Formycon Stock price
Is Formycon a Top Scorer Stock based on the Dividend, High-Growth-Investing or Leverman Strategy?
As a Free StocksGuide user, you can view scores for all 9,127 stocks worldwide.
StocksGuide Premium
StocksGuide Unlimited
Key metrics
📘 Market Capitalization
📈 What is it?
Market capitalization shows how much a company is currently worth on the stock market.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It helps classify companies by size (Large, Mid, Small Cap) and indicates their market presence and relative stability.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Large-cap companies tend to be more stable, often pay dividends, but may grow more slowly.
- Smaller firms may offer higher growth potential but come with more volatility.
- Market capitalization is a useful indicator of company size — but not a measure of whether a stock is undervalued or overvalued.
📘 Enterprise Value (EV)
📈 What is it?
Enterprise Value represents the total cost to acquire a company — including its debt and excluding its cash reserves.
🧮 How is it calculated?
(= Market Cap + Net Debt)
🏛️ Why is it important?
EV gives a more complete picture of a company's value than market cap alone and is used in key valuation ratios like EV/FCF or EV/Sales.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Enterprise Value shows the true cost of buying a company, including all financial obligations.
- It is more accurate than just looking at market cap, especially when comparing companies with different levels of debt or cash.
- Professional investors prefer EV-based multiples because they better reflect the company’s full financial footprint.
📘 Net Debt
📈 What is it?
Net Debt shows how much debt remains after subtracting a company’s available cash reserves.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It indicates how dependent a company is on borrowed money and how easily it can service its debt in the short term.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Low or negative net debt signals financial strength and flexibility.
- Companies with strong cash positions are better positioned in crises.
- High net debt increases financial risk — especially in environments with rising interest rates or economic downturns.
📘 Cash
📈 What is it?
Cash represents all liquid assets a company can access immediately — including cash, bank deposits, and short-term investments.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It reflects a company’s financial flexibility and resilience — enabling investments, buybacks, or buffer in downturns.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A strong cash position means greater room for maneuver and crisis resistance.
- Cash-rich companies can invest, pay down debt, or repurchase shares.
- But excess idle cash might indicate a lack of growth opportunities.
📘 Shares Outstanding
📈 What is it?
Shares outstanding represent the total number of a company’s shares currently held by investors — excluding treasury stock.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It’s the basis for key metrics like Earnings Per Share (EPS), Market Capitalization, or the Price/Earnings ratio (P/E).
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Fewer shares in circulation typically increase earnings per share — making each share more valuable.
- Share buybacks reduce the number of shares and boost per-share metrics.
- Issuing new shares does the opposite — diluting shareholder value and lowering per-share figures.
📘 Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E)
📈 What is it?
The P/E ratio shows how many times a company's earnings per share are reflected in its current share price — in other words, how "expensive" the stock appears relative to its profits.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
The P/E ratio is one of the most widely used valuation metrics. It helps investors assess whether a stock appears cheap or expensive compared to its earnings power.
🧮 Calculation
📊 P/E (TTM) = Based on earnings from the last 12 months (Trailing Twelve Months):🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low P/E may indicate undervaluation — or signal underlying issues.
- A high P/E may reflect strong growth expectations — or an overvalued stock.
📘 Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S)
📈 What is it?
The P/S ratio shows how much investors are paying for $1 of the company’s revenue – regardless of profitability.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
P/S is especially useful for evaluating growth companies or businesses not yet profitable. It reflects how the market values the company’s sales.
🧮 Calculation
Market Cap = €334.73m | Revenue (TTM) = €61.24m
Market Cap = €334.73m | Estimated Revenue = €73.17m
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low P/S may indicate undervaluation — or low profitability.
- A high P/S can reflect strong growth expectations — or excessive optimism.
- Especially helpful when evaluating companies where profits are low, volatile, or negative.
📘 Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales)
📈 What is it?
EV/Sales shows how much investors are paying for $1 of revenue — considering not just equity, but also debt and cash. It’s the capital structure–adjusted version of the P/S ratio.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It’s ideal for comparing companies with different levels of debt. It reflects a company's true cost relative to its revenue.
🧮 Calculation
Enterprise Value = €291.41m | Revenue (TTM) = €61.24m
Enterprise Value = €291.41m | Forward Revenue = €73.17m
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- EV/Sales allows for capital structure–neutral company comparisons.
- A lower ratio may indicate undervaluation; a higher one may signal strong growth expectations or overvaluation.
- Especially helpful when evaluating high-growth companies with low or negative earnings.
📘 Enterprise Value to Free Cash Flow (EV/FCF)
📈 What is it?
EV/FCF shows how many years it would take for a company to "pay back" its enterprise value using its free cash flow.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It focuses on real cash generation, ignoring accounting noise — ideal for assessing profitability and value based on liquidity, not earnings.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low EV/FCF may signal undervaluation and strong cash generation.
- A high EV/FCF might reflect weak recent cash flow or aggressive growth expectations.
- Best suited for stable, mature businesses with predictable free cash flows.
📘 Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B)
📈 What is it?
The P/B ratio compares a company’s market value to its book value — showing how much investors are paying for each dollar of net assets.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
P/B is commonly used for asset-heavy industries like banks or industrials. It helps assess whether a stock is trading above or below its net asset value.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A P/B below 1 may signal undervaluation — or weak profitability.
- A P/B above 1 implies the market expects future value creation (e.g., brand, IP, growth).
- Best used for companies with tangible assets and strong balance sheets.
📘 Equity Ratio
📈 What is it?
The equity ratio indicates what portion of a company’s total assets is financed by shareholders’ equity – in other words, how much it relies on its own capital.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
A high equity ratio reflects financial strength and stability, especially during downturns. It’s a key indicator of a company’s solvency and long-term risk profile.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Companies with high equity ratios are generally more resilient and less dependent on external debt.
- Low equity ratios can signal higher risk or aggressive financial strategies.
- Important: Always assess the equity ratio in combination with the return on equity (ROE). This shows not just how stable the company is – but also how efficiently it uses shareholder capital.
📘 Return on Equity (ROE)
📈 What is it?
Return on equity (ROE) shows how efficiently a company uses its shareholders’ equity to generate profit. In other words: how much net income is earned per dollar of equity.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
ROE is a core profitability metric. It helps investors understand whether a company delivers attractive returns on the capital provided by its shareholders.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high ROE indicates that the company is using its capital efficiently and profitably.
- It’s especially meaningful for capital-intensive businesses or firms with high equity bases.
- Important: A very high ROE can also result from high debt levels – always interpret it alongside the equity ratio to assess financial health.
📘 Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
📈 What is it?
ROCE measures how efficiently a company generates profits from its total capital – including both equity and interest-bearing debt.
🧮 How is it calculated?
It evaluates the return on all capital employed, regardless of how it’s financed.
🏛️ Why is it important?
ROCE is ideal for comparing companies with different financing structures. It shows how well management uses capital to create value for both shareholders and creditors.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high ROCE means the company uses its capital efficiently – regardless of whether it's funded by debt or equity.
- The higher the ROCE compared to peers, the more value the company creates with its invested capital.
- Especially relevant for capital-intensive sectors like industrials, energy, or infrastructure.
📘 Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
📈 What is it?
ROIC measures how efficiently a company generates returns from the capital invested in its core operations – regardless of whether the capital comes from equity or debt.
🧮 How is it calculated?
- NOPAT = Net Operating Profit After Taxes
- Invested Capital = Operating assets minus non-interest-bearing liabilities
🏛️ Why is it important?
ROIC is one of the most accurate indicators of capital efficiency. Unlike return on equity, it is not distorted by leverage and shows how much value is created for all capital providers.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high ROIC shows how effectively a company uses the capital that is truly invested in its core operations.
- Unlike ROCE, ROIC focuses only on the capital that is actively used to run the business – and that requires a return (i.e. interest-bearing).
- Especially useful when comparing companies with large amounts of excess cash or non-interest-bearing liabilities – giving a more realistic picture of capital efficiency.
📘 Leverage Ratio (Debt-to-Equity)
📈 What is it?
The leverage ratio indicates how much a company relies on interest-bearing debt (such as loans and bonds) relative to its shareholders’ equity.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
This ratio helps assess a company’s financial structure and risk profile. High leverage can enhance returns – but also increases exposure to interest rate changes and financial stress.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A low leverage ratio signals financial strength and independence.
- A higher ratio can improve returns in good times but increases risk during downturns or rising interest rate periods.
- 👉 Always interpret in the context of industry, capital intensity, and interest rate environment.
📘 Revenue
📈 What is it?
Revenue shows how much a company earns in total from selling its products and services – the gross income before any costs are deducted.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Revenue is one of the key figures to assess a company’s size, market position, and growth potential.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Growing revenue indicates rising demand and can be an early signal of future earnings growth.
- Comparing actual and expected revenue reveals trends in the market environment and analyst sentiment.
- Note: Strong revenue alone isn’t enough – margins and profitability matter just as much.
📘 EBITDA
📈 What is it?
EBITDA stands for “Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization.” It reflects a company’s operating profit before the effects of financing, taxes, and accounting depreciation.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
EBITDA is widely used to evaluate a company’s operating performance – especially across capital-intensive sectors or international comparisons.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high or growing EBITDA indicates strong operational profitability – independent of taxes, interest, or accounting methods.
- It’s especially useful for comparing companies across sectors or geographies.
- Important: EBITDA is not a net income figure – it excludes key costs like depreciation and interest.
📘 EBIT
📈 What is it?
EBIT stands for “Earnings Before Interest and Taxes.” It reflects a company’s operating profit after depreciation, but before interest and tax expenses.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
EBIT is a core profitability metric that shows how well the company performs in its main business operations – independent of capital structure and tax environment.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high EBIT indicates strong profitability from the company’s core business – before financial and tax effects.
- It allows better comparison between companies with different debt levels or tax structures.
- Compared to EBITDA, EBIT already accounts for depreciation and reflects capital intensity more clearly.
📘 Net Income
📈 What is it?
Net income is the company’s total profit – the amount left after all expenses, taxes, interest, and depreciation have been deducted.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Net income is the most comprehensive measure of a company’s profitability – showing how much actual profit remains after all business and financing costs.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Growing net income indicates that the company is managing all of its costs efficiently.
- It directly influences valuation metrics like P/E ratio and the company’s dividend capacity.
- Over time, net income trends reveal how resilient and profitable the business model really is.
📘 Free Cash Flow (FCF)
📈 What is it?
Free Cash Flow shows how much actual cash remains after a company covers its operating expenses and capital expenditures.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
FCF reflects a company’s real financial strength – regardless of accounting profits. It shows how much flexibility a company has for dividends, share buybacks, or debt reduction.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- High free cash flow means the company generates real, usable cash – independent of reported net income.
- It’s often the most reliable base for sustainable dividends and buybacks.
- Declining FCF can be an early warning sign – even when profits appear stable.
📘 Revenue Growth
📈 What is it?
Revenue growth shows how much a company’s sales have changed compared to the previous year – both on a trailing basis (TTM) and based on forward projections.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Forward = (Expected revenue ÷ Revenue in prior year − 1) × 100
Forward growth is based on analyst estimates for the current fiscal year.
🏛️ Why is it important?
Rising revenue signals growing demand, business expansion, and market share gains – especially important for growth-oriented companies.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Growth is the engine of long-term value creation – especially in tech and growth sectors.
- What matters is not just current growth, but its sustainability.
- Forward projections reflect whether analysts expect continued momentum – or a slowdown.
📘 EBITDA Growth
📈 What is it?
EBITDA growth shows how much a company’s operating profit (before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) has increased or decreased compared to the previous year.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Forward = (Expected EBITDA ÷ EBITDA from prior year − 1) × 100
The forward estimate is based on analyst projections for the current fiscal year.
🏛️ Why is it important?
Growing EBITDA indicates improving operational profitability – regardless of financing or accounting effects.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Strong EBITDA growth signals operational efficiency and scalability – especially during growth phases.
- EBITDA growth can be an early indicator of margin and earnings expansion – but should be assessed alongside revenue and EBIT.
📘 EBIT Growth
📈 What is it?
EBIT growth shows how much a company’s operating profit (after depreciation, but before interest and taxes) has increased compared to the previous year.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Forward = (Expected EBIT ÷ EBIT from prior year − 1) × 100
The forward estimate is based on analyst projections for the current fiscal year.
🏛️ Why is it important?
EBIT growth is a direct indicator of a company’s business performance – taking into account capital intensity through depreciation.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Rising EBIT signals improving operating profitability – even after accounting for depreciation.
- It’s especially important for evaluating companies with significant capital expenditures.
- Combined with revenue and EBITDA growth, EBIT growth provides a well-rounded view of operational progress.
📘 Net Income Growth
📈 What is it?
Net income growth shows how much a company’s bottom-line profit has increased or decreased compared to the previous year – both on a trailing basis (TTM) and based on analyst projections.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Forward = (Expected net income ÷ Net income from prior year − 1) × 100
The forward estimate reflects analysts’ expectations for the current fiscal year.
🏛️ Why is it important?
Net income is the ultimate measure of profitability. Growing net income signals stronger efficiency, cost control, and sustainable earnings power.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Stronger net income boosts valuation, dividend potential, and investor confidence.
- If profits stall while revenue grows, it may signal margin pressure.
📘 Free Cash Flow Growth
📈 What is it?
Free cash flow (FCF) growth shows how a company’s available cash – after covering operating expenses and capital expenditures – has changed compared to the previous year.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Free cash flow reflects real financial strength. Growing FCF indicates more flexibility for dividends, share buybacks, and reinvestment.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Declining FCF may point to rising investments, increasing costs, or weaker operating performance.
- Especially for dividend investors, FCF growth is critical – since dividends are paid from actual available cash.
- A negative trend isn't always bad, but it deserves closer attention.
📘 Gross Margin
📈 What is it?
Gross margin shows how much of a company’s revenue remains after deducting the direct costs of goods sold (like materials and production). It represents the company’s “raw profit” before fixed costs, taxes, and interest.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Or simply: Gross Margin = Gross Profit ÷ Revenue × 100
🏛️ Why is it important?
Gross margin indicates how efficiently a company can produce or procure what it sells. It is a key measure of product-level profitability and pricing power.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high gross margin suggests strong pricing power and efficient production.
- Falling margins may signal rising input costs or competitive pressure.
- Compared to peers, gross margin offers insights into the quality of a business model.
📘 EBITDA Margin
📈 What is it?
The EBITDA margin shows how much of a company’s revenue remains as operating profit before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization.It reflects operating efficiency without being distorted by financing or accounting factors.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
The EBITDA margin reveals how much operating income a company generates per dollar of revenue – independent of capital structure and tax effects.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high EBITDA margin reflects strong core profitability – before accounting distortions.
- It allows for effective comparisons across companies and sectors.
- A stable or growing margin signals efficient cost control and business scalability.
📘 EBIT Margin
📈 What is it?
The EBIT margin shows what percentage of revenue remains as operating profit after depreciation but before interest and taxes.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
The EBIT margin reflects a company’s core profitability while accounting for capital intensity (e.g. machinery, infrastructure). It’s especially useful for comparing businesses with different levels of depreciation.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high EBIT margin shows that the company remains efficient even after factoring in depreciation.
- It’s especially relevant for capital-intensive industries.
- Stable or rising EBIT margins over time are a strong indicator of pricing power and business quality.
📘 Net Margin
📈 What is it?
Net margin shows how much of a company’s revenue remains as bottom-line profit after deducting all costs, interest, taxes, and depreciation.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
Net margin reflects a company’s overall efficiency – across operations, financing, and taxation. It shows how much actual profit is generated from each dollar of revenue.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high net margin means the company is not only strong operationally but also manages financing and taxes efficiently.
- Peer comparisons reveal business quality and competitiveness.
