrate, but keep moving. And that's the way we're thinking about it, and we think that framework can continue to move up from those 20% incrementals as we go further.
Yes. That's a good point, Mark, that I hadn't fully considered that the incremental margins are not static as you continue to densify the network. So a really good point. And then you also brought up, which was going to be my next question, how a combined Brink's and NCR could drive those incremental margins in North America higher, even higher. Is there anything beyond the cost synergies, the obvious cost synergies that would drive that higher? Is that what you were thinking about? Or are there opportunities beyond that, that would also potentially drive that higher?
Sure. The cost synergies we've laid out already, and that's largely most of the -- we put in the business case. I think the other area, Tim, as we think forward, though, is as we build more density and leverage a shared network and think about customers not just in terms of an individual contract or an individual location, but a network, a consortium, a continuum of services, we're going to think about that long term about where do we send the right technician, the right service person in the field to the right location with the right material or right skill set. And that optimization, we think, can continue to drive not just lower cost as we already laid out, we think it can drive better service and quality for our customers that's going to allow us to grow more.
And I think this is all part of the strategic thesis of this acquisition is for us, the combined company to really be a catalyst for an end-to-end solution, whether that's full outsourcing or some subset of that, we think that, that combination can do that. And again, the more we grow in locations, the more services we're doing, the more we're going to create incremental margin leverage going forward.
Yes. Very clear. I did have one more question, but I don't want to be rude. Should I ask one more question? Or you want me to hop back in the...
Yes, that's fine. Sure.
Okay. Yes. So shifting gears completely. Ever since you announced this deal with NCR Atleos, we've been getting a lot of questions from investors around ATM Managed Services, AMS. And the one big question we've been getting is around the pace of ATM outsourcing in the U.S. and Europe with financial institutions. So the question is what inning do you think we are in with regional and national banks? And is there anything that you can point to that suggests this is something that will or could accelerate in the coming years?
Sure. Yes, good question. I think we are in early innings of this. And although you can see the strong growth numbers from the NCR Atleos team around ATM as a Service. You can see our growth rates and some of the announcements that we've made. We've seen a little bit of bifurcation in market activity, though, between North America and Europe that you referenced. And in Europe, we've certainly seen more activities by financial institutions to either outsourced networks, which we've done. We outsourced BPCE, which is over 10,000 locations today in France. There's also been banks taking another route building out their cooperatives or consortiums.
And so we see this as a trend that's going to favor our services, our outsourcing offering for the long term. And we think that will only continue as people continue to look for more and more efficiency and productivity along the way and look to a partner that's going to have the most fulsome solution. And that's happening, and of course, we've talked about -- there's a bank in Europe -- that we're contracted with now to outsource their consortium of banks, their ATM network. So we definitely are seeing it. And there's a lot in the pipeline. Certainly, we're talking to all of the banks that we -- that are our customers. And I know the NCR Atleos team has been doing that also even before our announcement, obviously.
In North America, it's been a little bit different in that we've seen lots of small banks, community banks, credit unions and so forth, kind of the place where the managed services stack really has resonated. And that's largely a cost and efficiency scale play. And I think that's -- it's pretty obvious. And both us and the NCR team have had pretty good progress there and that's pretty supportive.
The other part though, Tim, that you're -- maybe you're getting to is big -- what are the big financial institutions in the U.S. to do. And we get this question from investors all the time. And listen, we think that there's a time and point where our services of a full stack, a full suite of managed services will be attractive to these banks, and we would expect that to be part of our future growth algorithm to say that there is someone ready today to just outsource everything. That's not -- I'm not ready to talk about that today. But we do think this -- the growth opportunity that's embedded in the existing ATM, let's say, market construct relative to managed services or ATM as a Service is very favorable in the long term.
And we've talked about the TAM being 2 or 3x. If that's a 10-year TAM, 2 or 3x in the available market over the next decade, that's a lot of incremental growth opportunity along the way. So -- and I think I laid that out in the -- in previous calls that we think our solution will be -- the combined solution will be the kind of best-in-class from servicing quality and kind of clear orchestration, not just cost efficiency, but servicing quality. And that for us is -- we think we're going to be sitting at the table having those conversations for many years to come to be a better partner for our financial institutions.
It sounds like a very exciting opportunity, Mark. Thanks for laying all that out for me and good luck on the next 5 years.
Our next question comes from Tobey Sommer of Truist.
On the regulatory front associated with the deal, nice to see you say, the early part of '27. Could you maybe speak to what are the longest lead time items and geographies associated with that? And what would need to happen to be able to close even earlier?
Sure. Yes, we're -- we continue to be hyper-focused and moving with urgency and pace. I mentioned it in my prepared comments around not only the antitrust, but the foreign direct investment as well as some of the money transmitter license here in North America. But Tim, I mean, Tobey, we have so many kind of parallel paths going. It's hard to say any one thing is sort of in the way. What I can say is that all of the activities that we contemplated when we announced the deal have trended in the positive direction. And I talked about DOJ, particularly here in North America -- in the U.S. with early termination. That wasn't that wasn't the 100% case that could have gone longer.
And I think we continue to make our case in the same way to these other jurisdictions. We still -- we laid out, I think, a few that we've gotten through. But most of these processes are all confidential and I probably wouldn't go any further to say anything on any specific. I think to make these go faster was your question, what could change the date in advance of that. It would be that we got clearance from some of the remaining European area, we've got some in Latin America and still some in Asia Pacific to get through. So yes, early termination -- early resolution of those beyond the track we're on. But nothing to report today, Tobey, that would say we could do any better than kind of early Q1.
Okay. I wanted to ask a question about your incentive comp and how you're thinking about that for the firm as you join with NCR Atleos. You've had, I think, a successful track record of changing compensation throughout the organization to focus efforts on growth in AMS and DRS. And wondering if you -- how you would contemplate any modifications to that to drive further growth and integration within the business as you turn the page into '27 and beyond.
Yes, sure. It's a really good question. We certainly think the key tenets of the strategy are intact. And maybe I said that in the prepared comments as well that this deal relative to our strategy is right down the middle and supporting, of course, AMS, but also DRS. I think as we think about incentive comp going forward, we really want to continue to do more of the same. And I think the acceleration, the meaningful push that we've had internally and culturally around AMS/DRS it's improvement that our incentive comp worked.
I think the other side of that is the operational side, we've also seen and certainly around free cash flow, and we've talked about that previously, and we would expect to do the same. Good news is the NCR team already highly focused on ATM as a Service and improving their long-term contracted service recurring revenue base, which is where we want to be. And also, you've seen their performance, which has been strong in and around free cash flow. So I think culturally, it won't be so difficult to do that. We just want to make sure we've got people pointed toward the right North Star and reward them when they get there.
And listen, we think from a management perspective, all the way up to our Board that making sure that our incentive comp lines up with what our shareholders are interested in and the profile of the company and where we want to take the company, I think it is paramount to success, and we'll continue to do that. And I know the NCR team will be aligned.
I appreciate that, Mark. And I want to pull out a string there, and that's the cash conversion. You've done very well year-to-date, and noticed in some of your projections associated with the deal that maybe there's an opportunity to crack that 50% barrier. Could you talk about the puts and takes around setting and achieving an even higher cash conversion from EBITDA?
Tobey, it's Kurt here. Let me take this one. Look, I'd say both companies are really focused on improving their free cash flow conversion. And for us, as you know, a big piece of that is changing the business model, focusing on AMS and DRS because it's less capital intensive and getting capital out of the system, but also focusing on the basics around working capital turns and then other aspects of free cash flow generation. So we're marching towards that, and so are they.
So we definitely see that between the EBITDA growth, better capital management between the 2 companies, driven by the business model and then both companies really working on working capital and both companies making progress there that we're going to see us continue to march up on free cash flow conversion. There's nothing that holds us back from continuing to move up the levels you're talking about.
This concludes our question-and-answer session and brings us to the end of our conference. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.
Brink's Company — Q2 2026 Earnings Call
Brink's Company — Q1 2026 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Good day, and welcome to the Brink's Company First Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please note this event is being recorded. I would like to turn the conference over to Jesse Jenkins, Vice President, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Thanks, and good morning. Here with me today are CEO, Mark Eubanks; and CFO, Kurt McMaken. This morning, Brink's reported first quarter results on a GAAP, non-GAAP and constant currency basis. Most of our commentary today will be focused on our non-GAAP results. These non-GAAP financial measures are intended to provide investors with a supplemental comparison of our operating results and trends for the periods presented. We believe these measures allow investors to better compare performance over time and to evaluate our performance using the same metrics as management.
Reconciliation of non-GAAP results to their most comparable GAAP results are provided in the SEC filings, which can be found on our website. We will also have commentary on the status of our pending acquisition of NCR Atleos. As a reminder, this transaction is subject to the completion of customary closing conditions, including regulatory approvals and approval by Brink's and NCR Atleos shareholders. Additional details, including risk factors related to the transaction can be found in the pertinent SEC filings. I will now turn the call over to Brink's CEO, Mark Eubanks.
Thanks, Jesse, and good morning, everyone. Starting on Slide 3. We're pleased with another strong quarter of growth and operational execution as we continue to transform Brink's into a more predictable and profitable enterprise. I want to thank all of our team members, especially those in the Middle East region, for their focus in this dynamic global economic backdrop. I could not be more proud of our teams for staying focused and delivering on our Q1 commitments. Our results were at the upper end of our first quarter guidance ranges, and we're off to a strong start to the year.
First quarter revenue growth of 10% included 4.5% organic growth, driven mostly by 15% organic growth in ATM Managed Services and Digital Retail Solutions or AMS/DRS. The growth in the quarter was highlighted by the onboarding of Pandora in DRS and good momentum in AMS, especially in the Rest of World segment. At the segment level, Rest of World delivered 7% organic growth on strong precious metals activity in the global services line of business. Overall, organic growth, favorable revenue mix and good underlying productivity drove margin expansion of 10 basis points with over 100 basis points of expansion in both North America and Rest of World and 240 basis points of expansion in Europe.
In total, Q1 EBITDA was $238 million with a margin of 17.3%, trailing 12-month EBITDA was $1 billion for the first time in our history this quarter, reflecting a more than $200 million increase since the end of 2022 as we continue to deliver profitable growth across our business. We also continue to improve cash generation with an increase of $66 million year-over-year in the first quarter. On a trailing 12-month basis, free cash flow exceeded $0.5 billion for the first time in our company's history with conversion from EBITDA of 50%. Operationally, we saw improvement in both days of sales outstanding and days payable outstanding.
Coupled with EBITDA growth I mentioned earlier, total free cash flow has more than doubled since year-end 2022, with free cash flow now exceeding $12 per share. As I review the quarter, we delivered on our commitments with results at the top end of our guidance range. As I mentioned, I'm proud of our consistent execution during volatile market conditions and our team's focus on the heels of the announcement of our transformational acquisition of NCR Atleos. Supported by this strong first quarter, I remain confident in our ability to continue our trajectory and deliver our full framework for 2026.