- Declining margins despite revenue growth can be a red flag for rising costs or inefficiencies.
📘 Free cash flow margin
📈 What is it?
The free cash flow (FCF) margin shows how much of a company’s revenue remains as actual free cash after covering all operating expenses and capital expenditures.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
This margin reflects the true liquidity generated by the business – independent of accounting rules or depreciation. It’s especially relevant for dividends, buybacks, and reinvestment decisions.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high FCF margin means a company consistently generates strong cash flow.
- It’s a positive signal for financial stability and shareholder returns.
- The long-term trend is key – a declining margin may indicate rising investments or weakening operating efficiency.
📘 Earnings per share (EPS)
📈 What is it?
Earnings per Share (EPS) shows how much profit is attributable to a single share – and is one of the most important metrics for evaluating a company's performance.
🧮 How is it calculated?
The diluted share count reflects potential new shares that could be issued through options, convertible bonds, or other rights.
🏛️ Why is it important?
EPS is the basis for many key valuation metrics like P/E ratio, PEG ratio, or payout ratio. It enables comparisons of profitability across companies, regardless of their size.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- EPS captures per-share profitability and is especially useful for comparisons over time or with analyst estimates.
- Rising EPS may signal consistent growth or share buybacks.
- Important: Always use diluted EPS for more realistic valuations – especially in companies with stock-based compensation.
📘 Free cash flow per share (FCF per share)
📈 What is it?
Free Cash Flow per Share shows how much free cash flow a company generates per outstanding share – after investments, but before dividends or debt repayments.
🧮 How is it calculated?
Free cash flow is calculated as operating cash flow minus capital expenditures (CapEx).
🏛️ Why is it important?
FCF per Share reveals how much real cash is available per share – useful for dividends, buybacks, or reducing debt. Unlike net income, free cash flow is harder to manipulate and often seen as a more reliable metric.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- High FCF per share signals strong financial flexibility.
- It shows how much capital the company can effectively reinvest or return to shareholders.
- Particularly relevant for dividend payers and capital-efficient businesses.
📘 Short interest
📈 What is it?
Short interest indicates how many shares of a company are currently sold short – that is, borrowed and sold by investors who expect the price to decline.
🧮 How is it calculated?
It reflects the percentage of a company’s shares that are being shorted relative to the total shares available.
🏛️ Why is it important?
Short interest serves as a sentiment indicator: A high value may signal skepticism or bearish expectations – but also increases the potential for a short squeeze if prices rise unexpectedly.
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- Low short interest usually indicates market confidence in the company.
- High short interest can be a warning sign – or an opportunity if sentiment shifts.
- Especially relevant in volatile markets or ahead of key earnings releases.
📘 Employees
📈 What is it?
The employee count shows how many people a company employs worldwide – offering insights into its size, structure, and business model.
🧮 How is it calculated?
🏛️ Why is it important?
It helps assess operational scale, labor intensity, and cost structure. Combined with revenue and profit, it enables key metrics like revenue per employee or productivity.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high headcount can signal operational complexity – but also significant growth capacity.
- Revenue per employee is a key indicator of efficiency.
- Especially useful for comparing tech, industrial, or service-heavy companies.
📘 Turnover per employee
📈 What is it?
Revenue per employee indicates how much revenue a company generates on average per employee – a key measure of efficiency and productivity.
🧮 How is it calculated?
The employee count is typically taken from the most recent annual report.
🏛️ Why is it important?
This metric helps compare business models – especially between labor-intensive and technology-driven companies. A high value suggests automation, operational efficiency, or strong value creation per head.
🧮 Calculation
🎯 What does this mean for investors?
- A high revenue per employee indicates a scalable and margin-strong business model.
- A low figure may reflect labor-intensive operations or lower value-add.
- Especially helpful when comparing tech companies to industrial or service sectors.
Formycon Stock Analysis
Analyst Opinions
12 Analysts have issued a Formycon forecast:
Analyst Opinions
12 Analysts have issued a Formycon forecast:
Formycon Events
Past Events
|
AUG
12
Q2 2026 Earnings Call
about 2 months ago
|
|
MAY
28
Q1 2026 Earnings Call
4 months ago
|
|
APR
22
Q4 2025 Earnings Call
5 months ago
|
|
NOV
13
Q3 2025 Earnings Call
11 months ago
|
StocksGuide Free
Formycon — Q2 2026 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Formycon AG Earnings Call H1 2026. The conference will be recorded. [Operator Instructions] Let me now turn the floor over to your host, Dr. Stefan Glombitza.
Thank you, and good afternoon, good morning, and welcome to everyone joining us today. With the publication of our Q2 and H1 2026 results earlier today, we have reached another important milestone in our financial year. Before we turn to the details of the presentation, let me just highlight a few key takeaways that reflect the significant progress we have achieved in the first 6 months of this year.
First, our H1 financial performance shows substantial year-on-year growth, which is underscoring the disciplined execution of our strategy and confirming the momentum we built across our business. Just as a reminder, our business is not linear, and revenues are not equally distributed over the year. A particularly strong performance in Q4 last year underlined this seasonal pattern. Our H1 numbers 2026 are already much higher than last year's half year results. And looking ahead to the second half of '26, we expect further important milestones and a continued ramp-up. This reinforces our confidence in confirming our full year guidance and marks 2026 as an important year on our path forward to the sustainable EBITDA profitability.
Second, from an operational perspective, we are looking back to a very strong H1. Multiple key milestones have been successfully delivered across all 4 pillars of our FYB4Growth strategy, especially, of course, highlighted by the positive results from the FYB206 PK study and the successful completion of the trial. In the same period, we announced an operationally as well as strategically important manufacturing partnership, representing another significant step towards enhanced cost competitiveness for sustainable long-term value creation.
And third, on 15th of May, our commercial partners successfully launched our third pipeline product, FYB203 biosimilar to Eylea across several countries in Europe. Adding another product to our commercial platform is a testament of our ability to deliver against our pipeline.
Over the next 30 minutes, Enno Spillner and me will walk you through our presentation and give you a bit more flavor around the numbers. Together with Andreas Seidl, our CSO, we are prepared to address any remaining questions in the Q&A session. So let us begin with the presentation, and thank you again for listening in today.
As usual, before we begin, please note that our presentation and the Q&A both contain forward-looking statements that are subject to the usual risks and uncertainties as outlined in our disclaimer.
Biosimilars are a key growth driver for many relevant players in the off-patent industry. You heard that in many earnings calls. The detailed strategies to win might, of course, differ a bit between the companies. FYB4Growth is our road map and strategic compass to capture the significant biosimilars opportunity ahead.
Four core elements are building our guardrails to drive sustainable and profitable growth: global market diversification, a smart and selective portfolio, lean development, and uncompromising excellence and innovation. Across all 4 segments, several value-creating milestones have been achieved in the first 6 months of this year, and we envision more to come in the next quarters.
Pillar 1, geographic diversification. In H1, we continue to expand our global footprint through further targeted partnerships with local commercial specialists. As reflected in FYB201 launch with Biomm in Brazil, we could establish a new FYB202 partnership with Everex for several countries in the Lat Am region and the FYB206 license deal with Lotus earlier this year shall pave the way for access across multiple APAC markets as soon as the IP situation allows. Further license agreements are in continued negotiations and will step-by-step pave into our geographic diversification.
Smart portfolio management. Looking at our commercial portfolio, Cimerli has been reintroduced to the U.S. market in January and is gradually rebuilding market share. Nufymco, our second FYB201 product with partner Zydus, is going to complement our commercial offer in the U.S. The product recently received the reimbursement code, which is a key element in the preparation of a successful market uptake.
On May 15, we brought a third product from our development pipeline to markets and patients in Europe, marking another addition to our commercial portfolio. Based on the achieved IP settlement, there is a clear path forward for the U.S. in Q4. Building a strong and continuously growing pipeline is critical to our mission and to our business model. And that's why we are planning to enrich our development pipeline in the second half of 2026 by further program additions.
Credential matters, but trust is earned through execution. That's why operational excellence is embedded in our DNA. Our proven development and regulatory track record is complemented by differentiated innovations. And that's why advanced state-of-the-art device technologies are important to us. We could complement Fresenius Kabi's FYB202 Otulfi offering by an auto-injector, which has been introduced in European countries in H1 and is providing additional convenience to the benefit of patients and health care providers. The silicone oil-free ophthalmic prefilled syringe, which is used in FYB201, was, of course, also introduced with FYB203 in May this year.
Building on the pioneering Phase III waiver approach, we could confirm pharmacokinetic equivalence for FYB201 (sic) [ FYB206 ], our biosimilar versus the reference Keytruda in February. And in June, we successfully completed the clinical program. This data package is building a key element of the regulatory dossier, which our teams are preparing full steam. The strong progress in FYB206 creates first-mover opportunities and further strengthens our position as a trusted, high-performance partner in biosimilars.
In an increasingly competitive market, capital efficiency is essential. Lean development and cost-efficient manufacturing are at the heart of our FYB4Growth strategy, and that brings us to Pillar 4. By a comprehensive set of measures and initiatives, we could significantly reduce time lines and costs while maintaining the highest quality standards. Streamlined processes, smart concepts and intensified AI deployment helped us to reduce development time lines and costs for new programs by around 30% already, and we continue to work on that.
Our recently announced partnership with OneSource, a leading CDMO, marks another important step towards greater cost competitiveness and sustainable value creation. Going forward, we intend to further enhance this model through additional strategic partnerships, providing benefits to both our existing and our future pipeline. So in a nutshell, FYB4Growth remains our strategic compass and starts firmly delivering results.
Over the years, Formycon has established a highly credible development platform, enabling us to build a broad network of leading local and regional commercial partners across the globe. While Europe and U.S. remain core markets, we are expanding to high-growth regions with high unmet need for affordable biologic medicines. Through strong local and regional partnerships across MENA, Lat Am, APAC and Sub-Saharan Africa, we broadened patient access worldwide. We reduced the dependency on individual markets, and we strengthened our resilience against geopolitical and pricing volatility.
During the first half of '26, we further strengthened our international market reach. As you can see, depicted from our global road map, we expanded our network meanwhile to commercial partner number 14. This diversified partnership-driven commercialization model enables us to scale rapidly and capture growth opportunities worldwide while we maintain a disciplined capital allocation.
With that, I want to conclude my part of the presentation and hand over to our CFO, Enno Spillner, who has prepared a deep dive into the financial numbers of the first half of year 2026. Thank you for your continued attention.
Thank you, Stefan, and a warm welcome also from my side to everyone. Great pleasure having you here on the call today. And I do have also the pleasure of introducing our quite positive H1 2026 numbers to you.
Let's have a look at our P&L overview first. And revenues are gaining momentum and do show a very significant step-up versus H1 2025, increasing almost 3x revenue compared to last year's reporting period, clearly confirming our growth path. Transformation of our revenue structure continues, now with significantly more revenues coming in from efforts in the commercialization and commercializing of our products. Main revenue drivers continue to be FYB202 and FYB206, like in Q1 2026 also reported. This mainly includes milestones and royalties as major revenue drivers and I'll introduce the details to you on the coming slides.
In context of this, the significant revenue growth also increased our COGS, which is in the range of roughly 1/3 compared to H1 2025, and this was expected. Also here, we continue to recognize our transformation towards a more commercial-related setting, with significant parts of the COGS related to commercial efforts, like, for example, prepayments for supply, but also correlated with development work like, for instance, for FYB206. Details also here to follow on the next slides.
R&D expenses significantly reduced, especially with FYB208 having achieved the TPoS, technical proof of similarity, and therefore, respective costs being capitalized since the last fall 2025. Also, continued development costs for FYB206 are either recognized under COGS, as just mentioned, or being capitalized. I'll come back to that later.
Thus, currently, the most relevant asset from an R&D cost perspective is our asset FYB210. However, the remaining assets, FYB209 and FYB210, are still less cost-intense due to their earlier development stage. This triggers the overall R&D spend to be reduced accordingly, but please bear in mind that major parts of our R&D-alike activities are recognized under COGS or capitalized development expenditure. So in total, we continue to invest significantly into our pipeline and into our assets.
EBITDA made a big positive step forward and improved significantly by more than EUR 14 million, and we are not yet positive, but we are heading towards the right direction. This is consisting of different effects, of course. Revenues increased significantly, while COGS only show a moderate underproportional increase. R&D and other expenses have been noticeably reduced or kept stable, respectively. And continued cost control, active management of our structural costs and some beneficial effects like, for instance, sale of drug substance, helped to reduce our other expenses.
The group adjusted EBITDA amounted to minus EUR 6.9 million versus minus EUR 19.2 million in H1 2025. And this, again, is a significant EUR 12.3 million uplift against the comparable H1 2025 numbers. Since the adjusted EBITDA, in addition, only mirrors the performance of our joint venture, Bioeq AG, this slightly weaker performance of Bioeq AG mainly reflects the started relaunch of FYB201 sales and marketing activities in the U.S., triggering a negative contribution by our joint venture for the reporting period. This effect, by the way, we aim to turn around during H2 2026.
The capitalized development cost, of course, is not a P&L position, but belongs to the balance sheet. However, it partially reflects our continued investment into our advancing products, and this is why we wanted to show it here. In H1 2026, investments were mainly contributed to the further development activities of FYB208 and FYB206.
Please note, development costs for FYB206 continue to be capitalized partially, namely for the European part, where we don't have a partner yet, while the North American and rest of the world part is being covered under COGS in context of our latest partnerships with Zydus, MS Pharma and Lotus. The significant decrease of our investment total is mainly due to 2 facts: number one, FYB206 clinical trials were in full swing during H1 2025, while in H1 2026, this investment has mainly concluded; number two, the other significant part of this development cost is now shifted to COGS since it is associated to milestone payments from our partners for North America and the rest of world. Furthermore, FYB208 is not yet in the clinic and consequently only shows moderate development expenditures.
Let's take a closer look at the breakdown of our sales. We have added a new slide here for you, which shows the different revenue types, and we may also introduce that in our future reportings going forward. Recharges for development work on FYB201 and FYB203 stayed fairly stable, with remaining development work being conducted, especially for FYB203. Royalties more than doubled compared against H1 2025. However, market environment remains challenging, and we are not fully where we wanted to be with this revenue type. While growth of FYB202 royalties continues, we had expected a stronger momentum and thus better performance in H1.
Milestone recognition took a huge step to EUR 14.3 million. This effect mainly is attributable to deferred milestones, which we are recognizing for FYB206 in context of our partnering agreements for North America and for rest of world. This FYB206 performance simply didn't exist in H1 2025 since the new partnerships were only signed in late 2025 and early '26, respectively.
In addition, not to forget the FYB202 milestone, which we received as a one-off for our auto-injector approval in the European Union earlier this year. We mentioned that in our Q1 report already. A new class is revenue from supply management. This newly added category stands mainly in context with handling supply for our various partners under FYB202 and FYB203 agreements.
Now, reviewing our sales per product. Current development is clearly reflecting our changed revenue structure among the different products. Royalties for FYB201 now needs to reaccelerate after pausing marketing in the U.S. until end of 2025, which our U.S. partner, Sandoz, now is pushing again to rebuild U.S. market share, which, of course, may take some time to reaccelerate. We are optimistic seeing further acceleration during H2 2026.
Revenues for FYB202 more than tripled. This is a revenue mix consisting of royalties of the just mentioned one-off milestone and supply management. And while the royalty part currently still is developing modestly, we see positive commercial trends from our partners' activities, in particular in the U.S., in France, and in Germany, leaving us optimistic for the further course of the year 2026. We acknowledge that H1 could have shown some momentum, but the commercial indicators we are seeing support our expectations of stronger performance in H2. This is in line with the nonlinear nature and appearance of our business.