Turning to Slide 4. You can see the components of our value creation strategy, which remain unchanged for 2026 and are well aligned with the strategic rationale of the NCR Atleos acquisition. We expect organic growth in 2026 to remain consistent in the mid-single digits, driven primarily by new and converted customer growth in recurring AMS and DRS revenue, which is expected to approach 1/3 of our total company revenue by year-end. The acquisition of NCR Atleos is expected to accelerate our ability to capture these AMS and DRS customers by delivering a more vertically integrated AMS offering and lowering our cost base through increased network density on the retail side of our business.
On a stand-alone basis for 2026, we expect EBITDA margins to expand by 30 to 50 basis points as we shift revenue to these higher-margin services and drive cost productivity across our operations. This mix shift is expected to continue after completion of the acquisition and cost efficiencies are expected to accelerate behind the $200 million of cost synergies that we previously identified as we eliminate duplicative SG&A and public company costs, optimize our service delivery network and finally, drive global procurement savings.
Both companies have delivered meaningful improvement in cash generation over the last few years, and we expect that will compound as we combine our 2 businesses. In addition to working capital improvements, we've already completed a secured financing arrangement that will allow us to absorb the $1.6 billion of NCR Atleos bank debt at a rate that is more than 1 full percentage point better than their current level. While we're focused on the near term on reducing leverage, we expect to produce a combined $1 billion of free cash flow from the 2 companies, providing flexibility to maximize value creation through strategic investments and shareholder returns.
Shifting back to the quarter on Slide 5, I'll provide some commentary on performance by line of business. Starting with Cash and Valuables Management, or CVM. Organic growth was 1% in the quarter with good pricing discipline offsetting a couple of percentage points of AMS/DRS conversions. Our Global Service business was also strong again this quarter despite lapping a robust first quarter of 2025. Precious metals movement remain volatile and trends can change rapidly, but we factored in the current favorable trends into our second quarter guidance. AMS/DRS revenue grew organically approximately $50 million in the quarter for a rate of 15%. This was the 13th consecutive quarter of at least 15% organic growth in AMS/DRS as we continue to build momentum in these important businesses.
It's important to note that in the fourth quarter of last year, we saw strong growth related to onetime equipment sales, primarily in North America that impacts the sequential comparisons. Factoring in this dynamic, growth in the quarter was in line with our expectations and positions us well to deliver our guidance for the full year. In DRS, we continue to see positive momentum with large enterprise customers in North America, including the onboarding of Pandora during the late fourth and early first quarters.
In AMS, we're lapping some large wins in the prior year like Sainsbury's, while we stage for other large deployments, including some in the Rest of World segment. We continue to see positive AMS trends with banking customers, including in Southeast Asia, where we recently won the largest national bank in Indonesia with about 5,000 ATMs. Looking to the balance of the year, we expect AMS and DRS to accelerate sequentially, supported by our strong pipelines and DRS backlogs, including Paradies that will lead us directly into the next slide.
On Slide 6, I'd like to highlight an example of the type of wins we're delivering with DRS. Paradies is a leading travel retailer and restaurateur, operating over 700 stores in airports across North America. They offer major brands like Chick-fil-A, Tumi, Starbucks today and Jimmy John's just to name a few. Paradies came to us to help solve common dilemmas they see across large global retail and quick-serve organizations. I've often discussed DRS as a true win-win for both Brink's and retailers, and that's clearly the case here with Paradies. We designed a bespoke solution incorporating both front office recyclers and smart safes that integrate directly with Paradies POS software.
Our solutions are expected to help them with several pain points across their global footprint. Among other things, we're able to reduce cash handling time for managers and employees, unlocking productivity and efficiency within their stores. Our solution digitizes cash quickly and tracks transactions down to the teller level, reducing operational shrink across the business. We are also able to simplify service delivery for customers as we shift our key quality service deliverable from arriving within a certain appointment window to providing overnight electronic deposits for faster access to working capital. This shift creates flexible routing and scheduling options for Brink's, allowing us to arrive when needed or when easily added to an existing scheduled trip into the area.
We completed a successful trial phase with Paradies and are planning for the full rollout across their entire footprint over the balance of the year. While the solution we designed for Paradies is unique to their specific needs, the problems we're solving for customers are universal. Our DRS offerings have a clear and demonstrated value proposition for retailers of all sizes. As we close more of these deals, I remain confident that we're in the early stages still of our efforts to expand our DRS business across the retail landscape in all geographies that we serve.
On Slide 7, you can see our methodical progress towards 20% EBITDA margins in North America. In Q1, EBITDA margins in this segment expanded by 170 basis points year-over-year, driving trailing 12-month margins to 19.5%. Revenue mix has been a big contributor to this progression. It was another great quarter of AMS/DRS growth in North America as we continue to convert customers and install new DRS units, including the Pandora win that we mentioned last quarter. Global Services revenue growth was also strong this quarter despite an elevated prior year period comparable. Our shift to higher-margin flexible service recurring revenue is unlocking operational productivity across the business.
Over the years, we've improved and standardized our service delivery network to enable profitable growth. This improvement is clear in the numbers as we continue to deliver improvements in revenue per vehicle and labor as a percentage of revenue. This is setting the stage for continued momentum post closing of our NCR Atleos acquisition as we layer on additional volume to our more efficient network. I'm confident increased scale will position us to drive further expanded margins well beyond our preliminary 20% targets.
Turning to Slide 8. I'd like to provide a brief update on the NCR Atleos transaction. While we've been publicly engaged with shareholders over the last 8 to 10 weeks, we've been working hard diligently behind the scenes to progress this transformational acquisition forward. At the end of March, we successfully completed a refinancing of the secured portion of the bridge loan, increasing our capacity while unlocking attractive rates and improving certain conditions in our credit agreement. Just last week, we filed our registration statement and are progressing towards a shareholder vote over the next few months.
We're making good progress on the regulatory front as well with filings submitted in many jurisdictions and reviews progressing as expected. NCR Atleos first quarter results will be filed after the market closed today, and we understand them to be in line with our business case modeling and on track with our full year projections. Though NCR Atleos will continue to operate independently until closing, we expect our integration management team to work closely with NCR Atleos to plan and prepare for the execution of the potential cost synergies.
Importantly, we've created a dedicated integration management team within Brink's that is isolated from the day-to-day operations of our business and will be responsible for driving program execution of cost synergies after closing. While we're still in the early process in many ways, we're making good progress and continue to expect closing will occur by the end of the first quarter of 2027. The more we interact with our internal teams, our customers and the NCR Atleos management teams, the more encouraged I am by the potential of this combination. Supported by strong momentum in AMS and DRS and ATM as-a-Service, it remains clear that this is the right strategic direction at the right time to accelerate our growth and bolster our business for the future.
Before I hand it over to Kurt to walk through the financials, I want to thank our team for embracing the power of our strategy. We've lifted our performance by consistently delivering on our external commitments while improving our service levels to our customers, even redefining the definition of what service quality means. Our team is focused on continuing our efforts to move the business forward behind AMS/DRS customer offerings that deliver clear win-wins for both the customers and for Brink's.
I'm encouraged by the strong results we delivered, the strong momentum supporting us and I'm even more optimistic about the future potential as we combine with NCR Atleos and position ourselves to accelerate growth, profitability and value creation. And with that, I'll hand it over to Kurt to discuss the financials, and I'll come back for Q&A. Kurt?
Thanks, Mark. I'll begin on Slide 10 with a look at Q1. Revenue increased 10% with 5% constant currency growth and a 6% tailwind from foreign currency. Adjusted EBITDA was up 10% to $238 million with operating profit up 12%. Both operating profit and EBITDA accelerated 10 basis points year-over-year on favorable revenue mix, pricing discipline and productivity in both labor and fleet. Earnings per share was $1.80, up 11%.
In the quarter, we completed approximately $30 million of share repurchases prior to the NCR Atleos acquisition announcement, reducing outstanding shares by 5%. As Mark mentioned earlier, trailing 12-month free cash flow was $502 million at the end of the quarter, representing conversion of 50%. I would like to call out that we have enhanced our cash flow disclosures to highlight cash flows related to the NCR Atleos acquisition, which were $2 million in the quarter and are expected to be between $50 million to $60 million for the full year. We believe it is important to isolate these cash flows for investors so they can get a better picture of the true underlying cash generation of the business.
These cash flows are included in our expectations to get to approximately 2.3x by the end of 2026. Similar to timing from the prior year, we are currently ahead of our full year cash conversion guidance after Q1. We expect the timing of certain cash tax payments and cash investments over the balance of the year to return us to our target level of 40% to 45% by the end of the year. On Slide 11, total organic growth was $56 million or more than 85% of the growth came from higher-margin subscription-based AMS and DRS.
The $8 million of CVM growth was in line with expectations and represents volume growth in Global Services and strong pricing execution, partially offset by the conversion of customers to AMS and DRS. FX contributed $71 million of growth in the quarter with favorable year-over-year rates primarily in the euro and Mexican peso. Shifting to the right side of the slide, growth of $128 million generated $23 million of EBITDA, expanding margins by 10 basis points. As you will see from our guidance for Q2, we expect expansion to accelerate into the second quarter as we continue growth into AMS and DRS.
Moving to Slide 12. Starting on the left. Operating profit was up $18 million to $168 million with a margin of 12.2% on strong productivity, pricing and line of business revenue mix. Interest expense was $64 million in the quarter, up about $6 million year-over-year and in line sequentially with the fourth quarter. For the full year, interest expense is expected to be just over $250 million using current interest rate expectations. Tax expense was $29 million in the quarter, representing an effective tax rate of 27.6%, in line with the prior year rate. Interest income and other was down $6 million year-over-year, primarily due to lower interest income related to the prior year repatriation of cash from Argentina.
Income from continuing operations was $75 million. Depreciation and amortization was $64 million, primarily reflecting increased depreciation from growth in AMS and DRS equipment. In total, first quarter adjusted EBITDA was $238 million, up $23 million year-over-year with margins expanding 10 basis points. Let's move to Slide 13 to discuss our capital allocation framework. Our capital allocation framework has remained consistent during Mark and my tenure, including through our transformational investment in NCR Atleos. Our leverage at the end of the first quarter was 2.7x net debt to adjusted EBITDA.
During 2026, we expect net debt leverage reduction to be the primary focus of our capital allocation as we position our balance sheet for the NCR Atleos acquisition. Over the year, we expect to reduce our stand-alone leverage to approximately 2.3x. While we expect leverage to be approximately 3.4x, assuming Q1 2027 closing, we are currently expecting to be below 3x by the end of 2027. We continue to believe that 2 to 3x is the right leverage to balance capital efficiency and appeal to existing and potential equity investors.
Our capital allocation framework has generated meaningful shareholder value over the last several years. The growth acceleration potential into high-margin recurring revenue AMS and DRS is expected to continue to drive margin expansion and compound cash generation for years to come. With clear line of sight to a combined free cash flow of $1 billion, we expect to have the flexibility to make strategic investments and return capital to shareholders in the future.