FYB203 remains stable with revenues mainly originating from recharges plus some supply management activities. And the new kid on the block is our revenue recognized in context of FYB206, derived from an upfront payment and deferred milestones from our FYB206 partnerships with Lotus, Zydus and MS Pharma. FYB206 currently stands for more than 40% of our total H1 revenues. In total, this effectively means a very substantial revenue increase, alongside a continued structural change of revenues for H1 2026, with a broad revenue mix from different products and different revenue types.
Also with regard to our COGS, we continue recognizing similar structural changes as just described in context of our revenues. COGS increased overall by EUR 6.4 million to EUR 28.8 million and thus clearly underproportional in relation to our revenue increase. Also here, FYB206 is the current gamechanger. This new item of EUR 11.5 million in COGS for FYB206 stands in direct context of our revenue recognition of our beforementioned milestones. The costs resulting from continued development and regulatory work to fulfill these milestone-based performance obligations for North America and rest of the world are recognized under COGS.
Operational COGS reduced a bit for FYB202. Furthermore, we continue recording a regular amortization of FYB202, which makes about EUR 10.5 million in H1 2026 versus EUR 12.5 million in H1 2025. Would we adjust for this accounting measure, we would be looking at operational COGS of approximately EUR 18.3 million for H1 '26 versus EUR 9.9 million in H1 '25. Please also bear in mind that the regular amortization of FYB202 considered under these COGS is neither EBITDA nor cash flow relevant. COGS for our recharge development efforts on FYB201 and FYB203 reduced once again for both products.
Let's review some group asset KPIs. Our balance sheet totals at a strong EUR 714 million. The EUR 26 million reduction mainly results from the net cash outflow and some prepayments. Equity is reduced by roughly EUR 13 million, or 3% accordingly, mainly due to the net result. And at the same time, our liabilities decreased slightly by net EUR 12 million, which is driven by 2 main effects. On the one hand side, trade payables have been reduced while contract liabilities increased. In the consequence of the above, our equity ratio effectively remains stable at a strong 54%. Cash and cash equivalents reduced to EUR 51.8 million at the end of H1 '26, which mainly results from prepayments, the operational result, and other investment activities into our products, while major receivables from the earlier mentioned revenues were open for payment at the end of H1 2026.
And this is a good segue for looking at our cash flows and working capital indicators, which were determined by multiple factors. Aside from the operational result and some prepayments, increase in our inventories and orders as well as reduced trade payable influenced our net cash flow from operating activities. In addition, continued but reduced capitalized investment activities into FYB206 and FYB208 versus some incoming loan payments from Bioeq overall reduced net investing activities. In total, we recorded a reduction of our cash and cash equivalents from EUR 68.8 million to EUR 51.8 million, which is in range of what we anticipated.
On the working capital side, you will also notice that our receivables remain also relatively high, resulting from various items such as royalties, upfront payments, milestones, reimbursements, and prepayments. This KPI is balanced with a comparable amount of trades payable in range of approximately EUR 21 million, leading to an H1 2026 working capital of EUR 51.2 million.
Let's take a look at our guidance for the remainder of 2026. Revenue-wise, we had a good and strong acceleration into the new year with positive factors from different products. Going forward, revenue growth shall be driven by an increase of FYB202 royalties, which are expected to grow compared to H1. This may happen nonlinear but more in waves depending on new contracts and orders coming in.
Commercial biosimilars revenues can be influenced by tender timing, by customer contracting, inventory movements, and the timing of royalty recognition. And while we continue to work in a challenging environment, our focus for the second half is on further market penetration for FYB202, coordinated by our licensing partners and continued commercial execution across our portfolio.
Furthermore, FYB206 is anticipated to contribute in a similar ballpark like in H1 2026 when considering recognition of milestones over time for North America and rest of world. Additional partnerships for Lat Am and APAC may contribute on top once signed, depending on final upfront and milestone arrangement.
FYB201 is anticipated to reaccelerate further based on regaining market share in the U.S., which ideally leads to increasing royalties. FYB203 is launching in Europe and in the U.S., with the U.S. starting in Q4 2026. Thus, no significant impact to be expected in 2026, but some revenues resulting from remaining development recharges as well as handling the supply for FYB203 product. In essence, FYB202 and FYB206 will be the main pillars of our revenue guidance, with FYB201 and FYB203 adding to the overall financial performance. Based on this planning, going concern is secured at this point in time, and we can confirm guidance.
Let's take a brief look at our shareholder structure and recommendations by our research coverage. Our anchor shareholders remain a very committed and stable part of our overall shareholdership within Formycon. We maintain to have a free float around 40% and all our -- or most of our research coverage analysts remain with a buy recommendation at this point in time.
With having said that, I conclude my part of the presentation and would like to hand back to the operator, opening the Q&A session, which we are looking forward. Thank you very much.
[Operator Instructions] And we have the first question from Simon Scholes from First Berlin.
2. Question Answer
I've just got one. It's on the Q2 income for FYB206. In Q1, I think it was basically the completion of the Phase I trial plus a Lotus upfront. Can we just clarify what the income was in Q2 for FYB206?
Yes. Thanks, Simon. Hand over to Enno directly.
Yes, happy to do so. And the income in Q1 was, as you rightly say, was the recognition of a one-off milestone, namely the upfront payment by the signature of the Lotus deal, while the other part or the major part of the revenues were deferred revenues. So we have a bundle of revenues, which we partially already realized, like, for instance, the successful conclusion of the PK Phase I study for Merck Keytruda trial and some other milestones, which will hopefully happen in the future so that we have these milestones deferred and part of that was already recognized in Q1, of course. And so that means for our Q2, in total, we have about EUR 10 million or EUR 11 million from our partners coming in through that revenues.
Maybe to add on that, because that question might come on top for H2, that means that the rest -- remainder of the milestone expectations or revenue expectations is coming from the remaining deferred milestones, which will come from starting and successfully completing the regulatory procedures for our partners, and we feel pretty confident based on our regulatory capabilities that we can manage that and that there's a high likelihood and a lot of derisk situation for FYB206 milestone payments.
So in Q2 was EUR 6.2 million and -- sorry, Q1 was EUR 6.2 million and Q2 was EUR 5.9 million. So this...
Yes, roughly, you're in the right ballpark.
Yes. And what was the EUR 5.9 million again? So it's just deferred...
It's deferred milestones that we recognize over time, obviously mainly from the largest partnership. That's why I differentiated in my speech just now between North America and rest of the world. This is where the deferred milestones are coming from. For Europe, we don't have a partner yet and therefore, no revenue recognition.
[Operator Instructions] And we have the next question from Nicolas Pauillac from Kepler Cheuvreux.
Hopefully you can hear me. So I just had like 2 questions for me. The first one was just on the FYB202 ramp-up. So I think you made some comments that it's maybe not as high as you would have liked to be, let's say, for the H1. And I was looking at the split. It looks like Q2 you were able to get like almost EUR 4 million of royalties. When we start to think about what will be the momentum or the cadence moving into H2, do you have any color on what will be, let's say, the expected run rate in terms of quarterly revenues by the end of the year? Like, are we speaking double-digit million royalties by then? Or it's too aggressive, let's say, to expect that? So that would be my first question.
And also on FYB202, in terms of, let's say, revenues split, would you say it's like an evenly split between the U.S. and Europe or you are seeing maybe a more favorable situation in Europe? So that would be the first question on FYB202. And then a second question, sorry, is on the rest of the pipeline. Is there any updates on FYB208? And also, do you have any time line on when we might get more info on the other products that are being developed in the pipeline right now?
Yes, thanks, Nicolas. I'll start with the question on FYB202. So H2 expectations, we are not receiving and reporting quarterly sales expectations, but the ramp-up we expect, as Enno briefly outlined for the second half, is momentum in U.S., France, and Germany. Those are the key markets with U.S. still dominating.
And the U.S. perspective comes from the 2 deals, the major deals that have been announced already previously, the 1 was the exclusive distribution deal with CivicaScript last year. And there is always a [ moment ] where there needs to be resupply and which was the main driver for the strong performance in Q4 last year. And there was a federal deal that has been announced, also an exclusive deal for Fresenius in U.S., which will also drive momentum and starting now and continuing in the Q2 and -- Q3 and Q4 of this year.
As said, this is not a linear business. It comes with order, it comes with contracts, and that's why we cannot predict the month when which number will kick in. But these are the 2 drivers for U.S. In Europe we're generally facing fierce competition and tenders across many countries. In France, we expect strong performance of Otulfi driven by 2 things. The one is the introduction of the auto substitution, which was a bit delayed from January to April and which is supposed definitely to support biosimilar adoption, which we also see in Germany. And there are contract wins from the French Fresenius team, including the largest retail pharmacy there, where Otulfi is positioned as the #1 product. So this will generate volume in France in the second half of the year. And Germany is continuously also in Q2 already gaining traction, and this is supported by our dual branding strategy, which is starting to pay off.
So these are the -- to give you a flavor where our prognosis of a ramp-up in H2 comes from for FYB202. And again, revenue split, second part, more towards U.S., but, of course, also significant sales in Germany and France.
And then FYB208, yes we are in the scale-up phase. We have -- of course, FYB208 will be also competitive and needs cost-competitive manufacturing. That's our focus and where we have good plans to ramp up and scale up and to establish a commercial manufacturing process, which is underway. The clinical study will start. This will also lead to a clinical study in the upcoming years.
For the new pipeline, we try to keep it under the radar as long as possible. We typically announce that around the TPoS, depending on the competitive situation. And as those products, FYB209, FYB210, have more far out loss of exclusivities, there's still some time until we get into this ramp-up and commercial manufacturing and study phase, which would then give us the green light for announcing the molecules.
And as said also briefly in my presentation, we're going to start probably 2 to 3 more molecules in the second half because enriching our pipeline constantly is part of our mission and our business model. We've not announced that, but we will announce when we start new programs.
[Operator Instructions] At the moment, we have no further questions. So we have one follow-up question from Nicolas Pauillac.
Just another question I had was regarding FYB206 and, let's say, the path forward. Now that you are, let's say, starting to look more closely at the regulatory filing and stuff like that. How confident will be in your ability to, let's say, have a fair battle against Merck and Keytruda? Because I assume they are getting more and more aggressive in their ability to, let's say, fight till the end to extend the patent duration. So do you have any comments or is it still too early for you to tell?
And also, in terms of strategy, I think it's very nice because you are the first -- you're probably going to be the first to file. But will you wait to start the litigation for other competitors to find like a better, let's say, angle to the litigation or you will try to start right away?
I understand the questions, Nicolas. They are good questions, but only part of that I can answer, of course. in general, we can expect this is a complex IP landscape. It's comparable in complexity to other molecules. So that's -- we are used to that. And we are, of course, working with local specialists, U.S. patent attorneys and so on to be prepared. The reputed IP data sources are focused in biosimilar competition in '29 for U.S.
Of course, every product has a specific IP situation on indications on formulation and so on, but we are confident that we are well prepared to grasp those opportunities. There are also other markets with even earlier opportunities, which we, of course, also want to go after. For competitive reasons, of course, I cannot share our litigation strategy, but for sure, being among the first filers will be also among the first litigators or when the patent then starts. So that's also one of the big advantages to be of the first mover situation. And that Merck will be as aggressive as others that defend this huge market, that's clear. But that's the fun part of biosimilars as well. Does that answer your question, Nicolas?
Yes.
Thank you. So there are no further questions. So back to you.
So yes, with that, surprising, no questions. So our presentations obviously covered all the questions and did not leave anything open. So thank you very much for the operators, also for our Investor Relations team and my Board colleagues and especially everyone who joined today in the earning call. Thank you for your ongoing trust and confidence in Formycon. And I think with a clear strategy, with a strong execution and a highly motivated team, we are well positioned to create lasting value for our shareholders while making a meaningful difference for the patients worldwide. So thank you for participating and look forward to the next interactions.
Formycon — Q2 2026 Earnings Call
Formycon — Q1 2026 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Formycon AG Earnings Call Q1 2026. [Operator Instructions] Let me now turn the floor over to your host, Dr. Stefan Glombitza.
Yes. Thank you, and good afternoon, good morning, and welcome to everyone joining us today. Earlier today, we published our Q1 results for 2026. And before we move to the presentation, let me highlight just some key takeaways upfront. First of all, our financial performance in the first quarter clearly supports our full year guidance 2026, the year marking our entry into sustainable EBITDA profitability and continued scaling of the business.
In the year-on-year comparison, we delivered significant growth versus the first quarter of 2025, which is underlining both the robustness of our business model and the continued strength of our execution. Second takeaway from an operational perspective, we had a strong start to the year as well, achieving multiple key milestones across all 4 pillars of our Fit for Growth strategy with a key highlight, of course, of positive results from our CYP2D6 study in February. And third, on 15th of May, so just recently, we successfully launched our third pipeline product, CYP203, a biosimilar to Eylea in Europe, an important step in further expanding our commercial platform and another testament of our ability to deliver against our pipeline.
Over the next 30 minutes, Enno Spillner and me will walk you through our presentation and Nicola Mikulcik, our CBO, is prepared to cover respective topics in the Q&A. So let us begin, and thank you again for listening in today. As usual, before we begin, please note that our presentation and the Q&A both contain forward-looking statements that are, as always, subject to usual risks and uncertainties as outlined in the disclaimer you see.
Fit for Growth is our strategic compass to capture the tremendous biosimilars opportunity ahead. It is built on 4 pillars that directly translate into competitiveness, capital efficiency and sustainable long-term growth when executed in a disciplined and agile way. And let me briefly explain what is behind each of the 4 pillars.
Number one, geographic diversification. Europe and the United States are still remaining the core target markets. Formycon deliberately expands into high-growth emerging regions with increasing demand for affordable biologic medicines. Geographic diversification is a critical lever to both improve patient access and mitigate single market dependencies. It strengthens our resilience to geopolitical and pricing volatility. Our approach is anchored in partnerships, partnerships with strong regional players across MENA, LATAM, APAC and Sub-Saharan Africa so far, which is central to unlocking the full global potential of our assets.
Smart portfolio. Formycon's smart portfolio strategy is designed to build a robust commercial product portfolio out of a huge number of future LoE opportunities. A balanced mix of blockbuster opportunities with carefully selected niche assets creates a diversified and future-proof pipeline with strong partnership appeal and optimized risk return profiles. However, a pipeline only translates into commercial value through disciplined execution and consistently high probability of success. And that's where the next pillar kicks in.
Excellence and innovation are embedded in our DNA. It's the core to how we operate. Formycon has proven repeatedly that it consistently delivers high development and regulatory quality, accelerated approval timelines. So in a nutshell, a flawless operational track record. Building our deep biosimilar development expertise, we are also driving differentiated innovation. ranging from advanced drug device combinations such as the ophthalmic prefilled syringe, which we introduced for FYB201 last year and our recently approved auto-injector for FYB202 and further to streamline clinical development approaches, including the pioneering Phase III waiver for our pembrolizumab biosimilar.
Excellence in execution and innovation create first-mover opportunities and position Formycon as a trusted high-performance partner in biosimilars. Biosimilars are the fastest-growing segment, but attractivity also generates fierce competition. The excellence in execution and innovation, what I explained before, brings first-mover advantages. Lean development and manufacturing is key to stay competitive in the market over a long period of time after launch. So we are continuously challenging ourselves, how can we streamline our clinical and regulatory concepts? How can we better leverage digital and AI-supported processes. That way, we could already materially reduce development timelines and costs while maintaining the highest quality standards.
This step change in capital efficiency and scalability positions us well to capture the upcoming wave of loss of exclusivity opportunities with greater speed and returns. So in a nutshell, Fit for Growth is our framework and compass, combining global market diversification, a smart and selective portfolio, lean development and manufacturing and uncompromising excellence and innovation to drive sustainable and profitable growth. We will continue to execute with discipline and laser focus on this clear strategic road map.
This slide highlights how we systematically expand our global footprint and drive growth in a capital-efficient manner through strategic partnerships. On the back of a strong and proven development track record, Formycon has established high credibility, which is allowing us to collaborate with a broad network of leading regional commercial partners in markets with increasing demand for biosimilars. Our capital-efficient partnership-led commercialization model enables us to scale rapidly across regions and efficiently expand patient access to critical biologics worldwide.
We have here highlighted for this conference the new flags, which we could add in the first month of this year, be it new partnerships in certain territories for FYB206 or relaunch and new launches for FYB201 and of course, the very recent FYB203 launch in Europe. Strong partnerships turn our development engine into global, diversified and capital-efficient growth. Our confidence in the 2026 outlook is based on further tangible progress along our 4 pillars of Fit for Growth. Several value-creating milestones have been already achieved in the first months of 2026 in all 4 segments and more to come in the next quarters.
Coming to geographic diversification, we continue to expand our global footprint through targeted regional partnerships. Progress in early 2026 includes the launch in Brazil of FYB201 with Bioeq and the 206 license deal with Lotus across multiple APAC markets. Further license agreements are in negotiations and will follow.
Looking at our commercial portfolio, Cimerli has been reintroduced to the U.S. market in January. And Nufymco, our second FYB201 product with partner Zydus shall be added in the second half of this year. FYB203, and I mentioned that already in the beginning, reached a key inflection point with the settlement, enabling a European launch in May and a clear path forward in the U.S. in Q4. And on May 15, we finally brought the third product from our development pipeline to markets and patients in Europe, which is marking an important milestone in expanding our commercial portfolio.
Advanced state-of-the-art device technologies are creating added value and improved treatment convenience for patients. And building on the last year's ophthalmic prefilled syringe launch in FYB201, we will soon enhance our partners' FYB202 offering with an auto-injector following EMA approval, which we received in April. Driven by the pioneering Phase III waiver approach, FYB206 continues to progress as planned. We could confirm PK equivalence in February, which is a key element of the regulatory dossier, which we are preparing full speed.
Phase III waivers are generating significant savings. Our Fit for Future program delivers measurable impact beyond. Through streamlined processes, smart regulatory concepts and cost competitive CDMO partnerships, we have reduced our development timelines and costs for new programs already by around 30%. So taken together, Fit for Growth has moved beyond strategy. It's now firmly delivering execution and underpinning sustainable long-term value creation. On the back of a strong foundation, 2026 is about accelerating and scaling impact.
With that, I want to conclude my part of the presentation and hand over to our CFO, Enno Spillner, who has prepared a deep dive into the financial numbers of Q1. So thank you for your continued attention.
Yes. Thank you, Stefan, and I'll happily take it from here. Welcome, everyone, to our Q1 2026 call. And it's a pleasure to introduce our quite positive Q1 2026 numbers to you only 5 weeks after we introduced our year-end 2025 numbers. So you probably still recall some in-depth details. So therefore, we will only focus really on Q1 2026 performance.
That said, let's take a look at the oversight of our P&L, where we have good operational momentum, translating into a significant revenue growth and significant revenue increase. So revenues are on track and show a significant step-up versus Q1 2025, meaning more than doubling the revenue total compared to the respective quarter in 2025. Transformation of our revenue structure continues now with significantly more revenues coming in from efforts in commercializing our products. And our main revenue drivers are FYB202 and FYB206. This mainly includes upfront payments, milestones and royalties. And I'll come back to the details later on one of our next slides.
Looking at the cost of sales. The cost of sales in total are relatively stable compared to Q1 2025. We continue recording the regular amortization of FYB202, which makes about EUR 5.2 million in Q1 2026 versus EUR 6.2 million in Q1 2025. Would we adjust for this accounting measure, we would be looking at operational cost of sales of approximately EUR 10.7 million in Q1 2026 versus EUR 8.6 million in Q1 2025. Also here, we continue to recognize our transformation towards a more commercial-related setting with significant parts of cost of sales related to commercial efforts like, for example, prepayments for supply in selected cases. Also here, I will come back to details on one of the next couple of slides.
Looking at the R&D expenses. R&D expenses significantly reduced, especially with FYB208 having achieved technical proof of similarity and therefore, respective costs being capitalized since last fall of 2025. Thus, the currently relevant assets are FYB209 and in particular, 210, which are contributing into our R&D line. However, these 2 remaining assets are still less cost intense due to their earlier stage -- earlier development stage, and this triggers the overall R&D spend to reduce accordingly.
Coming to the EBITDA. Our EBITDA improved significantly by more than EUR 11 million compared to Q1 2025. This, of course, is consisting of different effects. Revenues increased significantly, as just mentioned, while costs or cost of sales still fairly stable or a slight increase and R&D and other expenses have been noticeably reduced. Continuous cost control, active management of our structural costs and some beneficial effects helped to reduce our other operational expenses in this regard.
Looking at the adjusted EBITDA, the group adjusted EBITDA amounted to minus EUR 3.6 million versus minus EUR 11.8 million in Q1 2025. This, again, is a significant EUR 8.2 million uplift against the comparable quarter in 2025, trailing our EBITDA, so to say. However, what is different this time is the fact that the adjusted EBITDA came out below our standard EBITDA. Since the adjusted EBITDA, in addition, only mirrors the performance of our joint venture, Bioeq AG, this reflects the started relaunch of FYB201 sales and marketing in the U.S. as well as the prefilled syringe implementation in Europe, triggering a negative contribution by our joint venture for the reporting first quarter of 2026.
Last point. Looking at the capitalized development cost here in Q1 2026, we are -- or we mainly contributed to the further development activities of FYB208 and FYB206. Please note, development costs for FYB206 continue to be capitalized partially, namely for the European Union or for Europe, while the U.S. part is being covered under cost of sales in context of our Zydus partnership. The clear decrease of this investment total is mainly due to the fact that FYB206 clinical trials were in full swing in Q1 2025, while in Q1 '26, this investment driver was mainly concluded and FYB208 is not yet in the clinic.
Let's take a closer look at the breakdown of our sales. Current development is clearly reflecting the aforementioned change in revenue structure. Recharges for development work of FYB201 and FYB203 continue to reduce significantly as the products do not require any major development work in a significant amount anymore. This part of revenue has been expectedly reduced by 50% to EUR 2 million. Royalties for FYB201 now need to reaccelerate after pausing marketing in the U.S. until end of 2025. Our U.S. partner now has to reengage into the U.S. market and rebuild respective market share, which may take some time. But we are optimistic seeing an acceleration here during the course of the year.
Royalties for FYB202 almost doubled. And while these sales revenues from IP202 are currently still developing modestly, we see positive trends from our partners' activities in the U.S., leaving us optimistic for further costs -- for the further course of the year 2026. In addition, we successfully achieved a further development milestone for FYB202 in context of the development of the auto-injector, which we do recognize in Q1 2026 as a one-off.
The new kid on the block are our revenues recognized in context of FYB206 derived from upfront payments, from milestone payments from different partners and from our FYB206 partnership or consequently from our FYB206 partnerships from Lotus, from Zydus and from MS Pharma. In total, this reflects continued structural change of our revenues for Q1 2026 in subsequent years with a good revenue mix from different products and revenue categories.
Also with regard to our cost of sales, we continue the same structural changes as just described in context of our revenues. Operational cost of sales remained fairly consistent for FYB202, also in context of some supply prepayments we had to cover, generating future revenues and upside. Please also bear in mind that the regular amortization of FYB202 considered under our cost of sales is neither EBITDA nor cash flow relevant and makes a significant portion of FYB202 total cost of sales.
Cost of sales for our recharge development efforts on FYB201 and FYB203 reduced once again significantly for both products. The new position of cost of sales for 206 is in context of our revenue recognition of our deferred milestones, and this contains the respective continued development costs for the U.S. development and targeted market approval.
Looking at our group assets in respect to structure. Our balance sheet total stands at a strong EUR 717 million, and the reduction mainly results from the net cash outflow and some prepayments that we have. Equity is reduced by EUR 15, 1-5 million, mainly due to the net result. And at the same time, our liabilities decreased slightly by net EUR 9 million, which is driven by 2 main effects. On the one hand side, trade payables have been reduced while contract liabilities slightly increased.
In consequence of the above, our equity ratio almost remained stable at a strong 53.7%. Cash and cash equivalents reduced to EUR 54 million at the end of Q1 2026, which mainly results from the aforementioned prepayments and other investment activities into our products, while major receivables from the earlier mentioned revenues were still due at the end of Q1 2026.
And this point is also a good segue for looking at our cash flow and our working capital indicators. Cash flow and working capital were determined by multiple factors. Aside from the operational result and continued capitalized investment into FYB206 and FYB208, some prepayments and orders influenced our net cash flow, as just already indicated. However, on the right side of the slide, you'll also see that our current receivables were also quite significant, totaling from various positions such as royalties, upfronts and milestones, reimbursements and prepayments totaling to EUR 28.9 million. On the working capital side, current receivables as well as current liabilities and revenue accruals were the most influential factors, leading to a Q1 2026 working capital of EUR 66 million.
Let's take a look at our guidance for the remainder of the year. Revenue-wise, we had a good start into the new year with positive factors from different products. Growth shall be driven by FYB202 royalties, which will continue not to grow linear, but more in waves depending on new contracts and orders coming in coordinated by our licensing partner. Furthermore, FYB206 is anticipated to contribute with further achievements of additional milestones in context of our further development work towards filing and approval, especially in the U.S. Please bear in mind that accounting-wise, these milestones will be recognized over time as deferred milestones. Thus, cash in and revenue recognition may deviate from each other. Also further partnering like the already before mentioned or announced Lotus partnership may be added to the FYB206 revenue recognition over the course of the year.
FYB201 is anticipated to reaccelerate again, as mentioned, especially with our second partner joined for the U.S. sales and marketing during the course of H2. FYB203 is launching in Europe and in the U.S. with U.S. starting in Q4 2026. Thus no significant impact to be expected from the royalty part, but some revenues resulting from remaining development recharges as well as handling the supply for the FYB203 product. So in essence, FYB202 and FYB206 being the 2 strong main pillars of our revenue guidance with FYB201 and FYB203 adding to the overall performance. Based on this planning, going concern should be secured at this point in time, and we can confirm guidance.
Let me conclude with the slide that you well know already from the past and just reconfirming to you that on the one side, our research coverage continues to be broad and well attended with the most of our analysts with a buy recommendation. Second, we have a stable commitment by our existing anchor investors who mainly remain unchanged compared to what we reported in previous quarters.
With that, at the end of my content of my presentation, and I would like to conclude with a couple of personal words today because you all know or many of you know the strong communication voice in our team here at Formycon. And Sabrina Muller, unfortunately, has decided to leave Formycon after many exciting years at the company. And we would just say a big thank you to Sabrina for her engagement, for her commitment and also for her great contact to you out there at conferences, at roadshows and with the analysts. Thank you, Sabrina, for your support over the time. It was a great pleasure.
And with that said, I finally hand back to the operator, being open for your questions and comments on our Q1 report. Thank you very much.
[Operator Instructions] So our first question, we have from Nicolas Pauillac, Kepler Cheuvreux.?
2. Question Answer
Hopefully, you can hear me. First of all, congrats on the results and all the best to Sabrina. It was really nice working with you. And so just a few questions on what you commented. Just a pretty simple one, but on the joint venture revenues, is it fair to assume that the Q1 was really purely a one-off effect and we should come back to positive contribution moving forward and it was just, let's say, launch momentum cost. So that would be the first question. And then just on 206, it would be nice if you could kind of give us what's the next big milestone in the development timeline that you guys have in mind? And what will be the, let's say, commercial milestone or development milestone that we should expect over the next maybe 3 years?
And also on that, what will be your assumption? And when do you think that you will be able to launch the drug, whether it's in the U.S. or in Europe? And lastly, the final is on the 208. We think that Sanofi is becoming more and more vocal about their ambition to kind of delay the LoE as much as possible. And I think now they are referring that they think they could get like up to 2 years of extra commercial opportunity in the U.S. How do you think about that? And was that kind of your initial assumption that it was going to go that way? And I will stop there.
Okay. That was 3 questions. I would like to start with the probably most easiest one. On 206, those next milestones are, of course, compiling all the different parts you need for a complete dossier for an FDA filing. So of course, a big portion, a big segment of that was the successful PK study results, but there are more so-called CMC parts from manufacturing, from stability, from similarity, analytical assessment, which will undergo scrutiny because of the Phase III waiver where we need good results, which we have in hand. So we were compiling that. I will not comment on the timing, but we are fast track on our way to the next milestone, which is the submission. And then usually, typically 60 days after submission, you will receive if the FDA is okay with the data that you submitted, the so-called file acceptance. And that would be then the latest point in time where we would announce this milestone. 208, maybe I hand over to Nicola, who's also overseeing the IP.
Yes. So we found that a quite bold statement from Sanofi and probably Regeneron also commented on that. It just shows that the patent fight starts really 5, 6, 7, 8 years before a potential launch. And this is a pretty normal situation in biosimilars these days. We can, at the moment, not confirm that 2 years' delay or what Sanofi has contemplated. We are, of course, constantly observing and working with outside counsels and so on, on the patent landscape along the development of our products and during regulatory phase. And it's really too early to comment in detail on those statements for us. But at this stage, we do not see a reason why we should become nervous about that. And the other question was on. . .
Was on the joint venture Q1 performance for Bioeq, so to say. And Nicolas, I think your interpretation is correct that we are assuming that this will swing into a positive performance for the subsequent quarters to come. It's a kind of regular not always matching inventory building and sales. So that's the typical behavior you see in some products. But nothing concerning. Okay. With that, Nicolas, are you fine with the responses?
Yes.
Next question is from Yi Chen, H.C. Wainwright.
This is Katie on for Yi. Could you give us an idea if your EBITDA guidance range can be achieved with the current trajectory for 201, 202 and 203 alone? Or are you going to require 206 to hit some more milestones in licensing for this year? And for 206, if it's required, what's the contingency plan if those deals take as long to close as some of those deals in 2025 did?
Yes, I'll start that and the others might chime in. So of course, the guidance and Enno alluded to that also in the year-end and guidance session, does include 206 milestones and deferred milestones. This is part of our business model. And I think it's good revenue, although not coming directly from commercial market. We are counting on that. It's not based on -- it's basically most of the milestone amounts that are planned in our guidance are deferred revenues from achievements, not additional deals. So additional deals would come on top with existing deals where we have continued milestone success payments that are deferred over the period. Of course, if we don't manage to achieve those milestones, then it's a different thing, but it's not -- it does not need additional deals.
Maybe to briefly add to that question and as a reminder to everyone, as Stefan just mentioned a couple of times, this is deferred revenue recognition. So really, what we're basically doing, we are bundling all relevant milestones up to market approval in the U.S., putting them into one bucket, if you will, and then deferring over the whole period until we achieve that goal. And in that regard, it's even more logic to have them implemented into our guidance because they are kind of going over the year. And against that, we are also booking the respective development cost. So it's not really volatile in terms of, let's say, achieving in Q1, the clinical milestone for the delivered PK study and then somewhere between at the end of the year or so other milestones in context of filing, for instance. So it's not that volatile or digital, but it's deferred over time.
Next question we have from Simon Scholes, First Berlin.
I've got 3 questions. First of all, I was wondering if you expect any further non-206 milestones during the rest of this year? And then secondly, I was wondering if you expect that 2/3 of 206 development will continue to be booked in COGS for the rest of this year. And can you give me an idea of what total capitalized development expenditure for '26 might be? And am I right in assuming -- presumably, I'm right in assuming that nearly all of the capitalized development expenditure relates to 206, and that's it.