Moving to guidance on Slide 14. Our framework for 2026 remains unchanged. We expect to deliver mid-single-digit total organic growth, supported by mid- to high teens organic growth for AMS/DRS. Using rates as of yesterday, we are currently expecting to see an FX tailwind for the full year of between 2% and 3%. EBITDA margins are expected to expand between 30 and 50 basis points with conversion of EBITDA to free cash flow of between 40% and 45%.
In the second quarter, we expect revenue between $1.37 billion and $1.43 billion, reflecting organic growth in the mid-single digits. Using yesterday's spot rates, FX is expected to be a year-on-year tailwind of just below 3% at the midpoint. Adjusted EBITDA is expected to be between $245 million and $265 million, reflecting 10% growth and margin expansion of approximately 40 basis points at the midpoint. EPS is expected to be between $1.85 and $2.25. And with that, we are happy to now take your questions. Operator, please open the line.
[Operator Instructions] The first question comes from George Tong with Goldman Sachs.
2. Question Answer
In DRS, can you perhaps quantify how much of the growth came from conversion of traditional cash-in-transit customers versus greenfield wins?
Yes, sure. We have -- again, George, a good quarter for us in Q1 kind of everywhere in DRS. But particularly as you think about convergence, again, we stay on track what we've seen in prior quarters. So about 1/3 of the installs really coming from conversions of existing customers, which, as we've talked about previously, gives us a little bit of headwind in CVM, but of course, get the benefits of the better margin and certainly recurring revenue.
The 2/3, though, really, we continue to be excited about because these are new customers that are either unvended or were previously vended by some other solution. You can see -- we talked about the Pandora deal a little bit in the call. We had it in our presentation last quarter, where we were able to really provide an enterprise solution for a customer that we were able to identify, negotiate and deploy fairly rapidly to collapse our time to revenue. We didn't get a chance to talk about it much last quarter, as you know, given the deal announcement. But if you look at, again, this quarter, another really nice deal here with Paradies, that's one of the airport operators for food and quick serve and retail.
And again, just the opportunity to work with customers like that to provide a unique solution, whether that's leveraging hardware, software, POS integration and even some of our cash forecasting and balancing software really allows us to tailor a solution to almost any retail environment as we look to streamline and optimize the total cash ecosystem inside these retail stores. And this is something we'll continue to see going forward.
Very helpful. And then you expect AMS/DRS growth to accelerate sequentially given the strong backlog. What are your latest thoughts on what sustainable medium-term AMS/DRS growth can be?
Sure. I think -- we think this mid- to high teens organic growth will continue, George, here, certainly this year. And I don't know what your medium term is, but we've got a view as we go into '27 and get this deal closed, we can do -- continue to accelerate that more. So we're excited about it. And I think if you look at our backlog coming out of Q4 into Q1, team is excited about what we've got lined up for the second half of this year as we're installing those in Q1 as well as Q2. But you can see the organic growth rates are continuing.
Although we were a little bit higher in Q4, about 22%, as we mentioned previously, we had a pretty significant amount of equipment sales, particularly in North America. But even that was still in the high teens from an organic perspective, and that continued into Q1. Q1 is typically a little bit lighter just given the fact that we don't do a whole lot of installations during Q4 retail season because most of our retailers are -- it's a busy season, particularly North America and Europe, where they don't want us in their stores installing. So we tend to carry a good backlog into Q1 and Q2.
The next question comes from Tobey Sommer with Truist.
I'd like to double-click on AMS and DRS again. How would you describe the geographical differences you're seeing in customer uptake and demand? And then what do you think it takes to light a fire under financial institutions in North America for this to take off?
Yes. Good question, Tobey, because we're really starting to to see more broad AMS/DRS growth around the world. And you can see, particularly in Latin America in the quarter, we're seeing Mexico continue to have a good run here in DRS that is allowing us to not only convert customers, but continue to improve margins and build out an installed base. We're seeing that in Argentina as well. And then, of course, in Brazil, we've been having success, and that continues. We're seeing more AMS and DRS, but particularly, I called out AMS in the Rest of World segment, which is really good because these are big cash markets that are kind of much earlier cycle when it comes to AMS/DRS conversion.
But last quarter, we talked about AMS Security Bank down in the Philippines that we're currently deploying. We also then talked this quarter about Indonesia, although we've had some success in Indonesia previously. This is a pretty big deployment there. So we feel good about that. We're seeing banks in Rest of World as well as Latin America continue to either make decisions or continue to look at better ways to serve their continued ATM needs. If we move to the Northern Hemisphere, Europe and North America, of course, Europe is our most highly penetrated AMS/DRS market.
And again, a good -- continue to have good progress there and a good outlook as we think about Q2 and Q3. But North America, certainly, our DRS trajectory continues to go higher. And you see it in our margins, and I called it out in the North American deep dive there, we continue to see the good mix benefits from DRS, particularly as we see going forward. The last part of your question was around North America banks, particularly U.S. banks. And that's something that we're continuing to have lots of discussions. And as we think about the services across the entire continuum for ATMs and ATM managed services, we're starting to get up those opportunities.
And whether that's some of the off-branch bank at work ATMs or whether that's specific services and/or managed services on the on-branch, the full outsourcing continues to be a little slower than -- certainly a lot slower than the Rest of the World. I think this is one of the things that we think about with the Atleos acquisition, Tobey, and getting to a full vertical solution where customer outcomes can be better controlled and I think create more confidence with those customers about a full outsourcing. And so this is something that we're keenly aware of and thinking about and certainly part of our long-term thesis on the business to support both growth and being a catalyst for those banks to do outsourcing as well as increasing our density and participation in our retail footprint.
If I could ask a specific question on DRS. Is this -- are you finding this service is more valuable or less valuable to customers based on their business models as sort of like, I don't know, a stand-alone big box as opposed to an area like in an airport where retail is clustered or a mall because you've had a couple of marquee customers that you can talk about that sort of fit that latter bucket.
Yes. I'd say it's more about the idea around disclosure, Tobey, and customers being willing to talk about it, to be honest, because we are seeing DRS, we don't get to highlight all of our DRS wins as we've talked about previously in retail. But we're seeing strong value propositions, everything from the SMB mom-and-pop coffee shops all the way up to the big box guys. And many of those solutions can look similar maybe in the middle of that bulge. But when you get to the smaller or you get to the larger, they're certainly more sophisticated and can be more complex.
We think the complexity is helpful for us because we can solve some of those problems with more technology and an integrated service model. And then on the low end, on the smaller customers, we're able to, frankly, lower our cost to serve to allow us to provide a better value proposition as we build more density. And as I think about one of the other big opportunities, and we talked about that last earnings call about the Atleos integration is building out more density across our network that again is going to lower our cost to serve and ultimately be able to provide better value propositions to customers, both small and large, but ultimately provide a much more compelling solution than they're able to either self-perform today or even than what we can deliver today from a cost perspective. So again, those benefits continue to accrue, and we think there's a definite network effect that we can create as we build out that density.
If I can ask one last one, and I'll get back in the queue. With respect to cash, conversion from EBITDA. You had some numbers in your recent filing that gave us a look at what your expectations are for a number of years for stand-alone Brink's. But maybe you could touch on the opportunity or what the combination with NCR Atleos does to the opportunity to increase that conversion over time.
Yes. Tobey, it's Kurt. Maybe I'll jump in here. I would say, first of all, just from a profitability perspective, certainly an opportunity there. The synergies will help on flow-through for sure. Then you go below the OP line and below the EBITDA line, we definitely see opportunities in terms of capital efficiency from both the CapEx and working capital perspective, and we talked a little bit about it. I mean we have to obviously develop that further together, but certainly see opportunities there to drive increased conversion on that.
I think the other area, Tobey, is that we think about, and frankly, we're seeing benefit now in our business as we really ramped up our efforts in and around global supply chain and procurement is getting better payment terms as we operate as one large enterprise versus 52 countries. And we've talked about that transformation that's been going on in the business for some time. We're really starting to see some of those benefits. And we think that putting together 2 companies of similar size and scale and purchasing power would only help that in the future as we think about managing payment terms, managing our balance sheet, managing our receivables in the same way as we think about common customers.
So the working capital benefits that we're achieving -- sorry, improvements we're achieving now. By the way, Atleos is doing a pretty good job of that, too. We think only together can we really drive not only kind of in contract changes, but also just efficiencies in our systems and better follow-up and operational execution on credit and collections and payment terms.
And maybe I just might add that's a good point, Mark, one other thing. If you look at cash interest and cash taxes, there'll be opportunities there as well with the combined firm. And so that's another final area.
The next question comes from Tim Mulrooney with William Blair.
This is Sam on for Tim. Maybe I'll pivot away from some of the AMS/DRS questions, some good ones were already asked and ask more about your Latin America business actually. So this year, you'll be moving past some of the Argentina inflation impacts for the first time in a while. So how are you thinking about the growth rate and margins for this business? And then I noticed a competitor of yours just made a pretty sizable acquisition in Peru. Curious how this might impact the level of competition you face in this region.
Yes. Thanks. Good to hear from you. First of all, I'll address the Peru acquisition. We're not in Peru. Actually, we were in Peru years ago and actually exited the business -- exited the country. But for us, we're -- we're very comfortable with the geography we have today. And as we've talked about previously, our strategic focus is really about moving further up the stack around DRS and AMS more around technology and service efficiency versus really expanded geography. Now we will have some expanded geography or we expect to have some expanded geography post the NCR acquisition that will allow us to kind of reassess what resources we have in which markets and how best to optimize cost and the supply chain there.
But for us, again, this wasn't much of a strategic lever for us. We didn't have any cost synergies there because we don't have any businesses there to combine. And really, the market is pretty isolated from our perspective. So we don't see that competitive pressure, let's say, in the region from this acquisition, particularly. More generally, we love Latin America from a fundamental perspective, high cash usage in these markets, good margins. We have good businesses, good leadership teams. And as you point out, Argentina is a place as you look at the kind of FX trends here in the last 6 months as we get to the back half of the year at current rates.
Argentina is not a headwind at all. And so from an FX perspective. So that's really interesting because it's a good business for us. We have a good position down there, and it's good margins. And so as we think about going forward, it's going to be less noise and effectively will be something that investors will be able to get a better look at on an apples-to-apples basis without as much noise. The other thing that we think about also down there is the AMS market. It's a huge ATM market, and we're in the biggest markets down there in Brazil, Argentina and Mexico, Colombia, Chile.
And certainly, there's activity already going on down there. We've talked about it, but there's a lot left to go. And the banks down there are pretty sophisticated operators. They are relatively consolidated. And so the discussions are progressing well, we have several active networks down there as well as active pilots with existing banks that we're working to convert here in '27 and '28 -- I'm sorry, '26 and '27.
Sam, just I'd add too. I mean, you should expect the margins to get better sequentially, and that's what we're seeing.