Okay. Happy to start with the first one. So any further non-206 milestones, not foreseen for now. Of course, that gives us also the flexibility for an opportunity -- upside opportunity if we strike deals, but we need the flexibility not to be forced into synergies because we want -- we need that to deliver our guidance. So we're clear from today's point of view, guidance is not having any non-206reated milestones.
Yes. And then with regards to the breakdown, currently, the assumption is that, again, as we indicated, roughly 2/3 of the cost will be in context of the investment, will be in context of the U.S. engagement and roughly 1/3 then for Europe. And the total COGS, so to say, that we are anticipating here under this partnership is in the range of, yes, EUR 15 million to EUR 20 million, let's keep it that way, that we are kind of anticipating here for 2026.
Is it -- are you expecting 2/3 of that 15 million, 20 million to be in COGS?
Yes.
And the other 1/3 in capitalized?
Yes, roughly. Just as a rule of the thumb, we will not guide. . .
That would suggest that you're not going to be hardly going to capitalize anything for the rest of this year because you've already done 6.
Say again.
If you're doing 15 to 20 -- if you've got total development expenses for 206 million of 15 million to 20 million this year and 2/3 is in COGS. I mean that suggests you will hardly capitalize anything during the rest of this year.
No, no. I just -- when I said 15 million to 20 million, this was only COGS. And bear in mind, 208 million also being capitalized.
[Operator Instructions] We already have our next person. Again, Mr. Nicolas Pauillac.
Sorry for the follow-up question. I was just looking at your slides and one of the 4 pillars that you flagged for the next stage is going to be the geographic expansion. How should we think about what will be the ideal mix in terms of geographic split going forward between the U.S., Europe and international? And is there a reason to think that maybe the U.S. is not where is the largest opportunity for biosimilar today? Just trying to figure out how you are building the, let's say, development stage in the future.
That's a question that is hard to answer, Nicolas. I mean, of course, the strategic pillar means that we have to do all of that. So stay focused on EU and U.S., and they will remain for the next years, of course, the key markets in size and budget, health care budget that needs to be reduced by biosimilars. But we see more and more, we should not overlook and we put a lot of emphasis on the additional markets so that we reduce the dependency from EU and U.S. And you see already, let's say, that in some of the -- and that's really also product-specific and very partner specific for 201.
For instance, we have very strong among the top 3 countries is one of the countries of the MENA region. So we see that already tangibly in some of the markets. For sure, it will take another 5 years plus until we see those regions kick in significantly and replacing Europe and U.S. But for sure, that's the journey that trend is significant. And I would say it's an add-on opportunity to fully leverage our value of the assets because the developments are -- can be used unilaterally for all regions. So it's a very capital-efficient way to leverage those with financial -- with commercial partners everywhere. And as we do not have to build commercial workforce and sales force in those countries, our partnership model is the right thing to do to increase the global reach.
Probably one thing we can add, and this is that some of those smaller markets are from a patent perspective, easier to tackle. And therefore, this helps us to get started earlier and get our supply chain in full swing in preparation for the larger markets. That's also a strategic element in this whole discussion, but it very much depends really on the product and also patent situation in each and every market. So. . .
Thanks, Nicola, for that addition, especially for 206 that will be relevant because we have the first-mover advantage, and we can leverage those opportunities.
The next question is from Alexander Zienkowicz, [ MVP ] Research.
And we cannot hear you in case you are speaking.
I hope you can hear me. On FYB202, could you provide more color on the positive signals that make you optimistic? And is this directed at the U.S. specifically? And could you elaborate on international performance perhaps?
Yes. I mean there was, let's say, a recent announcement that makes us happy, of course, and that was that Fresenius Kabi's strong U.S. team recently secured a contractual agreement for Otulfi with a large federal buyer. So that adds to our positive mood there. And similar to the Civica script exclusive distribution deal, which was entered into last year and which will continue, of course, and which was the main driver for strong performance in Q4 last year. This new federal agreement just is also a very positive trend because it opens up new channels and customer segments and will -- is expected to strengthen Otulfi's U.S. performance already in the second half of this year. That's the one positive momentum.
And in Europe, -- of course, in general, we are seeing a fierce competition, especially in tender-driven markets and countries. But also there, with the recent announcement in France, we see encouraging momentum, our partner, Fresenius Kabi for further growth. And that's not only the introduction of a substitution, which in general is supposed to drive the biosimilar adoption, but also contract wins, recent ones, including the country's largest retail pharmacy, which was also stated in the Fresenius Kabi earnings call, the Fresenius earnings call, where Otulfi is positioned as #1 product. So those 2 elements are driving our optimism that we will see growth in FYB202 and already tangible increase this year so that we are confident with our guidance.
So at the moment, there seems not to be any further questions. So I will end now the Q&A session. Thank you.
b
Yes. Thank you. And finally, I would thank -- like to thank you, the operator, our Investor Relations team with a special big thanks to Sabrina, my Board colleagues and especially everyone who joined today's earnings call. Thank you for your continued interest and your trust in Formycon. We remain fully committed, as you know us, to delivering sustainable growth and creating long-term value for our shareholders. And ultimately, also, let's not forget, to the benefit of the patients worldwide. Thank you for joining us today.
Formycon — Q1 2026 Earnings Call
Formycon — Q4 2025 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Formycon AG Earnings Call Full Year 2025. [Operator Instructions] Let me now turn the floor over to Dr. Stefan Glombitza.
Yes. Thank you for the introduction, and good afternoon, good morning, and welcome to everyone joining us today. Before we begin, allow me a brief note on timing as this year's publication of our results came later than usual. The transition of our financial system at year-end was a necessary step, but it required additional diligence in close coordination with our auditors to ensure the highest quality and reliability of our financial reporting. We appreciate, therefore, your patience in this process.
Earlier today, we published our full year 2025 results. And before we go into the presentation, let me highlight 3 key messages upfront. Number one, in a dynamically and for sure, demanding market environment, we clearly outperformed our guidance for EBITDA and working capital, which is underlining the resilience and quality of our business model. Even though revenues were lower and partly shifted into the new year. Number two, operationally, 2025 was a highly successful and transformational year for Formycon with multiple key milestones achieved across all 4 pillars of our Fit for Growth strategy, which I will explain later in a bit more detail.
And third, 2026 has already started strong with positive PK results for our FYB206 Keytruda biosimilar as well as an agreement with Bayer, clearing the path for the launch of our third biosimilar FYB203. Over the next 30 minutes, Enno Spillner, our CFO, and me, will walk you through our presentation. Nicola Mikulcik and Andreas Seidl are prepared to cover respective topics in the Q&A.
With that, let us begin, and thank you again for joining us today. As usual, before we begin, please note that our presentation and the Q&A contain forward-looking statements subject to the usual risks and uncertainties as outlined in our disclaimer. Now let's come to Fit for Growth. The biosimilars market continues to evolve rapidly with more than 100 biologics losing exclusivity over the next 10 years. In this dynamic environment, success requires 2 things; a clear strategic compass and disciplined execution, knowing where to play and how to win. Fit for Growth is our strategic framework to capture this opportunity. It is built on 4 pillars that directly translate into competitiveness, capital efficiency and sustainable long-term growth. Let me take a moment to explain in more detail what underpins each of the 4 pillars.
Pillar 1, geographic diversification. Beyond its core markets in Europe and the U.S., Formycon deliberately expands into high-growth emerging regions with increasing demand for affordable biologic medicines. Strategic partnerships with strong regional players in MENA, LatAm, APAC and Sub-Saharan Africa maximize the global value of each asset, reduce our single market dependencies and thus strengthen resilience against geopolitical and pricing volatility.
Formycon's smart portfolio strategy, Pillar 2 combines disciplined asset selection with focused execution with the ultimate goal to build a strong commercial product portfolio. By balancing blockbuster opportunities with carefully selected niche assets, we create a diversified and future-proof pipeline with strong partnership potential and optimized risk return profiles. Pillar 3, excellence and innovation are core to how we operate. Formycon since years consistently delivers high development and regulatory quality, accelerated approval time lines. So in a nutshell, a flawless operational track record. Building on our deep biosimilar development expertise, we also drive differentiated innovation from advanced drug device combinations like the ophtha prefilled syringe to streamlined clinical development concepts like our pioneering Phase III waiver in 206.
Excellence in execution and innovation creates first-mover opportunities and positions Formycon as a trusted high-performance partner in biosimilars. Pillar #4, lean development is a core enabler of our platform. By optimizing our clinical and regulatory concepts and leveraging more and more digital and AI supported processes, we materially reduced development time lines and costs while maintaining the highest quality standards. This approach enables a step change in capital efficiency and scalability and positions us well to capture the upcoming wave of exclusivity opportunities with greater speed and returns.
In summary, we continue to execute with discipline and laser focus on a clear strategic road map. Fit for Growth combines lean development, a smart and selective portfolio, global market diversification and an uncompromising excellence and innovation to drive sustainable and profitable growth. This slide illustrates how we grow our international scale to unlock global growth through strong partnerships. No single company can address all the upcoming opportunities in this fast-growing biosimilar space with, as said, more than 100 biologics running out of exclusivity in the next decade.
Through an attractive pipeline and high credibility from our proven development track record, we are able to engage with a broad network of strong regional commercial partners who need our biosimilars in their portfolio. This is a capital-efficient partnership-led commercialization model and enables us to scale rapidly across regions and efficiently expand patient access to critical biologics worldwide.
Looking at the growing number of marks here on this slide in emerging markets, you see already the positive impact of our geographic diversification strategy, preparing today the growth of tomorrow. So in a nutshell, strong partnerships turn our development engine into a global diversified and capital-efficient growth.
With that, I want to conclude the strategic and operational part and hand over to our CFO, Enno Spillner, for the long-awaited financial details.
Yes. Thank you, Stefan. Happy to take over. Welcome, everyone, also from my side to introducing the 2025 year-end numbers to you and of course, also providing an outlook for 2026 and the respective guidance. However, today, I would like to first start with an apology for our year-end 2025 reporting time line, which was stretched beyond the usual time frame. We had a couple of reasons here. We had changes in the financial team plus some health challenges with some of our colleagues. We had the technical adjustment that Stefan was already alluding to, namely the introduction of our new ERP system in January 2026, seeing the go-live, which took a lot of attention and capacity and we experienced extended review and reconciliation processes in the context of our year-end process and some of the parts that made it very challenging to maintain the time line as initially anticipated.
But let's take a look at the financial outcome at the first slide on a high-level summary. Revenues are below what we had targeted for 2025. And due to the transformation of our revenue structures, revenues were clearly expected to be reduced against 2024. This was already guided accordingly. However, we anticipated a higher compensating effect from some factors which did not fully develop momentum in the range we assumed, and I'll come back to that on one of the next couple of slides.
Regarding cost of sales, also here, we saw an associated reduction against 2024. This is mainly due to the fact that we continue recording the regular amortization of our FYB202, which makes about EUR 25 million in 2025, something we only recorded during Q4 in 2024. Would we adjust for the accounting measures, we would be looking at operational cost of sales of approximately EUR 16 million for 2025 versus EUR 47.5 million in 2024.
R&D expenses, here, the main assets of relevance are FYB208 for the main cause of the year 2025, FYB209 and then FYB210. The most investment intense of these 3 assets is FYB208, which successfully achieved the TPoS, technical proof of similarity with the end of Q3. And for Q4, respective investment into these assets was already capitalized. The remaining assets, FYB209 and especially FBYB210 are still less cost intense due to the early development stage, and this triggers overall the R&D amount to reduce accordingly.
Looking at the EBITDA, which improved significantly. Here, while revenues reduced by approximately EUR 25 million, as just indicated, we do recognize a direct counterbalancing effect of significant reduced cost in the range of approximately EUR 18 million, for example, development costs for FYB201 and FYB203 and R&D costs. The effect on cost reduction and the better-than-expected performance results from reduced cost of goods, but also from very strict cost management across operational costs, but also investment, higher-than-anticipated capitalized development investments and some timing shift in development costs into the next period.
Please also bear in mind that the regular amortization of FYB202 considered under our COGS here is neither EBITDA nor cash flow relevant and makes a very significant portion of our overall COGS. With regard to the adjusted EBITDA, our group adjusted EBITDA amounted to minus EUR 2.3 million and was, therefore, significantly above our forecast range. In addition to the just mentioned EBITDA effects, this was mainly attributable to upfront payments, which Bioeq received in connection with the new Zydus partnership for FYB201/NUFYMCO, which came in very late in 2025.
The earnings contribution from FYB201 via the joint venture of Bioeq amounted to EUR 1.4 million, and this was significantly below the prior year, and this is mainly or primarily due to the significant decline in revenues following the temporary pause of marketing of the product in the U.S.
Lastly, looking at the capitalized development cost. The capitalized development costs in 2025 are mainly contributed to the clinical development activities of FYB206. The clear increase of this investment is due to the fact that FYB206 clinical trials were recorded for the full scope of 2025, whereas in '24, the activities were only started midyear. In Q4 2025, also FYB208 achieved TPoS as just already indicated, and consequently, respective development costs are being capitalized as well.
Looking at the overview of our guidance. Sales are clearly below our guidance, and I will comment on this in context of the revenue slide on the next page. EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA and working capital are significantly better than anticipated. And here, the main reasons for the EBITDA effects from sales on the one side, but very intense cost management, higher capitalized development costs and development costs to be incurred to a later point in time as the major building blocks. The adjusted EBITDA, as I just mentioned, mainly benefits and profits from the positive development of the Bioeq performance, especially with the latest deals. And working capital, here, of course, we have to recognize the successful proceeds of EUR 70 million from our new corporate bond, which positively influenced this.
Advanced payments under the first commercialization partnerships of -- for FYB206, which still reached us in late 2025 are certainly also supportive to this performance. Let's take a closer look at the breakdown of our sales. And for 2025, this is consisting of 3 pillars; a, service development recharges; b, upfront and milestone payments; and c, royalties. Current development is clearly reflecting our change in the overall revenue structure if you look from '24 moving into '25. Recharges for development work on FYB201 and FYB203 continue to reduce significantly as products mature successfully. This is expected and planned or was expected and planned. However, development compensation still stood for a significant portion of our 2025 revenues, but not at all a comparison against what we saw in 2024.
Deferred milestones from FYB202 in 2024 have completely faded out in 2025 due to the successful approval of the product in fall 2024. This was also expected and planned accordingly. Product sales for FYB202 were a one-off effect in 2024 and thus not expected to repeat in such an amount in 2025. FYB201 royalties reduced mainly due to the pausing of the marketing for the product in the U.S., as just mentioned before. And therefore, in total, revenues in 2025 declined comparing against 2024, which was expected and also reflected in our guidance for '25. This effectively also means a significant structural change of revenues for '25 and in subsequent years. And in the regard, we recognized first strong signals of change in 2025.
So FYB202 royalties generated for the first time revenue in the amount of EUR 9.7 million in '25. These incoming royalties are not yet in a range to compensate for the other revenues. However, it became already one of our main pillars of our 2025 revenue generation. And it is, of course, anticipated to grow further, but I'll come back to that later.
Upfront payments and milestone payments from FYB206 partnering with Zydus and [ MS ] Pharma are contributing significantly to our 2025 revenue performance as well. This is highly exciting as it reflects the huge potential and the huge upside behind FYB206 as our next growing asset. So why did we come or why did we come out short of our guidance despite assuming in Q3 2025 that we still would reach our target? This consists of a couple of reasons. First, prolonged negotiations related to the conclusion of additional partnerships, including, for example, FYB206 for APAC, which required additional time due to the optimization of our economic terms.