Yes. I think it's -- and Sam, just of note, as you look at our Q1 performance and Q2 guide, this $10 million to $11 million of EBITDA that's above -- was above the midpoint of our guide of our framework should flow through to the balance of the year. And that's -- part of it is this LatAm margin improvements. And as you can see, the EBITDA margins are benefiting in Q1 kind of over our midpoint at the high end of our guide for a couple of reasons. One is the continued AMS/DRS mix benefits, but also we had a strong quarter in BGS. And our Global Services business, I mentioned on the call, given the -- all the volatility in the Middle East that we've seen, there's been a lot of movement of precious metals around the world.
And in and out of all of the big financial centers around the world, that likely -- in our guide, we assume that's going to continue into Q2. And as we look out to second half, these markets are volatile. Hopefully, we'll have peace by then and things will settle down. And we're not assuming the kind of that same performance in the back half that we've seen in Q1.
So if you think about progression, Sam, it's very typical to look at kind of a 45% of our EBITDA in the first half, 55% in the second half is very typical for us. We're a little bit ahead of it this year. And as Mark said, we see that flowing through for the year. So I think good start.
Got it. Super, very helpful. And I was going to ask about BGS next, but you already beat me to it there. So maybe I can leverage this next question and maybe address fuel prices. I think I know that your contracts generally have fuel surcharges that are rent into them. But I guess I'd be curious if that's actually captured the full impact that you're seeing right now. And if there's any impact to margins that you might expect for the remainder of the year from this?
Yes. So we've been -- you know it well. We've been pretty good at ensuring that fuel doesn't necessarily impact us over the long term adversely. Of course, those indexes and changes, some are monthly, some are quarterly, some are biannually, whatever that we recapture that. But if anything, maybe it could be delayed a quarter. But those -- the fuel prices were in -- we had them in Q1, and you can see our performance, again, was way above our midpoint and at the high end of the guide. So we think that our teams have been pretty good at covering that and ensuring that our pricing discipline maintains those margins.
If we go forward we see that likely to be a blip. Some of the things we -- some of the stuff we've seen around the world, we heard about some of these interruptions and fuel and so forth. We haven't experienced that. We haven't experienced it in anything other than episodically, let's say, okay, airports were closed in Dubai for a bit. But other than that, we really haven't had any real kind of structural supply impact and aren't expecting that going forward.
Yes. So in our guide and our framework contemplates that, Sam. So we've been good about covering it and still feel good about continuing to cover it.
Well, thanks. Listen, we appreciate everyone's time. I appreciate your support and interest in the company and look forward to speaking with you either next few days or when we're on the road at conferences coming up here in May and June. Have a great day.
Thank you. The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.
Brink's Company — Q1 2026 Earnings Call
Brink's Company — The Brink's Company, NCR Atleos Corporation - M&A Call
1. Management Discussion
Good day, and welcome to the Brink's acquisition of NCR Atleos. [Operator Instructions] Please note this event is being recorded. This call and the Q&A session that follows the call will contain forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from projected or estimated results. in particular, forward-looking financial information for the combined company is inherently uncertain due to a number of factors outside of Brink's and NCR Atleos' control.
Information regarding factors that could cause differences in actual results are available in today's press release and presentation and in Brink's and NCR Atleos' SEC filings. The information presented and discussed on the call is representative of today only. Brink's and NCR Atleos assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements. The call is copyrighted and may not be used without written permission from Brink's and NCR Atleos. I will now turn it over to your host, Jesse Jenkins, Vice President of Investor Relations. Mr. Jenkins, you may begin.
Thanks, and good afternoon. Here with me today are Brink's CEO and CFO, Mark Eubanks and Kurt McMaken as well as NCR Atleos President and CEO, [ Tim Oliver ]. This morning, a joint press release was issued and both companies filed 8-Ks with pertinent details of the proposed $6.6 billion acquisition of NCR Atleos by Brink's. The transaction is subject to the completion of customary closing conditions, including regulatory approvals and approval by Brink's and NCR Atleos shareholders.
Additional details, including risk factors related to the transaction can be found in these filings and on both companies' websites. This afternoon, both companies also reported fourth quarter and full year 2025 results on a GAAP and non-GAAP basis. Any reference to non-GAAP financial measures during this presentation are intended to provide investors with a supplemental comparison of Brink's operating results and trends for the periods presented.
Brink's believes these measures allow investors to better compare performance over time and to evaluate its performance using the same metrics as management. Reconciliation of Brink's non-GAAP results to its most comparable GAAP results are provided in its earnings release, the appendix of its earnings presentation and the related Form 8-K filing, each of which can be found on Brink's website.
While most of today's call will be focused on the transaction announcement, we and the NCR Atleos Investor Relations team will be happy to follow up with any questions related to earnings results. I will now turn the call over to Brink's CEO, Mark Eubanks.
Thanks, Jesse. Good afternoon, everyone. Before I speak to the exciting transaction we announced today, I'll briefly touch on the strong fourth quarter and full year 2025 results, which were at or above the midpoint of our guidance on all metrics. We delivered another year of meaningful strategic progress with strong organic growth from ATM Managed Services and Digital Retail Solutions while expanding our adjusted EBITDA margins by 40 basis points, and importantly, delivering $436 million of free cash flow.
Our normal detailed quarterly results presentation, including our Q1 2026 guidance and full year framework can be found on our investor website. As Jesse mentioned, we'll be happy to answer questions and provide additional details on our 2025 results and 2026 stand-alone guidance when we meet with analysts and investors in the coming days.
Moving on now to the news of the day. We're excited to announce that we've agreed to acquire NCR Atleos bringing together 2 complementary trusted and globally recognized financial technology infrastructure provider
[Audio Gap]
To unlock productivity and improve service quality under a managed services or full outsourcing model. We'll be able to solve any ATM owners' needs through a better optimized cost structure that will provide compelling value propositions for customers as they look for outsourced solutions for increasingly complex and costly systems and processes. As we already see in Europe, many governments are exploring options to require banks to maintain cash access points.
Our ability to reduce cost of ownership for banks without sacrificing service quality is vital to ensuring cash access for end consumers in an increasingly digital world. Through existing global partnerships and service relationships with many leading financial institutions, we believe our combined capabilities will drive further penetration into the growing and evolving addressable market as more ATM owners look to reduce costs by capitalizing on higher agencies.
On to Slide 7. Beyond direct ATM management for financial institutions, I want to take a minute to outline how this combination supports our growth aspirations in the retail channel as well. We both believe this acquisition presents significant opportunity for our DRS business, Today, Brink's and NCR Atleos, both manage ATMs inside of retail locations around the globe.
For NCR Atleos, this often involves a subcontracted provider performing cash logistics services. And for customers, this often involves multiple vendor relationships to manage different types of services within the store. Often, when we service these locations, we see many other vendors operating in and around the payments ecosystem, from ATM replenishment to cash coordination at the register to first and second line maintenance of devices. This is obviously inefficient and costly for our retail customers and ultimately, the consumer.
Our combined business will be able to safely and securely streamline the entire cash and payments ecosystem, ultimately optimizing our cost structure. With a digitally connected DRS device and a fully monitored ATM, we can reduce our trips to the store while improving service levels and cash flow for the retailer. This is a win-win for retailers across the globe who are continuing to look for automation and reduce costs for all their payment systems. This is also a win for consumers that want a convenient access to cash and ubiquitous acceptance of cash at retail stores.
While this level of optimization will take time, the addition of NCR Atleos capabilities pulls forward our ability to capture this potential market. Beyond this compelling retail opportunity, bringing NCR Atleos large globally installed base of over 600,000 ATMs into our broader network will help densify our routes and improve our labor and capital efficiency around the world.
Route optimization has been a priority for Brinks, especially in North America, where we were able to increase revenue per vehicle by 14% in 2025. Building off its early success. This combination will increase the density of our networks and enable us to continue to improve productivity and asset utilization. This productivity will allow us to offer a more competitive offering across nearly any business, moving us into previously untapped markets from large retailers down to small- and medium-sized businesses.
Now I'd like to turn this over to Kurt to talk about some of the economics of the deal.
Thanks, Mark. Beyond the strategic merits Mark spoke about, we expect significant financial benefits from the combination. In terms of synergies, we expect to add $200 million of annual run rate synergies to the business. Our goal is to fully realize those synergies within 3 years, and we expect that the cost to capture will be roughly 1:1.
We have identified 3 major buckets of these synergies with over half coming from duplicative SG&A costs. Our service network and infrastructure overlap is expected to produce approximately $70 million in savings and combining our purchasing power should contribute another $25 million in procurement savings.
It's important to note that while we expect some level of additional revenue synergies from cross-selling like the integrated AMS DRS offering, Mark just mentioned, none of those synergies have been factored into the expected synergies discussed in the presentation.
Over the course of the next 12 months before closing, we will continue to work to refine these estimates and explore other potential avenues of savings. We're well positioned to unlock substantial value that sets the foundation for consistent long-term value creation. That value creation begins with the impressive cash generation potential the combination provides.
In 2025, the 2 companies generated $762 million in free cash flow converting 42% of the combined adjusted EBITDA. Both companies have capital efficiency and working capital optimization initiatives that are driving consistent improvements in cash generation.
Combined, we will be able to continue to make progress in these areas. Looking out over the next few years, we have line of sight to over $1 billion of annual free cash flow, creating significant capital flexibility to execute our capital allocation priorities of investing in the business, reducing debt and returning capital to shareholders.
We expect this acquisition to take about 12 months to complete. During this period, both companies will shift capital allocation towards net debt reduction working towards a targeted range of 2 to 3x adjusted EBITDA. With the amount of cash expected to be generated by the combined company, we don't expect it to take long to reach our targeted debt levels by the end of 2027.
Once we have achieved our targeted [ debt ] range, we fully expect to pivot capital allocation to shareholder returns. Before I turn it back to Mark, a quick review of the transaction details. We are purchasing NCR Atleos for an implied value of approximately $6.6 billion, composed of $30 per share in cash consideration and 0.1574 shares of Brink's for each common share of NCR Atleos. The cash component of the deal will be funded by cash on hand as well as a fully committed bridge facility, which we have already secured.
As previously discussed, we expect to recognize $200 million in annual run rate synergies within 3 years, and this deal is expected to be at least 35% accretive to EPS in year 1. As I mentioned, we are targeting for the combined company's net debt leverage to return to 2 to 3x by the end of 2027. The transaction is expected to close in the first quarter of 2027, subject to customary closing conditions, including regulatory approval and shareholder approvals from both companies.
Before we open the line for questions, let me send it back to Mark for some closing remarks.
Thanks, Kurt. As I close our prepared remarks, I wanted to emphasize how this deal accelerates our previously stated value creation priorities. Our first focus is to grow our business organically. While this transaction adds significant inorganic growth, we expect the combination to further solidify our long-term organic growth framework in our already fast-growing AMS and DRS customer offerings.