Our new Lotus partnership for 206, which has been announced in Q1 2025 is one of these examples, which we realized in the meantime. Furthermore, milestone payments originally expected in the fourth quarter of 2025 were moved from a recognition point of view into the first quarter of 2026, where they will be recognized. Last but not least, and despite a strong fourth quarter in 2025 and a strong uptake, revenues from the commercialization of FYB202 developed less dynamic than anticipated in Q4 and thus also contributed to this deviation.
Coming to the cost of sales. Also with regard to cost of sales, we are recognizing similar structural changes as just described in context of our revenues. Operational cost of sales reduced significantly for FYB202, going down by approximately EUR 15 million and the reverse amortization for FYB202 saw the first full cycle in 2025 and thus increased from approximately EUR 8 million in the fourth quarter of '24 to EUR 25 million in 2025. Again, not EBITDA relevant, not cash relevant, just as a [indiscernible].
Cost of sales for our recharge development efforts on FYB201 and FYB203 reduced by approximately 60% from roughly EUR 25 million to EUR 10 million. In total, our cost of sales reduced by approximately the [ 1/4 ]. And on this slide, and you have seen a similar slide in the last year on our FYB202 valuation, it's just to make transparent to you the change in our value assumptions here. And probably most important to you is the upper line, the intangible asset of FYB202, which we tested in an impairment test, reducing the respective volume by EUR 60 million, which is not EBITDA relevant. However, we have compensating effects. First of all, the deferred tax liability needs to be adjusted as well, which then triggers this to be in a net cash generating unit with an impact of minus EUR 46 million. And as you recall, we have an earn-out obligation or liability on top, which then also is reduced accordingly and reducing our respective payments in the future, which in total makes it a net impact of EUR 41 million net.
Let's take a look at some of our group asset structure KPIs, which we summarized for you. Our balance sheet totals are at or do remain at a strong EUR 740 million. And the light reduction mainly results from reduced noncurrent assets, while, for example, our cash position increased. Equity is reduced by EUR 63 million, mainly due to the net result. And the same or at the same time, our liabilities increased net by roughly EUR 30 million or 10%, which is driven by 2 main effects. On the one hand side, we do have successfully raised our first bond, adding EUR 70 million of our -- to our liabilities. On the other hand, our earn-out obligations have been reduced due to, a, payback; and b, adjustment of our valuation model for FYB201 and for FYB202, which also indicated a reduction in our earn-out obligations. In consequence, our equity ratio is adjusted to a strong 54%.
Cash and cash equivalents increased to EUR 68.8 million at the end of 2025, which provides us a solid starting point for 2026 and the respective operations and also helps us to secure going concern. Cash flow and working capital on the next slide. These are, again, influenced by multiple factors. The net cash from operating activities was positive in 2025, different than in 2024, by the way, and mainly influenced by an increase in contract liabilities as well as an increase in trade payables, while we saw a decrease in contract assets. Net cash from investing activities reflects our strong engagement into FYB206, especially our clinical activities showed approximately EUR 50 million of investment and also FYB208 contributed to this effect with approximately EUR 4 million in Q4 2025.
At the same time, we were receiving EUR 15 million from Bioeq, repaying further parts of their shareholder loan to Formycon. On the working capital side, current receivables as well as current liabilities and revenue accruals were the most influential factors, leading to a working capital of EUR 70 million, which is above our guidance.
Let's take a look at our guidance for the full year 2026 and what you can expect. Overall, we will see a strong and very significant increase of our revenues, which are anticipated in our planning from EUR 45 million in 2025 to a range of EUR 60 million to EUR 70 million in 2026. While development recharges from FYB201 and FYB203 will continue to fade out, we will see a significant increase in commercial revenues, for example, from significant royalties and milestones, underlining our change in our revenue structure. What will be the major building blocks for this? First of all, royalty income from FYB202 will continue to grow significantly and should build one of the most significant pillars within our revenue recognition structure. These revenue may be a bit volatile over the quarters as our royalties do depend on contracts signed by our sales partners with their respective clients and when they fill their respective stock. But the trend should be positive and clear.
The second very significant building block will become our new kid on the block, if you will, from a revenue recognition perspective, at least FYB206. Achievable milestones in context of our further development work towards filing and approval, especially in the U.S., shall contribute significantly to our 2026 performance. Also further partnering like the already announced Lotus partnership for parts of the APAC region, but also other regional partnering may add to the FYB206 revenue performance.
FYB201 is anticipated to show an upswing in royalties again with Sandoz resuming sales for the U.S. already in January of this year and Zydus starting in the second half of this year as our second partner for sales and marketing in the U.S. Please bear in mind that development recharges will continue to reduce on the other side. FYB203 is expected to launch in Europe and in the U.S. in this year with U.S. starting in Q4 2026. Thus, no significant impact to be expected from the royalty part, but the major part of revenues coming from our remaining development recharges as well as handling the supply for FYB202 -- sorry, for FYB203 product. So in essence, FYB202 and FYB206 will be the 2 strong main pillars of our revenue guidance, pretty much on a comparable level with FYB201 and FYB203 adding to the overall picture.
Regarding our EBITDA for 2026, we do assume a positive EBITDA in the range of up to EUR 10 million. It is our goal to turn operationally positive this year and then continue a sustainable growth path from here, growing our EBITDA profitability. Our adjusted EBITDA is expected to come out even better than EBITDA with a range of EUR 5 million to EUR 15 million as Bioeq should accelerate its performance once again against the relaunch of FYB201 in the U.S. and actually [indiscernible].
Our working capital is expected to come out in the range of EUR 20 million to EUR 30 million, considering no financing activity for '26, but reflecting our continued investment into capitalized assets like FYB208 and partially FYB206. Based on this planning, going concern was also confirmed by our auditors, and it goes without saying that we have [indiscernible] continuing with significant saving efforts and cost control efforts to manage the cost side within our organization, also securing EBITDA profitability.
Then I would like to draw your attention to a completely different aspect of Formycon, namely our first-time report on our ESG activities and measures, which at this point in time is voluntarily and therefore, not yet fully audited. However, it summarizes as an extended report, all our activities in the field of ESG, which are certainly important to many different stakeholders, like our employees, like our industry partners, but potentially also to shareholders and investors. It provides a good overview on our activities and also our goals and our anticipated and planned initiatives for ESG across all different contexts that go along with that, and it also summarize respective risk aspects that we measure in this context.
Last comment on our share overview slide, so to say, and just here to remind you that we continue with some major key and anchor shareholders, which in total makes slightly above 50% of our total shareholding. And this is a very stable part of our shareholding structure. We continue with a broad setting of analysts moving forward, which we ideally intend to extend further this year and keep the shares traded and in parallel, obviously, also having the bond listed under its own ISIN number.
And with that, I conclude my part of the presentation and would like to hand back to Stefan. Thank you very much.
Yes. Thank you very much, Enno, for providing us a lot of insights into the financial numbers. Just want to conclude also and add on operational topics for the outlook 2026. 2025 was a transformational year in 2 key aspects for Formycon. First, in Q4, we passed the inflection point towards sustainably positive EBITDA, which Enno alluded to as well. And secondly, we made major progress in the operational transformation across our 4 strategic levers, as I lined out in the Fit for Growth strategy initiative.
Our confidence in the 2026 outlook is based on further tangible progress across all those pillars. Several value-creating milestones that I have depicted some of them have been already achieved in the first month of '26. Regarding geographic diversification, we continue to expand our global footprint through targeted regional partnerships. Progress in early 2026 includes, for instance, the FYB201 launch in Brazil with Biomm and also the mentioned deal with Lotus across multiple APAC markets for FYB206. Further license agreements, of course, will follow along those lines.
Looking at our commercial portfolio, as Enno mentioned, CIMERLI has been reintroduced to the U.S. market in January by Sandoz and NUFYMCO, our second FYB201 brand with a partner, Zydus shall be added in the second half of this year. FYB203 reached a key inflection point with the settlement enabling a European launch in May, so close to date and a clear path forward to the U.S. in quarter 4. At the same time, looking at the young portfolio, we are preparing the next wave of new portfolio additions for the second half of 2026 as well. Driving or driven by the pioneering Phase III wave approach, FYB206 continues to progress as planned, and we could confirm in February the PK equivalence data, which are a key element to the regulatory dossier, which we are preparing.
For our Dupixent biosimilar manufacturing scale-up is advancing, and we have received already positive early feedback from the agencies on our streamlined clinical development approach. In parallel, our Fit for Future program, which is a part of the pillar lean development, delivers measurable impact. Through streamlined processes, smart regulatory concepts and cost competitive CDMO partnerships, we have reduced development time lines and costs for new programs by around 30%. So taken together, Fit for Growth is no longer just a framework. It is translating into execution and sustainable long-term value creation. 2025 was about building the foundation, 2026 is about scaling results.
With that, I want to conclude the presentation and hand over to the moderator for the Q&A section. Thank you for your attention.
[Operator Instructions] And the first question comes from Natalia Webster from RBC.
2. Question Answer
I have a couple, please. The first on your 2026 revenue guidance for EUR 60 million to EUR 70 million. Are you able to provide a bit more of an idea of how much of this depends on FYB203 royalty specifically? And then how much of this you're expecting from the U.S. versus other regions? Then just touching on the impairment for FYB202. Are you able to walk us through your updated assumptions underpinning this revised valuation and broadly what you're assuming in terms of market share and pricing evolution over the mid- to long term?
And then secondly, on FYB206, if you're able to provide any more detail on your expectations in terms of milestones, how much you're expecting from the development side versus the partnership side? And if you're able to provide any idea on the expected timing of these, that would be helpful?
Yes. Thank you, Natalia. There are 2 finance questions and 1 partnership question, 206, maybe we start with -- in the different order with the 206 partnership question. I may hand over to Nicola, our CBO, we can give you to that. On the timing, maybe I answer that first. I mean, as I said, we have achieved positive results in our Phase I study, driven by the Phase III waiver. That gives us the opportunity to close out the clinical program and go fast track with full emphasis on our submission preparation. There are, of course, other elements that are part of the dossier.
And please understand that we cannot share a detailed timing of the submission, but you can be sure that we are on it. And the partnerships, I mean, we started already with the U.S. partnership last year. We have also [ stopped ] the deal with Lotus on APAC, and there are more regions that we can expect. And Nicola, maybe you can comment on how the interest looks like and what our position is there.
Yes, happy to do so. So we clearly see there is strong interest from Europe. We are currently focusing first on the LatAm countries because of patents expiring earlier. So that's our territory where we are very active right now, plus Europe, we have started also negotiations there. So these are the 2 big regions which we are tackling this year. And the question was also, I think, about milestone projections, right? Was that -- should I...
I can comment on that. And so first of all, welcome, Natalia to the call once again. So with regards to 206 milestones, basically, the vast majority of our revenues that we are expecting for 206 in 2026 is milestone driven. Of course, we may see some upfronts from partners like just the indicated Lotus or some other local regions, but this is probably not comparable against the milestones that we are expecting from development and regulatory activities going forward.
And this will be, as I said, one of the key pillars for our overall revenue recognition. We can unfortunately also for confidentiality reasons, not dive on the details, but the milestones are probably typical milestones that you would expect along further development and filing strategy towards market approval then in later years. And in that regard, these milestones will probably be in total can be a significant double-digit amount, which could make in the range of close to 1/3 of our total revenues, just as a rough indicator.
And on 202, as I said, this is the other major pillar of our revenue recognition. And here, certainly, the major impact is expected from royalties going forward during the different quarters. Again, here, it's a little bit difficult to estimate which royalties will come in which quarters as this will be volatile. So don't expect that necessarily to go on a linear line moving forward. And we have seen that last year also in 2024 with Q4 being exceptionally high compared against the other quarters.
So here, we, in total, are also expecting a double-digit number, which could be in total -- could make another 1/3 of our total revenues of our organization for next year in that range as a rough orientation. That's as far as I can bring it down from the revenue perspective. In terms of your questions on the impairment, of course, we have reviewed all major markets, in particular, the U.S. and Europe in our evaluation over the next couple of years. I cannot guide you on price and units or volume expectations.
Also, our partners would not be happy if we disclose this here. But this fully includes a long-term planning for the next couple of years in separated markets. And certainly, what I can say, U.S. remains the major revenue driver in our anticipation, but also U.S. remains as the major challenge. And maybe Nicola can say something later to that because the PBM market considerations are opening up, but still slowly, and that is the hurdle to our revenue generation.
Can I comment a bit on the U.S.? Yes. So just for the U.S., I mean, we still have the situation that roughly 70% of the market in volume is still with the originator with Stelara. It depends a bit on which sources you use because not all volume data is very precise for the U.S. But there is still a significant market on the brand and on the originator and the biosimilar competitors are now fighting to open up this space. And in that space, we expect more and more volume becoming available.
But as explained already in the past, this goes slower than what was originally projected in the industry. And therefore, yes, it's a marathon and not a sprint. So we have to continue with Fresenius Kabi with our partner there to gain share out of this more and more opening space to make this a long-term success and cash contributor and revenue contributor to our company.
And the next question comes from Katherine Degen from H.C. Wainwright.
This is Katie. I'm on for Yi Chen at H.C. Wainwright. I apologize if this has already been answered. My connection is not fantastic. Now that you guys have PK results that are successful, can you kind of quantify if the optimized terms you guys were looking for resulted in higher upfront payments for that 1Q '26 or if you had to trade some of that upfront cash for higher long-term royalties?
Yes. Maybe -- I mean, Andreas to comment on the PK results, so to say. But as we usually have it, a partnering deal of this kind always consists of 3 pillars, namely upfront, which we received in Q4 2025 and also then respective development milestones/commercial milestones and then obviously, royalties. And we tried to negotiate a very balanced deal here, which still has very significant upside on the long end, which we consider highly attractive. where is already recognizing double-digit million in Q4 of 2025 for upfront and milestones. And again, as I just indicated, already for '26, also having significant potential for further development milestones.
So we think all 3 parts are well covered, and do reflect the true upside of this asset as this is -- or the major deal triggering these revenues in the last year and also for this year is coming from the U.S. partnership. APAC is not yet fully covered. And also LatAm, for instance is not yet addressed and in particular, Europe is not yet partnered as well. So ideally, there's more to come during 2026 and 2027 also from that perspective, adding future deals to what we have already.
And the next question is Nicolas Pauillac from Kepler Cheuvreux.
Congrats on the results and this very interesting guidance. Maybe if I can just come back on 202 and kind of play around your answer, but would it be nice to have a view on how do you think this U.S. market is going to evolve because we still see that this is going to -- at least right now, is looking like the Humira biosimilar market. So 3 players are kind of taking it over with the private label deal. So when you do your forecast, what do you assume that this is something that kind of get blown up and so you can secure market share. So that will be the first question.
And then also still on the U.S. market, but on 201 this time. Could you kind of give us some insights into the strategy of this kind of double product commercialization that you are kind of building? What's the idea beyond that? And how should we think about it when we look into the future? And then lastly, on 203, also on the U.S., sorry, for the focus, but how confident are you that we are not going to kind of run into a similar situation to what happened with CIMERLI moving forward? So that would be the 3.
Yes. Thank you, Nicolas. Very interesting questions, of course. Maybe I get a start and then Nicola to chime in additionally. So 202, I mean, Nicola outlined already what's the situation there in the PBM market. I mean we have seen significant sales in Q4 following Fresenius Kabi's exclusive U.S. distribution deal with CivicaScript. So that shows that single deals can make a difference in both directions. So there's a lot of momentum or potential in there as well, also given the fact that 70% -- around 70% are still with the originators, so still accessible to biosimilars. It remains a stepwise approach to remove Stelara from the formularies.
And -- I mean, on top of the regulatory streamlining support for biosimilars, the clear ones from the FDA and the U.S. government, we also see the momentum shifting and the policy focus in the U.S. increasingly moving beyond this streamlining regulatory framework toward improving market access. And we saw some announcement also from PBMs and so on and some additional pressure and bills going to the Congress so that there is a momentum that goes in the right direction.