In ATM Managed Services, we will deliver improved capabilities across every touch point in the ATM ownership value chain, allowing us to further advance customer outsourcing opportunities and drive higher revenue per ATM as we progress our customers up the value chain to more efficient service options.
On the DRS side, we see additional opportunities to grow our business with a holistic cash payment ecosystem that integrates our AMS and DRS capabilities. From a profit perspective, we expect our margins will benefit from the $200 million in annual run rate synergies, but we will also see considerable productivity improvements as we optimize our routes within denser networks and cross-training technicians to provide multiple services to customers.
We also expect to continue ongoing lean waste elimination programs at both companies as our existing continuous improvement initiatives continue to mature. We previously discussed the accelerated free cash flow potential of the business.
Beyond the additional cash from synergies, we still see many opportunities with inventory, receivables and payables to continue to shorten the cash cycle as we move towards combined free cash flow generation of approximately $1 billion.
And finally, all these efforts drive our overall goal of maximizing shareholder value. With net leverage expected to reduce below 3x by the end of 2027, we will be able to quickly pivot capital allocation toward capital returns as we find accretive ways to deploy our cash that generates lasting value for our expanded shareholder base. As you can see, this deal is complementary to our stated value creation objectives and fits nicely within our previously discussed capital allocation framework, with a quick delevering into our targeted range in less than a year.
With sound strategic logic that will enable growth, cost efficiencies and compelling deal economics, we expect this deal to advance our value creation efforts as we move forward together. And with that, we're happy to now take your questions. Operator, please open the line.
[Operator Instructions] The first question comes from George Tong with Goldman Sachs.
2. Question Answer
You mentioned you expect $200 million cost synergies from this transaction. Can you provide more details on where you expect this $200 million to come from, how much from routing, from the fleet, from overhead? Just some additional details would be great.
Yes, sure. Thanks for the question. I think this deal -- the financial returns sort of speak for themselves and the synergies are certainly part of that. But this is really a strategy first story and a number of story second. The combination accelerates really what already what we're doing in AMS and DRS and allows us to build on that momentum as we build out these complementary capabilities up and down the value chain.
I think it also highlights the area of focus here that we're strengthening the highest return growth area in our business is AMS DRS. And this is mainly focused on the fact that we continue to see more and more opportunities with both banks and retailers looking to outsource cash management, either through ATM outsourcing or through I think the synergies are just on top of that and clearly help us underwrite the value creation levers across this -- across the deal and across the economics. Maybe, Kurt, you want to talk about the synergy specifically.
Yes, George. So look, first of all, the $200 million in annual run rate synergies we're expecting to be hitting in the third year. Look, we have a lot of confidence in. We've really worked hard to develop these together. As you can see in the presentation, a little bit over $100 million in the SG&A area. And we really see that very attractive to be able to get to those pretty readily and easily.
The next biggest component is in our shared networks. The reality is we do have a lot of shared network resources that we have the ability to really optimize together and then procurement and just really realizing the benefits of much larger and leverage spend across both of our organizations. So we feel really good about it. And we actually feel like we'll have the opportunity to even go find more as we continue to work together between the organizations.
Yes. I think, George, just to add on to that, the good news is this $200 million we're talking about is really all within our control. We don't need cooperation from the market or from any outside to deliver, it's all based sort of on cost. I think the other opportunity that Kurt alluded to or mentioned is any commercial opportunities or revenue synergies, these are all upside. They're not required for the financial case and are not included in the returns that we've shown.
That's very helpful. And related to what you just mentioned around revenue synergies, is there a way to frame the potential upside from revenue synergies? You mentioned the strategic rationale of the combination is really what's driving this transaction. And you also mentioned that the organic growth of the combined company is going to remain around mid-single digits, which was Brink's original longer-term growth target. So is there room for that mid-single-digit organic growth to move higher because of the strong strategic benefits of this combination.
Yes. Look, Good, let me jump in here and Mark can also add in. But I'd say, first and foremost, we do see this as really being able to broaden our capabilities, both sides to serve our customers better. And in that sense, we see the opportunity to really drive great organic growth between us. We have not included any sales synergies in the modeling, as we've mentioned.
But we do see really the opportunity to bring value across both of our customer bases to drive higher levels of growth. So I think there's really good opportunity there.
Yes. I would just say George, we think about the mid-single-digit framework would be across both businesses as you look out forward, and that's probably still the right way to think about it. I'd say that the upsides to those are certainly come down to the pace at which we see more bank outsourcing either with managed services or complete ATM as a service as the NCR team has continued to grow.
And if you think about our business, as you know, those are -- our AMS DRS is growing in the 20% range, their ATM as a Service, growing 30%, 40% range. So these are certainly the higher growth areas. Obviously, as those numbers get bigger, it's harder to make that percentage continue to go as the [ law ] of large numbers catches up with you. But listen, this -- what we're looking out in front of us is this TAM, this total addressable market that includes bank outsourcing that has yet to really start in earnest.
But as I mentioned earlier, we continue to see all over the world, and you've heard from us, I think you've heard from them, in really all regions, we're seeing customers either making the decisions or at least doing proof of concepts and exploring this idea of trying to get to an integrated solution that ultimately drives lower total cost of ownership as well as higher reliability and availability.
The next question comes from Tim Mulrooney with William Blair.
You got Sam on for Tim. A lot of unpack, big acquisition, a great end of the year, and a good outlook. I guess I'll probably sit with the acquisitions here, but maybe just to kind of help frame it, and I think you were talking about this a little bit, Mark already -- you've seen acceleration in your DRS AMS business. You're expecting mid- to high teens growth for this year. When you think about this business with NCR Atleos, what is the kind of long-term growth that you're expecting this business to generate?
Yes, it's hard to put a finger on it, Sam. But I think what we said previously around our DRS AMS outlook is we think this mid-single-digit -- mid-double-digit organic growth can continue for the foreseeable future and certainly in the short and medium term. that number is starting to get pretty big and we still continue to see good growth rates. And I know, again, the Atleos guys are as well. We think about that in terms of, yes, we're able to deliver those growth rates as separate companies.
And the vision is how much more efficient, how much more better can we operate as an integrated company, orchestrating all of those capabilities across the value chain to really delight customers and differentiate ourselves to really start to instigate that ATM outsourcing, bank outsourcing that we know exists. And at some point, will come.
And I think it's -- for us, I won't say it's a wait-and-see only because we've got big appetite to grow. And we think this acquisition puts us in the best place to be able to not only accept the outsourcing [ has happened ], but maybe even become more of a catalyst to enable it.
Got it. That's helpful. You touched on this a little bit too already, but maybe we could dive a bit further into this. But when we think about the service offering you already have with AMS. What does NCR Atleos bring to the AMS business that perhaps you didn't have before or had less of? And then what are you hoping AMS to bring to the Atleos customer base that maybe they weren't as strong in.
Yes, interesting. Tim mentioned on the call that we've been customers or suppliers of each other back and forth in various places around the world. And when you have that sort of arm's length relationship between suppliers or with customers independently, inherently creates inefficiencies. And today, for the most part, most customers manage all of these activities along the value chain that I laid out in the slide there, independently, sort of in a hub-and-spoke way versus being a horizontal delivery.
And we just think that coordination across allows us to be more efficient, be better for our customers and ultimately deliver the outcomes that our customers want, which is a simplified solution of a high reliability distribution network.
And that's -- we think that can continue. If you think about what they offer versus marrying up to us, certainly, their software capability, the monitoring capability, the innovation around hardware, both traditional cash-only dispensing ATMs as well as recyclers as that's become more popular and marry that up against our broad and wide logistics network and cash handling expertise, it really puts us in a in a strong position to offer a great value proposition to customers. And if you think about all those activities across the value chain, there are very few that 1 of our 2 companies can offer.
No. Yes, that's very helpful. And I can definitely see that. If I could squeeze 1 more in then. You talked about the DRS business, kind of the opportunity there. NCR has a pretty big retail footprint. Is there any way to help size or just think about the cross-sell opportunity to your DRS business that this acquisition would bring?
It's certainly something that we would -- would think about as part of the integration, Sam. It's probably not something that we've got sized up yet. As you can imagine, these things sort of happen with the small group. But certainly, they've got 80,000 owned ATMs across their utility network. They manage quite a few more indirectly for others. And they're in really good blue-chip retail locations and whether that's in big box retail or pharmacies or electronics and consumer supplies, malls. These are all areas where we're already there as well.
And the interesting thing is, and we've seen this with our AMS business when we acquired [ PAI ] a while back, we actually saw our own people going to the same location to service different devices. And so if you think about minimizing truck rolls and cross-training our field engineers and technicians to be able to do not only the cash loading or not only first-line maintenance on ATMs, but being able to extend that across to DRS devices, cross-train our people to be able to handle multiple activities on the job site.
So again, yes, it's going to streamline for us, but more importantly, it allows us to get to customer sites faster, solve any problems or interruptions they might have to create a higher reliability, high fidelity network.
Sam, I might just add. I mean we know -- as Mark pointed out, while we don't know all the specifics yet. We do know that they are in locations that we aren't today, so it provides opportunity and vice versa, and not only in the U.S. but also globally. So yes, we think really good opportunity there for the DRS side of the business.
The next question comes from Tobey Sommer with Truist Securities.
Thanks. When you assess marrying the services of yours with NCR Atleos a specific hardware. How do you look at and assess the major risks and the positives versus your prior sort of agnostic approach to hardware?
Yes. Listen, Tim, I think at the end of the -- sorry, it's Toby, sorry, at the end of the day, I think customers want an outcome. They're not necessarily -- they don't just want Brink's. They don't just want NCR. They don't just want ABC companies. At the end of the day, they want an outcome. And when we think about ATM Managed Services, this is -- we're in the outcome business, and that's about creating reliability and fidelity in the system.
And DRS, the same, about creating security and access. And so we don't think there's a necessarily a conflict here. Certainly, there will be areas where we have customers that we're serving today already that don't have full NCR fleet, and I'm sure there are NCR customers that don't use Brink's. So we think in some ways, there could be opportunities for cross-selling. There's also -- but most importantly, I think there's going to be an opportunity for us to have real conversations about outcomes for customers, which ultimately they want. I think anytime there's change, there could be some risk.
But for now, I think we've got the right teams, the right relationships and certainly, we're going to treat our customers fairly and communicate with our customers in the right way in advance of all of this. So that's the best way to answer it.
Appreciate that.
You asked about risk a little bit, maybe I didn't hit that. I think the risk for us is probably just around distraction. And making sure our teams don't get distracted with this deal and with this combination. We've got about 12 months, we think, to close this thing. And between here and there, we've got a -- we both have very important performing businesses right now that we need to go execute. And because of that, we've ring-fenced our our teams, we've ring-fenced the day-to-day operations from the deal team and certainly we'll be using our integration management office and staff to really focus on integration to free up our day-to-day business leaders to run the business and deliver on the commitments we have already. And I know NCR Atleos would be doing the same thing.
I'm interested if we could explore a little bit more how you may be able to accelerate AMS, DRS growth post combination. Is there an example that you could give of sort of why the combined entity would maybe be able to spur and the outsourcing of a bank or sort of tackle that white space in the retail customer set?
Yes, sure. I think this is where -- an example would be both retail and in banks, where we already have strong customer relationships, they have a strong customer relationship that allows us to not have to maybe being concerned about any of the conflict that maybe you mentioned earlier about the hardware versus 1 vendor or another, I think that's the first place.
But I also think that there as we think about post acquisition once we close, having our commercial team able to raise up the opportunities and the discussions maybe that are more nascent, in each of those markets. And frankly, having 1 integrated solution would allow us there to derisk in fact, the the solution for customers. And this is something that we continue to deal with.
Even today, with the success we're having is we need partners along the value chain to help us because we don't have all of the capabilities. And of course, ATMs and ATM software and management software, these are things that we have to partner with to deliver to customers. And this will certainly simplify that and make it easier to have that discussion.
Toby, it's Kurt. Just to add on to 1 thing kind of specific. We have applications today where we have a DRS device in a store location where there's an ATM, right? And that key cash ecosystem provides a very compelling customer offerings for a retailer. As we said, there are locations we know where that doesn't exist, but it solves the same set of problems for a customer. And so this combination really allows for getting into that customer solutioning even much quicker on a bigger scale.
This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Mark Eubanks for any closing remarks.
Yes. Thank you, everyone, for joining the call today. We look forward to speaking to you in our one-on-ones and maybe on the road. And again, I just want to thank our teams and the NCR Atleos team for all the work they've done to get us to this point and look forward to the years ahead.
The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.
Brink's Company — The Brink's Company, NCR Atleos Corporation - M&A Call
Brink's Company — Q3 2025 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Good morning, and welcome to The Brink's Third Quarter 2025 Earnings Presentation. [Operator Instructions] Please note, this event is being recorded.
This call and the Q&A session will contain forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from projected or estimated results. Information regarding factors that could cause such differences are available in today's press release and presentation and in the company's SEC filings. The information presented and discussed on this call is representative of today only. Brink's assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements. The call is copyrighted and may not be used without written permission from Brink's.
I will now turn it over to your host, Jesse Jenkins, Vice President of Investor Relations. Mr. Jenkins, you may begin.
Thanks, and good morning. Here with me today are CEO, Mark Eubanks; and CFO, Kurt McMaken. This morning, Brink's reported third quarter 2025 results on a GAAP, non-GAAP, and constant currency basis. Most of our comments today will be focused on our non-GAAP results. These non-GAAP financial measures are intended to provide investors with a supplemental comparison of our operating results and trends for the periods presented.
We believe these measures allow investors to better compare performance over time and to evaluate our performance using the same metrics as management. Reconciliations of non-GAAP results to their most comparable GAAP results are provided in the press release, the appendix of the presentation, and our 8-K filings, all of which can be found on our website.
I will now turn the call over to Brink's CEO, Mark Eubanks.
Thanks, Jesse, and good morning, everyone.
Starting on Slide 3. Brink delivered another solid quarter of mid-single-digit organic revenue growth. The 5% total company organic growth included an acceleration from Q2 to 19% for ATM Managed Services and Digital Retail Solutions or AMS/DRS as we continue to make progress expanding into large and growing markets.
For the second consecutive quarter, we delivered record Q3 EBITDA and operating profit margins, driven by strong productivity, the benefits of AMS/DRS revenue mix, and continued pricing discipline. Third quarter EBITDA margins were 19%, up 180 basis points from the prior year. The improvement was highlighted by 320 basis points of expansion in North America as we make progress driving a balanced agenda around growth in AMS/DRS and cost productivity with the Brink's Business System. With AMS/DRS now accounting for 28% of total revenue in the quarter and more productivity initiatives underway, we are expecting continued margin progress going forward.
Cash generation also continues to improve. In Q3, we delivered $175 million of free cash flow, a year-over-year increase of 30%. We continue to shorten our cash cycle and deliver capital efficiency across our asset base with vehicle counts down again this quarter and DSOs improved by 5 days.
Looking at the quarter in total, we delivered on our guidance commitments with performance exceeding the midpoint of our communicated ranges for the quarter. Organic growth remains healthy in the mid-single digits with AMS/DRS accelerating quarter-over-quarter. We continue to make steady progress improving profitability as we drive lasting structural changes to the way we operate on both the front lines and in the back office. Supported by this strong momentum, we are passing through our Q3 midpoint outperformance to the full year and affirming our previously increased full year framework. Kurt will have more details on the guidance at the end of the presentation.
Turning to Slide 4. You can see how our year-to-date performance supports our value creation strategy. First, we're focused on delivering organic growth primarily from our higher-margin subscription-based services of AMS and DRS. We are tracking in line with our full year framework with organic growth of 5% for the total company and 18% AMS/DRS year-to-date. The revenue growth and the execution of productivity enhancements have driven EBITDA margin expansion of 40 basis points year-to-date with acceleration in the second half. For the second consecutive quarter, we've achieved record EBITDA margins in both North America and Europe.
Free cash flow conversion is also improving. Year-to-date free cash flow has increased to 78% and trailing 12-month conversion has improved to 50% of adjusted EBITDA. Supported by growth in AMS/DRS acceptance in the marketplace, we are making structural changes in the business that we believe will continue to pay dividends for years to come. Our cash cycle continues to shorten with year-to-date DSO improvement of 5 days. We are also improving capital efficiency as we reduce our CapEx needs and leverage our network more efficiently.
And finally, we are focused on maximizing value for our shareholders through disciplined capital allocation. This year, capital has primarily been allocated to our share repurchase program, where we've utilized $154 million year-to-date to repurchase approximately 1.7 million shares at roughly $89 per share. Even with the share repurchases, we have moved our net debt-to-EBITDA leverage ratio to 2.9x in the third quarter, within our targeted range of 2x to 3x. We expect to stay within the range through year-end and remain on track to allocate at least 50% of our total free cash flow towards shareholder returns in the full year. So far, we have made meaningful progress against these value creation drivers this year.
Turning to Slide 5. You can see the progression of our revenue mix towards AMS and DRS over the last several years. As a reminder, we split our business into 2 main customer offerings, cash and valuables management or CVM and AMS/DRS. Our CVM business includes the traditional parts of the business like point-to-point cash logistics, money processing, and our international shipping business, we call Global Services, while AMS includes revenue from our ATM managed services business as well as digital retail solutions.
With full year organic growth in AMS and DRS trending towards the high end of our mid to high teens growth framework, we are increasing our mix expectations to between 27% and 28% of total revenue by year-end. While AMS/DRS is now 27% of our total revenue on a trailing 12-month basis, we are still in the early stages of penetrating this large and growing total addressable market. As we've previously discussed, unvended retail locations and ATM outsourcing opportunities represent a 2x to 3x market expansion opportunity.
Looking closer at each of the customer offerings, organic growth in CVM remain consistent with our expectations. Growth was driven by good pricing discipline and Global Services performing similarly to the second quarter. As a reminder, CVM organic growth includes the conversion of existing customers over to AMS/DRS. AMS/DRS accelerated from 16% organic growth in Q2 to 19% this quarter. Acceleration occurred in both AMS and DRS individually and was balanced across geographic segments.
In DRS, our pipelines remain robust, and we see consistent strength in verticals like pharmacies, gas stations, C-stores, quick-serve restaurants as well as fashion and jewelry verticals. In AMS, we have completed the onboarding of several key accounts and are at full revenue run rates with QT and RaceTrac here in North America and Sainsbury's in Europe with several additional customers set to be onboarded in the fourth quarter in LATAM and the Middle East.
Turning to Slide 6. I thought it would be helpful to show a map of our current AMS footprint. The highlighted 51 countries represent Brink's presence across the globe with those in light blue representing countries with existing AMS agreements. We've also added a select few customer logos to illustrate our presence in these markets. This map had almost no AMS presence less than 4 years ago. Leveraging our existing customer relationships with banks and retailers as well as our acquired and organically built capabilities in AMS, we've been able to expand this market to what it is today.
As we've previously said, this is just the beginning. While there are some impressive customers already in our portfolio, we are still in the early stages of this opportunity. As we consistently deliver reliable service with a total lower cost of ownership for customers, we see penetration opportunities both in the countries we already serve as well as the other geographies where we still have a presence. The current penetration rate for ATM outsourcing is still low. As we've previously discussed, there is an opportunity for the current addressable market to expand by 2x to 3x as more financial institutions make the shift to this win-win value proposition. This growing opportunity, coupled with an equally compelling retail backdrop in DRS provides confidence in our strategy for years to come.
On Slide 7, I'll provide a quick update on our margin improvement journey in the key North America segment. The margin progression begins on the top line, where we've improved the revenue quality by shifting to higher-margin AMS/DRS. On a trailing 12-month basis, AMS/DRS now represents 31% of revenue in this segment. Since 2022, this business line has grown by 33% with strong conversion rates and steady new customer growth driving continued market penetration. Other areas of margin enhancement include our pricing discipline and the deployment of waste elimination initiatives through the Brink's Business System. These improvements are coming through the P&L with less direct labor expenses and lower fuel consumption.
Even with the healthy top line growth, we are seeing consistent vehicle and employee count reductions and our safety performance continues to improve to record levels. In fact, since 2023, our total recordable incident rate or TRIR is down 33%. There are many studies that indicate positive correlation between higher safety records and improved shareholder returns. These returns happen because a safer work environment enables higher employee engagement, resulting in higher labor productivity, better service quality, resulting in higher customer satisfaction, which all ultimately leads to higher growth and profits. As we continue to shift to AMS/DRS and increase productivity, we are targeting to be at least 20% EBITDA margin in this segment over the midterm.
Before I hand it over to Kurt to go through the details of the quarter, I want to thank our team for executing against our strategy. We delivered another solid quarter while meeting our commitments and advancing our strategy. Growth in the AMS/DRS business lines accelerated. Our profit margins expanded to record highs and our cash generation continues to improve. Supported by large and growing markets, ample productivity opportunities and consistent execution, I remain confident we have the right team and strategy in place. I'm excited for the future and encouraged about how far we've come.
And with that, I'll hand it to Kurt to discuss the financials, and I'll come back for Q&A. Kurt?
Thanks, Mark.
I'll begin on Slide 9 with a look at the quarter. Revenue of over $1.3 billion, increased 6% with 5% organic growth and a 1% tailwind from foreign currency. Adjusted EBITDA was up 17% to $253 million, and operating profit was up 24%. Record profit margins slightly ahead of our expectations were driven by productivity, AMS/DRS mix benefits, and pricing discipline. Earnings per share of $2.08 was up 28%, driven by strong profit growth and the benefits of our share repurchase program.