Again, timing when that will come and how that opening will happen, that's hard to predict. And that's why we put -- we believe that the assumptions we took in our second impairment now after being more than a bit of 1 year in the market, appropriately reflect what is visible and controllable today. So rather than what might become possible under more favorable structural conditions.
So that's kind of the pendula we have moved towards a realistic reflection based on one -- more than 1-year market reflection, well seeing the positive momentum in the market. Fresenius Kabi U.S. is focusing relentlessly on coverage gains with the direct contracting like with the commercial plans like the Civica deal. And in the European market, there's also gaining traction in France and Germany, for instance, and also there. I mean, you have probably realized that in Germany and France, there's pharmacy substitution being introduced, which will, of course, increase the price pressure, but more importantly, also lead to an overall increase of the biosimilar penetration. And especially with our 2 partners there, well-known 2 brands being strong in the space of the pharmacy substitution, we expect additional momentum for both brands. So given that situation, I think we have a realistic view with some potential for future growth of 202.
On the 201 U.S. strategy, I mean, there, at least we are happy that it's been reintroduced. CIMERLI is back to the market since January. And we also complemented that by a second brand, NUFYMCO with partnered with Zydus. So we can also have 2 complementary market strategies, which will also stabilize and grow that market accordingly. I cannot share more details, of course, on the different strategic approaches. But coming back to 203, I mean, yes, there's -- each partner has a different strategic approach to the buy-and-bill market. And with a partner Valorum, it's not expected that they go the same path as we did for CIMERLI. So I would not expect a similar dynamics or a similar action coming from Valorum on 203.
Okay. Super clear. And maybe if I can just squeeze a final one. On the going concerns, does that include every -- the new investment that you will have to put into 208 when it moved into clinical study and the rest of the pipeline?
Yes, I can confirm that. So our current assumption triggering the going concern or resulting into a positive going concern is. The current cash reserves that we had at the end of the year, EUR 68.8 million, plus the assumed revenues that we have going forward should carry the organization based on the current portfolio as you see it today in our pipeline being covered from a development perspective. So 208, 210 million and so on and also the remainder, by the way, for 206 being covered under this aspect. If we would go significantly beyond that from a portfolio perspective, then this is a different story.
And the next question comes from Simon Scholes from First Berlin.
I've just got a couple of questions. First of all, on the 206 milestones, I mean you did EUR 17.2 million last year. And I gather from what you've been saying you expect it to be at least the same or higher this year. I mean, last year, you had the marketing agreements in the U.S. and MENA, I think, and this year, Asia Pacific. So are you expecting Europe and Asia Pacific together to exceed the milestone from the U.S. and MENA?
And then on CapEx, I was wondering if you could provide -- I mean, you did EUR 54 million in CapEx last year. I was wondering if you could give us an idea of what the magnitude of that number might be this year and what the emphasis of spending of that expenditure might be, which products?
Yes. Thanks, Simon, for the questions. Maybe I'll take the first ones. I mean the 206 milestones are not only down payments for deal signature. So the milestones are deferred over a period, and they include also development milestones achievements like, for instance, the positive PK results added already to -- or will add to milestone payments that will come during this year. So it's a mix of down payment for new deals, but also in addition, milestone payments for existing deals based on development progress. That's number one. CapEx goes to my neighbor.
Yes. So CapEx was a particularly high this year, 2020 -- last year, sorry, 2025 due to the significant investment into the clinical stage of 206. For 2026 operational year, we have an expectation of less CapEx as 210, for instance, is not yet clinical. 208 is getting ready or being prepared, but yet not fully exposed despite the respective costs being capitalized. And we have some remaining activities under 206 also being capitalized, but that's not a major volume. And therefore, total CapEx invest at least from an investment perspective for developing our products is reduced -- clearly reduced compared to what we had last year.
Currently, there are no further questions. [Operator Instructions] That is not the case, and that concludes the Q&A session. And I will hand back to Dr. Stefan Glombitza for some closing words.
Yes. Thank you. And finally, I would like to thank the operator, of course, our Investor Relations teams for all the preparations, my Board colleagues for joining in for the answers and especially everyone on the call who joined today's earnings session. So thank you for your continued interest and trust in Formycon. We remain fully committed to delivering sustainable growth and creating long-term value for our shareholders and ultimately to the patients worldwide. Thank you so much, and have a good afternoon.
Formycon — Q3 2025 Earnings Call
1. Management Discussion
Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Formycon AG Earnings Call 9 Months 2025. [Operator Instructions]
Let me now turn the floor over to Stefan Glombitza, the CEO of Formycon.
Yes. Thank you for the introduction, Beatrice. Good afternoon, good morning, and warm welcome also from my side. We appreciate your attendance and interest, as always, in Formycon's Q3 earnings call.
Earlier today, we already issued a press release providing detailed insights into our Q3 and 9-month performance. In short, I'm pleased to reaffirm our full-year guidance across all key financial indicators. Revenue and EBITDA remain on track, while working capital remains at the elevated level from our half year update.
During the third quarter, we achieved several highly accretive operational milestones across all programs. Just to pick out one, most notably, we successfully completed patient recruitment for our Phase I clinical trial of FYB206 Keytruda biosimilar, an achievement that positions us in a very competitive spot for this highly attractive and important PD-1 segment in oncology. Building on pioneering Phase III waiver secured earlier this year, this milestone unlocks substantial first-mover advantages.
Financially, Q3 results reflect the commercial ramp-up phase for Otulfi, being only a few months into its launch. In Q3, we are already seeing growing traction in key geographies. And these results align with our phasing assumptions for this transformational period. We anticipate significant revenue generations and events in Q4, reinforcing our confidence in meeting the 2025 full-year guidance, and we will come to that.
Over the next 30 minutes, we will provide additional context on both the operational achievements and the financial performance, along with an outlook for the coming period. Enno Spillner, our CFO, and I will guide you through the key facts in our joint presentation. Nicola Mikulcik, our CBO; and Andreas Seidl, our CSO, are also here and will join in for the Q&A session to address any questions you may have.
Let us start with the presentation now. As usual, in those settings, I'm starting with the legal disclaimer on forward-looking statements during our presentation and the Q&A section. Our strategic road map remains unchanged. We continue to execute with discipline and laser focus on our growth trajectory. 2024 was pivotal for Formycon, with 2 additional biosimilar approvals laying the groundwork for the next stage of acceleration. And this progress positions us to achieve sustainable profitability as soon as these products gain traction in the key markets. Our ongoing operational successes build a solid foundation for transforming Formycon into a leading biopharmaceutical company.
Let me just comment on the FDA's recent move towards streamlining biosimilar development. This promotes faster, more cost-efficient pathways, thus creating tremendous opportunities, playing strongly to our advantage. With the recent regulatory movements, comprehensive analytical characterization and similarity assessments are becoming even more critical. And these represent core differentiating strengths of Formycon's development platform. We are excited to leverage these.
Our products already are improving the lives of patients worldwide. As commercial revenues continue to grow, they will further fuel our pipeline and expand access to vital medicines, advancing our mission through the strength of our development powerhouse. Supported by the positive momentum in the biosimilars market, recent encouraging signals from the U.S. regulators and the strong potential of our pipeline, we are at an inflection point pivoting toward profitable growth.
Our target remains unchanged; achieve sustainable EBITDA profitability ideally as early as 2026. The biosimilar segment, while still relatively young, is evolving rapidly and undergoing dynamic changes and everybody sees that. This creates tremendous opportunities and the underlying momentum is unmistakably one of growth. In such a dynamic environment, having a clear strategic compass, knowing where to play and how to win is essential. And our operational and commercial activities are guided by clear strategic drivers, essential levers that are flagged here and that position us for long-term success.
There is significant geopolitical momentum underway everywhere, underscoring the importance of geographic diversification. Expanding into high-growth emerging markets and building a broad network of regional marketing specialists enables us to capture opportunities globally and maximize the leverage of our developments. We intensified our diversification efforts and will continue to do so because this is laying the foundation today for tomorrow's growth.
Excellence in pipeline selection remains critical. That's undoubted. Identifying the right assets then advancing with focus and conviction. The current initiatives on streamlined development and the improved regulatory policies create compelling business cases now for targeting reference products in the niche-buster category while helping to address the significant biosimilar demand.
Our strong backbone is deep, deep biosimilar development expertise, which also serves us as the basis for innovation as another key differentiator. Advanced technologies such as our ophthalmic pre-filled syringe delivers superior product features for patients and health care professionals. But innovation for us also means shaping science, challenging the existing policies, influencing regulatory frameworks through creative pioneering approaches such as the Phase III waivers. These initiatives not only provide significant savings like the high double-digit millions in the FYB206 program, but they also enable faster, more cost-efficient development across our pipeline.
Building on our extensive experience from the 3 approved programs, we are streamlining development processes as we speak, supported by targeted AI deployment and continuous refinement of our approach. We are constantly reshaping our organization, reflecting these important improvements like the Phase III waivers in our operational model. As a result, Formycon can now deliver its biosimilar pipeline at greater speed and at lower cost. And this will finally allow us to fully leverage our platform and capitalize on the unprecedented number of loss of exclusivity opportunities in the coming years. Throughout the first half of 2025, we communicated a series of achievements and thanks -- really big thanks to the strong performance of our operational teams, we have further enhanced our value proposition across our pipeline.
Let's have a closer look at our operational achievements in Q3. For 201, Q3 marked 2 significant milestones in our strategic road map: innovation and diversification. The introduction of the first ranibizumab biosimilar and especially designed ophthalmic pre-filled syringe represents a major step forward after a demanding development journey. This pre-filled syringe delivers a safe and more convenient way of administration to the retina specialists and their patients with severe ophthalmologic diseases. It underscores our commitment to advancing ophthalmic care.
Executing on our diversification strategy in emerging markets, our partner, Bio Usawa, achieved the first registration for FYB201 in Sub-Saharan Africa and is preparing for launch in a remarkably short time. We are excited and feel honored to help address the high unmet need for affordable biologic treatments in regions where such options have been virtually non-existent.
FYB202 is gaining commercial momentum step by step. A key highlight, of course, of Q3 was Fresenius Kabi's exclusive distribution agreement with CivicaScript. Together with our partner, we anticipate incremental sales in Q4 from this arrangement. Fresenius Kabi is pursuing conventional and partly innovative ways, targeting health plans in non-exclusive and exclusive settings, including distribution models such as the exclusive agreement with CivicaScript. The pharmacy benefits landscape in general is evolving and the trend strongly, by the way, supported by the U.S. government continues to accelerate biosimilar adoption.
Looking globally, the product has been launched in 20 countries as of today and market penetration in key European markets continues to progress. And we are confident that our commercial partners will leverage their strong sales capabilities and brand reputation to drive market share gains and access for patients across Europe with severe immunological diseases.
For FYB203, additional commercial partnerships have been secured for Latin America and Australia, complementing our global coverage. All partners are in the wings for a staggered launch as soon as the IP conditions allow. And a major milestone in this context was the settlement agreement with Regeneron, paving the way for a U.S. launch in Q4 next year.
For FYB206, the year began with a breakthrough news, positive regulatory feedback from FDA, allowing us to waive the Phase III clinical efficacy study for our Keytruda biosimilar. This shifted the recruitment time of patients in our Phase I PK study on the critical time path for submissions in the first countries. In July already, we announced last patient in, meaning recruitment for the FYB206 clinical program is now complete and we expect final Phase I results as early as Q1 next year already. This unique time advantage positions us extremely well for this highly attractive asset, a fact that is evident in multiple licensing discussions. So in parallel to our development focus, we are very busy with putting in place our commercial partnering network. And we expect to sign licensing agreements for certain geographies still in Q4, with others following in 2026. Just to say, our priority remains securing the best possible partnerships for this asset in each region rather than rushing deal signatures.
FYB208 demonstrates highly attractive cell line characteristics, and we successfully achieved the so-called TPoS milestone technical proof of similarity. This is an essential gateway to manufacturing scale-up and to clinical development with elevated probability of success. So looking at all the achievements in Q3 even, our strong operational momentum will continue to generate positive news flow also in Q4 and beyond. And these achievements form the foundation for future revenues, the lifeblood of our growth journey.
And with that, I want to conclude the strategic and operational part and hand over to our CFO, Enno Spillner, for financial details.
Yes. Thank you, Stefan, and welcome, everyone, to our Q3 2025 numbers call.
It's a great pleasure having you on the call, and I will certainly also provide our outlook for the remainder of the year. But let's start with a look at our P&L, which is on track to what we anticipated for Q3 2025 so far. And looking at the revenues, which are in range of what we expected for Q3, namely at EUR 10.5 million for the respective quarter based on our guidance, which we provided end of March of this year. Due to the transformation of our revenue structure, revenues are clearly reduced compared against the first 9 months of 2024.
Furthermore, I reiterate on what we indicated already in previous calls and especially during our H1 call, we will see a very backloaded and therefore, Q4 focused revenue performance in 2025. Details, I will have on the following slides. Cost of sales increased against Q3 2024. And while this might be a bit surprising at first sight, it is to be considered that more than 50% of cost of sales stem from FYB202's regular amortization, which simply didn't exist in the first 9 months of 2024.
Would we adjust for this accounting measure, we would be looking at operational cost of sales of approximately EUR 18.5 million for the first 9 months of 2025 versus EUR 32.5 million in the first 9 months of 2024, thus a massive reduction of costs. R&D expenses reduced compared to 2024 due to possible phasing of development costs for our early-stage projects as we do have more time to develop these. Major costs do come from FYB208 early-stage development.
EBITDA is about in the same corridor than last year. This is due to savings and phasing, along the previous positions I just described and due to the effect that the before-mentioned amortization is neither EBITDA nor cash flow relevant. Adjusted -- or the adjusted EBITDA declined significantly due to the reduced equity result coming from our joint venture Bioeq, which is running our FYB201 performance. With Sandoz pausing its U.S. activities for Cimerli effective Q2 2025 and Q1 sales being on the lower end, there's little contribution from this joint venture during the first 9 months of 2025. The capitalized development costs in 2025 have fully contributed to the clinical development activities of FYB206. The clear increase of this investment is because FYB206 clinical trials started in June 2024 only. Therefore, no major relevance in the first half of last year.
Let's review the breakdown of our sales, consisting now of 4 pillars: a, development compensation; b, upfront and milestone payments; c, royalties; and d, and that's new supply. As indicated during our H1 call already, the new category supply represents sales as a manufacturer of FYB202 for retained countries and FYB203's supply chain management. Both haven't been recognized as revenues in the first 9 months of 2024 yet. Current development continues to reflect our change in revenue structure.
While recharges for development compensation on FYB201 and FYB203 continue to reduce as products mature successfully, deferred milestones from FYB202 have completely faded out in 2025 due to the successful approval of the product in fall 2024. FYB201 royalties reduced mainly due to the pausing of the marketing of the products in the U.S., which we assume to resume in Q1 2026, by the way.
In return, FYB202 generated $3.7 million of revenues, including milestones from retained countries, showing an acceleration comparing against Q1 and Q2 of this year. While royalties for the first 2 quarters totaled in the range of $1.5 million, we recorded $1.6 million in Q3 alone, thus developing into the right direction.
In total, the incoming royalties are not yet in a range to compensate for the other effects, but we see 3 positive factors pointing into the growth direction. FYB201 to return for marketing in the U.S. during Q1 2026, also according to public information by Sandoz. FYB202 expected to further accelerate revenue in Europe and the U.S. in particular; and FYB203 with a settlement now in place for the U.S., starting sales and marketing during the course of Q4 2026.
Also with regard to our cost of sales, we are recognizing similar structural changes as just described in context of our revenues. Operational cost of sales reduced significantly for FYB202, going down by EUR 8 million, plus cutting more than 50% of cost of sales for FYB201 and also FYB203 cost of sales being reduced due to fading out of our development work.
On the other side, we do record a new position for FYB202's regular amortization. This EUR 18.8 million amount is neither EBITDA nor cash relevant, as I mentioned already, but significantly influences our cost of sales. Adjusted for this amortization, our operational cost of sales reduced by more than 40%.
Let's review some group asset KPIs. Our balance sheet totals at a strong EUR 789 million. The increase mainly results from an increased cash position derived from our new bond facility. Equity is reduced by EUR 59 million, mainly due to the net result. And at the same time, our liabilities increased by EUR 76 million or 25%, which mainly is in context of the issuance of our bond. Please let me remind you that the rest mainly are earn-out liabilities, which do correlate to the performance of our products.
Consequently, we only have to pay these once we receive respective cash inflows, especially from FYB201. Therefore, these liabilities are no hard or no fixed liabilities with regard to the final numbers. Furthermore, we do experience a technical effect from non-current liabilities, resulting from a change in our WACC from 10% down to 9.3% being used to discount the earn-out obligations. In consequence, our equity ratio slightly drops, but remains with a solid 51%. And cash and cash equivalents adjusted to almost EUR 80 million at the end of Q3 2025.
Cash flow and working capital were determined by multiple factors. Net cash from operating activities was quite balanced between our negative EBITDA and a positive impact from trade receivables. Net cash from investing activities reflects our strong engagement into FYB206, showing a EUR 32 million investment, while at the same time, receiving more than EUR 12 million from Bioeq, repaying further parts of their shareholder loan to Formycon.
Net cash from financing activities was mainly affected by the bond versus some earn-out payments. In addition, on the working capital side, aside of the strong EUR 80 million cash position, current receivables as well as current liabilities and accruals were the most influential factors, leading to Q3 2025 working capital of EUR 83 million.
But let's get back to our financial guidance for the remainder of the year. It is obvious that with revenues of EUR 19.5 million recognized for the first 9 months of 2025, aiming for EUR 55 million to EUR 65 million for the full year still looks ambitious. However, we remain positive, as Stefan already indicated just now, to achieve the revenue guidance for the full-year 2025 based on 2 main revenue drivers.
First, regarding FYB202, we are receiving positive signs from our commercialization partners for a further increase in revenues and thus, royalties for Formycon. This is especially true for the fourth quarter of 2025, also based on indications made by Fresenius Kabi during their recent Q3 call that they are anticipating incremental sales with Otulfi in Q4, following the exclusive U.S. distribution agreement with CivicaScript.
Second, we continue to push for indicated conclusion of first licensing partnerships for 206, and we are progressing well in positive discussions with various industry players, which may become our future partners for FYB206. Not yet a done deal, but we consider it realistic to conclude accordingly still this year. That said, and to be very clear, we will not sign a deal for any price, but we want to come out within our expected range for commercial targets. Otherwise, we would rather sign at a later stage than participating -- partnering at a suboptimal terms or conditions.
So in essence, Formycon expects a strong and very dynamic fourth quarter due to the before-mentioned 2 main effects, plus continued revenue contribution from FYB201and FYB203. Overall, we confirm our guidance for 2025. Revenues for 2025 will be backloaded due to market grip of FYB202 and expected licensing deals for FYB206. Full-year EBITDA will benefit from the expected positive revenue performance during the fourth quarter of the year.
Adjusted EBITDA also should reverse slightly based on an underlying roughly plus/minus 0 at-equity result of our Bioeq joint venture. And working capital will -- or was already uplifted in H1 2025, mainly due to the successful bond financing. This should remain unchanged. Liquidity, with the additional EUR 70 million gross from our bond issuance, leaves us with sufficient cash to fuel the development of our current pipeline and achieving EBITDA profitability.
Just 3 points very briefly on this slide. Engagement of our existing anchor investors remains very stable. Comparing trading volume from 2024 versus the first 9 months of '25 shows an approximately 4x increase of our average share liquidity. And one comment on research coverage. As many of you probably know, quite a few changes are taking place within the German small and mid-cap banking community, including research capabilities being reduced.
In this context, Hauck & Aufhauser as well as M.M. Warburg informed us that they will cease their research activities and therefore, discontinue their coverage on Formycon. This will happen the latest at the end of this year. We, of course, regret these measures. I would like to sincerely thank the respective analysts for constructive dialogue and a very good interaction, and hope to meet them again very soon in another context.
With that said, I'm at the end of my part of the presentation and would like to hand back to Stefan for a final summary. Thank you very much.
Yes. Thank you, Enno, for the helpful financial insights.
So let me conclude with an overview where we are positioned. So with 3 pipeline assets approved, 2 already marketed and the third one poised for a U.S. launch following the recent settlement agreement, we have established a trust-building track record. We believe we have all the ingredients for long-term success, the right strategy, scientific excellence and the agility to adapt and seize opportunities. And this enables us to expand patient access to critical biologics through our licensed partners and play an increasingly important role in this high-growth segment.
Biosimilars are still young, but here to stay. We operate in the fastest-growing segment of pharma, with more than 100 biologics losing exclusivity over the next decade. No single player can address them all. But with a streamlined development, we can deliver biosimilars faster and more cost effectively, capturing a greater share of these opportunities for the benefit of patients and health care systems worldwide. The stage is set for the next chapter of Formycon's growth story.
Thank you for your attention. With that, I conclude the presentation and hand over to the moderator for the Q&A session.
[Operator Instructions] And first up is Natalia Webster from RBC.
2. Question Answer
My first one is just around your full-year guidance. So it's implying obviously, Q4 quite a large step-up. Just curious if you're able to provide any more indication of how much you're factoring in, in terms of the pickup in FYB202 royalties versus the milestones for a potential deal for FYB206, appreciating some of those agreements may come in Q1 next year?
And then my second question, specifically on FYB202. If you're able to talk a bit more around the market penetration in the U.S. and Europe, are you still expecting it to take around 9 to 12 months in terms of reaching that inflection point, the market opening up more significantly? And then around your agreement with Fresenius Kabi in the U.S. I know they signed that exclusive agreement with Civica. Do you expect further contracts? And do you expect those to influence Q4? Or will that more likely be in 2026?
Thank you, Natalia. So let me maybe take the #2 and #3, and then I hand back to Enno for the guidance question. So on ustekinumab performance in general and in U.S. specifically, we anticipate, as mentioned in the call, in the presentation, incremental sales in Q4 following the Fresenius Kabi's exclusive distribution agreement with CivicaScript. And the general -- this is a very important milestone and following a set of deals that Fresenius Kabi is driving relentlessly to gain coverage.
Fresenius Kabi is going conventional, but also partly new types of ways with exclusive and non-exclusive agreements targeting direct health plans, direct distribution agreements and like the ones with CivicaScript. In general, we see a good movement there with Fresenius Kabi moving forward and signing one deal after the other. But on the other hand, the market penetration in general in the pharma benefit segment doesn't move that fast. And we always indicated that it's not a big splash, but an incremental increase. And it still takes time what we see.
I mean, we're 6 months in the market. And if you look at adalimumab comparable case, it took more than a year until we saw a significant inflection. And now we are talking worldwide of over 60% market share and also more than 26% market share in the U.S. of the biosimilars. So, it will come step by step. Still some time to remove Stelara from the lead position on many formularies. But we see it moving in the right direction, and we see Fresenius Kabi really doing a great job there and going several avenues to achieve more traction and achieve more market share in reasonable deals. And with that, as read, we feel confident to confirm the guidance with the Civica deal delivering results already in Q4, and we see more deals, of course, and signatures to come for the next deals, which make us confident.
And then back to the guidance, Enno?
Yes. Welcome, Natalia, also from my side on your question on the full-year guidance. Of course, I cannot disclose any detailed numbers here right now also due to ongoing negotiations with our potential partners. But clearly, if we succeed and also locking in one of the major regions, for instance, we certainly would assume that upfront and/or milestones in total would be clearly double-digit for FYB206 and then followed by FYB202 revenue generation in the last quarter. So, that would be the 2 leading part of our revenue generation. And as I said, certainly, 203 and 201 will also contribute, but that is certainly a couple of levels below the expectation for these 2 assets. That's as detailed as I can go right now. Sorry about that.
If I could just add one more question just around your costs. You mentioned around the Phase III waivers and lower development costs. Just curious to hear if that could benefit your P&L over the midterm or whether you'll look to reinvest that back into the pipeline?
I mean, in general, if you look at the costs, there's a lot of, of course, positive momentum by the streamlining regulatory framework motions that we see not only from the FDA but also from major regulators across the world, EMEA and U.K. And I mean, already depends on the Phase III waiver, it really depends on the clinical program costs and they might differ several magnitudes from oncology studies to other indications. But in principle, we see that we feel enabled to with the cost efficiency measures to develop a biosimilar for a cost investment in the range of EUR 80 million to EUR 100 million. And this is a significant reduction towards the past. And this, I think, puts us in a very competitive situation.
It's still maybe the next question that might come, will that increase the competition heavily? But as I said, I mean, we're talking significant investments still. The entry barriers are pretty high with that. So, that does not mean cost reduction and investment reduction, does not mean that it opens up to multiple players that can now afford to develop biosimilars, just as an additional comment.
And next up is Yi Chen from H.C. Wainwright.
Congratulations on the quarter. This is Eduardo on for Yi. In regards to 203, I'm curious if you have any estimates or ideas about price at launch in Q4 '26?
Yes, that's a question I can really not comment and not answer. I mean we, of course, have now the settlement, are very happy that we are in this wave of additional biosimilars that first got first settlements. But there is a -- I mean, as soon as we start the marketing and preparation activities, we will know more about the pricing, but this is too early and of course, nothing we would be able to share officially. Sorry, I hope you can understand that.
That's okay. I guess in similar, maybe this one, you can have some idea as you prepare for the launches. You mentioned about -- you alluded to adalimumab as this 1-year time line and how you see this incremental growth over time. Do you anticipate that 206 would be a similar ramp after launch -- 203, I mean?
203 is different. It's not in the pharma benefit segment. So 203, we would more look into the Cimerli, ranibizumab, buy-and-bill segment of ophthalmology. So, we expect a much faster ramp-up in that segment. Also as -- I mean, ranibizumab, Cimerli, that was the first biosimilar in that VEGF space and now the way is paved and the retina specialists know how to deal with biosimilars, which are equally safe and efficacious. So, we expect a faster ramp-up for sure.
Got it. And I guess just a final one on the pre-filled syringe you guys mentioned you launched in Europe. And what insights you're gaining there for 201 and if you anticipate potentially bringing that to the U.S. and how that's contributing to your growth traction in Europe?
Yes. I mean, it's in the early starting, but what we get at least from the retina specialists is a very positive feedback because that syringe comes with a lot of very positive features, technologically safe application. We have a very low subvisible particle load, so all the -- and very good handling. And it's also very modern technology. So with that said, we get positive feedback, but sales-wise, we have to wait how that evolves. For sure, we expect that, let's say, markets like Germany and France, which didn't open up that much to the vial will definitely open up more fast, and that's what we see already in the forecast from our commercial partners.
The next question comes from Simon Scholes from First Berlin.
I've just got 2 questions. First of all, I was wondering if you could tell us what the figure for reimbursed development services was after 9 months? I couldn't see that in the presentation.
And secondly, I was just wondering if you could give any comment at all on the possible timing of the conclusion of 203 negotiations with Regeneron with respect to Europe? I mean, do you think the negotiations on Europe are likely to take more than a year longer than the U.S. negotiations did?
Yes. Simon, thanks for the very good question. Maybe I'll take the IP question on 203 first and then hand over to Enno for the development services. So the European question, as you rightly flagged, is different from the U.S. situation. So here, our litigation partner, let's say, in that is Bayer. The situation is still pretty complex involving multiple different national court procedures, which are partly public, and we'll continue to pursue litigation activities, has to be led country by country, and we'll see which potential launch dates will result from those proceedings. But there are some positive signals from some countries and some where we're going to appeal in other territories. So this is hard to predict, but how long it will take, but will, for sure, be a staggered approach country by country, depending on the court and litigation situation.
And Enno, reimbursement question?
Simon, you were referring to that to 203, correct?
No, just in general. I mean, I think in the H1 presentation, you had a line on the slides referring to reimbursed development services.
Yes. So what I can tell you is that basically recharges for Q3 standalone for FYB201 and FYB203, where we are receiving still some recharges were in the range of EUR 4.5 million.
Okay. That's helpful. And was that affected -- presumably that was affected by payments for development of the syringe.
Yes, that's the major part. I mean, as you know, the products have been approved already in both cases. So it's really the final work on pre-filled syringe mainly.
At the moment, there are no further questions. [Operator Instructions] There are no further questions.
So yes, with that, Beatrice, so I think we can conclude the call. And finally, I would like to thank you, the operator, our Investor Relations team and also my Board colleagues, especially everyone who joined today's earnings calls and asking great questions.
So, thank you for your interest and trust in Formycon. We remain deeply committed to driving sustainable growth and creating long-term value for our shareholders. So, thank you very much for joining in and looking forward to the next interactions we will have.
Formycon — Q3 2025 Earnings Call
Financial data from Formycon
Revenue
Revenue is the sum of all sales generated by a company, e.g. for its products or services.
Revenue (TTM) metric explainedDirect Costs
Direct costs are the costs incurred directly in connection with the manufacture of the product or service.
Gross Profit
Gross Profit indicates how much of the revenue remains in the company after deducting direct production costs. If the percentage share of sales is calculated, this is referred to as the gross margin.
Gross Profit metric explainedSelling and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) include all expenses for marketing and sales as well as the general administration of the company.
Research and Development Expense
Research and development costs (R&D) provide information on how much the company invests in the research and development of its products. The costs are particularly interesting as a percentage of revenue and in comparison to direct competitors.
EBITDA
EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization) is the company's earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. The EBITDA margin is calculated as a percentage of sales.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation represents reductions in the value of the company's assets (e.g. due to wear and tear on machinery).
EBIT (Operating Income)
EBIT (Earnings Before Interest and Taxes) is the company's profit before interest and taxes, also known as the operating income. The EBIT Margin is calculated as a percentage of sales at
.
Net Profit
Net Profit represents the profit or loss after deduction of all costs.
Net Profit metric explainedStocksGuide Premium
| Jun '26 |
+/-
%
|
||
| Revenue | 61 61 |
18%
18%
100%
|
|
| - Direct Costs | 47 47 |
10%
10%
77%
|
|
| Gross Profit | 14 14 |
2,839%
2,839%
23%
|
|
| - Selling and Administrative Expenses | 23 23 |
16%
16%
37%
|
|
| - Research and Development Expense | 7.02 7.02 |
53%
53%
11%
|
|
| EBITDA | 70 70 |
298%
298%
115%
|
|
| - Depreciation and Amortization | 85 85 |
6,676%
6,676%
139%
|
|
| EBIT (Operating Income) EBIT | -15 -15 |
60%
60%
-24%
|
|
| Net Profit | -25 -25 |
85%
85%
-41%
|
|
In millions EUR.
Don't miss a Thing! We will send you all news about Formycon directly to your mailbox free of charge.
If you wish, we will send you an e-mail every morning with news on stocks of your portfolios.
Formycon Stock News
Company Profile
Formycon AG engages in the manufacture of biosimilar drugs and formulations. Its product candidates include FYB201, FYB202, FYB203, and FYB205 which focusoin the opthalmology and immunology disease areas. The company was founded by Friedrich Wilhelm Steinweg and Nicolas Combé in 2007 and is headquartered in Munich, Germany.
StocksGuide Premium
| Head office | Germany |
| CEO | Dr. Glombitza |
| Employees | 203 |
| Founded | 2007 |
| Website | www.formycon.com |