As Mark mentioned earlier, free cash flow was strong this quarter with improvement in the cash cycle on accounts receivable, accounts payable, and improved capital efficiency as we continue to shift our business to less capital-intensive AMS/DRS offerings. Trailing 12 months free cash flow is up over $200 million with conversion of 50%. We've been more balanced in our pacing of cash generation compared to the prior year and are still expecting to deliver our full year framework target of between 40% and 45% conversion.
On Slide 10, organic revenue growth was $59 million, with most of the growth coming from higher-margin subscription-based AMS and DRS. It's important to note that CVM growth was and will continue to reflect AMS and DRS customer conversions. In Q3, we estimate this to be roughly 2 to 3 points of growth in CVM.
Moving to the right side of the page, organic revenue growth of $59 million became EBITDA growth of $34 million for an incremental margin of 58%. Currency changes increased revenue by 1% or $13 million, with favorability in the lower-margin euro and British pound, partially offset by currency devaluation from the Argentine peso. The FX flow-through to EBITDA was approximately 7.5% due to the geographic mix of currency. Despite this, we are pleased with our performance in the quarter with our total incremental profit conversion of 47%.
Moving to Slide 11, starting on the left. Operating profit was up $37 million to $188 million with a record margin of 14.1% on strong productivity in line of business revenue mix. Interest expense was flat year-over-year at $63 million, which is also roughly in line with our expectation for Q4. Tax expense was $35 million in the quarter, representing an effective tax rate of just under 28%, slightly lower than the Q2 rate. Income from continuing operations was $88 million.
Walking back up to adjusted EBITDA, depreciation and amortization was $62 million, primarily reflecting increased depreciation from growth in AMS and DRS equipment. Stock comp and other was $6 million in the quarter, and we still expect a slight decrease to stock-based compensation over the full year to below $30 million.
In total, third quarter adjusted EBITDA of $253 million and margin of 19% was above the midpoint of our guidance for the quarter with strong execution on AMS/DRS growth and productivity.
Let's move to Slide 12 to discuss our capital allocation framework. We have a healthy menu of organic OpEx investments that we are making to drive AMS and DRS growth. These high-return investments remain our first call for capital. Next, we reduced leverage at quarter end to 2.9x net debt-to-EBITDA within our targeted range of 2x to 3x and slightly ahead of our expectations for the quarter.
Our main use of capital this year continues to be shareholder returns, primarily through our share repurchase program. We have repurchased approximately 1.7 million shares year-to-date at an average price of just over $89 per share. We plan to remain active through the end of the year, and we remain on track to return at least 50% of our full year free cash flow to shareholders. We have been pleased with the results of our share repurchase program, which delivered EPS accretion of $0.08 in the quarter and $0.33 year-to-date.
And finally, on M&A, our posture on deals is consistent. We have a full pipeline and continue to explore accretive opportunities that have a strong strategic fit, attractive returns, and align with our broader capital allocation framework. Potential deals would most likely help us further penetrate the large and growing addressable AMS and DRS markets. An example of this was the KAL deal we discussed last quarter. By following this framework, we are committed to allocating capital in ways that will compound cash flow in the future and ultimately enhance long-term shareholder value.
Moving to the guidance on Slide 13. In the fourth quarter, we expect revenue of $1.355 billion at the midpoint of our range, reflecting organic growth in the mid-single digits. Using current spot rates, FX is expected to be a year-on-year tailwind of 1 to 2 points. The organic revenue guidance assumes AMS/DRS growth at the high end of our framework. Adjusted EBITDA is expected to be between $267 million and $287 million, and EPS is expected to be between $2.28 and $2.68.
Next to this Q4 guidance, you can see what this implies for the full year relative to our full year framework. On the right side of the slide, our organic growth framework remains consistent from the beginning of the year. We are still expecting to deliver mid-single-digit total organic growth, supported by mid to high teens organic growth for AMS/DRS. EBITDA margins are expected to expand between 30 and 50 basis points with conversion of EBITDA to free cash flow of between 40% and 45%.
We remain on track to return more than half of that free cash flow to our shareholders through our share repurchase plan and dividend. Supported by the growth and margin expansion we have already seen year-to-date, we are confident in our outlook for the balance of the year.
And with that, we're happy to now take your questions. Operator, please open the line.
[Operator Instructions] Our first question today comes from George Tong of Goldman Sachs.
2. Question Answer
You increased your full year growth outlook for AMS/DRS to be in the high teens. Can you elaborate on the client traction you're seeing in both AMS and DRS that drove you to increase your outlook?
Sure. George, this is Mark. Yes, we had a good quarter this year -- this quarter, not just on sales, as you can see, the progression continue, but also in the pipeline. And that gives us good visibility into Q4 and really into first half of next year. We're seeing it both in AMS and DRS. Both are growing equally on their own right, and we'll continue to penetrate across all regions. I think you can see in the deck this quarter, we showed just sort of a brief overview of our AMS footprint. And we're certainly not fully penetrated in those markets. But as you can see, we've got green shoots all over the globe across almost all of our footprint today with more opportunities to go.
On the DRS side, that pipeline continues to be very healthy. And one of the things that we talked about last quarter was the amount of conversions from CIT and retail to DRS. Last quarter, we were about 1/4 of our signings were and growth were coming from conversions of our CIT customers. That has actually accelerated into Q3. About 1/3 of our global DRS signings are coming from traditional customers. So we like the progress that not only we're seeing with our existing customer base, but also we continue to tap the unvended markets.
As we think about sort of going around the globe though, this -- I'd say this growth is becoming more even as we're seeing good progress both in North America as well as the other 3 regions. And you can see our -- even though our penetration in Europe is relatively high compared to the other regions, we continue to see good growth there. We'll see Latin America and rest of world continue to pick up pace as well, particularly when you look in Latin America, both Brazil and Mexico continue to really perform for us. That's something that, as you can see, it's one of our least penetrated regions, but has some of the biggest opportunities, very cash-intensive economies, large ATM networks, large bank footprints, but also a very, very large small retail distribution as well for the unvended market. This is where we see this 2x to 3x TAM continuing to be an opportunity into the future.
And then turning to your CVM business. The revenue performance relatively flat organically in the quarter, and it slowed a bit from about 1% growth in the prior quarter. Can you talk more about trends you're seeing here and factors that can either drive a reacceleration in CVM growth or perhaps further moderation in organic performance?
Certainly, the big thing there as we continue to convert, as I mentioned, to AMS/DRS, accelerating from 25% to basically 33%. That probably accounted for 2 to 3 points of organic headwind on the CVM business. And the only other piece of the CVM business really is our Global Services business, which really continued to perform in line with Q2 globally, which is sort of mid-single digits.
Our next question comes from Tim Mulrooney of William Blair.
Just first of all, on AMS/DRS, I'm wondering if you could talk about some of the things that you're doing internally to drive continued growth in that business, which is growing faster than what we were expecting this year. And I know you're winning new programs, but any details you could provide, I guess, without getting into competitive issues around maybe like…
Sure.
…are you adding additional channels, Mark? Any like adjustments to incentives, either in the field or the corporate side? Like what's really helping drive this next leg of growth, I guess, is what I'm asking?
Yes. That's a good question, Tim. We've talked briefly around this historically about how we changed our incentive comp plan. And we did that really 2 years ago, we changed our incentive comp plan for our maybe top, let's say, 100 people in the company that had a big part of their annual incentive plan were tied to DRS/AMS revenue growth. We've actually expanded that now to more than 1,000 people in the company. Basically, anyone who's got a management incentive bonus is tied to AMS/DRS growth rates. Actually, we have it weighted higher than total revenue growth to make sure that everyone understands the focus. I think that's sort of at the top level. And I think that's what's helping us and our leadership team across the globe really execute the strategy that we want, which is, again, more AMS/DRS, more flexible network, leveraging kind of the full capacity using technology to be able to do that.
On the ground, though, it's also important that our sales teams have similar incentives. And so if you think about an incentive comp plan for local salespeople, that has been, let's say, traditionally, for Brink's, a very local decision and something that local management was sort of left to do. We've started to globally align those sales incentive plans across the globe to focus predominantly on AMS/DRS and helping our customers through this journey from traditional CIT, whether it's the banking or retail segments to move to this more managed services environment. So that's been helping us make progress. This year, we're going to take another step there and further align more specificity across all of our incentive comp plans for our sales teams globally to focus on those 2 things.
In fact, we have some leadership -- local leadership that has taken this even to a higher level. We have some regions where our leadership team has made the decision to either discount commission plans or not even provide commission plans for salespeople that aren't selling DRS/AMS that might be selling traditional services. And again, not being punitive, but more leading our teams to help lead our customers to this value-accretive value proposition for both customers and for Brink's.
I think the last thing you asked about was channels. This is an area that is a big change for Brink's. Historically, we've sold direct with all of our salespeople by being direct Brink's employees selling directly to financial institutions and retailers and so forth. We've actually begun to evolve that to work with channel partners. And this is evolving in all regions. And whether this is a commission sales force or it's a value-added reseller or another channel partner, we have white label agreements with some banks to sell DRS to their retail customers. So we really are trying to evolve this process to, again, help everyone in the channel make the cash ecosystem more efficient and feel a lot more inclusive in the rest of the payments ecosystem, whether that's at DRS or in the cash distribution and deposit networks.
That's good detail. Thanks for outlining the incentives and the channels helping drive that good growth. The other thing I wanted to ask you about was the North America margins. I mean, just incredible this quarter. You're up 300-plus bps. I wonder how to think about that, I guess, from a longer-term perspective, like what the margin potential is in that business? Because I see some of your other segments and where they are, but I don't actually know if that's comparable because Latin America has some pretty different dynamics and so does the rest of the world with the BGS business. So how would you have investors -- how would you frame for investors the margin potential of that business in North America? I would ask incremental margins because that's always an easy way for analysts to kind of level set, but you're decapitalizing the business. So I don't even know if that's like the right way to think about it incremental. So I'll just -- I'll leave it there, but curious how to frame the margin either from a medium-term or longer-term perspective in North America, given the momentum that you're seeing right now?
Sure. That's a good question, Tim. I would say, if you look at the margin progression, let's just say Q3, first of all, yes, it prints 370 bps. If you remember, we had 330 bps. If you remember, we had a loss last year during this time frame that makes it a little bit of an easier comp, but still great performance from a margin expansion perspective, particularly when you look across the years. So if you look at this chart, you can see sort of steady upward progression in the business. And this is driven by really 3 big things. The first and foremost has been our AMS/DRS mix improvement across the business. That's certainly been helpful. Those are accretive margins and certainly allow us, as you mentioned, to decapitalize the business and make the business more dynamic.
The second has been a more disciplined pricing posture that we've taken that maybe historically we had not. And we've been very disciplined since coming out of the pandemic, frankly to, just to make sure that we're not only covering our costs, but also improving our margins and getting the right value with customers on both sides.
And then lastly, really has been our operational execution. And I have to applaud our North America team that really has been working hard and showing real improvements operationally, both in service quality, service timeliness and then, of course, I mentioned safety. And any time you see safety improvements, that's an indicative measure of how well we're running the business or how well the business is being run, let's say. And we think that that's a good one for investors to understand that we've got a good foundation to continue to go forward.
Our incremental margins are going to be anywhere from 20% to 30%, Tim. That's kind of how we think about it going forward. But there's not really a -- we don't think it's really an artificial ceiling here in front of us. And we think there's still more room to go. I mentioned the 20% EBITDA margins in the midterm. To me, that's just an interim checkpoint of where we want to take the business because if you know this, and it's not without -- it's in the public domain, we actually have a gap in North America with one of our other traditional competitors, which gives me lots of confidence that we still got room to go and still run the business better, much less with this new business model on top that is decapitalized, that's more flexible, more dynamic and more value accretive for customers.
Our next question comes from Tobey Sommer of Truist.
I wanted to ask about the cash conversion. What are your current thoughts on midterm goals for free cash conversion from EBITDA? And as part of your answer, could you describe the DSO improvement drivers, maybe mix shift versus other more discrete actions that you've undertaken?
Yes. Tobey, it's Kurt. Why don't I take this one, just kind of walk through it a little bit. First of all, we feel good about our framework in terms of conversion, 40% to 45%, not only in the near-term, but going forward, we think that's a good thing to look towards. The reality is we've been working hard on making sure that we're creating cash throughout the year and focusing on all aspects of that generation throughout the year. And so specifically to your DSO question, there's a couple of things to really I think focus in on.
One is the mix of the business, where if you look at AMS/DRS, those are both subscription-based business models, and they absolutely have a very favorable DSO profile for us. So as we continue to grow that, that is a real positive for our DSO improvement. We were better by 5 days, as we mentioned. I mean the other is, again, we -- this gets back to a comment Mark made on incentives. We really have a broad-based incentive now across our leadership base focusing on free cash flow delivery. And so therefore, that delivery really, really is spread out around the world and people focused on it. So that's number two.
The third I'd say is just maybe really working collections harder than traditionally has been done, just getting in and grinding through it, I think is also a factor. The other thing I'd mention too you didn't mention on accounts payable DPOs, but that has also been a real focus for us. We were better, improved by 4 days at the end of the third quarter as well. So that's the second piece.
And then finally, I'd say on the CapEx and the capital intensity side of things, the AMS and DRS is a less capital-intensive business. We've been decapitalizing, taking trucks out, for example, Mark has mentioned that in the past. So all of these levers are really working towards the free cash flow generation conversion factor supporting it.
Geographic growth was pretty well balanced organically in the quarter on a year-over-year basis. What geos may have higher or lower trajectories going forward? And maybe if you could provide a driver for why there could be a more wider dispersion going forward, if you think that's the case?
Yes, sure. In fact, I don't think that's the case, Tobey. I think we've got opportunities to continue at this pace in all regions. Of course, there's going to be opportunities up and down. You think about the Rest of the World segment, particularly given the fact that half of it is BGS. Volatility, obviously, in that part of the world makes a big difference. And so that's why you saw 9% in Q1 and sort of mid-single digits moderating here in 2 and 3. So maybe that's one area. But to be honest, we still feel like we've got good runway with all of the regions, particularly when you consider the unvended retail markets in one vein.
And the second is the installed base of the banks. And so as our outlook -- as we think about outlook for AMS and we think about bank outsourcing, there's no region that is over penetrated or has already matured in that way. And we think our ability to capture that when those markets are turned over the next few years, we think there's good opportunity, again, in a big TAM over the next -- well, for good organic growth across all 4 regions.
I think we think about sort of looking forward in the next year, maybe in the shorter term, there's nothing we've seen from a customer and market perspective that would change our mind on the organic outlook. We think this framework, obviously, we'll put our guidance out in -- after Q4. But there's nothing that says we wouldn't be able to continue this same framework of mid-single-digit organic growth is mid to high teens AMS/DRS, 30 to 50 bps of EBITDA margin.
And just thinking about what's happened this year and relative to the FX in H1, we had a big headwind and slight tailwind in H2, probably going to see something similar if you look forward into [ '21 ], a little more of a benefit early in the year in H1 and then, obviously, not much benefit if you snap today's -- snap the line on today's FX rates in H2. So we feel like we've got a pretty good setup for next year. And again, healthy pipelines, as I mentioned, both in AMS/DRS that continue to accelerate as we shift our incentives, as we improve our execution, as we build out more product offerings for our customers and then ultimately, how we execute in the field that continues to improve and get better and just expanding with more channel partners and more at bats with more customers is just going to fuel this opportunity.
So nothing that I would say would slow down the organic opportunity. Kurt, anything maybe about '26 or anything else you?
Yes. Just to be clear on the FX, Tobey, I think Mark's comment there, I mean if you snap the line today using rates today, you would expect to see a slight tailwind in '26 and for the year and then more weighted towards the first half is what Mark was -- just to be clear on that. But the other thing I'd say is that as we look at -- and Mark was talking about opportunities, if we think about how we're really trying to run the business, we definitely continue to see -- we see opportunities in the area of getting a lot more efficient in our SG&A area. So we're continuing to work at this, and we'll continue to make progress. But as Mark has described, how we're running the business differently than how we have in the past, we expect that we're going to continue to really find efficiencies to support our margin expansion.
Yes. I think this is part of just globalizing the business, Tobey. And as you think about our strategy, it's multipronged. And certainly, it's around growth and customer loyalty. It's around innovation around technology and customer offerings, operational excellence and people. But part and parcel to all of that is sort of how we run the business day-to-day in the back-office as well, whether that's across the big functions in finance, IT, HR, sourcing, procurement, real estate, those are all things that historically for 165 years, the company has run sort of independently and disparate around the world. We've been evolving that. We certainly have a strategy around doing more things similar. And we think there's still more back-office sort of fixed cost productivity left in the business that we plan to start getting after and more so in '26 and beyond. So there's -- yes, there's good organic growth. Yes, there's good product mix, but we think we've still got some good productivity left in sort of the fixed base of the business that we can wring out.
I'd like to sneak one more in and just because I'm not asking about AMS deals, doesn't mean I don't like the growth. The bank consolidation, what's your view on it here on a net basis? I'm sure there are puts and takes on either side and -- but approvals from regulators are the fastest they've been since 1990 at 4 months and some deals have started to be announced. So if this ends up being something that lasts for a few years, how should investors think about that and its implications for your business?
Yes. Good question, Tobey. It's something we obviously are watching very closely. And these most recent announcements have certainly been in our customer base. And so trying to see where those things land. We think with our AMS solutions, this likely becomes an opportunity just given the fact that we have the ability to, first and foremost, provide an offering that is unique, we think in the marketplace. It's not commoditized, and we have a unique offering and a unique value proposition to do that.
The second is for those consolidators, we provide them an opportunity to create real cost synergy as well as they think about streamlining their network, their branch footprint, their infrastructure to, again, help through that synergy to sort of wring out the cost and productivity that exists. And we talked about this previously about AMS in general, we've seen earlier in early years, the last few years, we've seen more opportunities outside of North America around AMS, just given the fact that the banking footprints were already consolidated and that this an ATM network productivity opportunity really was pretty high on the list of improving profit margins, whereas in the U.S., more bank consolidation and sort of redundant public company costs were -- or infrastructure and compliance costs were more of the productivity lever.
We actually are starting to see the AMS discussions more frequently in North America. I don't know if the 2 things are tied to this consolidation or not, but we certainly think there's going to be opportunities for us there. I think in the short-term, there is certainly footprint consolidations that would happen to our traditional business potentially, where if a bank buys another bank, they've got 2 branches on the same corner, maybe we lose a location there. That certainly could happen. But as we think of -- we -- well, back up, we are thinking about this strategically and making sure that we're also partnered with the right consolidators and making sure that we're serving those being consolidated also in a healthy way that allows us to maintain those customer relationships in the event there is a merger. So I'd say net-net, Tobey, we think this probably is good just based on the AMS opportunity for long-term.
Sure. Great. Well, listen, thanks for joining us, everyone. We appreciate your continued interest in Brink's, and we look forward to speaking with you all soon, whether on the phone or on the road. Have a great day.
The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.
Brink's Company — Q3 2025 Earnings Call
Financial data from Brink's Company
Revenue
Revenue is the sum of all sales generated by a company, e.g. for its products or services.
Revenue (TTM) metric explainedDirect Costs
Direct costs are the costs incurred directly in connection with the manufacture of the product or service.
Gross Profit
Gross Profit indicates how much of the revenue remains in the company after deducting direct production costs. If the percentage share of sales is calculated, this is referred to as the gross margin.
Gross Profit metric explainedSelling and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) include all expenses for marketing and sales as well as the general administration of the company.
Research and Development Expense
Research and development costs (R&D) provide information on how much the company invests in the research and development of its products. The costs are particularly interesting as a percentage of revenue and in comparison to direct competitors.
EBITDA
EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization) is the company's earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. The EBITDA margin is calculated as a percentage of sales.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation represents reductions in the value of the company's assets (e.g. due to wear and tear on machinery).
EBIT (Operating Income)
EBIT (Earnings Before Interest and Taxes) is the company's profit before interest and taxes, also known as the operating income. The EBIT Margin is calculated as a percentage of sales at
.
Net Profit
Net Profit represents the profit or loss after deduction of all costs.
Net Profit metric explainedStocksGuide Premium
| Jun '26 |
+/-
%
|
||
| Revenue | 5,481 5,481 |
8%
8%
100%
|
|
| - Direct Costs | 4,033 4,033 |
6%
6%
74%
|
|
| Gross Profit | 1,449 1,449 |
14%
14%
26%
|
|
| - Selling and Administrative Expenses | 889 889 |
10%
10%
16%
|
|
| - Research and Development Expense | - - |
-
-
|
|
| EBITDA | 883 883 |
18%
18%
16%
|
|
| - Depreciation and Amortization | 319 319 |
15%
15%
6%
|
|
| EBIT (Operating Income) EBIT | 564 564 |
19%
19%
10%
|
|
| Net Profit | 181 181 |
11%
11%
3%
|
|
In millions USD.
Don't miss a Thing! We will send you all news about Brink's Company directly to your mailbox free of charge.
If you wish, we will send you an e-mail every morning with news on stocks of your portfolios.
Brink's Company Stock News
Company Profile
The Brink's Co. provides secure logistics and cash management services. It operates through the following segments: North America, South America and Rest of World. Its logistics and security solutions include cash-in-transit, ATM replenishment & maintenance, and cash management & payment services, such as vault outsourcing, money processing, intelligent safe services, and international transportation of valuables. The company was founded by Perry Brink and Fidelia Brink on May 5, 1859 and is headquartered in Richmond, VA.
StocksGuide Premium
| Head office | United States |
| CEO | Mr. Eubanks |
| Employees | 64,500 |
| Founded | 1859 |
| Website | investors.brinks.com |


